Republican proposal slashes weekly unemployment benefits to $200 as it happened – The Guardian

The Environmental Protection Agencys Office of Inspector General said today it will evaluate the agencys rollback of Obama-era vehicle emissions requirements.

In May, Senator Tom Carper, a Democrat who sits on the Senate Eenvironment and public works committee, asked the inspector generals office to investigate whether EPA officials improperly circumvented the Clean Air Act, regulatory and other procedural requirements, citing documents obtained by Carpers office, Reuters reports.

The inspector generals office said it would conduct an evaluation to determine if EPA actions were consistent with requirements, including those pertaining to transparency, record-keeping and docketing, and followed the EPAs process for developing final regulatory actions.

The EPA did not immediately comment.

In March the EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finalized revised rules requiring 1.5% annual increases in fuel efficiency through 2026.Under the Obama rules, automakers were to average about 5% improvements per year through 2025.

The new requirements mean the US vehicle fleet will average 40.4 miles a gallon rather than 46.7 mpg under the Obama rules.

The administration says the new rules will result in the consumption of about 2bn additional barrels of oil and the emission of 867m to 923m additional metric tons of carbon dioxide and will cut the future price of new vehicles by about $1,000 and reduce traffic deaths.

Environmentalists dispute that the rule will reduce traffic deaths and say higher fuel costs will surpass any future new vehicle price reduction.

The inspector general wants numerous documents including briefing materials on the final rule.

Carper said the documents obtained show significant inaccuracies and technical errors in the final rule that the EPA apparently asked the transportation department to correct.

According to these documents, EPA officials believed the failure to correct those inaccuracies and errors would make the rule legally vulnerable to challenge, Carper wrote.

See the article here:

Republican proposal slashes weekly unemployment benefits to $200 as it happened - The Guardian