Harvard Medical School Professors Uncover a Hard To Swallow Truth About …

We are constantly told that vaccines are safe and effective and that theres nothing to worry about. This simply isnt the case, and its a hard-to-swallow truth that many people refuse to acknowledge. Mass marketing campaignsportray vaccines in a God-like light, and the science is being ignored. The truth is that vaccines are actually exempt from double blind placebo controlled studies and they have not been put through appropriate safety testing. Furthermore, a number of concerns have been raised about vaccine safety by a number of scientists arounds the world. I like to use aluminum as an example. Astudy published in 2011makes the issue quite clear, stating, Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical sciences understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. Fast forward nearly a decade later and scientists have now shown that injected aluminum does not exit the body, it actually sticks around and gets carried by specific cells into distant organs and into the brain where it can be detected after injection (source)(source). Multiple studies have emphasized these findings, and the studies do nothing but trigger silence from big pharma as well as our federal health regulatory agencies.

Federal health regulatory agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have a long history of traceable corruption and not responding to inquiries made by scientists. One example comesfrom a pilot studyby the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR)to test the efficiency of a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system on data records from the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institution.

The main doctors involved with the study were Michael Klompas, M.D. andLazarus, Ross, MBBS, MPH, MMed, GDCompSci.

Klompas is a Professor of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School, and Lazarus was a Harvard Medical School professor for 11 years, and was a professor there during this pilot study. Dissolving Illusions: ... Bystrianyk, Roman Best Price: $38.50 Buy New $21.60 (as of 11:00 UTC - Details)

Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.

This completely contradicts the CDCs claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.

The doctors also bring up something very important, and thats the fact that investigators from the CDCs Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) participated on a panel to explore the perspective of clinicians, electronic health record (EHR) vendors, the pharmaceutical industry, and the FDA towards systems that use proactive, automated adverse event reporting.

The doctors emphasize how fewer than 1% percent of vaccine adverse events are even reported. So, theoretically, that 1/39 number discovered from the data mentioned above is actually a lot greater given the fact that many adverse events arent even reported.

As the authors state:

Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of problem drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting imbedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs. (source)

Whats really telling is that the doctors state that there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessmentsdue to the factthat the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving datawere no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.

That last part is quite concerning, isnt it?

It reminds me of the Spider Papers.

A group called the CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or CDC SPIDER, put a list of complaints in a letter to the CDC Chief of Staff and provideda copy of the letterto the public watchdog organizationU.S. Right to Know (USRTK).

Weareagroupofscientistsat CDC that are veryconcerned about the current state of ethicsat ouragency.Itappearsthat ourmission isbeing influenced and shaped byoutside partiesand rogueinterests.Itseemsthat ourmission and Congressional intent for our agencyisbeing circumventedbysomeof ourleaders. What concernsusmost, isthat it isbecoming the norm andnottherareexception. Some seniormanagement officialsat CDC are clearlyaware and evencondonethesebehavior.

There is also a revolving door between CDC employees and Big Pharma employees.A great example with regards to vaccines would be Julie Gerberding. A fairly recent post by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. via hisInstagram accountexplains:

Julie Gerberding. As CDC Director from 2002-2009 Gerberding: -Granted Merck a lucrative monopoly for its blockbuster MMR vaccine based on efficacy data falsified by Merck and never verified by CDC. (Merck ordered its scientists to add rabbit antibodies to human blood samples to fool regulators.) That vaccine is now causing epidemics of dangerous mumps outbreaks in older populations. -Oversaw publication of key CDC study, Desteffano 2004, designed to conceal links between Mercks MMR vaccine and the autism epidemic. -Punished, threatened, and silenced CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson when he tried to report that CDC officials destroyed data linking autism epidemic to Mercks MMR vaccine. -Approved and mandated Mercks dangerous and ineffective $3.2 billion Gardisil vaccine based on clearly falsified safety and efficacy data.

In 2010 Merck rewarded Gerberding for her lucrative fealty to Merck during her 7 years as CDC Director with an appointment to run Mercks vaccines division at a $2.5 million annual salary and $5 million in stock options.

We Know About Vaccine Injuries, But Are Vaccines Even Effective/Necessary ForThose Who Dont Get Injured?

I like to use the MMR vaccine as an example for vaccine injuries.

According to aMedAlertssearch of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, which is the subject of the pilot study mentioned above, as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid out approximately $4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children. As astronomical as the monetary awards are, theyre even more alarming considering HHS claims that only anestimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reportedto theVaccine Adverse Events Reporting, System(VAERS). Again, these facts are also illustrated by the study thats the main focus of this article. If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported and the families of the vast majority of people injured by vaccines are picking up the costs, once again, for vaccine makers flawed products.

From 2013 to 2017, measles killed 2 people, butthe vaccine killed 127 people. The odds of dying from the measlesare 0.01 0.02 percent, meaning you have a greater chance of getting hit by a lightning bolt multiple times. Furthermore, if your child contracts the measles, they will be immune for life, but that cannot be said for vaccinated children.

So theres that, and then there is the fact that measles outbreaks have occurred in highly vaccinated populations. A study published as far back as 1994 in JAMA Internal Medicine makes this quite clear.

Measles is the most transmissible disease known to man. During the 1980s, the number of measles cases in the United States rose dramatically. Surprisingly, 20% to 40% of these cases occurred in persons who had been appropriately immunized against measles. In response, the United States adopted a twodose universal measles immunization program. We critically examine the effect of vaccine failure in measles occurring in immunized persons.

We found 18 reports of measles outbreaks in very highly immunized school populations where 71% to 99.8% of students were immunized against measles. Despite these high rates of immunization, 30% to 100% (mean, 77%) of all measles cases in these outbreaks occurred in previously immunized students. In our hypothetical school model, after more than 95% of schoolchildren are immunized against measles, the majority of measles cases occur in appropriately immunized children.(source)

The only sad thing about the study above is that they recommended more vaccines to try and make up for vaccine failure.

During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences. The media (Pharma-owned) generated high public anxiety. This fear mongering led to the demonization of unvaccinated children, who were perceived as the spreaders of this disease. Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of the published report, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases who had the data proving that the measles outbreak was in part caused by the vaccine. It is evidence of the vaccines failure to provide immunity. (source) Jabbed: How the Vaccin... Wilcox, Brett Best Price: $18.85 Buy New $19.03 (as of 12:00 UTC - Details)

According to an article published in theAmerican Journal of Public Healthin 1991, In early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. (source)

A studypublished in the highly authoritativeBulletin of the World Health Organizationlooked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012, with a steep upward trend in 2013. The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 26,443 was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012. This is odd considering thatsince 2009 the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target population. (source)

A study published in the journalClinical Infectious Diseases whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak, which showed that individualswith prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).(source)

The list of examples is long, and it suggests that we are seeing a failing vaccine instead of a failure to vaccinate, yet these are facts that mainstream media never addresses.

It makes you wonder, how effective are vaccines, and are they even producing immunity like they are marketed to do?

Ill leave you with the video below of Mary Holland educating the Washington committee on HB1638, a mandatory vaccination bill similar to the recent bill on mandatory vaccination passed in California,SB276.

The Takeaway

Its quite clear that mandatory vaccinations arent justifiable. The information presented in this article is constantly ignored and never addressed by the opposition. Instead, mainstream media uses terms like anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and ridicule to further drive home their corporate agenda. Why are points made in this article never addressed and countered or even acknowledged?

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.

Follow this link:

Harvard Medical School Professors Uncover a Hard To Swallow Truth About ...