Category: Vaccine

Page 272«..1020..271272273274..280..»

Burlington County COVID vaccine clinics offer bivalent boosters to children five and up – The Sun Newspapers

October 19, 2022

Special to The Sun: A Burlington County health department nurse prepares to administer a COVID shot during a county vaccination clinic at the Emergency Services Training Center in Westampton.

Children as young as five-years-old can now receive the new COVID-19 bivalent booster shots at the Burlington County Health Departments weekly vaccine clinics starting Oct. 26.

The new updated boosters from Pfizer and Moderna offer stronger protection against severe illness from the BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron subvariants that are now the dominant strains circulating in New Jersey. Burlington County started administering the shots to adults and teenagers 12 and up last month when it launched its weekly vaccine clinics in Evesham, Bordentown and Westampton.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expanded emergency use authorization for the shots to children ages five through 11 last week, prompting the county to start preparations for shots for this younger population.

Residents are recommended to receive either brand of the bivalent booster if at least two months has lapsed since their primary vaccination series or their first or second booster. These recommendations replace all previous recommendations for the over five age group. The Pfizer bivalent booster may be given to those ages five and up. The Moderna bivalent booster may be given to those ages six years and up.

Burlington County Health Department Director Dr. Herb Conaway said all eligible residents should seek the added protection of the boosters as soon as possible to become better protected for likely surges in COVID-19 activity this fall and winter.

Children are back in school and cooler weather is pushing more activities indoors, so its imperative for residents to act now to get up-to-date with their vaccines and boosters, said Conaway. These shots are safe and effective and offer the best possible protection against a likely surge in COVID disease. Were also bracing for an active influenza season, so getting a seasonal flu shot is also critical.

Burlington Countys COVID-19 vaccination clinics are held three-days-a-week at rotating locations through a partnership between the County Health Department and Mobile Medical Services and Technology. All three weekly clinics are expected to have Pfizer and Moderna shots and boosters available for all eligible populations beginning Oct. 26.

The locations and times of the clinics are as follows:

Appointments for the clinics can be made online athttps://patientportal.advancedmd.com/149623/onlinescheduling/v2/providersor by calling 844-569-0390 during normal business hours.

No walk-ins are permitted.

Flu shot clinics are scheduled each Thursday at varying times and locations throughout the county. A complete schedule is available athttps://www.co.burlington.nj.us/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1929.

Burlington County is among the state leaders in COVID vaccinations, with more than 83 percent of its population of residents five and older vaccinated with their primary doses. More than 60 percent have also received at least one booster shot.

Weve made incredible progress in the fight against COVID, but we must still be vigilant and do our best to continue to guard our communities against potential surges, said Conaway. Vaccines and boosters are our best defense, which is why our county continues to make shots available at multiple locations.

Continued here:

Burlington County COVID vaccine clinics offer bivalent boosters to children five and up - The Sun Newspapers

One of the last campuses with a mandatory vaccine policy is dropping it in 2023 – National Post

October 19, 2022

Article content

TORONTO Seneca College says it will drop its mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy in January.

President David Agnew called the decision regretful but necessary in a statement posted to the colleges website Monday.

Seneca, which has campuses across the Greater Toronto Area, was one of the last post-secondary institutions in Canada with a campus-wide COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

The announcement comes a month after Ontarios Superior Court dismissed an application by two unvaccinated students asking the court to block Seneca from enforcing its policy.

People on campus will no longer be required to show proof of vaccination on Jan. 1, but the college says it is keeping its mask mandate until further notice.

Meanwhile, Western University which remains one of the last places in the country with a vaccine mandate announced Monday it was extending its masking requirement until the end of the fall term.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2022.

See the rest here:

One of the last campuses with a mandatory vaccine policy is dropping it in 2023 - National Post

covidvaccine.msdh.ms.gov

October 15, 2022

MSDH is providing Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19vaccines in the County Health Department Clinics for children and adults 6moand older. Please read the instructions before making an appointment fora first shot, second shot, third or additional shot for people with weakenedimmune systems, and booster shots.

You can now make anappointment to receive the updated COVID-19 Bivalent booster shot to provide betterprotection and boost immunity. The updated booster shot includes protectionagain currently circulating COVID-19 variant strains Omicron BA.4 and BA.5.

If you have any questions or would like totalk with someone to help you make your appointment, call the MSDH COVID-19Hotline at877-978-6453.

Primary SeriesThere are 2 vaccines available at MSDHCounty Health Departments: Pfizer and Moderna.

Eligibility:

Children and adults 6 months of age and olderare eligible to receive a primary series of Pfizer or Moderna at MSDH CountyHealth Departments

Pfizer: 2 shots given 3 weeks (21 days) apart(a third dose of Pfizer 8 weeks after the second dose is required to completethe primary series in children 6 months through 4 years of age)

Moderna: 2 shots given 4 weeks (28 days) apart

Both are safe, tested, and effective atreducing your risk of severe illness.Learn more about COVID-19 vaccines.

Additional ShotAnAdditional shot of Pfizer orModerna for People with Weakened Immune Systems (Primary Series)isavailable at MSDH County Health Departments.Eligibility:

Children 6 months and older and adults whohave a weakened immune system are eligible for an additional shot in theprimary series.

Booster ShotBooster shots ofPfizer or Moderna are available at MSDH County Health Department Clinics.

Eligibility:-

Anyone age 5 years and older is eligible for a COVID-19booster shot. If youve been fullyvaccinated with Pfizer, Moderna, Novavax, or Johnson and Johnson (Janssen) andits been the appropriate amount of time since your last shot, youre eligibleto get your COVID-19 booster.

Individuals 12 years and older are eligible for the updatedBooster shot if its been at least two months since completion of the primaryseries of COVID-19 vaccine or its been at least 2 months since the last boostershot.

If you received Johnson & JohnsonsJanssen, you can get a first booster shot with Pfizer or Moderna at least 2months after you completed your primary series with Johnson and Johnson

NOTE: You may mix and match your boostershot, which means get a booster dose with a vaccine that is different from theone you received during your primary series.Seebooster shot information for more information.

MSDH is not providing Johnson and Johnson(Janssen) vaccine shots at County Health Department Clinics. However, youcan still get a booster shot of Pfizer or Moderna vaccine if you got Johnsonand Johnson vaccine as your first shot. If you want to get Johnson andJohnson (Janssen) vaccine as your booster shot, please go to https://www.vaccines.gov/search/to find a provider who is giving boostershots of Johnson and Johnson (Janssen).

Childrens Vaccine Children ages 6mo through 17 years areeligible for Pfizer or Moderna vaccine Seevaccine recommendations for children andteenagers.

Please remember to bring your COVID-19 vaccinecard to your appointment if you have received prior shots of COVID-19 vaccine.

If you have any questions or concerns aboutthe COVID-19 vaccine or need assistance in making an appointment, please callthe MSDH COVID-19 Hotline:877-978-6453

Originally posted here:

covidvaccine.msdh.ms.gov

UW cancer researcher tells us, ‘it’s been a ride.’ She’s hopeful about cancer vaccine prospects – KUOW News and Information

October 15, 2022

Over many decades of medical breakthroughs, every now and then we hear hopeful news of possible cancer cures. But for many people, especially those who lost loved ones, the hope has been frustrated. Now, there's another positive development to report on. It concerns cancer vaccines.

Dr. Nora Disis is a University of Washington professor of Medicine and Oncology, and the director of the UW Medicine Cancer Vaccine Institute. She told KUOWs Kim Malcolm about her work.

This interview has been edited for clarity.

Kim Malcolm: You had a mention this week in a New York Times article. It had a rather provocative headline, "After Giving Up on Cancer Vaccines, Doctors Start to Find Hope." Is that an accurate overview? Did you and other doctors you know give up on cancer vaccines?

Dr. Nora Disis: I think that was a very provocative title. I at least have not given up on cancer vaccines, but I do have to say that cancer vaccines have not enjoyed the success that we've seen with other forms of cancer immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibodies. I think in the field, people like to go where drugs are working. To date, that hasn't been cancer vaccines. We only have one approved vaccine, for prostate cancer, that was actually developed here in Seattle. But we haven't had more vaccines approved for other diseases. I think that's why they started that title with people flocking away from cancer vaccines, but there's a core group of people that have been steadily working to try to figure out how to make cancer vaccines a viable treatment option for people with cancer.

We know that vaccines work by triggering an immune response in our bodies. Are these vaccines designed to work in the same way?

Absolutely. In fact, that is one of the understandings that really brought us kind of a tipping point for cancer vaccines. We now know what portions of cancer are capable of stimulating the immune system. When you think of the Covid vaccine, we had to know what parts of Covid we could target the immune system to that would be effective. We now know for a lot of common solid tumors what portions we should target with a vaccine to direct the immune response to.

Including that, are there also other areas where you're starting to see new hope for the future development of cancer vaccines?

Definitely. Now that we know what to target the immune response to. One of the other big understandings over the last decade is the type of immune response you need to kill cancer. And unlike the vaccines we get for infectious disease, which really try to create an antibody response, we know that for cancer we need to stimulate a T cell response, a cytotoxic or Killer T cell response, that can directly kill the cancer. And then the final thing, I think, that you've seen with the Covid vaccine, is we have much better vaccine delivery technologies, like messenger RNA or DNA, that give the immune system an additional tweak.

Are there specific cancers that you're focused on?

Our institute is really focused on the common cancers that most people die from-- breast, ovarian, prostate, colon, and lung cancer. And we also have a bladder cancer vaccine in development. These are vaccines that would cover about 50% of all cancers diagnosed, and those cancers are responsible for about 50% of all cancer deaths.

How far away are you from being able to develop a vaccine for any one of those cancers?

With some of them, we're pretty close. We actually have vaccines in phase one and phase two clinical trials. Others of them are still in development, but we usually hope to get a vaccine into the clinic within two years of starting to work on it. We look at vaccines in three different ways. Using a vaccine to actually treat cancer-- that's giving the vaccine to someone who currently has cancer. Usually, in that case, we team up the vaccine with other types of anti-cancer therapies. Then our largest programs are in vaccines to prevent cancer from coming back. In many of these tumors, take breast cancer, you can make the cancer go completely away, but at certain stages, or with certain types of breast cancer, you're at very high risk of that cancer coming back. I think vaccines will fit right into that niche of being used in patients who've received optimal treatment to prevent disease from reoccurring.

But a big breakthrough is within the last five years. Our group and others have started seeing if we could develop vaccines to prevent the development of cancers. We would target those for people at high risk, let's say people with a genetic mutation that puts them at high risk for developing cancer, or people who've had lesions that predispose you to develop cancer, like an adenoma predisposing you to develop colon cancer, for example.

It sounds like you've got more and more grounds for hope as you continue your work with your colleagues. I'm wondering what you need to make progress at this point on cancer vaccines.

I think the biggest thing we need is patients enrolling in clinical trials. Those are the real heroes. We can do everything in the lab, create a vaccine and manufacture it, and write a clinical trial. But if we don't have the right patient populations enrolling, it really slows down the work. And more and more, were identifying these targets. Vaccines are becoming or will probably be like precision medicine, where they're going to be targeted to a specific patient population. But that money, patients enrolling in clinical trials, and money to get the work through, those are the things that really speed up advancement and vaccine development.

As you know, vaccines have become a political battleground for quite a few people in recent times. Is that a concern for you, that just even having the term vaccine out there, or clinical trial, that people would shy away from it and not want to get involved?

I used to think about that, but we have a very important word before the vaccine. That word is cancer. In my experience, the fear of cancer trumps any fear of vaccines. We actually have lots of patients who are interested in cancer vaccines. Our issue is just having the right vaccine that a patient would qualify for. But we haven't had people turn us down over fear of vaccines because I think most people who are coming to us are really trying to survive their cancer, or improve their chances of surviving their cancer. So far, we haven't seen that phenomenon of being afraid to get a vaccine. And usually, the vaccines have many fewer side effects than something like chemotherapy, so people are pleasantly surprised at how easy they are to take.

When do you think cancer vaccines will become widely available? And who do you think could benefit from them first?

I think cancer vaccines will become more widely available within the next five to eight years. The reason why I say this is that if you looked at active clinical trials in the United States, clinical trials with cancer vaccines are pretty up there in terms of being common, with many people adding them to current immunotherapy for cancer.

The people who will first benefit are those who are undergoing cancer treatment, where people will use cancer vaccines to try to help boost the immune response even further with other immune therapies. I think we're also going to make traction with that group of patients where we're trying to prevent disease recurrence. Those are the two populations that I think in the next five to eight years, we'll see cancer vaccines becoming part of standard of care.

With that third group, where we're trying to develop vaccines to just prevent the development of cancer, and people who have not yet had cancer, I think we still have a little way. We might be talking about 10 years from now before we see a vaccine for patients at high risk for a particular cancer.

I'm wondering if you think that you will still be working in this field if and when these vaccines become widely available to the public. And I'm wondering what that would be like for you.

I will definitely still be working in this field. And it will really be a dream. I mean, when I started in this field 25 years ago the big question was, does the immune system have anything to do with cancer? Can cancer be recognized by the human immune system? That was the big question. And just in that 25 years, we've gone from that being the major question, to immune therapies, those immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, now being standard of care treatment for many types of cancers, and their sole function is to stimulate the immune system. So, I think we're very close to cancer vaccines following up on that success of those immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. And to think that in one career, we went from zero to 100%. I mean, that's just indicative of how fast science and technology moves. It's been a ride, let me tell ya!

Listen to the interview by clicking the play button above.

Continue reading here:

UW cancer researcher tells us, 'it's been a ride.' She's hopeful about cancer vaccine prospects - KUOW News and Information

Is It Too Early to Tell How the Flu Vaccine Aligns With Current Strains? – NBC San Diego

October 15, 2022

Were about halfway through October and San Diego County health officials are saying 1,000 flu cases have already been reported. Thats a quarter of last years entire season.

Traditionally, the effectiveness of the flu vaccine is around 40-60%, according to the CDC, which is a range that is important to keep people out of the hospital. Despite the statistic, not everyone gets the shot.

On the heels of a flu outbreak at Patrick Henry High School and Del Norte High School, Deputy Health Directory Cameron Kaiser told NBC 7 Thursday the flu is here and its here early.

Its cold and flu season again, which means you could be left wondering which virus is causing your symptoms. Heres what you need to know.

For locals like Greg Liewald, hes only received the flu vaccine once and doesnt plan to do it again.

I dont feel like it has affected me in such a negative way, Liewald said. Its such a crapshoot that the strains correct anyway, I believe. Thats at least from what I know. Or what I think I know, I guess. Thats probably better said.

Edna Wright and Charles VanRickely say the opposite and believe its whats kept them from getting the virus.

Ive never gotten the flu, so that doesnt mean it will keep me from getting the flu but it certainly helps, so I believe in getting the flu shot, Wright said.

But what about the vaccine itself? It takes months to manufacture, so every year, medical researchers making the formula try to predict which strain will be the prominent one come flu season. So, hows it doing this year? Its too early in the flu season to tell, according to the county, but the best line of defense remains the same not only to get the flu shot, but to protect yourself by washing your hands frequently, disinfecting surfaces, and if youre sick, limiting contact with others.

For those who do contract it, the following symptoms are possible: fever, coughing, sore throat and muscle aches.

Ive not gotten sick and it always makes, makes me feel like Im protecting myself and thats good, Wright said.

VanRIckley says it gives him peace of mind, too.

Just more comfortable, VanRickley said.

With two schools in the county experiencing flu outbreaks, county officials say they would not be surprised if others emerge.

While the season is off to a strong start, the CDC says the flu seasons peak between December and February, but could last as late as May. Since the start of the pandemic, the timing and duration of flu activity have been less predictable.

See more here:

Is It Too Early to Tell How the Flu Vaccine Aligns With Current Strains? - NBC San Diego

MIA on vaccines, vindication and her visions of Jesus: People fear me for some reason – The Guardian

October 15, 2022

For 20 years, MIA has existed at the intersection of vilification and vindication. The London-born, Sri Lanka-raised rapper and singer has spent her entire career fighting perceived injustices in the world, from the underreporting and whitewashing of the Tamil genocide to the incarceration of her friend, the WikiLeaks whistleblower Julian Assange. She also has terminal foot-in-mouth disease, and is prone to flippant, occasionally outright offensive trolling in the press and on Twitter.

At the heart of it all has been the music itself an electrifying body of work that is innovative, influential and, to this day, totally singular. Travis Scott, one of the most successful living rappers, has listed her as one of his favourite artists; in 2020, she was awarded an MBE for services to music.

Her sixth album, Mata, which is out today, is her most reflective record yet, looking over the ups and downs of her career with an attitude that suggests no love is lost for those who criticised her views. I tried to make you see I was telling the truth, she sings on her new single, Beep, and, given her warnings about the overreach of tech companies and her pioneering of abrasive noise-pop years ahead of Yeezus and the likes of 100 Gecs youre inclined to believe her. Still, all that reflection doesnt mean she has lost her confrontational spirit, nor deterred her from tweeting a statement on Wednesday night, about the rightwing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, that left many people aghast: If Alex jones pays for lying shouldnt every celebrity pushing vaccines pay too?

Anyone who has been following MIA, born Mathangi Arulpragasam, at any point in her career knows that this kind of comment is par for the course. Speaking over Zoom from Los Angeles two days before Mata is released and about an hour after the Jones tweet the 47-year-old rapper is often erudite and, just as frequently, profoundly troubling and confusing, prone to going on tangents about the blob what she calls the unruly, manipulative version of the internet we use today and sharing ultra-detailed history lessons on Assanges extradition and the history of the Sri Lankan civil war.

The album itself doesnt take up much of our conversation her answer to a question about one song ends up down a rabbit hole that leads to were going to go to Mars and were going to evolve the human species. Instead MIA gives full rein to her opinions on other topics, from her newfound Christianity and identity politics to, yes, Covid vaccines. Unlike many stars of her ilk, she doesnt shy from answering any question, and the team who linger throughout the Zoom call her publicist and a rep from Salxco, her new management firm, which also represents the Weeknd and Doja Cat never attempts to intervene, even when the conversation turns to thornier topics.

Mata may be MIAs most contemplative record, recalling lyrical themes from every part of her career but its very clearly not an attempt to re-enter the mainstream pop world she was orbiting in the 2010s. Its a rhythmic, sample-driven album that often eschews simple pop melody for anarchic schoolyard chants and beats that recall reggaeton and funk carioca, as well as lyrics that seem to reference the prescience of her past work. But she says that she hasnt wasted time stewing over the fact that history has proved her right on some of the subjects she talked about years ago, such as the NSA spying on US citizens, or the plight of the Tamil people. No matter who you are, the universe is moving so fast these days that its almost like your history is irrelevant, she says. I feel vindicated when I look at the craziness of the modern-day world, and Im like: Oh, 10 years ago, if they didnt put that guy in jail [Assange], and kill that dude [it is unclear who she means], we wouldnt really have this now.

During the process of making Mata, MIAs sense of self was in a state of intense upheaval. In 2015, after shooting a video in India for the single Borders, she fell ill and experienced a vision of Jesus Christ that caused her to become very confused creatively. She thinks the vision was a result of someone doing some sort of mantra on her. I didnt think it was effective and it turned out that it was effective. As she slowly began to surrender to the idea that she might die, I said: OK, thats fine, Im happy that I lived and Ive experienced and did my best. As Id given in to dying, then I had the vision.

After that, MIA felt a tension between the Hinduism she had embraced in recent years and her new Christianity. Its not like I was into the deity in Hinduism that was about wealth I was specifically into Matangi, a deity about creativity and arts, she says. Faced with having to cut that off and embrace the concept of Jesus Christ, I was having an existential crisis.

Mata, then, is partially about surrendering into the idea that the conflict is within myself, she says. Some songs, such as The One, seem to embrace the idea of existing on a righteous path; others, such as FIASOM (which stands for Freedom Is a State of Mind, and is pronounced fearsome) and Zoo Girl, channel what she calls the vibrancy of her Tamil heritage. Two years after her vision, she points out, came the pandemic. That narrative is very Christian its not a Hindu thing, its a Christian thing, and I think thats why it happened, she says. It prepares you for something thats about to come. You have to use a different rulebook to understand what is happening.

It would have been easy for MIA to mount a comeback based on the idea that she was mistreated by the media and the general public in the early days of her career; in recent years, it has been acknowledged that the early treatment of confrontational female stars such as Sinad OConnor and the Chicks was awash with misogyny. Everyone is more scared of me than any of those artists, she says. Were living through a time where people are seeing the hyper-inflated nature of capitalism and the destruction it causes, and even though I dont have that kind of monetary power, I do feel like people fear me for some reason.

She has an idea about why the media has been so reluctant to rehabilitate her. Outrage over comments such as her Alex Jones tweet, she says emphatically, ignores the fact that lying and truth have been constant themes in her career. Although she has been vocal about specific issues, such as human rights in Bangladesh and the Tamil war, her ultimate goal, she says, has been to expose the fact that people in power are constantly operating through the use of deception. Im not here to discuss things with ignorant people who dont know what Ive done, she says. I took a hit for [talking about the Tamil genocide], because it wasnt cool enough for 15 years before identity politics and this word oppression became a buzzword. It wasnt cool. So I was deleted all through that 15 years.

Of Jones, she says, today, youve got some white guy who apparently lied and made some families feel terrible, who now has to pay $1bn because he denied someones real experience, real loss and real emotional trauma. Although she believes its terrible that the Sandy Hook families were subjected to Joness slander about the murder of their children, she invokes the 146,000 unaccounted-for Tamil civilians who dont get the same kind of empathy. If were going to have a scapegoat in society where somebodys going to pay for [lying about atrocities], then I would like to bring the same sort of court case against every western publication that said only 40,000 Tamils were killed in the last days of the war.

MIA is acutely aware of the blowback she will get for her tweets about Jones, but its clear that her resentment runs deeper than any outrage cycle or Twitter spat the result, she says, of 15 years of media coverage saying that Tamils dont count, our feelings dont count, we dont care about our dead ones or the ones that are missing. Im gonna have to deal with, like, a bunch of ignorant sheeples going she puts on an American accent Oh my God, girl, delete your Twitter. What are you talking about? You cant say that to me after I have paid real prices throughout my career.

So why is she a vaccine sceptic? Over the course of our conversation, she repeatedly links the subject to big pharma and the US medical system, the cost of living crisis and the general publics access to information, areas of vital basic human need that are exploited for monetary gain.

The language they use to attack anybody is to say: Oh, shes an anti-vaxxer or blah blah blah. And its like, no, not really, she says. I know three people who have died from taking the vaccine and I know three people who have died from Covid. This is in my life, in my experience. If anyone is going to deny that experience and gaslight me, saying: No, thats not your experience, then what is the point of anything?

(In March 2022, a major study by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no link between the number of deaths following vaccination and receiving two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine; in figures published in February 2022, 15 people in the UK died following receiving the vaccine. The WHO reports the Covid worldwide death toll to be in excess of 6.5m.)

MIA continues: What is the existence that you are trying to protect by giving me a vaccine if I cant even have an experience and process that information in my own brain and come to some sort of conclusion? And live within a society where I have to make choices every day?

This idea of a freedom without any genuine choice comes up several times in our conversation. Theres this weird idea that were all free, and that we fight for everything, and we can say what we want, but on the other hand, I feel like theres even more of a crackdown on that.

Along the same lines, she sees identity politics as ignoring fundamentals of human existence, which still arent being met. I feel like there has to be priorities the basic human need is food, water, shelter and clothing, she says. Identity politics and all this other stuff comes after you have the comfort of those things. Once you have healthy food and your brains working properly and your bodys working properly, then you can sit there and think about whether you want to have a drink and go out or be a certain thing or think a certain way.

She cites the example of the movement to defund the police in the US, suggesting that this will cause poverty and hardship. Even [with] the police force, who were supposed to not like, you had people losing their livelihoods and losing their jobs and cant pay rent, families losing their houses because theyre threatened with this choice of following orders or not following orders, she says. That is actually really happening on our doorstep, like this is not happening in Sri Lanka, this is happening in the west, this is happening in your neighbourhood.

This is the problem, she says, with cancel culture. I think everyone should be having open conversations we dont all have to, like, build effigies of people and burn them in the street for saying something, going after them like Guy Fawkes, because of fear of being seen as the other.

Our time is up. As has been the case throughout her career, this conversation with MIA sparks more questions than answers. If theres a sympathetic angle on some of her more alarming views, its that after experiencing the displacement of her family in Sri Lanka and the discombobulating effects of fame, it is understandable that she would search widely to make sense of her experiences not least in her embrace of Christianity. There may never be enough time for her to explain how she feels about the state of the world, but one truism holds, she says: Id like to be there when the shit goes down revolution.

Mata is out now on Island

This article was amended on 14 October 2022. MIA was born in London and spent her childhood in Sri Lanka, not the other way around as a previous version said.

Go here to read the rest:

MIA on vaccines, vindication and her visions of Jesus: People fear me for some reason - The Guardian

Coronavirus Omicron variant, vaccine, and case numbers in the United States: Oct. 14, 2022 – Medical Economics

October 15, 2022

Patient deaths: 1,064,798

Total vaccine doses distributed: 871,852,135

Patients whove received the first dose: 265,111,489

Patients whove received the second dose: 226,200,755

% of population fully vaccinated (both doses, not including boosters): 68.1%

% tied to Omicron variant: 100%

% tied to Other: 0%

Visit link:

Coronavirus Omicron variant, vaccine, and case numbers in the United States: Oct. 14, 2022 - Medical Economics

Biden admin still pushing COVID vaccine mandate for military: It’s unlawful and hurts national security – Fox News

October 15, 2022

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On national television, Biden administration spokesperson John Kirby mounted a feeble attempt to explain the presidents COVID-19 vaccine mandate for the military.Kirby, a retired Navy admiral, had no acceptable answers when pressed about the administrations "folly" and the perilous impact the mandate is already having on our national security.

Remarkably, Kirby perpetuated the narrative that the militarys mandate must remain in place while admitting with a straight face that he was quarantined for 10 days due to his current bout with COVID-19, despite being vaccinated and double boosted.

The unrelenting push to remove thousands of religious service members from the military for their sincerely held objections to taking the COVID-19 vaccine should be classified as a clear dereliction of duty by the Biden administration. The president himself declared "the pandemic is over."

A U.S. Marine receives the Moderna coronavirus vaccine at Camp Foster on April 28, 2021, in Ginowan, Japan. (Carl Court/Getty Images)

As Kirby revealed on national television, COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective in preventing infection or the spread of the virus. According to the Centers for Disease Control, service members who were only vaccinated once last fall are still at risk of severe illness. And boosters are not mandated by the Department of Defense.

HOUSE REPUBLICANS DEMAND ANSWERS ON PENTAGON COVID VACCINE MANDATE AMID PUNISHMENTS FOR UNVAXXED SOLDIERS

At this point, there is no "compelling government interest" in vaccinating this small percentage of religious service members because there is no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines promote the "health and safety" of our force.

John Kirby holds a news briefing at the Pentagon on March 9, 2022, in Arlington, Virginia. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

In April 2021, top military leaders admitted that "the U.S. military has successfully continued operations and kept our forces safe during the pandemic by implementing other force health protection guidelines." Despite this statement, on Aug. 9, 2021, Kirby had an unusual message regarding the mandate, "You can consider this memo not just a warning order to the services but to the troops themselves," with the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee commenting that, "Some may try and criticize the Secretarys decision, using anti-vax arguments that are not supported by facts or science to politicize the conversation. These desperate attention seekers must be ignored."

While service members of faith are being denied accommodations and are presently prevented from doing their jobs and maintaining their careers, the Air Force is willingly accommodating service members who are unvaccinated for COVID-19 for medical reasons.

To any reasonable person, the hypocrisy and unlawfulness is clear.

ARMY PENALIZING SOLDIERS SEEKING RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS TO VAX MANDATE: TECHNIQUE OF COERCION

In a recent decision in a lawsuit brought by United Airlines employees, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judge James C. Ho provided the best explanation of what the real objective is with these mandates.

In his concurrence, Judge Ho stated that United Airlines placed its employees with religious objections to taking the COVID-19 vaccine on indefinite, unpaid leave "to coerce its employees into violating their religious beliefs and whats worse, to do so irrevocably and permanently."

Judge Ho rightly concluded that Uniteds business decision had nothing to do with safety, but rather "the real reason for the vaccine mandate and indefinite unpaid leave policy is virtue signaling and currying political favor."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Its time for the Biden administration to put its false, damaging narrative to rest. As the Supreme Court urged this past fall, "even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten." The Supreme Court has also held that where it is "only conduct motivated by religious conviction that bears the weight of the governmental restrictions," then there "can be no serious claim that those interests justify the [militarys COVID-19 vaccination mandate.]"

At this point, the Department of Defense should be more concerned with its own 100% compliance with the Constitution rather than 100% vaccination compliance. How will religious liberty ever be preserved if our own executive branch is permitted to overtly dishonor it?

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Danielle Runyan is counsel for First Liberty Institute, a nonprofit law firm exclusively dedicated to defending religious liberty for all Americans, and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, Spence v. Austin. Read more at FirstLiberty.org.

Follow this link:

Biden admin still pushing COVID vaccine mandate for military: It's unlawful and hurts national security - Fox News

Page 272«..1020..271272273274..280..»