Category: Vaccine

In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19 vaccines. Since 2008, her primary focus has been glyphosate and sulfur, but in the last year, she took a deep-dive into the science of these novel injections and recently published an excellent paper1on this topic.

To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], its an insanely reckless thing that theyve done,she says.My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].

So, I really dug into the research literature by the people whove developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I dont see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you weigh the good against the bad, I cant see how they could possibly be winning, from what Ive seen.

Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come

Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Seneff cites research2showing deaths are 14.6 times more frequent during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who arent vaccinated. That is extraordinary. You canread the full paper here.

Other data,3,4reviewed in the video above, show that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. Interestingly, Seneff believes she may have discovered why. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate.

I immediately suspected glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,Seneff says. Ive written a book on glyphosate called Toxic Legacy, and I have an entire chapter in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a train wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is weak, your body has to overreact to the virus. It cant kill the virus.

So, it ends up [causing] collateral damage and wrecking your tissues. You get into this cytokine storm kind of situation where you destroy your lungs and you cant cope. Its not really the virus. Its the immune reaction to the virus thats killing you, and thats because your immune system is too weak. If you have a strong innate immune system, I believe you wouldnt even get symptoms from COVID-19.

When you look at the statistics on which countries are hit hard and just cant get ahead of this virus, theyre clearly the countries that use a lot of glyphosate and developing biofuels based on glyphosate-exposed plants. So, I think thats a critical piece of the puzzle as well. Glyphosate is in the atmosphere [and] people are breathing it. So now youre getting a direct attack on the lungs immune system, which makes you very susceptible to COVID.

Ultimately, Seneff believes, as I do, that the COVID-19 vaccines will end up killing far more people than the disease itself, and will in fact make the disease worse. Seneff cites a disturbing case history of a cancer patient in the U.K. who was treated for severe COVID-19 for 101 days.

The antibody cocktails they gave him didnt work, and after his death, they concluded that the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in his body had a dozen different mutations in the spike protein. Somehow, his body figured out how to evade the antibodies, which is a critical piece of the puzzle.

I think the vaccines are doing the same thing, Seneff says, adding that, among the immune compromised, only 17% of vaccinated individuals actually produce antibodies.5Surprisingly, these people may actually have drawn the short end of the stick. The antibodies may not work because their immune function is low, thereby allowing the virus to build resistance and mutate.

I think you have a lot of immune compromised people in a country where glyphosate is destroying peoples immune system, and that gives tremendous opportunity for the virus to mutate. The vaccine is going to accelerate that process because were vaccinating immune compromised people left and right.

COVID-19 Vaccines Are a Public Health Disaster

The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through phases 2 and 3 of clinical testing.

The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible for this vaccine to be adequately tested for safety and efficacy.

Hundreds of millions of people are now being vaccinated around the world, based on nothing more than preliminary efficacy data. Disturbingly, while sudden death is one apparent side effect, the vast majority of side effects wont be known until a decade or more from now.

Seneff predicts that in the next 10 to 15 years, well see a sudden spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.

Its a nightmare,she says.And I can see how it can happen. Basically, the vaccine is so unbelievably unnatural, and it has a single-minded goal, which is to get your body to produce antibodies to the spike protein. The RNA has been manipulated. Its not natural RNA because it has methyl-pseudouridine on it And the goal is to keep it alive.

Normally, if you get injected with RNA, you have enzymes in your system, in your tissues, that will immediately break it down. Your body knows it must get rid of the RNA. What you do with the vaccine is you make sure [your body] cant get at it

Then theres the lipid [that the RNA is encased in]. The lipids are very abnormal, very weird Theyre not natural but they have some cholesterol in there, probably to help it look like a natural LDL particle so that your cells will take it up. Its not being taken up by the ACE2 receptor.

Its not being taken up the same way that the virus is being taken up. Its a totally different mechanism that brings it into all the cells. Youve gone past all the mucosal membranes. Usually, a virus is going to come into the lungs or any kind of cavity where theres a mucosal system thats going to hit the virus first.

The virus [will trigger] your natural mucosal system to respond to it and clear it if youre a healthy person, and thats the end of it. [With the vaccine], we never get a chance to do that. Youre just getting it shot right into your muscle, past all the barriers and the muscle goes crazy sending out all kinds of alarms.

Understanding Your Immune System

As your cells start producing the viral spike proteins, your immune cells rally to mop up the proteins and dump them into your lymphatic system. This is why many report swollen lymph nodes under the arms. This is also a sign of breast cancer. The antibody response is part of your humoral immunity. You also have cellular immunity, which is part of your innate immune system.

Your innate immune system is very powerful. And, if youre healthy, it can clear viruses without ever producing a single antibody. Antibodies are actually a second-tier effect when your innate immune system fails. The problem is your innate immune system is definitely going to fail if you get a COVID-19 shot, because its bypassing all of the areas where your innate immune system would be brought to bear.

Your body will essentially believe that the innate immune system has failed, which means it must bring in the backup cavalry. In essence, your body is now over-reacting to something that isnt true. Youre not actually infected with a virus and your innate immune system has not failed, but your body is forced to respond as if both are true.

How COVID-19 Vaccine Circumvents Healthy Immune Responses

But theres more. As explained by Seneff, the synthetic RNA in the mRNA vaccines contains a nucleotide called methyl-pseudouridine, which your body cannot break down, and the RNA is programmed to trigger maximum protein production. So, were looking at completely untested manipulation of RNA.

It is very important to recognize that this is a genetically engineered mRNA for the spike protein. It is in no way shape or form the same that SARS-CoV-2 produces. Its been significantly altered to avoid being metabolized by your body. Additionally, the spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA locks into your ACE2 receptor.

This is because the genetically engineered NEW spike protein has additional prolines inserted that prevent the receptors from properly closing, which then cause you to downregulate ACE2. Thats partially how you end up with problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.6,7

As noted in a 2020 paper,8theres a pivotal link between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. People with ACE2 deficiency tend to be more prone to severe COVID-19. The spike protein suppresses ACE2,9making the deficiency even worse. As it turns out, the vaccines essentially do the same thing.

How Long Might Effects Last?

As mentioned, RNA is highly perishable, so to get it past the enzymes that would normally break down free mRNA, its encased in a lipid nanoparticle combined with polyethylene glycol or PEG. The PEG helps protect the RNA from breaking down. The RNA can easily enter the cell via natural endocytosis pathways, taking advantage of the nanoparticle design made to look like an LDL particle.

They strategically chose a cationic lipid, meaning its positively charged. Usually you have phospholipids in your membranes that are negatively charged, Seneff explains. The problem with cationic lipids is they disturb the plasma membrane and cause an immune response.

However, that may also be a key reason for why they were used. Typically, conventional vaccines contain an aluminum adjuvant to initiate an immune response. Aluminum was not appropriate for the COVID-19 vaccines, but the cationic lipids serve a similar function spectacularly well.

Being extremely toxic to the cell membranes, the positively charged lipids trigger immune cells to rush in to aid the cells and mop up the spike protein now being produced, while also being the vehicle that allows the RNA to slip into the cells. Once inside the cell, the mRNA delivers the instructions to produce enormous amounts of spike proteins.

Importantly, theres no telling how long these instructions will persist. Manufacturers are guessing the synthetic RNA may survive in the human body for about six months, but we really dont know if thats true or not.

Again, the alterations theyve done to the synthetic RNA are meant to prevent it from breaking down. It could be years or even decades that these spike proteins are being produced, and you will find out shortly why this is a really bad scenario.

The really worrisome thing, which I talk about in the paper, is theres potential for it to become integrated into your DNA,Seneff says. If that happens, it will last your entire lifetime, and you may pass this new genetic code on to your offspring.

Tracing Spike Protein From Cells to Lymph to Spleen

As explained by Seneff, your immune cells mop up mRNA and spike protein and dump them into your lymphatic system. From there, they make their way into your spleen, where they can remain for quite a long time.

There are all these different immune cells that have different roles, but its the dendritic cells and the macrophages that are initially going into the muscle, picking up the mRNA, taking it over to the lymph system, traveling through the lymph system to the spleen and piling it up there. The spleen was the highest concentration of all the organs they looked at in animal studies. The liver was second.

It wasnt the COVID-19 vaccine, but it was a messenger RNA vaccine. So, it was the same concept. The other vaccines, the ones that are based on a DNA vector, they also go to the spleen. I think they like it when they see that its going to the spleen because you have these germinal centers in the spleen that are focus groups for making antibodies.

So these dendritic cells are in these germinal centers in the spleen, and then they bring in the B-cells and T-cells, and those are the ones that make and perfect the antibodies, because you need to go through a whole training mode to get the antibiotics to be exactly matched to that particular spike protein. That happens predominantly in the spleen.

Potential Vaccine Shedding Mechanism Revealed

Seneff also sheds light on the mysterious reports of unvaccinated individuals experiencing unusual bleeding symptoms after spending time in proximity to a newly vaccinated person. She believes this may be due to exosomes being released from the lungs.

If you are a person whos producing these exosomes from your spleen and shipping them out, theres no reason why you cant ship them out to the lungs. In fact, theyve shown experimentally that those exosomes do get released from the lungs,Seneff says.

So, to be clear, whats being shed or spread by vaccinated individuals is the spike protein which is itself toxic not the SARS-CoV-2. So, its not an infection but rather the shedding of a toxic protein.

If youre breathing it in, you could be getting an increased risk, it seems to me. I mean, it sounds really farfetched, but it looks like it could happen, just from the logic of what goes on in biology. It could happen that you would breathe in these exosomes containing these misfolded prion proteins, which are not good for you, and exactly what happens when they go into the lungs, I dont know. I have no idea.

Can mRNA Vaccines Change Your DNA? That Is the Question

Getting back to the potential issue of gene editing, Ive been accused of being scientifically ignorant for stating that COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines but rather a form of gene therapy. But when you delve into the genetics and molecular biology of this vaccine you discover that they are in fact a form of a stealth gene editing tool that can change your DNA and integrate instructions to make even more spike proteins.

Its counterintuitive because, typically, mRNA cannot be integrated directly into your genes because you need reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase converts RNA back into DNA (reverse transcription). Seneff, however, discovered theres a wide variety of reverse transcriptase systems already embedded in our DNA, which makes this possible. She explains:

There was this long period of time in which we had the mantra that transcription is DNA to RNA to protein. Thats basic biology DNA, RNA, protein. But then, in 1970, David Baltimore at MIT discovered reverse transcriptase in retroviruses (RNA tumor viruses), which he won the Nobel Prize for.

It turns out, and I didnt know this until I started digging into these vaccines, that we actually have plenty of reverse transcriptase in our own cells. We have plenty of it. And its these long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) that are able to take our RNA back to DNA and to put that DNA back into the genome.

LINEs and SINEs are sequences of nucleotides, pieces of DNA, and they make up a huge percentage of the genome. For example, LINE1 is 10% of your genome. Most of the time theyre inactive and scientists were puzzled about what they actually do. Theyre rather strange, as they fold DNA backward and stick it back in different areas. For example, in people with Alzheimers, the amyloid beta protein gets duplicated all over the place in their genome.

They get like a big fat genome with extra copies with different variations in those copies. And they do that through RNA,Seneff says.So, you have a mechanism for evolution. The primary mechanism, I would guess, is through taking the DNA, turning it into RNA, mutating the RNA because RNA mutates much more easily than DNA does, and then turning it back into DNA and sticking it back into the genome.

In a nutshell, LINEs and SINEs appear to be activated when an alternative solution for a problem is needed. One such problem could be glyphosate exposure. When the body is too sick to function normally, it finds a way around the problem by mutating proteins. Its a process that we use to deal with environmental toxic chemicals that were confronted with generally, Seneff says.

So, in summary, mRNA can be reverse transcribed and converted back to DNA by LINEs and SINEs in your body. This cloned DNA can then be integrated into your genome. In this way, it truly is genetic editing.

Are We Creating a Generation of Super-Spreaders?

What comes next is truly chilling. Seneff cites research10showing that sperm has this ability to take exogenous mRNA, either from a virus or an mRNA vaccine, and reverse transcribe it into DNA and then produce plasmids that contain this cloned DNA. The sperm then releases these plasmids around the egg, which takes them up.

The egg hangs on to those plasmids and puts the new code into the cells of the growing fetus. Hypothetically, a man having been vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine could produce a child born with the genetic code to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

This is not a good thing, because this means the child will not have antibodies against the spike protein. Since its part of their genetic code, it registers as one of their own proteins and their body wont produce antibodies against it. If that child is exposed to SARS-CoV-2, their immune system wont react at all. What happens next is anyones guess, but its bound to be severely problematic in one way or another.

Exactly how sick theyll get or whether theyll get sick at all, I dont know,Seneff says, but their immune system wont react and theyll be able to carry that virus for their entire life and then pass [that genomic trait] on down to their children

Now, if I dont react to [the virus] and I let it grow, what happens? Do I get sick? To what extent is the illness [COVID-19] the consequence of the immune response, rather than the virus itself? We dont know that, really, but many say the real problem is the overactive immune response.

People are dying of the immune response to COVID, theyre not dying from the virus. The virus is not killing them. Its the immune response to the virus thats killing them. So, if you dont have an immune response, what happens? Nobody knows.

Even if such a child were to be unaffected by the virus, we could be looking at a serious problem, as they could turn into lifelong super-spreaders and a chronic hazard to everyone around them. At least thats what happened in cows.

Seneff recounts a story of herds plagued by a viral diarrhea. They finally realized that killer calves were the problem. Calves were being born that had viral protein integrated into their genome. When exposed to the virus, these calves, unable to clear the virus naturally, then spread it to the adult cows, which got sick.

I dont see why the same thing couldnt happen with COVID that a baby could be born who has this humanized version of that protein, catches the [wild] virus and then it spreads it to the adult population,Seneff says.

Such children would be true super-spreaders, and the indoctrination were currently seeing, where children are told their mere presence could pose a mortal risk to the people they love, would then turn into grim reality. The calves in question were euthanized to safeguard the rest of the herds. How would we address human equivalents?

Hopefully, this nightmare scenario will not occur, but it appears biologically possible, and that is the problem. The fact that the available science allows for this kind of speculation is reason enough to put the brakes on this vaccination campaign. We have no clue what the long-term consequences are. We dont even know what the short-term consequences are, other than more vaccinated people are dying, collectively, compared to unvaccinated ones.

Spike Protein Appears Highly Problematic

A particularly fascinating part of Seneffs paper addresses the toxicity of the spike protein. A key problem with all of these gene-based COVID-19 vaccines is that the spike protein itself appears toxic, and your body is now a spike protein-producing factory.

Right. They have done studies where they only expose the [animal] to the spike protein, showing it was toxic in the brain and the blood vessels. So, its causing immune reactions all by itself that is damaging to the tissues.

Its basically a toxic molecule, and I think its toxic possibly because of it being a prion protein

Im going to do more research on it. I dont know enough yet, but it looks horrendous to me. I think it may be the most worrisome thing. There are two big things that are going to happen in the future.

Theyre going to take time [to develop], so were not going to see it immediately. And, of course, were not going to blame the vaccine because rates will start going up for these horrible diseases and no one will link them to it.

Why Spike Protein May Cause Serious Neurodegenerative Disease

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CKD), the human version of mad cow disease, is a prion disease. Other human forms of prion disease include Alzheimers, Parkinsons and Lou Gehrigs disease (ALS). You have all these horrible neurodegenerative diseases and each one is tied to specific prion proteins, Seneff says. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein also appears to be a prion protein, although this has yet to be thoroughly verified.

Disturbingly, the spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccines, due to the modifications made, may make it more of a prion than the spike protein in the actual virus, and a more effective one.

Papers are showing that those germinal centers in the spleen are a primary source of the prion proteins that eventually get taken up the vagus nerve and delivered to the brainstem nuclei. Thats how you can get Parkinsons disease, for example

Theres so much we need to learn, but it looks to me like its a setup here. Theyre really inviting this kind of thing to happen with these vaccines, where theyre focusing on those germinal centers [because] those are the very same place where these prion proteins often get started.

Why Long-Term Neurological Damage Is To Be Expected

In her paper, Seneff describes key characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests its a prion:11

Neurological symptoms associated with COVID-19, such as headache, nausea and dizziness, encephalitis and fatal brain blood clots are all indicators of damaging viral effects on the brain. Buzhdygan et al. (2020) proposed that primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells could cause these symptoms

In an in vitro study of the blood-brain barrier, the S1 component of the spike protein promoted loss of barrier integrity, suggesting that the spike protein acting alone triggers a pro-inflammatory response in brain endothelial cells, which could explain the neurological consequences of the disease.

The implications of this observation are disturbing because the mRNA vaccines induce synthesis of the spike protein, which could theoretically act in a similar way to harm the brain. The spike protein generated endogenously by the vaccine could also negatively impact the male testes, as the ACE2 receptor is highly expressed in Leydig cells in the testes

Prion diseases are a collection of neurodegenerative diseases that are induced through the misfolding of important bodily proteins, which form toxic oligomers that eventually precipitate out as fibrils causing widespread damage to neurons

Furthermore, researchers have identified a signature motif linked to susceptibility to misfolding into toxic oligomers, called the glycine zipper motif Prion proteins become toxic when the -helices misfold as -sheets, and the protein is then impaired in its ability to enter the membrane.

Glycines within the glycine zipper transmembrane motifs in the amyloid- precursor protein (APP) play a central role in the misfolding of amyloid- linked to Alzheimers disease. APP contains a total of four GxxxG motifs. When considering that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is a transmembrane protein, and that it contains five GxxxG motifs in its sequence,12it becomes extremely plausible that it could behave as a prion.

One of the GxxxG sequences is present within its membrane fusion domain. Recall that the mRNA vaccines are designed with an altered sequence that replaces two adjacent amino acids in the fusion domain with a pair of prolines.

This is done intentionally in order to force the protein to remain in its open state and make it harder for it to fuse with the membrane. This seems to us like a dangerous step towards misfolding potentially leading to prion disease

A paper published by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to many known proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions.

Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike proteins S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic aggregates and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.

So, in summary, the take-home here is that COVID-19 vaccines, offered to hundreds of millions of people, are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, leading to neurodegenerative diseases.

Vaccine Remedy May Be Worse Than the Disease

In her paper, Seneff goes into far more detail in her description of the spike protein as a metabolic poison. While I recommend readingSeneffs paperin its entirety, Ive extracted key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to lung damage and heart and brain diseases:13

The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality The in vivo studies they referred to had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

Follow this link:

Covid Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease - LewRockwell

Kyle Warner is 29 years old and was at the peak of his career as a professional mountain bike racer when, in June 2021, he got his second dose of Pfizers COVID-19 shot. He suffered a reaction so severe that, as of October, he was still spending days in bed, easily overwhelmed by too much mental or physical exertion.

Warner shared his detailed experience with John Campbell, a retired nurse and teacher based in England, and headed to Washington, D.C., in early November 2021 to get the word out that COVID-19 shots arent always as safe as you have been led to believe. Even someone in their 20s, in peak physical form, can be severely harmed, which is why Warner is also speaking out against vaccine mandates.

I believe where there is risk, there needs to be choice, he said.1But right now, people are being misled. People are being coerced into making a decision based on lack of information versus being convinced of a decision based on total information transparency.2

COVID Jab Triggers Reaction, Doctor Doesnt Believe Him

Warner wanted to be able to travel internationally, so he decided to get a COVID-19 shot. He received his first dose of the Pfizer jab in mid-May 2021, suffering only a sore arm afterward. After his second dose on June 10, his arm wasnt even sore, so he thought he got off easy.

But there was a strange symptom that occurred within seconds that may have been the clue that something was very wrong. As soon as they injected it, I had a weird metallic saline taste in my mouth. I asked the guy, Is that normal? and he said no, they dont hear of that much.3According to Campbell:4

The fact that the clinician doesnt recognize that a metallic taste in the mouth could be a sign of an inadvertent intravascular administration concerns me because what happens is if the vaccine goes into your muscle, then it stays in your muscle, and its going to take half an hour to be systemically absorbed at all, or much longer than that. But if it goes into a vessel, you get a metallic taste straight away

The fact that you could taste that straight away is, to me, very suspicious of them inadvertently giving that into a blood vessel Basically youre having the inflammatory reaction in your heart and in your joints instead of in your arm.

A day or two later, with no sore arm, he thought it was going to be easier than the first dose, but about two weeks later he started having strange reactions in his heart. Throughout the day, he started experiencing periods of accelerated heart rate. As a professional athlete, Warner is very in-tune with his body.

He regularly wears a smart watch that tracks his heart rate and knows whats normal for him and this was not. While sitting at rest, his heart rate would spike to the 90s and over 100. He decided to cut out all stimulants like caffeine, just in case, and took two weeks off from riding because he didnt feel good.

After the break, he attempted to go for a ride and his heart rate spiked to 160 and remained elevated. Feeling weak and nauseous, he had his friend take him to the emergency room. He told the ER doctor that hed heard about myocarditis as a side effect with the mRNA injections and he thought he was having this reaction. They completely brushed him off, telling him that he was not having that reaction but, instead, was having an anxiety attack.

After being told that his problem didnt make him a priority to be seen, he sat in the waiting room for 3.5 hours and was ultimately given a shot of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug Toradol to treat reactive arthritis. His heart rate dropped down to 110, leading the doctor to tell him he was doing better, but he was still at nearly double his average heart rate.

The doctors solution was to refer him to a psychiatrist for what he described as a psychotic episode. According to Warner, since he suggested that his reaction was from the shot, the health care practitioners thought he was imagining things or trying to be anti-vaxx or a conspiracy theorist. Four days later, he ended up in the hospital again.

Diagnosed With Pericarditis, POTS and Reactive Arthritis

Days after being sent home from the ER, Warner again had problems with his heart this time, a strong squeezing sensation along with cramping and burning. He went to a different hospital where they took his concern seriously, said it could be myocarditis an inflammation of the heart muscle and referred him to a cardiologist.

Its since been recognized that myocarditis and pericarditis, inflammation of the outer lining of the heart, are occurring after COVID-19 shots, most often after the second dose in male adolescents and young adults.5,6The cardiologist diagnosed Warner with pericarditis along with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and reactive arthritis.

POTS is a blood circulation disorder that affects the autonomic nervous system and can be triggered by injections, including mRNA COVID-19 shots.7One of the key symptoms of POTS is a significant increase in heart rate when a person stands up, and the elevated heart rate remains elevated for a longer than normal period. Fatigue, nausea, dizziness, heart palpitations and exercise intolerance can also occur.

As a professional biker, Warner has had his share of injuries, although prior to the shot he wasnt in any pain and all of his injuries had healed. After the second dose of the jab, however, he felt like all of his old injuries were reactivated and became painful again. His wrists, for instance, became so painful that he couldnt put his seatbelt on.

For four months now, Warner has been so ill that he hasnt been able to work. Even mental exertion can cause him to relapse physically. When he has a good day and overdoes it, he ends up in pain again for the next few days. Even reading too much makes him feel drained.

While his symptoms of pericarditis have cleared, hes still struggling with the symptoms of reactive arthritis and POTS, which can last for 12 to 18 months or more. And Warner, being very fit and accustomed to listening to his body, caught the problem early many others may not.

Wheres the Support for Vaccine-Injured People?

Upward of 60 people have reached out to Warner to share their own experiences getting injured by COVID-19 shots. Many of them have been afraid to tell others out of fear that theyll be mocked, ridiculed or labeled an antivaxxer for speaking out. However, they are not alone.

As of October 15, 2021, 818,044 adverse events have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System following COVID-19 shots, including 17,128 deaths.8Past investigations have shown only between 1%9and 10%10of adverse reactions are ever reported to VAERS, which is a passive, voluntary reporting system, so the actual number could be much higher and Steve Kirsch estimates there could be over 5 million unreported adverse effects.

Warner had to fill out his own report to VAERS because no doctor would do it for him. It took him 45 minutes to complete a length of time that many doctors cant or wont devote when it comes to reporting adverse vaccine reactions seen among their patients.

At the Real, Not Rare rally held in Washington, D.C., Warner spoke before politicians to make a difference in the support level for vaccine-injured people which is nonexistent in the U.S. and voice opposition to vaccine mandates.

Their mission is to gain acknowledgement from elected officials and federal health agencies of vaccine adverse reactions and raise awareness within the medical community about these reactions. They also want to stop the denial of certain vaccine exemptions and stop vaccine mandates:11

Real lives are being affected by not so rare consequences. Many vaccine injured individuals are seeking acknowledgment by the media and government so they can receive better healthcare and treatment. Vaccine injured individuals did their part by getting this vaccine, and now they need your help.

Warner has also spoken with React 19, a grassroots organization also raising awareness about adverse events from COVID-19 shots. The woman who started the group, Warner said, is one of the first COVID-19 shot clinical trial patients and one of the first COVID-19 vaccine-injured people in the U.S. The group is tracking the vaccine injuries of 5,000 people and is calling on others to share their reactions as well, as part of their patient-led research program.12

Sadly, Warner said six of the people suffering from adverse events committed suicide in the past month; with the current government narrative silencing and censoring those who speak out about COVID-19 shot risks, those injured have no opportunity to speak out about their experiences. Even now, Warner said, being unable to work and carry on with his daily life the way he did pre-shot, I just feel so worthless.13

Warner has experimented with a number of therapies that he believes have helped, including ivermectin, pine needle tea and star anise. His doctor has recommended staying hydrated, wearing compression leggings and exercising gently in a supine position to regain his strength, but he still cant ride a bike.

Vaccine-Injured Unlikely to Get Help

While health officials have begun to acknowledge myocarditis following COVID-19 shots, there are many other adverse events that are still being ignored. Neuroinflammation, severe headaches, epilepsy and even blindness have been reported, Warner said. While an increasing number of people are calling for support for those who have been injured, U.S. law is set up to protect drug companies with a complete liability shield.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already have something of a free pass when it comes to vaccine injury liability and lawsuits through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 198614and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in 2005.15The 1986 Act established a federal no-fault vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) as an administrative alternative to a lawsuit for injuries caused by vaccines recommended by the CDC for children.

Contested vaccine injury claims are adjudicated by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C., and there is a trust fund out of which claims are paid, sparing insurance companies representing vaccine makers and vaccine providers from costly payouts for vaccine injuries and deaths.16

Only reactions to routinely recommended vaccines may be heard in this vaccine court, however, which doesnt apply to COVID-19 shots, which are being routed through the obscure Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.17The bottom line, sadly, is this, as noted by NVICs Barbara Loe Fisher:

If you or a loved one dies or is permanently injured by an experimental or [recently] licensed COVID vaccine, you cannot sue the drug company who made it, even if there is evidence the company could have made it less reactive or more effective.

Sources and References

The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola

See the original post:

Elite Athlete Explains Vaccine Injury and Doctors Ignorance ...

If it seems like Im running all Stew-Peters-all-the-time, I was looking for the most recent video featuringDr Peter McCullough and found him on with Stew Peters in this interview that was published yesterday.

Dr Peter McCullough MD is a Professor at Texas A & M College of Medicine, President, Cardiorenal Society of America, Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology and others. He has written 46 peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19 and is considered among the worlds experts on the topic, testifying in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in November 2020, and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, in the Colorado General Assembly, and in the New Hampshire Senate, concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.

Dr McCullough also practices internal medicine in Dallas andhe was initially a proponent of the vaccine, until the many adverse reactions among his patients changed his mind completely. He has since come out adamantly against the jab.

He says, Like most physicians looking at the data coming out of the registrational trials, the products looked like they were effective, 90% vaccine efficacyThrough December, January, February, probably 70% of my patients here at Baylor in Dallas received the COVID-19 vaccinelooking backwards, now, on January 22nd, we had actually already had 186 deaths that had occurred after the vaccine. The threshold of concern is about 150 or so. In general, we get about 150 [deaths] for all the vaccines combined. 500 million shots per year, across 70 vaccines but for a single vaccine

I think if we had had a data and safety monitoring board, they would have shut down the vaccine in February of 2021.

Stew responds, 25 people died during the Swine Flu vaccine. They shut it down immediatelyNow, youre talking about 180-some odd deaths at one location.The CDC is now acknowledging over 12,000 deaths. For perspective, thats 3 [sic] times the amount of people that perished in 9/11some of the most deadly days in our worlds history, specifically, here in the United States are minuscule in comparison to these deaths, I just dont understand. So how did you come to the conclusion that these deaths or the condition of these inoculated patients was actually related to the injections?

Dr McCullough says, Initially, we didnt know. As these deaths continued to mount, on two occasions, in March and then later on, in June, the CDC put on their website that CDC and FDA reviewers had looked at the deaths and none of them were related to the vaccine and so doctors in my circles were questioning this, because patients were immediately dying after the vaccine at the vaccine centers or then shortly thereafter, wed be called about some kind of fatal event thats happened, whether its at home or patients come to the hospital with some type of fatal event.

And so two important analyses came forward, one from McLaughlin in London and one by Rose, using the VAERS data and they basically concluded this: that 50% of the deaths occur between 48 hours of the injection and 80% of the deaths occur within a week.

86% of the deaths have no other explanation. Theyre well enough to walk into an ambulatory and actually have the COVID-19 vaccine and within two days, theyve died. So, its my judgement and Ive done a lot of work on data and safety monitoring boards and clinical review boards its my judgement, at this point in time that the vaccine is the cause of death in the majority of cases

The proposition, now of coming in or of even being pressured or forced or coerced into a vaccine, which, for some people, it looks like it will be fatal is an agonizing situation. Ive never seen it in my career.

Dr McCullough says that in a report published by the American Journal of Science and Law, it looks like the non-fatal events that occur go along 4 organ systems: the brain, the heart, the immune system and the hematologic system.

My analysis of this, for instance, the cardiac myocarditis theres now an official FDA warning on this that appears to relatively immediate, in the data that the CDC and the NIH reviewed and the FDA reviewed it was in about two days of the second shotIve seen these cases in my clinic and theyre frightening.

The CDC has now certified 2,000 of these cases. They tended to hit younger individualsIm becoming very worried that the messenger RNA or the adenoviral DNA is taken up and its not disposed-of and that the spike protein is continuing to be produced locally in the tissues and causing damage.

Senator [Ron] Johnson held the first vaccine injurypress briefing and I was amazed at what the late-onset and the emergence of the neurologic symptoms that you mentioned. And it really depends and we know the lipid nanoparticles are taken up into the brain, the messenger RNA and the adenoviral DNA is taken up into the brain and it probably depends on how much and where the seeding occurs

I have a patient in my practice who has a very prominentcerebellar syndromeshe has imbalance and also has tremendous memory loss, tremor. She is absolutely not right, Stew. Ive had her ten years in my practice and she was perfectly normal. She took a vaccine and within about a month, now its progressing to the next level, she has this horrific neurologic syndrome.

The two get into the baffling symptoms presented by some, particularly the young, who are gasping for breath but whose tests appear normal and what the explanation might be.

Dr McCullough says, Doctors in my circles, the interpretation of this is that the messenger RNA or the adenoviral DNA is taken up in the cells, the spike protein is produced in the cells, its expressed on the cell surface and then body is attacking its own cells. The spike protein that circulates in the blood, after a few weeks, thats actually mopped-up by the circulating antibodies, which are supposed to be there.

Ogata and colleagues from Harvard published a paper showing the first injection of messenger RNA, theyre circulating spike proteins. After the second injection, the antibodies raise up in the bloodstream and damp down the spike protein but the local production of spike protein is what were concerned about, causing these neuro-, cardiac and hematologic syndromes.

So we have some laboratories hints.Dr Charles Hoffein Canada has presented on this. The D-dimer test, which is a sensitive test of blood-clotting, which is elevated in SARS-CoV-2 infection, appears to be elevated in those patients with these vaccine injuries. Hes reporting 50% to 60% rates of elevation of D-dimer.

We know that the imaging, right now is not helping us. Getting MRI imaging or other imaging, you cant see the spike protein, itself causing damage and yet, we cant measure the spike protein in blood. Theres still no clinical test to do that but importantly, we do imaging. Its important, because we have to rule out blood clots and we know the FDA has warnings on J&J, for instance on blood clots in the brain. There are analyses showing that blood clots are, to a greater extent, with Pfizer and Moderna.

They can occur throughout the body, so every patient who presents with a neurologic syndrome must have imaging, either CT or MRI imaging, mainly to rule out blood clot as an etiology of the neurologic syndrome.

Stew then asks him if there is a way to reverse any of this. Dr McCullough replies, We dont think so.I think what happens, Stew is that so many Americans patriotically went out, hey volunteered to be in the vaccine program in December, January and February. We had a huge rush a people who did this. They were told that it was safe and effective. Nobody really asked what was in these vaccines and then, we started to see this evolve over time, so I think its fine for people to change their view on the vaccine and they should, based on emerging data. The CDC keeps telling us, Go to VAERS.com and look for yourself, do your research. Thats what we see throughout all the CDC webpages.

What we havent had, that is really an act of malfeasance is we have not had a press briefing by the sponsors of the program, which is the CDC and the FDA to tell Americans whats going on with safetyThey should be having at least weekly or monthly press briefings on this. They should have a critical event committee, a data and safety monitoring board, a human ethics committee. There was a paper by Bruno and colleagues worldwide paper, 57 authors, 17 countries they basically told everybody in the world, Get the safety mechanisms in place on the vaccine program or shut it down.

We cant continue to do this and blindside Americans and people all over the world on safety. We cant ask them to take a vaccine without giving fair disclosure, fair balance on safety information.

Stew asks him if hes ever in his career seen a blank insert, such as is seen in the packaging of the vaccine vials. Dr McCullough says he hasnt and that the mechanism of that is the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA); theyre not fully approved, so there is no vetted packages insert on safety information.

Its called ISI or Important Safety Information and what the viewer should know is that when something gets fully approved, it must be fully presented with fair balance. And what we see by our government agencies is that theyre taking advantage of the loosely-written EUA legislation, which doesnt indicate that fair balance needs to be presented and so theyre not presenting it.

But Ive chaired over two dozen data and safety monitoring boards, with committee work we always work in teams I have been a part of major programs where weve had to shut it down because of safety. Ive done this before. Ive done this type of work, Ive chaired the data and safety monitoring boards for the National Institutes of Health in fact, Im doing so, right now. So I can tell you, as a doctor and this is my book of business. Im in my fourth decade of doing this, I can tell you, this program should have been shut down in February, based on safetyStew, its going to go down as the most dangerous biologic medicinal product roll-out in human history

The mechanism of action is clearly poisonous and then we know that the generation of the spike protein, itself, it damages local tissues, its not natural for a human cell to produce this foreign spike protein. Weve never asked the human body to produce a foreign protein, ever. This is so radically new to do this and to do it on a mass scale and to, let alone express on the cell surface and have the body start to attack its own cells and then, let it circulate in the bloodstream, where we know it damages blood cells and causes blood clotting.

So the mechanism of action in the human body is so alarmingly dangerous, if you were to draw this up on a chalkboard, two years ago and say, You know, were gonna do this, were gonna give it a whirl, I dont think we could even get a human volunteer to sign up for this. I dont think I wold ever bring it forward as a product idea, even on the drawing board.

Stew asks him if he wold ever recommend the vaccine for a child and he responds, Under no circumstancesat this point in time, I really cant recommend it to anybodyI think, at this point in time, its fair to warn against itId say, take the risks with a natural infection right now and lets treat early.We have EUA on monoclonal antibodies. They have just as good of an approval as the vaccines. We should give monoclonal antibody infusionsThe vaccine, once its in the body, we cant get it out and we dont know how to manage these complications, some of which are fatal.

When asked about the shedding phenomenon, Dr McCullough does think its real but he doesnt think it persists much beyond 4 weeks, as the antibodies mop them up, which is the purpose of the vaccine.

Reprinted with the authors permission.

View original post here:

DR PETER Mccullough Urgent Warning About Poisonous Jabs - LewRockwell

We are constantly told that vaccines are safe and effective and that theres nothing to worry about. This simply isnt the case, and its a hard-to-swallow truth that many people refuse to acknowledge. Mass marketing campaignsportray vaccines in a God-like light, and the science is being ignored. The truth is that vaccines are actually exempt from double blind placebo controlled studies and they have not been put through appropriate safety testing. Furthermore, a number of concerns have been raised about vaccine safety by a number of scientists arounds the world. I like to use aluminum as an example. Astudy published in 2011makes the issue quite clear, stating, Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical sciences understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. Fast forward nearly a decade later and scientists have now shown that injected aluminum does not exit the body, it actually sticks around and gets carried by specific cells into distant organs and into the brain where it can be detected after injection (source)(source). Multiple studies have emphasized these findings, and the studies do nothing but trigger silence from big pharma as well as our federal health regulatory agencies.

Federal health regulatory agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have a long history of traceable corruption and not responding to inquiries made by scientists. One example comesfrom a pilot studyby the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR)to test the efficiency of a state-of-the-art machine counting (AI) system on data records from the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institution.

The main doctors involved with the study were Michael Klompas, M.D. andLazarus, Ross, MBBS, MPH, MMed, GDCompSci.

Klompas is a Professor of Population Medicine at Harvard Medical School, and Lazarus was a Harvard Medical School professor for 11 years, and was a professor there during this pilot study. Dissolving Illusions: ... Bystrianyk, Roman Best Price: $38.50 Buy New $21.60 (as of 11:00 UTC - Details)

Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.

This completely contradicts the CDCs claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.

The doctors also bring up something very important, and thats the fact that investigators from the CDCs Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) participated on a panel to explore the perspective of clinicians, electronic health record (EHR) vendors, the pharmaceutical industry, and the FDA towards systems that use proactive, automated adverse event reporting.

The doctors emphasize how fewer than 1% percent of vaccine adverse events are even reported. So, theoretically, that 1/39 number discovered from the data mentioned above is actually a lot greater given the fact that many adverse events arent even reported.

As the authors state:

Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of problem drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed. Barriers to reporting include a lack of clinician awareness, uncertainty about when and what to report, as well as the burdens of reporting: reporting is not part of clinicians usual workflow, takes time, and is duplicative. Proactive, spontaneous, automated adverse event reporting imbedded within EHRs and other information systems has the potential to speed the identification of problems with new drugs and more careful quantification of the risks of older drugs. (source)

Whats really telling is that the doctors state that there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessmentsdue to the factthat the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving datawere no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.

That last part is quite concerning, isnt it?

It reminds me of the Spider Papers.

A group called the CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or CDC SPIDER, put a list of complaints in a letter to the CDC Chief of Staff and provideda copy of the letterto the public watchdog organizationU.S. Right to Know (USRTK).

Weareagroupofscientistsat CDC that are veryconcerned about the current state of ethicsat ouragency.Itappearsthat ourmission isbeing influenced and shaped byoutside partiesand rogueinterests.Itseemsthat ourmission and Congressional intent for our agencyisbeing circumventedbysomeof ourleaders. What concernsusmost, isthat it isbecoming the norm andnottherareexception. Some seniormanagement officialsat CDC are clearlyaware and evencondonethesebehavior.

There is also a revolving door between CDC employees and Big Pharma employees.A great example with regards to vaccines would be Julie Gerberding. A fairly recent post by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. via hisInstagram accountexplains:

Julie Gerberding. As CDC Director from 2002-2009 Gerberding: -Granted Merck a lucrative monopoly for its blockbuster MMR vaccine based on efficacy data falsified by Merck and never verified by CDC. (Merck ordered its scientists to add rabbit antibodies to human blood samples to fool regulators.) That vaccine is now causing epidemics of dangerous mumps outbreaks in older populations. -Oversaw publication of key CDC study, Desteffano 2004, designed to conceal links between Mercks MMR vaccine and the autism epidemic. -Punished, threatened, and silenced CDC whistleblower Dr William Thompson when he tried to report that CDC officials destroyed data linking autism epidemic to Mercks MMR vaccine. -Approved and mandated Mercks dangerous and ineffective $3.2 billion Gardisil vaccine based on clearly falsified safety and efficacy data.

In 2010 Merck rewarded Gerberding for her lucrative fealty to Merck during her 7 years as CDC Director with an appointment to run Mercks vaccines division at a $2.5 million annual salary and $5 million in stock options.

We Know About Vaccine Injuries, But Are Vaccines Even Effective/Necessary ForThose Who Dont Get Injured?

I like to use the MMR vaccine as an example for vaccine injuries.

According to aMedAlertssearch of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, which is the subject of the pilot study mentioned above, as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid out approximately $4 billion to compensate families of vaccine injured children. As astronomical as the monetary awards are, theyre even more alarming considering HHS claims that only anestimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reportedto theVaccine Adverse Events Reporting, System(VAERS). Again, these facts are also illustrated by the study thats the main focus of this article. If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported and the families of the vast majority of people injured by vaccines are picking up the costs, once again, for vaccine makers flawed products.

From 2013 to 2017, measles killed 2 people, butthe vaccine killed 127 people. The odds of dying from the measlesare 0.01 0.02 percent, meaning you have a greater chance of getting hit by a lightning bolt multiple times. Furthermore, if your child contracts the measles, they will be immune for life, but that cannot be said for vaccinated children.

So theres that, and then there is the fact that measles outbreaks have occurred in highly vaccinated populations. A study published as far back as 1994 in JAMA Internal Medicine makes this quite clear.

Measles is the most transmissible disease known to man. During the 1980s, the number of measles cases in the United States rose dramatically. Surprisingly, 20% to 40% of these cases occurred in persons who had been appropriately immunized against measles. In response, the United States adopted a twodose universal measles immunization program. We critically examine the effect of vaccine failure in measles occurring in immunized persons.

We found 18 reports of measles outbreaks in very highly immunized school populations where 71% to 99.8% of students were immunized against measles. Despite these high rates of immunization, 30% to 100% (mean, 77%) of all measles cases in these outbreaks occurred in previously immunized students. In our hypothetical school model, after more than 95% of schoolchildren are immunized against measles, the majority of measles cases occur in appropriately immunized children.(source)

The only sad thing about the study above is that they recommended more vaccines to try and make up for vaccine failure.

During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences. The media (Pharma-owned) generated high public anxiety. This fear mongering led to the demonization of unvaccinated children, who were perceived as the spreaders of this disease. Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of the published report, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases who had the data proving that the measles outbreak was in part caused by the vaccine. It is evidence of the vaccines failure to provide immunity. (source) Jabbed: How the Vaccin... Wilcox, Brett Best Price: $18.85 Buy New $19.03 (as of 12:00 UTC - Details)

According to an article published in theAmerican Journal of Public Healthin 1991, In early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. (source)

A studypublished in the highly authoritativeBulletin of the World Health Organizationlooked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012, with a steep upward trend in 2013. The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 26,443 was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012. This is odd considering thatsince 2009 the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target population. (source)

A study published in the journalClinical Infectious Diseases whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak, which showed that individualswith prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).(source)

The list of examples is long, and it suggests that we are seeing a failing vaccine instead of a failure to vaccinate, yet these are facts that mainstream media never addresses.

It makes you wonder, how effective are vaccines, and are they even producing immunity like they are marketed to do?

Ill leave you with the video below of Mary Holland educating the Washington committee on HB1638, a mandatory vaccination bill similar to the recent bill on mandatory vaccination passed in California,SB276.

The Takeaway

Its quite clear that mandatory vaccinations arent justifiable. The information presented in this article is constantly ignored and never addressed by the opposition. Instead, mainstream media uses terms like anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and ridicule to further drive home their corporate agenda. Why are points made in this article never addressed and countered or even acknowledged?

Reprinted with permission from Collective Evolution.

Follow this link:

Harvard Medical School Professors Uncover a Hard To Swallow Truth About ...

Lets start with a thought experiment: If an engineering design flaw exists and no one measures it, can it really injure people or kill them? a Twitter user named Ehden writes.1He goes on to discuss an overlooked aspect of the COVID mRNA shots, something called codon optimization, which virtually guarantees unexpected results. Ehden explains:2

Trying to tell your body to generate proteins is hard for many reasons. One of them is the fact that when you try to run the protein information via ribosomes which process that code and generate the protein, it can be very slow or can get stuck during the process.

Luckily, scientists found a way to overcome this problem, by doing code substitution: instead of using the original genetic code to generate the protein, they changed the letters in the code so the code would be optimized. This is known as Codon Optimization.

COVID Shots Use Codon Optimization

A codon consists of three nucleotides, and nucleotides are the building blocks of DNA. An August 2021 article in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, addressed the use of codon optimization as follows:3

The open reading frame of the mRNA vaccine is the most crucial component because it contains the coding sequence that is translated into protein.

Although the open reading frame is not as malleable as the non-coding regions, it can be optimized to increase translation without altering the protein sequence by replacing rarely used codons with more frequently occurring codons that encode the same amino acid residue.

For instance, the biopharmaceutical company CureVac AG discovered that human mRNA codons rarely have A or U at the third position and patented a strategy that replaces A or U at the third position in the open reading frame with G or C. CureVac used this optimization strategy for its SARS-CoV-2 candidate CVnCoV

Although replacement of rare codons is an attractive optimization strategy, it must be used judiciously. This is because, in the case of some proteins, the slower translation rate of rare codons is necessary for proper protein folding.

To maximize translation, the mRNA sequence typically incorporates modified nucleosides, such as pseudouridine, N1-methylpseudouridine or other nucleoside analogues. Because all native mRNAs include modified nucleosides, the immune system has evolved to recognize unmodified single-stranded RNA, which is a hallmark of viral infection.

Specifically, unmodified mRNA is recognized by pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), TLR7 and TLR8, and the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIGI) receptor. TLR7 and TLR8 receptors bind to guanosine- or uridine-rich regions in mRNA and trigger the production of type I interferons, such as IFN, that can block mRNA translation.

The use of modified nucleosides, particularly modified uridine, prevents recognition by pattern recognition receptors, enabling sufficient levels of translation to produce prophylactic amounts of protein.

Both the Moderna and PfizerBioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccines contain nucleoside-modified mRNAs. Another strategy to avoid detection by pattern recognition receptors, pioneered by CureVac, uses sequence engineering and codon optimization to deplete uridines by boosting the GC content of the vaccine mRNA.

Much of this information was previously reviewed in my interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. You cant see the article but the video is embedded above. This study was published well after our interview and merely confirms what Seneff and Mikovits have unraveled in their research.

According to Ehden, 60.9% of the codons in COVID shots have been optimized, equivalent to 22.5% of the nucleotides, but he doesnt specify which shot hes talking about, or exactly where the data came from.

That all mRNA COVID shots are using codon optimization to one degree or another is clear, however. A July 2021 article4in the journal Vaccines specifically evaluates and comments on the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA shots, noting:

The design of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines involves many different types of optimizations The mRNA components of the vaccine need to have a 5-UTR to load ribosomes efficiently onto the mRNA for translation initiation, optimized codon usage for efficient translation elongation, and optimal stop codon for efficient translation termination.

Both 5-UTR and the downstream 3-UTR should be optimized for mRNA stability. The replacement of uridine by N1-methylpseudourinine () complicates some of these optimization processes because is more versatile in wobbling than U. Different optimizations can conflict with each other, and compromises would need to be made.

I highlight the similarities and differences between Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines and discuss the advantage and disadvantage of each to facilitate future vaccine improvement. In particular, I point out a few optimizations in the design of the two mRNA vaccines that have not been performed properly.

What Can Go Wrong?

One key take-home from the Nature Reviews Drug Discovery article5cited above is that replacing rare codons must be used judiciously, as rarer codons can have slower translation rates and a slowed-down rate is actually necessary to prevent protein misfolding.

A (adenine) and U (uracil) in the third position are rare, and the COVID shots replace these As and Us with Gs (guanine) or Cs (cytosine). According to Seneff, this switch results in a 1,000-fold greater amount of spike protein compared to being infected with the actual virus.

What could go wrong? Well, just about anything. Again, the shot induces spike protein at levels unheard of in nature (even if SARS-CoV-2 is a souped up manmade concoction), and the spike protein is the toxic part of the virus responsible for the most unique effects of the virus, such as the blood clotting disorders, neurological problems and heart damage.

So, to expect the COVID shot to not produce these kinds of effects would be rather nave. The codon switches might also result in protein misfolding, which is equally bad news. As explained by Seneff in our previous interview:

The spike proteins that these mRNA vaccines are producing arent able to go into the membrane, which I think is going to encourage it to become a problematic prion protein. Then, when you have inflammation, it upregulates alpha-synuclein [a neuronal protein that regulates synaptic traffic and neurotransmitter release].

So, youre going to get alpha-synuclein drawn into misfolded spike proteins, turning into a mess inside the dendritic cells in the germinal centers in the spleen. And theyre going to package up all this crud into exosomes and release them. Theyre then going to travel along the vagus nerve to the brainstem and cause things like Parkinsons disease.

So, I think this is a complete setup for Parkinsons disease Its going to push forward the date at which someone who has a propensity towards Parkinsons is going to get it.

And its probably going to cause people to get Parkinsons who never would have gotten it in the first place especially if they keep getting the vaccine every year. Every year you do a booster, you bring the date that youre going to get Parkinsons ever closer.

Immune Dysfunction and Viral Flare-Ups

Other significant threats include immune dysfunction and the flare-up of latent viral infections, which is something Mikovits has been warning about. In our previous interview, she noted:

We use poly(I:C) [a toll-like receptor 3 agonist] to signal the cell to turn on the type I interferon pathway, and because [the spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID shot] is an unnatural synthetic envelope, youre not seeing poly(I:C), and youre not [activating] the Type I interferon pathway.

Youve bypassed the plasmacytoid dendritic cell, which combined with IL-10, by talking to the regulatory B cells, decides what subclasses of antibodies to put out. So, youve bypassed the communication between the innate and adaptive immune response. You now miss the signaling of the endocannabinoid receptors

A large part of Dr. [Francis] Ruscettis and my work over the last 30 years has been to show you dont need an infectious transmissible virus just pieces and parts of these viruses are worse, because they also turn on danger signals. They act like danger signals and pathogen-associated molecular patterns.

So, it synergistically leaves that inflammatory cytokine signature on that spins your innate immune response out of control. It just cannot keep up with the myelopoiesis [the production of cells in your bone marrow]. Hence you see a skew-away from the mesenchymal stem cell towards TGF-beta regulated hematopoietic stem cells.

This means you could see bleeding disorders on both ends. You cant make enough firetrucks to send to the fire. Your innate immune response cant get there, and then youve just got a total train wreck of your immune system.

Were now seeing reports of herpes and shingles infection following COVID-19 injection, and this is precisely what you can expect if your Type I interferon pathway is disabled. Thats not the end of your potential troubles, however, as these coinfections could accelerate other diseases as well.

For example, herpes viruses have been implicated as a trigger of both AIDS6and myalgic encephalomyelitis7(chronic fatigue syndrome or ME-CFS). According to Mikovits, these diseases dont appear until viruses from different families partner up and retroviruses take out the Type 1 interferon pathway. Long term, the COVID mass injection campaign may be laying the foundation for a rapidly approaching avalanche of a wide range of debilitating chronic illnesses.

Are COVID Shots Appropriately Optimized?

As noted in the Vaccines article cited earlier, the codon optimization in the Pfizer and Moderna shots could be problematic:8

As mammalian host cells attack unmodified exogeneous RNA, all U nucleotides were replaced by N1-methylpseudouridine (). However, wobbles more in base-pairing than U and can pair not only with A and G, but also, to a lesser extent, with C and U.

This is likely to increase misreading of a codon by a near-cognate tRNA. When nucleotide U in stop codons was replaced by , the rate of misreading of a stop codon by a near-cognate tRNAs increased.

Such readthrough events would not only decrease the number of immunogenic proteins, but also produce a longer protein of unknown fate with potentially deleterious effects

The designers of both vaccines considered CGG as the optimal codon in the CGN codon family and recoded almost all CGN codons to CGG [M]ultiple lines of evidence suggest that CGC is a better codon than CGG. The designers of the mRNA vaccines (especially mRNA-1273) chose a wrong codon as the optimal codon.

The paper also points out the importance of vaccine mRNA to be translated accurately and not merely effectively, because if the wrong amino acids are incorporated, it can confuse your immune system and prevent it from identifying the correct targets.

Accuracy is also important in translation termination, and here it comes down to selecting the correct stop codons. Stop codons (UAA, UAG or UGA), when present at the end of an mRNA coding sequence signals the termination of protein synthesis.

According to the author, both Pfizer and Moderna selected less than optimal stop codons. UGA is a poor choice of a stop codon, and UGAU in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines could be even worse, she says.

What Health Problems Can We Expect to See More Of?

While the variety of diseases we may see a rise in as a result of this vaccination campaign are myriad, some general predictions can be made. Weve already seen a massive uptick in blood clotting disorders, heart attacks and stroke, as well as heart inflammation.

More long term, Seneff believes well see a significant rise in cancer, accelerated Parkinsons-like diseases, Huntingtons disease, and all types of autoimmune diseases and neurodegenerative disorders.

Mikovits also suspects many will develop chronic and debilitating diseases and will die prematurely. At highest risk, she places those who are asymptomatically infected with XMRVs and gammaretroviruses from contaminated conventional vaccines. The COVID shot will effectively accelerate their death by crippling their immune function. The kids that are highly vaccinated, theyre ticking time bombs, Mikovits said in my May 2021 interview.

What Are the Options?

While all of this is highly problematic, there is hope. From my perspective, I believe the best thing you can do is to build your innate immune system. To do that, you need to become metabolically flexible and optimize your diet. Youll also want to make sure your vitamin D level is optimized to between 60 ng/mL and 80 ng/mL (100 nmol/L to 150 nmol/L).

I also recommend time-restricted eating, where you eat all your meals for the day within a six- to eight-hour window. Time-restricted eating will also upregulate autophagy, which may help digest and remove spike protein. Avoid all vegetable oils and processed foods. Focus on certified-organic foods to minimize your glyphosate exposure.

Sauna therapy may also be helpful. It upregulates heat shock proteins, which can help refold misfolded proteins. They also tag damaged proteins and target them for removal.

Sources and References

The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola

Read more from the original source:

The Long-Term Dangers of Experimental mRNA Shots - LewRockwell

The video above features Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, internist and epidemiologist, and editor of two peer-review journals, who has been on the media and medical frontlines fighting for early COVID treatment. McCullough has also been outspoken about the potential dangers of the COVID shots, and the lack of necessity for them. Curiously, agencies that are currently calling the shots do not have the authority to dictate how medicine is practiced.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for example, has no power to tell doctors what to do or how to treat patients. The National Institutes of Health are a government research organization and cannot tell doctors how to treat patients.

Ditto for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is an epidemiologic analysis organization. It is the job of practicing doctors to identify appropriate and effective treatment protocols, which is precisely what McCullough has been doing since the start of this pandemic.

In August 2020, McCulloughs landmark paper Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection was published online in the American Journal of Medicine.1

A follow-up paper, Multifaceted Highly Targeted Sequential Multidrug Treatment of Early Ambulatory High-Risk SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) was published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine in December 2020.2It became the basis for a home treatment guide.

COVID Shots Are Dangerous and Ineffective

When it comes to the COVID injections, McCullough cites research showing those at highest risk of dying from COVID-19 are also at highest risk of dying from the COVID shot. Additionally, the shots are causing severe heart damage in younger people whose risk of dying from COVID is inconsequential.

He points out the safety signal is very clear, with 19,249 deaths having been reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System as of November 19, 2021.3

The signal is also consistent both internally and externally. A number of side effects are reported in high numbers, and very close to the time of injection, that validate the suspicion that the shots are at fault. The U.S. data are also consistent with data from other countries, such as the Yellow Card system in the U.K.

Despite that, not a single safety review has been conducted to weed out risk factors and the like. Were almost a year into the program and theres been no attempt at risk mitigation, McCullough says. At the same time, there have been gross attempts to coerce Americans into taking the shots everything from free beer or a free lap dance, to million-dollar lotteries and paid scholarships to state universities.

Such enticements are an undeniable violation of research ethics that strictly forbid any and all kinds of coercion of human subjects. As suspected and predicted, no sooner had bribery stopped working than government officials started talking about vaccine mandates.

President Biden infamously stated that his patience with vaccine hesitancy was wearing thin. The insinuation was that if people didnt get the shot, theyd face serious repercussions, and were now seeing those repercussions play out day by day, as people are being fired and kicked out of school for refusing the jab.

Meanwhile, they havent even determined which vaccine is the most effective, which is remarkable. If government really wanted to end the pandemic with a vaccine, wouldnt they determine which shot works the best and promote the use of that? But no, they tell us any shot will do.

The fact that theres no safety report, theyre not telling you if youre taking the best vaccine, the fact that its kind of in a distorted way linked to your ability to work and go to school, that were violating the Nuremberg Code, violating the declaration of Helsinki its just not adding up. Its not looking good for those who are promoting the vaccine,McCullough says.

Add to all that the now-clear finding that the shots offer only limited protection for a very short time six months at best. According to McCullough, there are more than 20 studies showing efficacy drops to nothing at the six-month mark. Theyve also had very limited effectiveness against the Delta variant, which has been the predominant strain for several months.

Why Booster Treadmill Is Such a Health Hazard

Ive often stated that, in all likelihood, your risk of side effects will rise with each additional shot. McCullough cites research showing your body will produce the toxic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for 15 months.

If your body is still producing the spike protein which is whats causing the blood clots and cardiovascular damage and you take an additional shot every six months, there will come a time when your body simply cannot withstand the damage being caused by all the spike protein being produced.

Also consider this: While you only get at most six months worth of protection from any given shot, each injection will cause damage for 15 months. If we continue with boosters, eventually, its going to be impossible to ever clear out the spike protein.

While the spike protein is the part of the virus chosen as the antigen, the part that triggers an immune response, its also the part of the virus that causes the worst disease. The spike protein is responsible for COVID-19-related heart and vascular problems, and it has the same effect when produced by your own cells.

It causes blood clots, myocarditis and pericarditis, strokes, heart attacks and neurological damage, just to name a few. As noted by McCullough, the spike protein of this virus was genetically engineered to be more dangerous to humans than any previous coronavirus, and that is what the COVID shots are programming your cells to produce. Theyre just grossly unsafe for human use, McCullough says.

Myocarditis Will Likely Be Widespread

He goes on to discuss research from 2017,4which showed myocarditis in children and youth occurs at a rate of four cases per million per year. Assuming there are 60 million American children, the background rate for myocarditis would be 240 cases a year. How many cases of myocarditis have been reported to VAERS following COVID injection so far? 14,428 as of November 19, 2021.5

Doctors have never seen so many cases of myocarditis, McCullough says, citing research showing that among children between the ages of 12 and 17, 87% are hospitalized after receiving the shot. Thats how dangerous it is, he says. It is frequent, and it is severe.

Yet the FDA claims myocarditis after the COVID shot is rare and mild. Were now also getting reports of fatal cases of myocarditis in adults in their 30s and 40s. Myocarditis right now looks like an unqualified disaster, McCullough says, both for younger people and adults.

Sadly, children also reap no benefit from the shots, so its all risk and no benefit for them. McCullough points out there has been no recorded school outbreaks and no child-to-teacher transmission. He estimates 80% of school aged children are already immune, which would explain this.

Meanwhile, research cited in the interview found that children aged 12 to 17 are five times more likely to be hospitalized with COVID jab-induced myocarditis than they are to be hospitalized for COVID infection. These data counter the claim that COVID-induced heart problems are a far greater problem than vaccine-induced heart damage.

And lets not forget, if you take a COVID shot, you have a 100% chance of being exposed to whatever risk is associated with that shot. On the other hand, if you decline the injection, its not 100% chance youll get COVID-19, let alone die from it. You have a less than 1% chance of being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and getting sick.

So, its 100% deterministic that taking the shot exposes you to the risks of the shot, and less than 1% deterministic that youll get COVID if you dont take the shot.

COVID-19 Unrelated to Vaccination Rates

As noted by McCullough, rates of COVID are higher now in the highest vaccinated areas than they were before the vaccine rollout. That too tells us they arent working and not worth the risk.

He cites research6published September 30, 2021, in the European Journal of Epidemiology, which found no relationship between COVID-19 cases and levels of vaccination in 68 countries worldwide and 2,947 counties in the U.S. If anything, areas with high vaccination rates had slightly higher incidences of COVID-19. According to the authors:7

[T]he trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.

Iceland and Portugal, for example, where more than 75% of their populations are fully vaccinated, had more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than Vietnam and South Africa, where only about 10% of the populations are fully vaccinated.8Data from U.S. counties showed the same thing. New COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people were largely similar, regardless of the percentage of a states population that was fully vaccinated.

There appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated, the authors wrote.9Notably, out of the five U.S. counties with the highest vaccination rates ranging from 84.3% to 99.9% fully vaccinated four of them were on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Preventions high transmission list. Meanwhile, 26.3% of the 57 counties with low transmission have vaccination rates below 20%.

The study even accounted for a one-month lag time that could occur among the fully vaccinated, since its said that it takes two weeks after the final dose for full immunity to occur. Still, no discernable association between COVID-19 cases and levels of fully vaccinated was observed.10

Hospitalization rates for severe COVID infection have also risen, from 0.01% in January 2021 to 9% in May 2021, and the COVID death rate rose from zero percent to 15.1% in that same timeframe.11In short, everything is getting worse, not better, the more people get these shots.

Allowing natural immunity to build is really the only rational way forward. But then again, the COVID jabs arent about protecting public health. Theyre about ushering in a socio-economic control system via vaccine passports, which is something McCullough doesnt discuss in this interview. Nothing makes sense if you look at it from a medical standpoint. It only makes sense if you see it for what it is, which is a control system.

Natural Immunity Is Infinitely Better Than Vaccine Immunity

According to McCullough, natural immunity is infinitely better than vaccine immunity, and studies have borne that out time and again. The reason natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity is because viruses contain five different proteins.

The COVID shot induces antibodies against just one of those proteins, the spike protein, and no T cell immunity. When youre infected with the whole virus, you develop antibodies against all parts of the virus, plus memory T cells.

This also means natural immunity offers better protection against variants, as it recognizes several parts of the virus. If there are significant alternations to the spike protein, as with the Delta variant, vaccine-induced immunity can be evaded. Not so with natural immunity, as the other proteins are still recognized and attacked.

Heres a sampling of scholarly publications that have investigated natural immunity as it pertains to SARS-CoV-2 infection. There are several more in addition to these:12

Reinfection Is Very Rare

McCullough stresses there is also no need to worry about reinfection if youve already had COVID once. The fact is, while breakthrough cases continue among those who have gotten one or more COVID-19 injections, its extremely rare to get COVID-19 after youve recovered from the infection.

How rare? Researchers from Ireland conducted a systematic review including 615,777 people who had recovered from COVID-19, with a maximum duration of follow-up of more than 10 months.24

Reinfection was an uncommon event, they noted, with no study reporting an increase in the risk of reinfection over time. The absolute reinfection rate ranged from 0% to 1.1%, while the median reinfection rate was just 0.27%.25,26,27

Another study revealed similarly reassuring results. It followed 43,044 SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive people for up to 35 weeks, and only 0.7% were reinfected. When genome sequencing was applied to estimate population-level risk of reinfection, the risk was estimated at 0.1%.28

There was no indication of waning immunity over seven months of follow-up, unlike with the COVID-19 injection, which led the researchers to conclude that Reinfection is rare. Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy >90% for at least seven months.29

Its a one-and-done, McCullough says. If youve had it once, you wont get it again. He also advises against using PCR testing after youve had confirmed COVID-19 once, as any subsequent positive tests are just going to be false positives.

Early Treatment Options

In closing, should you get COVID-19, know there are several very effective early treatment options, and early treatment is key, both for preventing severe infection and preventing long-haul COVID. Here are a few suggestions:

Oral-nasal decontamination The virus, especially the Delta variant, replicates rapidly in the nasal cavity and mouth for three to five days before spreading to the rest of the body, so you want to strike where its most likely to be found right from the start.

Research30has demonstrated that irrigating your nasal passages with 2.5 milliliters of 10% povidone-iodine (an antimicrobial) and standard saline, twice a day, is an effective remedy.

Another option that was slightly less effective was using a mixture of saline with half a teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate (an alkalizer). You can also gargle with these to kill viruses in your mouth and throat. When done routinely, it can be a very effective preventive strategy. You can find printabletreatment guides on TruthForHealth.org.

Nebulized peroxide A similar strategy is to use nebulized hydrogen peroxide, diluted with saline to a 0.1% solution. Both hydrogen peroxide and saline31,32have antiviral effects.

In a May 10, 2021, Orthomolecular Medicine press release,33Dr. Thomas E. Levy board-certified in internal medicine and cardiology discussed the use of this treatment for COVID-19 specifically. Levy has in fact written an entire book on peroxide nebulization calledRapid Virus Recovery, which you can download for free from MedFox Publishing.

Vitamin D optimization Research has shown having a vitamin D level above 50 ng/mL brings the risk of COVID mortality down to near-zero.34

Other key nutraceuticals Vitamin C, zinc, quercetin and NAC all have scientific backing.

Key drugs For acute infection, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or monoclonal antibodies can be used. While monoclonal antibodies and hydroxychloroquine must be used early on in the disease process, ivermectin has been shown to be effective in all stages of the infection.

Doxycycline or azithromycin are typically added as well, to address any secondary bacterial infection, as well as inhaled budesonide (a steroid). Oral steroids are used on and after the fifth day for pulmonary weakness and aspirin or NAC can be added to reduce the risk of clotting. In the interview, McCullough discusses the use of each of these, and other, drugs.

One drug I disagree with is full-strength aspirin. I believe a potentially better, at least safer, alternative would be to use the enzymes lumbrokinase and serrapeptase, as they help break down and prevent blood clots naturally.

Sources and References

The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola

Read the original post:

The Covid Shots Are Killing People - lewrockwell.com

As calls for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination grow around the world, its becoming ever more crucial to understand what these injections actually are. The mRNA vaccines created by Moderna and Pfizer are in fact gene therapies.

As Ill explain below, theres simply no way around this, and drug manufacturers and public health officials must be made to admit this fact. Why? Because it makes all the difference in the world. You cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-19 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for.

Interestingly enough, mainstream media, fact checkers and various industry front groups insist the gene therapy claim is bogus, even though every single detail about the vaccines shouts otherwise. Why are they spreading this disinformation? Why do they not want you to know what these injections actually are?

In short, they know labeling them as gene therapies would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most people have enough common sense to realize that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad idea, especially for children and younger individuals. Anthrax 9/11: The US C... Webb, George Buy New $1.99 (as of 05:26 UTC - Details)

mRNA Vaccines Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine

To start, lets take a look at some basic definitions of words. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a vaccine is:1

Immunity, in turn, is defined as:

Thats the medical definition. The legal definition, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal:

These definitions, both medical and legal, present problems for mRNA vaccines, since:

Dictionaries Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

Curing the Incurable: ... Levy, MD JD Thomas E Best Price: $22.60 Buy New $18.89 (as of 08:55 UTC - Details) We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined terms. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined5vaccine as a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease. By February 26, 2021, they had updated the definition of vaccine to:6

A preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the bodys immune response against a specific infectious disease:

a:an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)

b:a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)

Lets be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical terminology. It can be used, however, to confuse people. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional definition of vaccine,7as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if changes are made there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is allowed to stand.

mRNA Therapy Doesnt Satisfy Public Health Measure Directive

Theres also the issue of whether a gene therapy can be mandated, and this may hinge on it being accepted as a vaccine. The 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts8essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

Put another way, the ruling argues (although legal experts diverge on some of the finer details of its interpretation) that its acceptable for some individuals to be harmed by a public health directive as long as it benefits the collective. However, if vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to accomplish two things:

How to Live Longer and... Pauling, Linus Best Price: $3.99 Buy New $11.70 (as of 04:15 UTC - Details) Were now back to the original problem that mRNA therapies for COVID-19 do not accomplish either of these things. Since these gene therapies do not render the person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk.

On the contrary, the only one benefiting from an mRNA vaccine is the individual receiving the gene therapy, since all they are designed to do is lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein.

In other words, they wont keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they are only supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, getting vaccinated protects no one but yourself. Since youre the only one who will reap a benefit (less severe COVID-19 symptoms upon infection), the justification to accept the risks of the therapy for the greater good of your community is blatantly irrational.

Marketing mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law

Since mRNA vaccines do not meet the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine, referring to them as vaccines, and marketing them as such, is a deceptive practice that violates915 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,10the law that governs advertising of medical practices.

The lack of completed human trials also puts these mRNA products at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law,11,12it is unlawful to advertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.

Heres the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-19 vaccine trials is not an actual vaccine trial end point because, again, vaccine trial end points have to do with immunity and transmission reduction. Neither of those was measured.

Whats more, key secondary end points in Modernas trial include prevention of severe COVID-19 disease (defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of infection by SARS-CoV-2, regardless of symptoms.13,14However, Moderna did not actually measure rate of infection, stating that it was too impractical to do so.

That means theres no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have competent and reliable scientific evidence substantiating that the claims are true.

Making matters worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control groups by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who want it.15The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the control group, determining effectiveness and risks is going to be near impossible. The Vitamin Cure for I... Andrew W. Saul Best Price: $7.67 Buy New $12.56 (as of 10:17 UTC - Details)

What Makes COVID Vaccines Gene Therapy?

Alright. Lets move on to the definition of gene therapy. As detailed on MedlinePlus.govs What Is Gene Therapy page:16

Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease Researchers are testing several approaches to gene therapy, including: Introducing a new gene into the body to help fight a disease

Although gene therapy is a promising treatment option for a number of diseases (including inherited disorders, some types of cancer, and certain viral infections), the technique remains risky and is still under study to make sure that it will be safe and effective. Gene therapy is currently being tested only for diseases that have no other cures.

Here, its worth noting that there are many differenttreatments that have been shown to be very effective against COVID-19, so it certainly does not qualify as a disease that has no cure. It makes sense that gene therapy should be restricted to incurable diseases, as this is the only time that taking drastic risks might be warranted. That said, heres how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines gene therapy:17

Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use. Gene therapy is a technique that modifies a persons genes to treat or cure disease. Gene therapies can work by several mechanisms:

Replacing a disease-causing gene with a healthy copy of the gene

Inactivating a disease-causing gene that is not functioning properly

Introducing a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease

November 17, 2020, the American Society of Gene + Cell Therapy (ASGCT) announced COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates Show Gene Therapy Is a Viable Strategy, noting that:18

Two COVID-19 vaccine trials, both of which use messenger RNA (or mRNA) technology to teach the body to fight the virus, have reported efficacy over 90 percent.

These findings, announced by Moderna on Nov. 16 and by Pfizer and its partner BioNTech on Nov. 9 demonstrate that gene therapy is a viable strategy for developing vaccines to combat COVID-19.

Both vaccine candidates use mRNA to program a persons cells to produce many copies of a fragment of the virus. The fragment then stimulates the immune system to attack if the real virus tries to invade the body.

mRNA Deliver New Genetic Instructions

As explained in the ASGCTs video above, mRNA are molecules that contain genetic instructions for making various proteins. mRNA vaccines deliver a synthetic version of mRNA into your cells that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune system to produce antibodies. Then theres Modernas trial website,19where they describe their technology thus: How Not To Die With Tr... Henriques, Tiago Best Price: $18.23 Buy New $17.97 (as of 08:00 UTC - Details)

Typical vaccines for viruses are made from a weakened or inactive virus, but mRNA-1273 is not made from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is made from messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), a genetic code that tells cells how to make protein, which help the bodys immune system make antibodies to fight the virus.

November 18, 2020, Wired magazine made a big deal about COVID-19 vaccines being genetic vaccines, noting:20

The active ingredient inside their shot is mRNA mobile strings of genetic code that contain the blueprints for proteins. Cells use mRNA to get those specs out of hard DNA storage and into their protein-making factories. The mRNA inside Pfizer and BioNTechs vaccine directs any cells it reaches to run a coronavirus spike-building program.

Importantly, as reported by David Martin, Ph.D.,21,22Moderna describes its product not as a vaccine, but as gene therapy technology in SEC filings. This is because neither Moderna nor Pfizer make any claims about their products creating immunity or preventing transmission. Additionally, Modernas SEC filings specifically state that Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA, as well.23

mRNA Is Proven Form of Gene Therapy

In a February 2021 article, MIT Technology Review reviewed the history of mRNA technology in general, and Modernas in particular, stating:24

Vaccines were not their focus. At the companys founding in 2010, its leaders imagined they might be able to use RNA to replace the injected proteins that make up most of the biotech pharmacopoeia, essentially producing drugs inside the patients own cells from an RNA blueprint. We were asking, could we turn a human into a bioreactor? says Noubar Afeyan, the companys cofounder

Bloomberg, in August 2020, reported25that the Moderna vaccine would seek to transform your body into a vaccine-making machine. The New York Times was more to the point. In May 2020, they reported26that Researchers at two Harvard-affiliated hospitals are adapting a proven form of gene therapy to develop a coronavirus vaccine. Read it again A proven form of gene therapy.

So, to summarize: The definition of genetic is something relating to genes, and the definition of therapy is the medical treatment of a disease. The definition of gene therapy is the process of modifying or manipulating the expression of a gene, or altering the biological properties of living cells.

mRNA are snippets of genetic code that instructs cells to produce proteins. mRNA COVID-19 therapies deliver genetic instructions into your cells, thereby triggering your body to produce a fragment of the virus (the spike protein). So, mRNA vaccines ARE gene therapy. Theres simply no way around this. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine.

Defining COVID-19

Theres yet one more potential problem with the COVID-19 vaccine narrative as a whole, which Martin unpacked in a January 25, 2021, interview on the Wise Traditions podcast (above).27In it, he explains:

COVID-19 is not a disease. It is a series of clinical symptoms. It is a giant umbrella of things associated with what used to be associated with influenza and with other febrile diseases.

The problem that we have is that in February [2020], the World Health Organization was clear in stating that there should not be a conflation between [SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19]. One is a virus, in their definition, and one is a set of clinical symptoms. The illusion in February was that SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-19.

The problem with that definition, and with the expectation, is that the majority of people who test positive using the RT-PCR method for testing, for fragments of what is associated with SARS-CoV-2, are not ill at all. The illusion that the virus causes a disease fell apart. Thats the reason why they invented the term asymptomatic carrier.

In short, SARS-CoV-2 has yet to be definitively proven to be the actual cause of COVID-19. So, a gene therapy that instructs your body to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen the viral spike protein cannot even be touted as a preventative against COVID-19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked.

They have been willfully lying since the inception of this,Martin says in the interview.There is not a causal link between these things It has never even been close to established.

We have a situation where the illusion of the problem is that people say, I dont want to get COVID-19. What they mean is they dont want to get infected with a virus. The problem is those two things are not related to each other. A viral infection hasnt been documented in the majority of what is called cases.

There is no basis for that conflation other than the manipulation of the public. Thats the first half of the problem. The second half of the problem is that what is being touted as a vaccination is not a vaccine. This is gene therapy

What is this doing? Its sending a strand of synthetic RNA into the human being and is invoking within the human being, the creation of the S1 spike protein, which is a pathogen A vaccine is supposed to trigger immunity. Its not supposed to trigger you to make a toxin

Its not somewhat different. Its not the same at all Its not a prohibiting infection. Its not a prohibiting transmission device. Its a means by which your body is conscripted to make the toxin that then, allegedly, your body somehow gets used to dealing with, but unlike a vaccine which is to trigger the immune response this is to trigger the creation of the toxin.

Why the Misrepresentation?

As for why drug companies are misrepresenting this technology, Martin suspects its done exclusively so that they can get themselves under the umbrella of public health laws that exploit vaccination.

Experimental gene therapies do not have financial liability shielding from the government, but pandemic vaccines do, even in the experimental stage, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. This is indeed a major incentive to make sure this technology is perceived as a vaccine and nothing else.

So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-19 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene therapy companies so that they are insulated from any liability.

Experimental Gene Therapy Is a Bad Idea

Ive written many articles detailing the potential and expected side effects of these gene therapy vaccines. If all of this is new to you, consider reviewing How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System, Seniors Dying After COVID Vaccine Labeled as Natural Causes and Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine.

The take-home message here is that these injections are not vaccines. They do not prevent infection, they do not render you immune and they do not prevent transmission of the disease. Instead, they alter your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch. Whats happening here is a medical fraud of unprecedented magnitude, and it really needs to be stopped before its too late for a majority of people.

If you already got the vaccine and now regret it, you may be able to address your symptoms using the same strategies youd use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I review these strategies at the end of Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce.

Last but not least, if you got the vaccine and are having side effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Childrens Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a COVID-19 vaccine to do these three things:28

Sources and References

The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola

Link:

Covid-19 Vaccines Are Gene Therapy - LewRockwell

1. Flu vaccine shows signs of effectiveness  KSTP
2. Updated COVID shots are coming. They're part of a trio of vaccines to block fall viruses  The Associated Press
3. COVID-19, flu and RSV vaccines are all available this fall: See what some doctors recommend and why  Fox News

Read the original here:

Flu vaccine shows signs of effectiveness - KSTP

Writes Greg Privette:

Hi Lew,

First thing that came to my mind; Dr. Jill, the vaccine shill.

My skeptical side wonders if in these high profile cases the person is even ill, or if it is just to convince the rubes the virus is making a big comeback and its important for everyone to mask up and get a booster. Not that I think they would actually lie to us! It also made me think about the changing language. Remember the quaint old days when if someone said the word booster, the first thing to come to mind was someone who financially supports their college football team.

Read this article:

Vaccine Insanity - lewrockwell.com

In hopeful sign for the US, flu vaccine shows strong protection against hospitalization in South America, CDC report shows  CNN

Link:

In hopeful sign for the US, flu vaccine shows strong protection against hospitalization in South America, CDC report shows - CNN