Category: Vaccine

Page 148«..1020..147148149150..160170..»

Study finds prenatal vaccination protects infants from COVID – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

November 11, 2023

Infants as old as 6 months were protected from COVID-19 infections only when mothers were vaccinated prenatally, and not before pregnancy, according to a new study in JAMA Network Open.

The study is one of the largest to compare outcomes among infants whose mothers were vaccinated before pregnancy, during pregnancy, or were unvaccinated at the time of birth.

Infants younger than 6 months are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19, and accounted for 44% of all pediatric COVID hospitalizations during the Omicron dominant period beginning in December 2021. Infants younger than 6 months remain the only group ineligible for COVID vaccination in the United States.

The present study was based on outcomes seen among all infants born to registered Singapore citizens and permanent residents between January 1, 2022, and September 30, 2022. Only infants whose parents had a confirmed case of COVID-19 during their first 6 months were included in the study.

"By selecting only infants with definite infant exposure to the virus due to the close contact between parents and newborn infants, we limited the possibility of the healthy vaccinee bias and overestimation of estimated vaccine effectiveness for infants," the authors explained.

A total of 7,292 infants were included in the study, of whom 7,120 infants (97.6%) were born to mothers who had been fully vaccinated or boosted as of 14 days prior to delivery with mRNA vaccines. Of those, 39.5% were born to mothers who received their second dose during pregnancy, and 3,661 infants (50.2%) were born to mothers who received a third dose (booster) during pregnancy.

There may be a need for mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to be recommended for every pregnancy similar to maternal influenza and pertussis vaccination in order to maintain protection in newborns.

A total of 1,272 infants (17.4%) born to parents who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 postpartum also became infected during the study period, with a crude incidence rate of 174.3 per 100,000 person-days among infants born to unvaccinated mothers, 122.2 per 100,000 person-days among infants born to mothers vaccinated before pregnancy, and 128.5 per 100,000 person-days among infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy.

The estimated vaccine efficacy (VE) was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], -17.6% to 39.1%) for infants born to mothers vaccinated before pregnancy, and 41.5% (95% CI, 22.8% to 55.7%) among infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy.

The VE increased to 44.4% (95% CI, 26.2% to 58.1%) if mothers received a third dose (booster), compared with 37.6% (95% CI, 17.2% to 53.1%) if mothers received their second dose, the authors said.

"There may be a need for mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to be recommended for every pregnancy similar to maternal influenza and pertussis vaccination in order to maintain protection in newborns," the authors said.

More here:

Study finds prenatal vaccination protects infants from COVID - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

Quick takes: H5N1 strikes more Finnish fur farms, UK vaccine … – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

November 11, 2023

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) yesterday announced that it has approved Valneva's chikungunya vaccine, the first vaccine of its kind against the mosquito-borne disease. Called Ixchiq, the vaccine is approved for those ages 18 and older at increased risk for the disease.

Chikungunya is considered an emerging global health threat, with at least 5 million cases reported over the last 15 years, mainly in areas where the mosquito that carries the virus is endemic. The most-affected regions include Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Americas. The FDA said chikungunya is spreading to new areas, which has led to a rise in global prevalence.

The disease isn't usually fatal but is known to cause fever and sometimes debilitating joint pain that can last months to years. Other symptoms include rash, headache, and muscle pain. Transmission to babies from mothers during pregnancy can cause potentially fatal infections.

Peter Marks, MD, PhD, who directs the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement, "Today's approval addresses an unmet medical need and is an important advancement in the prevention of a potentially debilitating disease with limited treatment options."

The live attenuated vaccine is given as a single dose, and the vaccine effects can be similar to chikungunya illness symptoms. The FDA is requiring the company to do a postmarketing study to evaluate the risk of severe reactions following Ixchinq immunization. The prescribing information contains a warning that it's not known if the vaccine virus can transmit or cause any adverse effects in newborns.

Valneva, in a statement today, said the accelerated approval is based on neutralizing antibody titers and that continued approval hinges on studies that confirm a clinical benefit. Its phase 3 study found a 98.9% seroresponse rate at 28 days that was sustained at 96.3% 6 months after vaccination. It said it plans to commercialize the vaccine in early 2024 and is working toward a vote by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine advisory group in February 2024.

The rest is here:

Quick takes: H5N1 strikes more Finnish fur farms, UK vaccine ... - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

RFK Jr. comes home to his anti-vaccine group, commits to a break for U.S. infectious disease research – NBC News

November 6, 2023

At an anti-vaccine conference in Georgia on Friday, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. confirmed his commitment to the cause and spoke to his base about how he, as president, would serve the movement he built.

I feel like Ive come home today, he said to a standing ovation, crediting the assembled audience with his candidacy.

He then laid out his vision for a Kennedy presidency, which would include telling the National Institutes of Health to take a break from studying infectious diseases, like Covid-19 and measles, and pivoting the agency to the study of chronic diseases, like diabetes and obesity. Kennedy has suggested without evidence that researchers and pharmaceutical companies are driven by profit to neglect such chronic conditions and invest in ineffective and even harmful treatments; he includes vaccines among them.

Im gonna say to NIH scientists, God bless you all, Kennedy said. Thank you for public service. Were going to give infectious disease a break for about eight years.

Kennedys remarks came at the end of the first day of a conference for the countrys largest anti-vaccine organization, Childrens Health Defense. Kennedy signed on with Childrens Health Defense in 2015 and served as its chairman and chief litigation counsel until April, when he announced he would go on leave to run for president.

Currently running as an independent candidate, Kennedy is polling favorably among voters across the political spectrum. In a hypothetical 2024 general election matchup, according to a Quinnipiac University poll this week, Kennedy received 22% support against Biden (39%) and Trump (36%).

Kennedy has mostly shied away from anti-vaccine advocacy on the campaign trail and has said, despite years of public statements to the contrary, that he is not opposed to vaccines. This spring, he told NBC News vaccines were not an issue that Im leading with.

A representative for Childrens Health Defense declined my request to attend the conference in person, citing my record of reporting on CHDs themes and activities. NBC News paid $275 for a virtual ticket and watched the conference via a livestream provided to remote attendees.

In the hourlong speech, Kennedy covered well-worn subjects, railing against the evils of pharmaceutical companies, warning against researchers who he said improperly frame scientific findings for profit, and expounding on conspiracy theories around Covid measures, including what he called the totalitarian regime that controls public health and censorship of dissenting voices. Referring to vaccines, he said to the mothers in the audience: You have a duty to do research when youre giving your child a medical intervention.

In addition to his proposed moves at NIH, Kennedy said that as president, hed appoint a like-minded attorney general, maybe Aaron Siri, he said. Siri is a lawyer who has done millions of dollars of work for leading anti-vaccination groups, including a recent case that opened up religious exemptions for childhood vaccines in Mississippi. The crowd erupted in applause.

He said he would use the power of that attorney general to threaten editors of medical journals and force them to publish studies that had been retracted (he often cites the retracted studies saying ivermectin, a parasite drug, is an effective treatment for Covid). Were gonna say were fixing to file some racketeering lawsuits if you dont start telling the truth in your journals.

Before Kennedys speech, an announcer told the crowd that as a nonprofit, Childrens Health Defense does not endorse political candidates. But evidence of Kennedys anti-vaccine support is abundant. Childrens Health Defenses employees have been selling merchandise at Kennedy campaign events, and its current president served as a strategist, fundraiser and organizer for Kennedys campaign. The super PAC supporting Kennedys candidacy is run by a former president of Childrens Health Defenses New York chapter.

Most Americans, particularly Democrats, do not share Kennedys skeptical views on vaccines, but confidence in vaccines has fallen post-Covid. A small but growing number of Americans believe that vaccines are unsafe and can cause autism, which is false, according to a new survey from the University of Pennsylvanias Annenberg Public Policy Center.

Childrens Health Defense cheered the increasing distrust of vaccines during the pandemic, calling drops in childhood vaccination rates Covids silver lining. The swell in attention on vaccines and Kennedys enthusiastic activism against them served Childrens Health Defense well. In 2021, the group raised nearly $16 million, more than 4 times its revenue in 2019. Kennedys salary grew to more than $500,000.

Kennedys remarks closed out the first day of the conference. Earlier speakers included other heroes of the anti-vaccine movement: Paul Thomas, an Oregon pediatrician whose medical license was suspended and ultimately surrendered after he failed to adequately vaccinate his patients; James Lyons-Weiler, an activist who incorrectly claims a gene sequence in Covid proves the laboratory-origin hypothesis; and Andrew Wakefield, the physician stripped of his license over a retracted study that popularized the false belief that the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines cause autism.

I want to thank all of you for being on the front line in this battle, Kennedy said as he concluded, before pausing. I dont think I can say anything thats campaign-related, but anyway you know what to do.

After his remarks, attendees were invited to a cocktail reception and dinner with Childrens Health Defense leaders, conference speakers and medical freedom fighters. The event is to include a silent auction and a ceremony for the groups new Defender Award. The awards inaugural recipient, recognized for his courage and steadfast commitment to truth and liberty, is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Brandy Zadrozny is a senior reporter for NBC News. She covers misinformation, extremism and the internet.

See the article here:

RFK Jr. comes home to his anti-vaccine group, commits to a break for U.S. infectious disease research - NBC News

Don’t blame the COVID experts for miscommunication | Letters – Tampa Bay Times

November 6, 2023

Dont blame the experts

Insults based on science miss the mark | Perspective, Oct. 29

The column by F.D. Flam about the book The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science A Scientists Warning by Peter Hotez was interesting. The critics who say that public health professionals were not communicating well and that they need to educate people and let them make decisions regarding their health care are misguided. The U.S. required vaccines for children in order to attend public school. This, until recently, had been a decision not left to parents. Since this country has allowed parents to opt out of vaccines, we have seen increases in diseases that were unheard of years ago.

The reason so many people refused the COVID vaccine (and other vaccines) along with other measures to keep themselves safe had to do with where they got information about COVID, not the messages coming from public health officials. Some TV networks were reporting untruths. Also, there were recommendations made at the beginning of the pandemic that proved to be wrong. Scientists were confronted with something they had not seen before. This is how science works. Some things are found not to work and some are found to be helpful. Normally scientists do experiments to determine these recommendations. During COVID, they were trying every possible method of stopping communicable disease.

Ann Jamieson, St. Petersburg

Teens are on their screens 8 hours a day for fun & games | Column, Oct. 29

Where is the outrage? Social media, games, YouTube, X (Twitter), TikTok and its ilk are just like an addictive drug, a drug that is dismantling, depressing and destroying our youth. Moderation and balance are promoted, yet the crisis is an epidemic. A complete overhaul is needed of the cultural acceptance of our kids spending 8 hours a day, on average no less, on social media.

Given there are 24 hours in a day, assuming we allot eight hours for sleep (nope, kids arent getting that but they should), six hours for being in school, and then the eight hours for online social media, a meager two hours are left in the day for life. What is the end game of this? Where is this leading for our kids, for us?

The crisis is here. The adults in the room thats us need to fix this. Otherwise, the futures not bright for our kids and our way of life. Please make this, and efforts to combat it, front-page headline news, not something buried on page 66 of the news.

Steve Cassidy, St. Petersburg

16 Montana teens lesson for Floridians on constitutional right to clean water | Column, June 2

Most people associate Florida with clear ocean waters, white sand or the manatee. Each year, millions of people travel to the Sunshine State to enjoy its beautiful beaches, contributing significantly to the Florida economy. However, the quality of Florida beaches has significantly declined due to water pollution, harmful algal blooms and the unpleasant sight and smell of marine life carcasses strewn along the shoreline. We must take action to both protect and preserve Floridas natural beauty and also to keep the economy strong.

Subscribe to our free Stephinitely newsletter

Columnist Stephanie Hayes will share thoughts, feelings and funny business with you every Monday.

Want more of our free, weekly newslettersinyourinbox? Letsgetstarted.

Agricultural and fertilizer runoff and industrial discharge are both significant contributors to the declining water quality. They add excessive nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen, which make algal blooms (like red tide) become more frequent. These blooms have detrimental effects not only on the water and aquatic animals but also on humans. Harmful algal blooms can produce toxins that may cause breathing difficulties if inhaled, and they can pose health concerns for those who consume seafood contaminated by the toxins.

This must end. Join me and the Florida Right To Clean Water, a citizens initiative to amend the Florida Constitution with the right to clean water. Its up to we the people to create hope and change. We need 900,000 physically signed petitions by Nov. 30 to get on the 2024 ballot. Help us protect Florida waters before its too late.

Kaleigh Thadhani, Tampa

Biden meets with speaker over Israel, Ukraine aid | Oct. 27

We cant fund every war on the globe. So now we are also supporting a war in Israel. Its time to hand off the ball to Europe to handle Ukraine war. Its on their doorstep. Let them go broke supporting that war. While were going broke fighting all the other wars around the globe, I think our wallets have had enough.

Bob Green, Largo

Big premiums, big profits | Nov. 1

In December, under Gov. Ron DeSantis direction, the Florida Legislature passed laws gifting the insurance companies with new protections based on unproven claims about why homeowners insurance premiums are so high, and some lawmakers started to figure out ways to profit off those same in my view ill-conceived laws. We middle-class Floridians cant afford much more profitable mismanagement from our elected officials. I think its time to dump the whole Republican Party in Florida and see if the Democrats can competently run the state. Based on the past 20 years of Republican ineptitude the Democrats could hardly do worse.

Brian Valsavage, St. Petersburg

Read more here:

Don't blame the COVID experts for miscommunication | Letters - Tampa Bay Times

Natural killer cell responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in people living with HIV-1 | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

November 6, 2023

Geretti, A. M. et al. Outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related hospitalization among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the ISARIC World Health Organization (WHO) clinical characterization protocol (UK): A prospective observational study. Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1605 (2020).

Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bhaskaran, K. et al. HIV infection and COVID-19 death: A population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care data and linked national death registrations within the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet HIV 8, e24e32 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tesoriero, J. M. et al. COVID-19 outcomes among persons living with or without diagnosed HIV infection in New York State. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2037069 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Recommendations from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) on COVID vaccines, third doses and boosters: Update for service users. https://www.bhiva.org/recommendations-from-the-JCVI-on-COVID-vaccines-third-doses-and-boosters. Accessed 17 Dec 2021.

Touizer, E. et al. Attenuated humoral responses in HIV after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination linked to B cell defects and altered immune profiles. iScience 26, 105862 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Touizer, E. et al. Failure to seroconvert after two doses of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a patient with uncontrolled HIV. Lancet HIV 8, e317e318 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Vergori, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant neutralization after third dose vaccination in PLWH. Viruses 14, 1710 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Vergori, A. et al. Immunogenicity to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine third dose in people living with HIV. Nat. Commun. 13, 4922 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Diamond, M. S., Lambris, J. D., Ting, J. P. & Tsang, J. S. Considering innate immune responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 465470 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lee, M. J. & Blish, C. A. Defining the role of natural killer cells in COVID-19. Nat. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-023-01560-8 (2023).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Di Vito, C. et al. Natural killer cells in SARS-CoV-2 infection: Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Front. Immunol. 13, 888248 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bjrkstrm, N. K., Strunz, B. & Ljunggren, H.-G. Natural killer cells in antiviral immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00558-3 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cox, A. et al. Targeting natural killer cells to enhance vaccine responses. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 42, 789801 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Maucourant, C. et al. Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabd6832 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bi, J. NK cell dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 19, 127129 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Narni-Mancinelli, E. & Vivier, E. Clues that natural killer cells help to control COVID. Nature 600, 226227 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bao, C. et al. Natural killer cells associated with SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA shedding, antibody response and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 10, 5 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Krmer, B. et al. Early IFN- signatures and persistent dysfunction are distinguishing features of NK cells in severe COVID-19. Immunity 54, 2650-2669.e14 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Witkowski, M. et al. Untimely TGF responses in COVID-19 limit antiviral functions of NK cells. Nature 600, 295301 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kuan Brli, P. & Brizi, I. Taking on SARS-CoV-2. eLife 11, e80552 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hammer, Q. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 encodes for an HLA-E-stabilizing peptide that abrogates inhibition of NKG2A-expressing NK cells. Cell Rep. 38, 110503 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hagemann, K. et al. Natural killer cell-mediated ADCC in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and vaccine recipients. Eur. J. Immunol. 52, 12971307 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tso, F. Y. et al. Presence of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 plasma. PloS One 16, e0247640 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fielding, C. A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 host-shutoff impacts innate NK cell functions, but antibody-dependent NK activity is strongly activated through non-spike antibodies. eLife 11, e74489 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rieke, G. J. et al. Natural killer cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection is more potent than after vaccination. J. Infect. Dis. 225, 16881693 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dufloo, J. et al. Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit polyfunctional antibodies. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100275 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yu, Y. et al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 110 (2021).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gorman, M. J. et al. Fab and Fc contribute to maximal protection against SARS-CoV-2 following NVX-CoV2373 subunit vaccine with Matrix-M vaccination. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100405 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mercado, N. B. et al. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature 586, 583588 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yu, J. et al. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science 369, 806811 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Anand, S. P. et al. Longitudinal analysis of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Spike in convalescent individuals up to 8 months post-symptom onset. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100290 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lee, W. S. et al. Decay of Fc-dependent antibody functions after mild to moderate COVID-19. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100296 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Grunst, M. W. & Uchil, P. D. Fc effector cross-reactivity: A hidden arsenal against SARS-CoV-2s evasive maneuvering. Cell Rep. Med. 3, 100540 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Richardson, S. I. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Beta and Delta variants trigger Fc effector function with increased cross-reactivity. Cell Rep. Med. 3, 100510 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hensley, K. S. et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in people living with HIV in the Netherlands: A nationwide prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 19, e1003979 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Peppa, D. et al. Adaptive reconfiguration of natural killer cells in HIV-1 infection. Front. Immunol. 9, 474 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Brunetta, E. et al. Chronic HIV-1 viremia reverses NKG2A/NKG2C ratio on natural killer cells in patients with human cytomegalovirus co-infection. AIDS 24, 2734 (2010).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Gondois-Rey, F. et al. NKG2C+ memory-like NK cells contribute to the control of HIV viremia during primary infection: Optiprim-ANRS 147. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 6, e150 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, J. et al. An NK cell population lacking FcR is expanded in chronically infected HIV patients. J. Immunol. 194, 46884697 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Schlums, H. et al. Cytomegalovirus infection drives adaptive epigenetic diversification of NK cells with altered signaling and effector function. Immunity 42, 443456 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lee, J. et al. Epigenetic modification and antibody-dependent expansion of memory-like NK cells in human cytomegalovirus-infected individuals. Immunity 42, 431442 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, Y. et al. HIV-1-induced cytokines deplete homeostatic innate lymphoid cells and expand TCF7-dependent memory NK cells. Nat. Immunol. 21, 274286 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hammer, Q. et al. Peptide-specific recognition of human cytomegalovirus strains controls adaptive natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol. 19, 453463 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shah, S. V. et al. CMV primes functional alternative signaling in adaptive g NK cells but is subverted by lentivirus infection in rhesus macaques. Cell Rep. 25, 2766-2774.e3 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Peppa, D. Natural killer cells in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection: Spotlight on the impact of human cytomegalovirus. Front. Immunol. 8, 1322 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lanier, L. L., Yu, G. & Phillips, J. H. Analysis of Fc gamma RIII (CD16) membrane expression and association with CD3 zeta and Fc epsilon RI-gamma by site-directed mutation. J. Immunol. 1950(146), 15711576 (1991).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, W. et al. FcR gene editing reprograms conventional NK cells to display key features of adaptive human NK cells. iScience 23, 101709 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shemesh, A. et al. Diminished cell proliferation promotes natural killer cell adaptive-like phenotype by limiting FcRI expression. J. Exp. Med. 219, e20220551 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hwang, I. et al. Identification of human NK cells that are deficient for signaling adaptor FcR and specialized for antibody-dependent immune functions. Int. Immunol. 24, 793802 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Baslio-Queirs, D. et al. Adaptive NK cells undergo a dynamic modulation in response to human cytomegalovirus and recruit T cells in in vitro migration assays. Bone Marrow Transpl. 57, 712720 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Duhan, V. et al. NK cell-intrinsic FcRI limits CD8+ T-cell expansion and thereby turns an acute into a chronic viral infection. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007797 (2019).

Go here to see the original:

Natural killer cell responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in people living with HIV-1 | Scientific Reports - Nature.com

COVID-19 vaccine safety report – 02-11-23 – Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

November 6, 2023

The most frequently reported side effects suspected to be associated with the vaccines include headache, muscle pain, fever, fatigue and nausea. Skin reactions at the site of the injection are also common and can include pain, swelling, redness and an itchy rash. These are recognised side effects of vaccination and are usually transient and mild.

The most up-to-date vaccine recommendations for children are available from ATAGI.

The TGA is closely monitoring adverse event reports in people aged under 18 years. Reporting rates of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, including those for children and adolescents, are very stable. More detail on vaccine safety in children and adolescents following vaccination is available in the safety report published on 15 December 2022.

The most up-to-date vaccine recommendations for booster doses are available from ATAGI.

The TGA continues to monitor the safety of booster vaccine doses in adults. A booster dose is an additional vaccine dose given after the primary vaccine course. In people who have recently had COVID-19, a 6-month interval is recommended before having their next scheduled dose.

Reporting rates of adverse events following booster doses are very stable. A small number of myocarditis and pericarditis cases have been reported for booster doses. We are closely monitoring these events. So far, reports of myocarditis after a booster dose are very rare, occurring in less than 1 in every 100,000 doses administered.

Information on vaccine safety following booster doses is available in the safety report published on 15 December 2022.

Vaccines can lead to death in extremely rare instances. However, most deaths that occur after vaccination are not caused by the vaccine. In large populations in which a new vaccine is given, there are people with underlying diseases who may die from these diseases. When a vaccine is given in that same population, the link between the vaccine and death is usually coincidental not caused by the vaccine. These deaths are carefully reviewed to assess whether vaccines could be the cause and for the vast majority that is not the case.

The TGA closely reviews all deaths reported in the days and weeks after COVID-19 vaccination. Read more about this process in a previous report. Since the beginning of the vaccine rollout to 29 October 2023, almost 69 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been given in Australia. The TGA has identified 14 reports where the cause of death was linked to vaccination from 1,004 reports received and reviewed.There have been no new vaccine-related deaths identified since 2022.

The 14 deaths likely to be related to vaccination occurred in people aged 21-81 years old. There have been no deaths in children or adolescents determined to be linked to COVID-19 vaccination. More detail on these deaths is available in the safety report published on 15December 2022.

If we identify a new death likely to be related to vaccination, we will publish this information promptly, as we have for all other cases since the start of the vaccine roll-out.

It is important when looking for information about COVID-19 vaccines to consider whether the source of the information is credible and trustworthy. Websites such as COVID vaccines is it true? and COVID-19 vaccines: Frequently asked questions help to debunk false claims and misleading rumours.

The original Comirnaty (Pfizer) vaccine is provisionally approved for adults and children aged 5 years and over. Two bivalent vaccines are available from Pfizer for use as booster doses Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.1 and Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5.

To 29 October 2023, more than 44 million doses have been administered in Australia, as well as almost 2.9 million doses of the bivalent booster vaccines.

The TGA continues to monitor reports of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) and/or pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) associated with mRNA vaccines.

Rates of these side effects are very stable. Myocarditis is reported in around 1-2 in every 100,000 people who receive Comirnaty (Pfizer). More detail on our analysis of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination is available in a previous vaccine safety report.

Go to the Comirnaty (Pfizer) information page to find out more about these vaccines.

Up-to-date information for Comirnaty (Pfizer), including details of potential side effects, can be found in the Consumer Medicine Information (for consumers) and Product Information (for health professionals).

The Spikevax vaccine is fully approved for adults and children aged 6 years and over. Two bivalent vaccines are available from Moderna for use as booster doses Spikevax Original/Omicron BA.1 and Spikevax Original/Omicron BA.4-5 vaccine.

To 29 October 2023, more than 5million doses have been administered in Australia, as well as almost 1.4 million doses of the bivalent booster vaccines.

The TGA continues to monitor reports of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) and/or pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) associated with mRNA vaccines.

Rates of these side effects are very stable. Myocarditis is reported in around 2 in every 100,000 of those who receive Spikevax (Moderna). More detail on our analysis of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination is available in a previous vaccine safety report.

Go to the Spikevax (Moderna) information page to find out more about these vaccines.

Up-to-date information for Spikevax (Moderna), including details of potential side effects, can be found in the Consumer Medicine Information (for consumers) and Product Information (for health professionals).

TheNuvaxovid (Novavax) vaccine is provisionally approved for adults. To 29 October 2023, almost 268,000 doses of Nuvaxovid (Novavax) have been administered in Australia.

The TGA continues to monitor reports of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) and pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) following vaccination.

Rates of these side effects are very stable. Myocarditis is reported in around 4 in every 100,000 people who receive the Nuvaxovid (Novavax) vaccine. More detail on our analysis of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Nuvaxovid (Novavax) is available in a previous vaccine safety report.

Go to the Nuvaxovid (Novavax) information page to find out more about this vaccine.

More information for Nuvaxovid (Novavax), including details about its ingredients and potential side effects, can be found in the Consumer Medicine Information (for consumers) and Product Information (for health professionals).

The Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) vaccine is no longer available for use in Australia. Almost 14million doses of Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) were administered when it was in use.

Go to the Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) information page to find out more about this vaccine.

More general information for Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca), including details of potential side effects can be found in the Consumer Medicine Information (for consumers) and Product Information (for health professionals).

Watch this video to find out how the TGA monitors and reports the safety of COVID-19 vaccines

COVID-19 vaccines: Frequently asked questions 26 July 2023

COVID vaccines is it true? 8 May 2023

Latest clinical recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines in Australia 5 October 2023

Latest advice on COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant and breastfeeding women

TGA COVID-19 vaccines hub

Australian Government Department of Health COVID-19 vaccines hub

COVID vaccine information in your language

Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN)

AusVaxSafety a national survey on COVID-19 vaccine safety

See the original post here:

COVID-19 vaccine safety report - 02-11-23 - Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

Vaccine confidence falls as belief in health misinformation grows … – Penn Today

November 6, 2023

Americans have less confidence in vaccines to address a variety of illnesses than they did just a year or two ago, and more people accept misinformation about vaccines and COVID-19, according to the latest health survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC).

The survey, conducted in October 2023 with a panel of over 1,500 U.S. adults, finds that the number of Americans who think vaccines approved for use in the United States are safe dropped to 71% from 77% in April 2021. The percentage of adults who dont think vaccines approved in the U.S. are safe grew to 16% from 9% over that same two-and-a-half-year period.

Despite concerted efforts by news organizations, public health officials, scientists, and fact-checkers (including APPCs project FactCheck.org) to counter viral misinformation about vaccination and COVID-19, the survey finds that some false or unproven claims about them are more widely accepted today than two to three years ago. Although the proportion of the American public that holds these beliefs is, in some cases, still relatively small, the survey finds growth in misinformation acceptance across many questions touching on vaccination.

There are warning signs in these data that we ignore at our peril, says Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center and director of the survey. Growing numbers now distrust health-protecting, life-saving vaccines.

The survey results find that less than two-thirds of Americans think is it safer to get the COVID-19 vaccine than the COVID-19 disease, a decline from 75% in April 2021. Over a quarter incorrectly think ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19, up dramatically from 10% in September 2021. Additionally, a small but growing number believe that increased vaccines are why so many kids have autism these days, up from 10% in April 2021. And lastly, when asked when they expected to return to their normal, pre-COVID life, two-thirds say they already have. Three-quarters say they never or rarely wear a mask or face covering.

Read more at Annenberg Public Policy Center.

More here:

Vaccine confidence falls as belief in health misinformation grows ... - Penn Today

The disgraceful rumors that Matthew Perry died because of the … – Washington Examiner

November 6, 2023

Friends star Matthew Perry was laid to rest in a private ceremony at Forest Lawn Memorial Park in Los Angeles on Friday, multiple outlets reported. The actor died over a week ago after being found unresponsive on Oct. 28 at his home in a hot tub. His death was initially reported as a drowning. Perry was 54 years old.

Unfortunately, shortly after reports of his death, wild rumors and baseless allegations surfaced across social media platforms that Perry may have died because he received the COVID-19 vaccine. Despite not having any proof, these baseless allegations spread like wildfire, fueled by a tweet Perry sent out years ago revealing his support for the vaccine.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED COURTROOM SKETCH ARTIST NAVIGATING POPULARITY AND 'A LOT OF HATERS'

It was indicative of just how toxic the anti-vaccination crowd can truly be.

Its one thing to criticize government officials who were wrong about the vaccines efficacy. And its another to voice concerns over being forced to vaccinate during a pandemic. But baselessly assuming that Perrys death a person with a long history of alcohol and substance abuse was because of the vaccine is reckless, irresponsible, and, quite frankly, altogether stupid.

Consider Perrys history with addiction that he mentioned in Friends, Lovers, and the Big Terrible Thing, the memoir he published in 2022. The Fools Rush In star admitted to having a sobriety battle that lasted over a decade, including an addiction to painkillers, including, at one point, taking 55 Vicodin a day, Fox News reported. Additionally, Perry had 15 stints in rehab, 14 surgeries, was in a coma for two weeks, and, at one point, was on life support.

But despite this repeated abuse to his body, many were adamant that it was the COVID-19 vaccine that caused his death. Perry beat up his body for years, but anti-vaxxers baselessly claimed it was the vaccine. There wasnt any proof, mind you, that the vaccine contributed to it. Claiming such was just a baseless conspiracy. Whether it is Matthew Perry, NFL player Damar Hamling, or any random person, finding imaginary links between the COVID-19 vaccine and sudden death has become an obsession.

This is just disturbing and irrational behavior.

Its perfectly valid to criticize the government, the science, and the experts for their errors regarding the vaccine. Those who promoted the vaccine as an effective means of preventing the spread of COVID-19 deserve criticism, which I have written about numerous times myself.

However, it is important to stick to the facts. Promoting scary stories that arent true about the vaccine does nothing but discredit the people promoting such lies. And, as mentioned above, suggesting the vaccines were the reason for his death while ignoring his years of self-harm and substance abuse is complete lunacy. These are people who legitimately want the vaccine to be the cause of Perrys death.

Its as if it offers them a disturbing sense of validation. Its sadistic.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Theres not one shred of evidence that the vaccine had anything to do with Perrys passing. Unfortunately, the anti-vaccination mob has morphed into the polar opposite of the "COVIDphobe" crowd, with each promoting fanatical hyperbolic hysteria of imminent death and doom. At this point, they are two sides of the same coin, each championing their agenda and spreading misinformation. Both ignore reality and are entirely irrational agents of chaos.

Let Matthew Perry rest in peace. Neither he nor his family deserve to become the poster child for whatever current wacky conspiracy the anti-vaccination crowd wants to promote.

See original here:

The disgraceful rumors that Matthew Perry died because of the ... - Washington Examiner

Covid Vaccine Injury Suit May Fuel Federal Overhaul, Litigation – Bloomberg Law

November 6, 2023

A lawsuit by Covid-19 vaccine recipients claiming they were injured by their shots may usher in long-awaited changes to how the federal government handles immunization injuries.

Individuals frustrated by the HHS program designed to compensate them for their injuries are taking their grievances to court. In a lawsuit lodged with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, they say the program is unconstitutional, depriving them of their rights to due process and a jury trial.

Lawyers say the move could spur Congress and the Department of Health and Human Services to reform how they handle vaccine injuries, as well as push more of the individuals alleging injuries to not just sue the government, but the drugmakers that the program is meant to shield from litigation.

This is the first domino to fall, said David Carney, a Green & Schafle LLC attorney representing people injured by vaccines. Were going to start to see a windfall.

For years, attorneys and activists representing Americans injured by routine vaccinations have been pushing lawmakers to reform how the HHS reviews requests for compensation. They say that the process, dubbed the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, is in desperate need for more special masters to review the backlog of nearly 4,000 injury claims.

Congress, they add, needs to expedite the process for adding new vaccines to the program, though lawmakers have yet to pull the trigger on legislation thats been several years in the works.

Covid vaccine injuries are not among those currently under the VICP. Those are filed with the HHS Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.

Created in 2010 to pay out damages for people injured in sudden health crises like Ebola and the Anthrax scare, critics say the CICP program is slow moving, opaque, and poorly equipped for handling the nearly 11,000 claims alleging Covid-related injuries awaiting or in review as of Oct. 1. And with a little more than 1,000 decisions reached, vaccine attorneys dont expect the others to be resolved any time soon.

Vaccine law experts say the path forward is reforming the VICP and bringing Covid-19 immunization injuries under its umbrella. But doing so takes both the HHS and Congress, and attorneys say efforts from both appear lagging.

Adding a vaccine to the VICP is no small feat. The HHS first has to recommend a jab for routine administration to children, and then the agency has two years to recommend that it be covered by the VICP.

In the case for Covid vaccines, the HHS has already recommended jabs for routine administration to children. Through informal conversations with HHS employees, Carney said he and others in the vaccine law space were led to believe Covid vaccines were going to be moved over to the VICP, though the agency has yet to take any action to make that happen.

Now, people suffering injuries allegedly from Covid vaccines feel like the government is not acting in their best interest, and are hiring attorneys, he said.

The burden, however, doesnt entirely lie with the HHS. In order for the VICP to actually pay out for Covid injuries, Congress would have to sign off on taxing the doses for the program, a process that applies to any vaccine added to the program.

Over the past several years, lawmakers have put forth legislation to modernize the program. Earlier this year, Reps. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) and Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.) introduced bills that would move pending Covid-19 vaccine injury claims to the VICP, bring on more special masters to review cases, and eliminate the need for Congress to sign off on a tax for every vaccine added to the table.

In October, React19a group for people injured by Covid vaccines and a plaintiff in the lawsuitbriefed lawmakers about the need for changes.

Renee Gentry, director of George Washington University Law Schools Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic, presented alongside React19 and has been urging lawmakers for reforms for a decade.

When it comes to getting Congress on board, she said talking about vaccine on the Hill is a little bit like walking on the edge of a razorblade thats on fire.

Its a very, very subtle dance up there, she said, adding its nearly impossible to have a reasoned, calm, specific conversation about vaccines.

An HHS spokesperson likewise called out Congress for not fully funding the HHSs budget request for the CICP, though noted the agency has tried making meaningful CICP process improvement, such as bringing on more medical reviewers and improving communications with people requesting benefits from the program.

The spokesperson also said the Health Resources and Services Administration, the HHS entity that oversees the VICP and Countermeasures Program, is working to establish a table that would list and explain injuries that, based on the statutory compelling, reliable, valid, medical, and scientific evidence standard, are presumed to be caused by covered COVID-19 countermeasures.

Gentry, however, said theres a growing frustration with the CICPs handling of Covid claims, and that the program is not appropriate for anything on this scale.

In total, 12,233 Covid-19 claims have been filed with the CICP. More than 9,000 of those allege Covid-19 vaccines were involved in injuries or deaths. Thats the bulk of the 12,775 claims brought to the program over the past 13 years.

While only a small fraction of Countermeasure Programs Covid claims have been addressed, the overwhelming majority of those1,235have been denied. Most missed a filing deadline.

The program has deemed 32 claims eligible for compensation; only 6 have resulted in compensation, all of which involved Covid-19 vaccines.

An unsatisfactory remedy has now shown itself to be unsatisfactory, said Christina Ciampolillo, past president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association. Theres not a lot of promise that you can point to for changes to the CICP in the future.

Nevertheless, in May, the HHS extended liability protections under the CICP until the end of 2024. After that, Ciampolillo said, it becomes an open question as to whether Covid vaccine manufacturers would be open to lawsuits from people alleging injury.

Theres a deadline there, said Ciampolillo, an attorney at Conway Homer PC. Thats kind of the no mans land that everybody is wondering about.

The lawsuit against the HHS may serve as the catalyst for ushering in change.

If case does move forward, I would suspect HHS would work more closely in concert to finally get these important bills that will streamline compensation moving, said Brianne Dressen, co-chair of React19 who experienced blurred vision, severe paresthesia, and other afflictions after a shot of AstraZenecas Covid vaccine during a clinical trial.

However, should the case fail, Dressen said her group would continue to seek other avenues through the legal system, including other types of lawsuits and applying more pressure in the halls of Washington.

Likewise, vaccine injury attorneys said more lawsuits could follow.

Theres probably a large number of injured people, and the more negative outcomes that are realized through the CICP, I think youll have more frustrated individuals, Ciampolillo said.

The CICP essentially shields drugmakers from lawsuits. But Carney said that given theres not a sufficient legal forum to adjudicate Covid-19 injury claims and that the CICP isnt a suitable alternative to civil tort litigation, it is arguable that pharmaceutical companies could be next in line to be sued.

Very soon, were going to see people sue the vaccine manufacturers, Carney said.

Read the rest here:

Covid Vaccine Injury Suit May Fuel Federal Overhaul, Litigation - Bloomberg Law

Vaccination Coverage by Age 24 Months Among Children Born – CDC

November 6, 2023

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends vaccines against 15 potentially serious diseases by the age of 24 months.

What is added by this report?

Estimated coverage with most childhood vaccines was similar among children born during 20192020 compared with those born during 20172018, with only a few exceptions. Disparities in coverage by race and ethnicity, poverty status, insurance status, and urbanicity persist, with a widening of the gap among some subgroups evident over time.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Universal and equitable access to vaccination will require overcoming economic, logistic, and attitudinal obstacles to ensure that all children are protected from vaccine-preventable diseases.

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

National Immunization Survey-Child data collected in 2022 were combined with data from previous years to assemble birth cohorts and assess coverage with routine vaccines by age 24 months by birth cohort. Overall, vaccination coverage was similar among children born during 20192020 compared with children born during 20172018, except that coverage with both the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine and 1 dose of hepatitis A vaccine increased. Coverage was generally higher among non-Hispanic White (White) children (221 percentage points higher than coverage for non-Hispanic Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native [AI/AN] children), children living at or above poverty (3.522 percentage points higher than coverage for children living below the federal poverty level), privately insured children (2.438 percentage points higher than coverage for children with Medicaid, other insurance, or no insurance), and children in urban areas (316.5 percentage points higher than coverage for children living in rural areas). Coverage with the full series of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine was lower among AI/AN children compared with White children. Trends in vaccination coverage disparities across categories of race and ethnicity, health insurance status, poverty status, and urbanicity were evaluated for the 20162020 birth cohorts. Fewer than 5% of 168 trends examined were statistically significant, including six increases (widening of the coverage gap) and one decrease (narrowing of the gap). Analyses revealed a widening of the gap between children living at or above the poverty level (higher coverage) and those living below poverty (lower coverage), for several vaccines. Socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic disparities in vaccination coverage persist; addressing them is important to ensure protection for all children against vaccine-preventable disease.

The World Health Organization describes immunization as a global health and development success story, responsible for preventing 3.55 million deaths each year.* In the United States, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends vaccines against 15 potentially serious diseases by age 24 months (1). For nearly 30 years, the National Immunization Survey-Child (NIS-Child) has monitored coverage with ACIP-recommended childhood vaccines in the United States. National coverage estimates provide an overall picture of the strength of the U.S. immunization program and insight into coverage with new vaccines. Stratification by sociodemographic and geographic variables allows for identification of subpopulations at higher risk for disease because of lower vaccination coverage. NIS-Child data have been used previously to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage with childhood vaccinations (2). This assessment did not identify any consistent or persistent decline in vaccination coverage associated with the COVID-19 pandemic at the national level. Among certain subgroups, however, coverage was lower during the pandemic period. For example, coverage with the combined seven-vaccine series by age 24 months decreased 45 percentage points among children living below the federal poverty level or in rural areas.

NIS-Child uses random-digit-dialing to identify U.S. households that contain children aged 1935 months. A telephone survey is conducted with the parent or guardian who is most knowledgeable about the childs immunization history, and consent is requested to contact the childs vaccine providers. If consent is granted, a questionnaire is mailed to all the childs providers to obtain vaccination information, which is synthesized to create the childs comprehensive vaccination history. Children born during 20192020 were identified using data collected during 20202022. The household interview response rate** for 2022 was 25.1%, and 49.7% of children with completed parent or guardian interviews had adequate provider data, resulting in data from 27,733 children available for analysis.

All NIS-Child coverage estimates are based on information supplied by providers. Kaplan-Meier techniques were used to estimate vaccination coverage by age 24 months, except for the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) and rotavirus vaccine. Because of a change in ACIP recommendations and an extremely long period of eligibility for catch-up vaccination, coverage with 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) was estimated by age 35 months (the maximum age available) as well as by age 24 months.*** The significance of coverage differences was assessed using z-tests; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Vaccination coverage among children born during 20192020 was compared with that among children born during 20172018. Five-year trends in coverage and in socioeconomic and demographic disparities by year of birth were evaluated by fitting a linear regression model and testing for the significance of the slope (average annual percentage point change [AAPPC]). Analyses used weighted data and were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute) and SUDAAN software (version 11; RTI International). This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.

National vaccination coverage. Estimated coverage with most childhood vaccines was similar among children born during 20192020 and those born during 20172018, with the exception of a 3.3 percentage point increase in coverage with the HepB birth dose and a 1.5 percentage point increase in coverage with 1 dose of HepA (Table 1). The proportion of children completely unvaccinated by age 24 months remained at 1%. Coverage among children born during 20192020 exceeded 90% for 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine (93.0%), 3 doses of HepB (92.1%), 1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) (91.6%), and 1 dose of varicella vaccine (VAR) (91.1%). The lowest coverage estimates were observed for 2 doses of influenza vaccine (61.3%) and for the combined seven-vaccine series (69.1%).

Vaccination coverage by selected sociodemographic characteristics and geographic locations. Among children born during 20192020, coverage was higher among those who were privately insured compared with uninsured children and children insured by Medicaid or other insurance for all vaccines except the HepB birth dose, which did not differ between privately insured children and those who were insured by Medicaid (Table 2). Compared with children with private insurance (0.6% unvaccinated), a higher proportion of uninsured children (6.0%) and children on Medicaid (1.2%) received no vaccinations by age 24 months.

Numerous disparities in coverage by race and ethnicity were observed. Most notably, non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) children, Hispanic or Latino, and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) children all had lower coverage with 4 doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), 4 doses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), rotavirus vaccine, 2 doses of influenza vaccine, and the combined seven-vaccine series compared with non-Hispanic White (White) children. Coverage with the full series of Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib) was lower by 12.1 percentage points among AI/AN children compared with White children. (Supplementary Table 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134544). Children living below the federal poverty level had lower coverage than children living at or above the poverty level for all vaccines except the HepB birth dose. Compared with children living in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA)**** principal city, those residing in a non-MSA had lower coverage with approximately one half of the vaccines monitored by NIS-Child. Wide variation in coverage estimates was also observed by jurisdiction (Supplementary Table 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134545), especially for 2 doses of influenza vaccine, which ranged from 33.0% (Mississippi) to 85.9% (Connecticut).

Coverage by birth cohort during 20112020 was stable for a majority of vaccines, although a decrease of 5.1 percentage points was observed for 2 doses of influenza vaccine among children born in 2020 compared with those born in 2019 (Figure). Examination of trends in overall coverage for the five most recent birth cohorts (20162020) revealed increases for the HepB birth dose (1.7 percentage points per year), 1 dose of HepA (0.9 percentage points per year), and 2 doses of HepA (0.8 percentage points per year); no decreases were found (Supplementary Table 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134544).

Coverage was also estimated by the five most recent birth cohorts within each category of the sociodemographic variables (race and ethnicity, poverty level, health insurance status, and MSA status) (Supplementary Table 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134544). Positive linear trends were observed for the HepB birth dose for multiple subgroups of children, including non-Hispanic White and multiple race children, children living at or above the poverty level, privately insured and Medicaid-insured children, and those living in an MSA principal city or an MSA nonprincipal city. Increased coverage with 1 dose of HepA (White, any Medicaid insurance, and MSA nonprincipal city), 2 doses of HepA (White, at or above poverty level, private insurance only, and non-MSA), and rotavirus vaccine (Black) was observed over time. No decreases were seen for any of the combinations of vaccines and categories of sociodemographic variables.

In addition, trends in disparities were assessed for 20162020 birth cohorts (Supplementary Table 3, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134546). Among 168 trends evaluated, six increases (widening of the coverage gap between a variable category and the referent group) and one decrease (narrowing of the gap) were identified. The most common of these was the disparity in coverage by poverty status, with a widening of the gap in coverage with 2 HepA doses, 2 influenza vaccine doses, and the combined seven-vaccine series between children living below poverty and those living at or above poverty.

This report incorporates NIS-Child data collected in 2022 to assess vaccination coverage, disparities in vaccination coverage, and 5-year trends in coverage and disparities in coverage among children born during 20162020. For most recommended childhood vaccines, coverage has remained high and stable for a number of years. Among children born during 20192020, coverage exceeded 70% for all vaccines except 2 doses of influenza vaccine (61.3%) and the combined seven-vaccine series (69.1%). HepB birth dose coverage has been trending upward for several years, exceeding 80% for the first time in 2019. Coverage with 1 dose of HepA has increased more slowly, but if the current trend continues, coverage will exceed 90% among children born in 2022. Among children born during 20192020, Healthy People 2030 objectives have been met for coverage with 1 dose of MMR by age 24 months (90.8%) and for the proportion of children who receive no recommended vaccines by age 24 months (1.3%), but not for coverage with 4 DTaP doses (90.0%).

Disparities persist in vaccination coverage by race and ethnicity, poverty status, MSA status, and health insurance status and are often substantial. Lower coverage with the full series of Hib among AI/AN children compared with White children is particularly concerning given the sharply elevated incidence of Hib disease in the AI/AN population. The largest observed coverage disparities were for 2 doses of influenza; influenza vaccination coverage varied widely by jurisdiction as well, with a range of 52.9 percentage points across the United States. Analysis of 5-year trends revealed that only a small proportion of the disparities involving sociodemographic variables changed over time, although it appears that children living below the poverty level might be losing ground compared with children with higher family incomes. Disparities such as these have been documented previously (3,4). Concern over financial barriers to vaccination led to the creation of the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program,***** which covers the cost of recommended vaccines for eligible children. The program appeared successful in reducing racial and ethnic disparities in coverage (5), but additional efforts will be needed to close the remaining coverage gaps. CDC is currently working with partners, such as state Medicaid programs, the Indian Health Service, and the Association of Immunization Managers, to increase awareness of the VFC program (6).

Universal and equitable access to vaccination will require overcoming often interrelated economic, logistical, and attitudinal obstacles. Interviews with parents identified issues such as appointment scheduling challenges, incomplete knowledge of the schedule of recommended vaccines, limited availability and high cost of child care for other children in the household, and lack of transportation as factors that limit access to care (7). Strategies that have been found useful in addressing barriers to vaccination include identifying venues other than physician offices for the administration of vaccines (such as health departments, child care centers, and pharmacies), strong provider recommendations, reminder and recall interventions, standing orders, vaccination status review at every health care encounter, and expanded use of immunization information systems to provide consolidated immunization histories (8,9).

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, the low household interview response rate (21%25% over survey years 20182022) and the availability of adequate provider data for only 49%54% of those who completed interviews during these survey years creates the possibility of selection bias. Second, use of weighting to account for nonresponse and households without telephones might not have completely eliminated bias because of these factors. Finally, coverage estimates could be incorrect if some providers did not return vaccination history questionnaires or if administered vaccines were not documented accurately. Total survey error for the 2022 survey year data was assessed and demonstrated that coverage was underestimated by 1.7 percentage points for 1 dose of MMR, 3.3 percentage points for the HepB birth dose, and 9.2 percentage points for the combined seven-vaccine series (10). An analysis of change in bias of vaccination coverage estimates from 2021 to 2022 determined that a meaningful change in bias was unlikely.

Overall coverage with recommended childhood vaccinations remains high; however, persistent disparities in coverage among children in racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as those who are not privately insured, who live in rural areas, and who live below the poverty level must be addressed to ensure that all children are protected from vaccine-preventable diseases. Data from immunization information systems can be used to identify local areas and population subgroups with lower vaccination coverage; children in these groups might be more susceptible to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. More extensive use of the VFC program, interventions to improve vaccine confidence, enhanced flexibility in scheduling vaccination appointments, and expanded options for the place of vaccination will aid in making the U.S. immunization program more accessible and equitable for all (79).

1Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.

Abbreviations: DTaP=diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA=hepatitis A vaccine; HepB=hepatitis B vaccine; Hib=Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR=measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV=pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; VAR=varicella vaccine. * Includes vaccinations received by age 24 months, except for the HepB birth dose, rotavirus vaccination, and 2 HepA doses by age 35 months. For all vaccines except the HepB birth dose and rotavirus vaccination, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate vaccination coverage to account for children whose vaccination history was ascertained before age 24 months (35 months for 2 HepA doses). Data for the 2017 birth year are from survey years 2018, 2019, and 2020; data for the 2018 birth year are from survey years 2019, 2020, and 2021; data for 2019 birth year are from survey years 2020, 2021, and 2022; data for the 2020 birth year are considered preliminary and are from survey years 2021 and 2022 (data from survey year 2023 are not yet available). Includes children who might have been vaccinated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine or diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. Healthy People 2030 target for 4 doses of DTaP by age 2 years is 90%. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/vaccination Includes children who might have been vaccinated with MMR and varicella combination vaccine. Healthy People 2030 target for 1 dose of MMR by age 2 years is 90.8%. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/vaccination ** Hib primary series: receipt of 2 or 3 doses, depending on product type received; full series: primary series and booster dose, which includes receipt of 3 or 4 doses, depending on product type received. One dose HepB administered from birth through age 3 days. Statistically significantly different (p<0.05) from zero. Before 2020, the first Hep A dose was recommended at age 1223 months, with the second dose given 618 months after the first, depending upon the product type received. In 2020, recommendation revised to 2 doses between ages 12 and 23 months, 6 months apart. Because children in this analysis were vaccinated under both recommendations, coverage estimates for both 24 months and 35 months are provided. *** Includes 2 doses of Rotarix monovalent rotavirus vaccine or 3 doses of RotaTeq pentavalent rotavirus vaccine; if any dose in the series is either RotaTeq or unknown, the default is to a 3-dose series. The maximum age for the final rotavirus dose is 8 months, 0 days. Influenza vaccine doses must be 24 days apart (4 weeks with a 4-day grace period); doses could have been received during two influenza seasons. The combined seven-vaccine series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4) includes 4 doses of DTaP, 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, the full series of Hib (3 or 4 doses, depending on product type), 3 doses of HepB, 1 dose of VAR, and 4 doses of PCV. Healthy People 2030 target for children who get no recommended vaccines by age 2 years is 1.3%. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/vaccination

Abbreviations: DTaP=diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA=hepatitis A vaccine; HepB=hepatitis B vaccine; Hib=Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR=measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV=pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; Ref = referent group; VAR=varicella vaccine. * Includes vaccinations received by age 24 months, except for the HepB birth dose, rotavirus vaccination, and 2 HepA doses by age 35 months. For all vaccines except the HepB birth dose and rotavirus vaccination, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate vaccination coverage to account for children whose vaccination history was ascertained before age 24 months (35 months for 2 HepA doses). Data for the 2019 birth year are from survey years 2020, 2021, and 2022; data for the 2020 birth year are considered preliminary and are from survey years 2021 and 2022 (data from survey year 2023 are not yet available). Childrens health insurance status was reported by parent or guardian. Other insurance includes the Childrens Health Insurance Program, military insurance, coverage through the Indian Health Service, and any other type of health insurance not mentioned elsewhere. Includes children who might have been vaccinated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine or diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. ** Statistically significant (p<0.05) difference compared with the Ref. Includes children who might have been vaccinated with MMR and VAR combination vaccine. Hib primary series: receipt of 2 or 3 doses, depending on product type received; full series: primary series and booster dose, which includes receipt of 3 or 4 doses, depending on product type received. One dose HepB administered from birth through age 3 days. *** Before 2020, the first Hep A dose was recommended at age 1223 months, with the second dose given 618 months after the first, depending upon the product type received. In 2020, recommendation was revised to 2 doses between ages 12 and 23 months, 6 months apart. Because children in this analysis were vaccinated under both recommendations, coverage estimates for both 24 months and 35 months are provided. Estimate was not available because the unweighted sample size for the denominator was <30, 95% CI half width divided by the estimate was >0.588, or 95% CI half-width was 10. Includes 2 doses of Rotarix monovalent rotavirus vaccine or 3 doses of RotaTeq pentavalent rotavirus vaccine; if any dose in the series is either RotaTeq or unknown, the default is to a 3-dose series. The maximum age for the final rotavirus dose is 8 months, 0 days. Influenza vaccine doses must be 24 days apart (4 weeks with a 4-day grace period); doses could have been received during two influenza seasons. **** The combined seven-vaccine series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4) includes 4 doses of DTaP, 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, the full series of Hib (3 or 4 doses, depending on product type), 3 doses of HepB, 1 dose of VAR, and 4 doses of PCV.

Abbreviations: DTaP = diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine; HepA = hepatitis A vaccine; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; Hib = Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; PCV = pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; VAR = varicella vaccine.

* Includes vaccinations received by age 24 months, except for the HepB birth dose, rotavirus vaccination, and 2 HepA doses by 35 months. For all vaccines except the HepB birth dose and rotavirus vaccination, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate vaccination coverage to account for children whose vaccination history was ascertained before age 24 months (35 months for 2 HepA doses).

Includes children who might have been vaccinated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids vaccine or diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine.

Includes children who might have been vaccinated with MMR and varicella combination vaccine.

Hib full series: primary series and booster dose, which includes receipt of 3 or 4 doses, depending on product type received.

** One dose HepB administered from birth through age 3 days.

Includes 2 doses of Rotarix monovalent rotavirus vaccine or 3 doses of RotaTeq pentavalent rotavirus vaccine; if any dose in the series is either RotaTeq or unknown, the default is to a 3-dose series. The maximum age for the final rotavirus dose is 8 months, 0 days.

Influenza vaccine doses must be 24 days apart (4 weeks with a 4-day grace period); doses could have been received during two influenza seasons.

The combined seven-vaccine series (4:3:1:3*:3:1:4) includes 4 doses of DTaP, 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine, 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, the full series of Hib (3 or 4 doses, depending on product type), 3 doses of HepB, 1 dose of VAR, and 4 doses of PCV.

*** Children born in 2011 are included in survey years 2012, 2013, and 2014; children born in 2012 are included in survey years 2013, 2014, and 2015; children born in 2013 are included in survey years 2014, 2015, and 2016, children born in 2014 are included in survey years 2015, 2016, and 2017; children born in 2015 are included in survey years 2016, 2017, and 2018; children born in 2016 are included in survey years 2017, 2018, and 2019; children born in 2017 are included in survey years 2018, 2019 and 2020; children born in 2018 are included in survey years 2019 and 2020, and 2021; children born in 2019 are included in survey years 2020, 2021, and 2022; data for children born in 2020 are considered preliminary and are from survey years 2021 and 2022 (data from survey year 2023 are not yet available).

Suggested citation for this article: Hill HA, Yankey D, Elam-Evans LD, Chen M, Singleton JA. Vaccination Coverage by Age 24 Months Among Children Born in 2019 and 2020 National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 20202022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:11901196. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7244a3.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Visit link:

Vaccination Coverage by Age 24 Months Among Children Born - CDC

Page 148«..1020..147148149150..160170..»