Category: Vaccine

Page 147«..1020..146147148149..160170..»

N.B. changes definition of ‘serious’ COVID-19 vaccine reactions, cuts number in half – CBC.ca

November 13, 2023

New Brunswick

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share by Email

Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon - CBC News

Posted: November 10, 2023

New Brunswick has changed how it defines "serious" reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and using thisnew definition, the number has been cut in half.

There have been154 serious adverse events following immunization reported over a 32-month period ending this past summer, according toDepartment of Health spokesperson Sean Hatchard.

That's one serious incident for every 13,550 COVID-19 vaccinations administeredin New Brunswick between Dec. 14, 2020, and Aug. 26, 2023a significant improvement over previous reports.

The province had been reporting 313 "serious and medically important" reactions before the definition of what constitutes a seriousreaction was changed.

New Brunswick adopted the definition of a serious adverse event used by the Public Health Agency of Canada in February, Hatchard confirmed. "This was done to align with the national definition which allows for more effective comparisons of data with other Canadian jurisdictions," he said.

"As part of this process, the Department of Health reviewed all reported [adverse events following immunization]and reclassified them to match the national definition."

As a result, some "medically important events" have been reclassified as "non-serious" andremoved from thetotal.

The Public Health Agency of Canada defines adverse events following immunization as "any untoward medical occurrence that follows and isn't necessarily causally related to the usage of the vaccine." The adverse event may be "any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom, or disease."

An event is considered seriousif it "results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect."

New Brunswick previously combined "serious" and "medically important" adverse eventsin the same category to be "hypervigilant," said Hatchard.

"The COVID-19 vaccines were new and we wanted to ensure we monitored extremely closely," he said.These were sent to the agency "for its support in classification and/or further expert follow-up."

Now, amedically important event can be classified as serious or non-serious.

According to the Public Health Agency, a non-serious medically important event may not be immediately life-threatening but requires intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in the definition of a serious adverse event.

As an example, Hatchard cited aneurological event, with the main reaction being Bell's palsy.

"The case was never hospitalized or had any criteria to meet the definition of a serious [adverse eventfollowing immunization] and was managed by a physician to prevent any of the outcomes listed in the definition" of a serious event. That event does not meet the definition, he said, "while it is considered medically important."

Between December 2020 and this past August, New Brunswick residents received nearly 2.1 million vaccines.According to the province's revised figures, there were 1,170 adverse reactions reported about one following every 1,800 shots, but most of those have been classified as non-serious.

Of the 154 serious reactions, Hatchard did not provide any breakdowns of thetypes of reactions, types of vaccines or age groups.

The Department of Health has not received any reports of adverse events following immunization with the updated COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccines, available in the province since Oct. 4, said Hatchard.

As of Oct. 30, 2023, there were 31,174 doses of the Moderna Spikevaxadministered and 10,073 doses of the Pfizer Comirnaty, he said.

This isn't the first time New Brunswick has changed COVID-related definitions.

As ofSeptember, only people with confirmedCOVID who die in hospital are counted as COVID deaths, and the pandemic death toll was revised at least twice last year after the departmentbegan defining COVID-relateddeaths as those where the virus was either the primary cause of death or a directlycontributing factor.

The province also reverted in September to counting COVIDhospitalizations as patients hospitalized both for and with the virus. SinceApril 2022, the province has been counting only people who were hospitalized because of the virus. People whowere initially admitted to hospital for another reason and later tested positive for COVIDwere no longer included.

The Public Health Agency"is clear that evidence indicates the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines continue to outweigh the risks of contracting the disease," Hatchard said in an emailed statement.

He noted that vaccine providers are legally required to report any adverse events in New Brunswick under the Public Health Act, and immunization data is "regularly monitored to ensure that any unusual safety trends would be identified quickly.

Federal health officials also review data from provinces and territories across the country to identify any new or emerging trends, he added.

Read the original:

N.B. changes definition of 'serious' COVID-19 vaccine reactions, cuts number in half - CBC.ca

B.C. Tories call for top doctors job over continued vaccine mandates for health-care workers – Global News

November 13, 2023

The Conservative Party of BC is calling on the New Democrat-led government to fire Dr. Bonnie Henry over a continued requirement that health-care workers in the province be vaccinated against COVID-19.

In the legislature this week, Abbotsford Souths Bruce Banman one of only two Conservative MLAs accused the extreme leftist NDP government and its unelected bureaucrats of failing British Columbians with its mandate in the midst of a health-care crisis. He and party leader John Rustad, who represents Nechako Lakes, doubled down on their call on Thursday.

2:48 BC Greens remove deputy leader Dr. Sanjiv Gandhi for inappropriate tweet

British Columbia is one of very few jurisdictions in the world that refuses to hire back unvaccinated health-care workers, Banman posted on X.

Story continues below advertisement

We need these people in the system. Weve got ERs that are shutting down, hospitals that are a mess I think it is incompetent not to hire these people back and put them to work.

The calls came just before the deputy leader of the BC Greens, Dr. Sanjiv Gandhi, stepped down for liking a post on X that compared Henry, the provincial health officer, to Josef Mengele, the infamous Nazi doctor who experimented on concentration camp victims during the Second World War. Gandhi has since said that the like was accidental.

In mid-September, an individual I follow on X (formerly Twitter) posted a letter and comments, including an impassioned critique of healthcare delivery in BC. Intending to like that post, I inadvertently liked the post of a third party whom I do not follow, quoting the original tweet, he posted to X on Thursday.

Story continues below advertisement

I did not realizing my error until yesterday as the subject of considerable racism in my own life, I know that words do matter.

Gandhi apologized for the harm he caused.

2:05 Critics call for simpler vaccine rollout in B.C.

Trending Now

While the Tories have opposed the vaccine mandate for health-care workers, the Greens have questioned Henrys decision to lift a number of public health restrictions and questioned transparency around the process.

Health Minister Adrian Dix is defending Henry, citing a tendency among the Conservatives and Green party to launch a personal attack against the doctor, which is unacceptable.

Ninety-nine per cent of health-care workers were vaccinated when we brought the order in, he said Thursday. Dr. Henry is an outstanding scientist, an outstanding leader. B.C. led Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic, led North America.

Story continues below advertisement

While Bonnie Henry isnt responsible for all of that, she was a very important and courageous public health leader through all those times, and she was and I think she has my 100 per cent support and shell continue to.

2:05 Health-care professionals react to return of mandatory mask policy

The provinces Bill 36, passed in November last year, gave the health minister the authority to require vaccination against specified transmissible illnesses for health-care workers, and the boards of medical colleges to create bylaws to that effect.

The Health Professions and Occupations Act also ushered in sweeping changes to the oversight and regulation of health workers in the province, merging 15 health profession regulatory colleges into six and eliminating elected positions on college boards. It outlined discrimination as a form of professional misconduct, required anti-discrimination measures to be embedded in health-care delivery, separated investigations under the complains and adjudications process, and more.

Story continues below advertisement

Effective Oct. 3, health-care workers in most settings were also required to wear face masks as a temporary public health measure during respiratory season.

2023 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Excerpt from:

B.C. Tories call for top doctors job over continued vaccine mandates for health-care workers - Global News

We have vaccinated over 3.9m girls with HPV vaccine NPHCDA – Vanguard

November 13, 2023

By Sola Ogundipe

Over 3.9 million girls aged between 9 and 14 years in Nigeria have been vaccinated with the Human Papilloma Virus, HPV, vaccine against cervical cancer since the rollout of the vaccination exercise by the Federal government in October.

The Federal government recently introduced the HPV vaccine into its routine immunisation system, aiming to reach 7.7 million girls in the targeted age group with a single dose of the vaccine.

Disclosing this during a virtual discourse themed Cervical Cancer and HPV vaccination: Matters Arising , the Ag. Director of Disease Control and Immunisation, National Primary Healthcare Development Agency, NPHCDA, Dr. Garba Rufai, said no serious adverse events had been recorded among those vaccinated.

Rufai, who represented the Executive Director/ CEO of the NPHCDA, Dr Muyi Aina, in his presentation entitled, The Role of the NPHCDA in Mitigating the Challenges and Bottlenecks around Vaccines and Mass Vaccination Programmes in Nigeria, said the vaccines were being well received despite concerns raised in certain quarters.

We have been able to start in 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory, FCT and we still have three states that we are yet to commence. In some of these states, they are almost running out of vaccines, because they are being accepted in huge numbers.

From these 12 states, we have almost vaccinated four million young girls, we are around 3.9 million plus and by the end of today (Friday), we might be crossing the four million mark. By the time Kano state starts, we would close out close to five million.

In all of these numbers, we have not seen one serious Adverse Event Following Immunisation, AEFI, not one. It is remarkable being able to put about four million needles into people and none of the side effects, not even the early ones that we normally see have not happened.

Rufai who said there were initial gaps in information communication about the vaccine, however, affirmed that the government was up to the task of ensuring that the exercise was successful.

Introducing a vaccine is a process, there are activities lined up. We are building capacity and reminding ourselves about what vaccines are what they do and their possible adverse side effects, so vaccine safety monitoring by the NPHCDA and NAFDAC is ongoing.

It is a country introduction, and there is a monitoring and surveillance system in place not just for the HPV but for polio, measles, and the pentavalent vaccines, he stated.

A Consultant Obstetrician and Gynecologist at the College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Prof Rose Anorlu, said that the purpose of the vaccination was to prevent and

In her presentation Cervical Cancer: The Right Communication for Prevention, she emphasised that cervical cancer screening has been shown to reduce the rate of the disease.

Anorlu, who heads the Oncology & Pathological Studies, at Lagos University Teaching Hospital, argued that cervical cancer is the fourth most prevalent cancer globally, even as she stressed that the HPV vaccine was the primary prevention for the disease.

Mathematical model shows that the vaccine can last up to 20 years without a booster dose. A single dose is equally as effective as two or three doses, but it is not yet known if the vaccine can give lifetime protection.

Awareness of a disease is key in the prevention. It is right to say cervical cancer screening than screening for cervical cancer. They do not mean the same thing. Cervical cancer screening is to detect the pre-cancer of the cervix.

Screening is not for detection of invasive cervical cancer, it is for the detection of the pre-cancer of the

Read more:

We have vaccinated over 3.9m girls with HPV vaccine NPHCDA - Vanguard

Tuberculosis Remains One of Worlds Deadliest Diseases, but Vaccine Hopes Rise – Voice of America – VOA News

November 11, 2023

November 11, 2023 1:51 AM

Global cases of tuberculosis continued to rise last year, as disruption to health services caused by the COVID-19 pandemic set back efforts to fight the disease, according to the latest annual report from the World Health Organization. Henry Ridgwell reports.

More here:

Tuberculosis Remains One of Worlds Deadliest Diseases, but Vaccine Hopes Rise - Voice of America - VOA News

Health chiefs urge those eligible to get flu jab before season gets into full swing – Nation.Cymru

November 11, 2023

A patient receiving their flu vaccination

Public Health officials are urging those eligible to get their flu vaccine before the worst of the winter flu season begins.

To maximize their protection against flu, people need to get vaccinated a few weeks before the flu season starts usually it begins around early December.

Vaccination will help to protect them from getting seriously ill before Christmas and the New Year when flu cases are expected to peak.

Over half a million people have already been vaccinated for flu in Wales so far this year.

People who are eligible are urged to come forward for their winter vaccines as soon as possible.

Parents of 2 and 3 year olds are particularly encouraged to make an appointment with their GP to get their child vaccinated.

Young children can spread flu easily to more vulnerable members of their family and community.

They can also suffer unpleasant symptoms themselves and if they catch the flu it can lead to secondary infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia.

Most children have the vaccine as a quick and painless nasal spray, which is highly effective at protecting against the virus. Flu vaccines are very safe and simple to give to children.

There is still a concern that children who didnt encounter the flu virus between 2020-2022, when there was less social mixing, could be particularly vulnerable.

Those who are under 65 years old and in a clinical risk group (for example; those who are diabetic, have a heart problem, liver disease or respiratory problems) are also urged to come forward for their flu vaccine.

Flu and COVID-19 are both respiratory illnesses that thrive in winter. Getting vaccinated remains our best line of defence against serious disease.

The COVID-19 autumn booster programme is also live. Everyone over 65 years old are among those being offered a COVID-19 booster to reduce their chances of getting seriously ill with the virus. More information on how to get the vaccines is available from your local health board.

With added winter pressures on the NHS, it is more important than ever that those who are eligible for a free flu or COVID-19 vaccine get vaccinated to help prevent them becoming seriously unwell and protect the NHS this winter.

Vulnerable

Dr Christopher Johnson, Consultant Epidemiologist and Head of Public Health Wales Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme said: Flu can be serious. The very young, those with a health condition and the very old are particularly vulnerable. As the weather gets colder, viruses like flu are more easily spread. No-one wants to be ill over Christmas and New Year so it really is worth getting your vaccine.

Any side effects from the vaccinations are normally mild and dont last long. The chances of becoming seriously ill with flu or COVID-19 are greatly reduced by vaccination, as are the risks of spreading these viruses. Vaccination really is the best way to protect ourselves and others this winter from serious illness.

Vaccination is particularly important for those who are older, pregnant, or have a health condition and are more vulnerable to complications as a result of the infections.

It is also very important that frontline healthcare workers and those who work in care homes or providing care in peoples own homes get their vaccines to help reduce spread.

For more information about who is eligible and how to get the vaccines, please visit: Flu vaccine and COVID-19 Autumn Booster Public Health Wales (nhs.wales)

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Read the original post:

Health chiefs urge those eligible to get flu jab before season gets into full swing - Nation.Cymru

Impact of vaccination against severe COVID-19 in the French population aged 50 years and above: a retrospective … – BMC Medicine

November 11, 2023

Study design

We conducted a retrospective ecological study based on French national surveillance data (see Data sources), from December 28, 2020 (week 532020 start of the vaccination campaign) to March 6, 2022 (week 92022 end of Omicron BA.1 wave). The study population was the French population aged 50years and above, stratified into four age groups: 5059, 6069, 7079 and 80years old and above. We estimated the impact of the first and second doses of primary vaccination and the first booster, in terms of the number of averted hospitalizations (admissions to all types of hospitalization services), ICU admissions and deaths.

To compute the number of averted events, we used a method initially developed for tuberculosis [13], which was later applied to influenza [14, 15] and more recently to COVID-19 [6, 7]. Details are given in Additional file 1: Text S1. Basically, the number of averted events (({N}_{mathrm{averted}})) can be estimated from the number of observed events (({N}_{mathrm{observed}})), vaccine coverage ((VC)) and vaccine effectiveness ((VE)), as follows:

$${N}_{mathrm{averted}}= {N}_{mathrm{observed}} times frac{VCtimes VE}{1 - (VC times VE)}$$

(1)

where the term (VCtimes VE) represents the proportion of the population that is protected by vaccination. This method only accounts for the direct effects of vaccination on severe outcomes (not its indirect effects such as impact on transmission) and therefore provides a lower bound estimate of the true number of averted events. Besides, in a scenario without vaccination, it is probable that additional control measures would have been implemented, which we do not account for here (i.e. we estimate the impact of vaccination under the assumption that the same NPIs would have been implemented over the study period). These two points will be further addressed in the discussion.

This formula can be extended to account for the week of observation ((w)) and the number of doses received ((k), ranging from one to three (two doses and one booster)) [6, 15]:

$${{N}_{mathrm{averted}}}_{w}= {{N}_{mathrm{observed}}}_{w} times frac{sum_{k=1}^{3}{VC}_{w,k} times {VE}_{k}}{1 - (sum_{k=1}^{3}{VC}_{w,k} times {VE}_{k})}$$

(2)

where ({VC}_{k}) represents the vaccine coverage of exactly (k) doses (not at least (k) doses).

This formula assumes that VE is the same for all vaccinated individuals, regardless of the time elapsed since vaccination. However, VE is not constant over time: it quickly increases in the first weeks following vaccination due to the build-up of immunity and declines over time due to waning immunity [16,17,18,19]. In order to account for the evolution of VE according to the time elapsed since vaccination (left(Delta right)) in weeks, we modified the formula as follows:

$${{N}_{mathrm{averted}}}_{w}= {{N}_{mathrm{observed}}}_{w} times frac{sum_{k=1}^{3}sum_{Delta =0}^{w-1}{VP}_{w,k,Delta } times {VE}_{k, Delta }}{1 - (sum_{k=1}^{3}sum_{Delta =0}^{w-1}{{VP}_{w,k, Delta } times VE}_{k, Delta } )}$$

(3)

where ({VE}_{k, Delta }) is the vaccine effectiveness of the (k)th dose (Delta) weeks after vaccination, and ({VP}_{w,k,Delta }) represents the proportion of people who received their last dose (k)exactly (Delta) weeks before the week of observation (w). Of note, the sum of ({VP}_{w,k,Delta }) over all (Delta) corresponds to the vaccine coverage of exactly (k) doses on week (w) ((sum_{Delta =0}^{w-1}{VP}_{w,k,Delta }={VC}_{w,k})).

This formula was applied separately for each age group and each variant, in order to account for different VE according to age groups and variants. The total number of events directly averted by vaccination (number of hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths) was then obtained by summing the number of averted events over all weeks, age groups and variants. All analyses were conducted in R software version 4.1.2 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

For the number of observed events, we relied on hospitalization and death data from the SI-VIC database, maintained by the ANS (Agence du Numrique en Sant) and sent daily to Sant publique France, the French national public health agency. This database provides real-time data on patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in French public and private hospitals, including their age, date of hospitalization, type of hospitalization services and outcome (discharged/deceased). All COVID-19 cases are either biologically confirmed or present with a computed tomographic image highly suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection. For hospitalizations, we included patients hospitalized in all types of services (general wards, ICU, long-term care and rehabilitation, emergency care) and excluded patients hospitalized for reasons not linked to a COVID-19 infection. For deaths, we included all patients deceased in the hospitals with a COVID-19 infection and added individuals deceased in nursing homes (resident homes for elderly) with a COVID-19 infection from the SurvESMS database. The SurvESMS database, administered by Sant publique France, was designed for the monitoring of COVID-19 cases and deaths among the residents of nursing homes; it allows the distinction between residents who died in nursing homes from those who died in hospitals (already accounted for in the SI-VIC database). In the absence of data on age, individuals were considered 80+years old; this assumption was based on 2019 data which showed that the mean age of people deceased in nursing homes was 89years old [20]. Deaths at home could not be accounted for. The time series of hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths according to each variant were reconstructed using the SI-DEP database, the national surveillance system describing SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antigen test results arising from all private and public French laboratories (see details in Additional file 1: Text S2). The three databases (SI-VIC, SurvESMS and SI-DEP) are intended to be exhaustive.

Regarding vaccine coverage, we used the VAC-SI database, the national information system developed by the French Health Insurance to monitor the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, since the start of vaccine distribution in December 2020, across the country. Individual data include the number of doses, the date of vaccination, the type of vaccine, and socio-demographic information such as age. All types of vaccine were considered (Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273, Oxford/AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S and Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S). For each week of observation (w) and each age group, the number of vaccinated individuals according to the number of doses received before the week of observation (w) and to the week of vaccination (in order to compute the time elapsed since vaccination, (Delta)) were extracted. For each individual, on a given week of observation (w), only the last dose received before that week was taken into account, to avoid counting the same person twice: e.g. when an individual received a second dose on week (w), they were no longer counted among the first-dose individuals from week (w) onwards (they were only counted among the first-dose individuals up to week (w-1)). We excluded individuals for which the date of the first dose was posterior to the date of the second dose or the booster dose, or the date of the second dose was posterior to the date of the booster. For the denominator (number of individuals per age group in the French population), we used 2022 demographic data from the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE).

With regards to the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19 variants, we extracted data from a recent VE study conducted by Sant publique France [12]. The study investigated VE of the two mRNA vaccines Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 against Alpha (unpublished data), Delta and Omicron BA.1 severe outcomes (general ward hospitalizations and ICU/deaths) among immunocompetents50years old French individuals, between January 11, 2021, and February 10, 2022. Analyses were performed according to 5079 and 80years old and above age groups, and the number of vaccine doses (one dose, two doses and the first booster dose). VE according to time since vaccination were also estimated. These estimates were smoothed to remove random fluctuations over time.

Note that VE against Omicron severe outcomes were sourced from multiple studies available in the literature: the aforementioned French study for VE of the first dose against ICU/deaths [12], a test-negative casecontrol study in England for VE against hospitalizations among people aged 65years and older (which we applied to our 50+population) [21], and a test-negative casecontrol study in Canada for VE of the second dose and booster against deaths among people aged 18years and older (which we applied to our 50+population) [16].

In these three studies, the date associated to an individual is the date of the test or the date of symptom onset. In order to account for the time between the test or symptom onset and the event of interest (hospitalization, ICU admission or death), we applied a lag of 1week to VE against hospitalization and ICU admission and a lag of two weeks to VE against death. Finally, a linear decay of VE was assumed to account for the waning of immunity at longer time horizons. The decay values were extracted from the literature and set to0.5 points/week for the second dose after 21weeks [22, 23] and0.4 points/week for the booster dose after 21weeks [24]. In the absence of data from the literature for the first dose, we applied a coefficient twice higher than for the second dose (1 point/week). This coefficient was applied from the 13th week after vaccination [25]. In order to estimate uncertainty around the number of averted events, we used the 95% confidence intervals of VE estimates published in the three aforementioned studies [12, 16, 21].

Go here to see the original:

Impact of vaccination against severe COVID-19 in the French population aged 50 years and above: a retrospective ... - BMC Medicine

FDA Approves First Vaccine to Prevent Disease Caused by … – FDA.gov

November 11, 2023

For Immediate Release: November 09, 2023

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Ixchiq, the first chikungunya vaccine. Ixchiq is approved for individuals 18 years of age and older who are at increased risk of exposure to chikungunya virus.

The chikungunya virus is primarily transmitted to people through the bite of an infected mosquito. Chikungunya is an emerging global health threat with at least 5 million cases of chikungunya virus infection reported during the past 15 years. The highest risk of infection is in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Southeast Asia, and parts of the Americas where chikungunya virus-carrying mosquitos are endemic. However, chikungunya virus has spread to new geographical areas causing a rise in global prevalence of the disease.

The most common symptoms of chikungunya include fever and joint pain. Other symptoms may include a rash, headache, and muscle pain. Some individuals may experience debilitating joint pain that persists for months or even years. Treatment includes rest, fluids, and over-the-counter medications for pain and fever.

Infection with chikungunya virus can lead to severe disease and prolonged health problems, particularly for older adults and individuals with underlying medical conditions, said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDAs Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Todays approval addresses an unmet medical need and is an important advancement in the prevention of a potentially debilitating disease with limited treatment options.

Ixchiq is administered as a single dose by injection into the muscle. It contains a live, weakened version of the chikungunya virus and may cause symptoms in the vaccine recipient similar to those experienced by people who have chikungunya disease.

The safety of Ixchiq was evaluated in two clinical studies conducted in North America in which about 3,500 participants 18 years of age and older received a dose of the vaccine with one study including about 1,000 participants who received a placebo. The most commonly reported side effects by vaccine recipients were headache, fatigue, muscle pain, joint pain, fever, nausea and tenderness at the injection site.

In addition, although not commonly reported, severe chikungunya-like adverse reactions that prevented daily activity and/or required medical intervention occurred in 1.6% of Ixchiq recipients and none of the placebo recipients. Two recipients with severe chikungunya-like adverse reactions were hospitalized. In addition, some recipients had prolonged chikungunya-like adverse reactions that lasted for at least 30 days. The Prescribing Information includes a warning to inform that the vaccine may cause severe or prolonged chikungunya-like adverse reactions.

The FDA is requiring the company to conduct a postmarketing study to assess the serious risk of severe chikungunya-like adverse reactions following administration of Ixchiq.

Transmission of chikungunya virus to newborn babies from pregnant individuals with viremia (virus present in the blood) at delivery has been reported and can cause severe, potentially fatal chikungunya virus disease in newborns. In one study that evaluated whether the vaccine virus was present in the blood after vaccination, most individuals had vaccine virus detected in the blood within the first week following vaccination; the vaccine virus was not detected 14 days after vaccination. The Prescribing Information includes a warning to inform that it is not known if the vaccine virus can be transmitted from pregnant individuals to newborns, nor is it known if the vaccine virus can cause any adverse effects in the newborn. The warning also conveys that when considering administration to pregnant individuals, healthcare providers should take into consideration the individuals risk of exposure to chikungunya virus, gestational age and risks to the fetus or neonate from disease caused by chikungunya virus in the pregnant individual.

The effectiveness of Ixchiq is based on immune response data from a clinical study conducted in the United States in individuals 18 years of age and older. In this study, the immune response of 266 participants who received the vaccine was compared to the immune response of 96 participants who received placebo. The level of antibody evaluated in study participants was based on a level shown to be protective in non-human primates that had received blood from people who had been vaccinated. Almost all vaccine study participants achieved this antibody level.

Ixchiq was approved using the Accelerated Approval pathway. Accelerated approval allows the FDA to approve certain products for serious or life-threatening conditions based on evidence of a products effectiveness that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. In the FDAs evaluation of Ixchiq for accelerated approval, evidence of effectiveness is based on immune response data in clinical trial participants. As a condition for approval for Ixchiq, the FDA is requiring confirmatory clinical studies to be conducted to verify clinical benefit.

Ixchiq was granted Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy designations and the application was granted Priority Review. In addition, the FDA awarded the manufacturer of Ixchiq a tropical disease priority review voucher, under a provision included in the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. This provision aims to encourage the development of new drugs and biological products for the prevention and treatment of certain tropical diseases.

The FDA granted approval of Ixchiq to Valneva Austria GmbH.

###

Boilerplate

The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nations food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, radiation-emitting electronic products, and for regulating tobacco products.

Follow this link:

FDA Approves First Vaccine to Prevent Disease Caused by ... - FDA.gov

Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory … – CDC

November 11, 2023

TBE Virus and Its Subtypes

TBE virus is a single-stranded RNA virus in the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae (4). TBE virus is closely related to Powassan virus, a tickborne flavivirus transmitted in parts of the United States (5). The three main antigenic subtypes of TBE virus (i.e., European, Siberian, and Far Eastern) differ in the severity of disease they cause and geographic distribution (6). The principal geographic distribution of the European subtype virus is in parts of western and northern Europe through to the eastern European countries; the Siberian subtype virus is in Siberia and the Ural and European parts of Russia; and the Far Eastern subtype virus is in Japan, China, Mongolia, and the eastern parts of Russia; however, subtype virus distributions overlap substantially (69). Genomic studies have indicated two additional minor subtype viruses (i.e., Baikalian and Himalayan) (10,11).

TBE virus is primarily transmitted to humans by the bites of infected Ixodes sp. ticks but can also be acquired less frequently by alimentary transmission. Other rare modes of transmission include through breastfeeding, blood transfusion, solid organ transplantation, and slaughtering of viremic animals. Nymphs and adult ticks are believed to be responsible for causing most human infections. Approximately 60%70% of persons with TBE recall a bite (1219). Because TBE virus is present in the saliva of an infected tick, transmission likely occurs early during feeding (1,20).

Ixodes ricinus is the main vector for the European subtype TBE virus and Ixodes persulcatus for the Siberian and Far Eastern subtype viruses (21). I. ricinus is found in most of continental Europe and the United Kingdom and I. persulcatus in an area extending east from northeastern Europe through to China and Japan (22,23). The distributions of the two species overlap in certain countries, including Estonia, Finland, Latvia, and the European part of Russia (7,21,2327).

The preferred habitats for the vector ticks are woodland environments. The main habitats are deciduous forests for I. ricinus and coniferous forests for I. persulcatus (23,28). Ticks can be found either within the forest or on forest edges, where the forest transitions to grasslands, meadows, or marshlands, and they favor areas with low-growing dense brush and plant litter (23,2932). Recreational activities with increased risk for exposure to ticks include hiking, camping, cycling in woodland areas, hunting, fishing, birdwatching, and collecting mushrooms or berries (3336). Persons in certain occupations (e.g., farmers, forestry workers, military personnel, and researchers undertaking field work in rural areas) also might be at higher risk for exposure to infected ticks (17,37,38). Humans must enter a tick habitat to be at risk for infection because ticks do not, unaided, disperse widely (39,40). TBE virus infections acquired in urban areas (e.g., city parks) are occasionally reported; however, risk in urban areas is considered to be low (38,41,42).

The enzootic transmission cycle of TBE virus involves ticks and vertebrate hosts. Ticks are both virus vectors and reservoirs. A tick can become infected when feeding on a viremic host or through nonviremic transmission when co-feeding in close proximity to an infected tick (4345). After becoming infected, ticks remain infected through their various life stages and can transmit the virus sexually to other ticks and transovarially to their offspring (28,46,47). The main amplifying reservoir hosts are small mammals, particularly rodents (e.g., mice and voles). Larger forest animals (e.g., boar and deer) and domestic animals (e.g., cattle, dogs, goats, and sheep) do not have an important role in the maintenance of the virus in nature. However, deer and cattle have an important role in maintaining tick populations (22,23,40,48). Humans are incidental, dead-end hosts in the transmission cycle because they do not develop a level or duration of viremia sufficient to infect ticks or have sufficient numbers of attached ticks at one time to allow co-feeding (22,4951).

Alimentary transmission is a less frequent means of acquisition of TBE virus and occurs after ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products (e.g., milk and cheese) from infected cattle, goats, or sheep; transmission from goats is most commonly reported (5260). Large outbreaks linked to infected dairy products have been reported from areas where TBE is endemic, including one with approximately 600 cases (58,61,62). Approximately 47 laboratory-acquired TBE virus infections have occurred globally (6365). TBE virus transmission from infected breastfeeding women to their infants has been described in at least two published reports; one infant remained healthy and the other had severe sequelae (30,66). Other rare modes of transmission include blood transfusion, solid organ transplantation, and slaughtering of viremic animals (6769).

TBE virus is focally endemic in a geographic region extending from western and northern Europe through to northern and eastern Asia (https://www.cdc.gov/tick-borne-encephalitis/geographic-distribution/index.html). Although the geographic range of TBE virus is restricted by the presence of the tick vectors, areas of TBE virus transmission are more limited and focal than the tick distribution. TBE virus-infected ticks typically are found in discrete areas (i.e., foci) confined by the presence of environmental conditions that allow maintenance of the natural transmission cycle rather than being distributed evenly across a region (13,70,71). Natural foci can be small, with locations <1 square mile (72). Multiple factors are required for maintenance of virus circulation (e.g., favorable microclimatic conditions, interactions of ticks and vertebrate hosts, and local vegetation), which likely contribute to the focal occurrence (73). Within affected areas, tick population density and TBE virus infection rates can be highly variable. Infection rates in ticks typically range from 0.1% to 5%, although rates of approximately 40% in I. persulcatus ticks have been reported (21,7477).

During recent decades, TBE virus has emerged in new geographical foci in countries where the disease is endemic, and the overall area of recognized transmission has expanded westward and northward (1,26,7889). Since 2016, three countries have reported their first autochthonous cases (Belgium, England, and the Netherlands) (9092). New TBE foci also have been detected at higher altitudes, reaching elevations up to 2,100 meters (6,890 feet) above sea level (52,81,9395). Concurrently, in certain countries, a reduction in virus transmission and possible loss of recognized geographical foci have been documented (81,93). Various factors might be contributing to the changing distribution, including changes in climatic and ecologic conditions altering tick habitats and transmission cycles and dispersal of ticks into new areas by birds, deer, or other animals (22,40,79,96103).

In areas where TBE is endemic, approximately 5,00010,000 new cases are reported annually (9,104). However, this figure likely represents an underestimate of the actual number of cases because of underdiagnosis, underreporting, or both in certain countries (13,105108).

Incidence rates differ from country to country and depend on the local ecology and geographic distribution of the virus within the country. However, national incidence rates are not directly comparable because of variable approaches to surveillance, the extent of human and laboratory resources applied to surveillance, and the population vaccination coverage (109). Higher incidence rates are most commonly reported from the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), Slovenia, and the Czech Republic (110).

Annual variability in countries incidence rates is typical (86,109,110). The reasons for this variability are not completely understood but reflect the complex interactions among factors that affect risk for infection, including tick density, presence of animal hosts, ecologic conditions, weather, and human behavior (35,76,109112). Longer-term fluctuations in TBE incidence also occur (81). Incidence of reported cases has increased in multiple countries in recent decades while remaining stable or decreasing in others (27,111118). In addition to the factors affecting annual variability in the short term, socioeconomic factors (e.g., political instability and poverty) can affect disease incidence over the longer term (79,93,119123). Other factors that can lead to observed increases include improved awareness of TBE, increased access to laboratory diagnostics, and better surveillance (1,13,89,109,110,124). Of note, TBE became a reportable disease in the European Union in 2012 (125). Reduced incidence in certain countries is related to increased vaccine uptake over time; for example, in Austria, a vaccination program resulted in TBE incidence decreasing approximately sixfold from 5.7 cases per 100,000 population during 19721981 to 0.9 during 20022011 (126).

TBE can occur in persons of all ages, with encephalitis reported in one infant as young as 17 days (127). Incidence is typically low in children and increases with age, generally peaking in the 6069 years age group and then decreasing in the 70 years age group (17,86,110,111,115,128130). TBE is more common in males, with reported incidence rates often 1.52 times higher than in females, likely reflecting a greater risk for tick exposure (14,35,37,67,110112,115,131,132).

The main TBE virus transmission season is AprilNovember when ticks are most active because of warmer weather in the Northern Hemisphere (12,110,112,133,134). Peak transmission generally occurs for multiple weeks during the warm, humid summer months, typically during JuneAugust in European countries. However, in central and northern Europe, two peaks might occur in summer and early fall (12,15,16,23,37,111,112,115,135137). Unlike mosquitoborne diseases, large outbreaks of tickborne diseases do not occur. Occasional cases are reported during winter because tick activity is still possible at temperatures close to freezing (23,28,109,110,138).

Approximately three fourths of TBE virus infections are asymptomatic (67,139,140). Among patients who develop clinical symptoms after a bite from an infected tick, the incubation period is typically 714 days (range = 228 days) (17,90,141). For TBE acquired through the alimentary route, the typical incubation period is shorter, usually <2 weeks and often 24 days (53,57,60,142).

The most recognized clinical presentation of TBE is central nervous system infection (i.e., aseptic meningitis, meningoencephalitis, or meningoencephalomyelitis) (Box 1). Overall, meningitis is reported in approximately 35%45% of patients, meningoencephalitis in 45%55%, and meningoencephalomyelitis in 10% (14,17,18,37,137). However, younger patients (i.e., aged approximately 15 years) more frequently have meningitis, and the percentage of patients with more severe clinical presentations usually increases with age (12,14,17,18,131,133,143148). Relatively mild forms of disease (e.g., undifferentiated febrile illness) can occur (36,149). A chronic form of disease has been reported from Russia linked to infection with the Siberian subtype virus and, rarely, the Far Eastern subtype virus and is possibly associated with long-term viral persistence (18,36,150153). Progressive, slow development of neurologic symptoms often occurs, with or without an initial acute illness. In certain patients, the incubation period can be prolonged and symptoms can first manifest many years after a tick bite. A chronic relapsing form of disease also has been reported in Russia (152,153). Immunity after TBE virus infection is considered to be lifelong (49).

TBE can have a monophasic or biphasic illness course (i.e., an isolated neurologic illness alone or neurologic disease after an initial nonspecific illness). The monophasic disease course is the most common in infections caused by the Far Eastern and Siberian subtype viruses. The biphasic course is the most frequent in patients infected with the European subtype virus; approximately 65%75% of patients infected with the European subtype virus have a biphasic illness course (14,17,18,36,133,148,151,154). When biphasic illness occurs, the initial phase includes nonspecific symptoms (e.g., fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, nausea, and vomiting). These symptoms usually last for a median of approximately 4 days (range = 110 days), followed by a period of remission of approximately 7 days (range = 133 days), followed by the second (neurologic) phase (12,17,18,133,155).

Neurologic signs and symptoms of TBE vary but can include meningeal signs, altered mental status, cognitive dysfunction (e.g., decreased concentration and memory impairment), ataxia, rigidity, tremors, and cranial nerve and limb paresis or palsies. Limb involvement is more typically unilateral than bilateral, and the upper extremities are more often affected than the lower extremities (14). Seizures are not common with TBE caused by the European subtype virus (17,153,156,157).

Increasing age is a key risk factor for more severe disease. Other risk factors include infection with the Far Eastern subtype virus and being immunocompromised, and certain studies have found a correlation with the monophasic illness course (16,18,151,158163).

Among the limited number of published case reports of women infected during pregnancy, the clinical spectrum of illness appears similar to that of the nonpregnant population (164168). Apart from two reports from the 1960s in which the diagnostic methods used to confirm maternal infection were unclear, all infants born to infected mothers were reported to be healthy at birth and transplacental transmission of TBE virus had not been confirmed.

Clinical laboratory findings with TBE are nonspecific. In the initial phase of a biphasic illness, findings can include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or elevated hepatic enzymes (145,149,154). In the neurologic phase of disease, findings can include a peripheral leukocytosis, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and increased C-reactive protein levels (12,17,37,133,146). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing usually indicates a pleocytosis, typically lymphocytic, with moderately elevated protein levels (12,17,37,131,133). However, early in disease, neutrophils can predominate in CSF.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) occasionally detects abnormalities in the brain or spinal cord; however, sensitivity is low for diagnosis of TBE (169). In one prospective study in Germany, 18% (18 of 102) of patients with MRI results had abnormal findings, and in a retrospective study from Austria, 9% (four of 45) of patients with MRI results had abnormalities considered TBE related (17,170). Changes, when present, are most commonly observed in the thalamus, often bilaterally, and less often in the cerebellum, basal ganglia, brainstem, or other locations (17,147,171174). In patients with myelitis, radiculitis, or both, either alone or in association with encephalitis, spinal MRI can indicate changes such as T2-hyperintensities in the anterior horns of the cervical cord (171,175179). Computerized tomography scans do not usually identify any abnormalities (169). Abnormal electroencephalogram findings are common and can include diffuse slowing and focal abnormalities (17,132,133,147,173).

The laboratory diagnosis of TBE usually is based on detection of virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody in CSF or serum (180). An IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is routinely used for testing samples and usually is positive when neurologic symptoms are present. However, cross-reactivity with other flavivirus antibodies can occur because TBE virus shares common antigenic sites within its E protein with multiple other flaviviruses (49). Plaque reduction neutralization tests can be performed to discriminate between cross-reacting antibodies attributable to another primary flavivirus infection or to confirm recent TBE virus infection on the basis of a fourfold or higher increase in virus-specific neutralizing antibodies between acute- and convalescent-phase serum specimens. However, in patients who have been infected previously by another flavivirus or vaccinated with a different flavivirus vaccine (e.g., Japanese encephalitis or yellow fever vaccine), cross-reactive antibodies can make identifying a specific etiologic agent difficult (180). Vaccination history, date of symptom onset, and information about other flaviviruses known to circulate in the geographic area that might cross-react in serologic assays should be considered when interpreting results. In addition, possible antibody persistence from a previous TBE virus infection should be considered; serum IgM antibodies typically are detectable for approximately 34 months after infection but can persist for 3 years (12,181,182).

TBE virus occasionally has been isolated, or TBE viral RNA has been detected by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), in serum, whole blood, urine, or CSF samples when a patient has neurologic illness (50,51,67,92,127,168,183187). Although these methods are insufficiently sensitive for routine diagnostic purposes, NAATs can be of value in patients who are immunocompromised (158,188,189). In addition, if testing is done during the initial febrile (viremic) phase of illness before neurologic symptoms develop and antibodies are measurable, RNA often can be detected; however, patients usually only are tested after neurologic disease manifests (49,169,184). In fatal encephalitis cases, TBE virus RNA has been detected in brain tissue (68,184).

No commercially available tests for TBE virus infection are available in the United States. Diagnostic testing can be performed at CDC. Clinicians should contact their state or local health department or the Arboviral Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases (970-221-6400) for assistance with diagnostic testing.

No specific antiviral treatment for TBE is available. Patient management consists of supportive care, treatment of symptoms, and interventions to prevent secondary complications (e.g., aspiration pneumonia or urinary tract infection) (153,169). Patients with meningoencephalitis should be closely observed because coma or neuromuscular paralysis leading to respiratory failure can develop rapidly (36).

An anti-TBE virus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparation was previously used in Europe for postexposure prophylaxis or treatment. However, no effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials are available, and IVIG use was discontinued after reports of suspected antibody-dependent enhancement of infection resulting in a more severe course of disease (190193). In Russia and Kazakhstan, specific anti-TBE virus IVIG preparations continue to be used; information on their effectiveness is published primarily in the non-English literature (153).

The outcome of TBE largely depends on the patients age, clinical form of the disease, and virus subtype (194). Among patients with neurologic disease and infected with the European subtype virus, the case fatality rate is usually <2% (14,17,18,37,86,110,111,114,146,195,196). Fatality rates from infection with the Siberian subtype virus are higher but rarely exceed 6%8% (151). Rates of 20%40% were historically described with the Far Eastern subtype virus, although the extent of study methodology and patient inclusion criteria as contributing factors is unclear (62,151,197). In China, where the Far Eastern subtype virus is found, case-fatality rates were >25% in the 1950s; however, rates of <10% have been reported since the 1980s, purportedly related to improved disease awareness and quality of medical care (151,198). In Russia, where the Far Eastern and Siberian subtype viruses predominate, TBE mortality rates of approximately 2% have recently been reported (153).

Studies to assess frequency of sequelae have used variable symptom definitions, types of cohorts, investigation approaches, and durations of follow-up after illness to measure outcomes, making interpretation and comparison of studies difficult. A limitation of multiple studies is incomplete follow-up among the persons in the cohort, potentially biasing results. Among patients infected with the European subtype virus, sequelae have been reported in 20%40% overall, including neurologic sequelae (e.g., limb paresis or paralysis) in up to 10% (17,18,155,194,196). Sequelae have been reported with higher frequency after infection with the Far Eastern and Siberian subtype viruses, but the reported differences might be a result of methodologic differences in published reports.

The severity of reported sequelae ranges from mild symptoms with limited to no effect on quality of life to severe sequelae that interfere with activities of daily living. Reported serious outcomes of infection include permanent limb or cranial nerve palsies or paralysis, ataxia, and dysphasia (155,194). Milder symptoms include cognitive impairment (e.g., difficulties with memory or concentration), headaches, fatigue, tremors, hearing loss, emotional lability, or minor problems with balance or coordination (17,18,37,196). In a case-control study in Sweden with 92 patients and 58 controls with follow-up conducted from 2 to 15 years (median = 5.5 years) after TBE virus infection, patients scored significantly lower than controls in the domains of memory and learning, executive function (i.e., initiative and motivation), vigilance (i.e., concentration, attention, and fatigue), and physical impairment (i.e., fine motor skills, coordination, and balance) (199).

Certain symptoms can improve or resolve during the weeks to months after hospitalization (200). In one study, the median time to recovery was 13 weeks (range = 2156 weeks) among the patients who recovered completely or had only unrelated ongoing health issues (63%; 72 of 114) (196). However, patients occasionally have worsening of sequelae over time (18,173).

Severe outcomes are more frequent with increasing age and might be of particular concern for persons aged approximately 60 years (201). Older age has been correlated with a longer duration of hospitalization, lengthier time to recovery, higher case-fatality rate, and increased risk for sequelae (17,86,111,131,194,196). The association between older age and poor outcomes is likely related to immunosenescence with increasing age (202). Among children, deaths are rare and neurologic sequelae occur at low rates (<3%) (12,14,129,133,148,203). However, permanent, severe neurologic deficits can occur and subtle deficits (e.g., cognitive problems, headache, fatigue, or irritability) might be common (19,127,173,204).

TBE is rare among U.S. travelers to areas where the disease is endemic. Twelve TBE cases have been reported among U.S. adult and pediatric civilian (i.e., nonmilitary) travelers, including one case in 1979 and 11 cases during 20012021 (180,205,206) (Table 1). During 20012021, the mean was <1 reported case (range = 02 cases) annually. However, TBE cases might not have been identified if the illness was diagnosed overseas or if a clinician did not consider TBE in the differential diagnosis for a returning traveler with a compatible illness. On the basis of approximately 2025 million U.S. citizen trips to countries with TBE risk each year, and a mean of <1 diagnosed TBE case each year, the overall incidence of TBE among U.S. civilian travelers is low (207). However, certain persons who travel abroad will be at increased risk for infection because of location and season of travel, their activities, and other factors (Box 2).

Among the 12 TBE cases diagnosed in U.S. civilian travelers during 19792021, a total of 10 (83%) occurred in males, the median age was 38 years (range = 479 years), and infections were acquired in Europe, Russia, or China. Travel, and thus exposure to TBE virus, for all patients occurred during MayAugust. Among 11 travelers for whom information was available on duration of travel in areas where TBE is endemic, the median travel duration was 18 days (range = 769 days). All eight travelers with available data reported activities with risk for tick exposure, including hiking, camping, fishing, and trail running. Clinical illness occurred in a biphasic manner in eight (67%) patients. Eight (67%) patients had meningoencephalitis and four (33%) had meningitis, and no deaths occurred. Seven (58%) patients recovered completely, two (17%) had mild cognitive sequelae, one (8%) recovered but information on possible sequelae was unavailable, one (8%) had severe neurologic sequelae including dysarthria and mild limb bradykinesia, and one (8%) was discharged from acute care to a rehabilitation facility but their clinical outcome was unknown.

In addition to the 12 cases among civilian travelers, 12 TBE cases were diagnosed among U.S. military personnel (n = 8) or their dependent children (n = 4) during 20122021 (208210) (Table 2). One case occurred in 2012, and the remaining 11 occurred during 20172021. At the time of infection, all persons were living in Germany; nine persons had specific information available and all were living in Baden-Wrttemberg or Bavaria, Germanys two states with the highest number of reported annual TBE cases (86). On the basis of a mean of 1.2 cases per year among approximately 50,000 U.S. military personnel and dependents living in Germany, the TBE risk was similar to that of the local population of Baden-Wrttemberg and Bavaria where annual TBE incidence during 20122018 ranged from 0.7 to 2.0 cases per 100,000 population (86). Among the 12 TBE cases, 10 (83%) were in males, the median age was 33 years (range = 247 years), illness onsets occurred during AprilNovember, and nine (75%) had neurologic illness. Five (42%) patients recovered, including two who had short-term sequelae before complete recovery; four (33%) had no outcome information reported; and three (25%) experienced moderate sequelae.

In Europe, a median of 36 traveler cases (range = 2565 cases) wase reported to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control each year during 20142020 among the approximately 2,0003,800 TBE cases reported annually (211). However, because TBE is endemic in multiple areas of Europe and TBE vaccines are available, the number of traveler cases prevented by vaccination is unknown (212). Most cases occurred among persons who reported undertaking activities with risk for tick exposure, with only rare case reports of travelers with TBE acquired through ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products (142,213216). Local population TBE incidence data for multiple countries where the disease is endemic in Europe are published annually by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; however, infection risk for a traveler cannot be inferred from these data because the data might be influenced by surveillance methods, reporting practices, and vaccination coverage (104).

At least 47 laboratory-acquired TBE virus infections have been reported globally, and approximately all occurred before 1980 (6365,67). Among these 47 infections, 37 (79%) resulted in disease, and the remainder were asymptomatic infections. At least four of the infections occurred among U.S. laboratory workers; three cases were overt disease with two deaths reported, one was an asymptomatic infection, and all occurred before 1980. None of the infected laboratory workers was known to have received TBE vaccine. Limited information was available on transmission routes; however, all 10 cases with information reported were attributed to aerosolization during laboratory procedures or handling of infected animal waste. Transmission through accidental percutaneous or mucosal exposures is possible. Work with TBE virus typically is restricted to biosafety level (BSL)-4 facilities and practices (217).

Excerpt from:

Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory ... - CDC

U.K. recommendation could lead to world’s first use of meningitis … – STAT

November 11, 2023

An expert panel that advises the United Kingdom on vaccine policy has recommended using a meningitis B vaccine to try to bring down spiking rates of gonorrhea. If adopted, the U.K. would be the first country to use the meningitis B vaccine for this purpose.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization released a report Friday saying that targeted use of a meningitis B vaccine GSKs Bexsero in people at high risk of contracting gonorrhea should reduce the incidence of an infection that is becoming increasingly difficult to treat.

Introducing a MenB vaccination program to prevent gonorrhea in England would be a world first and should significantly help to reduce levels of gonorrhea, which are currently at a record high, JCVI Chair Andrew Pollard said in a statement.

The committee recommended the meningitis B vaccine should be offered to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who are at high risk of contracting gonorrhea, either because they currently have it or have been previously diagnosed with it, or who report high-risk sexual behavior with multiple partners. Gonorrhea infection does not induce immunity; people who have been cured can be reinfected.

The decision to offer the vaccine to an individual should be based on a risk assessment by a sexual health clinical professional, the JCVI report said. The report notes there is no evidence on whether being vaccinated while infected would work, so it recommends holding off on vaccination until the infection has been cured.

It also suggested other individuals at similar risk should be offered the vaccine. Those include transgender women, gender-diverse people assigned male at birth, and other people, regardless of gender, who are at high risk, including those with a recent history of a bacterial STI, and sex workers.

Gonorrhea is the second most commonly diagnosed sexually transmitted infection in England, with around 80,000 diagnoses a year.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the bacteria responsible for the infection, has over the years developed resistance to virtually every antibiotic that has been used to treat it. The current recommended therapy, ceftriaxone, is the last licensed antibiotic that can reliably cure gonorrhea. But there have been increasing reports of ceftriaxone-resistant cases of the infection.

A vaccination program to impact gonorrhea cases would be a hugely welcome intervention to ensure we are better prepared to address this increasing threat, said Katy Sinka, head of the sexually transmitted infections program at the U.K. Health Security Agency. We saw a rapid rise last year with more cases than ever before and with gonorrhea becoming increasingly resistant to antibiotics, tackling this infection is a serious concern.

JCVI also recommended routine use of mpox vaccine among at-risk people, a step that its U.S. equivalent, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, recommended last month. The U.K.s department of health and social care will now study both recommendations. It must approve them before the JCVI advice can be put into effect.

Bexsero protects against meningitis B, one of the serotypes of Neisseria meningitidis bacteria. It is closely related to Neisseria gonorrhoeae; the genetic sequences of the two are between 80% and 90% alike.

In theory, the similarity of the two bacteria suggests that the meningitis B vaccine could offer some protection against gonorrhea. And over the past decade or so, real-world evidence to support the idea has been piling up.

A range of studies that have been conducted in a number of countries have estimated that the vaccine is between about 33% and 42% effective at protecting against gonorrhea.

But to date all of the data supporting the use of the vaccine to protect against gonorrhea have been observational, meaning researchers have looked at gonorrhea rates in cohorts of people who received the vaccine for meningitis-control purposes. To get a clearer picture of whether and how well using it to protect against gonorrhea works, data from a randomized controlled trial that compares gonorrhea rates among vaccinated people to similar people who are unvaccinated will be needed.

Scientists funded by the National Institutes of Health are conducting just such a study, enrolling 2,200 adults in the U.S., Thailand, and sites in Africa. Jodie Dionne, an STI expert at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, is one of the trial site investigators and protocol co-chair. She told STAT that so far about 1,600 people have been enrolled. Its expected that the trial will reach full enrollment by mid-2024.

The trial will follow all participants for about 15 months after enrollment, so were not on the precipice of having data available very soon.

Asked about the JCVIs recommendation, Dionne noted that Bexsero has a good safety profile, which is reassuring in terms of what would be off-label use of the vaccine. But she thinks that making a decision like this without clinical trial data is early.

I think that waiting for the clinical trial data is preferable whenever you can, Dionne said. I think for the average person, they are reassured when I can tell them as their doctor, that this vaccine has been studied in a clinical trial and shown to be effective. As opposed to, Observational studies think maybe this will have an impact. Thats not quite as powerful.

If the vaccine is protective against gonorrhea, its not yet known for how long the protection will last, the JCVI report noted. It also said it will be important to impress upon people getting the vaccine that they are still at risk of becoming infected.

Although vaccination would be expected to reduce the chance of becoming infected with gonorrhea, it would not completely eliminate the possibility, it stated.

Read more from the original source:

U.K. recommendation could lead to world's first use of meningitis ... - STAT

Vaccine Rates Remain Down, Exemptions Are Up. What It Means for … – Education Week

November 11, 2023

Peak flu season hasnt struck yet. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention yesterday revealed signs pointing to a higher-than-normal incidence of a range of infectious illnesses, including influenza, this year.

Heres one reason why. CDC numbers released this week show national rates of certain required vaccinations (diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) and polio vaccines) for kindergartners hovering around 93 percent. These numbers, relatively flat over the past few years, have not rebounded to the pre-COVID level of 95 percent in 2019-20.

While 93 percent might sound high, some medical professionals are calling that rate worrisome.

Its going to impact attendance in schools and set up schools for preventable outbreaks that could impact not just students, but whole communities, said Lynn Nelson, president-elect of the National Association of School Nurses.

Heres a look at whats behind these trends, some immediate and potential implications, and tactics Nelson says can be effective at changing attitudes.

Nelson attributes the stubbornly flat vaccine rates to both vaccine hesitancy among parents and guardians, and challenges for families in accessing vaccinations.

Were dealing with a subset of parents who have really come to believe that vaccines in general are detrimental to their children, Nelson said.

She blames a general mistrust of the medical field and readily available misinformation, spread on social media sites and by word of mouth, for fueling this belief. It used to be that families with young children would trust their health-care providers, she said. Now, some people are generally distrustful of the medical field.

The repercussions of this distrust extend beyond the skeptics themselves. For instance, the presence of protesters at school vaccine clinicsusually families and other community members who are against vaccine mandatescan dissuade other nearby districts from hosting clinics of their own.

In some communities that are vaccine hesitant, districts will not even put on clinics, Nelson said.

Negative attitudes about vaccines can also sway public officials decisions around vaccine mandates. For instance, The city council in the District of Columbia voted this week to repeal a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for eligible public school students that was passed in 2021.

Testifying before thecouncil, Thomas Farley, senior deputy director of community health administration with the districts health department, said that parents resistance [to the vaccine] would make it very difficult to enforce a mandate for COVID-19, according to a local news report .

In addition to less than ideal vaccination rates, health officials report an increase across states in vaccine exemptions, which allow parents to opt out of having their children vaccinated. Up to 3 percent of children entering kindergarten in 2022-2023 received a vaccine exemption for medical, religious, and/or philosophical reasons. (Currently, 50 states allow medical exemptions, 44 offer religious exemptions, and 15 states permit philosophical/personal belief exemptions.)

Overall, the share of vaccine exemptions rose in 40 states and the District of Columbia. In 10 states, such exemptions exceeded 5 percentthe point where achievable vaccination coverage against a preventable disease is no longer applicable, according to health officials.

Also this week a high school in Carlisle, Pa.among the 15 states that allow exemptions for medical, religious, and philosophical reasonsconfirmed 10 cases of pertussis, or whooping cough, among its students. Two weeks ago, the Pennsylvania department of public health confirmed a similar outbreak in Cumberland County, Pa. Two standard childhood vaccinations protect against pertussis: DTaP and Tdap. Before the vaccines development, pertussis was a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. But incidents of the illness dropped from between 150,000 and 250,000 cases per year to a low of 1,010 cases in 1976. Its back on the rise, in part because of waning adolescent and adult immunity, according to data from the National Institutes of Health .

Amid these challenges to vaccinations, Nelson acknowledged that school nurses, as trusted members of the community, can have a positive influence on families decision-making.

I do think those personal efforts to reach out to families, such as phone calls from a school nurse, can influence them much more effectively than broader campaigns, she said.

Some school communities struggling with a lack of access to health-care providers, especially in rural locales, have had success bringing vaccine clinics to schools. Generally, the school nurse will partner with a local health-care provider whos willing to travel and set up a clinic at school, usually on weekends or after school. Typically, state departments of public health will contract with private pharmacies and provide vaccines to students free of charge, Nelson explained.

Weve had really good results doing this, she said, referring to Washington State, where there is a large number of rural and remote school districts.

Theres one other thing that can change behavior, although its not one health professionals ever want to see: When an outbreak of a preventable infectious disease affects a community where vaccine hesitancy runs high.

Nelson said shes old enough to remember outbreaks of pertussis, whose spread has the most deleterious effects on infants, the elderly, and people who are immunocompromised.

These outbreaks generally serve as a catalyst for people to get vaccinated, she said. Sometimes, thats what it takes to get people to think differently about vaccinations.

View post:

Vaccine Rates Remain Down, Exemptions Are Up. What It Means for ... - Education Week

Page 147«..1020..146147148149..160170..»