More states are finding bird flu in cattle. This is what scientists are watching for – WPR
                            April 17, 2024
                                Updated April 11, 2024 at 4:14 PM ET  
    The outbreak of bird flu in dairy cattle is still unfolding.  
    Both North Carolina and South Dakota have     detected the virus in dairy herds, bringing the total    number of states affected to eight.  
          Sign up for WPRs email newsletter.        
    The unlikely spread among cattle and one dairy worker has    scientists looking through the data to better understand this    spillover. They say the risk to humans hinges on whether the    virus can evolve in key ways to better infect mammals.  
    So far, theres some reassuring news: At a recent meeting,    scientists from the U.S. Department of Agriculture     said the virus is not presenting like a respiratory illness    in cattle  meaning the animals dont appear to be shedding    large amounts of virus from their nose or mouths.  
    Instead, federal health officials investigating the outbreak    suspect some form of mechanical transmission is responsible    for spreading the virus within the herd. This may be happening    during the process of milking the cows, a theory supported by    the fact that high concentrations of virus are being found in    the milk.  
    The samples collected from infected animals and shared publicly    do not suggest the virus has undergone radical changes that    would be cause for alarm.  
    But there are certain signs of trouble in the genome of the    virus that scientists are looking out for as it finds a way    into more mammals.  
    We really need to keep on top of this, because I think we are    at a bit of a precipice where something interesting or    unfortunate could happen, says Michelle    Wille, a senior research fellow at the Center for Pathogen    Genomics at the University of Melbourne.  
    Genetic sequencing of the virus in the Texas dairy worker    showed it had undergone a mutation in a gene, PB2, that    commonly gets affected when the virus infects mammals.  
    This is a clue that the virus is evolving to better replicate    inside a mammal, but its not sufficient to make the virus    transmit more easily between humans, says Nichola Hill,    a disease ecologist at the University of Massachusetts Boston.  
    Sometimes we see these early markers of adaptation, she says,    It needs a handful [of markers] coordinated across multiple    different gene segments for it to really be this breakthrough    and the next pandemic.  
    And it would need to become better at transmitting through the    air, like the seasonal influenza viruses that humans tend to    catch. Currently most cases of bird flu in people are linked to    direct contact with an infected animal, oftentime when a    chicken is being slaughtered, says David Swayne, a poultry    veterinarian who used to work for the USDA.  
    It takes a very, very high dose, he says, Its probably not    just exposure to infected poultry  its exposure to processes    that aerosolized the virus.  
    But the fear is that could change as the virus spends more time    in mammals:  
    Specifically, the protein that the virus uses to bind to cells    could evolve to lock onto the receptors in the upper    respiratory tract of humans. This would allow it to easily gain    access and churn out copies of itself.  
    Thats considered basically a main barrier that prevents this    from becoming a virus that could spread efficiently between    people, says     Darwyn Kobasa, head of high containment respiratory viruses    at Canadas National Microbiology Laboratory.  
    When the virus has spilled into mammals, scientists have not    seen a lot of evolution in this function over the last few    years, says Anice Lowen, a professor of microbiology and    immunology at Emory University.  
    Lowen says previous research has shown the protein on the virus    would not only need to recognize the human receptors in our    upper airways but also become more stable, presumably so it    doesnt fall apart during transmission through the air.  
    These two changes  plus mutations in the PB2 gene to support    replication  would all need to come together to support    efficient spread in mammals, she says. Of course, she adds,    theres potentially other factors that we dont yet    understand.  
    There are still big questions about exactly how bird flu plays    out in cattle, since its only now being followed closely.    There certainly are many mutations that occurred with this    jump from wild birds into cattle and we dont necessarily    understand what they mean, says Hill.  
    With millions of birds infected all over the globe, its likely    that many mammals are being infected through consuming dead    birds or being exposed to feces.  
    Wille says the virus may have been introduced into dairy cattle    in a similar way, perhaps infected birds somehow got into their    feed.  
    Its not that hard to imagine that we have a sort of    contaminated feed situation, she says  
    But this kind of reasoning may not fully explain mass infection    events in some mammals, including unprecedented die-offs of    seals and sea lions in South America and an outbreak on a mink    farm in Spain.  
    Its still not clear whats driving transmission in those    instances, maybe animals were spreading it to each other, says    Wille.  
    Experiments done in labs offer some clues. They have shown    mammals can pass on this version of H5N1, and even offer some    preliminary evidence suggesting limited airborne transmission.  
    In one     recent study, scientists at the Centers for Disease Control    and Prevention analyzed how an isolate of the virus taken from    a severe human case in Chile spread among ferrets.  
    They found that variant had a high capacity to cause fatal    disease among the animals and that it showed enhanced ability    to replicate in human cells cultured in the lab, but did not    exhibit productive transmission in respiratory droplets or via    contaminated surfaces when tested in animals.  
    A     separate study by scientists at Canadas National    Microbiology Laboratory infected ferrets in the lab with    samples of the virus collected from wild animals.  
    Those experiments found a particular version of the virus,    taken from a hawk, could transmit very rapidly from ferret to    ferret through direct contact and cause lethal infection in the    originally uninfected animals, says Kobasa, senior author of    the study which has not yet been published.  
    They also found evidence the virus had spread through the air    between ferrets in different cages, but they didnt see severe    illness in the animals who were infected in this way. Its    possible there wasnt enough virus being transmitted to    overcome the immune barriers that would prevent infection, he    says.  
    The results are very preliminary and what happens under    controlled lab conditions isnt necessarily indicative of what    can happen in the wild, he says. We certainly dont see any    changes that would suggest that theres any way to support    efficient airborne transmission.  
    While helpful, Lowen says experiments on ferrets need to be    interpreted with caution, especially in the context of humans.  
    She says overall theres still very limited evidence for    transmission through the air: The fact that ferrets transmit    pretty consistently in contact exposure is a bit concerning,    but these results dont throw up a lot of red flags for me.  
The rest is here: 
More states are finding bird flu in cattle. This is what scientists are watching for - WPR