Category: Covid-19

Page 734«..1020..733734735736..740750..»

Why a Covid-19 surge is likely this fall and winter – Vox.com

September 30, 2020

The surge of Covid-19 cases and deaths in America over the summer resulted from a toxic mix of factors: states reopening, lockdown fatigue, and a season typically filled with vacations and holidays like Memorial Day and the Fourth of July. People gathered and celebrated indoors at bars, restaurants, and friends and familys homes. Millions of people got sick, and tens of thousands died.

This fall, experts worry it will all happen again: States are rolling back restrictions, people are eager to get back to normal, and Thanksgiving and Christmas are coming up. America may be on the verge of repeating the same mistakes, which would risk yet another surge in the Covid-19 epidemic.

Coronavirus cases have already trended up since mid-September. On September 12, the US hit a recent low in its seven-day case average of around 35,000. As of September 26, it was back up to almost 45,000. The surge doesnt seem to be driven by any one particular state although some, like the Dakotas, are doing quite badly but rather upticks across much of the country all at once. (Increased testing capacity is likely detecting more cases, too.)

Part of the problem is America never really suppressed its Covid-19 cases to begin with. Think of a disease epidemic like a forest fire: Its going to be really difficult to contain the virus when there are still flames raging in parts of the forest and small embers practically everywhere. The country always risks a full blaze with each step toward reopening and with each failure to take precautions seriously.

Consider Florida. This month, the state reopened bars and, more recently, restaurants, despite the high risk of these indoor spaces. The last time Florida opened bars, in June, experts said the establishments were largely to blame for the states massive Covid-19 outbreak in the summer. As Florida reopens now, it has roughly two to three times the number of Covid-19 cases that it had in early June, and its test positivity rate suggests its still likely missing a lot of cases. The state is fanning its flames while its most recent fire is nowhere near extinguished.

This is, in effect, what much of the country is doing now as it rushes to reopens schools, particularly colleges and universities, and risky indoor spaces. Coupled with recent Labor Day celebrations, experts worry thats already leading to a new surge in Covid-19 cases.

President Donald Trump, for his part, has encouraged rapid reopenings. From his LIBERATE tweets in the spring to his recent demands that schools reopen, Trump has pushed forward with his efforts to return society to normal even as the coronavirus keeps spreading and killing people in the US.

The fall and winter threaten to make things much worse. Schools will continue to reopen. The cold in northern parts of America will push people back inside, where the virus has a much easier time spreading than the outdoors. Families and friends will come together for the holidays. A flu season could strain the health care system further.

States are once again starting to reopen more widely, as officials face pressure from businesses to reopen indoor dining before colder temperatures make outdoor activities less feasible. Experts worry that Americans as a whole will get even more fatigued with social distancing, now that the country is more than six months into its battle against Covid-19.

Its less excusable this time, Crystal Watson, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told me. We have an example of what happens when we reopen these types of businesses for indoor activities.

The good news is theres still time to act. Cities, states, and the country as a whole could take social distancing seriously again. They could require masks where they arent already mandated. They could close bars and restaurants, supporting these businesses with a bailout, to prioritize keeping K-12 schools open while reducing other risks. Colleges and universities could ease demands for in-person teaching or at least embrace aggressive testing-and-tracing measures to mitigate the risks of causing further Covid-19 outbreaks.

Without these steps, the fall and winter outbreaks could end up worse than the summer and potentially even the spring. That could mean not just more infections and deaths but yet another setback in Americas hopes of getting parts of life closer back to normal.

If you do things the right way, you can do them, Cedric Dark, an emergency medicine physician at the Baylor College of Medicine, told me. If you do them the wrong way, then youre going to get cases.

After the spring outbreaks hit the Northeast of the US, much of the country, led by conservative states like Arizona, Florida, and Texas, moved forward with aggressive reopenings. The problem, experts said, is many of these places never suppressed their Covid-19 outbreaks. As epidemiologist Pia MacDonald at RTI International told me at the time, many states never got to flat. Case counts continued to climb, and states continued to reopen anyway.

This created an environment that made it much easier for Covid-19 to spread. If theres already some community transmission going on, then its simply going to be more likely that one person will infect another. Add more spaces in which infections are very likely particularly close indoor spaces like bars and restaurants and that risk can be increased dramatically.

Today, the US seems to be heading in the same direction. While cases have fallen overall since late July, they plateaued at and recently started rising from a point that was still higher than the peak of Covid-19 cases in the spring (partly, but likely not entirely, attributable to more testing). Yet many states are moving forward with reopening once again.

So MacDonald is now repeating the same thing she told me this summer: We never got to low enough levels [of Covid-19] to start with in most places.

Of particular interest is indoor dining at restaurants and bars, which are reopening at varying levels across the country. Experts characterize these settings as perhaps the worst imaginable spaces for Covid-19 spread: People are close together for long periods of time; they cant wear masks as they eat or drink; the air cant dilute the virus like it can outdoors; and alcohol could lead people to drop their guards further. It was a recognition of all these risks that led many states to scale back and close indoor dining and bars during their summer outbreaks.

This time, though, theres another major variable: Schools are reopening. Some places have even reopened, or set plans to reopen, schools alongside bars or indoor dining making it hard to separate the effects of either and potentially compounding new outbreaks.

Already, there have been reports of outbreaks in K-12 settings, where students and teachers can potentially transmit the coronavirus to each other in the classroom. But theres still a lot we dont know about how younger kids, particularly in elementary schools, spread the virus.

Some experts raised graver concerns about colleges and universities. Students in these institutions arent just potentially spreading the coronavirus in their classrooms, although thats likely happening to some degree. Theyre also showing up at bars, clubs, and indoor restaurants, partying at dorms, and drinking a lot more than they should.

College kids are college kids, Carlos del Rio, executive associate dean of the Emory University School of Medicine, told me. Thats what I always tell every university president I talk to: You can make all the plans you want, but at the end of the day, its what happens outside your plans that matters.

The good news, for now, is that infections in colleges and universities will skew younger, and younger people are less likely to suffer major complications, including deaths, from Covid-19. That helps explain, along with general improvements in treatment, why daily Covid-19 deaths have still trended down since August (although theyre still at more than 700 a day in the US).

But young people can still get seriously ill and die from the coronavirus and if enough of them get infected, that could show up in higher death tolls eventually. Even if that doesnt happen, young people will likely interact with their teachers, parents, and grandparents at some point, potentially infecting them. That could produce yet another outcome that would look similar to the summer: The outbreaks started among young groups first but eventually spread to older populations who were more susceptible to illness and death.

After the summer surges, Brown University School of Public Health dean Ashish Jha told me, I was like, Okay, now weve all been through this every part of the country: the South, the West, the Midwest, the Northeast. Theres no denialism anymore that will work, because theres been this long denial while its been there but not here. Yet, he said, were starting to see this again.

He added, I, at this point, feel like I clearly no longer understand why our country cant learn its lessons and why we keep repeating the same mistakes.

For months, experts have worried that the fall and winter would lead to more outbreaks, citing, as one contributor, the reopening of schools. That seems to be happening now, as cases start to creep up nationwide, with reported outbreaks in K-12 schools, colleges, and universities around the US.

But things could still get worse.

People are bound to get more fatigued with social distancing and the pandemic more broadly as time drags on. As months pass since the last huge wave of Covid-19 in the US, people are more likely to convince themselves its safe out there. If that happens, more people could end up going out and putting themselves in dangerous settings, infecting each other along the way.

At the same time, colder temperatures, particularly in the northern parts of the US, will more likely push people indoors, where the virus is much more likely to spread thanks to poor ventilation. (One upside: This could have the opposite effect in southern parts of the country, where temperatures will get less unbearably hot, so the outdoors may actually get more tolerable.)

As Thanksgiving rolls around, followed by Christmas, Hanukkah, and New Years, families and friends will likely come together from around the country. That includes college and university students, who could come home from Covid-19 hot spots back in their dorms or classrooms.

If you put this all together, theres a real risk of a truly nationwide Covid-19 outbreak. As people come together from all over the country and return to home and school, they risk carrying the disease across local and state borders. That could result in a much more dispersed and perhaps larger coronavirus epidemic than the US has seen so far.

People will bring this back during Thanksgiving, during Christmas, during winter break, Dark said. This is a disease that has an incubation period of up to two weeks. So its not really safe to say, Okay, Im going to come home, and come back. By the time you develop symptoms, youve already exposed your parents.

On top of all that, another flu season this fall and winter could strain health care systems, hindering hospitals abilities to treat Covid-19 patients and potentially contributing to more deaths.

There are reasons to think it wont get so bad. Maybe since so many people have already gotten sick in the US, there will be enough community immunity, as long as theres enough social distancing and masking, to mitigate spread. Maybe people wont ease up on proper precautions after seeing 200,000 Covid-19 deaths in the US. Perhaps social distancing and masking for Covid-19 will hold off another flu season, as seemed to happen in the Southern Hemisphere.

But theres a risk. And the numbers are already heading in the wrong direction.

The next number in the fall is likely going to shoot way up, Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, told me. Likely well beyond 65,000, 70,000, the summers previous peak. I think this fall is going to be the biggest spike of all.

None of this set in stone. Experts told me again and again that the US still has time to act before it sees a repeat of the summer or worse.

None of the ideas to prevent all of this are shocking or new. Theyre all things people have heard before: More testing and contact tracing to isolate people who are infected, get their close contacts to quarantine, and deploy broader restrictions as necessary. More masking, including mandates in the 16 states that still dont have one. More careful, phased reopenings.

This is whats worked in other countries, from Germany to South Korea to New Zealand, to contain outbreaks. Its what studies support: As a review of the research published in The Lancet found, evidence shows that physical distancing of more than 1 m is highly effective and that face masks are associated with protection, even in non-health-care settings.

Its also whats worked in the US. After suffering huge outbreaks in the spring, states like New York and Massachusetts have suppressed the coronavirus with such policies. Cities, such as San Francisco, have avoided bad outbreaks entirely with similar efforts. Even single universities, like the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign campus, have seen promising early results with aggressive testing and tracing. (The federal government would ideally be in charge of all of this, but Trump has by and large punted the pandemic down to the states to resolve.)

Theres no mystery about what causes new cases, Nahid Bhadelia, an infectious diseases physician and medical director of the Special Pathogens Unit at Boston University School of Medicine, told me. We have to make trade-off choices.

Much of the issue comes back to a careful reopening process. For this, some experts pointed to a budget model. The goal is to keep the spread of the coronavirus low enough that each new infection doesnt always lead to more infections, making it so over time the country slides to zero cases. In other words, the goal is to keep the effective reproduction number, or R0 or Rt in scientific parlance, below one. Within that limited budget of an R0 or Rt lower than one, states can try to fit some places to reopen but not everything.

Everything that reopens will add to the infection rate. Some places may have tiny, even negligible effects, such as parks. Some are bigger threats, like bars and indoor dining. And some may carry potentially high risk but still seem worth it to the community for their social benefits, like schools.

The goal, then, is to balance out a reopening doing it slowly, making it possible to see the effects of each extra step to make sure outbreaks dont get out of control. Ultimately, it may require not opening bars or indoor dining, perhaps ever, so schools and other more socially crucial places can open. At the same time, the government could offer shuttered businesses a bailout or other financial supports.

For us, as a society, to be able to send children to school, we have to make tough decisions and sacrifices in other areas, Jorge Salinas, an epidemiologist at the University of Iowa, told me. We cant have it all.

Other steps, too, could help build a bigger budget. More testing, tracing, and masking, for example, could reduce the infection rate in a community further, regardless of what else is going on.

By striking this balance, the country can not only avoid more infections and deaths but potentially an outbreak from getting so bad that it necessitates another lockdown. While experts all agreed that theres zero political appetite for a lockdown right now, a massive surge in the fall and winter could leave the US with no other option. Israel, for example, has shut down until early October at the earliest after suffering a massive increase in cases.

The reality is that the US will likely not go back to normal until it vanquishes the virus through a vaccine or similar treatment a process that could take months or years, even after a vaccine is proven safe and effective, as the country and world scale up distribution to actually reach sufficient levels of immunity within the population.

But maybe the US will continue muddling along, or worse. The country has already shown a much higher tolerance for Covid-19 cases and deaths than the rest of the developed world. Trump, for his part, seems content with that recently stating that the coronavirus affects virtually nobody and showing no interest in changing his hands-off approach.

If that holds, America could suffer tens of thousands more predictable, preventable deaths, on top of the 200,000 Covid-19 deaths its already seen.

Read the original:

Why a Covid-19 surge is likely this fall and winter - Vox.com

Orgenesis inks Koligo buyout to gain COVID-19 cell therapy – FierceBiotech

September 30, 2020

Orgenesis has struck a deal to acquire Koligo Therapeutics. The takeover will give Orgenesis control of an autologous cell therapy treatment for respiratory disease caused by COVID-19.

Koligos business is built on technologies for developing autologous cell therapies, including a system for printing 3D cell and tissue constructs with a vascular network. In the case of the COVID-19 program KT-PC-301, Koligo is using its technologies to harvest fat from patients infected with the coronavirus and process the material into a cell therapy.

The COVID-19 therapy contains mesenchymal stem cells, vascular endothelial cells and immune cells that Koligo expects to migrate to the lung and other sites of inflammation when readministered back into the patient. By getting the cells to sites of inflammation, Koligo thinks it may be able to improve oxygenation, support antibody production and induce an anti-inflammatory effect. Those effects may help patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by the pandemic coronavirus.

From Concept to Market: Overcoming the Challenges of Manufacturing and Clinical Trials

Learn how CRO/CDMOs successfully address operational and regulatory challenges for pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients; and how this can make the difference between study success or failure.

Orgenesis is set to pay $15 million in stock to acquire KT-PC-301 and the rest of Koligos assets. After closing the takeover, Orgenesis will keep members of Koligos management including CEO Matthew Lehman and Chief Medical Officer Michael Hughes on to handle work related to the acquired assets. The start of a 75-subject phase 2 trial of KT-PC-301 is high on Koligos to-do list.

The deal will also give Orgenesis a commercially available treatment for chronic and recurrent acute pancreatitis and Koligos 3D-V bioprinting technology. The commercial product, Kyslecel, is made by resecting the pancreas from a patient, isolating pancreatic islet cells and infusing the minimally modified islets back into the patient.

Koligo has treated 40 patients with Kyslecel at six U.S. hospitals through a commercial pilot, generating revenues of around $2 million. Lehman expects the commercialization effort to benefit from the support of Orgenesis, which is connected to a network of hospitals and healthcare centers through its own point-of-care cell therapy platform.

Orgenesis sees its platform as complementary to the tools it is set to acquire from Koligo, leading CEO Vered Caplan to frame the takeover as a boost for his effort to implement new technologies to improve efficacy and lower the costs of cell and gene therapies. Caplan, in a statement to disclose the takeover, added that COVID-19 cell therapy KT-PC-301 may have applications in the treatment of other acute and chronic respiratory indications.

Visit link:

Orgenesis inks Koligo buyout to gain COVID-19 cell therapy - FierceBiotech

More Cases Connected to COVID-19 Cluster at Brigham and Women’s Hospital – NBC10 Boston

September 30, 2020

The number of COVID-19 cases linked to a coronavirus cluster at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston has increased.

The hospital announced Thursday that 19 patients and staff members had tested positive. As of Monday, there are a total of 42 cases connected to the outbreak.

"To date, 488 employees connected to the cluster have been tested with 30 testing positive," the hospital said in a statement. "All current inpatients are being tested for COVID-19, and this will be repeated every three days. This is in addition to the current hospital policy which requires testing for all patients upon admission and daily screening for symptoms. We have tested 581 patients across all inpatient areas, and 12 have tested positive. These 12 had been previously identified as connected to the cluster."

In-depth news coverage of the Greater Boston Area.

Due to patient privacy concerns, the hospital said it was not able to provide any information on the conditions of the people who tested positive.

The hospital said it is working to make sure that others who may have been exposed are identified and tested. Any staff members who are symptomatic or have tested positive are being sent home immediately.

The cause of the cluster has not been determined. Brigham and Women's said it is investigating the source through contact tracing, testing and staff interviews.

"The Brigham is committed to creating and maintaining a safe care environment by testing all patients admitted to the hospital, requiring staff to attest to their health daily before working, requiring all staff, patients and visitors to wear hospital-issued masks while on campus, insisting on frequent hand hygiene, frequently cleaning the environment, and enforcing appropriate physical distancing," the hospital said.

Hospital officials believe the cluster was contained to two inpatient units and say it did not impact other parts of the hospital.

Admissions to the affected units were temporarily suspended and visitors were being restricted. The hospital said it is safe to visit other parts of the facility, but visitors are being restricted to certain areas.

Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker said Brigham and Women's reported the cluster to the state Department of Public Health immediately.

"We expect to work with them to chase down any additional cases that may have occurred," the governor said. "We'll do everything we can to support them to make sure the outbreak is contained."

Originally posted here:

More Cases Connected to COVID-19 Cluster at Brigham and Women's Hospital - NBC10 Boston

Cleaning for COVID-19: Are household disinfectants and sanitizers harmful to our health? – Nevada Today

September 30, 2020

Find more answers here!

We get used to the new normal sanitization in the COVID-19 world. Every day, we apply various chemical disinfectants in our homes, offices and classrooms, aiming to kill the novel coronavirus on high-touch surfaces. The novel coronavirus has been found to remain viable on hard, non-porous surfaces for hours to even days. To date, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and regulatory agencies in other countries have published lists of recommended cleaning products for use against the virus. The virucidal ingredients in these products include alcohols, phenols, quaternary ammonium compounds (quats), and many others. You may be unfamiliar with the name quats, but if checking the labels of disinfecting sprays, hand sanitizers and sanitizing wipes in your homes, you would easily find the members of the quats family: benzalkonium chlorides, benzethonium chloride, alkyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chlorides, dodecyl dimethyl ammonium chlorides and so on.

Probably. During the past decades, a growing number of scientists have linked some disinfecting chemicals with developmental and reproductive problems among animals in the laboratories. For instance, when intentionally feeding animals with high doses of quats, scientists observed increased rates of neural tube defects, infertility, and enzyme inhibition. While there has not been any evidence confirming a direct link between disinfectant use with toxicity in humans, toxicologists and health scientists call for more scrutiny of the safety of disinfectant chemicals.

Before giving a definitive yes or no, lets recall how we use cleaning products on hard surfaces at home: after use, most of us let the disinfected surfaces or objects air dried without wiping up excess disinfectants. In this situation, disinfectants would remain on the surfaces or objects all day long. When our kids climb on the disinfected table surfaces or countertops as if they conquered Mount Everest, or touch the disinfected toys, doorknobs and electronics, disinfectants stealthily migrate to the skin of their palms or fingers. The kids may then take in disinfectants when licking or biting their hands. According to our recent research on 22 disinfecting ingredients, such an unintended mouthing-mediated intake is not trivial: when disinfectants are used at full strength without dilution, the unintended mouthing-mediated intake is prevalently more than 2,000 times higher than intake through deliberate contact with disinfectants, such as skin absorption during handwashing. The unintended mouthing-mediated intake is less relevant for alcohols and phenols, as they can easily turn into gases and are ventilated out from the room. However, quats cannot easily change into gases and would stay on the surfaces for a long time if not wiped off. The unintended mouthing-mediated intake is particularly notable for kids because they are more frequent in licking palms, wiping mouth and sucking thumb than adults are. For instance, our recent study also shows that the intake of a 3-year-old kid is typically 55 times higher than that of an adult for some quats.

Unfortunately, we do not have a conclusive answer at this moment. In a risk assessment, scientists usually compare the level of chemical intake with the minimum level of a chemical leading to a certain health outcome. Yet, scientists have not yet to reach a consensus regarding which health outcome should be used as the criterion in a risk assessment. In our recent work, we attempted to characterize the risks using two approaches in parallel. On the one hand, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends the use of a concept called reference dose to describe the minimum amount of a chemical posing systemic toxicity to the human body (this reference dose is derived from animal, not human, studies at this moment). If this criterion is applied, our assessment shows that around 40% of the 22 disinfectants studied in our work can be somewhat risky at the intake level of kids. Other scientists propose the use of cell studies to assess how toxic a chemical is to certain biological activities or functions of a cell. If this criterion is applied, our assessment shows that there is little risk for most disinfecting chemicals. However, no matter which criterion is used, triclosan, triclocarban and benzethonium chloride (one of the quats) would to some extent pose health risks to kids. Triclosan and triclocarban have been removed from the list of ingredients generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but they are still allowed to be used in other countries.

Of course, it is by no means wise or prudent to stop disinfecting your homes because the pandemic is the primary risk at this moment. However, we can still do something to prevent our kids to be overexposed to disinfectants. For instance, we may use disinfectants that tends to go into the air, instead of quats, for indoor surfaces with which kids are in frequent contact. Alcohols, e.g., 70% ethyl or isopropyl alcohol, may be an ideal option. We may also wipe up excess disinfectants after disinfecting surfaces accessible to kids. But keep in mind that before wiping off, we need to keep the surface wet for an appropriate contact time based on the manufacturer guideline to ensures disinfectants inactivate the pathogens.

Li Li, Ph.D.Assistant Professor Li Lis research focuses on developing, evaluating and applying computational models to describe how human-made chemicals reside, travel and change in human society, the environment and the human body. His work seeks to inform the environmentally sound management of potentially worrisome chemicals on the market. Dr. Li's Health & Environment Assessment Team| @ModelerLi on Twitter

Dingsheng Li, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dingsheng Lis research focuses on assessing human exposure to chemicals and resulting health risks with various models. He is also involved in the development of Life Cycle Impact Assessment. His goal is to highlight chemicals of health risks and provide insights to allocate resources to safeguard human health more efficiently. Dingsheng Li, Ph.D. on LinkedIn| @fallentwo on Twitter

View original post here:

Cleaning for COVID-19: Are household disinfectants and sanitizers harmful to our health? - Nevada Today

As Covid-19 Looms, Some Workers Face Loss of Health Insurance – The New York Times

September 30, 2020

Health insurance is an enormous cost for small businesses, said Amanda Ballantyne, the executive director of the Main Street Alliance, an advocacy group for small businesses. It continues to be even after the passage of the Affordable Care Act.

Many businesses say they need Congress to provide more money, and health insurers say they support federal efforts to help employers continue their coverage. We believe Congress should provide temporary subsidies or direct financial assistance for employers to protect the health and financial stability of hard-working Americans, said Justine Handelman, a senior vice president at the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, which represents the nations Blue Cross plans.

Under the Affordable Care Act, insurers must return the excess profits if they do not spend at least 80 or 85 cents out of every dollar in premiums on customers health care. But even that provision strikes some as inadequate, given the current circumstances and the timing of the potential rebates.

We are in the middle of a once-in-a-century health and economic crisis, and it will take everyone stepping up to do their part to get us past it including health insurance companies, said Representative Lauren Underwood, a Democrat from Illinois.

Dave Piersall, the owner of Lake Marine & RV, a boating business in Woodstock, Ill., used some of his federal aid on the $7,400-a-month insurance bill to cover his employees. We came within inches of being canceled, he said.

Although his business has rebounded as people have bought boats to help them cope with staying home, he worries about the coming cold weather. I would be lying if I didnt say winter is a scary time for the boat business, Mr. Piersall said. The health care is the biggest concern.

And as hard as he is trying to maintain insurance for everyone, he is also concerned about efforts to do away with Obamacare. He was uninsured for a year and a half after leaving a corporate job to start the business before he could enroll in an A.C.A. plan that covered his Crohns disease.

Follow this link:

As Covid-19 Looms, Some Workers Face Loss of Health Insurance - The New York Times

As young adults seed the spread of COVID-19, health messaging targets them – The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

September 27, 2020

In late July, at one of his weekly COVID press conferences, Gov. Steve Bullock said young people have been driving the spread of COVID-19 throughout Montana.

Were seeing more and more that the younger age groups are contributing to our increase in cases, Bullock said.

At the press conference, Caty Gondeiro, a 23-year-old Helena resident, shared her personal COVID-19 story. Gondeiro didnt know where she contracted it, but said she hadnt been taking the virus too seriously. She developed moderate symptoms, and more than three weeks after testing positive she still struggled to take walks. But she said she was less concerned about herself than about the people in her life who might not recover if she passed the virus on to them.

Were driving the spread of this. While we may recover from this, we have people in our lives that wont, Gondeiro said.

The message was aimed at people under the age of 40, who have accounted for 54.4% of all cases across Montana through mid-September, and a much higher number in some areas.

The World Health Organization has noted a similar trend worldwide. While young people who contract COVID-19 often dont get as sick as members of more vulnerable populations do, they are amplifying the spread of the virus through their interactions with a larger number of people.

In recent weeks, Montana has experienced its largest outbreak since the beginning of the pandemic. Since that July press conference, the states death toll from COVID-19 has more than tripled to 165 deaths as of Sept. 24. The total number of recorded cases statewide has increased from 3,676 to 11,242 in that same span.

The outbreak has been significantly driven by students returning to school and by young people in their 20s and 30s.

Over the past two weeks, there has been a 50% increase in cases afflicting people from age 20 to 39, said Stacey Anderson, lead epidemiologist for the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services. They have mostly been infected during attendance at social events, including parties, family gatherings and going to bars, Anderson said.

Aware that young people are a significant vector of COVIDs spread, health departments across Montana have implemented a variety of strategies to help reach young people with information about the virus spread, from social media marketing to distribution of masks and sanitizing equipment on college campuses to placing ubiquitous public health messages at bars. The operative theory, based on successful past public health campaigns, is that public health officials have to reach their target audience where they are. Examples include distributing free condoms on college campuses, helping hairstylists recognize signs of domestic violence and teaching barbers how to educate customers about colon cancer and sexually transmitted infections.

In general, though, reaching young people especially those who arent gathered in institutions like colleges or the military is difficult. A 2015 review by the National Academy of Sciences found that there is limited evidence on these difficult-to-reach populations and on what strategies may be most effective in engaging them so they are better able to recognize and care about the potential risks they create or encounter.

Additionally, the review found that public health campaigns can be less likely to benefit people who are economically or educationally disadvantaged.

Younger people are the ones who attend weddings. Weve had several outbreaks associated with weddings. Or theyre service workers. We found they hang out together after work, and go out and socialize at bars and have parties, Flathead City-County Health Officer Tamalee St. James Robinson said.

She later added: Im not sure how you reach them. Social media has been our best attempt. Facebook, stuff like that. I dont know, theyre a hard group to reach.

SOCIAL MEDIA

One of the most effective ways to reach younger people, the National Academy of Sciences review found, is social media. Public health officials in both Gallatin and Flathead counties said social media has been a target of their outreach efforts.

Whitney Bermes, a spokeswoman for Gallatin County, said the department has used age-targeted Spotify and YouTube ads to get its messages across. Flathead County is focusing on Facebook, Robinson said.

Barbara Schneeman, a spokeswoman for RiverStone Health in Yellowstone County, said the county is also developing a social media plan aimed at young adults. In Missoula, the health department has created YouTube videos to provide updates on the virus as it spreads, with the videos racking up hundreds of views.

Recruiting celebrity spokespeople has also been a focus for outreach campaigns across the state. Football coaches at Montana State and the University of Montana participated in a public service announcement for the states Mask Up Montana campaign. Actor and part-time Montana resident Jeff Bridges delivered a 30-second digital public service announcement for the Montana Hospital Association. At the national level, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci went on the popular Barstool Sports podcast aimed at young people and was interviewed for a cover story in InStyle Magazine.

BAR OUTREACH AND THE SERVICE INDUSTRY

Bars are also increasingly considered hotspots for transmission of COVID-19. With both service workers and bar clientele tending to be younger, such public gathering spaces are likely contributing to the spread of COVID-19 among people in their 20s and 30s, said Park County Health Officer Dr. Laurel Desnick.

Park County recently conducted an analysis of contact tracing data that shows how and where cases are spreading in the county. The results were unsurprising, Desnick said. Bars were one of the main locations where COVID is being spread.

Developmentally, this is the age group that is more social. It makes sense they are the ones that are free to be out. This is the way this society works, Desnick said.

Nick Chinman, a salesman at Bronkens Distributing in Bozeman, has worked with bars in Gallatin County to create universal signage encouraging people to take measures to protect themselves, such as wearing masks and maintaining social distancing. Chinman, who works in both Bozeman and Big Sky, said many Bozeman bars told him they were serving very few locals. He said he took the signage idea from the Chamber of Commerce in Big Sky, where his clients were reporting more local business.

Together with people including Mike Hope, owner of the Rocking R Bar in Bozeman, they created consistent signage, including handouts to put on tables encouraging people to keep six feet apart and a banner over Main Street.

Hope said the bar had to shut down for two weeks in July after an outbreak among staff. He said he sees his workers, as well as workers from other bars in downtown Bozeman, spending time together hanging out after work.

Sometimes theyre the customer too, when theyre not working, Hope said.

Hope said he is taking precautions to try to make the bar safer during the pandemic. The Rocking Rs occupancy level is normally 312 people, but the bar is now limiting its capacity to 75. The business today works like this: Wait at the door to be seated. Wear your mask until you get to your seat or table. If youre sitting at the bar, you must be at least two barstools away from the next party.

EFFECTS ON YOUNG PEOPLE

One part of the message that should be stressed is that COVID-19 can be a serious disease even for young people, Schneeman said.

Yellowstone County has seen at least one death of a person in their 30s. Statewide, three people in their 30s have died of COVID-19.

This is a disease that younger people can also die from, Schneeman said.

Robinson said one of the main difficulties in reaching younger people is that they think they wont get sick.

Its just a really hard population. They see themselves as invincible, Robinson said.

But young adults are not immune to the effects of COVID-19, studies have increasingly shown. About one-third of young adults age 18 to 25 are medically vulnerable to COVID-19, with pre-existing conditions like obesity and hypertension leading to adverse effects, according to a July study from the University of California San Francisco.

More than half of people who are infected with COVID-19 develop lung deformities, and up to 20% of people who become sick with the disease develop long-term heart damage. Once they are in hospital, young adults age 18 to 34 are twice as likely to die from COVID-19 as from a heart attack, according to a recent Harvard study.

DEFINITELY SEEING WORKPLACE SPREAD

Yellowstone County has had the largest outbreak of COVID-19 in Montana, with 2,990 recorded cases as of Sept. 24. An analysis of August positive test results by RiverStone Health found that about 44% of Yellowstone County residents who were infected during that month did not report a known contact who tested positive for COVID-19, Schneeman said.

Of that 44%, the most common shared characteristic is that 64% had been to work outside the home. A little more than half had been shopping, while only 27% had patronized a restaurant or bar.

Were definitely seeing workplace spread, Schneeman said.

Among the most vulnerable are front-line workers who interact with the public. That includes bartenders, who serve unmasked customers sitting at a bar and facing them for long periods of time, Robinson said.

In Park County, the health department surveyed people at a community-wide testing event in June about their COVID-19 circumstances in order to get a read on community attitudes. Nearly a third of respondents said they continue to work even though they dont feel safe at their jobs, Desnick said.

That attitude has been especially pronounced in the service industry, Desnick said. Park County set up surveillance testing of tourist-facing businesses near Yellowstones northern entrance. During that ongoing testing, many workers have reported that they dont feel safe interacting with tourists from across the country hour after hour, day after day, she said.

At the same time, its common for young service workers at restaurants and bars to socialize over drinks after work or visit co-workers homes to wind down after their shifts, increasing the risk of viral spread, Desnick said.

Its just a very hard needle to thread, Desnick said. Were asking them to go to work in very vulnerable places, and were blaming them for being vulnerable in the rest of their lives.

Robinson said its just part of being young.

Theyre just a social entity of society, and theyre going to find a way to be social, Robinson said.

Desnick said she doesnt blame the workers, who have little choice but to continue working during the pandemic.

Its hard to maintain good judgment in a pressure cooker, she said.

To see what else is happening in Gallatin County subscribe to the online paper.

See more here:

As young adults seed the spread of COVID-19, health messaging targets them - The Bozeman Daily Chronicle

Tracking COVID-19 in Alaska: 6 deaths and 128 new cases reported on Friday – Anchorage Daily News

September 27, 2020

We're making this important information about the pandemic available without a subscription as a public service. But we depend on reader support to do this work. Please consider joining others in supporting independent journalism in Alaska for just $3.23 a week.

The state on Friday reported six new deaths and 128 new cases of COVID-19, according to the Department of Health and Social Services COVID-19 dashboard.

The newly reported deaths included a man in his 60s from Anchorage who died recently, according to a statement sent out by DHSS on Friday.

According to DHSS, the five other deaths were identified as COVID-19 deaths by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Preventions National Center for Health Statistics, which reviews and codes all death certificates across the country and may identify COVID-19 deaths that were not immediately reported to the state.

They included an Anchorage man in his 60s who died in July; a Fairbanks man in his 60s who died in August; an Anchorage man in his 50s who died in August; a man in his 70s from a smaller community in the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area who died in August; and a Soldotna man in his 70s who died while he was out of state.

In total, 52 Alaskans have died with COVID-19 since the pandemic began here in March.

While Alaskas death rate remains among the lowest in the country, Friday saw the highest number of deaths reported by the state in a single day. The previous high occurred on Aug. 25, when the state reported the deaths of four Anchorage residents.

Statewide as of Friday, 39 people were hospitalized with COVID-19 while four other hospital patients were awaiting test results, according to state data. Of Alaskas 153 intensive care unit beds, 85 were in use statewide. Fourteen people with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infections were on ventilators as of Friday afternoon.

Active cases of COVID-19 among Alaska residents fell from 4,519 on Thursday to 4,424 on Friday. According to state data, there are also 684 active cases among nonresidents.

Of the new cases, it wasnt clear how many people were showing symptoms of the virus when they tested positive.

Of the 127 new cases of COVID-19 involving residents, there were 68 new cases in Anchorage; 22 in Fairbanks; nine in North Pole; six in Juneau; three in Chugiak; three in Utqiagvik; two in Eagle River; two in Kotzebue; one in Soldotna; one in Delta Junction; one in Palmer; one in Wasilla; and one in Bethel.

Among communities smaller than 1,000 not identified to protect confidentiality, there was one new case in the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area; three in the Nome Census Area; two in the Bethel Census Area; and one in Bristol Bay.

The only new nonresident case was in Anchorage.

The states testing positivity rate as of Friday was 2.31% over a seven-day rolling average.

Editors note: This story has been updated to reflect changes to state data that resolved discrepancies in the number of Alaskans who have died with COVID-19.

Follow this link:

Tracking COVID-19 in Alaska: 6 deaths and 128 new cases reported on Friday - Anchorage Daily News

Page 734«..1020..733734735736..740750..»