Category: Covid-19

Page 705«..1020..704705706707..710720..»

COVID-19: City of Lubbock reports a record 750 new cases, 1 additional death on Sunday – KLBK | KAMC | EverythingLubbock.com

November 16, 2020

by: News Release & Posted By Staff | newsweb@everythinglubbock.com

(Nexstar Media Group/EverythingLubbock.com Staff)

LUBBOCK, Texas (NEWS RELEASE) The following is a news release from the City of Lubbock:

As of 4:00 p.m. on Sunday, November 15, 2020, the City of Lubbock confirmed 750 new cases of Coronavirus (COVID-19), 412 recoveries and 1 additional death. The total number of cases in Lubbock County is 25,820: 4,881 active, 20,666 listed as recovered and 273 total deaths.

*Since the 4:00 PM cutoff, there were 32 additional cases reported or transferred in to Lubbock. These cases are adjusted into the cumulative totals.

As of 4:00 p.m. there are a combined 13 open hospital beds and 15 patients holding for beds at University Medical Center and Covenant Health System. Note that this reflects staffed beds open to receive patients and differs from the available bed count shown on the DSHS and the City of Lubbock dashboards. These dashboards count all available beds, including specialty beds, such as pediatrics, PICU, outpatient, psychiatric and others, as well as hospitalized patients in the 22 county Trauma Service Area.

Lubbock remains above the 15% threshold where the percentage of COVID-19 confirmed patients in regional hospitals as a percentage of available hospital beds. The most recent number is 24.81%. Trauma Service Area B will remain under the additional restrictions outlined under Governor Abbotts Executive Orders until we remain below 15% for seven consecutive days.

Executive Orders 31 and 32 can be found heremylubbock.info/ga-31or heremylubbock.info/ga-32

The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) maintains a dashboard with state, regional, and county level COVID-19 statistics and can be found heremylubbock.info/dshs-covid

Local COVID-19 statistics can be found heremylubbock.info/covid

(News release from the City of Lubbock)

See the article here:

COVID-19: City of Lubbock reports a record 750 new cases, 1 additional death on Sunday - KLBK | KAMC | EverythingLubbock.com

Cities And States Are Imposing New COVID-19 Restrictions. Experts Say It’s Not Enough – NPR

November 16, 2020

Medical workers wearing personal protective equipment register people in vehicles at a drive-through coronavirus testing site Monday in El Paso, Texas. Joel Angel Juarez/Bloomberg via Getty Images hide caption

Medical workers wearing personal protective equipment register people in vehicles at a drive-through coronavirus testing site Monday in El Paso, Texas.

Coronavirus cases are surging across the U.S., prompting many state and local leaders to impose new restrictions. But some experts say these efforts may be too little, too late like a Band-Aid on a bullet wound.

The virus is spreading unchecked through communities in nearly every state, and new cases topped 150,000 for the first time on Friday, according to Johns Hopkins University. The U.S. is expected to continue breaking records as temperatures drop, bringing people into closer quarters indoors.

"It's a very daunting problem, to control the numbers of cases that we're seeing right now with these kinds of minor efforts," said Andrew Pekosz, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Johns Hopkins University.

The new restrictions have sprung up rapidly in recent weeks. For example, Massachusetts imposed a statewide curfew. Indoor operations for restaurants are not allowed in many counties in California and Connecticut, and part of Montana prohibits indoor dining after 10 p.m., while New York is limiting indoor and outdoor gatherings to 10 people. Chicago is asking residents not to have guests in their homes and cancel Thanksgiving celebrations.

The Denver area is under curfew overnight with few exceptions. Local authorities are trying to avoid imposing a stay-at-home order, even though they have said cases are "substantially above" rates that would merit one.

"The restrictions might seem uncomfortable, but we believe that they are one of our last best hopes to slow the spread of COVID-19 in our community without the necessity of Adams County moving to the Stay at Home orders that we had in the spring," said Dr. John Douglas Jr., executive director of the Denver area's health department.

An electronic overhead sign in downtown Denver on Monday reminds residents to follow a curfew put into effect to curb the spread of the coronavirus. David Zalubowski/AP hide caption

Pekosz, who has studied emerging viruses for more than 20 years, said these are steps in the right direction. But he questioned whether these minor changes will be enough to control the virus.

He said there would be two basic strategies that would be effective and we're seeing neither at this point. Coronavirus restrictions, he said, "either have to be incredibly widespread everybody has to do it across the country to see this downtick or we have to go to more strict measures that target the events that we think are driving the spread of cases right now."

Thanksgiving, one of the busiest travel periods of the year, could exacerbate the spread of the virus. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is projecting 260,000 to 282,000 deaths in the U.S. by Dec. 5. Experts are also looking with concern to the rest of the upcoming holiday season.

The country is in unfamiliar territory, Pekosz said.

Beth Blauer, executive director and co-founder of the Centers for Civic Impact at Johns Hopkins, is hoping to aid leaders in combating the virus. She has been collecting data and crunching numbers to help cities, states and federal agencies make informed policy decisions.

It's not just the complacency of individuals driving the death toll higher and higher, Blauer said. Unfettered movement between cities and states and conflicting messages and guidelines from leaders fueled the rising case counts.

"If there isn't something that's more consistent, either at a regional or national level, you really are not going to realize the kind of gains that you need to see in order to actually stop what's happening right now," she said.

"We are in a full upward swing that requires like a pretty comprehensive approach," Blauer added, saying she doesn't expect that before President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in. "The sad part about it is we're not going to get that at least until January, which means that a lot of people are going to die."

However, neither Blauer nor Pekosz said they believe the U.S. has to revert back to a lockdown status to stop the spread. In fact, they both said society can still turn the tide with limited government intervention. The key is wearing a mask.

"Not only does a mask protect you as the individual, it also protects all the people around you," Blauer said. "It is one of the most essential public health interventions that we have."

With cases still on the rise and the holiday season rapidly approaching, Blauer and Pekosz advise people to get creative with their festivities and do their best to avoid gatherings. It has been a tough year, Blauer said, but this is not the time to lose sight of the big picture.

"There is a light at the end of the tunnel. We had tremendous news [Monday] around vaccine development," she said, with the company Pfizer reporting promising results from a clinical trial.

Even if the U.S. can avoid new lockdowns, Blauer added, leaders will likely "have to make some hard decisions in the short term so that we can all get to a place in the long term where we yearn to be."

More:

Cities And States Are Imposing New COVID-19 Restrictions. Experts Say It's Not Enough - NPR

Determining who gets the first COVID-19 vaccines, while swaying minds of those who decline – The Boston Globe

November 16, 2020

From Boston to Springfield, advocates and health organizations are launching listening sessions. Some are surveying their communities to identify trusted local leaders who can help communicate reliable information about coronavirus and counter rumors and fears. But they face a daunting prospect as many communities that have shouldered a disproportionate share of coronavirus illness and deaths also harbor deep-rooted suspicions stemming from years of discriminatory treatment by physicians and researchers.

In Boston, the Roxbury Presbyterian Church is hosting none other than the nations top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, in a Zoom event later this month about grappling with health, equity, access, and trust during the pandemic.

I was a little surprised that so many people in my community dont trust this vaccine," said Rev. Liz Walker, church pastor and a member of Governor Charlie Bakers COVID-19 Vaccine Advisory Group. I am talking to parishioners to try and get people the real information and then they can make wise choices."

The drug maker giant Pfizer raised optimism last week when it announced preliminary trial results indicating its vaccine may be 90 percent effective against COVID-19. If it gets federal approval, the company said, it intends to distribute enough doses to immunize 15 million to 20 million people by the end of December.

In its latest vaccine distribution plan, the Baker administration expects to receive between 20,000 and 60,000 doses in the first batch. The state intends to prioritize workers who have direct or indirect exposure to COVID-19 patients or infectious materials in hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care settings. Next in line would be essential workers and people with underlying medical conditions at risk for severe COVID-19 illness, including those over 65.

The states blueprint doesnt indicate priority vaccination for such hard-hit communities of color as Lawrence and Chelsea but pledges that the planning will be completed with a social equity lens to ensure those who are prioritized reflect the most vulnerable.

To get an idea of just how many health care workers are thought likely to be vulnerable because of exposure to COVID-19 on the job, consider Baystate Health in Springfield, the largest health care system in Western Massachusetts, with over 12,000 employees. Dr. Mark Keroack, Baystates president, estimates half of those workers are at risk.

We have looked at direct care givers, people who lay hands on patients the doctors and nurses, Keroack said. But it also involves people bringing in the food trays and cleaning the rooms. People who transport patients would be in that group as well.

In early October, the Baker administration assembled the 17-member vaccine advisory group, composed of public health and medical experts, community leaders, and elected officials for guidance on communication, distribution, and equity issues. The administration acknowledged, in its recent vaccine report to federal regulators, the uphill climb it anticipates in persuading some immigrant, Black, and Latinx communities the vaccines will be safe.

Walker said she joined the group because, as a person of color, she feels a responsibility to learn as much she can about the vaccines and share it with her community.

We cant just say I wont do it without at least knowing what the real information is," she said. "We are living in a time with so many rumors and outright lies, and I am going to try my hardest to get at the facts and my way to do that is to be at the table.

Kate Reilly, a spokeswoman for the states COVID-19 Command Center, declined to say whether the Baker administration will mandate that residents get a vaccine, as it did with flu shots this season for workers in nursing homes, assisted living centers, rest homes, and dialysis centers, where vaccination rates are historically low. The mandate seeks to head off a devastating twindemic of flu and COVID-19.

Dr. Asif Merchant, medical director at four nursing homes in the Metro West area and chief of geriatric medicine at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, said the flu shot mandate has significantly boosted vaccination rates. But its an open question whether that will translate to more buy-in for COVID-19 vaccines.

I see a mix of staff members who want the [COVID-19] vaccine as soon as possible and some who say what if its not safe and it could be dangerous," said Merchant, also a member of the governors advisory group.

Merchant said many nursing home workers have been devastated by the magnitude of death and disease theyve witnessed in the pandemic and that may help sway acceptance of a vaccine.

We need to amplify that to say this is for the greater good," he said. But there will need to be a lot of education.

A higher hurdle will likely be among the states homeless, who would not be prioritized in the first batch of vaccines under the states plan, although elderly homeless people who are at risk for severe complications from COVID-19 could be considered in the second phase. During the first peak of the pandemic, a third of homeless people in Boston were found to be infected.

Last flu season, about 3,500 homeless Boston residents, roughly half the citys estimated homeless population, agreed to get the flu shot, said Dr. Denise De Las Nueces, medical director of Bostons Health Care for the Homeless Program.

Gaining acceptance for the COVID-19 vaccine, she said, will be unchartered territory.

To better address gaping inequities surrounding the virus, the Baker administration recently launched a 62-question survey and asked community groups statewide to share it with residents. The survey inquires about race, ethnicity, education, income, and gender identity and asks where respondents seek the most reliable and up-to-date information about COVID-19 and whether they believe their community is receiving adequate support to prevent infections and bolster those who have lost work during the pandemic.

The states vaccine distribution plan indicates the Baker administration will rely on the dozens of community health centers across Massachusetts to help bridge the gap in trust with many neighborhoods.

Michael Curry, the incoming chief executive of the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, said YMCAs, churches, and local groups within its "community health ecosystem'' are banding together to hold listening and learning sessions about the vaccine.

Recognizing that each community is different and that doubts borne of discrimination run deep, they are asking at each stop whom residents trust as authority figures.

Is it your bishop? Your minister? Your local Dr. Anthony Fauci? Curry said. A lot of children educate parents in first-generation immigrant families. We should be educating those children on the vaccines.

Dr. Dean Xerras, medical director of Massachusetts General Hospitals Chelsea Healthcare Center, sees a ray of hope. Convincing residents, many of whom are immigrants uncomfortable with the health care system, to get flu shots each year is a struggle. But this year, he is seeing something different.

I have had people say, This is probably the only year I am going to get a flu shot, " Xerras said. I think people were so devastated by coronavirus, at least families I have talked to, that patients who have not gotten flu shots in the past are willing to get a coronavirus vaccine.

Kay Lazar can be reached at kay.lazar@globe.com Follow her on Twitter @GlobeKayLazar.

See the original post here:

Determining who gets the first COVID-19 vaccines, while swaying minds of those who decline - The Boston Globe

N.J. sets another new record with 4,540 positive COVID-19 tests. Alarming, Gov. Murphy tweets. – NJ.com

November 16, 2020

For the second day in a row, New Jersey hit a record number of new daily coronavirus cases, with 4,540 new cases reported on Sunday. An additional 18 deaths were also reported.

Both Saturday and Sunday saw daily new case numbers higher than those seen in April, during the height of the first wave of the pandemic.

These numbers are ALARMING and continue to rise. Take this seriously. Wear a mask. Social distance. Stay safe, Gov. Phil Murphy said in a Sunday afternoon tweet reporting the numbers.

As we begin the holiday season, plan accordingly and keep social distancing and safety in mind, Murphy said. We MUST redouble our efforts and crush the curve like we did last spring. Our lives literally depend on it.

As of Saturday, the seven-day average for new cases was 3,198, up 50% from a week ago and 258% higher than a month ago. Thats also the highest seven-day average since April 28.

However, it is difficult to directly compare cases from April to now because there were far fewer tests being done in the spring when supplies and testing sites were more limited. It is likely the virus was more rampant in April.

The positivity rate for tests conducted on Monday, the most recent day available, was 8.06%, down from more than 10% over the weekend. The positivity rate remained below 4% throughout the summer.

The state has now had 279,274 positive tests and 16,566 deaths 14,765 confirmed and 1,801 probable fatalities since the outbreak began in March.

Before this weekend, the single-day high for positive tests was 4,391 on April 17, when New Jersey hit the peak of the outbreaks first wave. At the time, though, tests were in short supply. The state has more than doubled its testing capacity since the spring.

Its possible the current numbers are 10 to 20% higher than those being reported by the state because rapid tests are not included in the daily reports, health officials have said.

As the second wave takes hold, some restrictions have been re-implemented after they were lifted over the summer.

Restaurants and bars have been ordered to close indoor dining by 10 p.m. and the governor signed an executive order this week that allows towns to close nonessential business by 8 p.m.

Murphy and the governors of five other northeastern states are meeting this weekend to discuss possibly coordinating new restrictions to address the spike in COVID-19 cases as a second wave of the coronavirus grips the region. Those scheduled to attend the virtual summit include the governors of New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Vermont.

Medical personnel put on safety gear before testing begins at the Union County drive thru coronavirus testing at Kean University in Union in July.Ed Murray | NJ Advance Media for

CORONAVIRUS RESOURCES: Live map tracker | Newsletter | Homepage

While cases hit a new high on Sunday, deaths still remain well below where they were in mid-April, when more than 400 people in the state were dying each day.

Part of this is because hospitals have improved treatment for COVID-19, health officials have said. The hospitals are also not as crowded as they were in the spring, though those numbers are also surging again.

State data shows that 2,004 people are currently hospitalized with coronavirus, with 135 people on ventilators. That is the highest number of hospitalizations since June 2.

During the peak of the first wave in April, more than 8,000 people were in New Jersey hospitals fighting the virus.

The statewide rate of transmission increased to 1.38 much lower than when it was above 5 toward the end of March, but still the highest since the summer. Any rate above 1 means the outbreak is expanding.

North Jersey counties are recording the most new cases, led by Hudson County with 413 new cases reported Saturday. Camden and Bergen counties recorded 400 and 397 new cases, respectively. All but six counties reported at least 100 new cases.

COVID-19 cases are surging all over the country. The United States recorded more than 180,000 new cases on Friday, by far the largest number of new daily cases seen during the pandemic. Nearly 1,400 people died from the virus nationwide on Friday.

COUNTY-BY-COUNTY NUMBERS (sorted by most new)

HOSPITALIZATIONS

On Sunday, there were 2,004 patients in hospitals confirmed or suspected to have COVID-19, up 4 from Saturday.

New Jersey has 392 people in intensive care (22 more than on Saturday) and 135 people on ventilators (up one from Saturday).

The state said 231 COVID-19 patients were discharged from the hospital on Saturday.

TRANSMISSION RATE

The states transmission rate has climbed to 1.38 on Saturday, up from 1.35 on Friday. Thats up from a recent low of 1.13 on Oct. 20.

A rate of 1.38 means that 100 people with the virus will transmit it to 138 people.

Over time, that means the virus is growing among the population.

SCHOOL CASES

Since the start of the school year, at least 193 New Jersey students and educators have either contracted COVID-19 or passed it on to someone else while in the classroom, walking around their schools or participating in extracurricular activities, state officials said.

The 193 cases were part of 51 confirmed school outbreaks that local health investigations concluded were the result of students and teachers catching the coronavirus at school.

GLOBAL NUMBERS

As of Saturday afternoon, there have been more than 54 million positive COVID-19 tests across the globe, according to a running tally by Johns Hopkins University. More than 1.3 million people have died from coronavirus-related complications.

The United States has the most positive tests in the world, with 10.9 million, and the most deaths, with more than 245,600.

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to NJ.com.

Katie Kausch may be reached at kkausch@njadvancemedia.com. Tell us your coronavirus story or send a tip here.

See original here:

N.J. sets another new record with 4,540 positive COVID-19 tests. Alarming, Gov. Murphy tweets. - NJ.com

12 deaths, 155 hospitalized since yesterday due to COVID-19 in Wisconsin – WKOW

November 16, 2020

MADISON (WKOW) -- There were 12 deaths due to COVID-19 in the past day and 155 people were newly-hospitalized, according to the latest numbers from the Wisconsin Department of Health Services.

There have been 6,058 positive COVID-19 tests since yesterday and 11,919 new negative tests.

As of Saturday afternoon, 2,034COVID-19 patientswere being treated in Wisconsin hospitals, a decline for the third day in a row. Of those, 435 are in the ICU, no change from the day before,according to the Wisconsin Hospital Association.

(CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL DHS DASHBOARD)

The Department of Health Servicesdashboardshows the seven-day average of both positive tests by day and test by person.(CHART)

(App users, see the daily reports and charts HERE.)

The 12 deaths have raised the total of those killed by the disease in Wisconsin to 2,637 people (0.8 percent of positive cases).

Of all positive cases reported since the pandemic began, 240,075 or 76.9 percent, are considered recovered.

DHS now has a county-level dashboard to assess the COVID-19 activity levelin counties and Healthcare Emergency Readiness Coalition regions that measure what DHS calls the burden in each county.View the dashboard HERE.

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services updates the statistics each dayon its website around 2 p.m.

(Our entire coronavirus coverage is available here.)

The new strain of the coronavirus causes the disease COVID-19. Symptoms include cough, fever and shortness of breath. A full list of symptoms is available onthe Centers for Disease Control website.

In severe cases, pneumonia can develop. Those most at risk include the elderly, people with heart or lung disease as well as anyone at greater risk of infection.

For most, the virus is mild, presenting similarly to a common cold or the flu.

Anyone who thinks they may have the disease should call ahead to a hospital or clinic before going in for a diagnosis. Doing so gives the staff time to take the proper precautions so the virus does not spread.

Those needing emergency medical services should continue to use 911.

(County by county results are available here).

See the original post here:

12 deaths, 155 hospitalized since yesterday due to COVID-19 in Wisconsin - WKOW

As Coronavirus Hospitalizations Surge, Which States Are Getting Hit The Worst? : Shots – Health News – NPR

November 16, 2020

Surging hospitalizations are straining health care systems around the United States. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images hide caption

Surging hospitalizations are straining health care systems around the United States.

Updated Wednesday 1:20 p.m. ET

Seriously ill COVID-19 patients are starting to fill up hospital beds in record numbers, and health care workers are bracing for even more patients to come in the wake of skyrocketing coronavirus infections. But the burden on hospitals is not evenly spread. Some communities, particularly in the West and Midwest are particularly hard-hit.

As of Wednesday, nearly 62,000 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized around the country, surpassing the highs of the midsummer and spring surges. This is double the numbers hospitalized as of late September.

"We have legitimate reason to be very, very concerned about our health system at a national level," says Lauren Sauer, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at Johns Hopkins University who studies hospital surge capacity.

The spring and summer waves of COVID-19 hospitalizations were concentrated largely in a handful of cities in the Northeast and parts of the South.

With the virus now surging across the country, experts warn that the impact of this next wave of hospitalizations will be even more devastating and protracted.

"I fear that we're going to have multiple epicenters," says Dr. Mahshid Abir, an emergency physician at the University of Michigan and researcher at the Rand Corp. who has developed a model that helps hospitals manage surge capacity.

If that happens, Abir warns that there won't be flexibility to shuffle around resources to the places in need because everywhere will be overwhelmed.

The impact varies state by state with certain areas showing much more rapid increases in hospitalizations. As of Monday, hospitalizations are rising in 47 states, according to data collected by The COVID Tracking Project, and 22 states are seeing their highest numbers of COVID-19 hospitalizations since the pandemic began.

Where are hospitals at risk of maxing out?

With the numbers growing nearly everywhere, the key question for hospital leaders and policymakers is, when is a community on the brink of having more patients than it can handle?

In parts of the Midwest and the West, hospitals are already brushing up against their capacity to deliver care. Some are struggling to find room for patients, even in large urban hospitals that have more beds.

But the surge in hospitalizations is not evenly spread and hospitals' capacity for weathering case surges varies greatly.

One way to gauge the growing stress on a health care system is by tracking the share of hospital beds occupied by COVID-19 patients.

The federal department of Health and Human Services tracks and publishes this data at the state (but not the local) level. Several experts NPR spoke to say that, though imperfect, this is one of the best metrics communities have to work with.

Though there's not a fixed threshold that applies to all hospitals, generally speaking, once COVID-19 hospitalizations exceed 10% of all available beds, that signals an increasing risk that the health care system could soon be overwhelmed, explains Sauer.

"We start to pay attention above 5%," says Sauer. "Above that, 10% is where we think, 'Perhaps we have to start enacting surge strategies and crisis standards of care in some places.'"

Crisis standards of care is a broad term for how to prioritize medical treatment when resources are scarce. In the most extreme cases, that can lead to rationing of care based on a patient's chance of survival.

The latest data from HHS shows that in 18 states mostly in the Midwest COVID-19 hospitalizations have already climbed above 10%.

Seven states are over 15%, including North Dakota and South Dakota, which are now over 20%.

Hospital capacity is flexible ... until it's not

The percentage of hospital beds taken up by COVID-19 patients does not tell a complete story about hospital capacity, says Sauer, but it's a starting point.

Hospital capacity is not so much a static number, but an ever-shifting balance of resources. "It's space, staff and stuff, and you need all three, and if you don't have one, it doesn't matter if you have the other two," says Abir.

The level of COVID-19 hospitalizations that would be a crisis in one place might not be in another. Still, a growing share of beds occupied by COVID-19 patients can be a strong signal that the health care system is headed for trouble.

COVID-19 patients can be more labor intensive because health care workers have to follow intricate protocols around personal protective equipment and infection control. And some of the patients take up ICU space.

"When the numbers go up like that, particularly for critical care, that strains the system pretty significantly," says Abir. "This is a scarce resource. Critical care nurses are scarce. Ventilators are scarce. Respiratory therapists are scarce."

In Utah, where the share of hospitalized COVID-19 patients is about 8%, state health officials have already warned that hospitals may soon be forced to ration care because of limited ICU space.

There is no "magic number" to indicate when a health care system may be overwhelmed, says Eugene Litvak, who is CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Optimization and helps advise hospitals on how to manage their capacity. But hospitals must be alert to rapid increases in patient load.

"Even a 10% increase can be quite dangerous," says Litvak. "If you are a hospital that's half empty, you can tolerate it." But U.S. hospitals generally run close to capacity, Litvak says, with above 90% of beds already full especially toward the end of the week.

"Imagine that 10% of extremely sick patients on top of that," he says. "What are your options? You can not admit ambulances and patients with non-COVID medical needs, or you have to cancel your elective surgeries."

In the spring, some states ordered that most elective surgeries come to a halt so that hospitals had room for COVID-19 patients, but Litvak says this leads to all kinds of collateral damage because patients don't get the care they need and hospitals lose money and lay off staff.

State data may miss local hot spots

Statewide COVID-19 hospitalization metrics mask huge variations within a state. Certain health care systems or metro areas may be in crisis.

"It's very valuable information, but a state average can be misleading," says Ali Mokdad with the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, which projects that many states will face big problems with hospital capacity this winter. "It doesn't tell you where in the states it's happening."

Big urban centers may be much better equipped to absorb a rush of patients than smaller towns.

In New York City, Mount Sinai Health System was able to more than double its bed capacity during the spring surge. Other communities don't have the ability to ramp up capacity so quickly.

"Especially the states that don't have major cities with major hospitals, you see a lot of stress on them," Mokdad says.

But it's hard for researchers and health leaders to get a clear picture of what's happening regionally without good data, he adds. NPR has reported that the federal government does not share this local data, although it does collect it daily.

Some states publish their own hospital data sets. Texas, which shares the data in detail, provides a striking example. Statewide, COVID-19 hospitalizations have reached about 11%. Meanwhile, El Paso is above 40%, which has pushed the health care system to the brink.

Ultimately, it's difficult to know the true capacity for a region because many hospitals still don't coordinate well, says Dr. Christina Cutter, an emergency physician at the University of Michigan who collaborated on the Rand model with Abir.

"It's really hard to make sure you're leveraging all the resources and that one hospital is not overburdened compared to another hospital, and that may have unintended loss of life as a consequence," Cutter says.

Dire consequences of overfilled hospitals

During the height of Arizona's summer surge, COVID-19 patients filled nearly half of all beds in the state.

"When 50% of our hospital is doing COVID, it means the hospital is overloaded. It means that other services in that hospital are being delayed," says Mokdad. "The hospital becomes a nightmare."

Health care workers are pushed to their limits and are required to treat more patients at the same time. Hospitals can construct makeshift field hospitals to add to their capacity, but those can be logistically challenging and still require health care workers to staff the beds.

In Wisconsin, COVID-19 patients account for 17% of all hospitalizations, and many hospitals are warning that they are at or near capacity.

The Marshfield Clinic Health System, which runs nine hospitals in primarily rural parts of the state, is expecting its share of COVID-19 patients to double, if not more, by the end of the month.

"That will push us well beyond our staffing levels," says Dr. William Melms, chief medical officer at Marshfield. "We can always make more space, but creating the manpower to take care of our patients is the dilemma."

During earlier surges, many hospitals relied on bringing in hundreds or even thousands of out-of-state health care workers for backup, but Melms says that is not happening this time.

"We are on an island out here," he says.

An increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations statewide is also associated with higher mortality, according to a recent study that analyzed the relationship between COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths.

"It's an indicator that you're going to have more deaths from COVID as you see the numbers inch up in the hospital," says Pinar Karaca-Mandic, professor and academic director of the Medical Industry Leadership Institute at the University of Minnesota.

Specifically, Karaca-Mandic's research found that a 1% increase of COVID-19 patients in a state's ICU beds will lead to about 2.8 additional deaths in the next seven days.

She says a statewide level of 20% COVID-19 hospitalizations may not look all that alarming, but that number doesn't capture the constraints on the health care system in adding more ICU beds.

"That's not very flexible," she says. "It requires a lot of planning. It requires a lot of investments. So the more you fill up the ICU, the impact is going to be larger."

Sean McMinn produced the data vizualizations and contributed reporting to this piece.

See the original post:

As Coronavirus Hospitalizations Surge, Which States Are Getting Hit The Worst? : Shots - Health News - NPR

Letter: Public health guided by ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic – INFORUM

November 16, 2020

Public health has a code of 12 ethical principles which have guided behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, number 2 which says, Public health should achieve community health in a way that respects the rights of individuals in the community. Despite the rapidly changing and tumultuous circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic, local and national leaders have striven to strike the right balance between protecting the community while respecting the rights of individuals.

What has been lost on many people during COVID-19 is that consideration of the rights of individuals is not synonymous with giving people the freedom to do whatever they want. This ethical principle of protecting the community is built upon the concept of interdependence, which teaches that all the individual members of a community are dependent on one another for the common good, and that no single individual is an autonomous agent with unlimited freedom.

Part of the problem lies with people confusing medical ethics with public health ethics. Medical ethics places the autonomy of the individual patient first, and focuses on their needs. But under a pandemic, elected officials are required to make difficult decisions to protect the publics safety, and ensure the common good, but to do so cannot also confer unlimited autonomy upon individuals. Of course individuals still have a say in the decisions, and are able to give input through public hearings. But at the end of the day, the public needs to accept that public health officials are trying to do whats best for the majority. While it may not appear so in the short run, these measures are also what is best for the individuals in the long run, for the suppression of the pandemic and the minimization of morbidity and mortality resulting from it are the only pathways to a return to normalcy and a recovered economy.

RELATED

In implementing mitigation measures, public officials are striving for measures that are proportional to the magnitude of the harm to be prevented. So the magnitude of the harm that might come from having to grind through 18 months of uncertainty, justifies the same magnitude of lockdown necessary in the short term. This is in order to shrink the height of the epidemic peak (flattening the curve) to reduce the burden of disease, and to shorten the length of time that the pandemic rages so as to reduce the duration to less than say 18 months. If this can be accomplished, then the stringent mitigation measures implemented early are justified.

From the U.S. experience, it might easily be argued that an insufficient balance has been struck during COVID-19. It appears that excessive concern for individual freedoms, with lax mitigation measures, and premature lifting of these measures, has contributed to the prolongation and intensification of the pandemic, including many lost lives.

For the public to accept decisions made for the common good is to share in the community struggle by making individual sacrifices. Wearing a mask in public and maintaining social distancing are some of the least obtrusive measures to be taken, and allow a society to avoid the most obtrusive measures, such as shutting down businesses.

That some people consider the requirement to wear a mask to be a substantial sacrifice, and a violation of their individual liberty, when wearing a mask is done largely in service of protecting those who are vulnerable to the worst COVID outcomes the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions is unimaginable. Sacrificing individual liberty for benefit of others, even though it isnt ones personal preference, is a reflection of true virtue whether from humanistic or Christian motivations.

In summary, public health officials are not trammeling individual rights when they implement public-focused mitigation measures. These have been imposed only to the level that has been absolutely necessary. In so doing public health officials are using principles of reciprocity to minimize the burdens imposed on individuals and maximize the public benefit to be achieved. In so doing, they are simply obeying their professional public health code of ethics.

Strand lives in Fargo.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

See more here:

Letter: Public health guided by ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic - INFORUM

These charts show how serious this fall’s Covid-19 surge is in the US – CNN

November 13, 2020

Daily cases were dipping as recently as September, as the nation was bouncing back from a summer surge.

But infections roared back in a way not recorded before.

Thursday brought the United States' highest one-day infection total (above 153,000) and seven-day average for new daily infections (more than 131,000) on record, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

That average is more than 3.5 times higher than it was on September 12, when it was at a post-summer surge low of 34,198.

And it's well above the summer's highest seven-day average, which was around 67,100 on July 22.

But with colder weather potentially driving risky gatherings indoors, and no vaccine available this minute, experts warn daily infections have room to grow.

"It will not surprise me if in the next weeks we see over 200,000 new cases a day," Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told CNN on Monday.

'Most sensitive indicator' of infections is up

The country's test positivity rate averaged 8.7% over seven days as of early Thursday, according to the COVID Tracking Project.

That's above a summer's highest seven-day average of about 7.9% in mid-July.

Hospitals have more Covid patients than ever

About 65,300 coronavirus patients were in those facilities Wednesday, according to the COVID Tracking Project.

That's more than double the number from September 20, when the country was at post-summer-surge low of 28,608.

And it's beyond the summer peak of 59,718 on July 23, and the spring peak of 59,940 on April 15.

These hospitalization numbers prove that the current surge of Covid-19 cases is not merely the result of increased screening of asymptomatic people. Rather, the cases we're detecting are a leading indicator that many people are seriously ill," the post reads.

Seventeen states reported records for Covid-19 hospitalizations on Tuesday: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Wyoming, the tracking project said.

The hospitalization numbers likely have become more accurate over time -- Florida didn't report its hospitalizations until July 10, the COVID Tracking Project notes.

The toll of lives lost is climbing, too

The country's recent daily Covid-19 death tallies aren't in record territory, but they are shooting upward.

The average number of deaths per day, across a week, rose above 1,000 this week for the first time since the summer.

That average was 1,034 on Wednesday -- the highest since August 10, Johns Hopkins data shows. More than 1,380 deaths were reported on Wednesday alone.

That would recall the tallies seen early in the pandemic, when 2,000+ deaths were reported daily for a time in April. The highest daily average across a week was 2,241, on April 24.

But as hospitalizations break records, daily death rates could climb further.

CNN's Brandon Miller contributed to this report.

Read more from the original source:

These charts show how serious this fall's Covid-19 surge is in the US - CNN

Elon Musk says hes tested positive and negative for COVID-19 – The Verge

November 13, 2020

Elon Musk said Thursday night on Twitter that he has received mixed results after being tested for COVID-19 and is currently experiencing symptoms of a common cold. Musk says he was tested four times using a rapid antigen test: two tests came back positive and two came back negative. Hes also awaiting the results from two PCR tests but the results wont be known for 24 hours.

Antigen tests work by detecting a small protein on the surface of the coronavirus, whereas the more accurate PCR tests look for the virus itself. Antigen tests can be conducted quickly as they dont require a lab, and are often administered in hotspots like college campuses or elderly care facilities. Positive results from antigen tests are highly accurate, but there is a higher chance of false negatives, the FDA tells us, (Thats why PCR tests are ordered for confirmation.) One such antigen test from Quidel can detect the coronavirus 85 percent of the time. Musk says his antigen test came from BD.

Nevertheless, Musk, long a COVID-19 skeptic, questions the validity of the testing with just a hint of conspiracy.

In addition to saying something extremely bogus is going on, Musk implies that his experience is likely shared by others and contributing to the current spike in cases seen in the US and abroad. He also responded exactly to a tweet saying revenues from tests are likely not bogus.

Musk has been spreading doubt, confusion, and sometimes outright misinformation about the coronavirus. Hes accused doctors of inflating case numbers for financial reasons, promoted a widely discredited paper on the benefits of chloroquine, called shelter-in-place orders fascist, and dismissed panic associated with the pandemic as dumb. In March he predicted close to zero new cases by the end of April.

The US is currently seeing another spike in COVID-19 cases. Just a week after reporting 100,000 cases in a single day, public health officials reported a record 160,000 new cases on Thursday, November 12th, according to the New York Times. Hospitalizations for COVID-19 in the US also set a record of 67,096 on the same day, according to the COVID Tracking Project, with deaths rising to more than 1,000 on average each day.

Musk is the CEO of SpaceX, which is scheduled to launch its first official crewed mission for NASA on Saturday. Back in May, both Musk and NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine met with astronauts before they headed to space on a historic test mission. With Musks claim of a positive test, its not clear if that will happen this time.

When somebody tests positive for COVID, here at the Kennedy Space Center and across NASA it is our policy for that person to quarantine and self isolate. So we anticipate that will be taking place. Bridenstine said at a press event today when asked about Musks tweets. But its very early right now to know if any changes are necessary at this point. Bridenstine added. We just dont know.

Update 11:08 AM ET: Updated with comments from Bridenstine.

Go here to read the rest:

Elon Musk says hes tested positive and negative for COVID-19 - The Verge

China Is Vaccinating Thousands Against COVID-19 With Unapproved Vaccines : Goats and Soda – NPR

November 13, 2020

A staff member checks vaccines at a Beijing factory built by Sinovac to produce a COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine. Sinovac is one of 11 Chinese companies approved to carry out clinical trials of potential vaccines. Wang Zhao /AFP via Getty Images hide caption

A staff member checks vaccines at a Beijing factory built by Sinovac to produce a COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine. Sinovac is one of 11 Chinese companies approved to carry out clinical trials of potential vaccines.

One early November morning, a Peking duck cook, several construction workers and a software engineer patiently lined up outside a Beijing vaccine facility, awaiting their turn to be injected with a coronavirus vaccine still awaiting regulatory approval.

As countries around the world race to develop the first viable coronavirus vaccine, China's two biggest vaccine companies have already begun inoculating hundreds of thousands of mostly state workers in a bid to get a head start. But deploying unproven vaccines carries huge risks both for those receiving the vaccination and epidemic control efforts. The major worry is that vaccinations will give people who've had them a sense of invincibility that is not warranted and that could help spread the virus.

A vaccine may work to prevent bad outcomes from infection, but Jerome Kim, director-general of the International Vaccine Institute in Seoul, South Korea, warns that in some cases it may not prevent infection itself. "That could mean that a person could still transmit the virus after they've been vaccinated," he said.

But among those in China given preferential access to the experimental vaccine, the unorthodox approach is a sign of China's strength first in controlling a coronavirus epidemic, then in its ability to potentially protect its workers.

"There is no problem at all. Lots of our colleagues had the shot very early, as early as July," says Guo Peiyu, a construction worker for state behemoth China Railway Group. He is one of hundreds of workers being sent to the Democratic Republic of the Congo this month, where China Railway is building billions of dollars worth of roads in exchange for mineral mining rights.

Guo sees access to the vaccine as a perk that comes with his state job. "Your company is giving you a guarantee of safety in exchange for sending you abroad. After all, if you don't have your health, who cares how much money you earn?"

Not ready except for "emergency use"

China has four experimental vaccines developed by three companies now going through phase III human trials and safety testing before they can be approved for commercial use. Sinopharm and Sinovac, the two front-runners, have both stressed they are not ready to deploy their vaccines commercially.

"The vaccines developed by Sinopharm are in the final sprint, the last kilometer in a long march," said Liu Jingzhen, the company's chairman, said at a government press conference in October.

In reality, their vaccines had already been deployed months earlier this summer for "emergency use" and shot into the arms of people that China deems vulnerable to COVID-19, including front-line medical workers and critical service providers in large cities.

Sinovac has already set up several vaccination sites in China's coastal Zhejiang province where several hundred vaccine doses each day are sold first come first served for about RMB400 ($60) in out of pocket costs. Other countries are following suit; the Philippines says it will vaccinate up to 9 million people with Sinovac's product. The Brazilian state of Sao Paolo is conducting advanced human trials for Sinovac and intends to buy the vaccine once approved. Brazilian authorities temporarily suspended the trials this month however after an apparent suicide of one of the trial participants.

"Administering the vaccines through emergency use is a very necessary measure," Zheng Zhongwei, a director at China's CDC speaking at the same October press conference, explained. "The decision to approve emergency use came after rounds and rounds of strict debate and evaluation after relevant World Health Organization regulations were fulfilled."

Global health experts say that reasoning is flawed. "There is no emergency in China, because there are basically zero confirmed cases over many months already," says Jin Dong-Yan, who researches molecular virology at Hong Kong University.

As of November, Sinopharm said "hundreds of thousands" of people have been given its two-shot experimental vaccine and none had so far developed severe side effects beyond mild pain at the injection site. Many needing to be vaccinated were due to travel abroad for work, where coronavirus cases are still mounting, health authorities said earlier, but Sinopharm said only 56,000 vaccine recipients have gone abroad.

There are other risks, too. Antibodies from new vaccines in rare cases can be found to make things worse.

"I think the second question will be around something called enhanced respiratory disease," says Kim, referring to a form of lung disease that some animals developed after getting experimental vaccines for SARS, another coronavirus that infected 8,098 people from 2002 to 2004.

Beyond health, rolling out vaccines without all the data raises other risks for China. Already, a string of quality scandals over the years has people inside the country, and out, skittish about made-in-China drugs. If something goes wrong with these vaccines, it would be a disaster.

"If they chose to do this and they ruin their reputation, that will just make things worse and no one dare to use a Chinese vaccine anymore," says Hong Kong University's Jin.

So why take the risk and deploy unproven COVID-19 vaccines when there's no immediate scientific emergency? "It's more driven by commercial interests than by the public health needs, let me put it this way," says Yanzhong Huang, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Companies like Sinopharm will not have any pricing power once the vaccine is approved and formally rolled out; the government will control that. Right now, however, they can charge what they like and they are influential enough to persuade the government to leave open this window.

"We tend to think that this authoritarian state is making the decisions like a coherent, centralized process, but that is not the case in China," says Huang.

Early recipients

So who is eligible for early inoculation? Neither China's health regulators nor its two vaccine-makers have clarified how they determine who qualifies for the vaccine.

Within China, locking in a vaccination slot is still a coveted and limited commodity granted mostly to blue chip state firms. Sinopharm did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

At a November health conference, Liu, the Sinopharm chairman, said among those vaccinated were "state-owned enterprise workers sent to various overseas offices, Huawei's offices in 180 countries around the world and [China's] diplomats."

Outside the Beijing Institute of Biological Products, a Sinopharm subsidiary in charge of one of its two vaccines, an NPR reporter interviewed dozens of state employees waiting for their vaccination shots. Many said they worked for state-owned companies active in the Belt and Road, a Chinese global infrastructure initiative spanning the African continent and the Middle East.

"I need the vaccine. The pandemic is so bad outside China," said Cheng Litong, a construction worker for China Railway waiting for his second shot. "Now state workers already abroad are all lining up to get the vaccine when they return to China."

But some vaccine recipients NPR spoke to in Beijing included state-employed bureaucrats and office workers with no immediate plans to travel abroad.

"The company notified us new hires had to be vaccinated, so I came to Beijing," said Xiao Nan, an office administrator at a China Railway subsidiary based in China's northern Shandong province. He says he is baffled about why he needs vaccination, because his work does not require him to leave the country. "I was told it was for safety purposes," he said, shrugging.

Others have been turned away. In October, Chinese outlets reported students studying abroad could sign up for Sinopharm's coronavirus vaccine in Beijing and Wuhan, the port city where the epidemic first began. But the registration platform was taken down the next day, and those who had signed up were notified that Sinopharm could no longer provide the vaccine.

Amy Cheng contributed research from Beijing.

Read more:

China Is Vaccinating Thousands Against COVID-19 With Unapproved Vaccines : Goats and Soda - NPR

Page 705«..1020..704705706707..710720..»