Category: Covid-19

Page 57«..1020..56575859..7080..»

1 in 5 adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during pandemic – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

April 17, 2024

Basilico Studio Stock / iStock

A new study based on German data shows that SARS-CoV-2 caused a 21% excess of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) during the winter of 2022-23. The study was published this week in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases and suggests COVID-19 will add a significant burden during cold and flu seasons.

The study was based on answers to an online survey about ARIs during the past 7 months sent to 70,000 registered participants in a digital health study in March 2023. At that point, 3 years after the pandemic began, many people in Germany and elsewhere no longer regularly tested for COVID-19, or testing at home and did not report official results.

A total of 37,708 participants reported 54,813 ARIs, including 9,358 SARS-CoV-2 infections confirmed with either at-home or clinical tests. Twenty-eight percent10,638 peoplereported no infections.

There were 45,455 ARIs without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, the authors said. For 11,699 of those, no SARS-CoV-2 test was available, while the others had a negative test. The proportion of positive tests among all conducted tests was 21%.

The highest incidence for all ARIs was observed in December 2022, with 26 infections per 100 people. Adults aged 30 to 39 years had the highest cumulative incidence, with 208 infections per 100 people across the 7 months.

"Decision makers need to be aware of this burden to adapt and create new policies with the goal of reducing infection incidences, for example by establishing new strategies on vaccinations." the authors wrote.

Decision makers need to be aware of this burden to adapt and create new policies with the goal of reducing infection incidences

"While the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infections is reduced due to the achieved immunity in the population, we will likely face a higher burden of ARI than before the pandemic, even if no new SARS-CoV-2 variants will appear," the authors concluded. "This additional burden of ARI has to be considered particularly with respect to the implications for the work force."

See the rest here:

1 in 5 adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during pandemic - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

1 in 5 adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during pandemic – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

April 17, 2024

Basilico Studio Stock / iStock

A new study based on German data shows that SARS-CoV-2 caused a 21% excess of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) during the winter of 2022-23. The study was published this week in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases and suggests COVID-19 will add a significant burden during cold and flu seasons.

The study was based on answers to an online survey about ARIs during the past 7 months sent to 70,000 registered participants in a digital health study in March 2023. At that point, 3 years after the pandemic began, many people in Germany and elsewhere no longer regularly tested for COVID-19, or testing at home and did not report official results.

A total of 37,708 participants reported 54,813 ARIs, including 9,358 SARS-CoV-2 infections confirmed with either at-home or clinical tests. Twenty-eight percent10,638 peoplereported no infections.

There were 45,455 ARIs without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, the authors said. For 11,699 of those, no SARS-CoV-2 test was available, while the others had a negative test. The proportion of positive tests among all conducted tests was 21%.

The highest incidence for all ARIs was observed in December 2022, with 26 infections per 100 people. Adults aged 30 to 39 years had the highest cumulative incidence, with 208 infections per 100 people across the 7 months.

"Decision makers need to be aware of this burden to adapt and create new policies with the goal of reducing infection incidences, for example by establishing new strategies on vaccinations." the authors wrote.

Decision makers need to be aware of this burden to adapt and create new policies with the goal of reducing infection incidences

"While the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infections is reduced due to the achieved immunity in the population, we will likely face a higher burden of ARI than before the pandemic, even if no new SARS-CoV-2 variants will appear," the authors concluded. "This additional burden of ARI has to be considered particularly with respect to the implications for the work force."

Read this article:

1 in 5 adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during pandemic - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

NH man sells yacht bought with COVID-19 funds to reimburse feds – The Union Leader

April 17, 2024

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Here is the original post:

NH man sells yacht bought with COVID-19 funds to reimburse feds - The Union Leader

Akiko Iwasaki Is on the 2024 TIME100 List | TIME – TIME

April 17, 2024

By Anthony Fauci

April 17, 2024 7:00 AM EDT

The COVID-19 pandemic has left a lingering imprint on 65 million people worldwide suffering persistent symptoms after their acute illness has resolved. Yale professor Akiko Iwasaki is a renowned immunologist whom I have known since her fellowship at the National Institutes of Health 25 years ago marked her as a rising star. Today, she is at the top of her game. Her deep appreciation of the regulation of the human immune system has allowed her to lead the way in delineating the mechanisms of how it reacts to COVID-19, and the consequences of Long COVID. Her expertise in innate immunityor how the immune system first reacts to pathogensis providing key insights into Long COVID, validating patient experiences and informing treatment strategies. Her accomplishments have earned her election to both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine. Her leadership and her compassion, including championing women and people of color in science, has enormously benefited the scientific enterprise, and all of us.

Fauci is a professor in the Georgetown University School of Medicine and a former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the U.S. National Institutes of Health

More here:

Akiko Iwasaki Is on the 2024 TIME100 List | TIME - TIME

Akiko Iwasaki Is on the 2024 TIME100 List | TIME – TIME

April 17, 2024

By Anthony Fauci

April 17, 2024 7:00 AM EDT

The COVID-19 pandemic has left a lingering imprint on 65 million people worldwide suffering persistent symptoms after their acute illness has resolved. Yale professor Akiko Iwasaki is a renowned immunologist whom I have known since her fellowship at the National Institutes of Health 25 years ago marked her as a rising star. Today, she is at the top of her game. Her deep appreciation of the regulation of the human immune system has allowed her to lead the way in delineating the mechanisms of how it reacts to COVID-19, and the consequences of Long COVID. Her expertise in innate immunityor how the immune system first reacts to pathogensis providing key insights into Long COVID, validating patient experiences and informing treatment strategies. Her accomplishments have earned her election to both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine. Her leadership and her compassion, including championing women and people of color in science, has enormously benefited the scientific enterprise, and all of us.

Fauci is a professor in the Georgetown University School of Medicine and a former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the U.S. National Institutes of Health

See the rest here:

Akiko Iwasaki Is on the 2024 TIME100 List | TIME - TIME

Higher education was easily accessible to disabled people during Covid. Why are we being shut out now? – The Guardian

April 17, 2024

Opinion

The pandemic showed that remote learning is effective. Its absurd that universities are going back to processes that exclude us

Wed 17 Apr 2024 08.00 EDT

My route to university was never going to be simple. While my friends were flicking through university brochures and choosing Ucas options, I was signing chemotherapy consent forms in the teenage cancer unit at Addenbrookes hospital and throwing up in its weirdly tropical island-themed bathrooms. Even before then, my severe chronic illness made attending traditional university unthinkable until the pandemic happened.

In 2020, for the first time, it became possible to attend a brick-and-mortar university online. Universities became accessible or at least, more accessible than they had ever been practically overnight. Accommodations that disabled students had been requesting for years, such as lecture recordings and software that would allow them to take exams from home, were slotted into place so that students could learn remotely. Suddenly, friends at university were having the kind of experience that would have enabled me to join them. But since the end of the pandemic, online learning has withered away and thousands of students have been left without sufficient access. By returning to the pre-pandemic state of affairs, universities are failing current and prospective disabled students like me.

The return to solely in-person learning ignores everything experts in the field have recommended and, I believe, neglects universities legal duty to make reasonable adjustments to ensure people with disabilities are not disadvantaged. Organisations that represent disabled students have made it clear that continued online provision is crucial, with many students requesting the same. Id like the option for remote learning to still be given to students who ask for it, said one student in a report from the Disabled Students Commission. As a disabled student, I have found remote learning although challenging at times easier than the challenges I would have to deal with if I had to attend on-campus teaching.. Similarly, in a survey of 326 disabled students by Disabled Students UK, 84.5% said the option of online learning post-pandemic would benefit them.

Analysis carried out by The Office for Students, the independent regulator of higher education in England, found the achievement gap between disabled and non-disabled students narrowed during the period of pandemic-induced online learning, strongly suggesting many disabled students found online delivery superior to in-person teaching.

Of course, theres no one-size-fits-all solution. Some disabilities make online learning harder. But for those who would benefit from online programmes, the rewards are clear. The flexibility of online learning is especially important for students, like me, whose symptoms wax and wane, making the ability to study and take exams when able to perform best essential. Students with mobility impairments or executive functioning issues find not having to navigate campus helpful, because they can save their energy for studying, not logistics. Even for disabled students who wish to attend mostly in person, the ability to study online alleviates pressures of attendance requirements, which are still often linked to financial assistance.

According to the Office for National Statistics, only 24.9% of disabled adults aged 21-64 have a degree or above, compared with 42.7% of non-disabled adults. For disabled people, going to university almost halves the disability job gap the difference in employment levels between disabled and non-disabled people meaning higher education is the best chance for disabled people to find employment. With recent findings by the Institute for Fiscal Studies showing disabled people now make up nearly half of the countrys most deprived working-age adults, surely this is an urgent issue to confront. One that, in an election year, when the record levels of long-term sickness are frequently used as political fodder, all parties should be pressed into tackling. Particularly when soon the Department for Work and Pensions work capability assessment will recognise online work, so disabled people will be required to work remotely, but unable to access most higher education in the same way. Offering disabled people access to online university is an easy intervention to increase their chances of success. When we already know provision is possible, why arent we doing everything in our power to make studying more accessible?

Arguments that online programmes arent equivalent to traditional courses fall flat, given the disinclination of universities to refund students forced online during the pandemic. If online teaching was good enough then, why isnt it good enough now, for the people who would benefit most?

Im not saying the experience of studying online during the peak of Covid-19 was wholly positive; many students struggled. The pandemic was an awful time, made worse by the uncertainty and isolation some students felt after everything moved online. This was exacerbated by sometimes haphazard delivery quality was a lottery depending on the institution. And yet, in a Disabled Students UK survey, 69.9% found online learning to be equally or more accessible than in-person learning. True, online university cant offer the social benefits of a traditional experience, but if online learning were widely available, students could choose what was best for them.

The Open University, home to the UKs largest disabled student population, while pioneering accessibility, cannot serve everyone. It doesnt offer every course, and frankly, it shouldnt be expected to. But disabled students deserve choice, like all students. They shouldnt have to settle (while paying thousands of pounds) for a course they arent passionate about, purely because theres no other option especially when we know the resources exist that would allow them to attend other universities.

To politicians and pundits, Im an economic burden, despite being desperate to study and repeatedly denied access. Years after my friends have graduated, I watch as they go on to jobs and PhDs while I struggle to even get a foot in the door, my request to study remotely refused by university after university.

I dont know if Ill be able to go to university anytime soon. But until I can, the system is failing me, and everyone like me. And as disability rates rise, more people than ever are being left behind. Not many of the issues I face as a disabled person are easily solvable, but this one is.

Rosie Anfilogoff is a writer and journalist

Comments on this piece are premoderated to ensure discussion remains on topics raised by the writer. Please be aware there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

One-timeMonthlyAnnual

Other

Read the original here:

Higher education was easily accessible to disabled people during Covid. Why are we being shut out now? - The Guardian

Higher education was easily accessible to disabled people during Covid. Why are we being shut out now? – The Guardian

April 17, 2024

Opinion

The pandemic showed that remote learning is effective. Its absurd that universities are going back to processes that exclude us

Wed 17 Apr 2024 08.00 EDT

My route to university was never going to be simple. While my friends were flicking through university brochures and choosing Ucas options, I was signing chemotherapy consent forms in the teenage cancer unit at Addenbrookes hospital and throwing up in its weirdly tropical island-themed bathrooms. Even before then, my severe chronic illness made attending traditional university unthinkable until the pandemic happened.

In 2020, for the first time, it became possible to attend a brick-and-mortar university online. Universities became accessible or at least, more accessible than they had ever been practically overnight. Accommodations that disabled students had been requesting for years, such as lecture recordings and software that would allow them to take exams from home, were slotted into place so that students could learn remotely. Suddenly, friends at university were having the kind of experience that would have enabled me to join them. But since the end of the pandemic, online learning has withered away and thousands of students have been left without sufficient access. By returning to the pre-pandemic state of affairs, universities are failing current and prospective disabled students like me.

The return to solely in-person learning ignores everything experts in the field have recommended and, I believe, neglects universities legal duty to make reasonable adjustments to ensure people with disabilities are not disadvantaged. Organisations that represent disabled students have made it clear that continued online provision is crucial, with many students requesting the same. Id like the option for remote learning to still be given to students who ask for it, said one student in a report from the Disabled Students Commission. As a disabled student, I have found remote learning although challenging at times easier than the challenges I would have to deal with if I had to attend on-campus teaching.. Similarly, in a survey of 326 disabled students by Disabled Students UK, 84.5% said the option of online learning post-pandemic would benefit them.

Analysis carried out by The Office for Students, the independent regulator of higher education in England, found the achievement gap between disabled and non-disabled students narrowed during the period of pandemic-induced online learning, strongly suggesting many disabled students found online delivery superior to in-person teaching.

Of course, theres no one-size-fits-all solution. Some disabilities make online learning harder. But for those who would benefit from online programmes, the rewards are clear. The flexibility of online learning is especially important for students, like me, whose symptoms wax and wane, making the ability to study and take exams when able to perform best essential. Students with mobility impairments or executive functioning issues find not having to navigate campus helpful, because they can save their energy for studying, not logistics. Even for disabled students who wish to attend mostly in person, the ability to study online alleviates pressures of attendance requirements, which are still often linked to financial assistance.

According to the Office for National Statistics, only 24.9% of disabled adults aged 21-64 have a degree or above, compared with 42.7% of non-disabled adults. For disabled people, going to university almost halves the disability job gap the difference in employment levels between disabled and non-disabled people meaning higher education is the best chance for disabled people to find employment. With recent findings by the Institute for Fiscal Studies showing disabled people now make up nearly half of the countrys most deprived working-age adults, surely this is an urgent issue to confront. One that, in an election year, when the record levels of long-term sickness are frequently used as political fodder, all parties should be pressed into tackling. Particularly when soon the Department for Work and Pensions work capability assessment will recognise online work, so disabled people will be required to work remotely, but unable to access most higher education in the same way. Offering disabled people access to online university is an easy intervention to increase their chances of success. When we already know provision is possible, why arent we doing everything in our power to make studying more accessible?

Arguments that online programmes arent equivalent to traditional courses fall flat, given the disinclination of universities to refund students forced online during the pandemic. If online teaching was good enough then, why isnt it good enough now, for the people who would benefit most?

Im not saying the experience of studying online during the peak of Covid-19 was wholly positive; many students struggled. The pandemic was an awful time, made worse by the uncertainty and isolation some students felt after everything moved online. This was exacerbated by sometimes haphazard delivery quality was a lottery depending on the institution. And yet, in a Disabled Students UK survey, 69.9% found online learning to be equally or more accessible than in-person learning. True, online university cant offer the social benefits of a traditional experience, but if online learning were widely available, students could choose what was best for them.

The Open University, home to the UKs largest disabled student population, while pioneering accessibility, cannot serve everyone. It doesnt offer every course, and frankly, it shouldnt be expected to. But disabled students deserve choice, like all students. They shouldnt have to settle (while paying thousands of pounds) for a course they arent passionate about, purely because theres no other option especially when we know the resources exist that would allow them to attend other universities.

To politicians and pundits, Im an economic burden, despite being desperate to study and repeatedly denied access. Years after my friends have graduated, I watch as they go on to jobs and PhDs while I struggle to even get a foot in the door, my request to study remotely refused by university after university.

I dont know if Ill be able to go to university anytime soon. But until I can, the system is failing me, and everyone like me. And as disability rates rise, more people than ever are being left behind. Not many of the issues I face as a disabled person are easily solvable, but this one is.

Rosie Anfilogoff is a writer and journalist

Comments on this piece are premoderated to ensure discussion remains on topics raised by the writer. Please be aware there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

One-timeMonthlyAnnual

Other

Continue reading here:

Higher education was easily accessible to disabled people during Covid. Why are we being shut out now? - The Guardian

What toilets can reveal about COVID, cancer and other health threats – Nature.com

April 17, 2024

In late 2020, COVID-19s global death toll was rising as cold weather in the Northern Hemisphere and holiday gatherings spurred rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of a vaccine. Scientists and public-health officials were desperate for new ways to track the virus, which often moved faster than contact tracers could follow it.

Tong Zhang, an environmental engineer and microbiologist at the University of Hong Kong (HKU), and his colleagues were pioneers of what was fast becoming a popular surveillance method. They had been collecting periodic wastewater samples from about two dozen maintenance holes in the city and testing the sewage for coronavirus DNA, with support from Hong Kongs government. In late December, they traced an outbreak to a single apartment building where there had been no sign of cases1.

The government quickly took action. Officials tested all of the buildings 2,000-odd residents; 9 tested positive. Those people were isolated and went to a quarantine site. So they stopped the transmission chain, Zhang says. After that success, he and his colleagues expanded their efforts.

These scientists traced a new coronavirus lineage to one office through sewage

Wastewater testing remains part of Hong Kongs COVID-19 strategy to this day. Zhangs team tests for the coronavirus at about 20 sites across the city each week, he says, and the team has expanded the analysis of these samples to cover other pathogens, including influenza, rotavirus, norovirus and mpox, as well as markers of antimicrobial resistance. He views wastewater testing as a way to gauge the health of an entire community at once. If we can make the methodology more standardized, this tool becomes a promising and exciting way to screen the world for pathogens, including those that scientists havent yet identified,he says.

Many researchers are following similar approaches. There are currently more than 4,600 sites around the world where wastewater is being collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing, and some of the research teams involved are investigating other potential applications, such as tracking illicit drug use and even the prevalence of cancer.

But whether this has the potential to be an effective public-health strategy is still a matter of debate. Leo Poon, a colleague of Zhangs at HKUs School of Public Health, says that more research should be done before health agencies expand their sewage testing programmes and make this surveillance part of their routine budgets. Theres still a lot unknown, he says, particularly in terms of testing for pathogens besides SARS-CoV-2. I think theres a steep learning curve at the moment: when we detect something, what does it mean?

Many of the projects tracking COVID-19 through wastewater started in similar ways. Scientists learnt early in the pandemic that SARS-CoV-2 could be identified in sewage2, and made contact with local water authorities and health agencies to get samples.

By the end of 2020, several studies had shown that levels of coronavirus in public water systems could correlate with the number of COVID-19 cases in the community. For example, researchers at Stanford University in California found that viral levels in wastewater rose and fell with cases in the San Francisco Bay area3. The group that led the work has gone on to found the WastewaterSCAN project, which tests samples from nearly 200 sites across the United States (see Peak transmission).

Source: WastewaterSCAN

In the most successful wastewater projects, scientists say, researchers collaborated directly with public-health officials, who used the data to inform COVID-19 safety policies. This happened in rural parts of Ghana, where, as in Hong Kong, wastewater testing found COVID-19 cases that hadnt been caught by other types of surveillance. Habib Yakubu, a public-health researcher at Emory Universitys Center for Global Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Atlanta, Georgia, worked with a team of Ghanaian scientists to develop testing methods that accounted for the countrys limited public sewers and laboratory equipment. They tried this in two rural districts, Nanumba North and Mion, where government officials suspected that COVID-19 might be spreading but where clinical testing hadnt identified any cases.

The researchers worked with community leaders to identify sites for sampling, including schools, health-care facilities, markets and streams used for washing clothes. We looked at, where do people converge? Yakubu says. COVID-19 was, in fact, present in these regions, the researchers found. As a result, officials increased public-health activities, including community education and vaccination efforts. The team tested for other diseases that are common in Ghana, including cholera and typhoid, which has also informed health actions.

For scientists at the Tata Institute for Genetics and Society in Bengaluru, India, the need for wastewater testing for COVID-19 became clear after the countrys devastating wave of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2021, says Farah Ishtiaq, an evolutionary ecologist at Tata who leads the COVID-19 surveillance programme in the city. She and her colleagues worked with officials to set up testing at 28 water treatment plants in Bengaluru a logistically challenging task, because the team had to collect samples manually rather than using the automated samplers common in higher-income nations.

This testing proved its worth during the spread of the Omicron variant in Bengaluru the following year, Ishtiaq says. Wastewater data demonstrated that Omicron variants were spreading widely across the city at a time when data from the health-care system were limited. Officials responded by renewing mask mandates and placing restrictions on large gatherings, she says.

Inspired by case studies such as these, the field has grown drastically over the past 4 years, with hundreds of research teams now testing in 72 countries, according to the COVIDPoops19 dashboard maintained by environmental engineer Colleen Naughton and her colleagues at the University of California, Merced (see Uneven coverage).

Sources: COVIDPoops19 (https://go.nature.com/4ATGHY)/World Bank

In December 2023 and January 2024, it was clear that COVID-19 was spreading widely in several parts of the world. But public-health agencies had severely cut back on conventional testing and surveillance programmes, leading to uncertainty about how much the coronavirus was spreading, and a sudden focus on wastewater-based epidemiology.

Some scientists and social-media commentators stated that SARS-CoV-2 levels in wastewater correlated with specific case numbers, estimating huge surges in the United States and Europe. But others cautioned that wastewater surveillance is not reliable enough to predict true infection numbers. Theres a false sense of precision in such estimates, says Sam Scarpino, an epidemiologist at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts, who has worked on COVID-19 data systems.

Estimates are difficult to make because the sewage data differ considerably from conventional health indicators. In typical surveillance, data represent individual infected people who can be identified through contact tracing, isolated and treated. In wastewater surveillance operations, data can represent entire communities.

COVID variants found in sewage weeks before showing up in tests

They make a litre represent a million people, says Douglas Manuel, a public-health physician at the University of Ottawa in Canada. Manuel and his colleagues have identified several variables that can alter results from such screenings; these include population density, precipitation, sample composition, handling and testing methods and quality-control measures4. For example, as snow melts in Ottawas spring, it flows into the wastewater system and scours out solid waste that might have built up in the pipes, Manuel says. This could interfere with findings relating to SARS-CoV-2 measurements.

To account for those variables, researchers tend to compare measurements from one site over time. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for instance, developed a metric called the wastewater viral activity level that compares a testing sites recent SARS-CoV-2 measurement to past ones, then averages those comparison values across larger regions.

These comparison metrics can be helpful for presenting wastewater results to the public, but they gloss over the datas complexity. Bilge Kocamemi, an environmental engineer at Marmara University in Istanbul and a project coordinator for Turkeys wastewater testing, says that she quickly realized that scientific representation of the data makes the data unusable for the public. Instead, she and her colleagues developed a relatively simple COVID-19 map: testing sites are displayed in different shades of yellow and green, depending on how high SARS-CoV-2 levels are. This coloured scale is not precise, Kocamemi says, but its easy for people who dont have a scientific background to understand.

Modelling case counts or other metrics of COVID-19 spread in a community, such as how many people will be hospitalized from viral levels in wastewater is difficult, but not impossible, say scientists who work on this challenge. Such models would make it easier for health officials to make policy decisions on the basis of sewage data.

The myriad ways sewage surveillance is helping fight COVID around the world

The CDCs Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics in Washington DC, which launched in 2022, is one group taking on this challenge. Wastewater data are a really good leading indicator for COVID-19s burden on hospitals, says Dylan George, the centres director. In February, George and his colleagues released new hospital forecasting models informed by wastewater data, among other metrics (see go.nature.com/43xumbz). Studies have shown that such models are more accurate when they use wastewater data in tandem with data from the health-care system, rather than just one of those sources5.

George cautions that ongoing research will be needed to better understand the connection between virus levels in wastewater and disease levels in a community. For example, some scientists think that virus levels might change as SARS-CoV-2 continues to mutate; a variant known as JN.1 might cause people to shed more virus particles, or shed them for longer compared with previous variants, George says. I think thats going to be an active area of research going forward.

Modellers would like to have more detailed clinical testing data to allow them to make better comparisons between wastewater results and community infections. The challenge is often even greater for researchers testing wastewater for other viruses, says Casandra Philipson, a scientist at Ginkgo Bioworks, a company in Boston that analyses sewage from aeroplanes and airports, along with conducting research into new biosecurity tools. Philipson says that there are decent clinical data available for COVID-19, flu and respiratory syncytial virus. But, she adds, When you get outside of those three pathogens, there really is a massive data scarcity issue.

Some scientists are interested in a range of other diseases and health indicators that show up in peoples waste.

Manual wastewater sampling in India.Credit: Environmental Images/Universal Images Group/Shutterstock

Bernd Manfred Gawlik, who coordinates wastewater work at the European Commissions Joint Research Centre in Brussels, calls wastewater the dirty blood of the city, and compares sewage sampling to blood testing. We are now only starting to understand how to diagnose this blood at the collective level, he says.

One common target of testing is antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an area of wastewater research that pre-dates the pandemic. Ishtiaq, in Bengaluru, says that AMR is a huge problem in this part of the world, because many people use unregulated antibiotics. Her research has expanded from COVID-19 testing to a multifaceted, genomic platform that can look for both viral and bacterial infections. Wastewater data will help researchers to understand which pathogens are driving infections and communicate that information to physicians, she says.

Fatma Guerfali, a molecular biologist and bioinformatician at the Pasteur Institute in Tunis, is also tracking AMR in Tunisia, one of the countries considered most at risk. Guerfali says that she and her colleagues are working with the countrys health agency, as well as with research collaborators in other African countries, to determine how best to expand the programme, which started with COVID-19 testing.

How sewage could reveal true scale of coronavirus outbreak

Beyond global targets such as AMR and flu, wastewater testing priorities differ according to local health challenges. Because this testing can pick up a wide variety of pathogens, scientists often consult with health agencies to determine which targets to prioritize. In Louisville, Kentucky, for example, Ted Smith, director of the Center for Healthy Air, Water and Soil at the University of Louisville, and his colleagues are testing for a panvirome panel that includes about 30 pathogens of interest to the local health agency. Last year, the testing picked up measles during an outbreak in the state, and health officials used the data to inform vaccination programmes, alerts for physicians and other health efforts, he says.

Another area of expansion lies in testing chemicals that people excrete into wastewater. Some researchers, such as those at the start-up company Biobot Analytics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, are screening for opioids and other drugs with a risk of misuse. Smith and his colleagues are testing sewage for compounds indicative of exposure to air pollution and they have started research into lead levels. Every day, we come up with new things that we can interrogate wastewater for, he says.

A few researchers are even going beyond diseases spread by humans to those spread by animals. In 2022, scientists published work linking new SARS-CoV-2 variants in New York Citys wastewater to the citys rats6. Ishtiaq is looking at avian flu in Bengaluru, and Ekta Patel, a scientist at the International Livestock Research Institute in Kenya, is studying animal diseases there.

Patel and her colleagues are sampling sewage at slaughterhouses and testing for 66 pathogens, including anthrax, brucellosis, and Rift Valley fever. To complement the wastewater tests, Patel hopes her team can collect data from veterinary clinics and community hospitals.

Some wastewater scientists reflect on how different the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic might have been had there been a robust global sewage-surveillance system in place. Researchers could have immediately retroactively screened wastewater all around the planet as soon as the viruss sequence was released, Scarpino says. This screening could have led to a global list of places SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading, informing strategies to contain the virus even before clinical testing was widely available.

Scarpino argues that such a system would require major financial investment, national and scientific leaders who can take ownership of those projects and standards that make wastewater data more comparable across countries7.

The current COVID-19-testing community came out of need and chaos, says Megan Diamond, who works on wastewater surveillance at the Rockefeller Foundation in New York City. Global and regional institutions such as the World Health Organization, the European Union and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention might need to step up and offer guidance for testing, data sharing and standards, Diamond says.

Gawlik has worked on one such broad effort: the Global Consortium for Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance for Public Health, or GLOWACON, which was launched in Brussels in March. By recruiting more than 300 collaborators from around the world, including scientists, government officials and representatives of international organizations, to this consortium, he hopes to advance new methods for diagnosing health issues from the dirty blood of cities around the world.

Here is the original post:

What toilets can reveal about COVID, cancer and other health threats - Nature.com

Older adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, research finds – Medical Xpress

April 17, 2024

This article has been reviewed according to ScienceX's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

close

Researchers found that approximately one in five older Canadian adults with diabetes and no pre-pandemic functional limitations developed functional limitations for the first time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Functional limitations refer to difficulties with basic mobility-related tasks, such as walking two to three blocks, standing up from a chair, or climbing stairs. In comparison, only one in eight of their peers without diabetes developed functional limitations during the pandemic. The study was published in the Canadian Journal of Diabetes.

"Functional status is an important predictor of longevity and quality of life among older adults, and individuals with diabetes face a higher risk of functional decline than the general population," said first author Andie MacNeil, a research assistant at the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work (FIFSW) and the Institute for Life Course and Aging at the University of Toronto.

"Because the pandemic exacerbated many risk factors for functional decline, such as social isolation and physical inactivity, we wanted to examine changes in functional status among this population."

The study's sample came from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national longitudinal study of older Canadians. Respondents with diabetes were 53% more likely to develop at least one functional limitation during the pandemic compared to respondents without diabetes. Even after taking into account major risk factors for functional decline, such as such as physical activity, obesity, smoking, and other chronic health conditions, older adults with diabetes still faced a 28% higher risk of developing functional limitations.

"It is important for health professionals to encourage their older patients, particularly those with diabetes, to engage in behaviors that can help maintain their functional status, such as regular physical activity," said co-author Susanna Abraham Cottagiri, doctoral candidate at the School of Medicine at Queens University.

The study also found that socioeconomic factors were associated with functional limitations among older adults with and without diabetes. When compared to those with an annual household income of $100,000 or more, older adults with diabetes with an income of $20,000 or less had a five-fold higher risk of developing at least one functional limitation.

Even among those without diabetes, those with an income of $20,000 or less had double the risk of developing at least one functional limitation compared to those with an annual income of $100,000 or more.

"While socioeconomic status is an important predictor of functional decline among those both with and without diabetes, the magnitude of this relationship is much greater for respondents with diabetes," said co-author Ying Jiang, a senior epidemiologist at the Public Health Agency of Canada.

The authors also examined the probabilities of functional limitations across various patient characteristics such as sex, diabetes status, and household income, and then stratified into several risk factors, such as age, physical activity level, smoking status, multimorbidity, and weight. Across various patient profiles, socioeconomic status was a consistent driver of functional status.

Co-author Professor Paul Villeneuve at the Department of Neuroscience and the CHAIM Research Center, Carleton University, hypothesized the possible reason for this pattern: "People with low socioeconomic status face disproportionate stressors over their lifetime that may adversely impact their physical functioning in older age, such as working more physically demanding jobs, worse nutrition, and living in areas with less greenspace and walkability."

The researchers hope these findings can be used to inform interventions to promote better physical functioning among middle age and older adults.

"Combining lifestyle approaches that integrate physical activity with nutrition interventions have been shown to improve physical function in older adults with diabetes," said co-author Margaret de Groh, scientific manager at the Public Health Agency of Canada.

"Poverty remains a major barrier to nutrition and food security," said senior author Professor Esme Fuller-Thomson at the University of Toronto's FIFSW and director of the Institute for Life Course & Aging. "It is important to think about broader strategies to decrease poverty and improve food access in Canada in order to promote better physical functioning among older adults."

The study included 6,045 participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) who were free from functional limitations in the 20152018 wave of data collection and who provided information on their functional status during the COVID-19 pandemic (SeptemberDecember 2020).

More information: Andie MacNeil et al, Incident Functional Limitations Among Older Adults With Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Prospective Data From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, Canadian Journal of Diabetes (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.02.005

Go here to read the rest:

Older adults with diabetes experienced functional decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, research finds - Medical Xpress

Biden administration announces new global plan to thwart future pandemics : Goats and Soda – NPR

April 17, 2024

An EMT wearing personal protective equipment prepares to unload COVID-19 transfer patients in the early days of the pandemic. The Biden Administration has just announced a new program aimed at preventing the next pandemic. John Moore/Getty Images hide caption

An EMT wearing personal protective equipment prepares to unload COVID-19 transfer patients in the early days of the pandemic. The Biden Administration has just announced a new program aimed at preventing the next pandemic.

A disease originating in a remote area halfway around the world can travel to the U.S. in as little as 72 hours.

That's why the Biden administration has launched a new effort to improve the ability of the U.S. to prevent, detect and respond to the spread of infectious diseases.

While the U.S. has long been the global leader in health security, the White House's new Global Health Security Strategy, announced today, strives to make the country even better prepared for future pandemics, outbreaks and biological threats regardless of where they occur. However, experts in the field worry the new strategy does not go far enough and financial realities will limit the effort's impact.

As part of the new strategy, the U.S. is expanding its health security partnerships from 19 countries to 50 countries in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Middle East. The U.S. is going to help these countries bolster their capacity to identify and respond to diseases, including improved testing, surveillance, lab capacity and immunizations.

The U.S. is already helping the Democratic Republic of Congo with its mpox outbreak, noted a senior administration official who spoke on background at a press call ahead of the announcement. The official says the hope is that the G7 will commit to supporting at least 50 additional countries.

The new strategy also aims to better coordinate efforts across the U.S. government as well as convince other countries and international bodies to make serious financial and political commitments to pandemic preparedness. The new plan will roll out over five years and is based on lessons learned from the COVID pandemic, which took millions of lives and upended the global economy.

"It will help protect people across our nation and around the world from security threats, particularly those posed by infectious diseases," said President Joe Biden in a statement. "It will make the United States stronger, safer and healthier than ever before."

But even though Lawrence Gostin thinks it's a praiseworthy moment, he isn't sure that will be enough.

Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University, sees major gaps in the new strategy.

"Some of the very, very key issues like investment in research and development for vaccines, like financing, like accountability and compliance all of these things are absent as well as any strategy for really the gorilla in the room, if you will, which is all the disinformation and misinformation about vaccines and science and public health," he says.

He points out that the federal money earmarked for global health security in the fiscal year 2024 was slashed by $200 million.

"How I see this is: The White House doing the very best it can in a highly constrained political and economic environment," says Gostin.

The senior administration official who spoke on background says the hope is that as Americans see how important this work is Congress will approve more money for next year's budget. The global effort at pandemic preparedness is estimated to cost $30 billion annually.

As the U.S. rolls out this strategy, the World Health Organization is busy hashing out its own agreement aimed at making the world better prepared for the next pandemic. The latest, near-final draft of the WHO's pandemic accord is slated to be distributed to member states later today. The process of negotiating and drafting this accord has been fraught as nations negotiate how information and vaccines will be shared and how the financing will work.

The senior administration official says the U.S.'s new global health security strategy is not meant to undermine WHO efforts but instead demonstrate that the U.S. is committed to preventing the next pandemic irrespective of what happens on the global stage.

Read the original post:

Biden administration announces new global plan to thwart future pandemics : Goats and Soda - NPR

Page 57«..1020..56575859..7080..»