Category: Covid-19

Page 462«..1020..461462463464..470480..»

Three Unknowns Will Define COVID-19 This Winter – The Atlantic

November 18, 2021

Winter has a way of bringing out the worst of the coronavirus. Last year, the season saw a record surge that left nearly 250,000 Americans dead and hospitals overwhelmed around the country. This year, we are much better prepared, with effective vaccinesand, soon, powerful antiviralsthat defang the coronavirus, but cases seem to be on the rise again, prompting fears of another big surge.

How bad will it get? We are no longer in the most dangerous phase of the pandemic, but we also have not reached the end. So COVID-19s trajectory over the next few months will depend on three key unknowns: how our immunity holds up, how the virus changes, and how we behave. These unknowns may also play out differently state to state, town to town, but together they will determine what ends up happening this winter.

Here are the basic numbers: The U.S. has fully vaccinated 59 percent of the country and recorded enough cases to account for 14 percent of the population. (Though, given limited testing, those case numbers almost certainly underestimate true infections.) What we dont know is how to put these two numbers together, says Elizabeth Halloran, an epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. What percentage of Americans have immunity against the coronavirusfrom vaccines or infection or both?

This is the key number that will determine the strength of our immunity wall this winter, but its impossible to pin down with the data we have. This uncertainty matters because even a small percentage difference in overall immunity translates to a large number of susceptible people. For example, an additional 5 percent of Americans without immunity is 16.5 million people, and 16.5 million additional infections could mean hundreds of thousands more hospitalizations. Because unvaccinated people tend to cluster geographically and because many hospital intensive-care units run close to capacity even in non-pandemic times, it doesnt take very many sick patients to overwhelm a local health-care system.

Read: I think Im done

Whats happening in Europe, says Ali Ellebedy, an immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis, is also a red sign. Several countries in Western Europe, which are more highly vaccinated than the U.S., are already seeing spikes heading into winter. Cases in Germany, which has vaccinated nearly 70 percent of its population, have increased sharply, overwhelming hospitals and spurring renewed restrictions on the unvaccinated. The U.S. does have a bit more immunity from previous infections than Germany because its had bigger past COVID waves, but it still has plenty of susceptible people.

The strength of immunity also varies from person to person. Immunity from past infection, in particular, can be quite variable. Vaccine-induced immunity tends to be more consistent, but older people and immunocompromised people mount weaker responses. And immunity against infection also clearly wanes over time in everyone, meaning breakthrough infections are becoming more common. Boosters, which are poised to be available to all adults soon, can counteract the waning this winter, though we dont yet know how durable that protection will be in the long term. If the sum of all this immunity is on the higher side, this winter might be relatively gentle; if not, we could be in store for yet another taxing surge.

At the beginning of the pandemic, scientists thought that this coronavirus mutated fairly slowly. Then, in late 2020, a more transmissible Alpha variant came along. And then an even more transmissible Delta variant emerged. In a year, the virus more than doubled its contagiousness. The evolution of this coronavirus may now be slowing, but that doesnt mean its stopped: We should expect the coronavirus to keep changing.

Alpha and Delta were evolutionary winners because they are just so contagious, and the virus could possibly find ways to up its transmissibility even more. But as more people get vaccinated or infected, our collective immunity gives more and more of an edge to variants that can evade the immune system instead. Delta has some of this ability already. In the future, says Sarah Cobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago, I think most fitness improvements are going to come from immune escape.

The Beta and Gamma variants also eroded immune protection, but they werent able to compete with the current Delta variant. There may yet be new variants that can. Whether any of this will happen in time to make a difference this winter is impossible to know, but it will happen eventually. This is just how evolution works. Other coronaviruses that cause the common cold also change every yearas does the flu. The viruses are always causing reinfections, but each reinfection also refreshes the immune systems memory.

Read: The coronavirus could get worse

A new variant could change the pandemic trajectory again this winter, but its not likely to reset the pandemic clock back to March 2020. We might end up with a variant that causes more breakthrough infections or reinfections, but our immune systems wont be totally fooled.

The coronavirus doesnt hop on planes, drive across state lines, or attend holiday parties. We do. COVID-19 spreads when we spread it, and predicting what people will do has been one of the biggest challenges of modeling the pandemic. Were constantly surprised when things are messier and weirder, says Jon Zelner, an epidemiologist at the University of Michigan.

The Delta wave in the Deep South over the summer, for example, ebbed in the late summer and early fall even though many COVID restrictions didnt come back. If anything, you might have expected cases to rise at that moment, because schools full of unmasked and unvaccinated children were reopening. So what happened? One possible explanation is that people became more careful with masking and social distancing as they saw cases rising around them. More people in the South did get vaccinated, though the rates still lag behind those in the highly vaccinated Northeast. Are surges self-limiting because people are modifying their behavior in response to recent surges? Cobey says. Thats just a really open question. Weather may also drive behavior; as temperatures cooled down in the South, people might have spent more time outdoors.

Another possible factor in ending the summer surge is that the virus may have simply infected everyone it could find at the timebut that is not the same as saying it has infected everyone in those states. The coronavirus doesnt spread evenly across a region, like ink through water. Instead, it has to travel along networks of connection between people. COVID-19 can run through an entire household or workplace, but it cant jump to the next one unless people are moving in between them. By sheer chance, the coronavirus may find some pockets of susceptible people but not others in any given wave. Theres a kind of randomness to it, Zelner says. This winter, we should expect a local flare-up every time the virus finds a pocket of susceptibility. But its hard to predict exactly when and where that will happen. The countrys current COVID hot spots are Michigan, Minnesota, and New Mexico, three states with no obvious connection among them.

Read: America has lost the plot on COVID

By winters end, the U.S. will emerge with more immunity than it has noweither through infection or, much preferable, through vaccinating more people. To me, this winter is the last stand, Zelner says. However these three unknowns play out this winter, COVID will eventually begin to fade as a disruptive force in our lives as it becomes endemic. Were not quite there yet, but our second pandemic winter will bring us one step closer.

Read more:

Three Unknowns Will Define COVID-19 This Winter - The Atlantic

NFL to intensify COVID-19 protocols around Thanksgiving holiday – ESPN

November 18, 2021

With Thanksgiving approaching and COVID-19 cases rising again nationwide, the NFL on Tuesday night issued a memo to its teams detailing changes to its COVID-19 protocols, including mandatory testing for all players and staff the Monday and Wednesday after the holiday and mandatory mask-wearing for all players and staff while inside club facilities from Nov. 25 through Dec. 1.

The memo, a copy of which was obtained by ESPN, also establishes new requirements for surveillance cameras in team facilities for the purpose of enforcing COVID-19 protocols. The memo says the league has been "periodically reviewing footage from surveillance cameras in club facilities to ensure Protocol compliance. Discipline has been issued against individual players and clubs as warranted."

Effective Nov. 29, all NFL teams will be required to have video cameras installed in their weight rooms and cafeterias, including weight rooms that are outdoors or in practice bubbles. Teams must retain video from those cameras for 30 days in case the league requests to view it for the purpose of finding out whether people are following mask requirements at team facilities.

2 Related

NFL chief medical officer Dr. Allen Sills said that 81 players and staff members tested positive for COVID-19 during the latest testing period, Oct. 31-Nov. 13, the highest caseload of the season. From Sept. 5 through Oct. 30, a total of 97 players and staff members tested positive, and the surge that followed sparked the decision to elevate testing and masking policies.

"That wasn't a total surprise to us," Sills said. "Because we've said our numbers in the NFL reflect what's going in our communities around us. We saw more disease in a number of areas of the country that are really spiking with caseloads. We're seeing and feeling the effect of that."

The league is testing roughly 6,500 people in each testing period.

The memo seems especially concerned about Thanksgiving. It says NFL teams "are strongly encouraged to offer drive-through testing" for friends and family of staff and players who will be staying or visiting with them for the holiday. "Such testing should be conducted before friends and family interact with players and staff."

All Tier 1 and Tier 2 individuals, regardless of vaccination status, will be Mesa [rapid PCR] tested on Monday, Nov. 29, and Wednesday, Dec. 1. Under the current protocols, unvaccinated players must be tested every day and wait for their test results to come back negative before they are allowed to enter the building, while vaccinated players and staff are tested once a week and do not have to wait for their results before entering. For the week after Thanksgiving, vaccinated individuals will be tested on Monday and Wednesday.

The memo also offers reminders about how testing procedures are expected to be conducted and about the requirements for mask-wearing for all members of the team traveling party while on buses or airplanes.

Meanwhile, Sills said the NFL and NFLPA have launched a voluntary study of COVID-19 antibody levels among vaccinated players and staff to get a better idea of whether immunity is waning. The results could inform a booster shot protocol later in the season, but for now the league is telling clubs to follow state and local guidelines on booster shots.

ESPN's Kevin Seifert contributed to this report.

Read this article:

NFL to intensify COVID-19 protocols around Thanksgiving holiday - ESPN

Maine reports 933 new cases of COVID-19, boosters expanded to everyone 18 and older – Press Herald

November 18, 2021

Maine is reporting 933 new cases of COVID-19 on Thursday, and 11 additional deaths, a day after the state expanded eligibility to everyone 18 and older to receive booster shots against the deadly virus.

The seven-day average of daily new cases stood at 535.4 on Thursday, compared to 558.3 a week ago and 527.6 a month ago.

Since the pandemic began, Maine has logged 114,065 cases of COVID-19, and 1,254 deaths.

Maine currently has the 22nd-highest cases per capita in the United States, with a daily average of 37.6 cases per 100,000 population over the past seven days, compared to the national daily average of 27 cases per 100,000, according to the Harvard Global Health Institute. Michigan and Minnesota are currently the hardest-hit states, with cases averaging about 75 cases per 100,000. Florida and Hawaii currently have the lowest cases per capita, at about 7 cases per 100,000 population.

Previously, boosters were recommended only for those 65 and older or those with immunodeficiencies, or for adults who originally received the one-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine. A federal advisory panel is set to review data Friday on the benefits of expanding booster eligibility, but Maines governor said the state is not waiting. Four other states Colorado, California, New Mexico, and Arkansas have opened eligibility as well.

Maines strong vaccination rate is saving lives and reducing hospitalizations and deaths, said Jeanne Lambrew, Maines health and human services commissioner, in a statement on Wednesday. But, with the continued surge of the delta variant, we must do all we can to protect Maine people from this deadly virus and ease the burden on our health care workers. Now, every Maine adult can get a booster shot to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their communities.

Cases have started to increase again across the country, stoking fears of another deadly wave as the holiday season approaches. According to the U.S. CDC, the seven-day case average is 83,671, an 11 percent increase from 75,186 cases on average two weeks earlier. Deaths are still averaging more than 1,000 per day across the country and more than 760,000 people have lost their lives to the virus since the pandemic began.

On the vaccination front, 952,425 Maine people have received their final dose of the vaccine, representing 70.9 percent of the states 1.3 million population.

With the rollout of vaccination for children ages 5-11 continuing into its third week, 16.8 percent of elementary schoolchildren in Maine have received their first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, which was approved in early November by federal regulators. In Cumberland County, where uptake of the vaccine is highest, 29 percent of children ages 5-11 have received their first dose, while rural counties such as Piscataquis, Somerset and Washington counties, less than 6 percent of elementary schoolchildren have gotten their first shot.

This story will be updated

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Next

Read this article:

Maine reports 933 new cases of COVID-19, boosters expanded to everyone 18 and older - Press Herald

COVID-19 is worst in persistently poor rural counties – Successful Farming

November 18, 2021

Throughout the pandemic, the highest COVID-19 case rates and the lowest vaccination rates in the country have been found in persistently poor rural counties, the USDA said Wednesday in its annual Rural America at a Glance report. Those counties have also had low unemployment rates, suggesting residents continued to work despite the risk of infection by the coronavirus, said the report.

This situation could be related to industry dependence. For example, a disproportionate share of rural meatpacking-dependent counties also are persistently poor, said the report from the Economic Research Service. A county is ranked as persistently poor if at least 20% of its residents live at or below the federal poverty line for four consecutive national censuses.

In the first 18 months of the pandemic, persistently poor counties had a cumulative 16,751 weekly COVID-19 cases per 100,000 residents, said the report. Urban counties that were not persistently poor had the lowest cumulative rate: 12,929 cases per 100,000 residents.

By early October, the vaccination rate in urban counties had reached 53%, while the vaccination rate in rural counties was about 42%, said the USDA report. Vaccination rates for persistently poor counties were the lowest in the nation, at 41.7%. TheDaily Yondersaid the urban/rural gap was 12 points last week, with 57% of urban Americans vaccinated compared to 45% of rural Americans.

Roughly 5.7 million of the 46 million rural Americans live in persistently poor counties. Those counties have lost nearly 6% of their population since 2010. During the same period, the overall U.S. population grew 7.4%.

The Rural America at a Glance report isavailable here.

Read the original:

COVID-19 is worst in persistently poor rural counties - Successful Farming

How Panic Spread in the Early Days of COVID-19 | Opinion – Newsweek

November 18, 2021

This essay is adapted from A Plague Upon Our House by Scott Atlas, due out from Bombardier Books December 7.

It was February 2020, and news accounts had been describing increasingly alarming information about a deadly new virus emanating from Wuhan, China. Apart from my general concern about the spread of the infection, I was confused about some of the basic numbers being aired. The overall message coming from the World Health Organization (WHO) seemed to have obvious flaws. The extremely high risk estimates seemed very misleading. Even worstthe reported fatality rates were based only on patients who were sick enough to seek medical care rather than on the undoubtedly much larger population of infected individuals. I was stunned that this basic methodological flaw was being overlooked by almost everyone, while the resulting fatality rate of 3.4 percent was highlighted throughout the media. Every legitimate medical scientist should have called that out. Their silence was puzzling.

In the United States and throughout the world, a naive discussion about statistical models ensued. To an extraordinary and unprecedented extent, these epidemiological models were featured front and center in news coverage, with no perspective on the models' usefulness. Reminiscent of other legendary frenzies in history, like the tulip bulb mania or the tech stock bubble, hypothetical extreme-risk scenarios went seemingly unchallenged and were given absolute credence.

At the same time, common sense and well-established principles of medicine were being ignored. Every second-year medical student knew that the elderly were almost certainly the most vulnerable group of people, since they were virtually always at highest risk of death and serious consequences from respiratory infections. Yet this was not stressed. To the contrary, the implication of reports and the public faces of official expertise implied that everyone was equally in danger. Even the initial evidence showed that elderly, frail people with preexisting comorbiditiesconditions that weakened their natural immunological defenseswere the ones at highest risk of death. This was a feature shared by other respiratory viruses, including seasonal influenza. The one unusual feature of this virus was the fact that children had an extraordinarily low risk. Yet this positive and reassuring news was never emphasized. Instead, with total disregard of the evidence of selective risk consistent with other respiratory viruses, public health officials recommended draconian isolation of everyone.

The architects of the American lockdown strategy were Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx. With Dr. Robert Redfield, the director of the CDC, they were the most influential medical members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force.

The task force quickly expanded to include a new chairman, Vice President Mike Pence. The White House also announced that Birx would be the task force's coordinator. She had worked in the State Department as the U.S. AIDS coordinator under the Obama and Trump administrationshence she was often addressed by the honorific "ambassador." The task force ultimately included representation from numerous federal agencies concerned with health, science, national emergencies and logistics, the economy and many other relevant concerns.

The task force dealt with a number of issues at its origin. Since the country had not been well prepared for a pandemic, one of the primary tasks was to develop adequate testinga key public health measure in early infectious disease outbreaks. The second main set of tasks centered around the production and logistics of supportive medical equipment, including ventilators, personal protective supplies for hospitals and extra beds and personnel to accommodate sick patients anticipated to overwhelm the system.

Dr. Birx, Dr. Redfield and Dr. Faucioften called "the nation's top expert in infectious disease"dominated all discussions about the health and medical aspects of the emerging pandemic. One thing was very clear: all three were cut from the same cloth. First, they were all bureaucrats, with a background in various government agencies. Second, they shared a long history in HIV/AIDS as a public health crisis. That was problematic, because HIV couldn't be more different from SARS2 in its biology, its amenability to testing and contact tracing, its spread and the implications of those facts for its control. Indeed, the three of them spent many years focusing on the development of a vaccine, rather than treatment, for HIV/AIDSa vaccine that still does not exist.

It's also worth noting Dr. Fauci's history in regard to AIDS. He created headlines for his alarmist speculations in his 1983 JAMA editorial that AIDS could be transmitted by "routine close contact, as within a family household." It had already been known that transmission happened via fluids through blood or sexual contact. Less than two months later, on June 26 in The Baltimore Sun, Fauci publicly contradicted his own explosive claim: "It is absolutely preposterous to suggest that AIDS can be contracted through normal social contact like being in the same room with someone or sitting on a bus with them. The poor gays have received a very raw deal on this." That seemed like quite a flip-flop, with no new evidence or explanation givenmore reminiscent of a politician than a reliable scientist.

Most others on the task force were juggling several concerns or had no medical background. This was one more responsibility added to their portfolios, so they deferred to those deemed medical experts. Drs. Birx and Fauci commandeered federal policy under President Trump and publicly advocated for a total societal shutdown. Instead of focusing on protecting the most vulnerable, their illogical and extraordinarily blunt responsedespite its predictable, wide-ranging harmswas instituted as though it were simple common sense.

Over those first several weeks, fear had taken hold of the public. Media commentators and even policy experts, many of whom had no expertise on health care, were filling the airwaves and opinion pages with naive and incorrect predictions. This misinformation was going unchecked, and was indeed repeatedly endorsed and sensationalized. Some whom I had previously considered among my smartest colleagues and friends expressed great confusion and a striking absence of logic in analyzing what was happening.

I asked myself time and again, "Where are the critical thinkers?"

After more than 15 years a health policy researcher and decades in medical science and data analysis, I had never seen such flawed thinking. I was bewildered at the lack of logic, the absence of common sense and the reliance on fundamentally flawed science. Suddenly, computer modelers and people without any perspective about clinical illnesses were dominating the airwaves. Along with millions of other Americans, I began witnessing unprecedented responses from those in power and nonscientific recommendations by public health spokespeople: societal lockdowns including business and school closures, stay-at-home restrictions on individual movements, and arbitrary decrees by local, state, and federal governments.

These recommendations were not just based on panic; they were responsible for generating even more panic. COVID rapidly became the most important health policy crisis in a century.

Scott W. Atlas, M.D. is the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow in health care policy at the Hoover Institution.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Go here to see the original:

How Panic Spread in the Early Days of COVID-19 | Opinion - Newsweek

Opinion | On Abortion and Covid-19, a Court Goes Rogue – The New York Times

November 18, 2021

The Fifth Circuits aggressive behavior in the vaccine case almost pales in comparison to what the court has done with abortion. In September the court rejected pleas from abortion providers in Texas to put the vigilante law Senate Bill 8 on hold to enable the clinics to litigate their case against it. The clinics emergency motion came before the same three judges who later ruled in the OSHA vaccine case.

The panels 19-page unsigned opinion in the case, Whole Womans Health v. Jackson, analyzed the obstacles the private plaintiffs faced in finding someone to sue over a law that purports to insulate all state officials from responsibility for administering a flagrantly unconstitutional ban on abortion after only six weeks of pregnancy. In rejecting the clinics motion, the panel declared primly that we must respect the limits of our jurisdiction. The clinics claims against a Texas state court judge and court clerk were specious, the court said.

The federal government then brought its own suit against Texas on the completely different theory that S.B. 8 was an affront to the sovereign interests of the United States and to the supremacy of federal law. A federal district judge, Robert Pitman, granted the preliminary injunction the federal government sought in a 113-page opinion that meticulously dismantled all of the states objections to the courts jurisdiction.

A different Fifth Circuit three-judge panel, by a vote of 2 to 1, promptly blocked Judge Pitmans order, explaining in a single sentence of a single paragraph that it was granting the states request for the stay for the reasons stated in Whole Womans Health v. Jackson. How could this be? The reasons stated in rejecting the private plaintiffs case had nothing to do with the federal governments suit, as the Solicitor Generals Office told the Supreme Court in its application to vacate the Fifth Circuits stay.

Those reasons do not apply to this very different suit, the acting solicitor general, Brian Fletcher, explained to the justices. Sovereign immunity forced the private plaintiffs in Whole Womans Health to sue individual state officers, and this court and the Fifth Circuit questioned whether those officers were proper defendants. This suit does not raise those questions because it was brought against the state of Texas itself, and the state has no immunity from suits by the United States. The Fifth Circuit ignored that distinction, which refutes the courts only justification for the stay. When the justices refused to lift the stay, instead setting the case for the argument that took place on Nov. 1, Justice Sonia Sotomayor echoed the solicitor generals point in a powerful dissenting opinion.

There is no conceivable excuse for the Fifth Circuits failure to explain itself or for the Supreme Courts failure to call the court to account for its dereliction of duty. But so far, the Fifth Circuit is winning. S.B. 8 is still in effect.

Lets not forget that this is the same court that in 2018, in a challenge brought by an abortion provider, June Medical Services, upheld the Louisiana law that required doctors who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. It was bad enough that this was a requirement that, in the political and religious climate in Louisiana, doctors could not meet. What was really wrong with the Fifth Circuits decision was that two years earlier, in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt, the Supreme Court invalidated an identical law from Texas. In that case, the Supreme Court overturned a Fifth Circuit decision concluding that the admitting privileges requirement, despite having resulted in the closing of nearly half the abortion clinics in Texas, did not impose an undue burden on womens access to abortion.

Visit link:

Opinion | On Abortion and Covid-19, a Court Goes Rogue - The New York Times

Year Three of the COVID-19 Pandemic Begins – National Review

November 18, 2021

President Joe Biden removes his mask to deliver remarks on the importance of COVID-19 vaccine requirements in Elk Grove Village, Ill., October 7, 2021. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

On the menu today: Its easily overlooked, but yesterday, we quietly entered Year Three of the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain voices in the media are worried that families gathering for Thanksgiving dinner next week will be reckless and risky, but in most of the country, a small rise in COVID-19 cases is occurring alongside a slight decline in COVID-19 hospitalizations and a larger decline in COVID-19 deaths. That said, there are some crowded hospitals right now in places such as Colorado, Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

A Disquieting Anniversary

My younger sons science teacher told him yesterday that it was the two-year anniversary of the first COVID-19 case. That teacher is correct, at least as far as we know, in the sense that the South China Morning Post reported in March 2020 that the Chinese government believed the first known patient was a 55-year-old Hubei province resident, diagnosed on November 17, 2019. Because the Chinese government never shared that information, no one can independently verify it. So Patient Zero who started the pandemic might have been that 55-year-old Hubei province resident, or it could be someone else, such as the three researchers from Chinas Wuhan Institute of Virology who became sick enough in November 2019 that they sought hospital care and who lost their sense of smell. But hey, maybe its just a big strange coincidence! Big strange coincidences always seem to happen involving the Chinese government!

Dont Fear Thanksgiving . . . Unless Youre a Turkey

As we start Year Three of the COVID-19 pandemic, a minor rise in cases has a bunch of media voices warning that the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday is a potential disaster.

Holiday COVID alarm as cases rise 20 percent, warns Axios.

Were Having a Holiday Gathering. Are We Nuts? asks the New York Times.

Philadelphia Health Officials Concerned Region Could See New Wave Of COVID-19 Cases As Holidays Approach, reports the Philadelphia CBS affiliate.

But these warnings and expressions of concern are focusing on the measuring stick of an increase in the daily rate of new cases, and as I try to emphasize, over and over again, cases are no longer the most useful measuring stick for the severity and risk of this pandemic.

COVID-19 and the Delta variant are going to keep jumping around from person to person for the foreseeable future. A vaccinated person can still catch COVID-19, and they can still carry it and spread it to others. Vaccinations primary objective is to prevent you from having a severe reaction to the virus up to and including death if you do catch it. While vaccinated and unvaccinated people carry a comparable viral load how much of the virus is in their systems a recent study indicated that the viral load decreased faster for fully vaccinated people with a Delta infection than for unvaccinated people. The less time the virus is in your system, the less likely you are to spread it to someone else.

In the majority of cases, vaccinated people who get exposed to COVID-19 are either asymptomatic or have minor, manageable symptoms. The country has had more than 48 million diagnosed COVID-19 cases by now.

The more useful measuring sticks for the severity of the pandemic are hospitalizations and deaths. COVID-19 hospitalizations are down 1 percent in the past two weeks, and COVID-19 deaths are down 14 percent in the past two weeks. Right now, the U.S. has about 49,000 hospital beds being used by COVID-19 patients; back in early September, that number was about 95,000. In early January, it was about 125,000 on any given day.

In most of the country, hospitals have plenty of capacity to handle any post-Thanksgiving surge, but Ill get to the exceptions in a moment.

As of this morning, 76.7 percent of the countrys hospital beds are in use, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. That means 23 percent are open thats plenty of room. (Remember, hospitals dont like to have a lot of unused capacity because that creates financial problems. They need patients in those beds to pay for all of those doctors and nurses and MRI machines and all of the other considerable expenses that come with running a hospital.) Whats more, across the country, just 6.9 percent of hospital beds are in use by COVID-19 patients. A similar percentage of ICU beds are in use, and 15 percent of ICU beds are in use by COVID-19 patients.

When you look at the New York Times color-coded-by-county national map of cases per 100,000 people the one that confused Charles Blow so much you see the southeastern states are still light yellow, and a patchy line of oranges and reds and dark reds from Arizona and New Mexico, up through Colorado and Kansas, patches of Nebraska and the Dakotas, and looking intense and dark in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and stretching into western Pennsylvania and New York. Also note that for the first time in a long time, the northern areas of New England are turning darker, indicating a higher number of cases proportional to the population size.

Some of those states have Republican governors, and some of them have Democratic ones. States with high vaccination rates have lots of cases at the moment, while states with not-so-impressive vaccination rates have low numbers of cases in large part because the Delta variant already swept through in late summer. Vermont has some counties with more than 100 cases per 100,000 residents, despite the fact that more than 82 percent of its residents have at least one dose. Louisiana has just 54.7 percent of residents with at least one dose of a vaccine, but only one Louisiana county has more than 50 cases per 100,000 residents right now.

As the virus spreads around a population more, and cases go up, the odds of the virus jumping into someone who is unvaccinated, elderly, immunocompromised, has comorbidities, or has some combination of all of these traits increase as well and those are generally the people who end up in the hospital.

While most of the countrys hospitals have plenty of capacity, there are trouble spots, including Colorado:

There are only about 100 intensive care unit beds available in hospitals across the state, and more than 90 percent of them are filled many by coronavirus patients.

It is the busiest and the most stressful Ive ever seen it in 15 years of medicine, said Dr. Eric Hill, a physician at the Medical Center of Aurora.

Its a little disheartening at times, because we listen to the national news and hear about everyone is doing better, and that is not our experience in Colorado. The numbers are on the rise and the challenges are real, said Dr. Matt Mendenhall, an emergency room doctor.

Another state of concern is Minnesota, and note that part of the surge there stems from patients who delayed regular care during the pandemic:

Statewide, only about 3 percent of ICU beds were available Friday, along with less than 5% of non-ICU beds, according to the Minnesota Department of Health Response Capacity Dashboard.

Some hospitals report, on any given day, the situation may be even more dire than the statewide data shows.

Weve been 100 percent full for more than a month, said Dr. Bret Haake, vice president of medical officers and chief medical officers at Regions Hospital, part of the HealthPartners system. Everybody is as full or more full than theyve ever been in the history of their organizations.

Hospitals are seeing a wide range of medical issues, including people suffering complications due to putting off standard health care during the pandemic.

Also keep an eye on corners of Michigan . . .

(All) mid-Michigan hospitals (and most across the state) are experiencing high patient volumes right now, Hurley spokeswoman Peggy Agar said in a Tuesday, Nov. 16 email to MLive-The Flint Journal. Our capacity numbers on the state website reflect the number of beds available given the amount of staff we have currently available to provide the best care possible.

And Wisconsin is seeing a surge as well:

According to the state Department of Health Services, in the northwest hospital region, over 85 percent of total hospital beds are in use, and only about 2 percent of all ICU beds are readily available.

Eau Claire area hospitals have fallen victim to the sudden rise in need as well. At Mayo Clinic in Eau Claire, the number of patients has gone up about 25 percent in just the last two weeks, and its ICU has already had to send patients warranting admission to other hospitals.

A similar story is being seen at Marshfield Clinic in Eau Caire. Its been at or near capacity over the last two weeks.

Oddly, as parts of Colorado, Minnesota, Michigan, and Wisconsin feel strain on their hospitals after nearly a year of vaccination efforts, I dont see much media coverage comparing Jared Polis, Tim Walz, Gretchen Whitmer, or Tony Evers to governor Ron Deathsantis down in Florida. Why, its almost like these derisive labels are applied out of partisan animus instead of the actual conditions on the ground.

ADDENDUM: I find, as time goes by, that more and more of the news stories I focus upon are the ones that are so shocking and horrible, many other people dont want to believe that they are true. They suggest that we are much less safe, and that those who govern us are much less competent, than we want to believe or than we may need to believe, in order to go about our daily lives without overwhelming anxiety.

Theres considerable circumstantial evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic is the result of work conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The U.S. government chose to leave American citizens and green-card holders behind in Afghanistan and left loyal Afghan allies to die at the hands of the Taliban.

Now we can add another grim story to the list: The former vice premier of China or someone aiming to protect his image or the Chinese Communist Partys appears to have either abducted or otherwise silenced a former tennis star after she went public with her accusations that he coerced her into sex, and as of this writing, no one knows if shes dead or alive.

Continue reading here:

Year Three of the COVID-19 Pandemic Begins - National Review

Flawed COVID-19 testing protocols for international travel need to be fixed immediately – The Points Guy

November 18, 2021

Flawed COVID-19 testing protocols for international travel need to be fixed immediately

Advertiser Disclosure

Many of the credit card offers that appear on the website are from credit card companies from which ThePointsGuy.com receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). This site does not include all credit card companies or all available credit card offers. Please view our advertising policy page for more information.

Editorial Note: Opinions expressed here are the authors alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Read more:

Flawed COVID-19 testing protocols for international travel need to be fixed immediately - The Points Guy

Page 462«..1020..461462463464..470480..»