Category: Covid-19

Page 321«..1020..320321322323..330340..»

New Numbers Show More Californians are Getting Reinfected With COVID-19 – NBC Bay Area

August 2, 2022

A growing number of Californians are getting COVID-19 a second time.

New state numbers show one out of every seven new cases in July was a reinfection and infectious disease specialists say the highly transmissible variant BA.5 is playing a big role in the increase in reinfections.

Among those reinfected was San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, who announced on Twitter he had COVID for the second time in two months.

According to the new state health department numbers last month, at least 50,000 people came down with COVID for a second time.

We have had an incredible number of infections in our clinics and throughout the city, said Dr. Monica Gandhi, UCSF infectious disease specialist.

Dr. Gandhi said the highly transmissible BA.5 variant is behind many of those reinfections.

I think it's just that BA.5 evades antibodies and that's what protects us from getting infections in our nose and mouth so we are seeing so many more infections with BA.5, she said.

Dr. Gandhi said people are unlikely to get infected twice within a few months with the same variant and the second infection is usually less severe.

She also said President Joe Biden testing positive for COVID again on Saturday, is not considered a reinfection.

That is called a paxlovid rebound. A virus test came out positive in his nose. After taking paxlovid. It doesn't mean he got a new infection, she said.

The Biden administration is pre-purchasing tens of millions of newly formulated "BA.5 specific" boosters expected to be ready for approval in September.

Dr. Ghandi anticipates that this will help reduce the number of COVID reinfections in the future.

Doctors also said it's possible people who already had COVID let their guard down, and quit wearing masks as often, thinking their antibodies will protect them.

That also may have played a role in the number of reinfections.

The rest is here:

New Numbers Show More Californians are Getting Reinfected With COVID-19 - NBC Bay Area

Monterey Peninsula schools carry over relaxed spring COVID-19 protocols – Monterey Herald

August 2, 2022

Masks will not be required in Monterey County schools this year, as schools carry over relaxed spring COVID-19 protocols and prepare for students return this week.

We were able to demonstrate last year that by following the mitigation strategies that are outlined, we can keep schools open and keep kids and staff safe, explained Monterey Peninsula Unified School District Superintendent, PK Diffenbaugh. I have no doubt that we can continue, but we need to stay vigilant and continue the practices that we know to be effective.

Carmel Unified School District Superintendent Ted Knight agreed that because the district relaxed masking requirements earlier this spring, the district and community members feel more comfortable about starting the school year without mask mandates.

Its no different than the end of last year, so you know it settled down, he said. Were continuing to feel comfortable being open for full in-person learning. I think our kids are excited to start the year off a little more normal.

Monterey Countys schools have all emphasized that they will continue to follow the California Department of Public Healths guidelines when it comes to COVID-19 mitigations. The guidance effective July 1, 2022 strongly recommends that all eligible individuals get vaccinated and remain up-to-date to protect themselves and reduce transmission of the virus.

The departments guidelines also recommend that schools improve air quality, teach and reinforce proper handwashing, use antigen tests as the primary option for detecting COVID-19 in schools and provide masks for students, staff and visitors.

The main focus of the guidelines continues to emphasize the importance of implementing effective COVID-19 protocols to keep schools open and reduce disruptions to in-person learning.

Broad disruptions to in-person learning, such as temporary school or classroom closures, due to COVID-19 should remain a last resort and considered only after all available resources have been exhausted and only after conferring with local health officials, the guidelines state.

In a town hall last week for Monterey Peninsula Unified parents and community members, Diffenbaugh addressed the concern that rising cases and new variants could result in school closures.

I can confidently say that the answer to that is no, he said. From everything weve heard from the state, from the local county health department, theyve been very clear that keeping schools open is a priority we know because we did it last year that we can keep our schools safe.

Students and staff of Monterey County schools exposed to the virus will be allowed to continue to take part in all aspects of school including athletics and extracurricular activities regardless of vaccination status, as long as they remain asymptomatic.

Previously, exposed staff members who were unvaccinated or not boosted were required to be quarantined for at least five days following an exposure to the virus. Diffenbaugh pointed out that this rule put a real strain on the school district because of teacher and substitute shortages.

Individuals who have COVID-19 symptoms will be encouraged to wear a mask, get tested immediately and asked to not return to campus until symptoms are mild and improving.

Really, this year since its more about symptoms, we just have a renewed focus on both communicating and then ensuring that kids that have symptoms are not in school, said Knight. Its really just a renewed focus on symptoms and making sure that students stay home when theyre sick and that we have the systems in place to help keep them physically safe and healthy and caught up when they get back.

Schools in the county have also included various ventilation and air quality improvements to the list of their mitigation strategies. Monterey Peninsula Unified equipped each classroom with new HVAC filters and systems to increase airflow, while Pacific Grove Unified School Districts COVID Safety Plan mentions that doors and windows will be opened during school hours and when rooms are occupied to bring in the maximum amount of outdoor air.

Monterey Peninsula Unified also used federal COVID-19 funding to increase its number of health professionals so that each school within the district will have a health professional on campus. The district outlined its plan to increase mental health services at all sites to support students in need as they continue to experience mental health crises from the pandemic.

While everyone 6 months of age and older is now eligible to get a vaccine and everyone 5 years of age and older are eligible for a booster, the California Department of Public Health has said that it will not initiate the regulatory process for a vaccine requirement for the 2022-2023 school year.

While they are not required, Monterey County schools continue to emphasize that masks and vaccines are strongly recommended for students, faculty and staff.

Looking ahead to the 2022-2023 school year, district superintendents say they remain committed to keeping schools safe and preventing any further disruptions to in-person learning.

I think we need to continue to manage through the pandemic. We can wish that it was gone but the reality is, COVID is still here and keeping our schools safe, keeping our staff and students healthy is still a huge priority, said Diffenbaugh. I think our goal is to continue to support families, not just at the school setting but in the community.

See the article here:

Monterey Peninsula schools carry over relaxed spring COVID-19 protocols - Monterey Herald

What is the difference between COVID-19 reinfection, rebound? – NBC4 WCMH-TV

August 2, 2022

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) When it comes to COVID-19, there are two things doctors are keeping an eye on right now: viral rebound and reinfection.

This is after President Joe Biden went back into isolation after testing positive for COVID-19 once again following a recent negative test.

Doctors said its important to know the difference between viral rebound and COVID-19 reinfection as several Ohio counties are facing high levels of COVID-19 and seeing more cases.

Reinfection means youve recovered from COVID in the last 90 days and then you have gotten COVID again, thats reinfection, said Dr. Mahdee Sobhanie, an infectious disease doctor with the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Rebound is that same course of the illness and you have the virus come back.

Sobhanie and Dr. Joseph Gastaldo with OhioHealth both said it is important to know the difference between the two.

The White House said Biden is currently experiencing a viral rebound after treating COVID-19 with Paxlovid, the COVID-19 pill.

We dont know the exact cause of why that happens, Gastaldo said. Its believed that Paxlovid really inhibits the virus replication so much that after the Paxlovid five-day course ends, theres residual virus and it begins replicating again, resulting in a positive test.

Gastaldo added people who rebound are considered contagious. Doctors are also worried about reinfection.

They said if you had COVID earlier this year, you could get sick again and test positive because of the BA.5 variant.

When you get a test done, whether it be an antigen test or a PCR test, you dont know what variant you got infected with, Gastaldo said.

Both doctors are urging communities to remain vigilant when it comes to COVID and protective measures like masking and testing.

We saw what happened in the Delta wave, you know? Sobhanie said. So thats why if you do get reinfected, the vaccines do a much better job in protecting you, especially if youre up to date on your vaccines including boosters.

Doctors said Paxlovid is still a good treatment to keep patients out of the hospital.

Both said more real-time data is needed to know how many people could be impacted by a viral rebound in the future.

Continued here:

What is the difference between COVID-19 reinfection, rebound? - NBC4 WCMH-TV

Study finds negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health status in low and middle income countries – News-Medical.Net

August 2, 2022

Scientists worldwide have recently conducted a large-scale survey to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on mental health issues in low-to-middle income countries.

Significant seasonal variation in mental health conditions has been observed during the pandemic. A detailed survey report is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has severely hit the global healthcare system and economy, with the highest impact in low- and middle-income countries. The pandemic has caused more than 572million infections and over 6.3 million deaths worldwide.

A considerable economic deprivation together with the fear of COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality has increased mental health issues, including anxiety, stress, depression, and anguish, in the global general population throughout the pandemic. Moreover, pandemic-related movement restrictions and lockdowns have added extra burden onmental health conditions.

In the current study, the scientists conducted several rounds of pre- and during-pandemic surveys in eight low-to-middle income countries to understand the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health conditions.

The surveys were conducted on 21,162 individuals from eight low-to-middle income countries, including Asian, African, and South American countries (Bangladesh, Nepal, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone). Many rounds of surveys were done in pre-pandemic and during-pandemic periods.

The findings of the surveys were correlated with the timing of lean season and onset of the pandemic. In agricultural regions of low-to-middle income countries, lean season refers to the period between planting and harvesting when income and food insecurities increase due to lack of job opportunities and crop scarcities.

The seasonal variation in depression was assessed by specifically focusing on two countries, namely, Nepal and Kenya. The survey findings of both countries showed a positive tread in mental health status before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In Nepal, mental health status in the initial phase of the pandemic (April 2020) was considerably lower than the pre-pandemic average. However, it improved with the progression of pandemic. No significant difference in food security was observed between the pre- and post-lean season period (between April and October of a typical year).

In kenya, a contrasting trend was observed, which demonstrated a significant improvement in food security in October of a typical year compared to that in April. Considering the seasonal food security trend, the survey analysis revealed that the improvement in mental health status observed with the progression of the pandemic is not solely due to the declining effects of the pandemic. Seasonal food security also contributes significantly to this improvement.

Two time periods were included in the survey analysis to understand the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. While a time period of 0 4 months after the onset of thepandemic was considered to assess the short-term impact of the pandemic, a more persistent impact was determined by considering a time period of more than four months after the pandemic onset.

During the initial phase of the pandemic (within four months), a significant decline in mental health status was observed across the surveyed countries. However, an improving trend in mental health was observed with the progression of the pandemic (after four months).

After adjusting for seasonal variation in mental health status, the findings revealed a significant long-lasting negative impact of the pandemic on mental health.

The current large-scale survey conducted in multiple low-to-middle countries highlights the significant negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health issues, especially depression. This observation holds significance even after adjusting for seasonal fluctuations in mental health status and timing of the pandemic's onset.

Notably, the study demonstrates a clear association between food insecurity and poor mental health status. Based on this observation, the scientists indicate that the actual impact of the pandemic on mental health status in agricultural societies can only be determined by considering seasonal fluctuations.

Moreover, the researchershighlight the need for increasing affordability and accessibility of mental health support services in low-to-middle income countries to reduce the risk of long-term mental health consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

View post:

Study finds negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health status in low and middle income countries - News-Medical.Net

Rand Paul vows to get answers on COVID-19 origins in gain-of-function hearing – Fox News

August 2, 2022

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., announced the first ever hearing on gain-of-function research, which will be aimed at pinning down the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Throughout this pandemic, Dr. Rand Paul has led the effort to hold government officials accountable on the status of efforts being made to combat COVID-19, and the origins of this virus that has killed over 6 million people worldwide," a spokesperson for Paul told Fox News Digital. "This has been over a year-long process of getting Congressional Democrats to finally agree to a hearing, which will also be the first Congressional hearing on gain-of-function research. Dr. Paul looks forward to working with Subcommittee Chairwoman Hassan and hearing from expert witnesses during this critically important hearing that shouldve happened long ago."

The hearing, which is scheduled for Wednesday, comes a week after the Kentucky senator attempted to pass an amendment to the CHIPS-Plus Act that would have banned U.S. funding of gain-of-function research in China, with Democrats objecting to the amendment despite it passing unanimously in an earlier version of the bill last year.

In remarks on the floor of the Senate last week, Paul argued that there was significant evidence that the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic could be traced to a lab in Wuhan, China.

RAND PAUL SENDS MESSAGE TO FAUCI: YOU'LL HAVE TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH IF GOP WINS

Sen. Rand Paul speaks during a COVID-19 federal response hearing on Capitol Hill. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

"Gain-of-function research enhances the severity or transmissibility of existing viruses that may infect humans," Paul said. "The dangers are so acute that from 2014-2017, the National Institutes of Health suspended funding for all gain-of-function projects the emergence of COVID serves as a reminder that dangerous research conducted in a secretive and totalitarian country is simply too risky to fund."

Paul also sent a letter to the acting director of the National Institutes of Health, Lawrence A. Tabak, last week to demand the agency be more transparent on the origins of COVID-19, arguing that NIH has "repeatedly disregarded its responsibilities" under the Freedom of Information Act.

"Of particular concern is NIH's recent admission in Court that the agency is withholding portions of emails between employees because they could be used out of context and serve to amplify the already prevalent misinformation regarding the origins of the coronavirus pandemic,'" Paul said in the letter. "This suggests NIH is censoring the information it releases to the public about the origins of the pandemic."

Paul has had several clashes with public health officials throughout the pandemic, including several confrontations with Dr. Anthony Fauci, who currently serves as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the chief medical adviser to President Biden.

Dr. Anthony Fauci responds to questions from Sen. Rand Paul at a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing on Capitol Hill. (Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Most recently, Paul told Fox News that Fauci would be forced to testify under oath regarding the pandemic if the Republican Party takes control of Congress after the midterm elections.

"If he's in public employment, we will subpoena him," Paul said. "He will have to appear and testify under oath. If Republicans take charge of the House or the Senate or both, he will have to testify under oath because a million Americans died. And we want to know about was there a cover-up in trying to suppress any link to the lab in China?"

Michael Lee is a writer at Fox News. Follow him on Twitter @UAMichaelLee

Here is the original post:

Rand Paul vows to get answers on COVID-19 origins in gain-of-function hearing - Fox News

Additional hours added to Easthampton COVID-19 testing site – WWLP.com

August 2, 2022

EASTHAMPTON, Mass. (WWLP) The Easthampton Health Department announced Monday that they will be adding an extra day for anyone in need of a COVID-19 test.

Residents will now be able to get tested on Wednesdays at the Millside Park COVID-19 testing site. The new scheduled hours will be the following:

Walks-ins are welcomes at the site, but pre-registration is recommended.

Visit link:

Additional hours added to Easthampton COVID-19 testing site - WWLP.com

Study Finds mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and One Booster Dose May Not Fully Protect against Breakthrough Case of Omicron Variant in People with Autoimmune…

August 2, 2022

In people with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs), such as lupus, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and booster dose may not provide broad protection from developing a breakthrough infection (an infection with a virus after you have been vaccinated) of the Omicron variant. A new study finds the mRNA vaccine does not create sufficient antibodies to neutralize a response to (or fully protect against) Omicron.

The blood samples of 94 healthy healthcare workers and 149 people with ARDs, including lupus, were collected. Researchers examined the blood response to Omicron at 15 weeks after a second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose or 8 weeks after receiving a third mRNA dose or booster.

People with ARDs exhibited lower response or protection after the second dose to Omicron (11.5%) than the healthy healthcare workers (18.1%). After the third dose, a significant difference in response was observed 26.8% in people with ARDs versus 50.3% in the healthy group. Within six weeks, significantly lower Omicron-neutralizing responses were observed in the ARDs group compared to the healthcare workers.

The results of this study do not mean that the COVID-19 vaccine is no longer effective for people with lupus. But it does highlight that as the virus changes, further research is needed to examine vaccine efficacy in people with autoimmune diseases. Talk to your healthcare provider about COVID-19 vaccination and/or booster shots and about whether you should continue to take other precautions, such as wearing a mask. Learn more about the COVID-19 vaccine and lupus.

Read the study

Read the original post:

Study Finds mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and One Booster Dose May Not Fully Protect against Breakthrough Case of Omicron Variant in People with Autoimmune...

New methods tripled COVID-19 testing in Latinx communities – AroundtheO

August 2, 2022

Using newly developed and culturally informed methods, a UO team was able to more than triple the number of Latinx people getting tested for COVID-19, according to a recently published research paper.

In a new Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open paper, researchers in the UOs Prevention Science Institute shared their findings from a study on COVID-19 testing outreach in the Oregon Latinx community. The results could shape outreach to Latinx communities across the country as well as suggest ways to tailor outreach to any group.

This was the most challenging and rewarding work of my career, said Dave DeGarmo, an associate research professor in the Prevention Science Institute. I was really motivated to respond.

The research, which also used the Cresko Laboratory at the UO, used a randomized trial of 33 COVID-19 testing sites, which found that intervention by community health promoters was associated with 3.84 times more Latinx individuals tested per event than control sites and was associated with testing a higher rate of the Latinx population in Oregon.

When the pandemic hit in 2020, DeGarmo and his research team were well-situated to respond to the question of why some populations in Oregon had higher testing rates than others, something that correlated directly with deaths. The Latinx community represents 13 percent of Oregons population, but in the early months of the pandemic it made up 35 percent of cases and three times more deaths.

The worse the rates of testing, the worse the mortality, DeGarmo said. So getting more effective testing, making it accessible and getting that outreach into the communities, that translates to saving lives.

DeGarmos research at the UO applies a statistical approach to stressful situations in families, such as divorce, military deployments and single fathers.

For its study, the research team received funding from the National Institutes of Health through the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics initiative, which was launched to develop rapid and accurate testing and increase test availability nationwide.

DeGarmo and his team then designed a study to test outreach methods. The team worked quickly and had to create testing sites to try out their theories for outreach.

It required a lot of coordination. Fast coordination, said Camille Cioffi, a research associate at the institute.

Cioffi, who grew up in Eugene and graduated from the UO in 2020, knew she wanted to jump right into research that would help save lives during the pandemic.

This just felt like the right thing to do, more than anything, she said.

Unlike most other researchers, members of the Prevention Science Institute team couldnt rely on existing facilities at the UO. They had to hire and train staff and develop the field-testing methods from the ground up because the outreach was in places with varied needs across the state.

Like everything with the pandemic, we just had to do it ourselves because what we needed didnt exist yet, Cioffi said.

The team set up testing sites across the state, coordinating with community partners in the Latinx community. Some sites had testing coordinated with outdoor outreach, food box distribution locations, and using social media methods that are popular in the Latinx community.

One of the surprising things for him on the project was the extent of the info-demic, referring to the widespread occurrence of misinformation about COVID-19.

I was surprised by the anti-immigrant rhetoric, the misinformation, the distrust of science, the politics, he said. It really delayed our (countrys) reaction to the pandemic.

The pandemic changed things for everyone, of course. But for DeGarmo, the research project was not only an urgent answer to a public health crisis, but also a personal one. He lost his mother to COVID-19.

I havent talked about this much, especially with my UO colleagues, he said. Some people might not know this. My mother was Mexican, so Im half-Mexican. Losing her, I think that motivated me even more to do something for the Latinx community.

Leslie Leve, associate director of the Prevention Science Institute, said research like DeGarmos can only be achieved with true partnerships, not only within the UO in this case between the Prevention Science Institute, the Genomics and Cell Characterization Core Facility and the Cresko Lab but between the UO and community, county and state agencies. We are grateful to our external partners who made this study possible, including the Oregon Health Authority, county public health departments across the state, and community-based agencies in Oregon that serve Latinx communities.

DeGarmo sees more work to be done as COVID-19 becomes endemic.

We will be living with this for a while, he said. It is still wise to mask up, especially while traveling.

By Emmily Bristol, Office of the Provost

Follow this link:

New methods tripled COVID-19 testing in Latinx communities - AroundtheO

COVID-19 Pandemic Dramatically Increased Childcare Stress Among Health Care Workers – Pharmacy Times

August 2, 2022

Researchers found high levels of childcare stress among female and racial minority health care workers, supporting new programs and wellbeing initiatives.

A September 2021 poll revealed that 1 in 5 health care workers (HCWs) quit their job since March 2020. Pre-existing disparities and issues in the health care workforce and within the current childcare system were exacerbated because of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the poll.

Researchers found that childcare stress (CCS) was associated with anxiety, depression, burnout (occupational stress), intent to reduce (ITR), and intent to leave (ITL) for HCWs, which were experienced at disproportionate levels across different subgroups.

The source of the study, called Coping with COVID, is a 14-item survey looking at several demographic items, such as race, ethnicity, gender, years in practice, outpatient vs inpatient practice environment, and work role between April-December 2020.

Although many questions were asked for HCWs to self-evaluate, the only item that was used to analyze CCS was the statement, due toCOVID-19, I am experiencing concerns about childcare.

A total of 58,408 participants answered this question using a scale between 1 and 4. A participant experienced CCS if they answered 3 or 4 on the scale. If the answer was 1, there was no CCS, and if they responded 4, they experienced a high degree of CCS.

The findings highlighted that racial and ethnic minority groups experienced CCS 40%-50% more than white respondents. Women also had 22% greater odds of reporting CCS than men; however, burnout was significant among all high CCS respondents. Although all workers with CCS were 80% more likely to have burnout than their low CCS counterparts, women reported burnout with 50% greater odds than men.

Other models further revealed that ITR for HCWs was higher in women than men, but any worker experiencing CCS was 91% more likely to report ITR. Additionally, logistical regressions for all workers noted similar ITL in both men and women.

All participants with CCS were more than 100% more likely to be anxious or depressed. Similar to the ITR and ITL findings, women were more likely to experience these symptoms.

The researchers noted a significant study limitation around the findings being based on self-reported answers. Other limitations include an unequivocal ratio of responders, a chaotic and unusual situation due to the pandemic, and confounding associations between CCS and whether it influenced burnout, or whether burnout influenced facets, such as ITL and ITR.

CCS was ultimately more prevalent in women HCWs, racial and ethnic minority groups, and people who have been in practice for more than 5 years. Researchers propose collecting more data on racial equity and increasing accessible childcare for HCW well-being. With an intentional approach, the health care workplace should address these childcare concerns.

Reference

Elizabeth M. Harry, MD,; Lindsey E. Carlasare, MBA; Christine A. Sinsky, MD; et al. Childcare Stress, Burnout, and Intent to Reduce Hours or Leave the Job During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among US Health Care Workers. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2221776. doi:10.1001. Accessed July 19, 2022.

See more here:

COVID-19 Pandemic Dramatically Increased Childcare Stress Among Health Care Workers - Pharmacy Times

Page 321«..1020..320321322323..330340..»