Category: Covid-19 Vaccine

Page 83«..1020..82838485..90100..»

Limited supply of two types of COVID-19 vaccine now available at … – La Grande Observer

October 21, 2023

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Read more from the original source:

Limited supply of two types of COVID-19 vaccine now available at ... - La Grande Observer

13 Reasons Patients Give for Not Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine Booster – Patient Care Online

October 21, 2023

If your patients have been slow to get COVID-19 booster shots, here are some of the prevailing reasons why.

In a new study, researchers noted bivalent boosters were recommended for every aged 12 years and older since September 2022. That expanded to all people aged 6 months and older as of December last year.

But as of May 2023, fewer that 20% of eligible people had received updated boosters. Thats a critical public health challenge, study authors wrote in Understanding low COVID-19 booster uptake among US adults, published in the journal Vaccine.

In February and March 2023, researchers led by the University of Arizona Cancer Center surveyed 2196 adults who had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

The poll asked the question: Have you received the updated (bivalent, omicron) mRNA booster from Pfizer or Moderna?

Among them, 1637, or 74.5%, had received the booster, but 559 did not. To explain why, participants could select one or multiple answers, or write in their own. Responses fell into 3 groups:

Interventions to improve vaccination rates require a variety of approaches, the study said. A good start is to consider the top reasons why some participants opted not to get their COVID-19 booster.

Source: Jacobs ET, Cordova-Marks FM, Farland LV, et al. Understanding low COVID-19 booster uptake among US adults. Vaccine. 2023;41(6):6221-6226. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.080

Read more here:

13 Reasons Patients Give for Not Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine Booster - Patient Care Online

Use of Updated COVID-19 Vaccines 20232024 Formula for … – CDC

October 21, 2023

On October 10, 2023, this report was posted online as an MMWR Early Release.

Joanna J. Regan, MD1; Danielle L. Moulia, MPH1; Ruth Link-Gelles, PhD1; Monica Godfrey, MPH1; Josephine Mak, MPH1; Morgan Najdowski, MPH1,2; Hannah G. Rosenblum, MD1; Melisa M. Shah, MD1; Evelyn Twentyman, MD1; Sarah Meyer, MD1; Georgina Peacock, MD1; Natalie Thornburg, PhD1; Fiona P. Havers, MD1; Sharon Saydah, PhD1; Oliver Brooks, MD3; H. Keipp Talbot, MD4; Grace M. Lee, MD5; Beth P. Bell, MD6; Barbara E. Mahon, MD1; Matthew F. Daley, MD7; Katherine E. Fleming-Dutra, MD1; Megan Wallace, DrPH1 (View author affiliations)

What is already known about this topic?

Since September 2022, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended in the United States, but the variants these vaccines were designed to protect against are no longer circulating widely. In September and October 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved and authorized updated 20232024 Formula monovalent XBB.1.5 componentcontaining COVID-19 vaccines, formulated to target current variants more closely, specifically Omicron variant XBB.1.5, for persons aged 6 months.

What is added by this report?

On September 12, 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended vaccination with updated COVID-19 vaccines for all persons aged 6 months.

What are the implications for public health practice?

The updated COVID-19 vaccines are meant to broaden vaccine-induced immunity and provide protection against the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 XBB-sublineage variants including against severe COVID-19associated illness and death.

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

COVID-19 vaccines protect against severe COVID-19associated outcomes, including hospitalization and death. As SARS-CoV-2 has evolved, and waning vaccine effectiveness has been noted, vaccine formulations and policies have been updated to provide continued protection against severe illness and death from COVID-19. Since September 2022, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended in the United States, but the variants these vaccines protect against are no longer circulating widely. On September 11, 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the updated (20232024 Formula) COVID-19 mRNA vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech for persons aged 12 years and authorized these vaccines for persons aged 6 months11 years under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). On October 3, 2023, FDA authorized the updated COVID-19 vaccine by Novavax for use in persons aged 12 years under EUA. The updated COVID-19 vaccines include a monovalent XBB.1.5 component, which is meant to broaden vaccine-induced immunity and provide protection against currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 XBB-sublineage variants including against severe COVID-19associated illness and death. On September 12, 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended vaccination with updated COVID-19 vaccines for all persons aged 6 months. These recommendations will be reviewed as new evidence becomes available or new vaccines are approved and might be updated.

By the end of 2022, COVID-19 vaccines had prevented 18.5 million COVID-19 hospitalizations and 3.2 million COVID-19 deaths in the United States (1). As SARS-CoV-2 has evolved, and waning vaccine effectiveness (VE) has been observed, vaccine formulations and policies have been updated to provide continued protection against severe COVID-19associated illness and death. On September 11, 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the updated (20232024 Formula) COVID-19 mRNA vaccines by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech for use in persons aged 6 months11 years under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and approved the updated Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines for persons aged 12 years (2). On October 3, 2023, FDA authorized the updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine for use in persons aged 12 years under EUA (2). The updated COVID-19 vaccines include a monovalent XBB.1.5 component and are meant to broaden vaccine-induced immunity and provide increased protection (compared with protection from earlier vaccines that might have waned) against currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 XBB-sublineage variants, which, by September 2, 2023, accounted for >99% of sequenced SARS-CoV-2 specimens in the United States.* As of September 11, 2023, bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (based on the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and BA.4/BA.5 variants) are no longer authorized for use in the United States, and as of October 3, 2023, original monovalent Novavax COVID-19 vaccines (based on the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain) are no longer authorized for use in the United States. On September 12, 2023, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended vaccination with the updated COVID-19 vaccine for all persons aged 6 months. These recommendations will be reviewed as new evidence becomes available or new vaccines are approved and might be updated.

Although severe COVID-19 is now less prevalent in the United States than during previous years, it continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in this country. Currently, older adults (aged 65 years) and infants aged <6 months are at highest risk for COVID-19associated hospitalization. During January 1August 26, 2023, COVID-19associated hospitalization rates among adults aged 75 years were two to three times as high as those among the next youngest age group (adults aged 6574 years). Rates among infants aged <6 months are similar to those among adults aged 6574 years (3).

Nevertheless, persons aged 6 months64 years, including those with no underlying medical conditions, remain at risk for severe COVID-19. Rates of COVID-19associated hospitalization are currently lowest among children and adolescents aged 517 years. However, among persons in this age group who were hospitalized with COVID-19 during JanuaryJune 2023, 23% of those aged 511 years and 34% of those aged 1217 years had no underlying medical conditions. During January 2022June 2023, among children and adolescents aged 17 years who died during a COVID-19 hospitalization, 50% had no underlying condition. During January 1July 22, 2023, a total of 28,140 persons, including 26 aged <1 year, 18 aged 14 years, 36 aged 519 years, 463 aged 1544 years, 2,821 aged 4564 years, and 24,776 aged 65 years, died from COVID-19, as evidenced by COVID-19 being listed as the underlying cause of death on the death certificate.

PostCOVID-19 conditions contribute to COVID-19related morbidity among all age groups. The prevalence of ongoing symptoms 3 months after COVID-19 illness ranged from <1% among persons aged <18 years to 5% among those aged 3549 years. During June 719, 2023, approximately one in four adults with postCOVID-19 conditions reported significant activity limitations (4).

Members of racial and ethnic minority groups continue to be disproportionately affected by COVID-19associated hospitalization (5). Higher prevalences of underlying conditions in some racial and ethnic minority populations might increase their risk for severe COVID-19associated outcomes (6). As of May 10, 2023, only 17% of the U.S. population had received a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine dose, with lower coverage among some racial and ethnic minority populations, potentially driven by differences in vaccine access and acceptability (5,7).

After declining throughout the spring and early summer of 2023, COVID-19associated hospitalization rates began increasing in mid-July 2023. Further increases are anticipated during the fall and winter respiratory virus season (5).

Since June 2020, ACIP has convened 37 public meetings to review data relevant to the potential use of COVID-19 vaccines. The ACIP COVID-19 Vaccine Work Group, comprising experts in adult and pediatric medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, infectious diseases, vaccinology, vaccine safety, public health, and ethics, has met weekly to review COVID-19 surveillance data; evidence regarding immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines; and implementation considerations. The Work Group conducted a systematic review of benefits and harms of vaccination, and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to assess the certainty of the evidence regarding benefits and harms associated with a bivalent vaccine administered in the United States during September 2022April 2023. The Work Group selected this population, intervention, and pandemic period of high seroprevalence to identify evidence most applicable to what can be anticipated from this years vaccine in the United States. The certainty of evidence was assessed separately for infants and children aged 6 months11 years, and adolescents and adults aged 12 years based on the difference in recommended vaccine dosage for these two age groups. The Work Group also reviewed additional CDC data on VE and safety, as well as data on the updated vaccines provided by manufacturers (810). To assess the evidence for benefits and harms associated with COVID-19 vaccine use, and to guide deliberations, ACIP uses the Evidence to Recommendations (EtR) Framework.** Within this framework, ACIP considered the importance of COVID-19 as a public health problem, including during the Omicron XBB-lineagepredominant era (January 2023September 2023), as well as issues of resource use, benefits and harms, patients values, acceptability, feasibility, and equity related to vaccine use. ACIP evaluated data related to all vaccines for which updated 20232024 formulations were anticipated (i.e., Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer-BioNTech).

Published assessments of previous vaccine formulations VE and safety were evaluated using GRADE. GRADE is used to assess the confidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) that the true effect lies close to that of the estimated effect. Evidence that includes only randomized controlled trials begins at high certainty, whereas evidence that includes observational data begins at low certainty.

Among adolescents and adults, benefits of bivalent vaccination were assessed using pooled observational VE data for three outcomes: medically attended COVID-19, hospitalization attributed to COVID-19, and death attributed to COVID-19. Pooled VE against medically attended COVID-19 was 53% (95% CI=50%56%), and hospitalization attributed to COVID-19 was 48% (95% CI=30%61%). For both critical outcomes, the certainty assessment was low. Pooled VE against death attributed to COVID-19 was 61% (95% CI=41%74%), and the certainty assessment was very low because of serious concern for inconsistency. Among infants and children, insufficient observational data were identified for a systematic review of benefits, but benefits were indirectly inferred from adolescent and adult data. The certainty assessment was very low for all three outcomes because of serious concern for indirectness.

Studies from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a postauthorization vaccine safety monitoring system, were used to assess rates of serious adverse events (i.e., myocarditis or pericarditis and anaphylaxis, which were the outcomes specified for GRADE) that have been associated with vaccination (myocarditis after receipt of COVID-19 vaccine has been reported primarily in adolescent and young adult males) (11), and the certainty assessment was low among adolescents and adults and very low among infants and children. Severe reactogenicity (grade 3*** local or systemic reactions) was assessed using pooled clinical trial data after any original monovalent primary series dose. Severe reactogenicity occurred more often in the vaccine than placebo study arms, and the certainty assessment for the clinical trial body of evidence was low because of very serious concern for indirectness in both age groups. The GRADE evidence profile is available at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-2023-2024-Monovalent.html.

Additional, updated CDC VE data were also reviewed, including data showing patterns of waning bivalent vaccineinduced immunity against infection and COVID-19associated hospitalization during a period with increased Omicron XBB sublineage circulation (12,13). During September 2022August 2023, VE against hospitalization among adults aged 65 years without an immunocompromising condition waned from 67% (95% CI=62%71%) at 759 days postvaccination to 28% (95% CI=18%36%) at 60119 days (13). VE of both the original monovalent and bivalent vaccines against critical outcomes (invasive mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, or death) has remained more durable than VE against less severe outcomes among adults, including those with and without immunocompromising conditions (12,14). VE patterns were similar among children and adults, although available data were more limited in children (13,15). VE against emergency department and urgent care visits among persons aged 517 years ranged from 59%63% by age group 759 days after a bivalent dose, waning to 36%47% by age group 60119 days after a bivalent dose (13). VE has historically been lower and has waned more quickly among adults with immunocompromise than among immunocompetent adults, although bivalent VE trends are less clear (12,13).

Additional, updated data on COVID-19 vaccine safety from VSD were also reviewed. The risk for myocarditis or pericarditis after receipt of a bivalent vaccine dose is uncertain because myocarditis is a rare outcome, and bivalent vaccination coverage is relatively low, especially in adolescents and young adults. Myocarditis rates after booster doses in adolescent and young adult males are lower than rates after primary series vaccination, but estimates for monovalent booster and bivalent doses are limited by the lower numbers of doses administered in VSD in this group (16). A longer interval between doses has been associated with lower rates of myocarditis (17).

ACIP recommendations for the updated COVID-19 vaccines were also guided by data on immunogenicity provided by the vaccine manufacturers. Data from Moderna, Novavax, and Pfizer-BioNTech show that monovalent XBB componentcontaining COVID-19 vaccines increase the immune response against the currently circulating XBB-sublineage variants (810). The evidence used to guide EtR is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/recs/grade/covid-19-2023-2024-Monovalent-etr.html.

COVID-19 vaccination is a cost-effective intervention, particularly in adults aged 65 years, among whom incidence is highest. For this age group, a dose of the vaccine is cost saving (at an assumed cost of $120 per dose). Among adults aged 5064 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of updated COVID-19 vaccines was estimated to be $25,787 per quality-adjusted life year, with estimates in those aged 50 years robust to input changes across plausible ranges (18). For adults aged 1849 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for updated COVID-19 vaccines was estimated to be $115,588 per quality-adjusted life year, although estimates in younger adults were more sensitive to changes in input, with higher VE or hospitalization rates increasing cost-effectiveness (18). Cost-effectiveness estimates are not yet available for pediatric populations (18).

On September 12, 2023, ACIP recommended vaccination with the updated (20232024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine for all persons aged 6 months. The recommendation is inclusive of FDA-licensed or authorized updated monovalent XBB componentcontaining COVID-19 vaccines (i.e., Moderna, Novavax and Pfizer-BioNTech updated COVID-19 vaccines), consistent with the FDA-licensed indication or EUA. The recommendation for children aged 6 months11 years is an interim recommendation because the updated COVID-19 vaccines for this age group are currently authorized under EUA. In addition, the recommendation for the updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is an interim recommendation because the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is currently authorized under EUA.

Infants and children aged 6 months4 years are recommended to receive a multidose initial series (previously referred to as the primary series) and at least 1 updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose depending on vaccination history as defined herein. Infants and children aged 6 months4 years who are unvaccinated are recommended to receive either 2 updated Moderna COVID-19 vaccine doses or 3 updated Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine doses (Table 1). Infants and children aged 6 months4 years who previously received original monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine doses are recommended to receive 1 or 2 homologous (i.e., from the same manufacturer) updated COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, depending on vaccine manufacturer and the number of previous vaccine doses received. Infants and children aged 6 months4 years who completed the initial series with original monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine doses are recommended to receive 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine dose, at least 2 months after receipt of the last COVID-19 vaccine dose. Infants and children aged 6 months4 years may receive either the updated Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; however, all doses administered to an infant or child in this age group should be from the same manufacturer.

For those receiving updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, persons aged 5 years without immunocompromise are recommended to receive 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine dose, irrespective of previous COVID-19 vaccination history (Table 2). For those receiving updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccines, persons ages 12 years without immunocompromise are recommended to receive 2 updated COVID-19 vaccine doses if previously unvaccinated and 1 updated dose if previously vaccinated with any COVID-19 vaccine. For those who have received previous COVID-19 vaccines, the updated vaccine should be administered 2 months after receipt of the most recent dose.

Unvaccinated persons aged 6 months11 years who are moderately or severely immunocompromised are recommended to receive an initial vaccination series of 3 homologous updated (20232024 Formula) mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses. Unvaccinated persons aged 12 years who are moderately or severely immunocompromised can complete an initial vaccination series with 3 homologous doses of updated mRNA or 2 doses of updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. Persons aged 6 months who are moderately or severely immunocompromised and previously received 1 or 2 original monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine doses are recommended to receive 1 or 2 homologous updated COVID-19 vaccine doses, depending on the number of previous vaccine doses. Persons aged 6 months who are moderately or severely immunocompromised who previously received 3 original monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine doses are recommended to receive 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine dose. Persons aged 12 years who are moderately or severely immunocompromised and who previously received original Novavax COVID-19 vaccine or Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine, including those who also received original monovalent or bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses, are recommended to receive 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine dose from any FDA-authorized or approved manufacturer.

Persons who are moderately or severely immunocompromised, have completed an initial series, and have received 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine dose, may receive additional updated COVID-19 vaccine doses, guided by the clinical judgment of a health care provider and personal preference and circumstances. Any further additional doses should be administered 2 months after the last COVID-19 vaccine dose. Additional clinical considerations, including detailed schedules and tables by age and vaccination history for those who are and are not moderately or severely immunocompromised, are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html.

COVID-19 vaccines are transitioning from federal procurement and distribution into the commercial marketplace during fall 2023. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), ACIP recommendations for routine immunization that have been adopted by CDC and are listed on CDC Immunization Schedules are required to be covered by group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health insurance coverage without cost-sharing requirements. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act expedited coverage for COVID-19 vaccines; since January 5, 2021, ACA-covered insurers must cover, without cost sharing, any COVID-19 vaccine FDA authorized under an EUA or FDA approved under a Biologics License Application immediately upon authorization or approval of the vaccine (19). Thus, for U.S. residents with applicable ACA commercial medical insurance coverage, COVID-19 vaccines will be covered immediately. In addition, COVID-19 vaccines are covered under Medicare Part B, and nearly all Medicaid beneficiaries can receive COVID-19 vaccines without cost-sharing. COVID-19 vaccines are also included in the Vaccines for Children Program,**** which provides vaccines to approximately one half of U.S. persons aged <19 years at no cost. The Bridge Access Program for COVID-19 Vaccines is a public-private partnership serving as a temporary measure to maintain access to COVID-19 vaccines for adults who are uninsured or underinsured, working through both public health clinics and participating retail pharmacies. Before vaccination, providers should provide the EUA Fact Sheet, manufacturers package insert, or other written materials regarding the vaccine being administered and counsel vaccine recipients about expected systemic and local adverse reactions (reactogenicity).

Adverse events after vaccination should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Reporting is encouraged for any clinically significant adverse event even if it is uncertain whether the vaccine caused the event. Information on how to submit a report to VAERS is available at https://vaers.hhs.gov or by telephone at 1-800-822-7967.

Karen Broder, Mary Chamberland, Susan Goldstein, Andrew Leidner, Kadam Patel, Jamison Pike, Tom Shimabukuro, John Su, Christopher Taylor, Eric Weintraub, Melinda Wharton, Fangjun Zhou, CDC. Voting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (in addition to listed authors): Lynn Bahta, Minnesota Department of Health; Wilbur Chen, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Sybil Cineas, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University; Camille Kotton, Harvard Medical School; James Loehr, Cayuga Family Medicine; Sarah Long, Drexel University College of Medicine; Veronica V. McNally, Franny Strong Foundation; Katherine A. Poehling, Wake Forest School of Medicine; Pablo J. Snchez, The Research Institute at Nationwide Childrens Hospital. Members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group: Edward Belongia, Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute; Henry Bernstein, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Cohen Childrens Medical Center; Dayna Bowen Matthew, George Washington University Law School; Uzo Chukwuma, Indian Health Service; Paul Cieslak, Christine Hahn, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; Richard Dang, American Pharmacists Association; Jeffrey Duchin, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Kathy Edwards, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Sandra Fryhofer, American Medical Association; Jason M. Goldman, American College of Physicians; Robert Hopkins, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Michael Ison, Chris Roberts, National Institutes of Health; Lisa Jackson, Jennifer Nelson, Kaiser Permanente; Denise Jamieson, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Jeffery Kelman, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; Kathy Kinlaw, Center for Ethics, Emory University; Alan Lam, U.S. Department of Defense; Lucia Lee, Anuga Rastogi, Rachel Zhang, Food and Drug Administration; Valerie Marshall, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Preeti Mehrotra, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Kathleen Neuzil, Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine; Sean OLeary, American Academy of Pediatrics; Christine Oshansky, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; Stanley Perlman, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa; Marcus Plescia, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials; Rob Schechter, National Foundation for Infectious Diseases; Kenneth Schmader, American Geriatrics Society; Peter Szilagyi, University of California, Los Angeles; Jonathan Temte, American Academy of Family Physicians; Matthew Tunis, National Advisory Committee on Immunization Secretariat, Public Health Agency of Canada; Matt Zahn, National Association of County and City Health Officials. Nicola P. Klein, Kaiser Permanente Northern California; Cara B. Janusz, Lisa Posser, Angela Rose, University of Michigan.

1National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 2Eagle Health Analytics, San Antonio, Texas; 3Watts Healthcare Corporation, Los Angeles, California; 4Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; 5Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 6University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; 7Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado,

Suggested citation for this article: Regan JJ, Moulia DL, Link-Gelles R, et al. Use of Updated COVID-19 Vaccines 20232024 Formula for Persons Aged 6 Months: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices United States, September 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:11401146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7242e1.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Excerpt from:

Use of Updated COVID-19 Vaccines 20232024 Formula for ... - CDC

Vaccine refusal linked to mistrust in health authorities – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

October 21, 2023

Refusal of COVID-19 vaccines has been a feature of the pandemic since the vaccines were first made available in late winter 2020 and early 2021.

In a new study in JAMA Network Open, authors review 28,000 interviews on vaccine uptake and hesitancy conducted in Hong Kong and Singapore from February 2020 through January 2022 to determine what was driving vaccine refusal.

Until the Omicron wave in late 2021 and early 2022, Hong Kong had one of the lowest COVID-19 prevalence rates across the globe. But with Omicron, death tolls in Hong Kong soared to 39.3 million people per day, the highest death toll in the world.

While Hong Kongs cumulative COVID-19 deaths per capita remain lower than the UK and US, it has far exceeded high-income economies in Asia-Pacific.

"While Hong Kongs cumulative COVID-19 deaths per capita remain lower than the UK and US, it has far exceeded high-income economies in Asia-Pacific," the authors said. This was likely linked to low vaccine uptake: 82.4% of adults in Hong Kong aged 80 years and older were unvaccinated or had received only one dose during the Omicron BA.2 variant phase of the pandemic, compared to just 9.0% of adults in in Singapore

The authors of the present study used 20 waves of questionnaires and data to understand the vaccine refusal and compared results to those seen in Singapore, which had one of the highest rates of vaccine uptake in Asia.

Participants came from the FAMILY Cohort, a prospective population-based cohort study in Hong Kong. The group was asked about vaccination in the decade before and during the pandemic. In total, 28,007 interviews were included.

In 2020, approximately two-thirds (65.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7% to 68.6%) of adults in Hong Kong said they would be willing to vaccinate when a vaccine became available, the authors found. But vaccination willingness dropped to 55.0% when vaccines were procured from foreign nations.

Willingness dropped even further, to 43.6%, when adverse side effects were reported during the first weeks of vaccination in Hong Kong.

It took more than a year for vaccine confidence to recover. Low vaccine confidence was associated with vaccine refusal, the authors said.

Four factors, including mistrust in health authorities, low vaccine confidence, vaccine misconceptions, and political views, accounted for 82.2% (95% CI, 62.3% to 100.0%) of vaccine refusal in adults aged 18 to 59 years and 69.3% (95% CI, 47.2% to 91.4%) of vaccine refusal in adults aged 60 years and older.

Mandates, in the form of both workplace mandates and Hong Kong vaccine passes once the Omicron surge began to cause significant mortality, were related to great increases in uptake.

Workplace vaccine mandates were associated with a 62.2% (95% CI, 9.9% to 139.2%) increase in daily COVID-19 vaccination appointments, and the Hong Kong vaccine pass was associated with 124.8% (95% CI, 65.9% to 204.6%) increases in daily COVID-19 vaccination appointments.

Continue reading here:

Vaccine refusal linked to mistrust in health authorities - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

Elon Musk factchecked after ‘misleading’ post on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Know more | Mint – Mint

October 21, 2023

Micro-blogging site 'X' CEO Elon Musk has shared a video stitching screenshots of headlines that appeared to show declining estimates of protection from COVID-19 vaccines.

The clips stitched together are a combination of missing context, headlines presented out of order, using incomparable data, and while the jabs do not completely protect against infection, physicians and epidemiologists say they are effective in reducing the risk of severe illness and death, reported news agency AFP.

Musk wrote X, "Have you heard dis information?". He wrote this in a play on words captioning a video he shared on September 26, 2023.

As per details, the clip was a montage of 111 screenshots of headlines, scientific article titles, and websites that purport to show diminishing levels of protection over time from vaccines against COVID-19.

Apart from this, this also highlights percentages in the text on the screen in red, giving the impression as the video progresses that confidence in the effectiveness of the vaccine has degraded throughout the rollout of the shots, said the report.

Details say, the video was not created by Musk and was already circulated on social media in November 2022. However, interest in the clip following the post of the tech billionaire who bought Twitter in 2022 generated more than 635,800 likes and 197,300 reposts as of October 18.

The video spread in posts in languages including French and German and to other social media platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook.

Recently, the video was also posted to YouTube and the Canadian video-sharing site Rumble, where it was viewed more than 11,700 times.

The claim spread by Musk is a recent example of a long trend of misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines.

Meanwhile, AFP found the succession of images in the video does not follow the chronology of when each article was published. Also, the article uses incomparable data by looking at results for different vaccines and reactions to different variants of the disease.

On 3 October, University of Texas professor of immunology Jeffrey Cirillo referred to this as false. He said, as quoted by AFP, "The argument that the effectiveness or efficiency of vaccines has declined based on the available data is false."

According to AFP, the 111 screenshots in the montage reference articles published mostly between September 2020 and October 2021, that had nothing to do with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Also, the article headlines begin with one touting 100 percent efficacy of the vaccine and then progressively passes to 85 percent, then 50 percent, before shifting to headlines with no statistics, but discussing 'vaccine disasters', added the report.

In the video, posted by Musk, the juxtaposed articles' headlines discuss COVID-19 inoculations' effectiveness at different points during the pandemic, which witnessed the development of variants of the virus that were more resistant to previous formulas of the vaccine.

University of Texas' Cirillo said, as quoted by AFP, "A vaccine against one virus (variant) provides different levels of protection against a different virus (variant)."

With agency inputs.

"Exciting news! Mint is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest financial insights!" Click here!

The rest is here:

Elon Musk factchecked after 'misleading' post on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Know more | Mint - Mint

Judge Partially Sides With AstraZeneca Over Firing Employees Who … – Law.com

October 21, 2023

A federal judge in Maryland denied several former AstraZeneca employees ADA and religious discrimination claims after they were fired for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine, concluding they werent discriminated against for religious reasons or disabilities.

The court did, however, allow some of the plaintiffs religious discrimination claims against the company to stand.

Originally posted here:

Judge Partially Sides With AstraZeneca Over Firing Employees Who ... - Law.com

The Weekly Roundup: Jim Jordan’s Bid for U.S. Speaker, Private … – The Texan

October 21, 2023

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Visit link:

The Weekly Roundup: Jim Jordan's Bid for U.S. Speaker, Private ... - The Texan

Duke researchers develop COVID vaccine that protects against 3 strains – CBS17.com

October 21, 2023

DURHAM, N.C. (WNCN) A coronavirus vaccine designed to protect against three different deadly strains, developed by researchers at the Duke Human Vaccine Institute, has shown success in recent mouse studies.

We are making important progress toward a broadly protective coronavirus vaccine, said senior authorKevin O. Saunders, Ph.D., associate director of theDuke Human Vaccine Institute. These are pathogens that cause or have the potential to cause significant human infections and loss of life, and a single vaccine that provides protection could slow down or even prevent another pandemic.

Saunders and colleagues built the tri-valent vaccine using a nanoparticle that contains a fragment called a receptor binding domain from different COVID-19 strains. The fragment provides enough information for immune cells to build an effective response against the actual COVID-19 virus when it enters the body.

In early studies with mice and primates, researchers say that the nanoparticle vaccine was effective against multiple variants. Human tests are planned next year for a version that carries immunogens to different strains, including those that have dominated since the original outbreak in 2019.

Researchers also the vaccinated mice did not grow sick when challenged with different strains of the virus.

This study demonstrates proof-of-concept that a single vaccine that protects against both MERS and SARS viruses is an achievable goal, Saunders said. Given that one MERS and two SARS viruses have infected humans in the last two decades, the development of universal coronavirus vaccines is a global health priority.

The study received funding support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is part of the National Institutes of Health (U54 CA260543, P01 AI158571).

See more here:

Duke researchers develop COVID vaccine that protects against 3 strains - CBS17.com

Novavax’s Prototype COVID-19 Vaccine Nuvaxovid Receives Full Approval in Singapore – Oct 18, 2023 – Novavax Investor Relations

October 19, 2023

GAITHERSBURG, Md., Oct. 18, 2023 /PRNewswire/ --Novavax, Inc. (Nasdaq: NVAX), a global company advancing protein-based vaccines with its Matrix-M adjuvant,today announced that Singapore's Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has granted full approval for Novavax's prototype COVID-19 vaccine Nuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373) for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 inindividuals aged 12 and older. The Singapore Ministry of Health has included Nuvaxovid in the National Vaccination Programme as a protein-based non-mRNA option for COVID-19 prevention.

"Today's full approval of our prototype vaccine will enable us to file for approval of our updated protein-basednon-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the coming weeks," said John C. Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, Novavax. "We continue to work closely with HSA to ensure a protein-based vaccine is part of the portfolio for Singaporeans to protect themselves against COVID-19."

For the 2023-2024 vaccination season,Novavax has developed an updated COVID-19 vaccine which has been authorized for use in the U.S.The updated vaccine induces neutralizing antibody responses against currently circulating variants XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.2.3,BA.2.86, EG.5.1, FL.1.5.1 and XBB.1.16.6.Additional non-clinical data demonstrated that Novavax's vaccine induced CD4+ polyfunctional cellular (T-cell) responses against EG.5.1 and XBB.1.16.6. These data indicate Novavax's vaccine can stimulate both arms of the immune system and may induce a broad response against currently circulating variants.1,2

In clinical trials, the most common adverse reactions associated withNovavax's prototype COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2373) included headache, nausea or vomiting, muscle pain, joint pain, injection site tenderness, injection site pain, fatigue and malaise.

Trade Name UseThe trade name Nuvaxovid has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

AboutNuvaxovid (NVX-CoV2373)NVX-CoV2373 is a protein-based vaccine made by creating copies of the surface spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19. With Novavax's unique recombinant nanoparticle technology, the non-infectious spike protein serves as the antigen that primes the immune system to recognize the virus, while Novavax's Matrix-M adjuvant enhances and broadens the immune response. The vaccine is packaged as a ready-to-use liquid formulation and is stored at 2 to 8C, enabling the use of existing vaccine supply and cold chain channels.

About the PREVENT-19 Phase 3 TrialThe PRE-fusion protein subunitVaccineEfficacyNovavaxTrial COVID-19 (PREVENT-19) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded Phase 3 trial conducted in the U.S. and Mexico to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NVX-CoV2373 as a primary series and as a booster in adults and adolescents to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a primary series, the primary endpoint was the first occurrence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed symptomatic (mild, moderate, or severe) COVID-19 with onset at least seven days after the second dose in 29,960 adult participants aged 18 and older at baseline without protocol violations prior to illness. A secondary endpoint was the prevention of PCR-confirmed, symptomatic moderate or severe COVID-19. Full results of the trial were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

About Matrix-M AdjuvantWhen added to vaccines, Novavax's patented saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant enhances the immune system response, making it broader and more durable. The Matrix-M adjuvant stimulates the entry of antigen-presenting cells at the injection site and enhances antigen presentation in local lymph nodes.

AboutNovavaxNovavax, Inc. (Nasdaq: NVAX) promotes improved health by discovering, developing and commercializing innovative vaccines to help protect against serious infectious diseases. Novavax, a global company based in Gaithersburg, Md., U.S., offers a differentiated vaccine platform that combines a recombinant protein approach, innovative nanoparticle technology and Novavax's patented Matrix-M adjuvant to enhance the immune response. Focused on the world's most urgent health challenges, Novavax is currently evaluating vaccines for COVID-19, influenza and COVID-19 and influenza combined. Please visit novavax.com and LinkedIn for more information.

Forward-Looking StatementsStatements herein relating to the future of Novavax, its operating plans and prospects, the scope, timing and outcome of future regulatory filings and actions, including its coordination with HSA, are forward-looking statements. Novavax cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, challenges satisfying, alone or together with partners, various safety, efficacy, and product characterization requirements, including those related to process qualification and assay validation, necessary to satisfy applicable regulatory authorities; resource constraints, including human capital and manufacturing capacity, on the ability of Novavax to pursue planned regulatory pathways; challenges or delays in obtaining regulatory authorization for its product candidates, including its updated XBB version of its COVID-19 vaccine in time for the fall 2023 vaccination season or for future COVID-19 variant strain changes; challenges or delays in clinical trials; manufacturing, distribution or export delays or challenges; Novavax's exclusive dependence on Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. for co-formulation; and those other risk factors identified in the "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" sections of Novavax's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We caution investors not to place considerable reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this press release. You are encouraged to read our filings with the SEC, availableat http://www.sec.govand http://www.novavax.com, for a discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements in this press release speak only as of the date of this document, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of the statements. Our business is subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, including those referenced above. Investors, potential investors, and others should give careful consideration to these risks and uncertainties.

Contacts:InvestorsErika Schultz 240-268-2022 [emailprotected]

MediaAli Chartan 240-720-7804 [emailprotected]

References

SOURCE NOVAVAX, INC

See original here:

Novavax's Prototype COVID-19 Vaccine Nuvaxovid Receives Full Approval in Singapore - Oct 18, 2023 - Novavax Investor Relations

Page 83«..1020..82838485..90100..»