Category: Covid-19 Vaccine

Page 41«..1020..40414243..5060..»

Getting Reluctant Patients to ‘Yes’ on COVID Vaccination – Medscape

March 21, 2024

No matter how much we'd like to leave it in the dust, COVID-19 remains prevalent and potent. Tens of thousands of people still contract COVID per week in the United States. Hundreds die. And those who don't may still develop long COVID.

Pleas from public health officials for people to get a COVID vaccine or booster shot have been ignored by many people. About 80% of eligible Americans haven't taken any kind of COVID booster. Meantime, the virus continues to mutate, eroding the efficacy of the vaccine's past versions.

How to get more people to get the jab? Vaccine hesitancy, said infectious disease specialist William Schaffner, MD, is likely rooted in a lack of trust in authority, whether it's public health officials or politicians.

Schaffner, a professor of infectious diseases at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, and former medical director of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, recommended five strategies physicians can try when discussing the importance of staying up to date on COVID vaccines with patients.

First and foremost, if doctors are feeling reluctance from their patients, they need to know "what they shouldn't do," Schaffner said.

When a patient initially doesn't want the vaccine, doctors shouldn't express surprise. "Do not scold or berate or belittle. Do not give the impression the patient is somehow wrong or has failed a test of some sort," Schaffner said.

Step back and affirm that they understand what the patient is saying so they feel reassured, even if they don't agree or it's based on falsehoods about the vaccine.

He said patients need to feel "the doctor heard them, it's okayto tell the doctor this." When you affirm what the patient says, it puts them at ease and provides a smoother road to eventually getting them to say "yes."

But if there's still a roadblock, don't bulldoze them. "You don't want to punish the patientlet them know you'll continue to hear them," Schaffner said.

Fear of side effects is great among some patients, even if the risks are low, Schaffner said. Patients may be hesitant because they're afraid they'll become one of the "two or three in a million" who suffer extremely rare side effects from the vaccine, Schaffner said.

In that case, doctors should acknowledge their concern is valid, he said. Never be dismissive. Ask the patients how they feel about the vaccine, listen to their responses, and let them know "I hear you. This is a new mRNA vaccineyou have concern about that," Schaffner said.

Doctors can segue into how there's little reason to wait for some elusive perfectly risk-free vaccine when they can help themselves right now.

"The adverse events that occur with vaccines occur within 2 months [and are typically mild]. I don't know of a single vaccine that has genuinely long-term implications," Schaffner said. "We should remember that old French philosopher Voltaire. He admonished us: Waiting for perfection is the great enemy of the current good."

Here's something that may seem obvious: Don't treat the vaccine as an afterthought. "Survey after survey tells us thisit has everything to do with the strength of the recommendation," Schaffner said.

Doctors typically make strong treatment recommendations such conditions as diabetes or high blood pressure, but "when it comes to vaccines, they're often rather nonchalant," he said.

If a patient is eligible for a vaccine, doctors should tell the patient they need to get it not that you think they should get it. "Doctors have to make a firm recommendation: 'You're eligible for a vaccineand you need to get ityou'll receive it on your way out.' It then becomes a distinct and strong recommendation," he said.

In the opening of Charles Dickens's novel "Hard Times," the stern school superintendent, Mr Gradgrind, scolds his students by beating their brow with the notion that, "Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else and root out everything else."

The idea that facts alone can sway a vaccine-resistant patient is wrong. "It often doesn't happen that way," Schaffner said. "I don't think facts do that. Psychologists tell us, yes, information is important, but it's rarely sufficient to change behavior."

Data and studies are foundational to medicine, but the key is to change how a patient feels about the data they're presented with, not how they think about it. "Don't attack their brain so much but their heart," Schaffner said.

Schaffner has stressed with his patients that the COVID vaccine has become "the social norm," suggesting virtually everyone he knows has received it and had no problem.

Once questions have been answered about whether the vaccine works and its various side effects, doctors could remind the patient, "You know, everyone in my office is getting the vaccine, and we're trying to provide this protection to every patient," he said.

You're then delving deeper into their emotions and crossing a barrier that facts alone can't breach.

Lead by example and personalize the fight against the virus. This allows doctors to act as if they're building an alliance with their patients by framing the vaccine not as something that only affects them but can also confer benefits to a broader social circle.

Even after using these methods, patients may remain resistant, apprehensive, or even indifferent. In cases like these, Schaffner said it's a good idea to let it go for the time being.

Let the patient know they "have access to you and can keep speaking with you about it" in the future, he said. "It takes more time, and you have to be cognizant of the nature of the conversation."

Everybody is unique, but with trust, patience, and awareness of the patient's feelings, doctors have a better shot at finding common ground with their patients and convincing them the vaccine is in their best interest, he said.

Here is the original post:

Getting Reluctant Patients to 'Yes' on COVID Vaccination - Medscape

COVID-19 vaccine clinic offered by Wood County Health Department and Committee on Aging BG Independent News – BG Independent News

March 21, 2024

Posted By: Jan Larson McLaughlin March 20, 2024

Wood County Health Department and Wood County Committee on Aging are hosting a COVID-19 vaccine clinic at the Wood County Senior Center, located at 140 S. Grove St. in Bowling Green, on March 25 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Appointments are limited and must be scheduled in advance. Call the Wood County Committee on Aging at 419-353-5661 for an appointment, available on a first-come, first-served basis. Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are available.

Adults aged 65 and older are now eligible to receive an additional dose of the updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine, which first became available in September 2023. The CDC recently recommended an additional dose for people 65 and older in recognition of the increased risk of severe disease from COVID-19 in older adults, along with the currently available data on vaccine effectiveness.

Participants with insurance are asked to bring their insurance card and insurance will be billed. No payment will be collected at the time of vaccination. People who do not have insurance or whose insurance does not cover the vaccine will not be charged.

The mission of Wood County Health Department is to prevent disease, promote healthy lifestyles and protect the health of everyone in Wood County. The Community Health Center provides comprehensive medical services for men, women and children. All patients are welcome, including uninsured or underinsured clients, regardless of their ability to pay, and most third-party insurance is accepted. For more information, visit woodcountyhealth.org.

View original post here:

COVID-19 vaccine clinic offered by Wood County Health Department and Committee on Aging BG Independent News - BG Independent News

High-risk groups can now book spring COVID-19 vaccination – CBC.ca

March 21, 2024

Nova Scotia

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share by Email

Posted: March 18, 2024

People considered to have the highest risk for severe illness from COVID-19 can now make an appointment online for a spring dose of the vaccine.

The dose will be available from March 25 to May 31.

Those who are eligible to book for the vaccinationinclude:

Nova Scotia Health recommends people wait six months after their last COVID-19 shot or infection to get a vaccine dose, but a shorter interval of at least three months is allowed for the spring dose, the department said in a news release.

Nova Scotia Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Robert Strang said COVID-19 cases are steady in the province.

Those who didn't opt to get a fall or winter dose can still get oneeven if they aren't eligible for the spring campaign.

People who aren't eligible for the spring dose but who did get a COVID-19 booster shot during the fall or winter are "considered to be up to date," Nova Scotia Health said in its release.

In addition to booking the shot online, people can also make an appointment for the vaccinationby calling1-833-797-7772.

MORE TOP STORIES

See the original post here:

High-risk groups can now book spring COVID-19 vaccination - CBC.ca

Former Harvard Medical School prof says he was fired for opposing COVID-19 vaccine mandates – Campus Reform

March 21, 2024

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and infectious disease epidemiologist, was fired from his position at Harvard Medical School for opposing vaccine mandates, according to a recent article that he wrote.

I am no longer a professor of medicine at Harvard, Dr. Kulldorff wrote in a City Journal article published on March 11. The Harvard motto is Veritas, Latin for truth. But, as I discovered, truth can get you fired.

[RELATED: Harvard FINALLY drops COVID-19 vaccine requirement for incoming students]

In comments made to Campus Reform, Kulldorff indicated that the universitys decision infringed upon academic freedom. Academic excellence is founded on freedom of speech with open, passionate, and civilized discourse, without bullying or cancellation, he stated.

In his article, Kulldorff said that it was clear from the beginning of the pandemic that COVID-19 would spread across the globe, and that it was futile to try to suppress it with lockdowns. He also stated that it was evident that lockdowns would inflict enormous collateral damage on both education and public health.

We will be dealing with the harm done for decades. Our children, the elderly, the middle class, the working class, and the poor around the worldall will suffer, he wrote.

Dr. Kulldorff also argued that Sweden, his native country, successfully defeated COVID-19 without using lockdowns. Yet, he noted that in a 2020 Harvard-edited article on whether primary schools should reopen, the researchers ignored the example of the Swedish approach in their analyses.

It was like ignoring the placebo control group when evaluating a new pharmaceutical drug, Kulldorff noted. Thats not the path to truth.

Based in part on evidence from Sweden, Dr. Kulldorff opposed lockdown measures during the pandemic.

To advocate his position, Kulldorff and two other epidemiologists published the Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020, which argued in favor of age-based focused protection instead of universal lockdowns. This solution would, in his view, protect the elderly while letting children and adults live close to normal lives.

Kulldorff explained that he was immediately described as fringe and accused of being enticed . . . with Koch money and cultivated by right-wing think tanks by Harvard colleagues.

Though Kulldorffs position against lockdowns drew the ire of many pro-lockdown advocates, his position against vaccine mandates ultimately led to the termination of his position, he argued.

For scientific, ethical, public health, and medical reasons, I objected both publicly and privately to the Covid vaccine mandates, Dr. Kulldorff wrote. This stance got me fired by Mass General Brighamand consequently fired from my Harvard faculty position.

Ultimately, Kulldorff expressed hope for Harvard to return to academic freedom, which he believes is the only solution to the problem it now faces.

If Harvard and its hospitals want to be credible scientific institutions, they should rehire those of us they fired, Dr. Kulldorff concluded. My hope is that someday, Harvard will find its way back to academic freedom and independence.

[RELATED: Rep. Foxx says Harvard has absolutely failed to comply with subpoena, handed over useless documents]

A professor of medicine at Harvard since 2003, Kulldorff is a founding fellow at Hillsdale Colleges Academy for Science and Freedom.

Campus Reform has contacted Harvard University for comment. This article will be updated accordingly.

Originally posted here:

Former Harvard Medical School prof says he was fired for opposing COVID-19 vaccine mandates - Campus Reform

Vaccines to Watch in 2024 – Drug Topics

March 21, 2024

Public attitudes toward vaccination have become increasingly complex in recent years. Factors such as vaccine fatigue and misinformationwhich began circulating during the COVID-19 pandemic and has persistedhave eroded trust in vaccination, making some individuals hesitant to roll up their sleeves. Some who had previously relied on vaccine regimens began to question their value, increasing skepticism and causing a dip in vaccine uptake.

Amid these challenges, 2024 offers hope: Pharmaceutical research and development teams are pioneering new vaccines that leverage messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, expand protection to vulnerable populations, and streamline the vaccination processefforts that may help mend ongoing divides. Here is a look at some of the most anticipated vaccine developments in 2024.

READ MORE: Immunization Resource Center

Read more from the original source:

Vaccines to Watch in 2024 - Drug Topics

New state law bans health departments from promoting COVID vaccines – KRLD

March 21, 2024

Some Texas doctors are outraged about a new state law that bans health departments from promoting COVID vaccines.

The law went into effect last September, it's a provision in the budget that prohibits any agency funded by the state health department from promoting COVID vaccines. That means no outreach programs and local health departments have stopped hosting vaccine clinics.

Health departments can still administer vaccines if asked.

The provision, known as Rider 40, is legal but many doctors say it's not a good public health policy.

The CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccines, insisting evidence shows it's the best way to protect yourself from getting the virus.

The coronavirus has killed more than 100,000 Texans since 2020.

LISTENon the Audacy App Tell your Smart Speaker to "PLAY 1080 KRLD" Sign Upto receive our KRLD Insider Newsletter for more news Follow us onFacebook|Twitter|Instagram|YouTube

Read the original post:

New state law bans health departments from promoting COVID vaccines - KRLD

People 65+ urged to get second COVID-19 shot | News | newportnewstimes.com – Newport News Times

March 21, 2024

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Visit link:

People 65+ urged to get second COVID-19 shot | News | newportnewstimes.com - Newport News Times

COVID vaccines found to cut risk of heart failure, blood clots following virus infection: Study – ABC News

March 19, 2024

This page either does not exist or is currently unavailable.

From here you can either hit the "back" button on your browser to return to the previous page, or visit the ABCNews.com Home Page. You can also search for something on our site below.

STATUS CODE: 500

Visit link:

COVID vaccines found to cut risk of heart failure, blood clots following virus infection: Study - ABC News

COVID vaccines can cut post-infection heart failure, blood clot risk: Research – The Hill

March 19, 2024

The COVID-19 vaccine can cut the risk of heart failure and blood clots after a COVID-19 infection, a new study in the British Medical Journal found.

Previous studies found that a SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger cardiac and thromboembolic complications, and the risk for a person infected remains high for a year after becoming sick, researchers noted.

The new study found that while the risks remain, getting a vaccine slashes the risk of heart failure up to 55 percent and blood clots up to 78 percent after getting sick.

Using a sample of 10.17 million vaccinated people and 10.39 million unvaccinated people across three European countries, the study found the positive health effects were most significant in the 30 days following a vaccination but can last up to a year.

The study examined people who were vaccinated with Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.

After the COVID-19 vaccine became politicized and controversial despite medical professionals urging the public to receive the shot, doctors said this study shows complications from the infection itself are worse than complications that may come from receiving the vaccine.

“While there has been concern about the risk of myocarditis and other thromboembolic events following vaccination, this analysis highlights that the risk of such complications is notably higher when it comes from the SARS-CoV-2 infection itself,” Dr. John Brownstein, the chief innovation officer at Boston Children’s Hospital, told ABC News.

The results of the study show that a COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes after a COVID infection. The effects were more pronounced in the few weeks following the infection, but are “consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection,” the study found.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends adults 65 years and older get an updated vaccine. The CDC released a report that the most recent vaccines from the fall were found to be 54 percent effective at preventing symptomatic infections among adults.  

Read the original here:

COVID vaccines can cut post-infection heart failure, blood clot risk: Research - The Hill

Brazilian ex-president Jair Bolsonaro indicted for faking his Covid-19 vaccine data – The Independent

March 19, 2024

The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US

Former president of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro has been indicted for allegedly falsifying his Covid-19 vaccine records.

Federal police allege that Mr Bolsonaro falsified information in the countrys public health database in December 2022 to falsely make it appear that he, his daughter and several other close allies had received the Covid-19 vaccine, according to The Associated Press.

He also faces charges of criminal association.

The indictment comes after a long investigation by federal police into whether Mr Bolsonaro falsified his Covid-19 vaccine card to get around US requirements.

Mauro Cid, former aide to Mr Bolsonaro, was also indicted as part of the investigation, according to Reuters.

Last year, Mr Bolsonaro denied allegations that he falsified the data and said he had never claimed to be vaccinated.

A legal analyst told The AP that Mr Bolsonaro faces between two to twelve years behind bars if convicted of falsifying health data. Meanwhile, the criminal association charge carries a four-year sentence, the analyst said.

Jair Bolsonaro has been indicted on charges related to suspected falsification of his Covid-19 vaccine records

(AFP via Getty Images)

The former president has long rejected the Covid-19 vaccine, instead advocating for the use of hydroxychloroquine, a drug also touted by Donald Trump. However, hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malaria drug, has been proven to not be effective against Covid-19.

During the peak of the pandemic in 2020, Mr Bolsonaro also ignored emails from Pfizer offering to sell millions of vaccines to Brazil, The AP reported.

In 2021, he then faced accusations of corruption after finally purchasing vaccines from Indian pharmaceutical Bharat Biotech. A health ministry official at the time said he felt pressured to greenlight the agreement despite irregularities in invoices.

Both Mr Bolsonaro and the company denied any wrongdoing.

Aside from this case, the former president is also facing several separate legal challenges. Last year, a panel of judges barred Mr Bolsonaro from running for office until 2030 after ruling he abused his power during the 2022 election and cast unfounded doubts on the countrys electronic voting systems.

Federal police are also investigating Mr Bolsonaro for his suspected role in a series of attacks on government buildings on 8 January 2023 by his supporters after he lost the election to Luiz Incio Lula da Silva in a day that brought back memories of the January 6 riots on the US Capitol.

Mr Bolsonaro has denied any wrongdoing in connection to those attacks. Earlier this year, federal investigators launched Operation Tempus Veritatis Hour of Truth in Latin into the incident, by conducting dozens of searches and arresting several of Mr Bolsonaros allies.

Mr Bolsonaro has long aligned with Mr Trump and the American far-right. Last year, he spoke at several conservative events, including the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference. He also gave remarks outside of one of Mr Trumps hotels in Miami, Florida, at an event hosted by conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

See the rest here:

Brazilian ex-president Jair Bolsonaro indicted for faking his Covid-19 vaccine data - The Independent

Page 41«..1020..40414243..5060..»