Category: Corona Virus

Page 96«..1020..95969798..110120..»

Anthony Fauci to testify before Congress about pandemic mandates, COVID-19 origins – USA TODAY

December 9, 2023

usatoday.com wants to ensure the best experience for all of our readers, so we built our site to take advantage of the latest technology, making it faster and easier to use.

Unfortunately, your browser is not supported. Please download one of these browsers for the best experience on usatoday.com

Go here to read the rest:

Anthony Fauci to testify before Congress about pandemic mandates, COVID-19 origins - USA TODAY

Maine doctors talk COVID-19 isolation and testing around holiday gatherings – NewsCenterMaine.com WCSH-WLBZ

December 9, 2023

BANGOR, Maine Maine doctors renewed their call Thursday for people to get the most updated COVID-19 vaccine that targets the predominant variant before families gather for the holiday season.

Dr. James Jarvis, Northern Light Health's senior physician executive, said the majority of new variants are all in the Omicron family, in the XBB subset.

"They continue to track new variants on a daily basis. That's how fast this virus mutates," Jarvis said.

He said these latest variants do not appear to make someone more severely ill, but they are more infectious, spreading more easily.

The most updated booster vaccine came out in October and targets XBB variants.

"Individuals who received an original vaccine back in 2021, that targeted a completely different vaccine," Jarvis said. "That's the reason why we have a new vaccine and we are strongly recommending that everyone over six months of age get that vaccine because it will protect you from the particular family that continues to be the family that we see these variants coming from."

Doctor Jarvis says no vaccine gives someone 100 percent protection, which is why they encourage good hygiene and masking in crowds.

"It's just like a car accident. We can't prevent 100 percent of car accidents. What we try to do is minimize what happens when you're in a car accident," he said.

The U.S. CDC updated guidance around isolating and testing in August, including a calculator that helps you know how long to stay home.

The agency's guidance says regardless of vaccination status, you should isolate from others when you have COVID-19. You should also isolateif you are sick and suspect that you have COVID-19 but do not yet have testresults.If your results are negative, you can end your isolation.

If your symptoms improve, you can leave your home, but should still wear a mask around others for five more days. Day 0 of isolation is the day of symptom onset, regardless of when you tested positive. Day 1 is the first full day after the day your symptoms started.

You can read more of the CDC guidance here.

For the latest breaking news, weather, and traffic alerts, download the NEWS CENTER Maine mobile app.

View post:

Maine doctors talk COVID-19 isolation and testing around holiday gatherings - NewsCenterMaine.com WCSH-WLBZ

‘We’re clearly in a wave:’ Ontario’s COVID-19 wastewater signal is more than double what it was at this time last year – CP24

December 9, 2023

COVID-19 viral activity in Ontario as measured by the provinces wastewater signal is now more than double what it was at this time last year and health officials are raising concerns about what could be a challenging few weeks heading into the holidays.

The latest data, released on Thursday afternoon, shows that Ontarios wastewater signal now stands at 2.1, up from 2.04 at this time last week.

It was 0.98 on the same day in 2022.

The data, maintained by Public Health Ontario, suggests that this is the highest wastewater signal the province has recorded in more than a year. However, a similar dataset maintained by the now defunct Ontario Science Advisory Table shows that the number hasnt actually been this high for at least two years.

There's a real consistency about what's happened now that we're clearly in a wave that started towards the end of the summer, early fall, Dr. Fahad Razak, an internist at St. Michaels Hospital and the former scientific director of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Table, told CP24.com in an interview this week. There was a hope that it had started to plateau by late September, early October. But in fact, unfortunately, it's gone the other direction and continues to rise quite steeply.

While the provincewide wastewater signal currently stands at 2.1, the number varies across different regions.

In the GTA, the growth in viral activity has been less pronounced with the number now standing at 1.68 compared to 1.09 one year ago.

But in the central west region of Ontario, which includes communities immediately outside of the GTA, the number is at 3.65, more than five times what it was a year ago. In eastern Ontario it is 2.78, nearly three times last year's number.

The wastewater signal, of course, isnt a perfect reflection of the overall level of COVID in a given community.

But Razak says the number of positive PCR tests among those who still qualify for the test is also at a one-year high, as is the number of people in hospital testing positive for COVID-19.

For many people, the evidence of an increasingly active respiratory virus season is evident around them as well, he said.

I think that the anecdotal experience of probably everyone in this province is that right now, you know a lot of people who have been infected, whether it's at work, whether it's in school, whether it's in your family, I think this is a constant refrain, Razak says. And I can say we're certainly seeing this in the healthcare system as well. People who are working, theyre getting sick. So you know, I think we have everything pointing in the same direction.

Speaking earlier this week, Ontario's Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Kieran Moore said the virus is on the upswing, whereas this time last year it was declining.

I'm sorry to say we still have significant COVID activity across Ontario roughly 1,800 people in hospital, 100 needing intensive care, Moore told CP24.

Moore said that while 1.8 million people have gotten the latest vaccine, that represents just 13 per cent of the eligible population.

Importantly, the latest vaccine has seen just a 40 per cent uptake from those who are 65 and older.

And yet there's roughly 800 Ontarians over 80 and 700 Ontarians over 70 in hospital today with COVID. So that's a key population we need to maintain immunity against COVID, Moore said. Natural immunity against the virus fades with time and so does immunity from the vaccine and those populations really need to stay up to date with their immunizations.

The fact that more people are not requiring ICU care despite the sharp uptick in transmission around the province is evidence, Razak says, that the vaccines have been effective at preventing more serious illness in many people.

Even though there has been a rapid rise in the number of people in hospital with COVID, the number of people in the intensive care unit has barely risen. And so that is good news, Razak says. And we should recognize why that has occurred. That has occurred because of immunity. And it's the immunity that the vast majority of the population has from vaccines, and infections, and both vaccines and infections combined, which we call hybrid immunity. There's a really important lesson from that, which is that keeping your immune protections up works.

He adds that aside from COVID-19, influenza and RSV, there are many other respiratory viruses circulating at the moment.

There is also probably a lot of overlapping viral infections happening right now, where you get infected with one thing, you start to get better, you get infected with another virus. And so you have these kinds of waxing and waning symptoms.

He said the tools that we used over the past few years to combat infection are still useful for helping to reduce the spread of COVID and other respiratory viruses, which is especially important for older, more at-risk populations, as well as to protect the health-care sector. Those tools include masking in crowded settings, rapid tests and vaccinations.

While none of the tools are perfect, Razak acknowledges, used together they are much more effective than doing nothing.

As someone who works in the hospital sector as a frontline physician, this winter is going to be very challenging for us again, Razak says, pointing out that staffing is still a challenge and that the real crush of influenza and COVID-19 cases has not really started.

COVID-19 and flu vaccines are now widely available at pharmacies, doctors offices, and local vaccination centres.

Moore said this week that transmission is expected to peak around the holidays. With that in mind, doctors are saying that people can act now to reduce spread to loved ones as we head into the holidays.

I would say we've had three very tough holiday seasons now in a row. Let's do whatever we can to make this one better, Razak says.

That includes steps, such as masking in crowded places, testing and staying home if you're sick.

And then move on with your life and enjoy your holidays because people have had a very difficult time. Let's make this the best holiday possible.

Excerpt from:

'We're clearly in a wave:' Ontario's COVID-19 wastewater signal is more than double what it was at this time last year - CP24

Ex-PM Boris Johnson denies in inquiry he wanted to let COVID rip – Al Jazeera English

December 9, 2023

Johnson says at public inquiry that perceptions of the Partygate scandal were a million miles from reality.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson has told Britains COVID-19 inquiry that any suggestion he wanted to allow the virus to let rip was completely wrong and hit out at absolutely absurd portrayals of partying in Downing Street during the pandemicas he faced a second day of questioning at a public inquiry.

Johnson, 59, was forced from office last year after public anger erupted over revelations about a series of COVID-19 lockdown-breaching parties called Partygate.

But he insisted to the inquiry on Thursday that perceptions of the scandal were a million miles from the reality of what happened.

Advertisement

It follows the ex-leader apologising on Wednesday for the pain and the loss and the suffering caused by the pandemic on his much-anticipated first day in the witness box and accepting mistakes had unquestionably occurred.

The United Kingdom went on to have one of Europes longest and strictest lockdowns as well as one of the continents highest COVID-19 death tolls with the virus recorded as a cause of death for more than 232,000 people one of the worst official per capita tolls among Western nations.

Johnson has faced a barrage of criticism from former aides for alleged indecisiveness and lack of scientific understanding as well as for a Downing Street culture that facilitated Partygate.

Advertisement

I continue to regret very much what happened, Johnson said on Thursday when asked about the scandal before branding dramatic representations of it a travesty of the truth.

The version of events that has entered the popular consciousness about what is supposed to have happened in Downing Street is a million miles from the reality of what actually happened, he added.

His aides and officials thought they were working very, very hard which they were and I certainly thought that what we were doing was within the rules, Johnson said.

Police last year fined the former leader and his then-finance minister and current Prime Minister Rishi Sunak as well as dozens of staff for flouting the COVID restrictions they set by attending boozy gatherings in Downing Street.

A parliamentary inquiry concluded Johnson had repeatedly misled parliament over the parties, and he resigned as a lawmaker shortly before its findings were published this year.

Johnsons pushback came as the lawyer for the inquiry, created to learn lessons from the countrys response to the health emergency, grilled his contentious decision-making as the virus repeatedly re-emerged in 2020.

Advertisement

The ex-leader defended his choice to delay a national lockdown during a second wave of COVID-19 and his internal use of the phrase let it rip to refer to a possible so-called herd immunity strategy.

Johnson claimed plenty of people were using the phrase to describe the potential strategy of shielding the vulnerable and allowing the rest of the population to acquire immunity.

He also disputed suggestions that offering financial inducements for people to eat out after the first lockdown was lifted Sunaks signature policy had caused a rise in infections.

Advertisement

I cant see anything that conclusively shows that it made a big difference, he said. If it was safe to open hospitality, then it must be safe for people to go to hospitality.

In his first day of evidence, Johnson repeatedly insisted he and officials did their level best and that his priority was always to save lives and the state-run National Health Service (NHS).

On Thursday, he appeared close to tears as he pushed back on claims of indifference towards those with COVID-19, recalling his own hospitalisation with the virus.

When I went into intensive care, I saw around me a lot of people who were not actually elderly. In fact, they were middle-aged men, and they were quite like me and some of us were going to make it and some of us werent, he said.

What Im trying to tell you in a nutshell and the NHS, thank God, did an amazing job and helped me survive but I knew from that experience what appalling a disease this is. I had absolutely no personal doubt about that from March onwards. To say that I didnt care about the suffering that was being inflicted on the country is simply not right.

But relatives of the bereaved have been highly critical.

Four women were evicted from the inquiry room on Wednesday after holding up signs reading: The dead cant hear your apologies. Later, a crowd that had gathered outside the venue heckled loudly as he left for the day.

Sunak will face the inquiry on Monday.

Read this article:

Ex-PM Boris Johnson denies in inquiry he wanted to let COVID rip - Al Jazeera English

COVID-19 surges across the US despite official cover-up – WSWS

December 9, 2023

Over the past six weeks, transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has more than doubled across the United States, according to the latest wastewater data released Monday by Biobot Analytics. Amid complete silence from the Biden administration and the corporate media, the American population is being subjected to its eighth wave of mass infection with a deadly virus capable of damaging every organ system and causing myriad long-term debilitating symptoms.

Modeling the latest wastewater data, oncologist Dr. Mike Hoerger of Tulane University estimates that at present roughly 1.2 million Americans are catching COVID each day, while 8.6 million people are now actively infectious. By New Years Day, there will likely be 1.8 million daily new infections and 12.9 million infectious people. This would be the second-highest level of daily infections of the entire pandemic, surpassed only during the initial wave of the Omicron variant in the fall-winter of 2021-22.

Loading Tweet ...

The Biden administration is doing everything possible to keep the public from knowing the immense dangers it confronts, in order to facilitate a policy of deliberate mass infection that will cause older Americans and disabled people to fall by the wayside, as expressed by Dr. Anthony Fauci earlier this year. To the extent that the surging pandemic kills vulnerable people, this is, in the words of former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Rochelle Walensky, an encouraging sign.

The fourth winter wave of the pandemic in the US is now concentrated in the colder Midwest and Northeast regions, with the Midwest experiencing its worst level of infections since January 2022, during the first wave of the Omicron variant. Wastewater levels of SARS-CoV-2 are also rising in the South and West, and expected to surge in the weeks ahead.

COVID-19 hospitalizations are rising rapidly in the Midwest, particularly in Illinois, Michigan and Indiana, and deaths will soon climb as well, although both official figures are significant undercounts due to the scrapping of COVID testing.

Until now, the wave in the US has been fueled primarily by the Omicron EG.5 and HV.1 subvariants. The JN.1 subvariant, a descendant of the highly-mutated BA.2.86 subvariant (nicknamed Pirola), is rapidly becoming dominant and is expected to supplant all other variants globally in the weeks ahead. Only after this variant is dominant will it be possible to tell whether it is more pathogenic and likely to hospitalize or kill those infected.

The latest wastewater data entirely confirm the warnings made by the World Socialist Web Site two weeks ago that this years record Thanksgiving travel would facilitate the spread of COVID-19, endangering millions of people across the country.

This is the first holiday season in the aftermath of the Biden administration and the World Health Organization (WHO) ending their respective COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) declarations, legitimizing Bidens lie that the pandemic is over. With the corporate media dutifully following suit, masses of people throughout the world have been led to believe this disinformation and have dropped their guard, with most family and other gatherings involving no mitigation measures whatsoever.

An appeal from David North: Donate to the WSWS today

Watch the video message from WSWS International Editorial Board Chairman David North.

The ending of the PHEs put the final nail in the coffin of whatever semblance of public health remained in the US and globally. In every country, pandemic surveillance has been scrapped, including testing, contact tracing, and the regular reporting of official COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths, as part of a systematic effort by capitalist governments to cover up the ongoing impacts of the pandemic.

Most recently, on November 27, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly announced on its website that it will no longer provide data from COVID case reports submitted to it by the states, until now the most reliable and prompt method of reporting COVID-19 deaths.

The US and world population are now flying blind into what could be a catastrophic winter storm of COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations and deaths. Coinciding with a surge of other respiratory pathogens, in particular, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), this could quickly become a repeat of last years tripledemic, or even worse. There are already reports of childrens hospitals being inundated in cities across North America and Europe, as well as in China.

A byproduct of the deepening cover-up of the very existence of the pandemicfueled by heavily funded anti-vaccine disinformation campaignsis the fact that booster vaccination rates have plummeted. Only 16 percent of American adults, and only 27 percent of the most vulnerable millions of elderly Americans who live in nursing homes, have been vaccinated with the latest monovalent booster shot tailored to the Omicron XBB.1.5 subvariant. Throughout much of the world, these life-saving boosters are not even available.

In a rare admission of the ongoing dangers of COVID-19, German Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach, a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), spoke on the devastating effects of Long COVID at a press conference Monday. Noting historical spikes in Parkinsons disease and dementia after the 1918-20 influenza pandemic, Lauterbach said that COVID-19 infection affects how the immune system in the brain functions, as well as the brains blood vessels, potentially increasing the long-term risk of these major neurodegenerative diseases.

Lauterbach stated, We are seeing an increasing number of [Long COVID] cases as the waves of infection continue to affect us. He added, COVID is not a coldwith a cold you dont usually see any long-term effects. You dont see any changes in the blood vessels. You dont usually see an autoimmune disease developing. You dont usually see neurological inflammationthese things that we all see with Long COVID It can affect brain tissue and the vascular system.

Expressing concern that only 3.6 percent of the German population has received the latest booster shot, Lauterbach concluded, Please protect yourself from Long COVID. Currently, the danger posed by COVID is indeed being underestimated.

Listening to this press conference, one could be forgiven for holding out hope that at least one official is taking the pandemic seriously. But the truth is that Lauterbachs comments were mere lip service to the immense suffering from Long COVID, meant to provide political cover for his own and the entire German governments criminal response to the pandemic.

Mehring Books

COVID, Capitalism, and Class War: A Social and Political Chronology of the Pandemic

A compilation of the World Socialist Web Site's coverage of this global crisis, available in epub and print formats.

Over the past two years, ignoring thousands of studies already published on Long COVID, Lauterbach has overseen the complete dismantling of all anti-COVID public health measures, creating the very conditions over which he now feigns concern. In April, Lauterbach echoed Bidens lie, tweeting, We can say that the pandemic is also over for Germany.

He has also complied with the SPD-led governments gutting of the health budget, which has been cut by three-quarters over the past two years, from 64.4 billion to 16.2 billion. This includes the slashing of funding for research into Long COVID from 100 million to only 21 million, a drop in the bucket relative to the vast scale of this health crisis.

Furthermore, Lauterbach, like all other capitalist politicians, refuses to encourage masking or offer any other means to stop or even slow the spread of the pandemic. A global elimination strategybased on cleaning indoor air in all public spaces, mass testing of the population to identify and cut off all chains of transmission, and other public health measuresis beyond the pale for the capitalist profit system.

Such a strategy, however, is now more attainable than at any point in the pandemic. On the same day that Lauterbach spoke and Biobot updated its wastewater data, an article was published in Vox on the growing research showing the immense potential of far-UVC technology to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and all other airborne pathogens.

The article, titled, Ultraviolet light can kill almost all the viruses in a room. Why isnt it everywhere? covers much of the same ground as a two-part series published by the WSWS this year. Citing a report from the organizations Rethink Priorities and 1Day Sooner, it notes, All told, the report estimates that a comprehensive plan to improve air quality, including far-UV, upper-room UV, and ventilation/filtration, in every single commercial building in the US would require a one-off investment of $214 billion.

Instead of providing such funding, necessary for the health of society, the Biden administration is funneling unlimited sums to Israel to carry out a genocide of the Palestinian population and to Ukraine to perpetuate its proxy war against Russia. The annual military budget for American imperialism now stands at over $1 trillion, enough to provide clean food, water and air for billions of people globally.

Despite a years-long propaganda campaign to condition the public to accept perpetual mass infection with COVID-19, there remains significant opposition to the capitalist let it rip policies among scientists, advocates for the disabled and older people, and advanced sections of the working class. As they enter into struggle against war, genocide and exploitation, workers and young people must renew the fight to end the COVID-19 pandemic through a scientifically grounded policy of global elimination.

The experience of the past four years of the pandemicin which over 27 million lives have been sacrificed at the altar of private profit, and all governments have surrendered their populations to unending waves of disease, disability and deathproves unequivocally that capitalism has nothing progressive to offer humanity. It is a doomed social order which must be replaced with a world socialist society, based on the principles of economic planning and social equality.

Join the fight to end the COVID-19 pandemic

Someone from the Socialist Equality Party or the WSWS in your region will contact you promptly.

Read more:

COVID-19 surges across the US despite official cover-up - WSWS

Boris Johnson tells Covid inquiry he avoided engaging with devolved administrations during pandemic for political reasons as it happened – The…

December 9, 2023

11.59EST Closing summary

Thats the end of the days hearing. Heres a summary of the key events:

Boris Johnson said he avoided cooperating with devolved administrations for political reasons. The former prime minister was confronted with his own insistence that it would have been optically wrong for the UK prime minister to hold regular meetings with other devolved administration ministers. And he was asked about the claim of one of his key advisers that he refused to deal with the Scottish first minister during the pandemic because of a personal enmity despite the potentially disastrous effect that course of action could have on the effectiveness of anti-Covid measures in the UK.

The former prime minister was described as self-serving and unfit for power by bereaved families. As his messages showed today, even when he knew measures needed to be taken to protect lives, he delayed for fear of how it might impact his reputation with certain sections of the press, their spokesperson said.

No scientists attended meetings about the eat out to help out scheme before it launched, Johnson said. He said he had frankly assumed they were involved in talks about the scheme with the Treasury and he was surprised it was smuggled past them.

Johnson was shown repeated instances of Patrick Vallance attributing the phrase let it rip to him in contemporaneous diary entries. Johnson has denied he used the phrase. The inquiry was shown several diary entries from Vallance with recollections of Johnson using the phrase let it rip.

Updated at 12.07EST

After Johnsons second appearance at the inquiry, Becky Kummer, a spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, says:

Our questioning today showed that Johnsons claims about the pandemic fall apart under the slightest scrutiny.

He did not get the big calls right, he failed to take the pandemic seriously in early 2020 leaving us brutally unprepared, and failed to learn from his mistakes meaning that the second wave had an even higher death toll than the first. The NHS was in fact severely overwhelmed, which he would know if he had met with the many thousands of bereaved families whose loved ones either couldnt get in to hospital, or couldnt get the treatment they needed once there. The UK was not in the middle of the pack, it suffered the second highest death toll in western Europe.

As his messages showed today, even when he knew measures needed to be taken to protect lives, he delayed for fear of how it might impact his reputation with certain sections of the press.

If his vanity hadnt taken priority over public health, many thousands of people, including my dad, might still be with us today. There are many lessons from the pandemic that might save lives in the future, but one of them is undoubtedly that someone as self-serving as Boris Johnson is not fit for power.

Updated at 11.55EST

Closing the days evidence, Johnson addresses Lady Hallett. He reprises comments briefed out to journalists before he started giving evidence.

He tells the inquirys chair that while its outside the scope of her work, he hopes she will be able to provide some sort of prod to the world to get the answer to the real origins of Covid.

Hallett reminds him that it does indeed fall outside of her terms of reference. And that he was the person who set those terms.

Updated at 11.54EST

Brian Stanton, for the British Medical Association, asks Johnson about the framing of the removal of Covid measures in July 2021 as bringing freedom. He asks Johnson to what extent the government prematurely gave the impression the pandemic was over, only to reintroduce restrictions within weeks.

Johnson says the progress made as part of the vaccination programme meant it was not inappropriate language.

Updated at 11.44EST

Samuel Jacobs, acting for the Trades Union Congress (TUC), asks about the former prime ministers view, expressed in 2021, that we cant have the bollocks of consulting with employees and trade unions. They need to all come back to work. All the malingering, workshy people.

He asks Johnson if his dismissive attitude was unbecoming of a prime minister.

Johnson claims his government did not ignore the difficulties facing working people. He adds that lockdowns were harming people on lower incomes, and that getting them back to work was the answer.

Jacobs presses him on the question of whether, by explicitly dismissing the prospect of consulting with workers representatives, he was driving an unhelpful culture. Not necessarily, Johnson tells the inquiry. He goes on to talk about the vaccination programme, saying this made it possible to get people back to work.

Jacobs asks why any of that means there should be no consultation with workers representatives. Despite being quoted as referring to such consultation as bollocks, Johnson claims he had nothing against consultation.

Instead, he claims, he was concerned about a drag anchor being put on getting people back to work.

Johnson says his primary concern was that, if consulted, working people might seek to maintain the more flexible working patterns he did not believe would benefit the economy.

He says he was worried people would be slow to acknowledge the progress towards returning to work the vaccination programme had made, and that there would be an inertia, and a desire to stay with the working from home pattern.

Updated at 11.40EST

Davies asks Johnson what lessons were learned on protecting people from domestic abuse from the first lockdown, and taken into subsequent lockdowns. Johnson talks at length about legislation his government introduced, which Davies reminds him is irrelevant because it did not refer to lockdown measures.

Johnson finishes by saying the government invested in telephone hotlines.

Updated at 11.25EST

Liz Davies KC, on behalf of several organisations that work against violence against women and girls, asks Johnson why his government explicitly failed to mention domestic abuse as a reason someone could leave their home before 2021. Johnson acknowledges that, in hindsight, ministers should have done more and done it more clearly.

Updated at 11.20EST

Returning to his answer, Johnson says given the misery of lockdowns for older people as well as younger it was reasonable to think about other approaches, and whether the continued lockdowns were effective. But, in the end, we had no alternative.

Updated at 11.12EST

Danny Friedman KC, acting for disabled peoples organisations, asks Johnson about his comments that older people were going to die anyway, have had a good innings, and should accept their fate, rather than destroying the economy. He asks if his choice of words represents shameful ageism.

Johnson disagrees, saying he was doing his best to reflect a debate that was very live, claiming that some older people would make these points to me.

Friedman is upbraided by the chair for using emotive language in his question that Lady Hallett says she did not approve.

Updated at 11.10EST

Menon asks why England pursued a more draconian approach than Scotland and Wales in respect of exempting younger children from certain restrictions. Johnson says the UK government was trying to reduce transmission.

Menon notes that the inquiry has heard no evidence the Scottish and Welsh governments approaches were more dangerous than that pursued by the UK government in England.

Updated at 11.00EST

Rajiv Menon KC is now addressing Johnson on behalf of several childrens rights organisations. He challenges Johnson on his claim that schools would be the last to close and the first to reopen, when he says pubs and hairdressers were reopened earlier.

Johnson says the government looked at extending the school year once schools could reopen, but ministers felt it made more sense given the normal school calendar to close them for the summer and reopen at the usual time.

Updated at 10.56EST

Anthony Metzer KC is questioning Johnson on behalf of long Covid groups. He is asked if, like his former adviser Dominic Cummings and the former health secretary Matt Hancock, he received advice on long Covid.

It is put to him that, while hed seen no evidence to support his scepticism and, indeed, had been pushed to acknowledge it by his advisers and colleagues, Johnson remained unconvinced it was a serious problem for a substantial amount of time.

Johnson said he was not suggesting it was not a problem, but that he wanted to see evidence of its extent. Asked about his assertion that the effects of long Covid were bollocks, he is asked why he did not simply ask for the NIHR report that had been published on it.

Johnson tries to claim that he did ask for some research and did eventually see evidence on long Covid but is finally pushed to acknowledge that he never asked to see the NIHR report.

Updated at 10.54EST

Johnson claims there was no medical reason for the disproportionate effects of the pandemic on people of colour, saying it must have been due to what he believes was their greater exposure to risk as a result of being more likely to be on the frontline.

Thomas pulls him up and asks if he was not aware of the role of institutional racism within the NHS, to which the former health secretary Matt Hancock referred, and that was set out in a Public Health England report. He asks the prime minister to clarify that it is his position that, as prime minister, he was unaware of that report.

Johnson tells the inquiry the evidence he saw did not support that conclusion.

Updated at 10.39EST

Leslie Thomas KC is now putting questions to Johnson on behalf of the Federation of Ethnic Minority Healthcare Organisations (FEMHO). He asks the former prime minister if he agrees its important to acknowledge the sacrifice of healthcare workers especially those from minority ethnic backgrounds as well as whether he owes them a personal debt after his own hospitalisations. Johnson agrees on both counts.

Thomas goes on to ask Johnson about Patrick Vallances view that the healthcare disparities seen during the pandemic were entirely foreseeable, and that the pandemic exacerbated existing inequalities. Why, then, did his government not act to mitigate the potential harsher effects of the pandemic on vulnerable and minority groups, Thomas asks?

Johnson tells the inquiry he was advised from the start that lockdowns were likely to be particularly harsh on people from disadvantaged backgrounds. He appears to suggest this was one of the reasons he was reluctant to go into lockdown.

He is asked to define the specific measures his government put in place to protect such people. Johnson says the government did not know the extent to which the virus itself would impact different groups differently in the run-up to the first national lockdown.

Thomas clarifies that he was asking about specific protective measures, before trying to move on. Johnson, talking over him, says it was difficult to put in place measures until the reasons for the disparities had been established.

Updated at 10.39EST

The inquiry is now rising for about 10 minutes.

Updated at 10.06EST

Visit link:

Boris Johnson tells Covid inquiry he avoided engaging with devolved administrations during pandemic for political reasons as it happened - The...

Does COVID-19 Make You More Susceptible to Other Illnesses? – TIME

December 9, 2023

Respiratory disease season is in full swing, with influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 case counts rising in various parts of the U.S. Hospitals in some states are also reporting upticks in pediatric pneumonia diagnoses, which experts say seems to be unrelated to the recent spike of pneumonias reported in China.

On the heels of last years severe flu and RSV reason, all this contagion has some people wondering if SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, may be to blame. Some studies suggest the virus leaves its mark on the immune system even after an acute illness passes, raising an important question: does having COVID-19 increase your risk of getting sick from other viruses in the future?

Any time that we get an infection, it changes us, says Dr. David Smith, chief of infectious diseases and global public health at UC San Diego Health. It changes our B cells, which make antibodies, and it changes our T cells, which do cellular functions to clear out infections.

Sometimes, these changes can be long-lasting. After a case of chickenpox, for example, the body typically builds lifelong immunity that prevents future bouts of the illness. But other viruses have more insidious effects. Measles essentially forces the body to re-learn how to fend off other infections, research shows, while HIV leaves people severely immunocompromised.

SARS-CoV-2 seems to fall somewhere between those two poles, though Smith emphasizes that research is ongoing. Reinfections are not only possible but common, ruling out the idea of widespread lifelong immunitybut there also isnt currently evidence to suggest COVID-19 is causing population-wide immune deficiency, says Sheena Cruickshank, a professor of immunology at the University of Manchester in the U.K.

Some studies do, however, suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infectionsparticularly severe onescan trigger changes to the immune system, including reductions in the number and performance of T cells; disruptions to B cells; deficiencies in dendritic cells, which regulate the immune response; and altered gene expression linked to increased inflammation. Some of these changes seem to last months after a serious case of COVID-19.

Scary as those findings sound, however, you may see a gazillion changes, but you dont know which of those changes may be relevant to future function, says John Tsang, a professor of immunobiology at the Yale School of Medicine. In other words: changes to specific immune cells dont necessarily mean that the whole system, or even part of it, will stop working.

Its normal for immune markers to ebb and flow after an infection, Cruickshank adds, and even changes that sound bad wont necessarily have long-lasting implications. Studies that have looked more long-term have shown that, for most people, the immune response bounces back to normal and restores, Cruickshank says. In one study co-authored by Tsang, men who recovered from mild COVID-19 actually mounted stronger immune responses to flu vaccines than men who had never had COVID-19, which could be beneficial. (Tsang and his co-authors didnt observe the same trend in women.)

There are exceptions, though. People who have severe cases of COVID-19 may experience lasting health problems, either from the virus itself or from certain drugs used to treat serious COVID-19, such as steroids and immune-system modulators, Smith says. Many scientists also think that chronic Long COVID symptoms could be a sign of immune dysfunction, and recent research suggests people with Long COVID are more likely to get reinfected by SARS-CoV-2 than people who fully recover.

For people who had mild cases and no long-lasting symptoms, though, Tsang says the scientific literature does not support the idea of widespread immunosuppression after COVID-19. So why does it seem that people are getting sick more often now than before the pandemic?

Theres always the chance that COVID-19 is causing immune changes that havent shown up in the research yet, says Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist who devoted a recent edition of her newsletter to COVID-19s impact on the immune system. But she feels its likelier that people are simply more attuned to any respiratory symptoms they experience than they were a few years ago.

Its also possible, Tsang adds, that the same revved-up immune response that COVID-19 survivors in his study mounted in response to the flu vaccine leads some people to experience more severe symptoms of common illnesses. We may feel a bit sicker because of the inflammatory response, Tsang says, but its not because our system now no longer responds to an infection.

Several years of decreased exposure to pathogens due to masking and social distancing may also have changed disease-transmission patterns, Cruickshank says. Children who were born during the pandemic may not have been exposed to germs they typically would have encountered as babies, leaving them to catch those bugs for the first time as toddlers or young kids. And even adults who'd had multiple prior brushes with common cold or flu viruses may now be faced with new strains of those viruses, to which their bodies are less familiar, Cruickshank says.

None of this is to say that COVID-19 is harmless. It is still a leading cause of death in the U.S.; Long COVID remains a serious risk; and theres evidence that even seemingly mild infections can affect the heart, brain, and other organs. Avoiding the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still the safest move for your healthregardless of how it affects your risk of getting sick in the future.

Read the rest here:

Does COVID-19 Make You More Susceptible to Other Illnesses? - TIME

Ex-UK leader Boris Johnson rejects notion he wanted to let COVID-19 ‘rip’ through the population – ABC News

December 9, 2023

LONDON -- Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in sometimes angry testimony to Britains inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic, on Thursday defended himself against suggestions that his indifference and failure to heed the advice of scientists led to thousands of unnecessary deaths.

In a second day of sworn testimony, Johnson rejected claims that he was prepared to let older people die to protect the economy and that he was too slow to order a second national lockdown as infection rates began to rise in the autumn of 2020.

Johnson, who left parliament after he was found to have misled lawmakers about lockdown-breaking parties during his premiership, said he learned about the horrors of COVID-19 firsthand when he was hospitalized with the disease in March 2020. In the intensive care unit, Johnson said he was surrounded not by elderly people but by middle-aged men like himself.

I knew from that experience what an appalling disease this is. I had absolutely no personal doubt about that from March onwards, he said. To say that I didnt care about the suffering that was being inflicted on the country is simply not right.

Johnsons testimony was an opportunity for the former prime minister to tell his side of the story 17 months after he was forced to resign following a series of scandals, including revelations about boozy parties in his Downing Street offices at a time when the country was under lockdown.

The families of COVID-19 victims have criticized his government for being slow to create an effective testing system, discharging hospital patients with the virus to care homes and dithering about restrictions on personal interactions all of which contributed to a higher death toll in Britain than most European countries.

The inquiry, which began public hearings earlier this year and is expected to run through 2027, is designed to uncover the lessons of COVID-19 to help officials better respond to future pandemics.

During his first day of testimony on Wednesday, Johnson apologized for mistakes made during the early days of the pandemic but maintained that he got the big decisions right, most importantly investing in the development of vaccines that ultimately provided a way out of the pandemic.

On Thursday, an unusually polite and deferential Johnson downplayed the sometimes crude and bombastic language contained in WhatsApp messages, diaries and government documents provided to the inquiry by other witnesses.

In one exchange, Johnson shook his head and said No, no, no as he was confronted with a series of diary entries by his chief scientific adviser that indicated he had argued in favor of letting the virus spread rapidly to increase immunity to COVID-19 rather than imposing further restrictions on the people of Britain.

Johnson said he was simply pushing scientists to explain why such a strategy wouldnt work as the government debated whether to impose a second national lockdown in the autumn of 2020 when infection rates were rising and vaccines werent yet available. The former prime minister said critics should look at his public statements and actions, rather than peoples jottings from meetings that I have been in when they assess the governments response to the pandemic.

I think, frankly, it does not do justice to what we did our thoughts, our feelings, my thoughts, my feelings to say that we were remotely reconciled to fatalities across the country, or that I believed that it was acceptable to let it rip, a frustrated Johnson said under questioning from the inquirys chief legal counsel, Hugo Keith.

Johnson defended his efforts to balance public health measures against the need to protect the economy, in particular the governments Eat Out to Help Out program, which supported the hospitality industry by subsidizing restaurant meals after the first lockdown ended in the summer of 2020.

Leading scientists have testified that they werent included in discussions about the program and that it was obvious it would increase the spread of COVID-19. Johnson said he had no reason to question the restaurant initiative.

I must emphasize, it was not at the time presented to me as something that would add to the budget of risk, he said.

But as infection rates began to rise, the government was once again faced with the question of whether to impose another lockdown that would save lives but drastically curtail personal freedoms.

Johnsons government implemented a series of less draconian measures including a 10 p.m. curfew, work from home advice and regionally targeted restrictions in September and October of 2020 before it finally imposed a second national lockdown on Oct. 31.

His remarks came after weeks of testimony by other ministers, including former Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who said they sought to raise the alarm inside the government about the threat posed by COVID-19. Hancock argued that thousands of lives could have been saved by starting the first national lockdown a few weeks earlier than the eventual date of March 23, 2020.

The United Kingdom went on to have one of Europes longest and strictest lockdowns, as well as one of the continents highest COVID-19 death tolls, with the virus recorded as a cause of death for more than 232,000 people.

Among Western European nations, only Italy recorded a higher excess death rate than Britain during the pandemic, according to data presented to the inquiry.

Families of the bereaved expressed hostility afterward, unmoved by his apologies. After Johnson testified, protesters outside shouted murderer and shame on you as left the building and into his awaiting car.

More here:

Ex-UK leader Boris Johnson rejects notion he wanted to let COVID-19 'rip' through the population - ABC News

Boris Johnsons second day at the Covid inquiry: key points – The Guardian

December 9, 2023

Boris Johnsons second day at the Covid inquiry video highlights Covid inquiry

The former PM addressed Partygate, letting it rip and eat out to help out in his second day of evidence

Boris Johnson has continued to defend his handling of the pandemic on his second day of giving evidence to the Covid inquiry. He expressed surprise that scientists were not consulted about the eat out to help out scheme, sought to justify having said older people should accept their fate, and claimed that characterisations of the Partygate scandal were a travesty of the truth.

We should have thought about how No 10 parties would look, Johnson told colleagues

Johnson worried about the public perception of parties in Downing Street after the first stories broke about the scandal, messages shown to the inquiry revealed. In December 2021 the cabinet secretary, Simon Case, recused himself from a Partygate inquiry after it emerged that one of the parties was hosted in his office. In a message to Case, Johnson said: I am really sorry this thing is now causing you any kind of grief at all. The whole business is insane. We will get through it and come out on top.

In another message, he said: In retrospect, we all should have told people above all Lee Cain [director of communications] to think about their behaviour in No 10 and how it would look. But now we must smash on.

Hugo Keith KC, counsel to the inquiry, suggested that the note showed Johnson did not care about the rules. Johnson replied: To say that I didnt care about what was happening generally is the complete opposite of the truth.

Johnson also said the public characterisation of parties in No 10 was a million miles away from reality.

At this point, the inquiry chair, Heather Hallett, intervened to say Partygate had worsened the grief of bereaved families. She said: Ive received a number of messages from bereaved people. So many of them suffered horrific grief during lockdown and Im afraid Partygate has exacerbated their grief.

Johnson said his near-death Covid experience gave him an insight into the suffering it caused

When he was accused of not caring, Johnson also cited his hospitalisation with Covid in April 2020. His voice breaking, he said: I havent talked about this before, in public. What you claim is my indifference to the pandemic. I just want to remind you when I went into intensive care. I saw around me a lot of people who were not actually elderly. They were middle-aged men and they were quite like me. And some of us were going to make it and some of us werent.

The NHS, thank God, did an amazing job and helped me survive. I knew from that experience what an appalling disease this is To say that I didnt care about the suffering that was being inflicted on the country is simply not right.

Sweden urged the UK to take a cautious approach, despite a reputation for letting it ripAnders Tegnell, Swedens chief epidemiologist and a figure who became a hero to those advocating against lockdowns, actually argued for a more precautionary approach during a meeting in 2020, Johnson claimed.

The Zoom meeting was one that Johnson had called to discuss the governments response to rising Covid-19 infections, and included government scientists as well as Tegnell and British scientists who were critical of lockdown measures.

What I remember is a surprising degree of unanimity, Johnson said, adding that it was interesting that scientists who had become associated with a let it rip approach to Covid did not really support it.

Johnson suggested giving older people a choice about isolation

The inquiry was shown messages from August 2020 in which Johnson suggested giving people over the age of 65 the choice of whether to isolate in their homes or run the diminishing risk of not shielding. He wrote: If you are over 65, your risk of dying from Covid is probably as big as your risk of falling down stairs. And we dont stop older people from using stairs.

Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, warned against the idea, pointing out that it would lead to an increase in the spread of the virus.

Johnson defended making the suggestion. He told the inquiry: You can see that we didnt do it. I was interrogating my advisers about points that have been made to me, which is my job.

Johnson defended going against the advice of scientists by not introducing a circuit breaker lockdown

In September 2020, Johnsons chief adviser, Dominic Cummings, and the governments chief scientific adviser, Patrick Vallance, urged the prime minister to introduce a so-called circuit breaker lockdown to tackle the rise of infections.

Johnson defended his decision to ignore the advice. He told the inquiry: Circuit breaker is a glib phrase. It actually means an immensely difficult, costly exercise which falls hardest on the poorest and neediest in society. You then might have to do it again and again. And even then, theres no guarantee that its going to work.

He pointed out that the then health secretary, Matt Hancock, was also against introducing a circuit breaker. The government chose instead to implement a regional system of tiered restrictions. Johnson said: I thought that a regional approach was a sensible way to go into it; it was worth trying.

Keith asked: Why didnt you apply what you knew to be the lesson learned from March, which is to go early, take a precautionary approach? Johnson said: We ratcheted up to the measures throughout September and October, we intensified the pressure on the virus. The thing that really threw us off was the Kent variant, the Alpha variant.

Johnson denied believing that older people needed to accept their fate

The inquiry previously heard that Vallance expressed alarm about Johnson being obsessed with older people accepting their fate and letting the young get on with life and the economy going.

Johnson denied that this was his view. He said: It does not do justice to my thoughts. We werent remotely reconciled to fatalities across the country I had to speak for everybody who wasnt in the meeting and who wanted these points put to the scientists.

Johnson was surprised that scientists had not been consulted on eat out to help out

Johnson said he assumed that the eat out to help out hospitality scheme had been cleared by government scientists. He said he was surprised by Whitty describing it as eat out and get the virus.

He claimed he was unaware that Vallance and Whitty were against the scheme. Johnson said: Im fairly confident that it was discussed several times in meetings in which I believe they must have been present. I dont quite understand how that could have happened.

He added: I remember being surprised, later I think it was in September when Chris says, This is eat out to help the virus. And I thought, Well, thats funny, because I didnt remember any previous controversy about it.

Johnson joked about singing and obesity in Wales contributing to high Covid rates, according to Vallance

The former prime minister blamed high rates of Covid in Wales on singing and obesity, according to a note in Vallances diary.

In September 2020 the chief scientific adviser noted increases in Covid infections across the UK, according to a page shown to the inquiry. He wrote: Wales very high PM says, It is the singing and the obesity I never said that.

Johnson was not asked about the comments.

Johnson dismissed the idea of consulting with trade unions about ending working from home as bollocks

On 2 July 2021, Vallance noted in his diary that Johnson wanted everyone to return to work. He quoted Johnson as saying: We cant have the bollocks of consulting with employees and trade unions. They need to all come back to work all the malingering, workshy people.

Asked if it was wrong to show such a dismissive attitude to consulting with unions, Johnson said: Not necessarily My worry was that there was going to be an inertia and a desire to to stay with working from home, which was not, in my view, necessarily going to be beneficial for a strong economic recovery that would benefit trades union members and their families.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

One-timeMonthlyAnnual

Other

See more here:

Boris Johnsons second day at the Covid inquiry: key points - The Guardian

Thursday briefing: What Boris Johnson did and did not reveal at his Covid inquiry grilling – The Guardian

December 9, 2023

First Edition

Good morning.

For about six hours yesterday, Boris Johnson finally had a chance to defend his record against the blistering criticism levelled against him over the course of the Covid inquiry since it started in June 2022. Evidence handed over to the inquiry has revealed that senior figures in his administration had significant doubts about Johnsons ability to lead and govern, creating an image of chaos, disorganisation and dysfunction during an unprecedented global health crisis.

As was expected after numerous press leaks, Johnson opened with an apology, stating that he was sorry for the pain and the loss and the suffering caused by the pandemic and acknowledging that his government may have made mistakes that added to the hurt. He also took personal responsibility for all decisions made by the government.

The stakes of this inquiry to some were immediately evident when four members of bereaved families held up pieces of paper that read the dead cant hear your apologies, as the former prime minister spoke. Protests continued outside and during one of the breaks another person yelled out youre a murderer at Johnson.

To get a rundown of the most important takeaways of yesterdays session, I spoke with the Guardians politics editor, Pippa Crerar. Thats right after the headlines.

Robert Jenrick | Rishi Sunaks government was plunged into crisis after his immigration minister quit just hours after the prime minister tabled a bill to save his Rwanda deportation policy. Robert Jenrick said the bill was a triumph of hope over experience and would mean that the policy will be challenged again in the courts.

Israel-Hamas war | UN secretary general, Antnio Guterres, has said that he expects public order to completely break down in Gaza amid Israels continuing bombardment, rendering even limited humanitarian assistance impossible.

Hillsborough disaster | Ministers have rejected the Hillsborough law reforms that are central to a campaign by families of the 97 people killed in the 1989 disaster to prevent future police cover-ups. Instead the government has signed a charter that states a commitment by departments to openness and transparency after public tragedies.

Cop28 | The head of the International Monetary Fund has said that carbon pricing, a way to put an implicit price on carbon emissions, would generate the vast amounts of cash needed to tackle the climate crisis. It is a traditionally unpopular policy as in practice it can hit poorer people hardest if it is badly applied.

Energy | A toxic culture of bullying, sexual harassment and drug-taking risks compromising the safety of Europes most hazardous nuclear site, multiple employees at Sellafield have claimed.

***

What was not said

The most surprising part of Boris Johnsons first session was not anything he said, but his tone, which was uncharacteristically deliberate and restrained. He is obviously aware that this is a really important moment in terms of shaping his own legacy, particularly because some claim he still harbours long-term hopes of making a political comeback, Pippa says. Whether it will make a difference to the public, who lived through the impact of the governments decisions, is unlikely. What he can do, though, is not make it worse for himself, Pippa adds.

In stark contrast to his appearance at the Privileges Committee in March, in which he got very angry and that actually led to a tougher sanction, he has been quite measured, Pippa says. He has said as little as possible and even when he was defending his actions he was trying not to be inflammatory.

***

What have we learned about the governments response?

One of the biggest contentions around the governments Covid response has been the chronology: who knew what when and why did they not act sooner.

Johnson conceded that in the early months of 2020, his government had underestimated the seriousness of the disease. He said he told then health secretary Matt Hancock to keep an eye on the situation, but there was no urgency until the end of February, despite reports that 11 municipalities in Italy had locked down. The scenes rattled Johnson, he said, adding that the government should have twigged how serious the situation was at that point.

Johnson said that, despite the fact that he was told Covid had a 2% fatality rate, the government was operating under a fallacious, inductive logic that meant they did not take those warnings as seriously as they should have. All the way up to mid-March, Johnsons advisers were not pushing for a full lockdown despite rapid increases in Covid cases around the world.

The former prime minister was also asked about his disparaging remarks regarding long Covid, which he called bollocks. Once confronted with this statement, Johnson apologised and added his remarks were never meant for publication.

He also said that he did not oscillate on key decisions in the run-up to the first lockdown, despite what his former adviser Dominic Cummings has previously said, insisting that he was just considering all the different arguments on both sides to work out the best course of action. That feels a bit like a convenient excuse, because its his job to test the politics, Pippa says. Itd be negligent not to consider those factors, but what weve heard from pretty much everyone whos given evidence so far is that even if he did want to hear all sides of an argument, he himself swung between the results.

***

Misogyny and a toxic work culture

A key theme throughout the inquiry has been the toxic work culture in No 10 at the time. Johnson insisted that the abusive messages sent between staff were not an example of this but a normal exchange between impassioned colleagues. Rebutting Hugo Keith KCs suggestion that the mud-slinging and friction in government was causing a problem, Johnsons said that if Tony Blair or Margaret Thatchers staff had had WhatsApp, their exchanges would have been pretty fruity.

Though Johnson has tried to distance himself from the claim that there was a toxic work atmosphere he also tried to defend the working culture. Pippa says that there is a contradiction in what he has said: On the one hand, he says hes not responsible for this toxic atmosphere. On the other hand, it sounds as though he was actively encouraging a quite aggressive approach almost to government policy.

Johnson also said that there were too many men in meetings, an admission that came after Helen MacNamara, the former deputy cabinet secretary, gave damning evidence to the Covid inquiry about misogyny.

***

The fallacy of herd immunity

One of the biggest errors in the governments early Covid strategy was herd immunity, a form of indirect protection achieved when most people have been infected and the virus cannot spread any more.

The idea was first mentioned on 5 March 2020 and persisted until the 14th. Johnson said the strategy was misunderstood by the public: he said they hoped herd immunity would be a by-product of what the government was doing not that it was the policy itself. For a detailed breakdown on the other issues heard at the inquiry yesterday, read Matthew Weaver and Ben Quinns explainer.

***

What can we expect to hear today?

Johnson is expected to be giving another full day of evidence today. Keith will probably continue his questioning in chronological order, picking up where he left off yesterday.

Expect to hear about the decisions that led up to the second winter lockdown in 2020, Partygate, and Dominic Cummings trip to Barnard castle.

The biggest thing here, though, is that this is Boris Johnsons last-ditch attempt to rewrite history, but I think he will struggle to do so, Pippa concludes.

Time magazine announced their person of the year for 2023 Taylor Swift, who this year became the main character of the world. As Sam Lansky writes, the larger narrative of Swifts life is about redemption. Clare Longrigg, acting head of newsletters

As Rishi Sunak and other rightwing leaders begin to step back away from their climate commitments, the world grows warmer. Diyora Shadijanova has written a brilliant article on how this regression will impact all of us. Nimo

In the holiday season, when longed-for family reunions can become ill-tempered before the main course is on the table (see The Bears season two episode, Fishes), Elle Hunt examines why we regress to adolescence when were back under our parents roof. Clare

If you want some ideas on how to make your wardrobe more sustainable, five writers have spent the last month mending, sewing, and washing their clothes less. Nimo

I feel entirely in the moment: Miranda Bryant joins the old and very young at the sauna, and in this sacred space for community and solitude, discovers why Finns are the happiest people in the world. Clare

Cricket | Danni Wyatt shone on her record 150th Twenty20 international appearance as England began their first tour of India in four years with an impressive 38-run victory in Mumbai. Wyatt hit 75 and Nat Sciver-Brunt made 77, with the pair sharing a match-winning stand in an imposing total of 197 for six.

Tennis | Emma Raducanu has missed out on the initial batch of wild card entries for the Australian Open. The former US Open champion has a protected ranking of 103 due to her lengthy absence from the tour following multiple surgeries but that is not currently high enough to secure entry to next months grand slam tournament.

Athletics | UK Athletics is set to announce record losses of 3.7m for the financial year after failing to secure a title sponsor or television deal in the buildup to the Paris Olympics.

The Guardian leads with Tories in turmoil as immigration minister quits over Rwanda bill. The Financial Times reports Sunaks drive to unite Tories behind Rwanda bill implodes as Jenrick quits. The Telegraph says Immigration minister quits as PM warned of electoral oblivion.

The Times has Rwanda bill is doomed says Jenrick as he quits, while the i says Jenrick quits as Sunak takes on Tory right over migration. The Mail asks Will the Tories ever give up fighting each other and start fighting Labour?

Elsewhere, the Mirror reports on Boris Johnsons appearance before the Covid inquiry under the headline The dead cant hear your apologies. Finally, the Sun reports that Anne Robinson is secretly dating Andrew Parker Bowles with Queen of mean dates Queens ex.

The lives and lies of George Santos

George Santos seemed to have had an amazing life. He had worked on a Broadway show, appeared on the childrens series Hannah Montana, been a star volleyball player, was a noted academic and a successful businessman whose company was worth millions. Now he was in Congress pushing policies such as making the AR-15 rifle the national gun of America.

But as it turned out, many of the stories he told about himself were not just exaggerations, but outright lies. Adam Gabbatt explains to Michael Safi how his rise and fall pose worrying questions about the US political system in a post-truth era.

A bit of good news to remind you that the worlds not all bad

In a pioneering new scheme, Englands first fishing apprenticeship launched earlier this autumn in south Devon. The result of years of work from industry leaders, the apprenticeship is seen as a vital part of efforts to ensure there will still be a British fishing industry in decades to come.

To draw them in, new apprentices (including Alfie Steer, pictured above) are offered pay, a relationship with a specific employer and training for skills they could use throughout their lives. These young people wont be as experienced as other crew, said lead tutor Mark Day, but they will be in the top 10% of deckhands in terms of the skills we have taught them.

Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday

And finally, the Guardians puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day with plenty more on the Guardians Puzzles app for iOS and Android. Until tomorrow.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

One-timeMonthlyAnnual

Other

Here is the original post:

Thursday briefing: What Boris Johnson did and did not reveal at his Covid inquiry grilling - The Guardian

Page 96«..1020..95969798..110120..»