Category: Corona Virus

Page 644«..1020..643644645646..650660..»

CSU And Regis Join CU Boulder On The Coronavirus List None Of Them Wanted To Make – Colorado Public Radio

October 8, 2020

Colleges, schools and childcare centers remain hotspots for COVID-19 infections as the number of outbreaks increases statewide.

The Colorado Department of Health and Environment confirmed at least 16 new outbreaks in education facilities this week, adding them to the 46 others that have occurred since the last week in August when most schools began.

As of Wednesday, there were at least 2,211 confirmed cases among those attending college, school or daycare.

The majority of these new cases occurred at University of Colorado Boulder, which, according to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, had at least 1,527 confirmed cases and 168 suspected cases as of Wednesday. In response to a spike in cases, CU shut down on-campus classes Sept. 23.

Though the CU outbreak is still active, the number of new cases is now in a sharp decline according to the universitys COVID dashboard.

Two new public health orders went into effect in Boulder County on Wednesday.

CU is one of three colleges that the state health department has flagged as having widespread, communitywide disease transmission. CDPHE now tracks all cases associated with those schools together, rather than separating them out into individual outbreaks associated with a particular area of campus.

Visit link:

CSU And Regis Join CU Boulder On The Coronavirus List None Of Them Wanted To Make - Colorado Public Radio

Staffer in Gavin Newsom’s office tests positive for COVID-19 – Los Angeles Times

October 8, 2020

An intern in Gov. Gavin Newsoms administration and another state employee who interacted with members of the governors staff have both tested positive for the coronavirus, though neither came in contact with Newsom or his top advisors, the governor and his spokesman said Wednesday.

We are going through a contact-tracing process led by the Department of Public Health, and they have both been isolated and we are working back from that frame to make sure that everybody is appropriately tested, Newsom said during a briefing in Winters, Calif., on Wednesday.

The governors spokesman, Nathan Click, said that whenever a state employee tests positive for the coronavirus and was in a government office, state policy requires that shared spaces be deep-cleaned which was done where appropriate in these cases and that employees who had contact with that person, or with the office, quarantine themselves and seek testing.

Click declined to identify the employees who tested positive or their office locations, citing privacy laws. Newsom identified the governors office staff member as an intern and said the other employee worked for a separate state agency. Neither worked in the suite of Capitol offices occupied by Newsom and his senior staff, the governor said.

The governors office was alerted about the state employee Monday and about the governors office staff member earlier this week, Click said. Once notified, the governors office immediately began appropriate protocols such as contact tracing and asking employees to quarantine themselves if they had come in contact with the two people who tested positive.

We wish both individuals who tested positive well in their recovery, Click said.

Newsom said Wednesday that he has been tested for the virus on multiple occasions when the circumstances warranted, including when he visited a state prison and when he met with President Trump in Sacramento in mid-September during a briefing on the deadly wildfires in the state.

The last time he was tested was an hour before meeting with the president, and the results were negative, Newsom said. Neither state employee who tested positive attended the event with the president, Click said.

Ive never been tested positive. Ive been tested negative on multiple times, Newsom said Wednesday.

Newsoms comments came almost a week after disclosures that Trump and First Lady Melania Trump tested positive for the coronavirus, with the president requiring several days of hospitalization with COVID-19 symptoms. The White House is now grappling with an outbreak of the virus among senior advisors to Trump as well as support staff and others who came in contact with those infected.

During a news conference Monday, Newsom took a subtle jab at Trump and others for being dismissive about the use of masks to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

Well continue to maintain our vigilance. Well continue not to send mixed messages as it relates to importance and imperative of wearing masks or minimize the impact of this disease on peoples health, lives that are lost, Newsom said.

Click said that the governors office has reduced staff levels at the Capitol, where Newsom and his senior advisors work, because of the pandemic and has scrapped most in-person meetings in favor of videoconference calls.

Read the original here:

Staffer in Gavin Newsom's office tests positive for COVID-19 - Los Angeles Times

Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus – The New York Times

October 8, 2020

Trailing in the polls, the president in recent weeks has increasingly held crowded campaign events in defiance of public health guidelines and sometimes state and local governments. When he accepted the nomination on the final day of the Republican National Convention, he invited more than 1,000 supporters to the South Lawn of the White House and has held a number of rallies around the country since, often with hundreds and even thousands of people jammed into tight spaces, many if not most without masks.

There is no one closer to Mr. Trump than Ms. Hicks, who returned to the White House this year after leaving her position as communications director in 2018, and on Wednesday traveled with the president on Air Force One to Minnesota. She began feeling sick around the time of the campaign rally he held there, according to one person familiar with the events, and was quarantined on the return flight to Washington, where she disembarked from the back entrance of the plane.

Her positive diagnosis came on Thursday, according to the person familiar with her case, but the White House made no announcement about the situation, and Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, who had also been on the plane and exposed to Ms. Hicks, then held a briefing with reporters without mentioning it or wearing a mask.

Only after Bloomberg News reported Ms. Hickss condition did Mr. Trump confirm it during an appearance on Thursday night on Sean Hannitys show on Fox News, where he said he was waiting for his own test results.

The positive tests will undercut Mr. Trumps effort to change the subject of the campaign away from a pandemic that polls show most Americans believe he has mishandled and onto political terrain he considers more favorable. The president has sought to focus voter attention instead on violence in cities, his Supreme Court nomination, mail-in ballots and Mr. Bidens relationship with liberals.

Oct. 8, 2020, 12:51 a.m. ET

Mr. Trump is the latest world leader to become infected. Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain was so sick that he had to be hospitalized before later recovering. Prince Charles likewise contracted the virus, as have the leaders of Brazil, Honduras, Guatemala and Bolivia.

But the symbolism of an infected American president could rattle allies, as well as governors and business owners trying to assess when and how to reopen or keep open shops, schools, parks, beaches, restaurants, factories and other workplaces. Eager to restore a semblance of normal life before the election, Mr. Trump has dismissed health concerns to demand that schools reopen, college football resume play and businesses return to full operation.

The rest is here:

Trump Tests Positive for the Coronavirus - The New York Times

CDC Updates Guidance Acknowledging Coronavirus Spreads Via Airborne Transmission : Shots – Health News – NPR

October 6, 2020

Airborne transmission of the coronavirus can occur, especially in poorly ventilated and enclosed spaces, according to the CDC. VO Images/Getty Images hide caption

Airborne transmission of the coronavirus can occur, especially in poorly ventilated and enclosed spaces, according to the CDC.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now says the coronavirus can be spread through airborne particles that can linger in the air "for minutes or even hours" even among people who are more than 6 feet apart.

The CDC still says that SARS-COV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is most frequently spread among people in close contact with one another, through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes or talks. But in new guidance published Monday on its website, the agency also acknowledged that under certain circumstances, people have become infected by smaller particles that can linger in the air in enclosed spaces that are poorly ventilated.

"Sometimes the infected person was breathing heavily, for example while singing or exercising," the CDC said. In such cases, the CDC said, there's evidence that the amount of smaller infectious droplets and particles that a contagious person produces "became concentrated enough to spread the virus to other people" even if they were more than 6 feet away. In some cases, the CDC said, transmission occurred "shortly after the person with COVID-19 had left" the room.

Many experts who study the airborne transmission of viruses have been warning that the coronavirus can spread through the air for months. Last month, many experts cheered when the CDC seemed to address the issue, posting an update that suggested that aerosols tiny airborne particles expelled from a person's mouth when they speak, sing, sneeze or breathe might be among the most common ways the coronavirus is spreading. But the agency took down that guidance a few days later, saying it was a draft proposal that was posted to its website in error. The CDC's latest guidance stops short of calling airborne transmission "common."

"It's gratifying to see CDC acknowledge that there's a role for airborne transmission with this virus," said Donald Milton, an aerobiologist at the University of Maryland and coauthor of a letter published in the journal Science on Monday that calls for clearer public health guidance on how the coronavirus spreads through the air. However, the distinction between the CDC and Milton and his cosigners is how often airborne transmission happens.

In a call with reporters Monday, Milton and his cosigners on the Science letter said the evidence suggests that airborne transmission is probably the dominant form of transmission even in close-contact situations within 6 feet of an infected person.

"Airborne transmission happens by inhalation of virus that's in the air," said Linsey Marr, a professor of engineering at Virginia Tech and an expert in aerosol science. "And this is happening even more frequently when people are close to each other."

So how does this affect how we should protect ourselves in practical terms? Marr and other experts said people should be wearing a mask whenever they are indoors with people outside of their household pod even if they are standing more than 6 feet apart, or even in a situation where a plexiglass barrier is in place. Marr said masks are also a good idea outdoors if you are going to be in prolonged contact with people not in your household, even if you are more than 6 feet apart. "It's a grayish area where I think adopting the precautionary principle is best," Marr said.

It also means that "ventilation really is just so important," said Kimberly Prather, an atmospheric chemist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography and lead author of the Science letter. She recommends opening doors and windows, moving gatherings outdoors whenever possible, and the use of standalone air filters in rooms. (Prather, Marr and other scientists offer more tips in this FAQ on improving ventilation.)

In addition to improving ventilation indoors, the CDC said people should stay at least 6 feet away from others whenever possible, avoid crowded indoors spaces and as always wash their hands regularly.

Read the original:

CDC Updates Guidance Acknowledging Coronavirus Spreads Via Airborne Transmission : Shots - Health News - NPR

Tracking the White House Coronavirus Outbreak – The New York Times

October 6, 2020

Tested Positive

HopeHicks

NicholasLuna

RonnaMcDaniel

ThomTillis

BillStepien

John I.Jenkins

KayleighMcEnany

ChadGilmartin

KarolineLeavitt

GregLaurie

President Trumps announcement Friday that he and the first lady had tested positive for the coronavirus sent government officials scrambling to determine who else might have been exposed. By Monday afternoon, more than a dozen people who had been in contact with the president or attended White House or campaign events last week had said they had tested positive.

Several people who met with the president last week said they had since tested negative. But it can take days for someone who has been exposed to the virus to develop symptoms or to test positive. On Monday morning, Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, said she had tested positive.

The outbreak has extended beyond Mr. Trumps inner circle to threaten several people who may not have had direct contact with him. Two deputies in the White House Press Office have tested positive, and three journalists have also tested positive after covering White House events.

Here is a look at where Mr. Trump traveled and the people with whom he met in the days before his positive test.

In addition to regular meetings and news conferences at the White House, Mr. Trump attended several large gatherings in the past week, including the first presidential debate in Cleveland and rallies in Pennsylvania and Minnesota. He went ahead with a round table and reception in New Jersey on Thursday after a close aide, Hope Hicks, tested positive for the virus.

Positive

Negative

Not known

EveningCampaign rally in Newport News, Va.

HopeHicks

MarkMeadows

DanScavino

11:00 a.m.Latinos for Trump event in Doral, Fla.

KellyLoeffler

BrianKemp

DavidPerdue

BenCarson

RonnaMcDaniel

ToddRicketts

TommyHicks Jr.

The president and the first lady met with the judge and her family in the White House before attending a Rose Garden ceremony attended by 200 people. Few wore masks or kept socially distant.

ThomTillis

MarkMeadows

WilliamP. Barr

Alex M.Azar II

JoshHawley

KellyLoeffler

BenSasse

Pat A.Cipollone

John I.Jenkins

ThomTillis

GregLaurie

ChadGilmartin

KarolineLeavitt

KayleighMcEnany

WilliamP. Barr

MarkMeadows

BenSasse

JoshHawley

KellyLoeffler

Pat A.Cipollone

KayleighMcEnany

DanScavino

Thousands of supporters came to the rally near an airport hangar, and many were unmasked. Gov. Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania, a Democrat, said: It is gravely concerning that the president would insist on holding this event with blatant disregard for social distancing and masking requirements.

10:00 a.m.Visit to Trump National Golf Club in Potomac Falls, Va.

Chris Christie, who helped Mr. Trump prepare for the debate, told Good Morning America that five or six people were in the room with the president and that no one wore masks.

HopeHicks

KayleighMcEnany

Scores of attendees sat close together and unmasked at a White House reception in honor of military families and those who have died in service.

KayleighMcEnany

PeterNavarro

RobPortman

MikeTurner

Alex M.Azar II

BetsyDeVos

RobertFord

TateReeves

BrettGiroir

HopeHicks

BillStepien

DanScavino

JimJordan

MarkMeadows

Robert C.OBrien

KayleighMcEnany

ChrisWallace

MarkMeadows

JimJordan

StevenMnuchin

MarkMeadows

HopeHicks

NicholasLuna

KayleighMcEnany

DanScavino

MarkMeadows

5:30 p.m.Fund-raiser in Shorewood, Minn.

Thousands of supporters crowded the presidents rally in Duluth, Minn. Mayor Emily Larson said attendees should get tested.

Travel to and from Bedminster, N.J.

Mr. Trump attended a round-table and a fundraising event at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey. Gov. Phil D. Murphy, a Democrat, said Friday that the state had begun contact tracing, and urged all attendees to self-quarantine and get tested.

Reception in Bedminster, N.J.

Read the original post:

Tracking the White House Coronavirus Outbreak - The New York Times

Senate Republicans split on the need for coronavirus testing – CNN

October 6, 2020

"Sen. Grassley's doctors have not recommended he be tested as he has not come into close contact with anyone suspected of having or confirmed to have coronavirus," his aide Michael Zona said, suggesting that while Grassley was near and around those sick senators his contact with them was not close enough or long enough to warrant getting tested.

Grassley's decision is different than other top officials above and below him in the line of succession -- like Vice President Mike Pence, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and key members of the President's Cabinet -- who are being tested regularly, especially now that President Donald Trump has contracted the disease. But it puts Grassley in line with some GOP senators who told CNN they don't believe they need to be tested based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Capitol Physician guidelines, despite working alongside members who are positive for the disease.

An aide to Indiana Sen. Mike Braun, one of a handful of GOP senators who does not wear a mask at all times, said the senator is "following the advice of the Capitol Physician," who said "if you experience symptoms you should get tested, and he has not experienced symptoms."

Sen. Roy Blunt, a Republican from Missouri who chairs the Rules Committee and an advocate for more coronavirus testing on Capitol Hill, has not been tested because he "has not had any recent interactions that meet the CDC guidelines for testing," according to an aide.

Same with Sen. Mitt Romney a Republican from Utah, according to an aide. "There's no known exposure risk to him at this time, though we are monitoring," the aide said.

Senate Republicans spend a lot of time together. They met three times as a caucus last week, holding regular policy lunches in a large room in the Hart building with tables spread apart for social distancing. They remove their masks to eat and to speak, according to attendees. The senators who have tested positive -- Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina -- attended the lunches last week.

Grassley typically attends those lunches although his staff did not respond to multiple requests to confirm he attended them last week. But the senator did attend two Senate Judiciary Committee meetings last week, where most senators took off their masks when they spoke. During a hearing Wednesday with former FBI Director James Comey, Lee and Tillis were seen not wearing masks, although Grassley was not seated near them.

Also at the hearing was GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas whose spokesman declined to say if he's been tested. Drew Brandewie said the senator "followed all CDC guidelines last week during the Judiciary meetings and has not interacted with any of the members who tested positive."

A handful of other Republican senators have declined to say whether they've been tested for coronavirus.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his staff have refused to say if he has been tested for coronavirus in recent days, or explain why he doesn't want to disclose the information. He resisted questions on the issue at a news conference in Kentucky on Friday.

"Have I ever been tested? Yes. I'm not going to answer questions about when," McConnell said.

Some Democrats on the Senate Judiciary committee said they were tested for coronavirus after attending meetings with the Covid-positive senators, even though they did not come into close contact.

"Senator Leahy was tested for COVID-19 earlier today since he attended the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday, where it is now known that two senators were present who have tested positive for the virus. While he did not come into close contact with these two senators for an extended period of time, he took the test at the advice of the Capitol Physician," said David Carle, a spokesperson for Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who tested negative for the virus.

Similarly -- Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, who also sits on the Judiciary committee and attended the hearings -- was tested for coronavirus out of "an abundance of caution" and he was negative, according to his press secretary Karolina Wasiniewska.

Sen. Dick Durbin, Democrat from Illinois, also reported testing negative on Twitter.

Although some Republicans are not pushing to get tested, others have done it and tested negative, including: Sens. Rick Scott of Florida, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Rob Portman of Ohio, Todd Young of Indiana, David Perdue of Georgia, Tim Scott of South Carolina, Cory Gardner of Colorado and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, among others.

Three senators who fear they were in contact with Lee, Tillis or Johnson said they would self-isolate to ensure they did not contract the virus. They are Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma.

On Monday, McConnell was silent and did not respond to questions from CNN on whether he would allow coronavirus positive senators to vote on Barrett.

Read more:

Senate Republicans split on the need for coronavirus testing - CNN

Nine Days in Wuhan, the Ground Zero of the Coronavirus Pandemic – The New Yorker

October 6, 2020

McDonalds, Mulizwa said.

Not me, Sow said. I want to get some steak. Maybe some chicken. Something grilled.

I said something to the effect that the worst was behind them, and Sow grinned. Were still living, he said.

Wuhan memories remained fresh, and the materials of documentation were also close at hand. People sometimes handed over manuscripts, and they took out their phones and pulled up photographs and messages from January and February. But I wondered how much of this material would dissipate over time.

In town, I met two Chinese journalists in their twenties who were visiting from out of town. They had been posted during the period of the sealed city: back then, anybody sent to cover events in Wuhan had to stay for the long haul. One was a director of streaming media whom Ill call Han, and he had found that government-run outlets generally wanted footage that emphasized the victory over the disease, not the suffering of Wuhan residents. Han hoped that eventually hed find other ways to use the material. It will be in the hard drive, he said, tapping his camera.

The other journalist, a print reporter Ill call Yin, reminisced about the unusual freedom the press had been granted for a brief period in January. Journalists reported on whistle-blower figures like Li Wenliang, and they exposed some early missteps, like a failure by the Red Cross to distribute critical medical equipment. Such problems were quickly fixed, and Yin felt glad to be of service to society. I could see what it means to be the fourth estate, she said. But, in February, as the government started to get control of the pandemic, it also tightened restrictions on the press. A friend of mine said that it was a very short spring, Yin said.

After that, Yin reported on a number of issues that couldnt be published or completed, and she often talked with scientists and officials who didnt want to say too much. One person said, Ten years later, if the climate has changed, Ill tell you my story, Yin told me. He knew that he would be judged by history. She continued, These people are inside the system, but they also know that they are inside history.

Yin described an interview with an employee at a research institution who was so upset that he began to weep. He wouldnt answer her questions, but he said that he had been keeping a detailed diary. She hoped that someday such materials would be released.

I suspect that this will eventually happen, because nowadays there are so many ways to preserve information. In time, we will learn more, but the delay is important to the Communist Party. It handles history the same way that it handles the pandemica period of isolation is crucial. Throughout the Communist era, there have been many moments of quarantined history: the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, the massacre around Tiananmen Square. In every case, an initial silencing has been followed by sporadic outbreaks of leaked information. Wuhan will eventually follow the same pattern, but for the time being many memories will remain in the sealed city.

When I spoke with scientists outside China, they werent focussed on the governments early missteps. I tend to take a charitable view of countries that are at the beginning stage of epidemics, Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told me, in a phone conversation. According to her, its unrealistic to expect that any country could have stopped this particular virus at its source. Ive always believed that this thing was going to spread, she said.

Wafaa El-Sadr, the director of ICAP, a global-health center at Columbia University, pointed out that Chinese scientists had quickly sequenced the viruss genome, which was made available to researchers worldwide on January 11th. I honestly think that they had a horrific situation in Wuhan and they were able to contain it, she said. There were mistakes early on, but they did act, and they shared fast.

For much of El-Sadrs career, she has worked on issues related to AIDS in the United States, Africa, and elsewhere. After years of research, scientists eventually came to the consensus that H.I.V. most likely started through the bushmeat tradethe first human was probably infected after coming into contact with a primate or primate meat. El-Sadr views the coronavirus as another inevitable outcome of peoples encroachment on the natural world. We are now living through two concomitant massive pandemics that are the result of spillover from animal to human hosts, the H.I.V. and the COVID pandemics, she wrote to me, in an e-mail. Never in history has humanity experienced something along this scale and scope.

Theres a tendency to believe that we would know the source of the coronavirus if the Chinese had been more forthcoming, or if they hadnt cleaned out the Huanan market before stalls and animals could be studied properly. But Peter Daszak, a British disease ecologist who has collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for sixteen years on research on bat coronaviruses, told me that its typical to fail to gather good data from the site of an initial outbreak. Once people get sick, local authorities inevitably focus on the public-health emergency. You send in the human doctors, not the veterinarians, he said, in a phone conversation. And the doctors response is to clean out the market. They want to stop the infections.

Daszak believes the virus probably circulated for weeks before the Wuhan outbreak, and he doubts that the city was the source. There are bats in Wuhan, but it was the wrong time of year, he told me. It was winter, and bats are not out as much. His research has indicated that, across Southeast Asia, more than a million people each year are infected by bat coronaviruses. Some individuals trap, deal, or raise animals that might serve as intermediary hosts. But generally its people who live near bat caves, Daszak said. Every night, the bats fly out, and they urinate and defecate. Some might get on a surface, or on somebodys clothes, and then they touch their mouths or noses.

Daszak said that he had always thought that such an outbreak was most likely to occur in Kunming or Guangzhou, southern cities that are close to many bat caves and that also have an intensive wildlife trade. He thinks that Chinese scientists are probably now searching hospital freezers for lab samples of people who died of pneumonia shortly before the outbreak. You would take those samples and look for the virus, he said. Theyll find something eventually. These things just dont happen overnight; it requires a lot of work. Weve seen this repeatedly with every disease. It turns out that it was already trickling through the population.

Daszak is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit research organization based in New York. EcoHealth has become the target of conspiracy theorists, including some who claim that the virus was man-made. Daszak and many prominent virologists say that anything created in a lab would show clear signs of manipulation. Theres also speculation that the outbreak started when researchers accidentally released a coronavirus they were studying at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But theres no evidence of a leak, or even that the institute has ever studied a virus that could cause a COVID-19 outbreak.

Scientists in China are under incredible pressure to publish, Daszak said. It really drives openness and transparency. He has spent a good deal of time in Wuhan, and co-authored more than a dozen papers with Chinese colleagues. If we had found a virus that infected human cells and spread within a cell culture, we would have put the information out there, he said. In sixteen years, Ive never come across the slightest hint of subterfuge. Theyve never hidden data. Ive never had a situation where one lab person tells me one thing and the other says something else. If you were doing things that you didnt want people to know about, why would you invite foreigners into the lab?

In April, President Trump told reporters that the U.S. should stop funding research connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Shortly after Trumps comments, the National Institutes of Health cancelled a $3.7-million grant to EcoHealth, which had been studying how bat coronaviruses are transmitted to people. EcoHealth has appealed the decision, but Daszak doesnt expect a change unless theres a new Administration.

I asked Daszak why, if he has such faith in the openness of his Wuhan colleagues, the Chinese government has been so closed about other aspects of the outbreak. He said that science is one thing, and politics something else; he thinks that officials were embarrassed about the early mistakes, and in response they simply shut down all information. Youre a journalist in China, he said. I dont know what you would say about the Chinese idea of P.R., but Id say theyre pretty terrible.

One afternoon, I drove past Huoshenshan, the newly constructed emergency hospital. The site was cordoned off; people told me that the hospital had remained vacant in case the virus returns. But this seems unlikely, and Wuhan, like the rest of China, is looking to the next stage of the pandemic. At the beginning of July, China National Biotec Group, a subsidiary of a state-owned pharmaceutical company called Sinopharm, completed construction of a vaccine-manufacturing plant in Wuhan. The project began while the city was still sealed. Thats the politically correct thing to do, a Shanghai-based biotech entrepreneur told me. To show the world that the heroic people of Wuhan have come back.

The plant has the capacity to produce more than a hundred million vaccine doses a year. Another C.N.B.G. factory, in Beijing, can make an additional hundred million doses a year of a different version of the vaccine. Both plants are already producing and stockpiling the vaccines, which have almost completed Phase III trials. Because China essentially has no active pandemic, C.N.B.G. had to go far afield in order to find subjects. Currently, researchers have enrolled more than fifty thousand people in the United Arab Emirates, Peru, and other countries in South America and the Middle East.

Yiwu He, the chief innovation officer at the University of Hong Kong, told me that the C.N.B.G. vaccine has already been given to a number of Chinese government officials, under an emergency-use approval granted by the authorities. I know a few government officials personally, and they told me that they took the vaccine, he said, in a phone conversation. He thought that the total number was probably around a hundred. Its middle-level officials, he said. Vice-ministers, mayors, vice-mayors.

Pharmaceutical executives have also been expected to lead the way, like the construction manager who donned P.P.E. in order to escort his workers into the patient ward. Every senior executive at Sinopharm and C.N.B.G. has been vaccinated, He said. Including the C.E.O. of Sinopharm, the chairman of the board, every vice-presidenteveryone. The Chinese press has reported that vaccinations have also been administered to hundreds of thousands of citizens in high-risk areas around the world. (C.N.B.G. did not respond to a request for comment.)

In the West, Chinas image has been badly damaged by the pandemic and by other recent events. The country has tightened political crackdowns in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, and, in May, after Australia called for an investigation into the origins of the virus, China responded furiously, placing new tariffs and restrictions on Australian goods ranging from barley to beef. But He believes that the situation is fluid. All of these feelings can turn around quickly, he told me. I think that once China has a vaccine, and if they can help other countries, it can make a huge difference.

Visit link:

Nine Days in Wuhan, the Ground Zero of the Coronavirus Pandemic - The New Yorker

With the coronavirus, there are no magic bullets – STAT – STAT

October 6, 2020

What lessons should we learn from the fact that the president of the United States has caught Covid-19?

There is one simple one, which the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, keeps teaching but which seems extremely difficult to learn: There are no magic bullets against Covid-19.

No single strategy or technology is going to rescue society from the pandemic: not masks, not better testing, not a drug, not vaccines. For any of these, its easy to get caught up in optimism and hope. But the reality is that fighting the coronavirus requires doing many things correctly.

advertisement

That hasnt stopped people President Trump among them from grasping for single, easy solutions. In March, Trump tweeted that hydroxychloroquine, given with the antibiotic azithromycin, could be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine. They were not. He said the virus would miraculously disappear with warmer weather. Outbreaks have continued. And lately, hes been betting on a vaccine, saying it could even come before a very special date, meaning Election Day.

The entire pandemic has been about magic bullets, says Ashish K. Jha, dean of the Brown School of Public Health.

advertisement

But were not taking down this enemy with a single shot. Instead, everyone has to become an oddsmaker or a military commander trying to minimize the chance that the virus will breach their defenses.

The strategy of protecting the White House was a clear example. To keep the president safe, everyone who might come into contact with him was given a rapid test for SARS-CoV-2. But, as STAT reported in April, the test was thought by many outside experts to miss some infections. More than that, any test would miss some infections. No test is going to catch every case of SARS-CoV-2 every time. Every test has false negatives.

Yet the White House apparently viewed a positive test result as carte blanche to behave as if SARS-Cov-2 didnt exist. At the Rose Garden event announcing the presidents Supreme Court pick, attendees hugged, shook hands, and gathered inside as if a negative test result offered complete safety. There were few masks in sight.

In contrast, broad public health strategies against the virus that rely on testing such as proposals from the Rockefeller Foundation or the proposal championed by Harvard Professor Michael Mina in which the country is flooded with cheap, less accurate tests dont put such faith in a single test. The idea is that testing often, and catching cases when you can, will reduce the number of times healthy people are exposed to infected ones. Like everything else with Covid-19, its an odds game, and debates over any strategys utility are arguments about those odds.

The same is true of masks. Robert Redfield, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testified to Congress last month on their benefit: These face masks are the most important, powerful public health tool we have, he said. Nobody knows exactly how much protection a mask provides. Thats part of why some experts were skeptical of masking early in the pandemic. But evidence from studies of the physics of transmission and disease spread in countries with different policies on masking have now led to near-universal agreement that masking is a good idea. They reduce the odds of the virus spreading.

But you wouldnt bet on masks without testing- or testing without masks. Or either without social distancing. Its not that there is something special about keeping six feet apart from people some coughs may spread coronavirus farther. But if everybody stays six feet away, the odds of transmission go down.

And then there are vaccines. People are placing hope in the idea that a vaccine will allow us to go back to normal, said C. Michael Gibson, a Harvard cardiologist known for his ability to analyze trial data. I think thats false hope.

Its not that the vaccines in development wont work, or that a vaccine wont be a key tool in combating the virus. But we could end up still needing masks sometimes or at least we wont be back to shaking hands.

At least three vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson are likely to have results later this year or early next. And there are many more in testing behind them. Its not unlikely that at least one, and possibly several, will be effective enough to work.

But a vaccine could be approved if it reduces symptomatic cases of Covid-19 by just half. And whether it reduces transmission of the virus, or just keeps people from getting sick, is another open question. Whats more, all of the vaccines may be unpleasant to take they can cause fevers, fatigue, and other side effects and hard to distribute. The Pfizer shot, in particular, needs to be kept at temperatures much colder than an ordinary freezer.

A vaccine that didnt slow the spread of the virus but meant fewer people ended up in the hospital would still be useful. And there is every chance some of the vaccines may outperform this bar. But even several great vaccines probably dont turn off the pandemic like a switch. Jha said that he has advised the Biden campaign that if he wins, they will be dealing with the pandemic well into the next presidential term.

Dealing with that means not jumping the gun. Searching for a magic solution can leave you worse off than if you did nothing. Look at the case of hydroxychloroquine. Even those who think the drug has some benefit, perhaps in preventing the disease, should be able to see from the data from several randomized studies that the way it was used during March and April, in hospitalized patients, was wrong. It is simply clear it did not help.

Whats required now to return to a more normal life is the same thing that has been required all along: a series of incremental strategies (pushing testing, requiring masks, developing vaccines and treatments), and clear priorities (do you want to open schools or bars?) driven by an informed public debate about what matters to society.

As H.L. Mencken famously said, for every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. Whats required here isnt Rambo-style heroics. Its clear strategy, and the kind of courage and patience under fire that soldiers in the American Revolution needed when they were told, Dont fire until you see the whites of their eyes.

See the original post here:

With the coronavirus, there are no magic bullets - STAT - STAT

14 lingering questions about Donald Trump, coronavirus and the future of his presidency – CNN

October 6, 2020

And we know that at least eight people -- including Trump and first lady Melania Trump -- who attended last Saturday's announcement of Amy Coney Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court in the Rose Garden have since tested positive.

But beyond that, there are still a LOT of unknowns -- questions that the White House either refuses to answer or simply cannot provide good answers on. Below, a list of just some of those questions.

* What happens if Barrett isn't confirmed before Election Day?: The preference for the White House and Senate Republicans is to get Barrett on the Court before November 3. But as noted above, that is not a sure thing at the moment. If the votes aren't there before the election, my guess is that Trump and Senate GOPers will try to confirm her in a lame-duck session -- meaning one after the election but before the next Congress is sworn in. That's no big deal if Trump wins and Republicans keep control of the Senate. But if Trump loses and Republicans lose control of the Senate in the November election; it's not clear whether McConnell would be able to round up the 50 votes he needs to get Barrett confirmed and, even if he could, how that would play with a public who would watch Republican senators who had lost cast a hugely monumental vote to install a justice on the nation's highest court for life.

* If Trump is discharged, does that mean he is out of the woods?: I am not a doctor (sorry Mom!) but all indications are that if Trump is released by his medical team from Walter Reed that they believe is in out of immediate danger from the virus for now. Conley put it this way: "Though he may not be entirely out of the woods yet, the team and I agree that all our evaluations, and most importantly, his clinical status, support the President's safe return home, where he'll be surrounded by world class medical care."

"We're in a bit of uncharted territory when it comes to a patient that received the therapies he has so early in the course," Conley said on Monday. "So we're looking to this weekend -- if we can get through Monday with him remaining the same improvements -- better yet, then we will all take that final deep sigh of relief."

Read more:

14 lingering questions about Donald Trump, coronavirus and the future of his presidency - CNN

Alaska’s coronavirus cases are hitting new highs. A summer surge didn’t turn into a crisis. Will this one? – Anchorage Daily News

October 6, 2020

Alaskas coronavirus cases are at an all-time high, as evidenced by several red-flag indicators.

Now local and state officials, including Gov. Mike Dunleavy, say theyre watching closely to see what COVID-19 does next, especially when it comes to people getting sick enough to need hospitalization.

On Monday, Alaska reported 194 new resident cases, setting a new daily record. The last time the state saw that many cases in a day was in late July, a spike blamed partly on reporting delays. Monday marked the 12th day in a row new daily case tallies exceeded 100 the longest such streak since the start of the pandemic.

But that summertime peak of cases in July leveled out, Anchorage Health Department epidemiologist Janet Johnston said in an interview Monday.

Thats not whats happening now.

Last week, it felt like we were going the way we were in July, and the curves were pretty parallel, Johnston said. But now were continuing to go up. And it seems that a lot of the problem is that people have relaxed their vigilance about things like wearing masks and keeping distance at a time when were moving inside."

Fifteen of Mondays new cases were reported in North Pole, the town southeast of Fairbanks with more than 200 confirmed cases since March, where the citys mayor quarantined at home on the upper level of his house by afternoon.

Mayor Mike Welsh said his wife tested positive for the coronavirus on Friday. She isolated on the floor below.

Welsh said he just got off the phone with Dr. Anne Zink, the states chief medical officer, who is sending a team up here tomorrow to deal with rapidly rising cases in his region. His most pressing concern at the moment: ensuring North Poles main polling location was deep-cleaned ahead of Tuesdays local elections.

I think were all just stumbling through this, he said.

Cases are rising most quickly in Anchorage, Fairbanks and Northwest Alaska, but theres community spread throughout the state, officials say.

In Anchorage, continued high case counts have delayed the reopening of schools for in-person learning and led to prolonged capacity restrictions at bars and restaurants. Around the state, rising cases have triggered school closures and village lockdowns.

This week, Alaska hit an all-time high for the 14-day average COVID-19 case rate with more than 16 cases per 100,000 as of Monday, state officials warned. That translates to widespread community transmission with many undetected cases and frequent, discrete outbreaks.

The states test positivity rate as of Monday also passed 4% for the first time since the pandemic began in March. Public health officials have said that if that number goes above 5%, that can indicate high community transmission and not enough testing.

Were concerned that theres a lot of virus in the state right now, the states chief medical officer, Dr. Anne Zink, said in an interview last week. This is not the place I would like to be entering fall and winter to be totally truthful.

Positivity rate

Municipal officials in Anchorage last week described regular clusters of cases in assisted living centers where some of the states most vulnerable may be infected by staff who pick up the virus outside work. This week, Johnston stressed that it is changing community behavior and the changing season not these larger outbreaks that are driving the spread.

Whats mentioned most frequently (in contact tracer reports) is activities with families and friends, she said.

The days are getting shorter, its getting cooler, and theres more mixing inside, she added. And it feels to me that thats what the big driver is.

Fairbanks has the states highest case rates at 25.5 per 100,000 and the highest test positivity at 10%, local health-care providers say.

A Fairbanks school that phased in a group of 40 high-needs students for in-person learning in mid-September closed for all but online classes Monday after five people at Ladd Elementary tested positive for COVID-19 in the last two weeks, according to Yumi McCulloch, spokeswoman for Fairbanks North Star Borough School District.

State models, which briefly predicted declining case counts going into the fall, now forecast an increase to levels of infection higher than weve seen to date as the month goes on.

But there are other indicators that show Alaska compares favorably with many other places when it comes to how sick were getting with this virus, perhaps because there are more younger people here. So far, officials say, its people in their 20s and 30s who are driving up the new case tallies. Generally, they tend to weather the virus with fewer complications than older people or those with underlying medical conditions.

And so far, Alaskas death rate is still the lowest in the nation, according to Centers for Disease Control data. The number of people sick enough with COVID-19 to need hospitalization hasnt moved much for weeks and actually dropped slightly in recent days.

As of Monday, there were 37 COVID-19 patients hospitalized statewide, 11 of them in ICU beds in Anchorage where the states sickest patients tend to end up, according to data from the Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association.

Generally, hospitalization numbers for coronavirus patients have stayed consistent for the last 30 to 60 days, according to association president and CEO Jared Kosin.

Support from our readers helps make in-depth reporting like this possible. Join others in supporting independent journalism in Alaska for just $13.99 a month.

Health care administrators worried this summer, when similarly surging case counts led to fears of a crisis at the states hospitals as COVID-19 patients crowded limited ICU space.

That never happened, Kosin said. But it can one or two weeks for someone who contracts the virus to end up needing hospital care, so its hard to say what the current spike in cases will bring.

Community spread is always concerning, he said. Were holding up and were intact and able to manage whats coming but it is a lagging indicator and no one knows what tomorrow will bring.

A spokesman for Dunleavy on Monday afternoon emailed a statement in response to questions from Anchorage Daily News about whether rising case counts might provoke any changes to current mandates that include testing or quarantine for most travelers and a mask requirement in state buildings but not statewide. The governor has said that generally he wants communities to dictate their own COVID-19 policies.

Now Dunleavy and state health officials are closely monitoring the number of cases and are in daily contact with hospital officials about Alaskas hospital capacity, the statement said. While the number of positive cases is climbing, that was anticipated by the Governor and Alaskas public health experts. It is also important to recognize that for every 100 hospital beds that are occupied, only 2 to 4 beds are being used by a patient with COVID-19.

The governor is monitoring the counts and evaluating existing protocols and will make changes to the states approach to managing COVID-19 if warranted, the statement said.

Anchorage Mayor Ethan Berkowitz last week said he wanted to step up enforcement of pandemic precautions and asked businesses to do the right thing in order to avoid more restrictions. Berkowitz said he was looking at options to bring cases down to allow for in-person school but wanted to make sure they were effective and had community acceptance.

Wear the damn mask, if I can quote Chris Wallace, Berkowitz said.

Municipal health officials last week also expressed concern that the citys hospitals could run out of ICU beds by late this month or early November if the ongoing case increases translates to more seriously ill people.

Cases are rising in Europe and other U.S. states especially in the Midwest, Zink said. Surges in other places are followed by similar surges in Alaska.

The other number thats rising is the r0 or r-naught rate that indicates how contagious COVID-19 is right now, according to Tom Hennessy, an infectious disease epidemiologist and affiliate faculty member at the University of Alaska Anchorage. That raises concerns because of the higher risks of infection as Alaskans who spent the long days of summer outside are forced inside as flu season puts more pressure on clinics and hospitals.

Whereas we were kind of in a standoff for about two months, weve now tipped over into a higher risk transmission, both from the standpoint of increased numbers of active cases and increased risk of transmission from those cases to other people, Hennessy said in an interview last week. And thats a very worrisome setting, given everything else weve just talked about people moving indoors, cold and flu season, the potential amplification of that effect. Thats all very concerning and points toward a fall outbreak that could be very dangerous for Alaska.

Johnston said that cutting down the number of cases in Anchorage will continue to be made more challenging by the arrival of cooler weather and shorter days, which make socializing outside more difficult, and demands more creativity.

The best thing people can do is to wear a mask and keep six feet of distance any time theyre around someone not in their immediate household, she said. Weve been at this a while, and we have to find ways to protect ourselves and protect our sanity."

Reporters Morgan Krakow and Emily Goodykoontz contributed to this story.

The rest is here:

Alaska's coronavirus cases are hitting new highs. A summer surge didn't turn into a crisis. Will this one? - Anchorage Daily News

Page 644«..1020..643644645646..650660..»