Category: Corona Virus

Page 634«..1020..633634635636..640650..»

44 new coronavirus cases have been reported in Maine – Bangor Daily News

October 24, 2020

Another 44 coronavirus cases have been reported in Maine, health officials said Saturday.

Saturdays report brings the total number of coronavirus cases in Maine to 6,137. Of those, 5,475 have been confirmed positive, while 662 were classified as probable cases, according to the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

The agency revised Fridays cumulative total to 6,093, down from 6,095, meaning there was an increase of 41 over the previous days report, state data show. As the Maine CDC continues to investigate previously reported cases, some are determined to have not been the coronavirus, or coronavirus cases not involving Mainers. Those are removed from the states cumulative total.

New cases were reported in Androscoggin (4), Aroostook (1), Cumberland (18), Hancock (1), Kennebec (4), Penobscot (1), Sagadahoc (1), Somerset (4), Washington (1) and York (7) counties, state data show. Information about where another case was reported wasnt immediately available.

The seven-day average for new coronavirus cases is 35.4, up from 31.4 a week ago and up from 34 a month ago.

No new deaths were reported Saturday, leaving the statewide death toll at 146. Nearly all deaths have been in Mainers over age 60.

So far, 473 Mainers have been hospitalized at some point with COVID-19, the illness caused by the coronavirus. Of those, eight people are currently hospitalized.

Meanwhile, 10 more people have recovered from the coronavirus, bringing total recoveries to 5,317. That means there are 674 active confirmed and probable cases in the state, which is up from 642 on Thursday.

A majority of the cases 3,627 have been in Mainers under age 50, while more cases have been reported in women than men, according to the Maine CDC.

As of Friday, there had been 576,566 negative test results out of 584,055 overall. About 1.2 percent of all tests have come back positive, Maine CDC data show.

The coronavirus has hit hardest in Cumberland County, where 2,463 cases have been reported and where the bulk of virus deaths 70 have been concentrated. It is one of four counties the others are Androscoggin, Penobscot and York, with 845, 285 and 1,364 cases, respectively where community transmission has been confirmed, according to the Maine CDC.

There are two criteria for establishing community transmission: at least 10 confirmed cases and that at least 25 percent of those are not connected to either known cases or travel. That second condition has not yet been satisfied in other counties.

Other cases have been reported in Aroostook (60), Franklin (74), Hancock (63), Kennebec (309), Knox (58), Lincoln (60), Oxford (158), Piscataquis (10), Sagadahoc (80), Somerset (133), Waldo (143) and Washington (31) counties.

As of Saturday morning, the coronavirus had sickened 8,494,419 people in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as caused 224,005 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University of Medicine.

See original here:

44 new coronavirus cases have been reported in Maine - Bangor Daily News

California Coronavirus Update: Governor Gavin Newsom Fails To Address States Massive Surge In New Infections At Friday Press Conference – Deadline

October 24, 2020

California on Friday reported a massive surge in new coronavirus cases, from 3,707 the day before to 6,141. Thats a number of daily infections not seen in the state since August.

Californias governor, however, failed to mention the high new numbers in a nearly hour-long press conference he participated in on Friday. Gavin Newsom and local officials spoke at length about the governors Project Room Key initiative and took questions from the press. No mention was made of the new spike. Nor was any mention made of the recent furor over the governors restrictions on theme parks, which earlier this week prompted talk of a lawsuit from operators.

Newsom expressed approval at the line of questions at the event on Friday.

Related StoryU.S. Coronavirus Update: Infections in America Hit High Not Seen Since July Peak As Hospitals In Some Smaller States Are Overwhelmed

This is the only one of these things I have ever done where I got so many questions on the topic the event was about, he said with a smile.

The lack of comment is even more remarkable since Newsom has addressed the daily coronavirus numbers at virtually every daytime press conference he has held since the pandemic began. It is also noteworthy as counties across the state struggle to move from more restrictive to less restrictive tiers in the governors reopening plan.

Fridays reported increase in cases is, in part, due to a big data backlog that delayed some test results, especially in Californias biggest county Los Angeles which saw a near record spike in daily infections to 3,600 recorded on Thursday.

L.A. County health officials estimated that about 2,000 of the newly-announced cases were the result of the backlog. That would set the days real total at 1,600, far above the 800-1,000 new cases in the past few weeks and still the largest daily case number recorded since August. But even subtracting the backlog, the spike is still the largest daily new cases total in at least two months. And that 2,000 case backlog means that other recent lower counts were inaccurate.

And there may be even more catching up to come. In its daily coronavirus announcement, the L.A. Department of Public Health said it anticipates receiving additional backlog test results over the next few days. That could mean more big numbers that bring the rolling average of new cases yet higher.

Indeed, Los Angeles County announced 2,773 newly recorded COVID-19 cases on Friday, along with 23 more deaths. That number is, again, far above the 800-1,000 daily cases it has seen recently.

The states coronavirus dashboard on Friday also noted that its results include cases from prior to yesterday, but there was no communication about how many cases in the spike were from pervious days. That is, of course, something the governor could have provided.

The data backlog is reminiscent of the (hopefully) much larger bottleneck that occurred in August, when antiquated state systems stalled reporting on about 300,000 tests.

At the time, Newsom said that the processing system is decades old, one we inherited, and not up to the demands of a pandemic. He said the state has data bases that were never made for the world we live in.

We are committed to addressing these foundational data issues, said the governor in August, before promising a stubborn, long term, grinding effort to create a system that works.

Were not going to justband aid this, said Newsom. We are now accountable, accountable to be transparent in these things.

His director of Health and Human Services, Dr. Mark Ghaly said at the time that the state had nearly quadrupled its capacity to process data over the previous weekend. As part of that, it was able to process all 250,000+ backlogged test records.

No word if the scope of the current backlog is similar or a similar systems failure.

COVID-related deaths reported in the state also spiked on Thursday to 172 before dropping down to 73.

Coronavirus cases nationally also jumped to highs not seen since the July peak of the pandemic. According to Johns Hopkins University, there were 71,671 new infections reported on Friday. Thats the fourth-highest total ever, and less than 4,000 from the previous peak of 77,362 on July 16.Daily cases in the country have grown by nearly 15,000 a day in just the past week infections dipped to 57,519 on 10/17.

The New York Timesreported on Fridaythat hospitalizations have jumped more than 40% across the country in the past month.

Read the rest here:

California Coronavirus Update: Governor Gavin Newsom Fails To Address States Massive Surge In New Infections At Friday Press Conference - Deadline

The Pandemics Real Toll? 300,000 Deaths, and Its Not Just From the Coronavirus – The New York Times

October 24, 2020

Although the pandemic has mostly killed older Americans, the greatest percentage increase in excess deaths has occurred among adults ages 25 to 44, the analysis found.

While the number of deaths among adults ages 45 to 64 increased by 15 percent, and by 24 percent among those ages 65 to 74, deaths increased 26.5 percent among those in their mid-20s to mid-40s, a group that includes millennials.

Among those in the youngest age group, under 25, deaths were 2 percent below average.

People of color also had large percentage increases in excess deaths, compared with previous years. Hispanics experienced a 54 percent increase, while Black people saw a 33 percent rise. Deaths were 29 percent above average for American Indians or Alaska Native people, and 37 percent above average for those of Asian descent.

By comparison, the figure for white Americans was 12 percent, according to the analysis.

The report reviewed deaths from Jan. 26 to Oct. 3 of 2020, and used modeling to compare the weekly tallies with those of corresponding weeks in 2015 through 2019.

The researchers estimated that 299,028 more people than expected died in the United States during that period, with 198,081 deaths attributable to Covid-19 and the rest to other causes.

That estimate is significantly higher than the 216,025 coronavirus deaths officially reported by the C.D.C. as of Oct. 15. (The figure now is nearing 221,000, according to a database maintained by The New York Times.)

[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]

Other researchers have also found greater deaths over all during the pandemic. A study published July 1 in JAMA Internal Medicine reported that deaths from all causes in the United States increased by 122,000 from March 1 to May 30, a figure that was 28 percent higher than the deaths attributed solely to Covid-19 during that period.

Go here to read the rest:

The Pandemics Real Toll? 300,000 Deaths, and Its Not Just From the Coronavirus - The New York Times

Why Cant We See All of the Governments Coronavirus Data? – The New York Times

October 24, 2020

I dont know why the government is withholding some of the information it has gathered, when releasing it would so clearly be in the public interest. Perhaps it is driven by a concern that more data will lead to greater scrutiny and criticism over the handling of the pandemic, or misplaced concern that somehow anonymized tabulations of medical information could infringe on individuals privacy.

Prior administrations, too, have tended to err on the side of releasing less data than more on public health problems. But the urgency of determining how to manage this pandemic requires a much more open and collaborative approach.

For instance, access to information on which mandates were imposed where and details on the number of cases, hospital admission and subsequent deaths could help us decide whether new lockdowns are needed. Shorter closures, along with mask requirements, restrictions on large group gatherings, shutdowns of bars and limits on indoor dining, may be sufficient until a vaccine is widely available.

We may also discover that given the much greater toll being suffered among Black and Hispanic people, strategies like regular testing of essential workers may also be needed.

But the scientific community needs access to the data to give more precise direction. And precision will matter with the changing of the seasons. It is increasingly clear that Covid-19 acts like pneumonia and the flu, which spread more quickly during the winter.

If our forecasts are anywhere close to accurate, hospitals may be overwhelmed in many places as colder weather descends. Our modeling, updated weekly, currently forecasts more than 17,500 daily deaths globally by Jan. 1, nearly 2,250 of them in the United States.

We may be able to prevent many of these deaths, but we need the complete data to start planning now.

Christopher J.L. Murray is the director of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and a professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Read more from the original source:

Why Cant We See All of the Governments Coronavirus Data? - The New York Times

Weighing The Risk: Brown University Professors Create App To Calculate Coronavirus Risk – CBS Boston

October 24, 2020

BOSTON (CBS) Two Brown University professors created an app to establish what activities are safe during the coronavirus pandemic. The app is called My COVID Risk.

Simply enter your location, where you are going, how many people will be going and if they will be wearing masks. The app then calculates your risk of getting COVID-19 from low to high.

It also gives you tips on how to lower your risk.

Dr. Liz Goldberg told WBZ-TV she came up with the idea with her colleague after receiving so many questions about what was safe or not.

People really want to see visuals. What is my risk while going to this particular event, you can make it personal, and then what do I do reduce that risk, Goldberg said. Many of us are concerned about the colder weather, the holidays, people wanting to be indoors. I know that your risk of contracting the virus is higher indoors than outdoors so part of the motivation of this app was to show you that difference in risk when youre indoors versus outdoors and how to plan safe events.

Excerpt from:

Weighing The Risk: Brown University Professors Create App To Calculate Coronavirus Risk - CBS Boston

Coronavirus Tracker: More than 5,000 Texas hospitalized with COVID-19 for first time since August – KENS5.com

October 24, 2020

Facts, not fear: KENS 5 is tracking the latest numbers from the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in San Antonio and across Texas.

SAN ANTONIO We're tracking the latest numbers from the coronavirus pandemic in San Antonio and across Texas. Here are the latest numbers reported by Bexar and surrounding counties:

How Bexar County is trending

We've tracked how many coronavirus cases have been confirmed in Bexar County from the time officials began reporting cases in March 2020. The graphic below shows the number of cases since June and charts those daily case numbers along a 7-day moving average to provide a more accurate picture of the overall coronavirus case curve in our area and the direction we're trending amid the pandemic.

On Friday, San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg reported an additional 247 COVID-19 cases for Bexar County, bringing the total number of cases to 64,261 since the pandemic began. Friday marks the third straight day of more that 200 newly reported cases, the first such three-day span since August 11-13. The county's seven day moving average rose to 177.

The death toll from virus complications remains at 1,232 after no new fatalities were reported.

The number of Bexar County residents receiving treatment for COVID-19 symptoms dropped by one on Friday, to 208. 36 of those patients are on ventilators and 85 are in intensive care.

Coronavirus in Texas

The number of Texans who have tested positive for the coronavirus since the pandemic began grew by 6,472 on Friday, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services.

5,760 of those are new diagnoses over the last 24 hours, while the other 712 cases stem from a number of backlogs in several counties. More details can be found at the top of this page. In all, 851,572 Texans have tested positive for COVID-19.

State health authorities also reported 89 additional virus-related deaths on Friday. At least 17,375 Texans have passed away from COVID-19 complications.

Meanwhile, COVID-19-related hospitalizations jumped once again, continuing a trend in the wrong direction for the state. 134 more Texans were receiving treatment for COVID-19 than Thursday, bringing the current total to 5,065. Friday marked the first time state hospitalizations due to COVID-19 were above 5,000 since August 24, In the last week, hospitalizations have risen 19.2%. Since Oct. 1, they've risen by 58.7%.

Health officials warn that the state is currently in another surge. Experts attribute the spike in COVID-19 numbers to "pandemic fatigue."

The state estimates that 744,283 Texans have recovered, while 85,618 Texans remain ill with COVID-19.

Meanwhile, the Texas Education Agency updated its online coronavirus database to show that there have been 21,013 cumulative cases among staff and students across the state as of Oct. 22. More information can be found here.

The TEA releases new data on school cases every Thursday.

Latest Coronavirus Headlines

Coronavirus symptoms

The symptoms of coronavirus can be similar to the flu or a bad cold. Symptoms include fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, new loss of taste or smell sore throat, congestion or runny nose, nausea or vomiting and diarrhea, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Most healthy people will have mild symptoms. A study of more than 72,000 patients by the Centers for Disease Control in China showed 80 percent of the cases there were mild.

But infections can cause pneumonia, severe acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure, and even death, according to the World Health Organization. Older people with underlying health conditions are most at risk.

But infections can cause pneumonia, severe acute respiratory syndrome, kidney failure, and even death, according to the World Health Organization. Older people with underlying health conditions are most at risk.

Experts determined there was consistent evidence these conditions increase a person's risk, regardless of age:

The CDC believes symptoms may appear anywhere from two to 14 days after being exposed.

Human coronaviruses are usually spread...

Help stop the spread of coronavirus

Read more:

Coronavirus Tracker: More than 5,000 Texas hospitalized with COVID-19 for first time since August - KENS5.com

Minnesota reports more than 2200 new coronavirus infections – Duluth News Tribune

October 24, 2020

After the United States set a new single-day record of most coronavirus infections reported in a single day on Friday, Minnesota reported more than 2,200 new infections on Saturday, Oct. 24.

Of the 2,268 people who have recently tested positive, 12 of them were tested using antigen tests while the remaining were tested using nasal swabs, otherwise known as PCR tests, according to the Minnesota Department of Health. PCR tests identify the genetic makeup of the virus while antigen tests identify specific proteins found in the virus.

Completed diagnostic tests are up by 36,488 in Minnesota. That puts the state's single-day testing positivity rate, meaning the percentage of tests that come back positive, at 6.2%.

Fourteen more Minnesotans have died from COVID-19. The state's death toll from the illness is now 2,328.

Hennepin County recorded three of the news deaths. St. Louis and Stearns counties each recorded two new deaths. Benton, Martin, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Ramsey, Washington and Winona counties each recorded one new death. Nine of them were residents of long-term care or assisted living facilities and the rest had a private residence.

In the last eight months, 132,122 Minnesotans have tested positive for the coronavirus and 116,693, or 88%, of them no longer require isolation, the health department reported Saturday.

In a seven-day period between Oct. 16-23, 488 people with COVID-19 were admitted to a hospital in the state, including intensive care units. ICUs across the state experienced 116 admissions during that time.

As a public service, weve opened this article to everyone regardless of subscription status. If this coverage is important to you, please consider supporting local journalism by clicking on the subscribe button in the upper right-hand corner of the homepage.

Read the original:

Minnesota reports more than 2200 new coronavirus infections - Duluth News Tribune

Is There A Safe Way To Hand Out Candy On Halloween In A Pandemic? : Goats and Soda – NPR

October 24, 2020

The latest pandemic dining twist is the outdoor bubble, seen here at a New York City restaurant. Sure, it's a way to stay warm as winter looms ... but does it reduce your risk of getting infected by COVID-19? Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images hide caption

The latest pandemic dining twist is the outdoor bubble, seen here at a New York City restaurant. Sure, it's a way to stay warm as winter looms ... but does it reduce your risk of getting infected by COVID-19?

Each week, we answer frequently asked questions about life during the coronavirus crisis. If you have a question you'd like us to consider for a future post, email us at goatsandsoda@npr.org with the subject line: "Weekly Coronavirus Questions."

Is it safe to eat in an outdoor plastic dome?

Oh, to dine in a giant plastic bubble ...

It's certainly not the most romantic culinary experience. But post-pandemic? It's kind of the new rave. It's popping up in New York and other cities, too, like San Francisco.

It's easy to understand the quirky appeal of bubbles, igloos, tents or plastic domes whichever term you prefer. Who wouldn't want to say they dined in a giant hamster ball!

Yet experts are worried about the safety implications of using bubbles as an outdoor dining strategy. It may actually be counterproductive.

The reasoning behind the bubble strategy is that shrouded in plastic, diners can withstand the cold air of winter while enjoying the benefits of outdoor dining in a pandemic namely, air flow reduces the risk of transmission of COVID-19.

But a closer look reveals some pitfalls of the strategy, says Dennis Clements, director of the Duke Global Health Institute

"First of all, being outdoors [with no bubble] is a big help," Clements explains. "When you enclose yourself in a bubble, it stops airflow."

Tiffany Harris, associate professor of epidemiology at the Columbia University Medical Center, agrees that cutting off airflow is a big concern for two reasons:

First, she explains, many people are dining with friends who aren't a part of their immediate household. While outdoors, there's wind to act as a buffer and disperse any infectious viral particles, lowering the risk of transmission. But sitting in a bubble effectively erects "artificial walls," doing the opposite i.e. allowing viral particles to linger in the air.

That's not all. Even though restaurants say they're taking care to sanitize the bubbles after every use, Harris still has worries: "I have concerns about everything being cleaned properly and how often cleaning is happening especially given that we don't understand everything about COVID sterilization."

And some questions remain unanswered ... like, how long must one air out a bubble to get a good clean after a party leaves?

And, Clements explains, you're not totally isolated in a dining igloo anyways. Presumably, you would be interacting often with waiters and other restaurant staff, bringing your food and drink.

"If whoever enters the bubble is diseased, their viral particles are contained in the bubble," Clements says. "That ruins the reason for eating outdoors to begin with dispersal of aerosols by breeze."

Our sources agree: As it stands, dining outside a bubble is probably a safer bet than eating inside a bubble. After all, what's the point of sitting outside if the bubble in effect means you're ... inside?

If the concern is cold weather, Harris says eating outdoors with a nearby heat lamp is a safer alternative than bubble warmth.

Is there a safe way to trick-or treat this year?

With Halloween around the corner, parents are struggling with this question.

Experts agree that Halloween cannot look the same as it has in previous years: you at your door happily handing dropping candy into the hands of costumed kids or letting them forage in a bucket full of goodies. The risk, they say, is far too high.

"We certainly don't want people to be opening the door and saying hello to everybody," Dennis Clements, director of the Duke Global Health Institute, says. "You'd be introducing into a close space whatever people are breathing out" and that applies to both the candy hander outer and the recipients.

His view: "There's no good way to do it."

That said, there are some lower-risk ideas that people can consider if they're feeling comfortable, say Clements as well as Harris.

One risk-reduction strategy suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as part of its Halloween guidance and also by Clements and Harris is pre-loading zip-locked baggies with candy and leaving them outside for trick-or-treaters to pick up. That procedure would significantly reduce the amount of contamination that might occur if a parade of kids scoops their bare hands into a huge bowl or jar of candy.

But even the Ziploc idea has weaknesses. What if you are asymptomatic or presymptomatic while preparing the bags?

It's also critical for parents and trick-or-treaters to be conscious of the groups they are traveling in (the gold standard is small groups from one family spread far apart from one another). Health experts also advise that children wear a COVID-19 mask: A regular Halloween mask does not offer as much protection as a COVID mask.

"[The biggest risk is] most likely an issue of cross-contamination from other kids," Clements says.

Harris cautions that even if your community sets certain guidelines, "guidance could change, so it's important to stay abreast of what the big health agencies are saying. Halloween is still a week away, and a lot can change in a week."

With all the risks at play, some are turning to extreme measures to keep Halloween alive ... loading up giant catapults with candy to fling at trick-or-treaters from a distance or sending candy down a chute that would go from a window to the driveway.

When he heard these ideas, Clements chuckled.

"As long as the person loading the machine doesn't have the disease, I guess it's OK," Clements says. "Otherwise you're assisting the spread by some poor guy shooting that stuff out!"

Can the virus enter your body and infect you via the ear canal?

The short answer, our experts say: Probably not.

"While there's no randomized control trials on the question, it's very, very unlikely," Harris explains.

The reason is the type of skin, she says: The skin coating the ear canal is comparable to that on arms and the body, which acts as a natural barrier to the outside world.

On the other hand, the mucosal membrane (aka the lining that covers your eyes and nose) is much more susceptible to external particles.

"I wouldn't worry very much about the ears," Clements says.

Pranav Baskar is a freelance journalist.

Read more:

Is There A Safe Way To Hand Out Candy On Halloween In A Pandemic? : Goats and Soda - NPR

The Coronavirus Has Claimed 2.5 Million Years of Potential Life in the U.S., Study Finds – The New York Times

October 24, 2020

Still, life-years is only one metric by which to measure loss, said Ayesha Mahmud, a health demographer and epidemiologist at the University of California, Berkeley, who was not involved in the analysis. Dr. Mahmud stressed the importance of not undervaluing the lives of older people simply because they might have fewer potential years left a mind-set that can disadvantage older populations and minimize their disease burden.

Several other researchers have published similar observations on the number of years of potential life eliminated by the pandemic.

Every new analysis can serve as an important reminder of the staggering pace at which the coronavirus has torn through the nation, Dr. Mahmud said. For me, whats striking is that this has happened in such a short period of time, she said.

Even losses enumerated by life-years do not represent the full costs exacted by the pandemic, said Maimuna Majumder, an epidemiologist at Boston Childrens Hospital and Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the analysis. Researchers still do not fully understand the long-term repercussions of a coronavirus infection, which can throw the body into flux for months, perhaps longer, often with debilitating symptoms.

Deaths are also not distributed uniformly across the population. Age is certainly one factor that can influence an individuals risk. Dr. Elledges analysis also showed that men, who tend to fare worse against the coronavirus, had lost more potential years of life than women.

People with certain health conditions, including obesity, diabetes and heart disease, are also more likely to become seriously sick if they catch the virus. (Some of these underlying conditions can also reduce life expectancy; Dr. Elledge noted that his analysis was unable to account for this, and that the number of life-years lost in certain cases might have been artificially inflated.)

The pandemic has also had a disproportionate impact on Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native people, who are more likely to contract the coronavirus, and to become severely sick and die once an infection sets in. Roughly one in 920 Black Americans has died from the coronavirus, compared with one in 1,840 white Americans, according to one analysis. Another recent assessment found that the pandemic has more severely reduced life expectancies among Black and Latino populations, compared with their white neighbors. Black Americans already have lower life expectancies than white Americans.

Originally posted here:

The Coronavirus Has Claimed 2.5 Million Years of Potential Life in the U.S., Study Finds - The New York Times

It Has Hit Us With a Vengeance: Coronavirus Surges Again Across the United States – The New York Times

October 23, 2020

With no statewide mask mandate, some mayors are resorting to options they had long resisted. On Monday, the mayor of Fargo used his emergency powers to issue a mandatory mask order, the first of its kind in the state. Hours later, the City Council of Minot, the fourth-largest city in North Dakota, issued a similar order.

We were hoping we had escaped the Covid-19, Mayor Tim Mahoney of Fargo, a practicing surgeon, said in an interview. Now were just like everybody else in the country. It has hit us with a vengeance.

We kind of thought wed outsmart it, and you cant outsmart this virus.

In other parts of the country, officials are also returning to another tried-and-true method of containing the virus: stay-at-home orders. On Tuesday, local health officials ordered students at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor to stay in their residences except for essential activities effective immediately, in an effort to control an escalating community outbreak.

Since Oct. 12, cases associated with the university have made up about 61 percent of confirmed and probable local infections, said Jimena Loveluck, the health officer for Washtenaw County, who warned that many cases have been tied to parties and other big gatherings.

During the day, on campus, everyones fine and following the rules, said Emma Stein, a senior news editor at The Michigan Daily, the student paper, who is now confined at home with her eight roommates. But at night, on weekends, they dont.

The order could leave the campus unusually quiet ahead of Oct. 31, when the university is expected to play its first home football game of the season against its biggest in-state rival, Michigan State. For added deterrence, health officials are considering an extra kick: Within the week, officials said, the health department may start fining people who violate the order to stay at home.

In a sign of how quickly the virus is spreading in many parts of the Midwest and the Great Plains, infections recently overtook a private nursing home in northern Kansas.

Continue reading here:

It Has Hit Us With a Vengeance: Coronavirus Surges Again Across the United States - The New York Times

Page 634«..1020..633634635636..640650..»