Category: Corona Virus

Page 555«..1020..554555556557..560570..»

Active cases of coronavirus rise in Ulster and Dutchess counties; Dutchess offers free rides to vaccination sites – The Daily Freeman

April 11, 2021

Kingston residents Belinda Dankwah, left, Gershom Baah, center, and Millicent Preko hold up their vaccination cards after receiving their second shots at the former Best Buy store in the town of Ulster, N.Y., on Friday April 9, 2021. The three are all home health aides.

Ulster County on Friday reported a small uptick in its number of active coronavirus cases, while Dutchess County reported a more substantial increase.

Editors note: In the interest of public safety, critical coronavirus coverage is being provided free to all readers. Support reporting like thiswith a subscription to the Freeman.

Ulster said it had 1,730 active cases of COVID-19, up just four from the 1,726 reported Thursday. Dutchess reported an increase of 29 actives cases from 1,297 to 1,326 but also a drop in COVID-related hospitalizations from 70 to 63.

Ulster County reported 93 new COVID diagnoses out of the most recent 1,719 test results received a positivity rate of 5.4% and 89 newly designated recoveries from the illness.

Ulster County has had 13,773 confirmed cases of COVID since the local outbreak began in March 2020, as well as 11,797 recoveries and 246 deaths. No additional deaths were reported Friday.

Dutchess County also reported no additional deaths. It has lost 428 residents to COVID since last spring.

Dutchess has had 27,032 confirmed cases of COVID since March 2020 and on Friday reported a seven-day positive test rate of 4.4%.

Dutchess County Executive Marc Molinaro announced Friday that, starting Saturday, the county will provide free rides on its public transit system to anyone who has an appointment at one of the county's two "point of dispensing," or POD, sites, as well as any future pop-up vaccination sites in the county. The county-run POD sites are in the former J.C. Penney store at the Poughkeepsie Galleria and the former CVS store on Route 22 in Dover.

Residents who live within three-quarters of a mile of a regular Dutchess bus route but who cannot use the regular fixed-route service and need transportation to a POD site can get free paratransit service or Dial-A-Ride and Flex Demand Response service by calling (845) 473-8424 in advance. For details, go to dutchessny.gov/publictransit.

Ulster County began free bus ridesto its POD site at Hudson Valley Mall earlier this week.

The college reported Friday that it had 21 active cases of COVID among students and two among employees. The college said nine students were in on-campus quarantine and five were in on-campus isolation.

SUNY New Paltz has had 228 positive COVID-19 cases among students since Jan. 1, and 32 cases among employees during the same period.

Appointments to be vaccinated at state-run sites, including the one at the Ulster County Fairgrounds New Paltz, can be made online atcovid19vaccine.health.ny.gov.

Appointments to be vaccinated at the Ulster County-run site at Hudson Valley Mall in the town of Ulster can be made atvaccinateulster.com, and Dutchess County's vaccination sign-up site isbit.ly/dut-vax.

Greene County said Friday that residents can find a searchable list of vaccination POD sites at VaccineFinder.org.

Newly reported cases of COVID-19 in area school districts are as follows, according to New York state.

Kingston: One on-site J. Watson Bailey Middle School student and one on-site high school student.

Ellenville: Three on-site elementary school students and one on-site high school student.

Highland: One on-site middle school student.

Marlboro: One on-site high school student.

Rondout Valley: Three off-site high school students.

For local coverage related to the coronavirus, go to bit.ly/DFCOVID19.

See original here:

Active cases of coronavirus rise in Ulster and Dutchess counties; Dutchess offers free rides to vaccination sites - The Daily Freeman

With California set to fully reopen by June 15, experts say its unlikely another coronavirus surge will overwhelm hospitals – KTLA Los Angeles

April 11, 2021

Gov. Gavin Newsom has taken criticism on all sides for a series of extremely consequential and politically risky calls over the past year as hes led California through the COVID-19 pandemic.

Now his biggest decision of all, to fully reopen a state of 40 million people for business by June 15, may be one of the safest choices hes made yet.

Public health experts say its unlikely that another surge of the virus would overwhelm the hospital system in California. Absent a new variant or mutation that renders vaccines ineffective across the country, they believe the chance that Newsom would need to reinstate the kinds of restrictions that frustrated some voters and helped fuel the recall effort against him is almost nil.

Im sure they thought long and hard about this and decided to make a bet, and I think the odds are awfully good that theyre going to win it, said Dr. Robert Wachter, professor and chairman of the Department of Medicine at UC San Francisco.

Read the full story on LATimes.com.

Original post:

With California set to fully reopen by June 15, experts say its unlikely another coronavirus surge will overwhelm hospitals - KTLA Los Angeles

Hawaii DOH investigating 2 sports teams halted due to coronavirus – KHON2

April 9, 2021

HONOLULU (KHON2) The Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) is looking into a couple of sports teams that have had to stop practice because of COVID-19.

The DOH is investigating a cluster affecting the University of Hawaii (UH) football team in the latest cluster report where there were eight positive cases and 81 student-athletes had to be quarantined.

[Hawaiis Breaking NewsDownload the FREE KHON2 app for iOS or Android]

UH football officials announced on Monday, April 5, that spring practice and in-person activities were paused. UH says there have been no more additional cases and the total number remains at eight as of Thursday, April 8.

DOH officials say a high school volleyball team also stopped practice after a player tested positive. This team member was exposed to COVID-19 during a gathering with friends and family over spring break. The other team members tested negative so far and remain in quarantine.

There are 32 cases on the Big Island under educational settings. KHON2 was told that cluster is on the west side of the island.

To our understanding it is just a few students who tested positive that ended up spreading in a small institution, said Communications Director Cyrus Johnasen.

There were 12 cases under social gatherings and six for places of worship.

At this time, we dont believe any of the clusters whether big or small on Hawaii Island are going to spread any further than they already have based upon the data that we have so far, said Hawaii County spokesperson Cyrus Johnasen.

More here:

Hawaii DOH investigating 2 sports teams halted due to coronavirus - KHON2

Ohio coronavirus case rate increases to highest point in a month; 52 counties on red alert – cleveland.com

April 9, 2021

CLEVELAND, Ohio - The rate of new coronavirus cases in Ohio is now worse than it was a month ago when Gov. Mike DeWine announced his plans to eventually lift his health orders amid what was then a fast shrinking number of cases.

The Ohio Department of Health on Thursday reported a rate of 183.7 cases per 100,000 people with an onset of symptoms over the last two weeks, up from 167.1 a week ago.

This is far from the rate of 50 cases per 100,000 the governor set on March 4 as the number he wants to see before he will lift all his health orders, ranging from mandated masks in public to limits on patrons in restaurants and entertainment venues.

At the time, the rate had been going down for months to near 179 cases per 100,000, and it continued to sink for the next two weeks, dropping to a low for the year of 143.8 per 100,000 with the March 18 update. But it has gone up each of the last three weeks.

The rate was last below 50 in June, and as high as 845.5 per 100,000 in mid-December.

Were moving now in the wrong direction., DeWine said during Thursdays coronavirus briefing. Were not seeing the runaway case growth we saw during the fall, certainly not yet. We can still turn this around if more people continue to get vaccinated. This is a race. We are in a race. Its a life and death race.

About 1-in-3 Ohioans has received at least one vaccination, with vaccinations complete for about a fifth the states population, the health department reported.

The case rate is based on when people reported becoming sick, not when the cases were reported by the state. And it excludes incarcerated individuals in an effort to focus on community spread issues.

Not only have reported cases increased, so have hospitalizations. The 1,193 coronavirus patients hospitalized each of the last two days were the highest patient counts since Feb. 27, according to daily surveys by the Ohio Hospital Association.

The number was as low as 823 on March, and was below 1,000 every day from March 5 through March 31.

Ohio's coronavirus rate has been increasing the last few weeks. The rate is based on cases with an onset of symptoms in the two weeks prior to the date listed in the chart.Rich Exner, cleveland.com

Its clear that Ohio and the nation are enduring yet another wave of COVID-19. This time it is being driven by the new variants of the original virus, said Dr. Bruce Vanderhoff, the states chief medical officer.

Vanderhoff said the B.1.1.7 variant, first identified in the United Kingdom, accounts for the lions share of our total for cases tied to variants. Vanderhoff said B.1.1.7 is not only more contagious; its also more deadly. Yet he said the vaccinations appear to be doing the job against the new variants.

Fatal numbers related to the variant were not provided. However, it often is weeks or months before deaths are confirmed to be related to the coronavirus by the state.

Meanwhile, on Thursday the state updated its coronavirus alert map, with 52 counties now listed on red alert over concern of spread of the virus. This includes Cuyahoga County and each of the six neighboring counties in Greater Cleveland.

A week ago 51 counties were listed on red alert in the states coronavirus advisory system. This compared with 55, 66, 76, 80 and 84 red alert counties in previous weeks.

Putnam was upgraded from orange to the higher level of red, DeWine said. Carroll, Mercer and Morgan went from the lowest concern level of yellow to orange.

Level 3 red alert, according to the health department, means there remains a public emergency for increased exposure and spread, and that people should exercise a high degree of caution. The alert system takes into account more than just new case rates, but also trends in hospitalizations, doctor visits and emergency room visits related to COVID-19.

Case rates by county range from 25 per 100,000 in Holmes County to highs of 336.5 in Hancock County, 300 in Lucas County and 291.1 in Summit County.

* Cuyahoga: 237.2 per 100,000 this week versus 194.3, 167, 162 and 190.6 in the updates each of the previous four weeks.

* Geauga: 128.1 versus 123.9, 106.8, 122.8 and 147.4 the last four weeks.

* Lake: 192.9 versus 136.9, 126, 149.5 and 160.8.

* Lorain: 204.6 versus 198.8, 148.5, 143 and 159.1.

* Medina County: 178 versus 178, 190.8, 206.4 and 189.7.

* Portage County: 213 versus 211.1, 186.5, 164.3 and 155.7.

* Summit County: 291.1 versus 267.3, 219, 203.7 and 184.3.

Heres a closer look at the advisory system introduced in early July. Alert levels are determined by the number of warning benchmarks met. But once a county reaches red alert, it does not drop unless its rate of new cases also drops below 100 per 100,000 over two weeks.

* 1. New cases - Alert triggered when there are 50 new cases per cases 100,000 residents over the last two weeks.

* 2. Increase in new cases - Alert triggered by an increase in cases for five straight days at any point over the last three weeks. This is based on the date of onset of symptoms, not when the cases are reported.

* 3. Non-congregate living cases - Alert triggered when at least 50% of the new cases in one of the last three weeks have occurred in outside congregate living spaces such as nursing homes and prisons.

* 4. Emergency rooms - Alert triggered when there is an increase in visits for COVID-like symptoms or a diagnosis for five straight days at any point in the last three weeks.

* 5. Doctor visits - Alert triggered when there is an increase in out-patient visits resulting in confirmed cases or suspected diagnosis for COVID-19 for five straight days at any point in the last three weeks.

* 6. Hospitalizations - Alert triggered when there is an increase in new COVID-19 patients for five straight days at any point over the last three weeks. This is based on the county or residence, not the location of the hospital.

* 7. Intensive Care Unit occupancy - Alert triggered when ICU occupancy in a region exceeds 80% of total ICU beds and at least 20% of the beds are being used for coronavirus patients for at least three days in the last week.

Rich Exner, data analysis editor for cleveland.com, writes about numbers on a variety of topics. Follow on Twitter @RichExner. See other data-related stories at cleveland.com/datacentral.

Previous stories

How close is your ZIP code to reaching the goal of 50 coronavirus cases per 100,000, set by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine?

How do 2021 births and deaths factor into payments under the third stimulus package? - Thats Rich! Q&A

Ohios casinos, racinos crush revenue records with big March, free of overnight curfews and return of poker rooms

Cases of coronavirus in Ohio nursing homes dip this week, running counter to overall increase statewide

Ohio coronavirus cases up 16.5% in last week; hospital patient count highest since March 2 - see latest statewide, county trends

Excerpt from:

Ohio coronavirus case rate increases to highest point in a month; 52 counties on red alert - cleveland.com

Nearly half of new coronavirus infections nationwide are in just five states – WJW FOX 8 News Cleveland

April 9, 2021

Editors Note: The video above is Gov. DeWine talking about COVID-19 in Ohio.

(AP) Nearly half of new coronavirus infections nationwide are in just five states a situation that is putting pressure on the federal government to consider changing how it distributes vaccines by sending more doses to hot spots.

New York, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey together reported 44% of the nations new COVID-19 infections, or nearly 197,500 new cases, in the latest available seven-day period, according to state health agency data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Total U.S. infections during the same week numbered more than 452,000.

The heavy concentration of new cases in states that account for 22% of the U.S. population has prompted some experts and elected officials to call for President Joe Bidens administration to ship additional vaccine doses to those places. So far, the White House has shown no signs of shifting from its policy of dividing vaccine doses among states based on population.

Sending extra doses to places where infection numbers are climbing makes sense, said Dr. Elvin H. Geng, a professor in infectious diseases at Washington University. But its also complicated. States that are more successfully controlling the virus might see less vaccine as a result.

You wouldnt want to make those folks wait because they were doing better, Geng said. On the other hand, it only makes sense to send vaccines to where the cases are rising.

The spike in cases has been especially pronounced in Michigan, where the seven-day average of daily new infections reached 6,719 cases Sunday more than double what it was two weeks earlier. Only New York reported higher case numbers. And California and Texas, which have vastly larger populations than Michigan, are reporting less than half its number of daily infections.

Though Michigan has seen the highest rate of new infections in the past two weeks, Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has said she does not plan to tighten restrictions. She has blamed the virus surge on pandemic fatigue, which has people moving about more, as well as more contagious variants.

Taking steps back wasnt going to fix the issue, Whitmer said as she got her first vaccine Tuesday at Ford Field in Detroit, home of the NFLs Lions. What we have to do is really put our foot down on the pedal on vaccines and urge people to wear masks, keep their social distance and wash their hands.

Whitmer got the shot the day after Michigan expanded eligibility to everyone 16 and older. She asked the White House last week during a conference call with governors whether it has considered sending extra vaccine to states battling virus surges. She was told all options were on the table.

In New York City, vaccination appointments are still challenging to get. Mayor Bill de Blasio has publicly harangued the federal government about the need for a bigger vaccine allotment almost daily, a refrain he repeated when speaking to reporters Tuesday.

We still need supply, supply, supply, de Blasio said, before adding, But things are really getting better.

On the state level, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has not called publicly for an increase in New Yorks vaccine allotment, even as cases ticked up in recent weeks and the number of hospitalized people hit a plateau.

In New Jersey, where the seven-day rolling average of daily new infections has risen over the past two weeks, from 4,050 daily cases to 4,250, Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy said he is constantly talking to the White House about demand for the coronavirus vaccine, though he stopped short of saying he was lobbying for more vaccines because of the states high infection rate.

Vaccine shipments to New Jersey were up 12% in the last week, Murphy said Monday, though he questioned whether thats enough.

We constantly look at, OK, we know were going up, but are we going up at the rate we should be, particularly given the amount of cases we have? Murphy said.

New virus variants are clearly one of the drivers in the increase, said Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, chair of the department of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California at San Francisco. Failure to suppress the rise in cases will lead to more people getting sick and dying, she said, and drive increases in other parts of the country.

More vaccine needs to be where the virus is, Bibbins-Domingo said, adding that people should get over the scarcity mindset that has them thinking surging vaccine into one place will hurt people elsewhere.

In Florida, relaxed safeguards during a busy spring break season likely helped spread virus variants, said University of South Florida epidemiologist Jason Salemi. The states seven-day average of daily new infections has exceeded 5,400, an increase of 20% in the past two weeks.

While many new infections appear to be among younger people, Salemi said hes worried about Floridas seniors. About 78% of residents age 65 and older have received at least one vaccine dose, but roughly 1 million more still have not gotten any shots.

We seemingly have the supply, Salemi said. Are these people not planning to get vaccinated?

Talk of sending extra shots to some states comes at a time when the number of daily infections in the U.S. has fallen dramatically compared to a January spike following the holiday season. However, the seven-day average of daily infections been rising slowly since mid-March.

The five states seeing the most infections stand out. As of Tuesday, 31 U.S. states were reporting seven-day averages of fewer than 1,000 new daily cases.

White House coronavirus coordinator Jeff Zients said Tuesday more than 28 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines will be delivered to states this week. That allocation will bring the U.S. total to more than 90 million doses distributed in the past three weeks.

The news came as Biden announced more than 150 million coronavirus shots have been administered since he took office, and that all adults will be eligible to receive a vaccine by April 19.

About 40% of U.S. adults have now received at least one COVID-19 shot, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 23% of American adults have been fully vaccinated including more than half of Americans 65 and older.

Geng said the nation should take a step back and go slow. Even just a few more weeks of Americans sticking with social distancing and other precautions could make a huge difference.

The take-home message here is, lets not jump the gun, Geng said. Theres light at the end of the tunnel. We all see it there. And we will get there. Slow and steady.

Read the rest here:

Nearly half of new coronavirus infections nationwide are in just five states - WJW FOX 8 News Cleveland

Coronavirus or allergies? Heres how to tell the difference. – SILive.com

April 9, 2021

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. Its more than a year into the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and every cough, sniffle and sneeze can still scare some into thinking they may have the virus.

But spring weather and warmer temperatures mark the return of trees and flowers blooming, along with pollen spreading far and wide. So its possible that those symptoms of common allergies could be mistaken for a case of COVID-19.

It should also be noted that a harsh allergy season is expected this year, according to AccuWeathers annual spring allergy forecast. Some parts of the United States could experience an early or extended season, and other areas could experience higher-than-usual pollen counts.

And the coronavirus could add another layer of complexity. Seasonal allergy symptoms can be complicated, as some symptoms -- such as congestion, stuffy nose and feeling a bit unwell -- appear similar to COVID-19.

*** CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS IN NEW YORK ***

So how can you spot the difference between allergies and the coronavirus?

The easiest way to tell the difference is if you have a sustained fever a tell-tale sign of COVID-19. If your temperature is 100 degrees or higher, youre probably not suffering from allergies and you should get tested for the virus. Many people who contract COVID-19 also report a new loss of taste or smell, a symptom not linked to allergies.

The most common allergy symptoms are sneezing, runny or stuffy nose, and water and itchy eyes, according to FamilyAllergy.com none of which are usual symptoms of the coronavirus. So if youre sniffling and sneezing, rather than coughing, youre likely dealing with allergies and not COVID-19.

Allergies can sometimes result in coughing, shortness of breath, and wheezing, but theyre far less common, FamilyAllergy.com states.

If you usually take allergy medication to ease symptoms, and you notice its not working like it usually does, you may want to check your symptoms again and get a coronavirus test.

To recap, here are the most common symptoms of COVID-19:

Here are the most common symptoms of allergies:

There are some ways you can avoid your worst allergens this spring and summer season by taking steps to minimize your exposure to pollen and symptoms, according to AccuWeather Senior Meteorologist Alan Reppert.

After it rains is normally a good time [to avoid allergens], he said. Before it rains, theres a lot more pollen in the air, and it can be washed out with the rain that comes through.

But he warned that some people suffer from thunderstorm-related pollen allergies, as it can be lofted into the air as a storm moves in. He also said morning hours are ideal for evading pollen. Keeping windows closed can prevent bringing pollen or other allergens into your home. And there are many over-the-counter allergy medications people can take as needed.

FOLLOW ANNALISE KNUDSON ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER.

Follow this link:

Coronavirus or allergies? Heres how to tell the difference. - SILive.com

After coronavirus pause, UND football returns to practice in hopes of making a playoff run – Grand Forks Herald

April 9, 2021

UND returned to workouts Monday and practiced Tuesday and Thursday as it nears preparation for the final regular-season game of the year at Youngstown State on April 17.

"It was better already (Thursday)," UND coach Bubba Schweigert said. "We're still getting guys back. As we get guys back, we have to make sure we're conditioning them to be ready to have a preparation week, which starts Sunday."

It's an important reset for UND, which will return to action for the first time since March 20, with a lot on the line.

At 4-1, the Hawks are still in contention for the Missouri Valley Football Conference title.

Four games remain on the league schedule, and each game involves a team that is currently tied for first place in the league standings (UND, North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State).

According to the MVFC, the results of those four games can result in 16 different outcomes and only NDSU controls its own destiny to receive the league's automatic berth to the FCS playoffs.

Of the remaining 16 scenarios, there are six ways SDSU can win the AQ, five ways for NDSU, four for UND and one for Missouri State.

Schweigert said he doesn't shy away from addressing with the team what's at stake.

"This is something we've got to take advantage of when you have that opportunity," Schweigert said. "Youngstown has our attention. When you look at them from the first game to the fourth or fifth, they've improved a lot. It's a new coaching staff, and we understand it takes guys a while to adjust."

On Thursday, UND was announced as one of 14 possible host sites for the FCS playoffs.

"We need to put ourselves in the best position to move on and the way to do that is to win this game," Schweigert said. "This is a chance to be at the top of the league and be selected for the playoffs. You don't want to scoreboard watch this time of year. You control what you can control and what we can control is our preparation for Youngstown State and perform at our best next Saturday."

If UND doesn't receive the AQ for winning the MVFC, only six at-large bids are available for this spring's FCS playoffs. That's down from the usual 14 bids during a normal fall season.

UND was ranked No. 5 earlier this month when the FCS released its first and only seeding projections. With the help of UND's win over South Dakota State earlier this spring, the Fighting Hawks would almost certainly be in the field with a win over Youngstown.

"Our captains and leaders have done a great job keeping guys in the moment," Schweigert said. "Was (the pause) a challenge? No doubt. But by the weekend, we feel like we'll have everybody back and then we can get into game-week prep like any other game week."

Continued here:

After coronavirus pause, UND football returns to practice in hopes of making a playoff run - Grand Forks Herald

The American Rescue Plan: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – AAF – American Action Forum

April 9, 2021

Executive Summary

Introduction

State and local governments have been at the front lines in combating the COVID-19 pandemic and have been charged with administering a substantial share of the household relief provided by Congress. On a bipartisan basis, federal policymakers have recognized the vital role of these subnational governments in the public health and economic crisis and have provided them with hundreds of billions in supplemental funding. Since last year, however, both the health and economic conditions of the country have improved although the virus itself remains a threat and aggregate subnational government revenues are even up over last year.

Despite these improvements, the recently enacted American Rescue Plan (ARP) provides over $350 billion in new funding for state, local, tribal, and territorial governments. Paired with the funding are vague restrictions on the use of the relief funds that at once appear to grant wide latitude to spend the federal funds but also introduce complexity and uncertainty around those allowable uses. The ARPs restrictions on using the funds to offset revenue reductions is particularly problematic. While the restrictions may seem simple, the ARP does not provide adequate clarity on how these restrictions may interact with other policies including those otherwise implemented in the ARP and by the administration.

State and Local Assistance Funding

In March, the president signed into law the ARP, a $1.9 trillion spending bill nominally related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the major provisions in the new law are substantial appropriations $362.05 billion for state, local, municipal, tribal, and territorial government fiscal assistance. The pandemic has had disparate impacts on communities throughout the United States, and given the scale of the COVID-19 challenge, federal support to subnational governments has been an important component of the federal response to the pandemic. In the preceding COVID-19 bills, Congress appropriated about $212 billion in aid to such governments. As these measures were being debated and considered, state governors were engaged in a vocal lobbying effort for $500 billion in direct federal aid to make up for projected revenue shortfalls. That interested parties may lobby Congress for more than they may need is hardly new, and given the uncertainty surrounding the economic and public health outlook, the governors concerns over potential budget shortfalls affecting public services were not wholly unreasonable.

The passage of time, trillions in federal expenditures, and the miracle of modern medical innovation has allayed the worst fears for states and localities bottom lines, however. A year after the pandemic began, the data show that in the aggregate, state and local tax revenue is up about 2 percent from last year. Some states are enjoying something of a revenue boom. To be sure, not every state is awash in new tax revenue tourism-dependent Hawaii and oil-dependent Alaska and North Dakota have seen significant drops in revenue. But states that base their budgets on oil are necessarily exposed to price fluctuations and plan accordingly, or should reconsider their tax policies. The upshot is that while there have been some legitimate needs, the subnational funding in the ARP is excessive as much as 116 times the needs by one measure. The $362 billion pot of funding is somewhat of a policy in search of problem.

Allowable Use of Funds

While the aid aims to strengthen the fiscal position of subnational governments, numerous restrictions both undermine this goal and venture more into states authority to determine their own tax and spending priorities than is typical of the federal government. When Congress appropriates funds, it specifies how those funds may be used and for how long the funding is available. The ARP similarly provides for two tranches of funding for state and local governments in sections 602 and 603 of the legislation, respectively. Section 602 establishes the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSFRF) and provides $219.8 billion for states, territories, and tribal governments, plus $50 million for administrative expenses. The funding is available until the end of 2024. Similarly, section 603 establishes the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CLFRF) and provides $130.2 billion for cities, counties, and other local governments, which is also available through the end of 2024. The stated purpose of both funds is to mitigate the fiscal effects stemming from the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).

While simple enough in concept, the respective Relief Funds come with some additional restrictions and conditions that are somewhat complex and internally inconsistent. The funds provided under these sections may be used for four major categories of approved spending. The first allowable use is to respond to the public health emergency with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality. The second allows for providing premium pay to eligible workers. The third condition allows for the funds to be used for the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue experienced by the governmental entity. Finally, the funds provided under sections 602 and 603 may be used to make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure. Fundamentally, these conditions allow subnational governments to provide direct aid to households and businesses, provide funds for public and private essential workers, fund operating budgets, and make certain approved capital expenditures with the federal funds. The statute precludes making pension fund contributions.

The legislation empowers the Secretary of the Treasury to recoup funds that do not comport with the restrictions and adjust on a pro-rata basis the disbursements to subnational governments. As highlighted by the Senate Finance Committee, however, the allowable use of funds introduces a number of complications and requires substantial clarification from Treasury to identify just what states and localities can and cant do with these funds. The ARP requires states and localities to certify that they need the funds provided and for the allowable uses. Yet there remains considerable uncertainty over what the full scope of those allowable uses are, and what criteria receiving governments may use to assess compliance with the funds restrictions.

Revenue Restrictions

Where the ARP goes more afield than typical and introduces a degree of incoherence to the overall policy is in Sec. 602(c)(2)(A), which requires that the relevant funding cannot be used to:

either directly or indirectly offset a reduction in the net tax revenue of such State or territory resulting from a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation during the covered period that reduces any tax (by providing for a reduction in a rate, a rebate, a deduction, a credit, or otherwise) or delays the imposition of any tax or tax increase.

It seems plain that the intent of the legislation is to prevent subnational governments from giving tax cuts to their citizens while receiving federal funds. On its face that seems a reasonable limitation if the goal of the policy is to stabilize subnational governments suffering profound revenue declines due to an international pandemic. But the policy is somewhat more ambitious and allows for the funds to be used to provide households, families, and institutions relief. The restriction on funds being used to indirectly offset a reduction in revenues through any number of legislative or administrative state actions is somewhat more puzzling and heavy-handed.

While one can understand not wanting to subsidize state-level tax reductions through federal funds, the restriction on indirect reductions and the mechanisms for those indirect reductions contemplated in the legislation (e.g. changes in law, regulations, or administrative interpretations) is at odds with other policies put in place by the administration and Congress. For example, in the ARP, Congress exempted up to $10,200 from federal taxation. If the national policy is to provide unemployment insurance benefits tax-free, what is the rationale for precluding states from adopting a similar policy, as 602(c)(2)(A) would appear to do? The Internal Revenue Service recently announced a delay in the tax filing deadline; would states lose funding under 602(c)(2)(A) for following suit? The Tax Foundation has explored additional scenarios that demonstrate the confounding nature of this policy.

In general, the excessive funding, paired with vague and complicated restrictions, lend a sense of incoherence to the policy. The legislation at once grants subnational governments the authority to make determinations as to how much revenue has been lost due to COVID-19 for the purposes of using the federal funds to finance government services, but as a policy matter precludes those governments from using the state tax code to deliver assistance to households and businesses. As Treasury Secretary Yellen observed in recent testimony before Congress, these restrictions raise thorny questions as to how these purportedly struggling states can use the federal funds. Legislation introduced by members of the Senate Finance Committee would obviate at least some of these thorns by eliminating the revenue-related restrictions.

Conclusion

After a year of vocal lobbying, state and localities secured $362 billion in additional funding, paired with a number of restrictions on how those funds can be used. The legislation allows for fairly varied uses of the funds for spending, and grants these governments apparent latitude in some areas while simultaneously highly restricting the disposition of funds in others. These restrictions may complicate the efficient and timely use of these funds and may expose states and localities to recoupment at a later date. The ARP further restricts the use of these funds to preclude the funds being used to offset any reduction in revenue. In practice, this policy introduces some needless confusion and complexity for states and stands at odds with other policies enacted in the ARP and elsewhere.

Read more here:

The American Rescue Plan: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - AAF - American Action Forum

Virus Variants Threaten to Draw Out the Pandemic, Scientists Say – The New York Times

April 9, 2021

For weeks, the mood in much of the United States has been buoyant. Cases, hospitalizations and deaths from the coronavirus have fallen steeply from their highs, and millions of people are being newly vaccinated every day. Restaurants, shops and schools have reopened. Some states, like Texas and Florida, have abandoned precautions altogether.

In measurable ways, Americans are winning the war against the coronavirus. Powerful vaccines and an accelerating rollout all but guarantee an eventual return to normalcy to backyard barbecues, summer camps and sleepovers.

But it is increasingly clear that the next few months will be painful. So-called variants are spreading, carrying mutations that make the coronavirus both more contagious and in some cases more deadly.

Even as vaccines were authorized late last year, illuminating a path to the pandemics end, variants were trouncing Britain, South Africa and Brazil. New variants have continued to pop up in California one week, in New York and Oregon the next. As they take root, these new versions of the coronavirus threaten to postpone an end to the pandemic.

At the moment, most vaccines appear to be effective against the variants. But public health officials are deeply worried that future iterations of the virus may be more resistant to the immune response, requiring Americans to queue up for regular rounds of booster shots or even new vaccines.

We dont have evolution on our side, said Devi Sridhar, a professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. This pathogen seems to always be changing in a way that makes it harder for us to suppress.

Health officials acknowledge an urgent need to track these new viruses as they crawl across the United States. Already, B.1.1.7, the highly contagious variant that walloped Britain and is wreaking havoc in continental Europe, is rising exponentially in the United States.

Limited genetic testing has turned up more than 12,500 cases, many in Florida and Michigan. As of March 13, the variant accounted for about 27 percent of new cases nationwide, up from just 1 percent in early February.

The Biden administration has pledged a down payment of $200 million to ramp up surveillance, an infusion intended to make it possible to analyze 25,000 patient samples each week for virus variants. Its an ambitious goal: The country was sequencing just a few hundred samples each week in December, then scaling up to about 9,000 per week as of March 27.

Until recently, B.1.1.7s rise was camouflaged by falling rates of infection overall, lulling Americans into a false sense of security and leading to prematurely relaxed restrictions, researchers say.

The best way to think about B.1.1.7 and other variants is to treat them as separate epidemics, said Sebastian Funk, a professor of infectious disease dynamics at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Were really kind of obscuring the view by adding them all up to give an overall number of cases.

Other variants identified in South Africa and Brazil, as well as some virus versions first seen in the United States, have been slower to spread. But they, too, are worrisome, because they contain a mutation that diminishes the vaccines effectiveness. Just this week, an outbreak of P.1, the variant that crushed Brazil, forced a shutdown of the Whistler Blackcomb ski resort in British Columbia.

The world is caught in a sprint between vaccines and variants, and the shots eventually will win, scientists say. But because each infection gives the coronavirus a chance to evolve still further, vaccinations in the United States and elsewhere must proceed as fast as possible.

Infections are rising again, driven to an uncertain degree by B.1.1.7 and other variants. Earlier this week, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pleaded with Americans to continue to practice masking and social distancing, saying she felt a sense of impending doom.

We have so much to look forward to so much promise and potential of where we are and so much reason for hope, she said. But right now Im scared.

The coronavirus was supposed to be slow to change shape. Like all viruses, it would pick up mutations and evolve into thousands of variants, scientists said at the beginning of the pandemic. But it would not change significantly for years a stupid virus, some called it.

The pathogen defied those predictions. We expected the virus to change, said Dr. Michael Diamond, a viral immunologist at Washington University in St. Louis. We didnt quite anticipate how quickly it was going to occur.

A variant is of concern only if it is more contagious, causes more severe disease, or blunts the immune response. The variants identified in Britain, South Africa, Brazil and California all fit the criteria.

B.1.1.7, the first to come to widespread attention, is about 60 percent more contagious and 67 percent more deadly than the original form of the virus, according to the most recent estimates.

April 8, 2021, 9:44 p.m. ET

The variant is no different from the original in how it spreads, but infected people seem to carry more of the virus and for longer, said Katrina Lythgoe, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Oxford. Youre more infectious for more days, she said.

So contagious is B.1.1.7 that Britain succeeded in driving down infections only after nearly three months of strict stay-at-home orders, plus an aggressive vaccination program. Even so, cases fell much more slowly than they did during a similar lockdown in March and April.

In continental Europe, a wave of B.1.1.7 cases was building for months, mostly unnoticed beneath a steady churn of infections. The variant wave is now cresting.

Polands rate of daily new cases has quintupled since mid-February, forcing the closure of most public venues. Germanys has doubled, triggering a ban on nighttime gatherings in Berlin.

In France, where B.1.1.7 is causing three-quarters of new infections, some hospitals have had to move coronavirus patients to Belgium to free up beds. Roughly as many people are dying each day from Covid-19 in Europe as were this time a year ago.

For too long, government officials disregarded the threat. Case plateaus can hide the emergence of new variants, said Carl Pearson, a research fellow at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. And the higher those plateaus are, the worse the problem is.

In the United States, coronavirus infections began a rapid decline in January, soon prompting many state leaders to reopen businesses and ease restrictions. But scientists repeatedly warned that the drop would not last. After the rate bottomed out at about 55,000 cases and 1,500 deaths per day in mid-March, some states notably Michigan began seeing an uptick.

Since then, the national numbers have steadily risen. As of Saturday, the daily count was up to nearly 69,000, and the weekly average was 19 percent higher than the figure two weeks earlier.

Even when cases were falling, researchers questioned the notion that vaccinations were the reason. Millions of Americans are immunized every day, but even now only 31 percent have received a single dose of a vaccine, and just 17 percent of the population have full protection, leaving a vast majority susceptible.

The fact is that were still in a position now where we dont have enough vaccinated people, said Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research in San Diego. And if we, like Texas, say were done with Covid-19, B.1.1.7 will come in and remind us that we are not right. I have no doubt about it.

The variant is particularly pervasive in Florida, where the state lifted restrictions and initially did not see a surge. Officials in other states cited this as a rationale for reopening. But now Floridas infection rate is curving upward.

The variant may only have been obscured by what scientists like to call seasonality. Respiratory infections are usually rare in Florida in the spring, noted Sarah Cobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago. Coronavirus infections peaked in Florida last year in the summer, as heat drove people indoors, and may do so again.

I still dont think were out of the woods, Dr. Cobey said, referring to the country at large. If we dont have another wave this spring, then Im going to be really, really worried about the fall.

While most vaccines are effective against B.1.1.7, researchers are increasingly concerned about other variants that contain a mutation called E484K. (Scientists often refer to it, appropriately, as Eek.)

This mutation has evolved independently in many variants worldwide, suggesting that it offers the virus a powerful survival advantage.

In laboratory studies, the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines seem to be slightly less effective against B.1.351, the variant identified in South Africa. That variant contains the Eek mutation, which seems to enable the virus to partly sidestep the bodys immune response. The vaccines made by Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Novavax were even less potent against B.1.351.

I think for the next year or two, E484K will be the most concerning mutation, said Jesse Bloom, an evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

The mutation slightly alters the so-called spike protein sitting on the surface of the coronavirus, making it just a bit harder for antibodies to latch on and destroy the invader.

The good news is that the virus seems to have just a few survival tricks in its bag, and that makes it easier for scientists to find and block those defenses. Im feeling pretty good about the fact that there arent that many choices, said Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University in New York.

The Eek mutation seems to be the viruss primary defense against the immune system. Researchers in South Africa recently reported that a new vaccine directed against B.1.351 ought to fend off all other variants, as well.

Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna already are testing newly designed booster shots against B.1.351 that should work against any variants known to blunt the immune response.

Instead of a new vaccine against variants, however, it may be just as effective for Americans to receive a third dose of the Pfizer-BioNtech or Moderna vaccines in six months to a year, said Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

That would keep antibody levels high in each recipient, overwhelming any variant a more practical strategy than making a specialized vaccine for each new variant that emerges, he said.

My only concern about chasing all the variants is that youd almost be playing Whac-A-Mole, you know, because theyll keep coming up and keep coming up, Dr. Fauci said.

In one form or another, the new coronavirus is here to stay, many scientists believe. Multiple variants may be circulating in the country at the same time, as is the case for common cold coronaviruses and influenza. Keeping them at bay may require an annual shot, like the flu vaccine.

The best way to deter the emergence of dangerous variants is to keep cases down now and to immunize the vast majority of the world not just the United States as quickly as possible. If significant pockets of the globe remain unprotected, the virus will continue to evolve in dangerous new ways.

This might be something that we have to deal with for a long time, said Rosalind Eggo, an epidemiologist at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Still, she added, Even if it changes again, which it is very likely to do, we are in a better, much stronger position than a year ago to deal with it.

Read the rest here:

Virus Variants Threaten to Draw Out the Pandemic, Scientists Say - The New York Times

What Washington parents should know about COVID-19 vaccines for 16- and 17-year-olds – KING5.com

April 9, 2021

Sixteen- and 17-year-olds in Washington may need consent from a parent or guardian before getting a COVID-19 vaccine, the state Department of Health said.

SEATTLE While everyone 16 and older in Washington state will be eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine starting April 15, there are some limitations 16- and 17-year-olds should know before signing up and going to an appointment.

The Washington State Department of Health (DOH) said16- and 17-year-olds are still considered minors and need consent from a parent or guardian to get a vaccine, unless they are legally emancipated.

However, minors may receive immunizations without parental consent under Washington states Mature Minor Doctrine. (Click here to learn more about the Mature Minor Doctrine.)

Additionally, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is the only vaccine approved for people ages 16 and older. Both Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are studying the safety and effectiveness of their vaccines in minors, but are currently only authorized for people over the age of 18.

The DOH said it is working to add the type of COVID-19 vaccine to its Vaccine Locator tool. If the vaccine type is not listed while making an appointment for 16- and 17-year-olds, residents may need to contact the provider or find a different location.

Last week, Pfizer announced its COVID-19 vaccine is safe and strongly protective in kids as young as 12. In a study of 2,260 U.S. volunteers ages 12 to 15, preliminary data showed there were no cases of COVID-19 among fully vaccinated adolescents compared to 18 among those given dummy shots, Pfizer reported.

The city of Seattle recently opened a vaccination appointment notification list for anyone in Tiers 1-4 of Phase 1A and Phase 1B. Preregistration is available for anyone 16 or older, residents who have not received a COVID-19 vaccination and anyone who lives or works in King County.

Anyone who signs up for the notification list will receive an email when an appointment becomes available at any of the city-run vaccination sites. The vaccination sites are located in North Seattle, Rainier Beach, West Seattle and the Lumen Field Event Center.

Originally posted here:

What Washington parents should know about COVID-19 vaccines for 16- and 17-year-olds - KING5.com

Page 555«..1020..554555556557..560570..»