Category: Corona Virus

Page 508«..1020..507508509510..520530..»

Texas veterans homes overseen by George P. Bush were often the deadliest places to be during COVID-19 pandemic – The Texas Tribune

July 24, 2021

About this story: The Texas Tribune and Houston Chronicle spent months investigating how Texas cared for veterans and their spouses during the coronavirus pandemic at the nine state-run veterans homes. Reporters reviewed hundreds of pages of inspection reports and internal emails, and interviewed more than a dozen experts, resident advocates and families.

Mary Kay Dieterich was encouraged last year when Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush promised to shake up the management of the El Paso nursing home where her father died of COVID-19.

She knew it wouldnt bring Eugene Forti, a World War II veteran, back to life. But as the top elected official in charge of all nine of the states nursing homes catering to veterans in Texas, Bush certainly had the power to hold the private management company accountable for what Dieterich saw as a botched response to the pandemic.

Yet, despite telling the for-profit operator of the Ambrosio Guillen Texas State Veterans Home that he was deeply concerned about the care it was providing in El Paso, Bushs promised shakeup, delivered to the local news outlet El Paso Matters, never came even as COVID deaths soared at the facility.

More than a quarter of its infected residents died, nearly double the average 13% death rate across El Paso Countys 21 nursing homes.

And its not the only one.

Nursing homes, which care for people who are already medically vulnerable, were ravaged by the pandemic. But Texas state-run veterans homes were often the deadliest places to be.

The nine state homes had more than double the death rate among COVID-19-infected residents compared with other nursing homes in the state, according to a Texas Tribune-Houston Chronicle analysis of state data from the pandemics start until June 2021.

The Houston Chronicle and The Texas Tribune spent months investigating how Texas cared for veterans and their spouses at the height of the coronavirus pandemic at the nine state-run veterans homes in Amarillo, Big Spring, Bonham, El Paso, Floresville, Houston, McAllen, Temple and Tyler. After reviewing hundreds of pages of inspection reports and internal emails, and interviewing more than a dozen experts, resident advocates and families, the Chronicle and the Tribune found:

Three of the states nine veterans homes including Ambrosio Guillen in El Paso had the highest death rate among all nursing homes in their county. Seven had a fatality rate of 25% or more, far higher than the statewide average of 11% across Texas nursing homes.

All told, nearly 570 veterans home residents tested positive for COVID-19 in Texas and nearly a quarter of them, 134, died.

Veterans home residents are typically male and older than people in other nursing homes, and many have chronic conditions that can make them more susceptible to severe infection, Bushs agency and experts said. The homes are often larger facilities, which studies have shown were at greater risk of outbreaks.

But Texas nine veterans homes are also among about 23% nationwide that are managed by private contractors rather than the state, which residents advocates and experts said could expose them to cost-cutting by for-profit companies.

After the Tribune-Chronicle findings were shared with Bushs office two weeks ago, he vowed to take action to improve care by not renewing the operators contracts and starting over from scratch.

Two for-profit companies manage Texas nine state homes under the auspices of the Veterans Land Board. The board, which oversees programs for veterans, is headed by Bush and housed within the General Land Office. A representative of Bushs agency is on-site in each home and has sweeping access to attend meetings, hear complaints, protect the interests of the board and advocate for residents rights, according to the homes contracts.

Three of the homes are run by Texas VSI and accounted for 40% of the fatalities among sick veterans home residents.

The other contractor, Touchstone Communities, oversees the states other six veterans homes including one in Floresville where state inspectors found residents were in immediate jeopardy and failures that constituted actual harm, according to regulatory records from May 2020.

After inspectors documented multiple violations, the Frank M. Tejeda Texas State Veterans Home was hit with state and federal fines totaling nearly $300,000 the largest by far of the veterans homes in Texas, health authorities say. It had the most coronavirus cases and second-highest death toll of the five nursing homes in Wilson County, where Floresville is the county seat. (The home with the highest number of deaths had a dedicated COVID-19 ward that took in patients from other facilities and hospitals, its administrator said).

A second inspection in February of this year uncovered a new infection control violation at Frank Tejeda and resulted in another $30,000 in fines, federal records show.

Floresville Mayor Cecelia Gonzalez-Dippel blamed the Bush-led Veterans Land Board for failing to follow up on complaints and to ensure that residents received proper treatment.

It makes me angry, you know. Yes, angry at COVID. But also angry at how did this happen? Gonzalez-Dippel said in a January interview. I cant go and investigate [the veterans home] myself. Im leaning on the Land [Board] to do everything they can to take care of all of the residents.

On July 8, one day after the Tribune and the Chronicle shared its analysis with the agency, Bush now running for Texas attorney general decided to end his agencys relationship with the for-profit operators of the homes and asked his staff to conduct a nationwide search to find replacements with a proven track record at infection control procedures, General Land Office spokesperson Rachel Jones said.

The care our veterans receive is of utmost importance to the Veterans Land Board, and we take every charge levied by family members, residents, and public health authorities seriously, Jones said.

Texas VSI and Touchstone referred questions to Bushs agency.

The land board, citing incomplete federal data, said the homes operated by San Antonio-based Touchstone had a comparable death rate with other skilled nursing facilities nationwide. The Tribune-Chronicle analysis did not use the federal data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services because it does not include all COVID-19 cases and deaths before late May 2020 and therefore doesnt capture more than two dozen cases and 14 deaths at state veterans homes captured by state data.

Touchstone has managed every veterans home in the state at some point, Jones said.

Texas VSI is affiliated with South Carolina-based HMR Veterans Services, which manages at least nine veterans facilities across four states. In 2018, inspectors found an HMR-operated veterans home in South Carolina failed to thoroughly investigate claims of abuse and injuries and encouraged employees to be misleading in reports, according to The Greenville News.

The Land Board has previously tried to replace the operators without success, but as COVID-19 infection rates have dropped, the agency is now able to review practices and procedures and better prepare all homes for future pandemics, Jones said.

In the meantime, inspectors have continued to find problems. A second Touchstone-operated facility, the Richard A. Anderson Texas State Veterans Home in Houston, was hit with another immediate jeopardy finding a severe deficiency meaning at least one resident is at risk of harm or death when an 81-year-old veteran was found outside, unsupervised, crawling on the ground in his undergarments in May of this year, according to federal records obtained by the Tribune-Chronicle.

After the Tribune-Chronicle sent Bushs agency the federal records, Jones said the agency had already moved to terminate Touchstones contract to oversee the home, which opened at the end of 2019. Bush told agency staff to do so after the incident happened but before the immediate jeopardy finding was issued, she said.

The home received a $69,225 fine, according to federal health officials.

The disproportionate death toll in Texas veterans homes follows a national trend: According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, the facilities were among the hardest hit during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.

The heavily male and elderly population inside veterans homes may explain some of the discrepancy, since men are more likely to die from COVID-19 than women. But Texas nine homes account for about a quarter of the privately run state veterans facilities in the United States, and experts and residents' advocates say for-profit nursing homes tend to have lower staffing levels and perform worse than nonprofit or government-run facilities.

Studies for decades have documented that not-for-profit and public facilities have more staff, they spend more money on staff, they spend more money on supplies, on food, things like that, and they generally have better care, said Toby Edelman, senior policy attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy, a national nonprofit.

Texas nursing homes overall have some of the lowest nursing hours per resident nationwide, behind all but three U.S. states, and five of Texas nine veterans homes fall beneath even the state average, according to federal data. At the end of 2020, six of Texas veterans homes were reporting that residents received less time with a nurse each day than the average across nursing homes nationwide.

The numbers are cause for serious concern, said Richard Mollot, head of the Long Term Care Community Coalition, an advocacy group based in New York.

Its particularly disheartening to see government officials fail to ensure proper care for a population that gave so much to keep Americans safe, he said.

Veterans homes are set up to care for people who have sacrificed or dedicated at least a part of their lives to protecting our country, he said. Weve kind of stepped back, as a country, from protecting them just when they needed it most.

COVID-19 outbreaks in veterans homes nationwide have highlighted what critics describe as a porous regulatory structure, where oversight is fragmented among states and federal agencies as evidenced by the title of a July 2020 congressional hearing: Whos in charge?

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs gives states funding to help operate each home and inspects each facility annually. But the nonpartisan U.S. Government Accountability Office criticized those inspections as lax and said the VA did not post information about the quality of the homes on its website. VA officials have now done so and emphasize the homes are owned, operated and managed by the states.

More than half of the veterans homes, including all those in Texas, are subject to extra scrutiny from federal health authorities because they receive Medicaid or Medicare payments.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is the primary regulator for nursing homes in the U.S., but most of the health agencys inspections were paused during the pandemic. The surveys that did occur were focused on infection control or responding to serious complaints, leaving a gap in oversight, said Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus of social behavioral sciences in the University of California, San Franciscos nursing school and an expert on nursing homes.

Following federal guidance, nursing homes halted visitation to forestall the spread of the virus. The state ombudsmans office, an independent advocate for nursing home residents rights, also stopped making in-person visits because of the pandemic.

I think that nursing homes knew they didnt have the oversight and they could pretty much do what they wanted, Harrington said. So they took advantage of it. And as a result, I think there were a lot of unnecessary infections and deaths.

A Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services spokesperson noted that federal authorities increased penalties for noncompliance with infection control, issued regulatory waivers to help nursing homes obtain staff quickly, and provided funding for facilities to buy tablets and other communication devices to help residents better communicate during the pandemic.

But Melissa Jackson, president of the National Association of State Veterans Homes and administrator of Vermonts state-run veterans home, said critics unfairly villainized the homes during a pandemic that the entire country was unprepared for. Administrators scrambled to find protective equipment that was initially in short supply and had to hire contract staff to help when their employees had to quarantine.

The first positive case at her states veterans home was the worst day of her career, she said. She at times felt helpless or went home and cried.

I still havent done that sigh of relief. You go into long-term care in any setting but specifically in the setting when youre caring for Americas heroes and you do everything you can to keep them safe, she said. Then you have this outside virus and all of the system failures that came down.

Half a dozen experts interviewed by the Tribune-Chronicle said the pandemic laid bare long-standing issues in long-term care including chronic understaffing and high employee turnover.

Nursing homes often have more than one resident in each room, which can make it difficult to separate residents to stem the viruss spread. Many of their employees are front-line workers who receive low wages, sometimes lack paid sick leave and work in multiple facilities providing hands-on care in close quarters.

You couple that with a virus that can be asymptomatically spread and thats airborne, and thats going to pose a risk pretty much no matter what nursing homes do, said R. Tamara Konetzka, a health economist at the University of Chicago, who co-authored several studies about nursing homes during the pandemic.

Studies have found that the prevalence of the virus in the surrounding community and the size of the nursing home largely determined how hard facilities were hit: Larger facilities in COVID-19 hot spots were more likely to have infections. Having more staff helped to blunt an outbreak once the virus entered a nursing home, according to one study.

Inspection records from the states health commission paint a chaotic picture of life inside several of the state veterans homes as the pandemic took hold.

In the spring of 2020, state inspectors found potentially life-threatening deficiencies at the Frank Tejeda home in Floresville, reporting that the facility then home to some 140 residents hadnt put in place recommendations from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prepare for COVID-19, and failed to prevent transmission of the virus to more than a dozen residents and nine staff members.

Residents with no symptoms were not separated from those who tested positive. Employees cared for both infected and well residents, sometimes while not wearing proper personal protective equipment. Some of the residents care plans didnt say they were infected or should be isolated.

I cant believe they have both positive and negative [residents] on the same hall way, one licensed vocational nurse told the state inspectors, according to the report. We are trying to be careful not to cross contaminate, but its going to [happen]. Especially with staff coming in and out of the resident rooms.

The director of nursing told the inspectors that residents werent separated because employees were waiting for coronavirus test results to come back and figured those not yet sick were already contaminated. Another employee said it was difficult to separate residents because there was not enough staff working overnight to care for both the sick and healthy groups.

Touchstone is disputing the state report in administrative proceedings, and Bushs office said the contractor is asking federal authorities to remove deficiencies they documented in a published report including alleged failures in infection control and PPE use. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission said it could not discuss the related state case due to the active litigation.

Workers at the home also said they had to reuse masks and were told they did not need goggles or face shields.

One nurse would take her mask home, spray it with disinfectant and let it air dry. Another employee said she was given a loose-fitting N-95 and wore it while working in each unit, including the one housing infected residents, the inspection report said. Others wore just surgical masks while caring for patients with the coronavirus rather than the recommended N-95.

The findings anger but dont surprise Jeanette Christensen, whose 64-year-old husband has been housed at the Floresville home since 2019. She said getting information from Touchstone during the pandemic was like pulling teeth.

In one email she sent to Touchstone and the land office in January, she said a message the operator sent notifying families about new cases came across as a slap in the face because it included only a link that led to a webpage with no information about the Frank Tejeda home.

This is NOT transparency in any possible way, shape, or form. In fact, if I may be so bold as to speak truth, it has a tendency to feel more deceiving than clarifying, she wrote to the company.

Before the coronavirus, she said, Touchstone had a revolving door of workers at the home and failed to help her husband with daily tasks like regularly brushing his teeth and did not consistently change a patch that helps control symptoms of his dementia.

The corporation is always about the bottom line, she said.

Beyond the Frank Tejeda facility, at least six other Texas veterans homes were cited for health or regulatory failures since the pandemic began, including deficiencies unrelated to the pandemic like poor continence care and unpalatable foods (pureed sausage gravy grainy and salty, according to a March 2021 state inspection of the Lamun-Lusk-Sanchez Texas State Veterans Home). Four, including Frank Tejeda, received fines for the lapses; another faces a potential fine.

Jones, the General Land Office spokesperson, said the land board was not made aware of the problems at the Frank Tejeda home until after state inspectors issued their warning to the company, and was not told about any protective equipment shortages by Touchstone. She faulted Touchstone for the failure of not ensuring staff wore available protective equipment and said the agency helped obtain COVID-19 test kits for each home.

Jones noted the contractors are in charge of staffing, but she did not respond to questions about why the land boards on-site representative did not alert the agency to problems at Frank Tejeda and other homes.

Local officials and distraught loved ones say Bushs land board and the veterans home operators left them blind to the risks posed by COVID-19 and with little information about what was happening inside the homes as the pandemic took hold.

Floresvilles mayor, Gonzalez-Dippel, said the situation there has been very, very concerning since day one, since the first reported case and the first reported death. She said she was not impressed with the land board after it provided her with incorrect information that residents would receive coronavirus tests in a set time frame, which didnt happen in the pandemics early days.

Gonzalez-Dippel said Touchstone Communities never returned her calls.

She learned of new cases at the home through information the Veterans Land Board released to San Antonio media outlets. Family members of residents said they didnt know how their loved one was doing or whether they had tested positive for the virus, Gonzalez-Dippel said.

In the spring of 2020, Gonzalez-Dippel alerted state health officials to possible problems in the home after hearing there wasnt enough protective equipment and that it was being improperly stored. She said no one told her that the inspection in May 2020 found that residents were in immediate jeopardy and resulted in fines totaling $281,500.

It makes me furious, Gonzalez-Dippel said after being told last month of the violations and the fines. These people deserve so much more than what they got.

Jones said the agency stayed in regular contact with Gonzalez-Dippel throughout the pandemic.

At Ambrosio Guillen in El Paso, Mary Kay Dieterich said she and her brother Guy Forti could get almost no information about their ailing father despite promises from management that they would be kept in the loop.

Id have to really give them a poor, poor grade for communication. And especially during such a stressful time, Dieterich said. We were getting no information.

Forti was admitted to a nearby medical center last May with chest pains, a fever and a dry cough. He tested positive for the coronavirus and was moved to a COVID-19 wing on the seventh floor of the hospital, where his attending physician called Fortis son and daughter and promised to give daily updates.

Before that, theyd received two text messages similar to Amber Alerts saying the facility was locking down to prevent spreading the new coronavirus and that visitors were no longer allowed, even at the windows.

An employee at the veterans home also had declined to tell Fortis son how many cases the facility had.

Those numbers were protected by law and could not be revealed, Dieterich said her brother Guy was told by phone around the time his father tested positive.

Yet the for-profit contractor was providing regular updates to the General Land Office, many of them obtained this summer by the Tribune and the Chronicle. In one email, sent just weeks after the promised leadership shake-up that never came, a Texas VSI representative told Bushs office that 14 new residents and nine staff members had been diagnosed with COVID-19.

El Paso test results were horrifying but this was no Halloween trick, the employee wrote. 4 residents are hospitalized. Current numbers are 44 positive residents and 19 positive staff members.

In later calls with Texas VSI officials, Dieterich said she was told the contractor didnt have the staff or funding to have employees wait to receive negative test results before starting to work.

Jones called the email update by the VSI representative disrespectful and unprofessional in every sense and said the state could release medical information only to a residents responsible party in Fortis case, his son Guy. She also said the homes together sent thousands of mass messages during the pandemic.

Dwight Henry, a 77-year-old resident of the El Paso home, was hospitalized with COVID-19 for 14 days, four in the intensive care unit, around the time his friend Forti was also in the hospital, he said.

He learned of Fortis death while he was there. Two other residents who lived across the hall from him also died, he said.

We lost a lot of them, he said.

Dieterich said her father had improved in the hospital after receiving a convalescent plasma treatment. But he took a sudden turn for the worse three days after he was returned to the veterans home.

He stopped eating and drinking. He wasnt responding verbally. The next day, he was dead.

Dieterich said in a June 2020 email that her dad was a war hero, a husband of 68 years to a woman he adored, and a dad that worked his fingers to the bone supporting his family.

She believes her dads death was 100% preventable and said she was extremely disappointed that Bush did not follow through on his promise to shake up the leadership of the Texas VSI team that oversees the El Paso facility.

He was demanding these leadership changes and nothing happened. Nothing, Dieterich said. George P. Bush certainly needs to be held accountable.

Texas Tribune Deputy Data Visuals Editor Chris Essig contributed to this story.

Read this article:

Texas veterans homes overseen by George P. Bush were often the deadliest places to be during COVID-19 pandemic - The Texas Tribune

Public Health Officials Announce 7,983 New Cases of Coronavirus Disease Over the Past Week | IDPH – IDPH

July 24, 2021

73% of Illinois adults have received at least one vaccine dose and more than 58% are fully vaccinated

SPRINGFIELD The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) today reported 7,983 new confirmed and probable cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Illinois, including 47 additional deaths since reporting last Friday, July16, 2021. More than 73% of Illinois adults have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose and more than 58% of Illinois adults are fully vaccinated, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Currently, IDPH is reporting a total of 1,407,929 cases, including 23,401 deaths, in 102 counties in Illinois. The age of cases ranges from younger than one to older than 100 years. Since reporting on Friday, July 16, 2021, laboratories have reported 241,150 specimens for a total of 26,534,129. As of last night, 670 individuals in Illinois were reported to be in the hospital with COVID-19. Of those, 135 patients were in the ICU and 44 patients with COVID-19 were on ventilators.

The preliminary seven-day statewide positivity for cases as a percent of total test from July 16-22, 2021 is 3.3%. The preliminary seven-day statewide test positivity from July 16-22, 2021 is 3.5%.

A total of 13,056,857 vaccines have been administered in Illinois as of last midnight. The seven-day rolling average of vaccines administered daily is 19,928 doses. Since reporting on Friday, July 16, 2021, 139,495 doses were reported administered in Illinois.

*All data are provisional and will change. Additional information and COVID-19 data can be found at http://www.dph.illinois.gov/covid19.

Continue reading here:

Public Health Officials Announce 7,983 New Cases of Coronavirus Disease Over the Past Week | IDPH - IDPH

Coronavirus infection rates in these South Shore communities are among highest in NYC – SILive.com

July 24, 2021

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. The number of new confirmed coronavirus (COVID-19) cases in the borough continued to rise, averaging nearly 20 more per day over the past week compared to the week before.

Coronavirus hospitalizations here jumped by nearly 50% over the last seven days, although they were still lower than the total two weeks ago.

At the same time, the disease has claimed the lives of three more borough residents since July 16, city Health Department data shows.

As of 1 p.m. Friday, 63,809 confirmed coronavirus cases have been recorded in the borough since the pandemic struck about 17 months ago, according to the most recent data available.

That number marks an increase of 72 from Thursdays total of 63,737 cases.

It is also 396 higher than last Fridays posted tally of 63,413 or about 57 new cases daily during the past week.

Staten Island had averaged around 37 new coronavirus cases per day between July 9 and July 15. Previously, there had been about 19 new cases daily during the month of June.

In fact, four Staten Island ZIP codes COVID-19 infection rates were among the highest in the city for the seven-day period between July 14 and July 20, according to the most recent data available for those numbers, per the Health Departments web site.

ZIP code 10312, which includes Annadale, Arden Heights, Eltingville, Greenridge and Huguenot, had a rate of 4.62% for those tested.

The positivity rate in ZIP code 10308, which contains Great Kills, was 4.49%.

Just behind at 4.45 percent were ZIP codes 10307 (Tottenville) and 10309, which includes Charleston, Pleasant Plains, Princes Bay, Rossville and Woodrow.

In contrast, ZIP code 10310, which includes Port Richmond, Randall Manor and West Brighton, has the lowest seven-day positivity rate on the Island at 1.24%.

All data is preliminary, subject to change and can reflect lags in collection according to the Health Department.

*** CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS IN NEW YORK ***

Also, as of Friday afternoon, 1,850 Staten Islanders are believed to have died from complications related to the coronavirus.

That total represents an increase of three from July 16.

The fatalities include 1,637 borough residents with confirmed COVID-19 cases, up three from the figure posted a week ago.

In addition, 213 deaths were in the probable category, the same number as last Friday.

A death is classified as probable if the decedent was a city resident who had no known positive laboratory test for the coronavirus, but the death certificate lists COVID-19 or an equivalent as a cause of death.

According to city Health Department data, the vast majority of confirmed coronavirus deaths in the five boroughs occurred in individuals with underlying medical issues.

Those conditions can include lung disease, asthma, heart disease, a weakened immune system, obesity, diabetes, kidney disease, liver disease and cancer.

Meanwhile, 22 coronavirus in-patients were being treated in the boroughs two hospital systems on Friday. That count was up two from Thursday and marked an increase of seven from July 16s tally of 15 patients.

However, Fridays total was two less than the number two weeks ago on July 9, which was 24.

COVID-19 hospitalizations are just a fraction of what they had been.

From the beginning of the year until the end of April, Staten Islands coronavirus patient count had been in the triple-digits.

COVID-19 hospitalizations peaked on Jan. 18 at 302 patients.

Since then, those numbers have fallen, increased slightly, then dropped dramatically.

They have fluctuated in recent weeks.

On Friday, Staten Island University Hospital (SIUH) was treating 18 patients, said Jillian OHara, a spokeswoman. That total was up six from a week ago.

Richmond University Medical Center was caring for four patients, a boost of one from July 16, Alex Lutz, a spokesman, said.

In other data, 795,506 confirmed coronavirus cases have been reported citywide as of Friday afternoon.

That tally is 3,901 higher than July 16s total of 791,605 cases, averaging to about 557 per day over the past week.

As for suspected coronavirus deaths across the five boroughs, that count has reached 33,502.

The fatalities consist of 28,399 individuals who were confirmed coronavirus cases.

There were 5,103 others whose deaths were deemed as probable COVID-19 cases.

With respect to testing, the data shows 13,400 of every 100,000 Staten Islanders checked or more than 1 in 8 have received positive results for the coronavirus, according to 2018 Census data projections and the Health Departments Friday afternoon tally.

Staten Islands infection rate is the highest, per capita, among the five boroughs.

The Bronxs infection rate is second highest.

In that borough, 10,684 residents per 100,000 have tested positive. The Bronx has had 153,003 confirmed cases.

Queens has the third-highest rate of confirmed coronavirus cases in the city with 10,190 residents per 100,000 testing positive. There have been 232,221 cases in that borough, the second-most populous.

Brooklyn, the borough with the largest population, has the fourth-lowest rate of infection per 100,000 residents 9,110.

However, Brooklyns 235,304 cases are the most among the five boroughs.

Manhattan has the lowest infection rate in the city with 6,823 per 100,000 residents testing positive of those who were examined.

There have been 111,122 positive cases in Manhattan, the data said.

Excerpt from:

Coronavirus infection rates in these South Shore communities are among highest in NYC - SILive.com

Olympics 2021 COVID-19 tracker: Everyone who has tested positive for coronavirus at the Games – CBS Sports

July 24, 2021

After years of anticipation, plus one more due to a global pandemic, the Tokyo Olympics have arrived at long last. But even with a postponement from 2020, the mood around the Olympics is far from calm.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, an atmosphere of uncertainty has gripped the Games, particularly as athletes in Tokyo and other participants have tested positive for the virus.

Here is a list of all those so far who have tested positive for COVID-19, leading to the alteration of their Olympic dreams or the end of them altogether.

Go here to see the original:

Olympics 2021 COVID-19 tracker: Everyone who has tested positive for coronavirus at the Games - CBS Sports

Covid-19 vaccines are effective at preventing severe disease, experts say, as rising cases threaten unvaccinated – CNN

July 24, 2021

CNN

With Covid-19 cases rising and the Delta variant gaining increased prevalence in the United States, health experts are reiterating that vaccines are effective in the ways that matter most: preventing severe disease, hospitalization and death.

Speaking to CNNs Jim Acosta on Saturday, Dr. Anthony Fauci said the vaccines are shown to be highly effective in preventing symptomatic, clinically apparent disease.

When you start seeing whats called breakthrough infections, if you look carefully at them, the overwhelming majority of those are people who either have no symptoms or only very mild symptoms, Fauci said. So the vaccines are still very, very effective in preventing severe disease.

The Delta variant has pretty much taken over in the US, said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Childrens Hospital in Philadelphia and a member of the US Food and Drug Administrations vaccine advisory committee. But its clear the vaccines work against the Delta variant, too, he said.

Despite the rise of the Delta variant, still 97% of people who are hospitalized or killed by this virus are unvaccinated, Offit said. If the Delta variant were escaping, essentially, immunity induced by vaccination, then you should have seen a rise in people who are vaccinated, but nonetheless were still hospitalized and killed. And that hasnt happened.

Yet the pace of inoculations is slowing, with less than half of the US population 48.5%, per the latest data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fully vaccinated. And its the communities with lower vaccination rates that are at risk.

Among those states that have fully vaccinated less than half of their residents, the average Covid-19 case rate was 11 new cases per 100,000 people last week, compared to 4 per 100,000 among states that have fully vaccinated more than half of their residents, according to a CNN analysis of data from Johns Hopkins University.

If you are unvaccinated, the risk is incredibly high and maybe in some areas higher than its ever been, said Dr. Craig Spencer, director of global health in emergency medicine at Columbia University Medical Center, adding people are acting a little more carefree and lackadaisical, raising the chance of exposure.

Indeed, the number of people traveling by air set a pandemic-era record Friday, with nearly 2.2 million people screened at US airports, a spokesperson for the Transportation Security Administration said, adding an admonition: #MaskUp.

In the meantime, vaccinated people should continue to be smart, but are very unlikely to get sick, be hospitalized or die of Covid-19, Spencer said.

Canada and the US were neck and neck early Saturday afternoon in the percentage of fully vaccinated people, according to data from the countries governments. So far, 18,286,671 Canadians, or 48.65%, have been fully vaccinated, according to data from Johns Hopkins University, compared with 160,994,035, or 48.5%, of Americans, according to the CDC data.

In the US, officials are increasingly focused on increasing vaccination rates among younger people.

Young people sometimes feel that theyre invulnerable. They need a little, I would say a gentle push not forcing or threatening, but to get them to understand why its important for their own safety, Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN on Saturday. Because as were getting more and more infections with the Delta variant were seeing more and more young people who are getting seriously ill.

To that end, Fauci teamed up with 18-year-old pop star Olivia Rodrigo this week, appearing in a video released by the White House that encourages young people to get vaccinated.

The sooner all of us get vaccinated, the sooner we can, like, hang out with our friends and sing songs and all of the fun things, Rodrigo said.

Alabama health officials Friday announced a TikTok contest aimed at increasing Covid-19 vaccination rates among people between the ages of 13 and 29. Contestants are asked to submit a video that shows them getting vaccinated and a message that shares why they chose to do so. Four winners will be chosen to receive a $250 Visa gift card, officials said.

Darrell Hudson, principal of A.H. Parker High School in Birmingham, Alabama, told CNN school officials dont know how many of their students are vaccinated, and some are still a little concerned about taking the vaccine and whats in the vaccine. But he said hes hopeful students will get the shot, along with their families, so they can safely return to the classroom August 2.

We dont want any child coming to our campus, taking the virus back home to parents, to grandparents, to aunties and to their relatives, Hudson said.

As for vaccines for even younger children, studies continue, Fauci told CNN.

Thus far, things look good, but the final decision is going to be up to the FDA, Fauci said. And I would imagine that likely will not happen until we get well into the winter, towards the end of this year.

Additionally, Fauci said he would be astounded if the Covid-19 vaccine by Pfizer/BioNTech didnt receive full FDA approval for people 16 and older by the end of August (each vaccine available in the US has been authorized for emergency use, but they have yet to be fully approved). The companies announced Friday the FDA had granted priority review designation to their application for approval for their vaccine.

But even between now and then, people should realize that the data of the efficacy and real-world effectiveness of these vaccines is really extraordinary not only in the United States, but in multiple countries throughout the world, Fauci said.

Local officials continue to sound the alarm about the increase in cases, particularly among those unvaccinated. Twenty states have fully vaccinated more than half of their residents, according to the CDC, but health care facility resources are being stretched in states with fewer vaccinations.

Only a fourth of residents in Mobile County, Alabama, are fully vaccinated, Commissioner Merceria Ludgood said at a news conference Friday. And now the county is seeing a massive increase in hospitalizations, according to Dr. Laura Cepeda, chief medical officer of the Mobile County Health Department, who said theres been a 400% increase in hospitalizations in the past month.

Mayor Sandy Stimpson encouraged those who have gotten the shots to talk with their loved ones and neighbors.

Today, we have sports heroes, we have rock stars, we have movie stars, coaches encouraging people all across this country to get vaccinated, Stimpson said. But if youve been vaccinated, dont underestimate your ability to reach out to someone and encourage them to do it. You may be that person to convince them that this is the right thing to do.

Nathan Papes/Springfield News-Leader/Imagn

People line up for the vaccine at Mother's Brewing Company in Springfield, Missouri, on June 22, 2021.

Katie Towns, acting director of the Springfield-Greene County Health Department in Missouri, told CNN Friday the department is requesting an alternative care site and staff from the state to address the growing number of Covid-19 cases and hospitalizations, saying, Its at a level that weve not seen before,

Most striking is the demographic and age, she said of Covid-19 patients, almost all of whom are unvaccinated. The illness has really shifted from being an older population to being ages 20, 30, 40 years old in the hospital and needing ICU care and oxygen.

And hospitals and health officials are projecting an increase in numbers following the Fourth of July holiday.

I dont think weve seen the worst of it, Towns said.

But even in areas with higher rates of vaccination, officials are beginning to reinstitute safety protocols such as mask mandates to try to curb the spread.

Health authorities in the San Francisco Bay Area on Friday announced they are recommending everyone wear masks indoors.

And Los Angeles County will reinstate its indoor mask mandate Saturday night for both vaccinated and unvaccinated people. The countys public health department reported 1,827 new cases Saturday, a fourfold increase in the number of cases reported on July 4.

George Metsos, owner of Patys Restaurant in Los Angeles, told CNN the mask mandates have been confusing, and the changing guidance doesnt help.

They say follow the science. Well, they said dont wear masks if youre vaccinated. Now put the mask on if youre vaccinated, Metsos said. I need to protect my customers, I need to protect my employees and I have to follow the rules, but Im very in touch with the American public: Theyre very frustrated.

Amid growing concern, local authorities do have the discretion of going that extra mile or going the extra step it takes to make sure that the spread of this virus is really contained, Fauci told NBCs Nightly News with Lester Holt. And they do that by saying that everyone should wear a mask.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story included incorrect information about the number and percentage of Canadians fully vaccinated for Covid-19.

CNNs Lauren Mascarenhas, Jen Christensen, Jacqueline Howard, Laine Mackey, Deidre McPhillips, Leyla Santiago and Sara Weisfeldt contributed to this report.

The rest is here:

Covid-19 vaccines are effective at preventing severe disease, experts say, as rising cases threaten unvaccinated - CNN

Coronavirus Roundup: Concerns About the Delta Variant Rise; Administration Will ‘Continue to Follow the Science’ for Agency Reentry Plans -…

July 24, 2021

Monday was the deadline for agencies to submit their back to work plans to the Office of Management and Budget, as Government Executive previously reported. When asked for any updates on the plans and/or changes in planning due to the spread of the Delta variant, which accounts for more than 83% of cases in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a senior administration official said on Thursday: Agencies are working through reentry plans, but we dont have anything new to share at this time. We will continue to follow the science and listen to doctors and adhere to CDC guidelines.

OMB said earlier this week that timelines vary agency by agency, based on each organizations unique mission and organizational considerations. Here are some of the other recent headlines you might have missed.

With concerns of the Delta variant spreading, Jeff Zients, White House coronavirus response coordinator, spoke during a briefing on Thursday about what the federal government is doing to help communities. Last week, we announced $400 million in American Rescue Plan funding for 1,540 small rural hospitals for COVID-19 to increase testing capacity in rural America, he said. And today...we're making an additional $1.6 billion investment in American Rescue Plan funding to bolster testing and mitigation measures in high-risk congregate settings, including homeless shelters, mental health and substance abuse treatment centers, domestic violence shelters, and prison systems.

Zients added that the administration's coronavirus surge response teams are working with governors and local public health officials and providing them with federal resources; the administration is providing the CDC technical expertise, including on genetic sequencing, data analysis, and outbreak response to Missouri, Illinois and Colorado and [the Federal Emergency Management Agency] will be deploying mobile vaccination clinics in North Carolina. Lastly, he pointed out that on Thursday Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra was going to Nevada where federal resources and 100 personnel from HHS and FEMA were sent to support local public health efforts.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during the briefing that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is very effective and right now there isnt any data to show that individuals who received that vaccine need a booster shot.

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that White House and CDC officials talked about recommending vaccinated people wear masks in certain settings due to the spread of the Delta variant. CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky was asked during the briefing on Thursday if the CDC is considering changing its mask guidance and she did not give adirect answer. We are always looking at the data as the data comes in, Walensky said. We have always said that communitieslocal communities have to look at what is going on locally, as we have [a] very heterogeneous country right now. In areas that have a high amount of disease and low amounts of vaccination, that, you knowif you're unvaccinated, you should absolutely be wearing a mask.

During a briefing on Thursday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki reiterated that there has not been a change in mask guidance. When pressed to confirm whether or not White House officials were a part of these discussions, she said the White House is regularly in touch and [we] have regular meetings with our public health officials, including the CDC, about how to continue to address the virus, which shouldn't surprise anyone. Also, the [Washington Post] report on it was a little breathless about what it implied was happening when the CDC director said that's not a decision that's been made.

Psaki was also asked during the briefing if there have been any talks about the White House promoting businesses choosing to verify vaccinated status for attending concerts or dining indoors or any discussion about changing its position on the matter? Our position has not changed, nor do I anticipate it would, on guidance coming from the federal government, Psaki replied. It is also entirely appropriate for private-sector entities and universities and hospitals to make decisions about how to keep their community safe.

The CDCs advisory committee on immunization practices agreed during a meeting on Thursday that the benefits outweigh the risks of Johnson &Johnsons vaccine after reports of rare side effects, Politico reported. But there was one caveat: Two of the panels 15 members suggested that those administering the vaccine ensure patients are aware of its risks, said the report. The panel also punted on booster shots. Whether immunocompromised people should get COVID-19 booster shots is a decision the committee is leaving up to the [Food and Drug Administration].

The Commerce Department announced on Thursday that $3 billion in funds from the American Rescue Plan will go to economic development in communities nationwide, which is the largest economic development initiative from the department in decades. With an emphasis on equity, [the Economic Development Administrations] investments made possible by the American Rescue Plan will directly benefit communities that have been denied full access to economic prosperity and who have been disproportionately impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, said Secretary Gina Raimondo, in a statement. We will work with local communities across the country on innovative new approaches to ensure that we can increase American competitiveness by strengthening our workforce, businesses and communities and build back better in regions across the country.

Upcoming: White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki will give a briefing at 12:30 p.m.

Help us understand the situation better. Are you a federal employee, contractor or military member with information, concerns, etc. about how your agency is handling the coronavirus? Email us at newstips@govexec.com.

Read the rest here:

Coronavirus Roundup: Concerns About the Delta Variant Rise; Administration Will 'Continue to Follow the Science' for Agency Reentry Plans -...

Coexisting with the Coronavirus – The New Yorker

July 22, 2021

In the spring of 1846, a Dutch physician named Peter Ludwig Panum arrived on the Faroe Islands, a volcanic chain about two hundred miles northwest of Scotland. He found the Faroes to be a harsh and unforgiving place. The islands eight thousand inhabitants, who were Danish subjects at that time, spent their days outdoors, buffeted by sea winds, fishing and tending sheep. The conditions, Panum wrote, were unlikely to prolong the lives of the inhabitants. And yet, despite the scarcity of medical care and a diet of wind-dried, sometimes rancid meat, the average Faroese life span was forty-five years, which matched or exceeded that in mainland Denmark. The islanders benefitted from a near-complete lack of infectious disease; many illnesses, including smallpox and scarlet fever, rarely reached them. Panum had arrived to study a measles epidemicthe first outbreak of that virus in the Faroe Islands in sixty-five years.

For the most part, the course of the outbreak was devastating and predictable. In six months time, more than three-quarters of the islands inhabitants were infected, and about a hundred people died. But the outbreak was also unusual in many ways. In mainland Europe, measles was typically a childhood infection. Few Faroese children died in the outbreak; instead, adults bore the brunt. Their mortality rates increased with every decade of life until about the age of sixty-five, and then dropped off. It turned out that those whod been infected during the islands last measles epidemic, in 1781, were still protected by the immunity that theyd acquired decades before. Of these aged people, Panum wrote, not one, as far as I could find out by careful inquiry, was attacked the second time.

Panums study remains a striking demonstration of a remarkable fact: the body remembers. It learns to recognize the pathogens it encounters, and, in some cases, it can hold on to those memories for decades, even a lifetime. Ancient civilizations knew about immune memory long before they understood it; Thucydides, in his account of the plague of Athens, wrote that the same man was never attacked twicenever at least fatally. Many of us draw our ideas about the immune system from stories like these. We think of immunity as a binary state: without it, were vulnerable; with it, were safe.

For many pathogens, however, including coronaviruses, immunity is less clear-cut. The coronavirus family includes SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, along with four seasonal coronavirusesHCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-NL63which together cause an estimated ten to thirty per cent of common colds. Today, these seasonal coronaviruses are the cause of common childhood infections, as measles was in Panums time. In sharp contrast to measles, though, adults are reinfected by seasonal coronaviruses every few years.

Much of what we know about these reinfections comes from the Common Cold Unit, a remarkable British research program whose studies of virus transmission and treatment involved more than eighteen thousand human volunteers over the course of forty-four years. In one of the units last studies, published in 1990, fourteen healthy volunteers were exposed to seasonal coronavirus 229E by means of a nasal wash. They returned, a year later, to receive a second, identical dose. Of the nine people who were successfully infected the first time, six were infected again in the second exposure. The five volunteers whod escaped the virus the first time were all infected, too. The fact of the reinfections might seem alarming, but the volunteers whod been reinfected had fewer symptoms and were less likely to transmit the virus to others. They werent completely immune, but they retained a degree of immunitylow enough to allow for reinfection, but high enough to render the virus less potent.

This murky portrait of coronavirus immunity will shape our future as the U.S. brings COVID-19 under control. After getting the virus, the vaccine, or both, at least a hundred and sixty million Americans have acquired some form of immunity. Still, it is likely that the virus itself is here to stay. I personally think that theres essentially zero chance that SARS-CoV-2 will be eradicated, Jesse Bloom, a virologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, told me. (Bloom advised my Ph.D. research on influenza evolution.) Most viruses, including the four seasonal coronaviruses, other common-cold viruses, and the flu, havent been eradicated; scientists describe them as endemic, a term derived from the Greek word ndmos, meaning in the people. Endemic viruses circulate constantly, typically at low levels, but with occasional, more severe outbreaks. We dont shut out these endemic viruses with quarantines and stay-at-home orders; we live with them.

What will it be like to live with endemic SARS-CoV-2? That depends on the strength of our immune memories. How vividly will our bodies remember the virus or vaccine? How will waning immunity and the rise of variantssuch as Delta, which is currently driving a spike in COVID cases around the worldaffect our vulnerability to reinfection? Were beginning to learn the answers to some of these questions, and to get a sense of the years to come.

On May 13, 2020, a fishing vessel left Seattle in search of hake. Before boarding, the ships hundred and twenty-two crew members were tested for the coronavirus, and also for antibodies against it, which indicate prior infection. Three crew members tested positive for antibodies before departure; everyone tested negative for the virus. But, while at sea, a member of the crew fell ill and tested positive. A ship at sea is an island, and the coronavirus spread rapidly. When the vessel returned to shore, after an eighteen-day voyage, a hundred and three crew members tested positive for the coronavirus. And yet none of the three crew members whod possessed antibodies before boarding were infected a second time. In October, 2020, when these results were reported in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, it wasnt yet clear whether antibodies that formed during an initial infection could protect against reinfection. The vessel had brought home reassuring news.

Antibodies arent always the first line in our immune defense. When our cells encounter a new virus, they first respond by means of the so-called innate immune system, which shuts down many incipient infections quickly, before they grow out of control. This initial response is nonspecific; for the most part, its the same for every pathogen, novel or familiar. Its only a few days later that the adaptive immune systemthe home of immune memoryshifts into gear. Part of that ramping up involves B cells, which make antibodies. As a matter of course, our bodies produce millions of B cells, each tuned, in a more or less random way, to make a different kind of antibody; these antibodies are so diverse that one will inevitably match whatever pathogen might infect us. During an infection, the B cells that happen to be well suited to the new invader receive a signal to multiply. The antibodies they produce circulate in the bloodstream, binding to virus particles and disabling them.

The fishing-vessel study confirmed that the antibody response inspired by an initial SARS-CoV-2 exposure could protect against subsequent infections for some period of time. Immune memory had taken root. Those B cells will, in many cases, persist through the rest of your life and keep cranking out antibodies, so your body will now remember whatever youve been exposed to, Bloom, who was one of the authors of the study, said. And yet there are degrees of immune memory. Antibodies against certain viruses, such as measles, mumps, rubella, and smallpox, persist at extraordinarily stable levels for many decades; its because of that persistence that the aged people in Panums study were able to resist disease a lifetime later. But not all antibody responses are so durable. In 2007, researchers published a study of workers at the Oregon National Primate Research Center. The workers blood is tested regularly for exposure to animal diseases. The researchers found that, although some antibody levels stayed high, others fell over time. Antibodies against tetanus and diphtheria, two bacterial toxins, fell to half their previous levels in ten to twenty years.

The gradual erosion of antibody levels in the blood can lower protection and render us vulnerable to reinfection. An important unanswered question about SARS-CoV-2, therefore, is how long our antibody responses will last. Long term, do your antibodies go to a stable plateau that persists for the rest of your life, or is it a downward-sloping line? Bloom asked. For SARS-CoV-2, specifically, its too early to know. But long-term studies of its relatives, the viruses that cause SARS and MERS, have found that antibody levels can decline detectably in the two or three years after an infection. Time may erode levels of COVID antibodies as well.

Decline is not disappearance. Even if antibody levels go down from their initial post-infection peak, they may remain high enough to prevent a viral exposure from becoming an infection, or to keep an infection from progressing into severe disease. Onboard the fishing vessel, two of the three protected crew members had only modest antibody levels. The virus still left them untouched.

Immune memory isnt inscribed in antibodies alone. There is a whole array of memory cells that are just waiting to get reactivated, Marion Pepper, an immunologist at the University of Washington, told me. In addition to the B cells that make antibodies, we possess T cellsmarauding defenders capable of destroying the bodys own cells if theyve been infected with a virus. Like antibodies, T cells come to circulate at lower levels over time. But both adaptive systems boot up faster upon reinfection. It takes five to seven days to mount an adaptive immune response when you first see a virus, Pepper said. But it can take as little as two to four hours when you see it again.

Last summer, Peppers lab conducted a detailed study of immunity in fifteen volunteers whod had mild COVID-19 infections three months earlier. The researchers looked for antibodies, but also for so-called memory B and T cellsscouts that live in our tissue and bloodstream, monitoring for the reappearance of specific pathogens from the past. When these memory cells recognize an old foe, they sound the alarm, speeding the multiplication of pathogen-specific B and T cells. Memory cells are little needles in a haystack, Pepper told me, but the researchers still found ones tuned to the coronavirus, even though their research subjects had experienced only mild symptoms. I have a lot of faith in the immune system, Pepper said.

The immune systems overlapping layers work together to strengthen its memory. But viruses arent static. As they accumulate mutations, their shapes shift, and they gradually become more difficult for the system to recognize. Survivors of the 1918 flu pandemic maintained strong antibody responses against that virus for almost ninety years. And yet adults still get the flu approximately once every five years, because the influenza viruss rapid evolution insures that each year brings new variants. On average, flu viruses acquire half a dozen mutations each year; many of these alter the proteins that allow the viruses to enter and exit host cells. Antibodies that once bound tightly to a virus may have a weaker grip on its evolved form; the virus might escape the notice of certain T cells that used to recognize it.

You can also ask the question for coronaviruses, Bloom said. How much of the ability to reinfect people might be driven by the virus changing? Growing evidence suggests how much viral evolution might make us vulnerable to coronavirus reinfection. Recently, researchers in Blooms lab analyzed blood samples collected from people in the nineteen-eighties and nineties; the samples contained antibodies for the version of seasonal coronavirus 229E that circulated back then. Those same antibodies failed to recognize the descendants of the virus that had evolved in the intervening years. Coronaviruses mutate more slowly than viruses like influenza and H.I.V., but, over the course of a decade or two, they can still change enough to evade our immune memory.

Today, we are grappling with several coronavirus variants that are more transmissibleand possibly more deadlythan the original strain of SARS-CoV-2. Antibodies created in response to the initial virus or the current vaccines bind more poorly to several of these variants, creating opportunities for reinfection. The city of Manaus, in the Brazilian Amazon, is a case that has given researchers some reason for concern. In early 2020, the coronavirus spread there virtually unchecked; by October, tests showed that about half of the citys inhabitants harbored antibodies, leading some scientists to declare that the area had reached herd immunity. But, in December, the city experienced a second coronavirus surge that was even more severe than the first, causing more hospitalizations and deaths than the initial wave.

Read more here:

Coexisting with the Coronavirus - The New Yorker

Sixth Texas Democrat in Washington, D.C., tests positive for COVID-19 – The Texas Tribune

July 22, 2021

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

State Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, has tested positive for the coronavirus, marking the sixth case among nearly 60 House Democrats who traveled to Washington, D.C., last week to prevent the passage of a GOP election bill at the Texas Legislature.

"Despite following CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] guidelines and being fully vaccinated, I tested positive for COVID-19 on Monday," Howard said in a statement Tuesday, noting that she was "basically asymptomatic except for some minor congestion."

Over the weekend, the Texas House Democratic Caucus said that five of its members had tested positive for the virus. The members who tested positive, including state Reps. Celia Israel, D-Austin, and Trey Martinez Fischer, D-San Antonio, have been fully vaccinated.

The caucus, which has said it plans to not identify lawmakers who test positive, has started additional precautionary measures, such as providing daily rapid tests.

News of Howard's positive test was first reported Tuesday by the Austin American-Statesman. The Dallas Morning News first reported news of a sixth case Monday night.

A small percentage of vaccine breakthrough cases, which involve a fully-vaccinated person testing positive for the virus, have been expected, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but they do not discount the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.

In her statement, Howard said she will continue to work virtually and urged people to continue to get vaccinated.

"The delta variant [of the coronavirus] seems to be much more contagious, even for those vaccinated, than initially thought," she said. "Vaccines work."

The caucus in recent days has met with Vice President Kamala Harris and other lawmakers on Capitol Hill in an effort to push Congress to pass federal voting laws, though the confirmed cases have prompted the delegation to make adjustments for how to continue having such conversations.

Harris has since tested negative for the virus, though others, including a White House official and staffer for U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have tested positive after the staff member helped the delegation around the Capitol last week, according to Axios.

At a news conference later Tuesday, state Rep. Chris Turner, who chairs the caucus, said the group likely would not be aware of the confirmed cases had members not been proactively testing for the virus.

"If we were not proactively testing, we probably would not even know about it," he said.

Turner also said there was not an update yet on a potential meeting with President Joe Biden or whether the confirmed cases had dimmed the caucus' chances of meeting with the president in-person.

"Obviously we would welcome the opportunity to visit with the president virtually," Turner said.

Original post:

Sixth Texas Democrat in Washington, D.C., tests positive for COVID-19 - The Texas Tribune

What Is A Breakthrough COVID Case, And How Big Is The Risk? : Shots – Health News – NPR

July 22, 2021

With new infections rising around the country due to the delta variant, reports of breakthrough cases among the fully vaccinated can be worrisome. Mario Tama/Getty Images hide caption

With new infections rising around the country due to the delta variant, reports of breakthrough cases among the fully vaccinated can be worrisome.

There have been a number of recent reports of fully vaccinated people testing positive for the coronavirus at the White House, Congress, the Olympics and Major League Baseball. And with the fast-spreading delta variant driving up infections, hospitalizations and deaths, a lot of people are wondering whether the vaccines are as protective as we thought.

But the current crop of vaccine breakthrough cases doesn't surprise or alarm public health experts. "I haven't seen any signals in the U.S. indicating that they are occurring at the levels that would give us concern that the [vaccine] effectiveness is going down," said Saad Omer, director of the Yale Institute for Global Health.

In all of these settings, from Capitol Hill to professional sports, nearly everyone is vaccinated, he points out, and people are subject to frequent, asymptomatic testing. "It is not surprising to see a substantial number of cases in the vaccinated when the vaccination rate is high," he said.

Still, people who've been vaccinated may rightly be asking: Are breakthrough cases becoming more common because of the delta variant? Could I get sick or get a family member sick?

Here's what to know about breakthrough cases in the context of delta, and what scientists are doing to track the vaccines' efficacy:

Bottom line: Don't panic. So far, research shows the current vaccines are holding up well against the delta variant. For instance, a June study from the U.K. found that the Pfizer vaccine is 96% effective against hospitalization from the delta variant after two doses.

If you do get infected (which is not likely but possible), the vaccine should help you keep from getting seriously sick. "Breakthrough infections, they tend to be mild they tend to be more like a cold," said Dr. Carlos del Rio, professor of medicine and infectious disease epidemiology at Emory University.

"Those mild breakthroughs, according to a New England Journal study three weeks ago, are accompanied by lower viral loads and less much less symptoms," added Dr. Monica Gandhi, infectious disease physician at the University of California, San Francisco. In particular, the study "showed that if you get a mild breakthrough with any variant, you have a 40% lower viral load in your nose after vaccination than you do if you had a natural infection," she said.

Severe cases among vaccinated people are possible, but extremely rare the vaccines dramatically reduce the risk of serious illness that leads to hospitalization or death. And 97% of those currently hospitalized with COVID-19 are unvaccinated, according to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

For context, as of July 12, out of 159 million fully vaccinated people, the CDC documented 5,492 cases of fully vaccinated people who were hospitalized or died from COVID-19, and 75% of them were over age 65. It's not clear how many of these breakthrough infections were caused by the delta variant, but that's now by far the dominant variant in circulation.

The chances of getting seriously ill after being vaccinated are higher for those with certain health conditions that affect the immune system. Dr. Marc Boom, president and CEO of Houston Methodist, said that at his hospital, 90% of the patients with COVID-19 are unvaccinated. The small percentage of vaccinated patients who do end up hospitalized, he said, "have underlying significant health risks like cancer, like [organ] transplants that probably prevented them from mounting a full immune response to the vaccine."

"I think we are misusing the term breakthrough," said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. "If someone who is fully vaccinated is subsequently hospitalized or killed by the virus, that's a breakthrough case." He said he wouldn't call an "asymptomatic or relatively mild case" a "breakthrough case."

What matters, he said, is "the vaccine is still doing what it is designed to do keep people out of the hospital and out of the morgue."

In fact, the CDC doesn't even recommend routine testing of asymptomatic vaccinated people for the coronavirus. As Gandhi of UC San Francisco explains, positive tests might just be picking up "dead viral particles in your nose," she said. "Vaccinated people may get it in their nose, but they're going to kill it that's actually what the immune system does."

There's no exact number of breakthrough cases, for several reasons. First of all, there would be no way to count the asymptomatic breakthrough cases, because the U.S. isn't testing nearly enough to catch them all. And in fact, the CDC stopped keeping a running tally of mild breakthrough cases in May.

But that's not necessarily a problem, said Emily Martin, epidemiology professor at the University of Michigan. "You don't want to test everybody you don't need every positive to be identified," she said. "You just need to understand how the positives that you're finding represent the whole pie that you're not seeing."

The CDC runs carefully designed surveillance systems (which try to find pie slices that are representative) and does burden estimation (calculations you use to fill in the rest of the pie). It's a process that's already done every year with the flu, Martin said, to assess how well the flu shot is working when the vast majority of people who get the flu are never tested.

Now, the CDC is doing the same thing to monitor COVID-19. Hospitals and health departments are sending the CDC detailed information about certain cases of vaccinated patients who are hospitalized with COVID-19.

"We'd like to have a sample of the virus so that we can understand the viral load, so that we can sequence it, we can understand their symptoms and their risks that potentially put them in that situation," the CDC's Walensky told a Senate panel on Tuesday.

At the same time, the agency is doing ongoing vaccine effectiveness studies at long-term care facilities, academic medical centers, hospitals, and among health care and essential workers. "We're doing many of those studies across the nation," Walensky said, explaining that these allow the CDC to get an accurate picture of the real rate of breakthroughs among vaccinated people and whether that's changing over time.

"That is a more systematic way of measuring breakthrough cases," Martin said. Realistically, health officials can't count every case, so this careful, long-term surveillance, along with calculations to extrapolate those findings, gives a fuller picture of how much virus is really out in the community.

There's basic arithmetic at play: As more people get vaccinated, even if breakthroughs are rare, a rising number of cases will be among the vaccinated.

"Even with a 95% efficacious vaccine, you will have one in 20 vaccinees who are exposed get the disease," said Dr. Kathleen Neuzil, director of the Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health at the University of Maryland. The important thing to note is that "the overwhelming number [of cases] are among the unvaccinated," she said.

Certainly, with the delta variant taking over which spreads about two to three times faster than the original strain there will be more cases among everyone, vaccinated and unvaccinated, said John Moore, professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medicine.

"But its ability to infect fully vaccinated people is much less than those who are not vaccinated," he said. "In other words, the vaccines still work, just a bit less well."

Epidemiologist Martin added that there's no clear data yet to show that delta is to blame for a big rise in breakthrough cases in the United States. "We are still watching carefully though," she added.

In general, people who are vaccinated and get infected have less virus. "That lower viral load makes it less likely for you to transmit not impossible by any means but less likely," Gandhi said.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser on COVID-19 for President Biden and the nation's top infectious disease expert, told reporters Friday that research on "whether or not the transmission occurs is a large study that's ongoing right now," referring to Prevent COVID U, a study of transmission among about 12,000 college students vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine.

While there aren't yet results from that study, Fauci added, the lower viral load in breakthrough cases suggests "it would be less likely that that vaccinated breakthrough person would transmit, compared to an unvaccinated person."

Even so, with cases rising and the vaccination campaign in a slump, a growing chorus of health experts is recommending using masking and other mitigation strategies to prevent spread just in case. "I think that the prudent thing at this point in time and what I'm doing personally," Emory's del Rio said, "if I'm going to a place that it's crowded, where there are multiple individuals, including people who are likely not vaccinated, I am wearing a mask."

"We have not seen reports yet of breakthrough cases causing long COVID, thank goodness," said Gandhi of UC San Francisco. One reason for that could be that long COVID involves "a very dysregulated inflammatory response that you get with natural infection," she said. "What you get with an infection after you've been vaccinated, it's what we call a more regulated response or adaptive immunity."

However, virus expert Angela Rasmussen of the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada noted the data on this is limited so we can't completely rule it out.

"The safest thing to do is to avoid being infected altogether, and that's why I think it is appropriate for people to employ additional mitigation measures," she said.

That might mean in addition to vaccination breaking out masks again, re-upping good hand hygiene and getting more air circulating when gathering indoors. "The mitigation measures that we have put in place previously will still work against the delta variant it's not being transmitted by some other route," she added.

NPR's Allison Aubrey contributed to this report.

Visit link:

What Is A Breakthrough COVID Case, And How Big Is The Risk? : Shots - Health News - NPR

Page 508«..1020..507508509510..520530..»