Coronavirus Bay Area live updates: Lafayette Art and Wine Festival canceled due to COVID-19 ‘setback’ – KGO-TV
Visit link:
Visit link:
A teacher walks with a student, as they wear protective masks on the first day of school, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, at St. Lawrence Catholic School in North Miami Beach, Florida, U.S. August 18, 2021. REUTERS/Marco Bello
Aug 18 (Reuters) - Florida's largest school district on Wednesday imposed a mask mandate in defiance of the state's governor, the latest chapter in the coronavirus political battle in the southern United States where new infections are highest.
At a day-long meeting that grew contentious at times, the Miami-Dade County School Board voted to require most of the district's 360,000 students, as well as staff, to wear face coverings when classes begin on Monday. Governor Ron DeSantis previously placed a ban on local mask mandates.
While I am a very, very strong advocate, and always have been, for parental choice, what we are facing in our community is a public health emergency where lives are at risk, said board chair Perla Tabares Hantman, who supported the mandate.
The requirement, which the board approved by a 7-1 vote following the recommendation of its superintendent, exempts student who cannot wear masks for medical reasons.
DeSantis last month signed an executive order barring local officials from imposing mask mandates. Like some other Republican governors, he has called mask-wearing a personal choice which for students should be made by parents.
Miami-Dade joins at least two other counties that have bucked the governor's order.
The state Board of Education on Tuesday voted unanimously to punish Broward and Alachua counties for mandating masks in schools in defiance of the governor's order, local media reported.
They are the first to be punished, although no specific actions have been taken against them, the local media said.
DAILY DEATHS TOP 1,000
As officials across the South spar over mask mandates, COVID-19 deaths in the United States reached a five-month high on Tuesday.
More than 1,000 people were reported to have died on Tuesday, the most in one day since March, after the virus death toll spiked over the past month to a daily average of 769, according to a Reuters tally.
In Tampa, Florida, nearly 5,600 students and over 300 employees of a single school district remained in isolation or quarantine on Wednesday after either catching COVID-19 or potentially being exposed to it.
In Hillsborough County, which includes Tampa, the school board planned to hold an emergency meeting on Wednesday to determine the best way to mitigate the spread of the virus.
Florida had the country's third largest number of new coronavirus infections last week, while Texas, where Governor Greg Abbott has also been at odds with some local officials over masks, had the 12th, according to a Reuters tally.
The top 10 states with most new cases were all in the South.
Abbott, also a Republican, announced on Tuesday that he had tested positive for COVID-19, despite having been fully vaccinated, but had no symptoms of the illness.
The school district in Paris, Texas, about 100 miles (160 km) northeast of Dallas, took a novel approach in its disagreement with the governor, making face masks part of the dress code for its nearly 4,000 students.
"The Board believes the dress code can be used to mitigate communicable health issues, and therefore has amended the (Paris Independent School District) dress code to protect our students and employees," the board said in a statement on Tuesday.
Reporting by Peter Szekely and Tyler Clifford in New York and Anurag Maan in Bangalore; Editing by Howard Goller
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
See the original post here:
War over masks deepens in U.S. South where COVID-19 cases are highest - Reuters
In most cases, they found, the chain of transmission stopped with the infected child, but in 27.3 percent of households, children passed the virus along to at least one other resident.
Aug. 16, 2021, 1:10 p.m. ET
Adolescents were most likely to bring the virus into the home: Children from 14 to 17 made up 38 percent of all the index cases. Children who were 3 or younger were the first to get sick in just 12 percent of households but they were the most likely to spread the virus to others in their homes. The odds of household transmission were roughly 40 percent higher when the infected child was 3 or younger than when they were between 14 and 17.
The findings may be the result of behavioral differences between toddlers and teenagers, medical experts said.
When we think about whats teen social behavior outside of the house, theyre spending a lot of time together, theyre often in quite close quarters, theyre often touching or sharing a drink, said Dr. Susan E. Coffin, an infectious disease specialist at Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, who was not involved in the study.
Those behaviors could make teens more likely to contract the virus and bring it home, she said.
On the other hand, while very young children probably have less social interaction outside the home, they tend to be in close physical contact with others in their households, in addition to frequently putting their hands and other objects in their mouths, which could help spread the virus. Once they bring it into the household, it can be spread easily, Dr. Coffin said.
It is also possible that the youngest children may carry higher levels of virus, or have higher rates of viral shedding, than teenagers, the researchers noted. Some studies have found that even though young children rarely get seriously ill, they may carry similar, or even higher, levels of virus than adults do. Although viral load is not a perfect predictor of infectiousness, the data suggest that children could potentially be as contagious as adults.
But the dynamics of disease transmission are complicated, and the precise role that children play in spreading the virus remains uncertain.
See the original post here:
Health officials on Monday reported a spike of 2,996 coronavirus cases over the weekend, as infections continue to surge at a troubling pace amid the more highly contagious delta variant.
Every Massachusetts county is now at high risk or substantial risk for COVID transmission, according to the CDC tracker, but Gov. Charlie Baker on Monday said he would not be implementing an indoor mask mandate amid spiking cases. Many communities, instead of waiting for Baker, have ordered mask mandates for everyone regardless of their vaccination status.
After the new 2,996 COVID infections reported over the weekend, the Bay States seven-day average of virus cases is now 911. Thats more than 14 times the daily average of 64 cases in June.
The average percent positivity is now at 2.74%, which is nearly nine times the daily average of 0.31% in June.
State health officials on Monday also reported six new COVID deaths from over the weekend, bringing the states total recorded death toll to 18,148.
Virus deaths have been higher in the last week after several weeks of rising cases and hospitalizations. The seven-day average of COVID deaths is now 5.7, up from the record-low daily average of 1.1 in mid July.
Hospitalizations continued to increase over the weekend. The state reported a jump of 27 COVID patients, bringing the statewide total of COVID patients to 402.
There are now 82 patients in intensive care units, and 38 patients are intubated.
The overall count of 402 patients is more than five times the count of 80 COVID patients on July 4. The 402 patients is back to where the state was in mid May.
More than 4.4 million people in Massachusetts have been fully vaccinated.
Go here to see the original:
BANGKOK, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Thai police used water cannon and tear gas to disperse protesters near the office of Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha on Monday, as opposition parties moved to censure him in parliament over his handling of a COVID-19 crisis.
Hundreds of protesters marched on the Government House to demand Prayuth resigns, the latest show of growing public anger about a worsening epidemic and a chaotic vaccine rollout.
The rallies are being led by groups who also sought former army chief Prayuth's ouster last year, accusing him and his allies of seeking to entrench the military's control of politics.
"We are out here to stop the ongoing failure and stop the losses, because if Prayuth Chan-ocha remains in power, more people will die," activist Songpon "Yajai" Sonthirak said during the march.
People stand among tear gas during a protest over the government's handling of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Bangkok, Thailand, August 16, 2021. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun
Read More
Opposition lawmakers on Monday filed a no-confidence motion against Prayuth and five of his cabinet ministers, which will lead to a censure debate over the COVID-19 crisis, likely later his month or early September, according to house speaker.
Police fired tear gas cannisters and used water cannon when protesters tried to dismantle a police barricade on Monday, the latest as in a series of recent demonstrations that led to violence, including the use of rubber bullets to disperse protests.
Clashes also took place late on Monday near Prayuth's residence in another part of the capital.
"Bangkok has declared an emergency and a gathering or activity involving more than five people is not possible, it's illegal," said Piya Tavichai, deputy head of the Bangkok police.
Reporting by Panu Wongcha-um and Panarat Thepgumpanat; Editing by Martin Petty
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Read the original post:
Clashes in Thailand as pressure builds on PM over coronavirus crisis - Reuters
Every county in Illinois except one is seeing "substantial" or "high" community transmission of COVID-19, placing nearly the entire state in the category in which everyone over the age of 2 should resume wearing a mask indoors, regardless of vaccination status, federal health officials say.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidance late last month to recommend that fully vaccinated people wear masks in indoor settings again in areas of the U.S. that are seeing "substantial" or "high" transmission of COVID-19.
The new guidance marked a reversal from earlier recommendations that said fully vaccinated people could remove masks in most settings.
So in which areas is the CDC advising people wear masks indoors? The agency points to its COVID-19 data tracker showing levels of community transmission, along with other data, for each county in the U.S.
As of Saturday, 101 of Illinois 102 counties were experiencing either substantial or high levels of community transmission, triggering the recommendation to mask indoors, regardless of vaccination status.
The only county still in the "moderate" transmission level is Stark County, with 98 counties - including every county in the Chicago area - seeing "high" transmission and just three in the "substantial" transmission range: Putnam, Lee and Whiteside counties, all west of the Chicago area.
The agency uses two measuresto group U.S. counties into the four levels of community transmission: the number of new cases per 100,000 residents and the percent of COVID-19 tests that are positive over the past week.
If a county has reported 50 to 100 cases per 100,000 residents over a seven-day period or has a positivity rate of 8% to 10%, it falls into the "substantial transmission" tier, while those reporting 100 cases or more per 100,000 or have a positivity rate of at least 10% are labeled as "high transmission." Those are the two groups for which the CDC recommends mask-wearing.
The CDC also said last week that fully vaccinated people also "might choose to mask regardless of the level of transmission, particularly if they or someone in their household is immunocompromised or atincreased risk for severe disease, or if someone in their household is unvaccinated."
The Illinois Department of Public Health said last month that it was "fully adopting" the CDC's updated guidance and following federal health officials' lead in recommending masking indoors at K-12 schools universally among teachers, staff, students and visitors to schools, regardless of vaccination status.
Then on Aug. 4, Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced a new mask mandate, requiring - rather than recommending - that all students, teachers and staff in K-12 schools wear masks while indoors as officials take steps to try to slow the spread of the more transmissible delta variant.
Pritzker said that the new requirement would take effect immediately, and will also apply to all students and coaches participating in indoor sports and other activities.
"As your governor, it's my duty to say that we must all take immediate and urgent action to slow the spread of the delta variant," he said. "People are dying who don't have to die."
Pritzker added that the state has a "limited amount of time" to slow the spread of the delta variant.
State employees who work in congregant care facilities, veterans' homes and correctional facilities will also be required to receive COVID-19 vaccinations, according to the governor.
Read the original post:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention wasnt allowed to visit the city of Wuhan, China, or the Wuhan Institute of Virology in early 2020. Weve been trying to find out why ever since. Had we encountered transparency rather than stonewalling, it wouldnt have been necessary to put together the circumstantial pieces of the puzzle on our own.
On Sept. 12, 2019, coronavirus bat sequences were deleted from the institutes database. Why? It changed the security protocols for the lab. Why? It put out requests for more than $600 million for a new ventilation system. What prompted this new need?
In January 2020 two hypotheses emerged about the origin of the novel coronavirus: that it began in a bat, then infected another animal before spreading to humans in a Wuhan wet market, where wild animals are sold for meat; or that it emerged from the Wuhan laboratory. The wet-market story was pushed by the Chinese CDC and the World Health Organization. Public-health leaders argued that Covid-19 was like SARS and MERS, earlier coronaviruses that emerged from bats and spread through an intermediate animal.
But neither of those viruses has ever evolved to the point where it can transmit efficiently from one human to the next. There have been fewer than 10,000 cases of each virus world-wide since SARS was discovered in 2003 and MERS in 2012. What virus comes out of a bat cave and infects humans by the millions? Its not biologically plausible. If instead it evolved slowly over many years in nature, how come no one knew of it?
One of the lab theories hypothesizes that SARS-CoV-2 was manipulated or taught to infect humans. Imagine several viruses being run through humanized mice (grafted with human tissue and immune cells) to test their ability to infect human tissue. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 includes a kind of cleavage site that allows its spike protein to change its orientation and dock more easily with a human cell.
Originally posted here:
The World Needs to Know What Happened at the Wuhan Lab - The Wall Street Journal
CNN
Its no surprise that a politicians worst enemy is a vibrant news media. Journalists who stick their noses into the affairs of the powerful and expose their failures are a threat. Its therefore no great shock that even many leaders of democratic countries are happier when the press is weakened.
The Covid-19 pandemic has presented a golden window to undermine confidence in the media and, in some cases, for world leaders to launch outright assaults on some of the most respected and important journalistic institutions in their countries.
Earlier this week, the Polish parliament passed a bill that could mean curtains for the countrys largest independent news channel. TVN24, a broadcaster that is frequently critical of the Polish governing party, is in part owned by the American media group Discovery. Should this new bill become law, non-EU entities will be prohibited from being majority shareholders in Polish media companies, meaning Discovery would have to sell its majority stake.
Also this week, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz put forward his plan that would effectively pull funding from the countrys oldest newspaper.
Wiener Zeitung is a state-owned newspaper and is funded by a model that requires the government to advertise jobs and make other formal announcements in its pages. Yet the paper has an independent editorial policy and has often criticized Kurz and his administration. Under the Chancellors plans, that funding would be gone and the papers main source of income taken away.
Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto/Getty Images
People attend "Free media" protest in Wadowice, Poland on August 10, 2021.
Whats shocking about these two incidents is that they are happening in democratic Western nations. While journalists elsewhere face risk of prosecution or even death threats, the fact this is happening in Europe and is part of a broader trend is seriously concerning for the media and citizens alike.
What has this got to do with coronavirus? Short answer: timing.
In times of crisis trust in government goes up because people just want somebody to fix things, so you see people rally around the flag, says Ben Page, chief executive of polling firm Ipsos MORI.
Page says these spikes in support provide a window of opportunity that distracts from what you are doing elsewhere. And if you are a politician seeking to capitalize on this, whacking and weakening the press is a relatively easy proposition. Im afraid journalism is one of the least-trusted professions all over the world, he adds.
The reasons for public distrust in journalism are varied.
One of our biggest problems as professional journalists is that all over the world, we have been accused as being part of the system and establishment, says Pierre Haski, president of Reporters Without Borders (RSF). So as populist movements grow and rise up against the establishment, they rise up against us.
Haski thinks that it isnt just populist movements that present a danger, but also mainstream politicians who are losing voters to more extreme opposition.
Janek Skarzynski/AFP/Getty Images
Protesters demonstrate in defence of media freedom in Warsaw on August 10, 2021.
He points specifically to an incident in 2018, when French President Emmanuel Macron reportedly said: We have a press that is no longer pursuing the truth What I see is media power that wants to become judicial power. The comments came after a member of his security team was caught on camera attacking protesters while off duty.
In one sentence he delegitimized all media and how we operate. It was eerily close to something Trump might have said, says Haski.
Haski is, of course, correct to note incidents like this happening before the pandemic. What the coronavirus has provided is a moment in history when a decent chunk of the public is happy with governments behaving in a more authoritarian way, populist leadership is more appealing, accurate information is literally a case of life or death and journalists are not particularly liked.
As soon as a government decides we are in a crisis and need unity, they can cut the ground under journalists whose job it is to get to the truth because they risk becoming the traitor who is driving the disunity, says Nic Cheeseman, professor of democracy at Birmingham University.
Someone who cannot be ignored in all of this is former US President Donald Trump.
Even before winning the 2016 election, Trump made slamming the press a central prong of his campaign. And in the years that followed his victory, nearly every negative news story, negative approval rating and election loss was dismissed as fake news.
Trumps attacks on the media intensified during the pandemic. He regularly accused it of overplaying the threat of the virus and seemed to live in a parallel universe when it came to the numbers and science. And when the most important person on the planet does something, others take notice.
photo illustration/Alberto Mier
Donald Trump's attacks on the media intensified during the pandemic.
Donald Trump gave a cue to leaders around the world that attacking the media was now fair game, says Rob Mahoney, deputy executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists.
When he launched attacks on the media (over their coverage) of his shambolic handling of the pandemic, the very moment the public needs as accurate information as possible, leaders in India, Brazil, the Philippines and Western Europe followed suit, denying the severity of the virus to cover their own failures, he adds.
The question many are asking is what the long-term impact will be, now that going after journalists is routine in so many free, liberal countries.
The industry was already facing a lot of challenges. Proper news is expensive to make and the media landscape has shifted dramatically in ways that have not been easy for journalism.
Modern technology has made it easier for one person sitting at home to run a website that looks as legitimate as that of a centuries-old newspaper. This has created a world in which there is no longer a consensus on facts and a significant number of people are willing to believe things that are simply not true.
This lack of consensus puts journalists who speak truth to power on one side of a debate and lies on the other.
When you put all of this into the context of an unprecedented pandemic, its easy to see why the past 18 months have been an ideal time for leaders to pick a side.
And as we emerge from this crisis into whatever the new normal looks like, leaders who decided to side with lies will be remembered by everyone and, to some extent, will determine what that new normal is.
View post:
In late June alone, the initiative known as Covax sent some 530,000 doses to Britain more than double the amount sent that month to the entire continent of Africa.
Under Covax, countries were supposed to give money so vaccines could be set aside, both as donations to poor countries and as an insurance policy for richer ones to buy doses if theirs fell through. Some rich countries, including those in the EU, calculated that they had more than enough doses available through bilateral deals and ceded their allocated Cova doses to poorer countries.
But others, including Britain, tapped into the meagre supply of Covax doses themselves, despite being among the countries that had reserved most of the worlds available vaccines. In the meantime, billions of people in poor countries have yet to receive a single dose.
The result is that poorer countries have landed in exactly the predicament Covax was supposed to avoid: dependent on the whims and politics of rich countries for donations, just as they have been so often in the past. And in many cases, rich countries dont want to donate in significant amounts before they finish vaccinating all their citizens who could possibly want a dose, a process that is still playing out.
If we had tried to withhold vaccines from parts of the world, could we have made it any worse than it is today? asked Dr. Bruce Aylward, a senior advisor at the World Health Organization, during a public session on vaccine equity.
The government is a strong champion of Covax, the UK said, describing the initiative as a mechanism for all countries to obtain vaccines, not just those in need of donations. It declined to explain why it chose to receive those doses despite private deals that have reserved eight injections for every UK resident.
Originally posted here:
As the contagious delta variant fueled an unprecedented spike in COVID-19 cases and hospitalization during the past month, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown and her health advisers repeated the same mantra: no more state mandates, let local leaders take action.
But virtually no one did. Weeks went by, and local officials publicly acknowledged a lack of political will for renewed safeguards absent a directive from Brown.
When Brown finally spoke to top officials for Oregons 36 counties Aug. 6, during a regularly scheduled meeting, some expected she might deliver a stern warning: Enough is enough, bring back mask mandates or other measures now, or Ill do it.
But she didnt say that. In fact, she made no specific request for action by counties, people on the call told The Oregonian/OregonLive. Brown explained that the coronavirus was now out of control and threatening to overwhelm the states hospital capacity, then asked: What are you going to do about it?
The answer, in all but a few cases, was very little. Eventually the conversation ended with no clear picture of what would come next.
It was odd, said Lane County Commission Chair Joe Berney, who was on the call. There was a total lack of direction and leadership from her.
Brown now paints that call as a pivotal moment in her controversial decision to renew the statewide mask mandate, which she announced Tuesday and that took effect Friday. Shes indicated that only during that meeting did it become clear local officials were not willing to make the tough decisions.
But that blame-shifting narrative during Oregons record-breaking summer surge ignores weeks of evidence that many local leaders across the state never had any intention of acting weeks where Brown herself delayed a difficult decision as cases soared and hospitalizations climbed faster than ever before.
It also leaves out the fact that on July 27, the Oregon Health Authority gave Brown a detailed briefing on Oregons rising coronavirus case load, the prevalence of the delta variant and slowing vaccination rates. As part of that presentation, state epidemiologist Dr. Dean Sidelinger said that universal indoor mask usage would help control the delta variants spread, although he stopped short of calling for a mandate.
Brown that day issued a public recommendation for indoor masking, citing guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But she and state health officials decided against a requirement.
Browns finger-pointing at counties also ignores the reality that asking 36 jurisdictions to adopt their own public health edicts in a checkerboard fashion was both impractical and ineffective. The virus knows no borders, and county officials say they lack a mechanism to enforce local mandates. Meanwhile, many county commissioners had already expressed opposition to public health requirements, while others represent constituents who are outright hostile to them.
The governors office and state health officials did begin shifting their tone as the surge worsened. In public statements, they strongly recommended on July 22 that local officials consider masking, emphasized Aug. 3 that local action was expected in hard-hit areas, declared Aug. 6 that local inaction was unacceptable, and expressly called for local officials to set mask requirements to set mask mandates on Aug. 9.
Brown, with the power to reinstate a statewide mask mandate all along, announced her plan the following day.
The widespread inaction over those crucial weeks helps explain how Oregon now finds itself a national outlier, one of only five states whose summer surge has outpaced previous pandemic peaks. Oregon set new records Friday, averaging 1,652 cases a day in the past week, with 733 people hospitalized with COVID-19, including 185 people requiring intensive care.
And the numbers are projected to get worse. Much worse.
With hospitals around the state already operating at or near full capacity, researchers at Oregon Health & Science University forecast this week that the state could expect about 1,100 people with COVID-19 hospitalized by Sept. 7 -- a surge health care providers say they dont have the beds or staff to accommodate. Brown on Friday activated the Oregon National Guard to help.
The governor declined to be interviewed for this story. Since hosting a reopening celebration June 30 to suggest the pandemics worst days had passed, she held no official news conference specifically to address the quickly deteriorating coronavirus situation until appearing Wednesday to explain the mask mandate as a necessary measure that can save lives right now.
In response to written questions, her office did not point to any specific instances this summer where state officials directly asked county leaders to take specific action to slow the spread, although they said communications about the pandemic occur regularly.
Local leaders shouldnt need an invitation to take action to protect the lives of their constituents, Charles Boyle, a spokesperson for Brown, said in an email. Throughout the pandemic, county leaders have asked for local control to make health and safety decisions for their counties. When informed about the rapid spread of the delta variant, most county leaders did nothing.
Some of those same counties remain resistant. Dan DeYoung, chair of Josephine County, said he still prefers local control and is skeptical the mask mandate will be met with broad compliance.
Only 43% of Josephine County residents are vaccinated, well below the 60% rate statewide among people of all ages. Josephine County recorded Oregons highest coronavirus case rate this week, and the areas hospitals have more than twice as many people hospitalized with COVID-19 than in earlier waves.
Theres just a lot of people who are philosophically against them, DeYoung said of state edicts.
To be sure, the delta variant is ravaging the entire country and the governor is in a no-win political situation. Her every decision during the pandemic to implement safeguards has been second guessed and loudly criticized by political opponents, local elected officials and average citizens, who have decried her as a tyrant and even burned her in effigy in front of the Capitol. A month ago, University of Oregon researchers, citing poll results, suggested the governor stop acting as a vaccine spokesperson because she was deeply unpopular among vaccine-hesitant Oregonians.
Advocates want Brown to get credit for becoming just the third governor to reinstate a statewide mask mandate. But thats in part a necessity: the other state leaders who have done so, in Louisiana and Hawaii, are also experiencing their worst outbreaks of the pandemic.
Because Oregon had done so well preventing coronavirus spread until now, with some of the nations very lowest case and death rates, thats left more people without natural immunity from previous infections. Even with the 18th highest vaccination rate, Oregon finds itself with the 16th highest case rate in the last week, according to federal data.
Resurrecting the mask mandate a few weeks ago -- even just one week ago -- could have headed off many cases, hospitalizations and ultimately deaths, one expert said.
It could have made a huge difference ... more lives could have been saved. No doubt about it, said Ali Mokdad, an epidemiologist with the University of Washingtons COVID-19 forecasting arm, the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. The institute on July 22 projected that Oregon could set hospitalizations records, albeit not until this fall.
Mokdad said Browns decision to require masks is a smart move. He said masks, which reduce aerosol spray and limit coronavirus spread, are needed coast to coast.
Every state should have had it, he said, and every state should have had it a long time ago.
*
The mood was jovial June 30 as Brown announced the states official reopening after more than a year of pandemic restrictions. Standing on a stage at Providence Park for a Reopening Oregon celebration, Brown declared: We celebrate brighter days ahead. And, today, we celebrate that Oregon is 100% open for business.
Those brighter days lasted about a week.
Oregon soon saw its lowest numbers in months, bottoming out at 150 cases a day and 99 people hospitalized with COVID-19. And the Oregon Health Authority, which since February 2020 had led the states public health pandemic response, made clear local health authorities would now be responsible for managing outbreaks going forward.
But the delta variant had other plans.
By July 12, the states case and hospitalization numbers were clearly climbing once again. Ten days later, on July 22, with cases and hospitalizations still rising, the Oregon Health Authority doubled down on its hands-off approach.
A localized pandemic demands effective localized public health interventions, not a statewide response, Patrick Allen, the agencys director, said at the time.
Only Oregons largest county, heavily vaccinated Multnomah, prepared to heed that guidance.
County Chair Deborah Kafoury said her public health team began warning her around July 25 that a local mask mandate likely would be necessary. Input from local hospitals and the departments own data modeling forecast a spike in cases driven by the delta variant.
But, Kafoury said, issuing a mandate too early might erode public confidence because the numbers didnt yet reflect the dire predictions. So the county decided to issue a public health advisory July 26 recommending everyone over the age of five wear masks in all indoor public spaces, regardless of whether they had been vaccinated.
We thought if we were to do a mandate closer to school opening, we could frame it around keeping business open and getting kids back in school, she said.
Officials at the Oregon Health Authority were coming to similar conclusions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on July 27 formally recommended indoor masking, and the state followed suit that same day.
Sidelinger, the state epidemiologist, updated Brown and public health officials in a biweekly meeting on the states vaccination progress, the prevalence of the delta variant and the early uptick in hospitalized COVID patients, including those in intensive care units. Sidelinger noted that although vaccines were still preventing serious illness among people sickened by the delta variant, it was much more contagious and research in Israel showed the variant spread among vaccinated, unmasked people.
Sidelinger listed universal mask use in indoor public places as one of the states available tools to combat rising infections, according to records of the presentation, but he stopped short of advising Brown to issue a mandate.
Officials had a vigorous discussion of an indoor mask mandate in public settings, Robb Cowie, a spokesperson for the health authority, said in an email answering questions about the meeting.
Brown and state public health officials ultimately recognized that broad buy-in and adherence were just as important to the success of a mask mandate as issuing the actual requirement, Cowie said.
State policy-makers decided to give local leaders another opportunity to take action, he added, and state officials continued their discussions with local commissioners, public health officials and hospitals.
*
The situation spiraled out of control in the following weeks, particularly in southern and eastern Oregon, two areas most resistant to restrictions.
By Aug. 2, Oregon was averaging more cases a day than in the spring peak, and hospitalizations were about to pass that similar crest.
Brown did not spend the week working the phones with county officials to convince them to issue mask mandates. Instead, she met with representatives of at least 10 major employers or industry groups, including Intel and the bankers and grocers associations, to ask if they were going to require their employees to get vaccinated.
Brown implied the state was preparing to mandate its employees get vaccinated and she would appreciate it if other major employers did the same, perhaps hoping it would lead to action among even smaller companies.
Sandra McDonough, president of Oregon Business & Industry, which is the states largest business lobbying group, said she spoke with Brown several times in recent weeks. As hospitals struggled with an influx of mostly unvaccinated COVID patients, McDonough said, she told the governors team and others that they need to do a better job of helping the public understand whats going on in the health system right now.
Meanwhile, two days before Browns Aug. 6 meeting with county officials, Multnomah County health experts came back to Kafoury.
They were strongly recommending a mask mandate right now, Kafoury said. We had another discussion and decided wed announce it the following week.
We needed to have it done at a statewide level but when we saw that wasnt going to happen we needed to move, said Kafoury, who added that she was glad Brown acted but wished it happened sooner.
Officials in Lane County expressed similar frustration. Four days after Browns Aug. 6 call with county chairs across the state, County Administrator Steve Mokrohisky told commissioners there was no mechanism to enforce a local mandate and no staff available to follow up on complaints. They planned to issue a recommendation.
Without the state taking action we have to do what we can locally, Mokrohisky said, adding that businesses and organizations were crying out for clear guidance. They just want someone to tell (them) what to do.
The governors call with county leaders seemingly helped convince only one person, Washington County Chair Kathryn Harrington, that more action was needed. Harrington also knew Multnomah County was planning to enact a mask mandate.
Harrington made an impassioned plea to her fellow commissioners to protect children by adopting a mask mandate in Washington County. Four of the five expressed support during a meeting Tuesday, and county staff were instructed to draft the legislation for a vote at a special meeting.
Harrington said she isnt critical of the governors timing. But she is concerned that rural counties with low and slowing vaccination numbers are exporting their problems to the metro area, where vaccination rates are among the highest in the state.
In Josephine and Jackson counties, 20% of people that go to hospitals get transferred up to our metro area hospitals, she said. Were having to bear the burden of other counties not being successful in their vaccination efforts. Thats a real problem.
Don Russell, chair of the Morrow County board in eastern Oregon, said he doesnt understand vaccine resistance in his community, where only 38% of the population among all ages is vaccinated.
But the reasons to them are real and you cant convince them, he said.
Russell, like other county officials interviewed for this story, said hes unaware of any specific requests that the governor or the Oregon Health Authority made to counties regarding local public health mandates.
It almost has to come from the governor, he said. We dont have any hammer. How would we enforce it? ... Maybe I should look at (the mask mandate) as a bonus. She took that rotten egg out of our pocket.
Ultimately, any deeper reasons behind the timing of Browns decision to renew the mask mandate remain opaque. While she declined an interview request from The Oregonian/OregonLive, Brown made time for a national television appearance Thursday.
The timing was right to take action and thats what its taken during the pandemic, quick and decisive action, and thats what Im taking, Brown told a national ABC News host.
Asked by The Oregonian/OregonLive why Brown ever thought local leaders in certain communities would renew restrictions, the governors spokesperson reiterated that those officials shouldnt need an invitation to save lives.
Local leaders in counties with low vaccination rates were in a unique position to help convince their constituents about the effectiveness of vaccines and masks, Boyle wrote. Its unfortunate that hospitals in those regions are now facing the sharpest increases in COVID-19 hospitalizations, and those same local leaders are requesting help from the state and federal governments.
Oregon now heads forward with 1.7 million Oregonians, including all children under the age of 12, unvaccinated and delta running rampant.
Schools plan to open full-time next month.
In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom recently announced he would require teachers to get vaccinated or take weekly COVID tests.
Brown, in her news conference Wednesday, said she plans to issue no such state mandate, leaving any action to local superintendents and school boards.
That, she said, is in their very capable hands.
To see more data and trends, visit https://projects.oregonlive.com/coronavirus/
-- Staff writer Aimee Green contributed to this story
-- Ted Sickinger; tsickinger@oregonian.com; 503-221-8505; @tedsickinger
View original post here:
Coronavirus overtook Oregon. Who should have made tough decisions? - OregonLive