Category: Corona Virus

Page 402«..1020..401402403404..410420..»

COVID-19 Is Over (If You’re Rich) – The Atlantic

February 13, 2022

At the start of the pandemic, COVID-19 was often depicted as an agent of random chaos, a disease that affected everyone irrespective of their race, gender, or socioeconomic status. On virtually every count, this assumption has proved to be false. Although the coronavirus managed to disrupt how human beings live and work, it didnt do so proportionally. The crisis hit an unequal world and, when it did, exacerbated those inequalities. By and large, living through the worst of the pandemic has been easier for the wealthy, many of whom could afford to maintain a certain semblance of normalcy while mitigating health risks. The superrich got even richer.

To get a glimpse into the world of the affluent during the pandemic, I reached out to many of the businesses that flourished off them. Private jets, superyachts, personal catering, concierge medicinethese industries have not only survived but thrived during the pandemic, in large part because they could provide their customers with all the things that COVID-19 had rendered in short supply, like safely, seclusion, and, above all, a sense of control. The wealthy have already learned how to live with COVID-19 (albeit at a very high cost). Now the rest of the world must figure out how to do the same, on a budget.

Perhaps the most obvious luxury enjoyed by the wealthy during the pandemic has been relatively safe and reliable travel. Take private jets. Yann-Guillaume Jaccard, the CEO and a co-founder of the private aviation company Simply Jet, told me that at the start of the pandemic, his business, like most others in the travel industry, nearly came to a grinding halt, save for flights to get people back to their home country. But once international-travel restrictions started to loosen, Simply Jet began to experience what would ultimately become an industry-wide boom. At a time when travel feels precarious and expensive, we are seeing unprecedented levels of activity, Jaccard said, noting that demand for private jets is higher now than it was before the 2008 financial crisis, which he said had previously been considered the golden age of private aviation. Back then, clients might have sought out private jets for the luxury or the privacy. But now, demand is being driven by one thing: safety.

When you fly with a commercial airline, you might come in contact with dozens, if not hundreds, of people during check-in, security, and boarding. But when you fly private, the number of interactions is significantly reduced. Private-jet fliers typically depart from and arrive at a private terminal, where they are joined only by security and their flight crew. Additional services, such as rapid COVID-19 tests and even private doctors, can be provided on-site. This is impossible to replicate with a commercial flight, Jaccard said.

That kind of peace of mind doesnt come cheap. Although short-haul private flights on a small, four-person jet can start at $6,000 to $7,000 one way, a transatlantic flight on a larger, 12-person aircraft can go for as much as $120,000 one way.

Over the past two years, private-island brokers and yacht sellers have also reported a surge in sales, owing in large part to the influx of affluent clients seeking to escape the pandemic by any means necessary. Islands in the strong local markets have all basically sold out, Chris Krolow, the CEO of the online marketplace Private Islands Inc. and the host of the reality-TV show Island Hunters, told me. Buyers can spend $1.5 million to $3 million on a small island, depending on the size and location, with bigger ones going for as much as $300 million. Size and location arent the main criteria buyers are worried about, though. Its telecommunications, Krolow said. Its Can I work from the island? Meanwhile, in the yachting world, Raphael Sauleau, the CEO of Fraser Yachts, told me that his business saw a 175 percent increase in sales last year after selling $1.7 billion in yachts, prices for which start at $2 million.

Read: It pays to be rich during a pandemic

A refuge from the pandemic might have been the original reason behind the private-island boompartly inspired, perhaps, by the rich and famous touting their own archipelagic excursions as means of enjoying some pre-pandemic normalcybut several of the people I spoke with didnt necessarily see it that way. I dont think people are fearful of COVID anymore, Will Christie, the founder of Christie Yachts, a superyacht broker, told me. These days, he chalks up the heightened demand to people wanting to reclaim their freedom to travel and see the world from the comfort of their own floating home, complete with its own chef and crew. That sense of wanting to escape and explore the worldthe demand for that has never been higher.

The desire for more quotidian luxuries, such as dining in a restaurant, has been a boon for another industry that caters (literally) to the rich: private-chef services. Michael Kaplan, a restaurateur and co-founder of New Wave Hospitality, in Miami, told me that during the pandemic, he has helped place more than a dozen out-of-work chefs with affluent clients, some of whom are willing to pay as much as $180,000 a year for a full-time chef. According to Kaplan, the appeal is more than re-creating experiences that the pandemic rendered temporarily unviable. Its no longer just about getting a reservation at a restaurant, he said. Its transitioned to this idea of access and exclusivity, one that he predicts will last long after the pandemic does.

Saima Khan, the founder of the Hampstead Kitchen, a London-based catering service, told me that some of her clients have been prepared to pay ridiculous amounts of money to mark special occasions during the pandemic while still abiding by public-health guidance. One such dinner took place on a private jet flying from London to Scotland at a cost of $3,377 a person. (Renting a plane also allowed her clients to avoid running afoul of Britain's COVID-19 restrictions, which forbade groups of more than six people from dining together in restaurants or pubs.) Another catered dinner, this time to celebrate a 15th wedding anniversary, was staged in a garden with an opera singer and a grand piano. To bring families together within the rules that we have, we have to be creative, Khan said. To be creative, you have to spend money. [Our clients] see the value in that.

Rich folks ability to access immediate and reliable health care and at-home COVID-19 tests, the latter of which were virtually impossible to find in the United States until recently, also made a different sort of pandemic experience available to them. In the early months of the pandemic, Sollis Health, a members-only medical service based in New York City, made headlines after reportedly providing its affluent clients with easy access to COVID-19 tests at a time when those resources were still scarce. Sabine Heller, the chief commercial officer for Sollis, told me that the concierge service has expanded since then, with members now enjoying unlimited rapid, PCR, and antibody testing as well as monoclonal antibody treatments and other services. Memberships start at $3,000 a year.

Read: Not everyone can afford to learn to live with COVID-19

For the wealthiest, this kind of opulence offers a sneak peek of what adapting to life with COVID-19 in perpetuityand, by extension, all of the new variants, exposure risks, and health issues that come with itmight involve. For the rest of society, however, the path forward is less clear. Air travel, while picking up, remains subject to changing restrictions and, for some families, is prohibitively expensive. Dining out and other activities, although possible in most places, come with their own share of potential health risks. Meanwhile, regular COVID-19 testing is still costly despite the Biden administrations commitment to distribute 1 billion at-home rapid tests to Americans for free (a service that is currently limited to just four tests per household). Not everyone who catches the virus can necessarily afford to take time off work to isolate and recover, let alone decamp to a private villa on the sea.

Nearly 500 people became billionaires over the course of the pandemic, and the richest among them doubled their fortune. Meanwhile, the great majority of humanity are worse off, Gabriela Bucher, the executive director of Oxfam International, told me. Those widening disparitiesand the huge gap between how the rich and the poor experienced the pandemichave led some to call for wealth redistribution. If the 10 richest people on the planet were to surrender 99 percent of the wealth they gained during the pandemic, we would have enough money to vaccinate the world; we would have the money to invest in having universal health care, Bucher told me. That would be a hefty levy. But hanging on to just 1 percent of their gains would still leave the ten most deep-pocketed humans $8 billion better off than they were at the beginning of March 2020.

Original post:

COVID-19 Is Over (If You're Rich) - The Atlantic

Traveling to Las Vegas during Covid-19: What you need to know before you go – CNN

February 13, 2022

(CNN) If you're planning to travel to Las Vegas, here's what you'll need to know and expect if you want to visit during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The basics

Nevada lifted its indoor mask mandate on February 10.

There are no restrictions on domestic travel to Las Vegas or the state of Nevada, but testing and vaccination requirements apply for most international arrivals to the United States.

What's on offer?

This is America's playground for adults, and gambling is the star attraction.

For those not swayed by the allure of slot machines and roulette wheels, Las Vegas has emerged as a major foodie destination. Comedians, singers and other entertainers also set up shop here.

The lights of the Las Vegas Strip at night are a spectacle unto themselves, and nearby desert escapes are outstanding.

Who can go

There are no restrictions on domestic travel to Las Vegas.

What are the restrictions?

Every air traveler entering the United States needs a negative Covid-19 test result. Passengers are required to get a test within one day before their flight to the United States departs and to provide documentation of their lab results. Or they must provide documentation of having recently recovered from Covid-19.

Las Vegas, as well as the rest of Nevada, doesn't have any testing or vaccination requirements on domestic travelers arriving for a vacation from within the US or its territories.

What's the Covid situation?

As of February 10, there was a seven-day average test positivity rate of 14%, down from a peak of 42.9% on January 9.

What can visitors expect?

The state of Nevada lifted its indoor mask mandate on February 10.

In a news conference, Gov. Steve Sisolak said, "Now is the appropriate time for me to announce that Nevada will rescind our mask mandate, effective immediately."

Sisolak said the state was better equipped to fight the pandemic, citing at-home testing kits and the decrease in overall cases and hospitalizations in the state.

Resources

More coverage

CNN's Forrest Brown, Michelle Watson and Marnie Hunter contributed to this report.

Read more here:

Traveling to Las Vegas during Covid-19: What you need to know before you go - CNN

The N.F.L. and Covid-19: How the League Prepared for the Super Bowl – The New York Times

February 13, 2022

Less than two months ago, the Los Angeles Rams were going through what quarterback Matthew Stafford called that tough couple weeks. As the Omicron variant of the coronavirus swept across the country, more than 30 Rams players tested positive during the last three weeks of December. At one point, nearly all of them, including seven starters, were on the reserve/Covid-19 list at the same time.

Between Dec. 12 and Jan. 8, the N.F.L. said it recorded more than 1,200 positive tests among players and team staff around the league, an average of close to 10 per club per week. The Rams Week 15 game against Seattle was one of three that were postponed because of outbreaks. The Cincinnati Bengals, the Rams opponent in Super Bowl LVI, had about 20 players go on and off the Covid-19 list in the last month of the regular season. It appeared likely the finish to the N.F.L. season would be disrupted by the coronavirus.

But with the Super Bowl finally here, what had seemed like a crisis is now a much smaller concern perhaps in part because of changes in the leagues testing policy.

The league said it had not recorded a positive test since the divisional round games. (The N.F.L.s weekly case numbers run through Feb. 5; neither the Bengals nor the Rams have announced any new cases this week.)

The reason we are here is because we have a very mature and disciplined team, Bengals Coach Zac Taylor said, referring to his players willingness to take steps to avoid infection. They have handled themselves up to this point really well, and I expect theyll do that continuing through Sunday.

Taylor said his message to his players has been that a Super Bowl parade would be more fun than any dinner out this week. Stafford described a team effort to mitigate opportunities to get sick after the December outbreak.

Other factors have converged to drive down the number of positive tests to 43 since the playoffs began, or an average of 1.5 per club per week. Zachary Binney, a sports epidemiologist at Oxford College of Emory University, said the virus burning itself out and the N.F.L. returning to enhanced protocols, including indoor mask usage for all people, were significant.

The virus moved through the league in a way that mirrored its sweep through society: Close to 70 percent of all cases recorded by the N.F.L. since the start of training camp took place during the Omicron wave, affecting about 20 percent of players and team personnel.

The N.F.L. population is highly vaccinated compared to the general public, with nearly 95 percent of players and close to 100 percent of team personnel vaccinated. The league mandated in December that coaches, front-office staff and other team employees who have direct contact with players receive a booster shot, in accordance with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But Allen Sills, the leagues chief medical officer, said this week that only about 10 percent of eligible players have been boosted. About 60 percent of people in N.F.L. team environments have been boosted, he added.

On Dec. 18, the league and players union also agreed to a major change in testing protocols, stopping weekly screening tests for vaccinated, asymptomatic people and later, in January, eliminating daily testing for unvaccinated people.

The N.F.L. billed this as a switch to targeted testing, with players and team employees screened daily for symptoms and required to take a P.C.R. test if they reported any. Sills said the goal was to detect sick people rather than random surveillance. He added that the number of cases initially went up for the two weeks after this change was implemented, before dropping off, and that more than 4,000 tests were run in the final week of the regular season.

Some experts, though, disagreed with both the change and the N.F.L.s assertion that it was rooted in public health. Stopping in mid-December makes no logical sense if youre making your decisions based on the trajectory of the pandemic, said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York. He pointed to the pandemics high-water mark in mid-January, when the nationwide daily average for new cases surged above 800,000.

The changes to testing, Binney added, may have made the Omicron spike in the N.F.L. seem to disappear sooner than it actually did, though it was already on the downslope.

I do think that was driven more by a desire to reduce disruption than it was an actual science and health-driven response, Binney said. But there is a real discussion to be had about how much we should be doing screening testing at this point, with vaccines being widely available for anyone who wants to protect themselves.

The testing protocols announced in December also called for weekly, strategic spot testing of position groups or staff members to supplement the symptomatic testing. But Sills said this week that the N.F.L. has stopped all random surveillance testing. A league spokeswoman did not give a date for when spot testing was stopped but said symptom-based testing was sufficient. Removing the extra layer of spot testing, Binney said, increases the number of cases that could have been missed.

For a player or staff member to test positive before the Super Bowl, they would have to self-report symptoms during the daily screening, which Sills said is continuing.

Some mainstay Super Bowl week events were canceled or postponed in response to Omicron, including the players unions Pitch Day competition for entrepreneurs. Players and coaches gave media interviews over video conference, with the only in-person media availability scheduled for Friday.

California announced plans this week to lift its indoor mask mandate for vaccinated people, but that will not go into effect until Tuesday, two days after the game. To attend the game, fans over the age of 5 must show proof of Covid-19 vaccination, or a negative P.C.R. test within 48 hours or a negative antigen test in the last 24 hours. All attendees over the age of 2 will be required to wear a face covering during the game, except while actively eating or drinking.

Read more:

The N.F.L. and Covid-19: How the League Prepared for the Super Bowl - The New York Times

How Tucker Carlson is trying to cash in on the Canadian coronavirus mandate protests – Longview News-Journal

February 13, 2022

CNN's Pamela Brown talks to former Fox correspondent Carl Cameron about Fox's coverage of the trucker-inspired protests against coronavirus mandates that are crippling Canadian cities and have put Ottawa under a state of emergency.

TownNews.com Content Exchange

TownNews.com Content Exchange

Originally posted here:

How Tucker Carlson is trying to cash in on the Canadian coronavirus mandate protests - Longview News-Journal

10 Alabama counties with the highest COVID-19 vaccination rate – AL.com

February 13, 2022

As the omicron surge appears to be falling in Alabama, shown by a decreased new daily COVID cases and positivity rate, the state still has one of the lowest vaccination rates in the country.

Vaccines have been readily available across the United States since 2021 and according to the Alabama Department of Public Health, there are 2,828,340 people in the state who have received one or more doses of a coronavirus vaccine. Since March 2020, the department has reported 1,262,018 cases of COVID-19, and Friday data showed the state had a 19.6% positivity rate-- or the amount of COVID tests submitted that come back positive.

Stacker compiled a list of the counties with highest COVID-19 vaccination rates in Alabama using data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and Covid Act Now. These are the 10 counties with the highest vaccination rate as of Feb. 10. Due to reporting times, the data may differ from that reported by the Alabama Department of Public Health.

Here are the 10 Alabama counties with highest COVID-19 vaccination rates. You can see the top 50 here.

1. Choctaw County

2. Madison County

3. Hale County

4. Jefferson County

5. Marengo County

6. Wilcox County

7. Bullock County

8. Montgomery County

9. Clarke County

10. Baldwin County

Go here to read the rest:

10 Alabama counties with the highest COVID-19 vaccination rate - AL.com

Norway is the latest country to discard most coronavirus restrictions – Denver Gazette

February 13, 2022

Norway is the latest country to discard most coronavirus restrictions | U.S. & World | denvergazette.com Skip to main content

You have permission to edit this article.

Norway has joined its Nordic neighbors in discarding most remaining coronavirus restrictions Saturday.

Norwegian health officials lifted the majority of restrictions on Feb. 1, and they decided Saturday that the immunity levels and low hospitalization rates were sufficient to also ditch the remaining rules requiring social distancing, masking, and self-isolation after exposure.

REPUBLICANS CRY 'UNMASK OUR KIDS' AS DEMOCRATS PIVOT FROM COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS

"This is the day we have been waiting for," Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere said during a news conference in the Norwegian capital of Oslo. "We are removing almost all coronavirus measures."

Sweden lifted most of its coronavirus rules Wednesday, ditching everything from vaccine passports to social distancing requirements and will designate COVID-19 as "not a danger to society or a threat to public health" beginning April 1. Denmark was the first European Union country to lift all restrictions on Feb. 1, deciding in January that COVID-19 "should no longer be categorized as a socially critical disease."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The United Kingdom also ended some coronavirus rules in January, including a testing requirement for vaccinated people entering the country and ending the quarantine requirements for unvaccinated travelers.

Original Location: Norway is the latest country to discard most coronavirus restrictions

Washington Examiner Videos

' + this.content + '

Read the original:

Norway is the latest country to discard most coronavirus restrictions - Denver Gazette

Thousands Of NY City Workers Could Lose Their Jobs For Refusing To Get The Coronavirus Vaccine – Forbes

February 13, 2022

Protestors opposed to Covid-19 vaccine mandates and vaccine passports by the government rally at ... [+] City Hall in New York City.

In 2021, then-Mayor Bill de Blasioenacted a series of coronavirus vaccine mandates. In July 2021, heannounced a vaccine mandate for city workers. And in December 2021, heexpanded the vaccine mandate to private-sector workers, too.

But starting January 1, 2022, New York City gota new mayor, Eric Adams. Mayor Adams has decided to keep in place former Mayor de Blasios vaccine mandate for city workers. This includes the February 11, 2022deadline to getinoculated.

Most of New Yorks city workers have gotten vaccinated, but a few thousand have not and risk losing their jobs.

New York Citys Authority to Impose the Coronavirus Vaccine Mandate

When it comes to a state or citys legal authority to impose vaccination requirements, the law is fairly well settled. Going back more than a hundred years, the U.S. Supreme Court has confirmed the authority of local governments to require its citizens to get vaccinated.

The two key casesestablishing this precedentareJacobson v. Massachusetts(from 1905) andZucht v. King(from 1922). And although the legal theories have changed somewhat since then, the overall premise of local government authority to enforce vaccine mandates is still solid law. Morerecent caseshave cometosimilar legal conclusions.However, one of the current legal questions still up to debate is the implementation ofreligious exemptions.

How Religious Exemptions Work

TheFirst Amendmentto the United States Constitution prohibits governments fromenacting laws that wouldestablish a religion or infringeon an individualsfree exercise of religion. Its this latter right that applies to religious exemptions to vaccine mandates.

The premise of someone requesting a religious exemption to a vaccine requirement is that it goes against their religious beliefs. The vast majority of religions commonly practiced in the United Statesdo not have religious tenets thatare against vaccines. Despite this, the sincerity of someones religious beliefs as theyrelate to getting vaccinated isnt usually the primary issue of contention in court.

Instead, the focus is more often on the applicability of a particular legal argument, such as whether the vaccine requirement is universally applied. Why does this matter? Because it can change how the court will approach the legality of the vaccination law.

Courts referred to these approaches as levels of judicial review. The basic idea is that the more compelling the reason the government has for a law that could restrict someones religious beliefs,and the more tailored that law is to limitingany infringement on someones religious rights, the more likely a court will uphold the law.

So if a law is universally applied to all individuals (regardless of their religious beliefs),and the government has a really good reason for enacting that law,a court will use a level of judicial review that makes it more likely the law stands.

But if a law only focuses on a particular religion or religious practice,and/or the governments reasonsfor the law arent very important,then courts will use a level of judicial review that makes it more likely the law gets struck down.

So how does this apply to vaccine mandates?Based onprior case law, its possible that a vaccine mandate that only offers a medical exemption willnotbe considered a law of universal applicability. This is because those with medical reasons can get an exemption while thosewithreligious reasonscannot. So unless thegovernment cangive a good reason forthis discrepancy, then courts will use a higher level of judicial review making iteasier to strike down the law on First Amendment grounds.

Fortunately for Mayor Adams, the NYC vaccine mandate for city workers offers both medical and religious exemptions.Therefore, itll be difficult to oppose the New York City vaccine mandate for city workers based on this universal applicability argument.

According to theNew York Times, roughly13,000 exemptions requestsfrom New York City workershave been submitted.About 2,000 have been approved, about 5,000 have beendenied and the rest are still being processed.

Another Legal Optionfor City Workers Who Refuse the Vaccine

Several New York City unionsfiled a lawsuitearlier this week challenging the potential firingsof their members. Specifically, they argue that summarily firing employees for not complying with the vaccine requirement would be a violation of theirdue process rightsbecause theyre being terminated without following the properprocedures.

However, the city argues that getting fired for not getting vaccinated is not a form of workplacediscipline and is instead a condition of employment.As a result,the summary dismissals would not be a violation of the workers due process rights.

Bottom Line

A citys right to require its workers to get vaccinated is well-settled law. Most legal challenges to worker vaccine mandates at the local level have been unsuccessful.

Two potential legal arguments against New York Citys vaccine mandate for workers could attack the law based on religious freedom and due process grounds. Butbecausethevaccinelaw has been set up so that the vaccine requirement is a condition of employment and provides both medical and religious exemptions, its unclear how successful these arguments will be.

View post:

Thousands Of NY City Workers Could Lose Their Jobs For Refusing To Get The Coronavirus Vaccine - Forbes

It Appears the Coronavirus Will Largely Spare the Super Bowl – The New York Times

February 11, 2022

Less than two months ago, the Los Angeles Rams were going through what quarterback Matthew Stafford called that tough couple weeks. As the Omicron variant of the coronavirus swept across the country, more than 30 Rams players tested positive during the last three weeks of December. At one point, nearly all of them, including seven starters, were on the reserve/Covid-19 list at the same time.

Between Dec. 12 and Jan. 8, the N.F.L. said it recorded more than 1,200 positive tests among players and team staff around the league, an average of close to 10 per club per week. The Rams Week 15 game against Seattle was one of three that were postponed because of outbreaks. The Cincinnati Bengals, the Rams opponent in Super Bowl LVI, had about 20 players go on and off the Covid-19 list in the last month of the regular season. It appeared likely the finish to the N.F.L. season would be disrupted by the coronavirus.

But with the Super Bowl just days away, what had seemed like a crisis is now a much smaller concern perhaps in part because of changes in the leagues testing policy.

The league said it had not recorded a positive test since the divisional round games. (The N.F.L.s weekly case numbers run through Feb. 5; neither the Bengals nor the Rams have announced any new cases this week.)

The reason we are here is because we have a very mature and disciplined team, Bengals Coach Zac Taylor said, referring to his players willingness to take steps to avoid infection. They have handled themselves up to this point really well, and I expect theyll do that continuing through Sunday.

Taylor said his message to his players has been that a Super Bowl parade would be more fun than any dinner out this week. Stafford described a team effort to mitigate opportunities to get sick after the December outbreak.

Other factors have converged to drive down the number of positive tests to 43 since the playoffs began, or an average of 1.5 per club per week. Zachary Binney, a sports epidemiologist at Oxford College of Emory University, said the virus burning itself out and the N.F.L. returning to enhanced protocols, including indoor mask usage for all people, were significant.

The virus moved through the league in a way that mirrored its sweep through society: Close to 70 percent of all cases recorded by the N.F.L. since the start of training camp took place during the Omicron wave, affecting about 20 percent of players and team personnel.

The N.F.L. population is highly vaccinated compared to the general public, with nearly 95 percent of players and close to 100 percent of team personnel vaccinated. The league mandated in December that coaches, front-office staff and other team employees who have direct contact with players receive a booster shot, in accordance with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But Allen Sills, the leagues chief medical officer, said this week that only about 10 percent of eligible players have been boosted. About 60 percent of people in N.F.L. team environments have been boosted, he added.

On Dec. 18, the league and players union also agreed to a major change in testing protocols, stopping weekly screening tests for vaccinated, asymptomatic people and later, in January, eliminating daily testing for unvaccinated people.

The N.F.L. billed this as a switch to targeted testing, with players and team employees screened daily for symptoms and required to take a P.C.R. test if they reported any. Sills said the goal was to detect sick people rather than random surveillance. He added that the number of cases initially went up for the two weeks after this change was implemented, before dropping off, and that more than 4,000 tests were run in the final week of the regular season.

Some experts, though, disagreed with both the change and the N.F.L.s assertion that it was rooted in public health. Stopping in mid-December makes no logical sense if youre making your decisions based on the trajectory of the pandemic, said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York. He pointed to the pandemics high-water mark in mid-January, when the nationwide daily average for new cases surged above 800,000.

The changes to testing, Binney added, may have made the Omicron spike in the N.F.L. seem to disappear sooner than it actually did, though it was already on the downslope.

I do think that was driven more by a desire to reduce disruption than it was an actual science and health-driven response, Binney said. But there is a real discussion to be had about how much we should be doing screening testing at this point, with vaccines being widely available for anyone who wants to protect themselves.

The testing protocols announced in December also called for weekly, strategic spot testing of position groups or staff members to supplement the symptomatic testing. But Sills said this week that the N.F.L. has stopped all random surveillance testing. A league spokeswoman did not give a date for when spot testing was stopped but said symptom-based testing was sufficient. Removing the extra layer of spot testing, Binney said, increases the number of cases that could have been missed.

For a player or staff member to test positive before the Super Bowl, they would have to self-report symptoms during the daily screening, which Sills said is continuing.

Some mainstay Super Bowl week events were canceled or postponed in response to Omicron, including the players unions Pitch Day competition for entrepreneurs. Players and coaches gave media interviews over video conference, with the only in-person media availability scheduled for Friday.

California announced plans this week to lift its indoor mask mandate for vaccinated people, but that will not go into effect until Tuesday, two days after the game. To attend the game, fans over the age of 5 must show proof of Covid-19 vaccination, or a negative P.C.R. test within 48 hours or a negative antigen test in the last 24 hours. All attendees over the age of 2 will be required to wear a face covering during the game, except while actively eating or drinking.

See more here:

It Appears the Coronavirus Will Largely Spare the Super Bowl - The New York Times

COVID-19: Top news stories about the pandemic on 11 February | World Economic Forum – World Economic Forum

February 11, 2022

Confirmed cases of COVID-19 have passed 406 million globally, according to Johns Hopkins University. The number of confirmed deaths has now passed 5.79 million. More than 10.3 billion vaccination doses have been administered globally, according to Our World in Data.

Australian residents will need to receive booster shots to be considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19. However, authorities have said foreign travellers will continue to only need two jabs to enter the country.

Novavax announced yesterday that its two-dose COVID-19 vaccine was 80% effective against the virus in a late-stage trial with teens aged 12-17 years.

The Dutch government has announced its aim to drop most of its COVID-19 restrictions by the end of February, after record infection levels in recent weeks had only a limited effect on hospital numbers.

Spain has lifted a requirement to wear face masks outside as COVID-19 cases continue to recede from record highs.

The Czech government has ended requirements that required vaccination certificates to enter restaurants and events.

Pfizer's oral COVID-19 drug has been approved by a Japanese Health Ministry committee.

The BA.2 subvariant of Omicron is now the dominant COVID-19 variant in South Africa - and has been detected in multiple other African countries - the director of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said yesterday.

Daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases per million people in selected countries.

Image: Our World in Data

The COVID Response Alliance to Social Entrepreneurs - soon to continue its work as the Global Alliance for Social Entrepreneurship - was launched in April 2020 in response to the devastating effects of the pandemic. Co-founded by the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship together with Ashoka, Echoing Green, GHR Foundation, Skoll Foundation, and Yunus Social Business.

The Alliance provides a trusted community for the worlds leading corporations, investors, governments, intermediaries, academics, and media who share a commitment to social entrepreneurship and innovation.

Since its inception, it has since grown to become the largest multi-stakeholder coalition in the social enterprise sector: its 90+ members collectively support over 100,000 social entrepreneurs across the world. These entrepreneurs, in turn, have a direct or indirect impact on the lives of an estimated 2 billion people.

Together, they work to (i) mobilize support for social entrepreneurs and their agendas; (ii) take action on urgent global agendas using the power of social entrepreneurship, and (iii) share insights from the sector so that social entrepreneurs can flourish and lead the way in shaping an inclusive, just and sustainable world.

The Alliance works closely together with member organizations Echoing Green and GHR Foundation, as well as the Centre for the New Economy and Society on the roll out of its 2022 roadmap (soon to be announced).

Africa is transitioning out of the pandemic phase of the COVID-19 outbreak and moving towards a situation where it will be managing the virus over the long term, the head of the World Health Organization on the continent said yesterday.

"I believe that we are transitioning from the pandemic phase and we will now need to manage the presence of this virus in the long term," Dr Matshidiso Moeti told a regular online media briefing.

She also said that the WHO estimates the total number of COVID-19 infections in Africa could be up to seven times higher than official data suggests, and deaths could be two to three times higher.

"We're very much aware that our surveillance systems problems that we had on the continent, with access to testing supplies, for example, have led to an underestimation of the cases," Moeti said.

Germany's daily rise in the number of COVID-19 infections is slowing, data from the Robert Koch Institute showed yesterday, indicating that a fourth wave of the pandemic could flatten soon.

Germany reported 247,862 new daily coronavirus cases on Thursday, up 5% from the same day last week. The 7-day infection incidence per 100,000 people also rose to 1,465 from 1,451 a day earlier.

Germany's adjusted hospitalization rate rose only slightly to 10.96 per 100,000 people from 10.88 a day earlier.

Germany's coronavirus wave is expected to peak around mid-February, the health minister said last month. The number of cases stabilizing means the country could start discussing easing national restrictions.

Written by

Joe Myers, Writer, Formative Content

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and not the World Economic Forum.

See the rest here:

COVID-19: Top news stories about the pandemic on 11 February | World Economic Forum - World Economic Forum

Are we overcounting COVID-19 deaths? – Medical News Today

February 11, 2022

In slightly more than 2 years, authorities have recorded 5.75 million COVID-19 deaths worldwide. Some people believe that this is an overestimate of the actual mortality from the disease. Others think COVID-19 has caused many more deaths than the official figures show. Medical News Today has looked at the evidence and spoken with experts to uncover the truth behind the numbers.

As the COVID-19 pandemic enters its third year, there are reasons for optimism.

Firstly, vaccines are reducing the number of deaths, at least in those countries where vaccination is widely available.

Secondly, evidence is growing that the latest variant, Omicron, causes less severe disease than previous variants. One study in California has shown a significantly lower risk of death with Omicron than with Delta, although the paper has yet to undergo peer review.

However, the global death toll has been enormous, with official figures placing it at more than 5.75 million. Of these deaths, more than 900,000 have occurred in the United States.

Some people dispute these numbers, claiming that COVID-19 did not actually cause many of the deaths for which the authorities held it responsible. So how are these deaths being counted?

Most countries record every death and its cause, providing a permanent legal record. In the United Kingdom, the guidelines on how to complete the medical certificate of cause of death run to several pages.

The doctor who records the death must note the primary cause of death and any contributing factors on the death certificate. And therein lies the problem.

COVID-19 can lead to multiple problems pneumonia, respiratory failure, blood clots, stroke, and heart attack any of which might cause death. And most of those who die after contracting COVID-19 have one or more comorbidities.

So, how many people have died of COVID-19, and how many have died with COVID-19?

Consider the example of an 86-year-old man in a care home with late stage dementia and coronary artery disease (CAD). He contracts COVID-19 but has few symptoms. Then, he dies. What was the primary cause of death?

One doctor might record dementia as the primary cause, with CAD and COVID-19 as contributing factors. Another might decide that COVID-19 was the primary cause as, without contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the man might have lived for a few more weeks with the other two conditions.

Dr. William Schaffner, professor of infectious diseases at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, TN, agreed that the actual cause of death can be hard to determine. Deaths are, to a degree, imprecise, he said to MNT. A physician must make a judgment of cause of death.

Whether the man died of COVID-19 or with COVID-19 is open to interpretation. And this is why some dispute the official figures.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a death from COVID-19 as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID-19 disease, e.g., trauma.

The U.S. attributes death to COVID-19 where this disease, or the coronavirus that causes it, appears as a cause or contributing cause of death on the death certificate.

The U.K. records any death that occurs within 28 days of a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 as a COVID-19 death. The official U.K. COVID-19 death toll is now about 159,000.

However, a video that people have widely shared on social media has stated that the true number of COVID-19 deaths in the U.K. is 17,000 just over one-tenth of the official number. This is the number of people for whom COVID-19 was the only recorded cause of death. Some people believe that this is the number that the government should publicize.

Similarly, in the U.S., CDC data showed that COVID-19 was the sole cause of only about 5% of listed COVID-19 deaths. These data led to the former U.S. president, Donald Trump, claiming on social media that the published figures were greatly exaggerating the severity of COVID-19.

When doctors determine that COVID-19 is not the sole cause of death, they record other causes on the death certificate. In the U.S., at least 90% of such recorded deaths had COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death rather than a contributing cause.

So although we could say that all of these people died with COVID-19 and not of COVID-19, the disease almost certainly played a role in their deaths.

One way of avoiding this issue is to record excess deaths during the pandemic and attribute these to COVID-19, rather than looking at how many people had COVID-19 on their death certificate. However, this approach has its own problems.

Experts calculate the excess death rate by comparing figures for a given period with the average for that same period over several previous years. So, a person looking for excess deaths in January 2022 might compare the deaths in that month with the January average for, say, the past 10 years.

The problem with counting excess deaths, though, is that it does not take into account changes in populations. In many countries, populations are getting older.

In 2000, over-65s accounted for approximately 1 in 8 people in both Europe and the U.S. By 2020, more than one-fifth of Europeans were over the age of 65 years, and people in this age bracket made up one-seventh of the U.S. population. And these numbers are increasing rapidly.

As populations get older, more people die. So, comparing the death rates in 2021 with those from previous years might give a skewed perspective. Some of those excess deaths would have occurred without the pandemic.

In addition, deaths from some causes, such as infectious diseases, have decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic due to lockdowns and physical distancing. This will affect the excess deaths figure.

Despite misgivings from some quarters, most experts believe that COVID-19 deaths are not being overcounted. Indeed, many think that undercounting is more likely, particularly in the early months of the pandemic.

Early on, there was not widespread testing, so we underestimated the deaths. Now, the death data are more reliable. There may be some plus or minus, but death data are pretty accurate.

Dr. William Schaffner

Dr. Arturo Casadevall, a distinguished professor and chair of molecular microbiology and immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, echoed this view.

My view is that the current number of COVID-19 deaths is an undercounting simply because those deaths reflect the ones we know about, and not every death caused by this disease was recorded or diagnosed as such, he told MNT.

Higher income countries record all deaths, noting the causes on the death certificate. This is not the case worldwide.

The problem of unrecorded deaths is particularly acute in low and middle income countries. When a death is unrecorded, only those who witness the death may know its cause.

In India, the WHO has recorded more than 500,000 deaths due to COVID-19, but household surveys and statistical models suggest that the number could be as much as 10 times higher. Without good data on deaths and births, the COVID-19 death toll can never be certain.

The true death toll of COVID-19 may not be known for many years. Many experts also believe that the final numbers should also include those who died not with COVID-19 but because of it.

The number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 does not include other deaths associated with the pandemic, such as those caused by the absence of proper care for other conditions because the healthcare system was focused on COVID-19, and much routine care such as cancer screening was slowed or postponed.

Dr. Arturo Casadevall

While the pandemic continues, it will be difficult to get a true figure for global deaths. Death data are a lagging indicator. They are pretty reliable, but it takes longer for people to die and the data to be collected, Dr. Schaffner cautioned.

However long it takes for the true figures to emerge, the COVID-19 pandemic has inflicted, and continues to inflict, an appalling global death toll. And it is becoming clear that the figures are almost certainly underreported, as Dr. Casadevall explained:

I think that in coming years, we will see revisions to this number with higher estimates of total deaths as we come to better understand the toll of this calamity.

For live updates on the latest developments regarding COVID-19, click here.

See the article here:

Are we overcounting COVID-19 deaths? - Medical News Today

Page 402«..1020..401402403404..410420..»