Category: Corona Virus

Page 361«..1020..360361362363..370380..»

Army lieutenant convicted in court-martial but not punished for refusing coronavirus prevention orders – Stars and Stripes

May 5, 2022

Army 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw, an entomologist, was found guilty in a court-martial Friday of failing to follow orders meant to prevent the spread of coronavirus at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md. Col. Robert Cohen, the judge in the case, did not issue punishment. (Facebook)

Stars and Stripes is making stories on the coronavirus pandemic available free of charge. See more storieshere. Sign up for our daily coronavirus newsletterhere. Please support our journalismwith a subscription.

An Army lieutenant was convicted in a court-martial for failing to comply with orders related to coronavirus prevention efforts in his units offices at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., according to base officials.

However, the judge in the case declined to punish 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw for his actions.

The court-martial concluded Friday in Col. Robert Cohens courtroom within the 1st Judicial Circuit, according to the Armys online court records. Bashaw pleaded not guilty.

The charges stem from Bashaws actions on Nov. 30 when he failed to obey orders meant to prevent the spread of coronavirus, which violates Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, said Amburr Reese, a spokeswoman for the base.

The charge, issued Jan. 12, carried three counts, two of which were combined during the court-martial, the Army said. Bashaw, an entomologist, was wrongfully present at his place of duty after failing to submit a negative coronavirus test or submitting to a test prior to reporting to work. He then wrongfully remained at his place of duty. He also wrongfully failed to obey an order to wear a mask indoors.

At that time, Bashaw knew the captain in command of Army Public Health Center Headquarters Company had issued an order to telework until providing a negative coronavirus test, according to a summary of Bashaws charge sheet.

"After a careful consideration of the evidence, a military judge exercised lawful authority not to adjudge punishment for 1st Lt. Mark Bashaw, Reese said. Receiving no punishment at a court-martial is not without precedent.

It was unclear Wednesday whether Bashaw has been vaccinated against the coronavirus.

He joined the Army in 2019 after having previously served in the Air Force, according to his official service record. His awards include the Meritorious Service Medal, the Air Force Commendation Medal with two oak leaf clusters, the Air Force Achievement Medal with three oak leaf clusters, the Air Force Meritorious Unit Award and the Air Force National Service Medal.

His Air Force records were not immediately available.

The conviction will be included in Bashaws military record, which is reviewed during promotions and job placements.

Reese said the federal conviction alone carries lifelong collateral consequences, including social consequences and difficulty in obtaining future employment, as criminal convictions are generally public information and frequently reported in federal and state criminal and licensing databases.

Aberdeen Proving Ground is located northeast of Baltimore and has about 21,000 military, civilian and contract employees, according to the base website.

Originally posted here:

Army lieutenant convicted in court-martial but not punished for refusing coronavirus prevention orders - Stars and Stripes

Testing Positive for the Coronavirus Overseas: What You Need to Know – The New York Times

May 3, 2022

Im positive! Do I need to self-isolate or quarantine?

If you test positive, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends you should isolate and delay travel for 10 days, regardless of symptoms or a negative test taken within the isolation period. The country where you are staying may have its own rules for quarantine and isolation. The rules differ from country to country and isolation periods may be longer than the 10 days recommended by the C.D.C. Across Europe, many countries follow guidance from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, which recommends that fully vaccinated people should self-isolate after testing positive. If their symptoms improve and they feel better for at least 24 hours and they test negative for the virus twice within a 24-hour period, they can stop isolating. Or, if after six days they test negative once, they can stop isolating. Unvaccinated people are advised to self-isolate for 10 days, but can leave isolation if they meet the same requirements for negative tests.

Some other destinations, particularly in Asia, may require mandatory quarantine or isolation in a government facility or designated hotel for 14 days or more.

This will depend on the regulations in the country you are visiting, so be sure to check what they say on local health ministry websites. In most places, tourists are not required to officially report a positive test result to the government, although if you took your test in person at a local health facility, the results are often sent to the regional or national health authority.

Most countries, including popular European destinations like Greece, Italy and France, allow visitors testing positive to choose their own accommodation for the recommended period of self-isolation. You can find this information on U.S. embassy websites. If you have booked a hotel or Airbnb for your trip, it is worth calling ahead of time and seeing what their policy is for isolation and whether they have availability should you need to extend your stay.

Some lodging facilities will require you to isolate alone in a separate room, even if your family members or travel companions test negative. You should also ask about access to food and medical facilities, particularly if you are staying in a remote area.

Its useful to have a plan B in place in case your hotel or rental cannot accommodate you, or to have a cheaper option available if you do have to self-isolate for 10 days. Many countries have designated quarantine hotels or apartments and some resorts in popular tourist destinations like Spain, Portugal and Mexico allow guests to quarantine at a discounted rate.

While most people are likely to test negative within 10 days of a positive coronavirus test, for some it can take weeks or even months, according to the global health partnership Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. If you find yourself in that position, and feel well enough to travel, you can return to the United States but will need to obtain documentation of recovery.

More here:

Testing Positive for the Coronavirus Overseas: What You Need to Know - The New York Times

Newer, fitter descendants of Omicron variant begin to drive their own coronavirus waves – CNN

May 3, 2022

Cases are trending up in most states, and have increased by more than 50% compared with the previous week in Washington, Mississippi, Georgia, Maine, Hawaii, South Dakota, Nevada and Montana. In New York, more than a quarter of the state's population is in a county with a "high" Covid-19 community level, where the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends indoor masking.

Average daily hospitalizations are up about 10% since last week, according to data collected by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

The culprit this time appears to be a spinoff of Omicron's BA.2 subvariant called BA.2.12.1, which was first flagged by New York state health officials in April.

BA.2.12.1, which is growing about 25% faster than its parent virus, BA.2, accounts for nearly 37% all Covid-19 cases around the US, according to new estimates from the CDC.

BA.2 caused an estimated 62% of all Covid-19 cases last week, down from 70% the week before.

US, South Africa contend with faster new variants

BA.2.12.1 isn't the only Omicron offshoot that scientists are watching.

After weeks of declines, South Africa recently saw its Covid-19 cases rise steeply in the last two weeks. Test positivity and hospitalizations have also popped up, as scientists have watched two relatively new subvariants, BA.4 and BA.5 now dominate transmission in that country. Taken together they accounted for almost 60% of all new Covid-19 cases by the end of April, according to South Africa's National Institute of Communicable Diseases.

These new Omicron subvariants are spreading around the globe. BA.4 sequences have been reported in 15 countries and 10 US states, while BA.5 has been picked up in 13 countries and five US states, according to the website Outbreak.info, which maintained by a coalition of academic research centers and is supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health.

Like BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 have a growth advantage over BA.2.

Omicron subvariants escape immunity

Researchers in South Africa tested the ability of antibodies in blood to disable BA.4 and BA.5 viruses in a lab. In people who were unvaccinated, but recently recovered from a BA.1 infection, they saw a more than 7-fold drop in the ability of their antibodies to neutralize BA.4 and BA.5 viruses. In people who'd been vaccinated, but recently had a breakthrough infection caused by BA.1, the drops were smaller, about 3-fold lower.

By way of comparison, the World Health Organization uses an 8-fold drop in neutralization as the threshold for the loss of protection that requires an update to seasonal influenza vaccines.

The study results led the researchers to write that "BA.4 and BA.5 have potential to result in a new infection wave," making Covid-19 vaccinations and booster shots crucial to stopping the next wave.

"Our conclusions from this are first, that Omicron, by itself is not a great vaccine, right?" said Alex Sigal, a virologist at the Africa Health Research Institute who led the study. "Just because you were infected does not mean you have a lot of protection from what's coming next."

Dr. Eric Topol, a cardiologist who is the founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute praised the research, pointing out that this lab was also the first to characterize the first Omicron variant: "They've been first rate all the way through the pandemic."

He said overall the finding was not good news. Even people who recovered from a Covid-19 infection as recently as December or January can be reinfected by these new subvariants.

"That drop off of immune escape or immune evasion was pronounced in people who were unvaccinated," Topol said, pointing out that only about 1 in 3 people in South Africa have been vaccinated against Covid-19.

For those who are vaccinated "Those people are also not as bad, but they also have to face BA.4 and BA.5 with less solid neutralizing antibody response," he said. "The mutations in BA.4 and BA.5 are playing out to be a challenge to our immune response," he said.

Researchers say it's just too early to know if BA.4 or BA.5 will take off in the United States. So far, only a few dozen sequences of these viruses have been reported in the US and Canada.

It wouldn't be surprising if they do, said Andy Pekosz, a virologist and professor of molecular microbiology and immunology at Johns Hopkins University.

"We've seen this over and over again. As a variant becomes dominant in another country eventually ends up here in the US and spreading globally," Pekosz said.

In the meantime, Topol said, we have our own sublineage to deal with, BA.2.12.1.

"It may simulate the problems of BA.4 and BA.5," Topol said. "We don't know yet because there's no study like this one from the Sigal lab."

Shared mutation

BA.4 and BA.5 viruses and BA.2.12.1 have mutations at location 452 of their genomes. This region codes for a part of the viruses receptor binding domain -- the part of the virus that docks onto a door on the outside of our cells. The Delta variant and some others have picked up mutations in this location. Researchers believe changes there help the virus bind more tightly to our cells and hide from frontline immune defenders called antibodies that try to block the virus from invading our cells.

"That may make it transmit better perhaps between our cells as well," Sigal said in an interview with CNN.

BA.4 and BA.5 also have changes at location 486, which is a bit of a head-scratcher since previous viruses that changed in this location didn't do well. They fizzled out.

"Suddenly, this guy manages it. So we don't know what that does," Sigal said. "My suspicion is that's a heavy escape mutation," he said, meaning that it helps the virus hide from our immune system.

Scientists have begun work to try to better understand BA.2.12.1, which has been detected in 22 countries, though most of the sequences have come from the United States.

Pekosz said he has been growing copies of BA.2.12.1 in his lab and has recently shipped samples of the virus to other research groups for study. He said scientists have just started talking about experiments they want to do to try to answer two key questions: How quickly is it copying itself, and how well does it escape our immunity?

Before the SARS-CoV2 virus, scientists thought coronaviruses didn't change much. Pekosz said looking back, we didn't know what we didn't know.

As long as the virus continues to find hosts to infect, it will continue to evolve.

"This virus has shown that it mutated slowly, but when it started to pick up good mutations, they just kept coming and coming and coming," he said.

Read more here:

Newer, fitter descendants of Omicron variant begin to drive their own coronavirus waves - CNN

Maine reports 1198 new cases of COVID-19 as new virus strains spread through region – Press Herald

May 3, 2022

Maine reported 1,198 new cases of COVID-19 on Tuesday and four additional deaths, as additional omicron subvariants have been detected in the state.

The seven-day average of daily new cases has more than tripled during the past month, going from 199.3 on April 1 to 638.1 on Tuesday.

Hospitalizations also rose again on Tuesday to a total of 162 patients statewide, a 60 percent increase in two weeks.

The surge in cases in Maine is similar to whats happening in other states in the Northeast, where the omicron subvariant BA.2 and other new subvariants are driving up infection rates. New more contagious strains of the omicron BA.2 subvariant have spread through the region and in Maine, data show.

Were still receiving more positive test results each day, reflective of increased transmission, said Robert Long, Maine CDC spokesman, in a statement. Wastewater screening and hospitalizations also indicate that we are in a period of increased transmission, which is consistent with what other jurisdictions saw with the omicron subvariants.

Case counts have risen most dramatically in the Northeast, with the more contagious BA.2.12 and BA.2.12.1 omicron subvariants fueling increases, especially in New York. Those are closely related to the omicron BA.2 subvariant and, like BA.2, are highly transmissable but less likely to cause sever illness than earlier versions of the coronavirus.

The most recent genomic sequencing report in Maine, released on April 25 by the Maine CDC, shows that the BA.2.12.1 omicron subvariant and other subvariants made up about 30 percent of samples tested, with BA.2 representing about 50 percent and the original BA.1 omicron variant about 20 percent of samples.

The U.S. CDC says BA.2.12.1 is about 25 percent more transmissible than BA.2.

COVID-19 hospitalizations patients increased from 150 on Monday to 162 on Tuesday, with 30 in critical care and three on a ventilator. Hospitalizations are still far below the Jan. 13 peak of 436.

About 67 percent of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 since vaccines became readily available last year have been unvaccinated. While vaccines continue to protect against serious illness in most cases, that percentage has decreased because the number of people who lack immunity from either vaccination or a previous infection has declined.

Among new hospital admissions reported to the state from April 16-26 for which the vaccination status was noted, 55 percent were unvaccinated and 45 percent were vaccinated.

On Monday, MaineHealth reported that 44 of its 57 current COVID-19 hospital patients are vaccinated. MaineHealth is the parent organization of Maine Medical Center in Portland and seven other Maine hospitals.

Public health officials say the higher percentage of vaccinated COVID patients being hospitalized doesnt mean the vaccines are any less effective. It merely reflects that the number of unvaccinated Maine residents that havent been infected is now a smaller percentage of the state population than it was last spring and summer.

About 75 percent of Maine residents are now fully vaccinated, and 90 percent of people age 60 and older, the population group most likely to need hospitalization.

Vaccinated patients who require hospitalization tend to be older adults with weakened immune systems related to other conditions. Health officials continue to recommend that people in these groups get a second booster shot to maximize their immunity.

Also, many Maine residents who are not vaccinated have already contracted COVID-19 and have some natural immunity. The U.S. CDC reported last week that about 35 percent of Maines population has contracted COVID-19 at some point during the pandemic, with most of the infections occurring since September 2021.

Since the pandemic began, Maine has recorded 247,069 cases of COVID-19, and 2,291 deaths.

Invalid username/password.

Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Previous

Next

The rest is here:

Maine reports 1198 new cases of COVID-19 as new virus strains spread through region - Press Herald

Dallas County Reports a Total of 344 New Positive 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases and 8 Deaths, Including 146 Probable Cases and 216 New Cases…

May 3, 2022

To date, a total of 2,575 cases with SARS-CoV-2 variants have been identified and investigated in residents of Dallas County, including 288 cases of B.1.1.7 (Alpha); 4 cases of B.1.351 (Beta); 1,851 cases of B.1.617.2 (Delta); 31 cases of B.1.427 (Epsilon); 29 cases of P.1 (Gamma); 15 cases of B.1.526 (Iota); 5 cases of C.37 (Lambda); 4 cases of B.1.621 (Mu); 343 cases of B.1.1.529 (Omicron); and 3 cases of P.2 (Zeta). Four hundred and forty-five cases have been hospitalized and 63 have died. Forty-nine COVID-19 variant cases were reinfections. Seven hundred and twenty-five people were considered fully vaccinated before infection with a COVID-19 variant.

As of 4/29/2022, a total of 645 confirmed and probable cases were reported in CDC week 16 (week ending 4/23/22), which is a weekly rate of 24.5 new cases per 100,000 residents.

As of the week ending 4/23/2022, about 81% of Dallas County residents age 12 years and older have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, including 99% of residents age 65 years and older; 87% of residents between 40-64 years of age; 79% of residents 25-39 years of age; 68% of residents 18-24 years of age; and 63% of residents 12-17 years of age. In the cities of Addison, Coppell, Highland Park, Irving, and Sunnyvale, greater than 94% of residents 18 years of age and older have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. In the cities of Cedar Hill, Desoto, Farmers Branch, Garland, Lancaster, and University Park, greater than 81% of residents 18 years of age and older have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

About 47.8% of COVID-19 cases diagnosed in Week 16 were Dallas County residents who were not fully vaccinated. In Dallas County, 60,005 cases of COVID-19 breakthrough COVID-19 infections in fully vaccinated individuals have been confirmed to date, of which 4,019 (6.7%) were hospitalized and 726 have died due to COVID-19.

Of all Dallas County residents tested for COVID-19 by PCR during the week ending 4/23/2022 (CDC week 16), 5.8% of respiratory specimens tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. For week 15, area hospital labs have continued to report elevated numbers and proportions of respiratory specimens that are positive for other respiratory viruses by molecular tests: parainfluenza (6.02 %), rhinovirus/enterovirus (20.22 %), and RSV (3.69%).

There are currently 11 active long-term care facility outbreaks. A cumulative total of 6,479 residents and 4,364 healthcare workers in long-term facilities in Dallas have been diagnosed with COVID-19. Of these, 1,338 have been hospitalized and 911 have died. About 16% of all deaths reported to date have been associated with long-term care facilities.

There has been 1 outbreak of COVID-19 in a congregate-living facility (e.g. homeless shelters, group homes, and halfway homes) reported within the past 30 days. A cumulative total of 1,135 residents and staff members (840 residents and 295 staff) in congregate-living facilities in Dallas have been diagnosed with COVID-19.

New cases are being reported as a daily aggregate, with more detailed data dashboards and summary reports updated on Friday evenings, available at: https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/2019-novel-coronavirus/daily-updates.php.

Local health experts use hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and ER visits as three of the key indicators as part of determining the COVID-19 Risk Level (color-coded risk) and corresponding guidelines for activities during our COVID-19 response. The most recent COVID-19 hospitalization data for Dallas County, as reported to the North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council, can be found at http://www.dallascounty.org/covid-19 under Monitoring Data, and is updated regularly. This data includes information on the total available ICU beds, suspected and confirmed COVID-19 ER visits in the last 24 hours, confirmed COVID-19 inpatients, and COVID-19 deaths by actual date of death. The most recent forecasting from UTSW can be found here.The most recent COVID-19 Data Summaries for Dallas County, TX can be found at the bottom of this page.

Read the original post:

Dallas County Reports a Total of 344 New Positive 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases and 8 Deaths, Including 146 Probable Cases and 216 New Cases...

Only 1 in 4 COVID-19 patients feel fully recovered after hospital stay – Medical News Today

May 3, 2022

There are still many unknowns surrounding COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, or the duration of persistent symptoms experienced with long COVID.

Researchers in the U.K. recently published a study in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine that followed more than 2,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. After having one year to recover following being released from the hospital, roughly only 25% of patients felt like they were completely back to their usual, healthy selves.

Long COVID is the term that describes experiencing COVID-19-related symptoms that last for an extended period of time. Often also called post-COVID syndrome or chronic COVID, people who experience this condition may sometimes be referred to as long-haulers.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), long COVID refers to a wide range of new, returning, or ongoing health problems people can experience four or more weeks after first being infected with the virus that causes COVID-19.

Some symptoms the CDC mentions people with long COVID may experience include:

Long COVID is prevalent enough that it can be recognized as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The researchers started with a group of 2,320 participants who were discharged from the hospital between March 7, 2020, and April 18, 2021. All participants were originally hospitalized due to COVID-19-related illnesses.

The participants followed up with their doctors 5 months after being released from the hospital to have their symptoms assessed.

The patients completed questionnaires about anxiety, depression, fatigue, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other health issues. Doctors also tested the participants cognitive abilities and pulmonary function.

The researchers assigned participants to four clusters depending on the severity of their physical and mental health symptoms: very severe, severe, moderate, and mild. Half of the participants fell into the very severe and severe clusters.

Of the participants who completed their 5-month follow-up, 807 completed a 1-year follow-up appointment. The majority reported not feeling recovered from COVID-19.

At the 5-month follow-up, 25.5% of the patients reported feeling fully recovered. Of the participants who came back for a 1-year follow-up, 28.9% felt fully recovered, which is an improvement of only roughly 10%.

The researchers found that many of the people who were on mechanical ventilators in the hospital did not feel fully recovered after 1 year.

Additionally, the prevalence of not being back to full health was higher among females and participants with obesity.

The limited recovery from 5 months to 1 year after hospitalization in our study across symptoms, mental health, exercise capacity, organ impairment, and quality-of-life is striking, writes lead author Dr. Rachael Evans, clinical associate professor and honorary consultant respiratory physician at the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom.

She also notes that females and people with obesity may need higher intensity interventions such as supervised rehabilitation.

While the authors write that the mechanisms behind long COVID are unknown, they hypothesize that the hyper inflammation associated with COVID-19 dysregulates the immune system.

Our findings of persistent systemic inflammation, particularly in those in the very severe and moderate with cognitive impairment clusters, suggest that these groups might respond to anti-inflammatory strategies, says Professor Louise Wain, one of the study authors and professor in the Department of Health Sciences at the University of Leicester.

Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, the director of Clinical Epidemiology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, spoke about long COVID in a Show Me the Science podcast. Of the issues long COVID patients experienced, Dr. Al-Aly noted, at least one is related to inflammation.

Were starting now to uncover long-term consequences of COVID-19 that literally will last a lifetime, Dr. Al-Aly said.

And then we did work to delve deeper into the cardiovascular manifestationsthats the heart manifestations, mental health disorders, kidney disorders, and now, most recently, diabetes, Dr. Al-Aly commented. Inflammation is a known contributing factor in developing type 2 diabetes.

We think that this is really a consequential problem. Its going to affect millions and millions of people. And our health systems should be equipped to be able to deal with it, continued Dr. Al-Aly.

Dr. Claire Taylor, a physician and neuroscientist who formerly worked for the M.E. Trust in the U.K., spoke with Medical News Today about the study.

We are severely lacking in tests to objectively show that people have not fully recovered and what is driving that, she said.

Additionally, Dr. Taylor said she found the inflammatory issues with long COVID patients concerning. However, she expressed hope that the blood tests performed in this study will open up an avenue for other blood tests to show ongoing inflammation in long COVID patients.

See the rest here:

Only 1 in 4 COVID-19 patients feel fully recovered after hospital stay - Medical News Today

The elitist coverage of the Correspondents’ Dinner and the coronavirus – Columbia Journalism Review

May 3, 2022

On Saturday nightfollowing three blissful years without one and weeks of over-the-top media hype about its returnthe White House Correspondents Dinner made its post-covid comeback. President Biden spokea departure, we were told far too many times, from his predecessors no-showsas did The Daily Shows Trevor Noah, the first comedian to host the event since Michelle Wolfs (barely) edgy 2018 speech offended the prim sensibilities of many White House reporters. Both men made jokes about the pandemic, amid other targets. This is the first time a president attended this dinner in six years, Biden said. We had a horrible plague followed by two years of covid. Noah said he was honored to be hosting the nations most distinguished superspreader event, before asking did none of you learn anything from the Gridiron Dinner? The second someone offers you a free dinner you all turn into Joe Rogan.

The covid context was always likely to loom large, but the aforementioned Gridiron event, which itself returned from a three-year hiatus in early April (and is even yuckier than the Correspondents Dinner), supercharged matters; more than eighty guests subsequently tested positive, including numerous reporters. Last week, Anthony FauciBidens top covidadviser, who attended the Gridirondecided to skip the Correspondents Dinner, citing a personal risk calculation. (Fauci thought it was too dangerous to come tonight, Noah said onstage. Pete Davidson thinks its okay, and we all went with Pete.) All this raised questions as to whether the Correspondents Dinner should be canceled or whether Biden ought to go, and under what circumstances; some health experts said that his attendance would be overly risky given his responsibility to the nation to stay healthy, though others were more positive about his presence and the event in general, arguing that Biden should show Americans how to live alongside the virus. Ultimately, the organizers strengthened their rules to demand a same-day negative test as well as proof of vaccination (they turned down a chance to install germicidal UV lights), while Biden wore a mask when he wasnt talking and took a pass on the eating portion of the event.

New from CJR: 2022 is already the deadliest year for journalists in Mexico

Like Noah, Biden addressed the debate around holding the Correspondents Dinner at the dinner itself. I know there are questions about whether we should gather here tonight because of covid, he said. Well, were here to show the country that were getting through this pandemic. Apparently, members of his administration have recently sounded far less sanguine behind the scenes following a spike in reported covid cases, both nationally and in Washington, where several high-profile politicians have been affected. The cabinet secretaries Merrick Garland, Gina Raimondo, and Tom Vilsack all tested positive post-Gridiron (as, a week later, did Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City); last week, Kate Bedingfield, the White House communications director, and, most notably, Vice President Kamala Harris both reported cases. All said that they had mild or no symptoms. Headlines and push alerts about their diagnoses rained down regardless.

After the Gridiron, in particular, this type of coverage irked the White House: according to Alexander Nazaryan, of Yahoo News, officials saw reporters focus on a handful of largely asymptomatic cases among members of the political elite as coming at the expense of a much more important story about the administrations requests for more covid funds stalling out in Congress, with the White House calculating that Jen Psaki, the press secretary, faced fewer than half as many questions about funding (ten) in the entire first week of April as about safety protocols around Biden (twenty-one) at a single briefing on April 7. At the same briefing, Psaki frustratedly waved around the administrations pandemic preparedness plan and offered reporters a copy. Around the same time, she did likewise with a thick binder detailing how past covid funds were spent, amid Republican complaints about a lack of transparency. Stats Rachel Cohrs said that she was the only reporter to take Psaki up on her offer. When she did so, officials refused her a copy, instead allowing her an hour with the binder under supervision.

This, obviously, was intensely hypocritical. More generally, covid infections among senior officials are newsworthyisolation affects their duties and covid remains a dangerous disease, especially for unvaccinated, immunocompromised, and older people; take these factors together, and Bidens exposure clearly matters. Debates like the one around whether, and how, to hold the Correspondents Dinner, meanwhile, can feed into more broadly relevant societal conversations about risk calculations at this stage of the pandemic.

Often, though, the tenor of such coverageand, particularly where the Correspondents Dinner has been concerned, its volumehas been disproportionate, sometimes absurdly so. A powerful person getting infected isnt necessarily that big a story if their symptoms arent debilitating and, as has been the case with the names in the spotlight recently, they are vaccinated, sometimes quadruply so; were nowhere near the level, so far, of the time Trump went to the hospital in 2020. More importantly, and more to the White Houses post-Gridiron gripe, focusing on elites can lessen focus elsewherein this case, on funding interventions, from testing to vaccines, that are urgently needed by medically vulnerable people in particular, both in the US and globally. Throughout the pandemic, media coverage has often, if by no means always, framed avoiding infection as a matter of personal responsibility. This approach has always been deeply flawed, and it remains so. As federal covid funds dry up, programs that have supported hospitals and the uninsured are withering. The idea that the Correspondents Dinner is in any way more important than that is shameful.

We have seen plenty of coverage of the funding stakes. Much of it, though, has focused on Washington politicking at the expense of the bigger picture. At this (hopefully) late stage of the pandemic, the press shouldnt be limiting our lens to the scope of congressional will, but rather working to convene a much broader debate not only around covid, but healthcare policy more generally, not least the urgent need to end medical racism and the many other glaring inequities and flaws in the system. Again, some journalists are working to do this; yesterday morning, to cite just one example, a story about funding for the uninsured was higher up the New York Times homepage than the Correspondents Dinner. But its hard to conclude that this has added up to an urgent, agenda-shaping national conversation. Other big stories, not least the war in Ukraine, have recently sapped much of our bandwidth on that front, and thats understandable. But it also underscores just how few distractions we can collectively afford to indulgeand distraction is a perfect word for the Correspondents Dinner.

Not all of the coverage of the dinner was elitist; Axioss Paige Hopkins, among others, drew attention to the disparity in covid requirements between guests and the staff members serving them, flipping the script to shine a light on one close-to-home example of covid inequality. Much of the dinner discourse, though, was circus-like and incestuous. Of course, as I and many others have written before, the dinner didnt need covid to come along to be accused of that; as the Democratic strategist turned pundit David Axelrod told the Times ahead of the event, there is a question of whether its EVER appropriate to engage in an exercise in gaudy, celebrity-drenched self-adulation. Axelrod added that this was a separate questionbut actually it isnt. Its painfully consistent for a media ecosystem that treats a DC schmoozefest as really mattering to treat the many victims of Americas healthcare system as if they dont.

Like Wolf in 2018, Noah had some serious words for the press on Saturday, amid all the jokes. In America you have the right to seek the truth and speak the truth, even if it makes people in power uncomfortableeven if it makes your viewers or your readers uncomfortable, he said, before pivoting to the war in Ukraine. Ask yourself this question: If Russian journalistshad the freedom to write any words, to show any stories, or to ask any questionsif they had basically what you havewould they be using it in the same way that you do? The immediate context here may have been different, but covid, again, was not a separate question.

Below, more on the Correspondents Dinner, covid, and the White House:

Other notable stories:

ICYMI: In western Canada, land defenders keep filming

TOP IMAGE: Trevor Noah, host of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show," speaks at the annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner, Saturday, April 30, 2022, in Washington. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

See the article here:

The elitist coverage of the Correspondents' Dinner and the coronavirus - Columbia Journalism Review

Here’s why people with allergic asthma are at lower COVID-19 risk – Science News Magazine

May 3, 2022

Scientists are discovering a surprising bright side for some people with asthma: They are less susceptible to COVID-19.

The very same immune system proteins that trigger excess mucus production and closing of airways in people with allergic asthma may erect a shield around vulnerable airway cells, researchers report in the April 19 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The finding helps explain why people with allergic asthma seem to be less susceptible to COVID-19 than those with related lung ailments, and could eventually lead to new treatments for the coronavirus.

Asthma is a breathing disorder characterized by airway inflammation. The result is coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath. About 8 percent of people in the United States have asthma, with about 60 percent of them having allergic asthma. Allergic asthma symptoms are triggered by allergens such as pollen or pet dander. Other types of asthma can be set off by exercise, weather or breathing in irritants such as strong perfumes, cleaning fumes or air pollution.

Usually, asthma is bad news when it comes to colds and flu. At the start of the pandemic, most experts predicted that coronavirus infections and asthma would be a dangerous mix, says Luke Bonser, a cell biologist at the University of California, San Francisco who was not involved in the study. And that is true for people whose asthma is not triggered by allergies and those with related lung disorders like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD. Those conditions put people at high risk for severe COVID-19.

But as the pandemic progressed, researchers noticed that people with allergic asthma werent developing severe COVID-19 as often as expected. Heres a look at why that may be.

What sets allergic asthma apart from other types of asthma and COPD is a protein called interleukin-13, or IL-13.

Usually, IL-13 helps the body fight off parasites such as worms. Certain T cells pump out the protein, and the body responds by churning out sticky mucus and constricting airways. This traps the worms, holding them in place until other immune system cells can come in for the kill.

In the case of [allergic] asthma, the body is making a mistake. Its mistaking a harmless substance, like pollen, for a worm, says Burton Dickey, a pulmonologist at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston who was not involved in the study.

But it wasnt clear how IL-13 was protecting people with allergic asthma from SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. To find out, pathophysiologist Camille Ehre of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill and colleagues grew cells from the lining of the airways from six lung donors. Some of the cells were treated with IL-13 to mimic allergic asthma. Then the researchers infected some of the cells with SARS-CoV-2.

Next on the list of to-dos was to compare how cells that havent been treated with IL-13 behave when healthy and when infected with the coronavirus.

Uninfected cells grew in lawns resembling lush grasslands, where the tufts of waving fronds are actually hairlike protrusions called cilia, which grow from the tops of airway-lining cells, the team confirmed. Cilias motions help move mucus, and anything stuck in the mucus, out of the lungs.

Cells infected with the coronavirus looked much different. The lush lawn was now slathered in mucus, and bald spots appeared as infected cells died. The doomed cells get squeezed out of the lawn of cilia and inflate like a balloon. The inflation happens partly because chambers called vacuoles inside the infected cells get clogged with viruses. Its just filled with viruses, and then it gets kicked out of the club and it blows up and releases all these viruses, Dickey says.

But not all the cells in the infected lawn were affected equally. Looking at the cells from the side, researchers could see that cells sporting cilia were infected with the coronavirus. But mucus-producing cells called goblet cells, which dont have cilia, were rarely infected. That may be because a protein called ACE2 decorates the surface of ciliated cells far more often than it does goblet cells. ACE2 is the protein that the coronavirus uses as a door into cells.

When researchers doused the cells with IL-13 before adding the coronavirus, the results were strikingly different.

The lawn of waving cilia atop the treated cells was mostly intact, with far fewer balloons of dying cells rising above the surface. But the fronds didnt wave as vigorously as in untreated cells. Thats because IL-13 reduces cilia beating, the researchers found. Less active cilia could mean that virus-laden mucus sticks around longer. That can be a double-edged sword inside the lungs because you want to clear the mucus, but you dont want to spread it around, Ehre says.

Counting cells under the microscope, the researchers saw that far fewer of the infected cells treated with IL-3 got the heave-ho. Whereas the untreated cells had ejected about 700 of their own by about four days after infection, only about 100 treated cells had gotten kicked out. The images showed that IL-13 really was protecting cells from infection. But how was still an unanswered question.

One thing that IL-13 does is stimulate airway-lining cells to churn out a type of sticky mucus that can trap viruses before they can infect cells. The team found that untreated cells released a burst of the mucus shortly after being infected with the coronavirus, depleting stores of the sticky stuff. But cells treated with IL-13 were still well-stocked with mucus.

All that extra mucus from the treated cells could ensnare viruses and expel them from the lungs before much damage is done. But people with nonallergic asthma and COPD make plenty of mucus too, and they arent protected from the virus. So Ehre and colleagues stripped away the mucus to see how the airway cells fared without this phlegmy trap.

Even without the mucus, IL-13 was still protective.

Examining patterns of gene activity, the team found that IL-13 was also causing cells to make less ACE2, the protein that SARS-CoV-2 commandeers as a gateway into cells. It makes it much harder for the virus to find its door to enter the cells, Ehre says.

That result agrees with previous findings from Bonser and colleagues. Being able to replicate the same data in several different studies, thats great, he says. And the new study looks more closely into IL-13s protective mechanism than previous research did.

Cells treated with IL-13 also turn down the activity of genes involved in making protein-producing factories called ribosomes, the researchers discovered. That may limit viral replication in cells. But some genes activity was also turned way up. That includes several genes involved in making keratan sulfate, a long, sugar-studded protein that is found in cartilage and the eyes corneas. Its there in the body to make a shield, Ehre says.

That seems to be what it is doing for airway cells too. A thick layer of keratan sulfate developed on top of cells treated with IL-13, armoring them against a coronavirus infection.

Which of these protective mechanisms is most important, or if its a combination of all of them, is one of the many things left to explore, Ehre says. This paper is not the final paper that figures everything out. There is way more work to do.

Knowing even more details about how IL-13 works to protect against the coronavirus could lead to new treatments, Bonser says. But IL-13 itself probably will not be used as a drug because of the inflammation, excess mucus, cough and shortness of breath it triggers.

Unfortunately, the extra protection doesnt mean that people with allergic asthma dont have to be concerned about getting COVID-19, Dickey says. People with asthma have had very bad outcomes. This is not a virus you want to take chances with, he says. But its OK to bask on the bright side a little. Its not fun to have asthma, so you have to be grateful for every rare occasion where it does something useful.

Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your inbox

Thank you for signing up!

There was a problem signing you up.

Go here to read the rest:

Here's why people with allergic asthma are at lower COVID-19 risk - Science News Magazine

More than 30 staff with COVID-19 at elementary school in Enfield – WWLP.com

May 3, 2022

ENFIELD, Conn. (WWLP) The Henry Barnard Elementary School in Enfield is facing a staffing shortage after more than 30 members tested positive with COVID-19.

According to a letter on Monday from Superintendent of Schools Christopher Drezek, more than thirty staff members tested positive for COVID-19 putting a strain on school operations. The school remained open Monday and Tuesday however, staff are instructed to bring home their iPads for remote learning in the event the school does not find additional staff to cover.

Superintendent Drezek says a discussion is being held Tuesday to move staff from other buildings to safely remain open as additional staff awaits test results.

Henry Barnard Elementary School is located on Shaker Road in Enfield with students in Kindergarten, 1st, and 2nd grade. On the staff roster, there are a total of 105 staff members. Those include 8 members in the main office, 8 Kindergarten teachers, 7 teachers for Grade 1, 7 teachers in Grade 2, and forty specialists that include art, music, PE, substitutes, and more. There is 7 staff listed under tutors, 25 para-professionals, and 3 lunch aides.

As of Monday, there are 153 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Enfield between April 10 and April 23. Enfield is listed color-coded red, meaning there are 15 or more cases of COVID-19 per 100,000 residents. It is recommended that everyone wear a mask in public indoor spaces even if they are fully vaccinated.

See the original post:

More than 30 staff with COVID-19 at elementary school in Enfield - WWLP.com

Page 361«..1020..360361362363..370380..»