Category: Corona Virus

Page 339«..1020..338339340341..350360..»

The 5 Most Dangerous Spots You Can Catch Coronavirus Eat This Not That – Eat This, Not That

June 28, 2022

The Omicron BA.2.12.1 subvariant is now the dominant COVID-19 variant in the US, responsible for 58% of recorded new coronavirus cases in the last week alone. "I'm in Connecticut, and it's like 80% of all sequences that we see right now," says Anne Hahn, PhD., postdoctoral researcher at the Yale School of Public Health. Here are the five most dangerous spots to catch COVID-19, according to experts. Read on to find out moreand to ensure your health and the health of others, don't miss Already Had COVID? These Symptoms May "Never Go Away".

Indoor gatherings such as weddings and parties are still dangerous, warns the World Health Organization. "In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is no 'zero risk' when it comes to any kind of gathering especially events that bring groups of people together," says the WHO. "Regardless of the size of the event, you are at risk from COVID-19 whenever you get together with people. The virus that causes COVID-19 spreads easily indoors, especially in poorly ventilated settings."

Planning a family cruise this summer? The CDC has lifted its warning on cruise ship travel, but virus experts are still recommending caution. "This means to prepare for the cruise, all four of you should be fully vaccinated and boosted," says Jessica Justman, infectious diseases specialist and epidemiologist at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, who recommends travelers make sure their ship has opted into the CDC's Covid-19 Program for Cruise Ships. "I suggest completing all booster doses a few weeks, and at least one week, before the trip starts. I would also be interested in how many inpatient beds and medical personnel are on the cruise and compare that to the number of passengers. One might confirm that the cruise follows guidelines such as the cruise ship health care guidelines from the American College of Emergency Physicians."

Buffets are risky due to close contact with both customers and staff. "While common utensils theoretically could lead to transmission of COVID from hand to spoon to hand, we actually don't have any good examples in clusters of COVID illnesses that surfaces really matter as much as people all standing close to each other does," says Benjamin Chapman, Ph.D., professor and food safety specialist in the department of Agricultural and Human Sciences at North Carolina State University. "Managing social distancing and line-ups is really the hardest part. Or in situations where staff will serve patrons from a buffet, the staff and patron interaction is the riskiest part."

Indoor gyms are still highly problematic in terms of catching the virus, experts warn. "If you're not willing to get COVID don't go," says Dr. Michael Klompas, a hospital epidemiologist and infectious disease physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital. "At a time like now, when there's a lot of COVID around, it is a high risk proposition."

Social distancing is practically impossible in airports, with people standing next to each other in check in and security lines and sitting close together on planes. "Avoid common-touch surfaces, hand hygiene wherever possible, masks, distancing, controlled-boarding procedures, try to avoid face-to-face contact with other customers, try to avoid being unmasked in flight, for meal and drink services, apart from when really necessary," says David Powell, physician and medical adviser to the International Air Transport Association. "The greatest protection you can give yourself is to be vaccinated and boosted."6254a4d1642c605c54bf1cab17d50f1e

Follow the public health fundamentals and help end this pandemic, no matter where you liveget vaccinated or boosted ASAP; if you live in an area with low vaccination rates, wear an N95 face mask, don't travel, social distance, avoid large crowds, don't go indoors with people you're not sheltering with (especially in bars), practice good hand hygiene, and to protect your life and the lives of others, don't visit any of these 35 Places You're Most Likely to Catch COVID.

Ferozan Mast

Read more:

The 5 Most Dangerous Spots You Can Catch Coronavirus Eat This Not That - Eat This, Not That

Five COVID Numbers That No Longer Make Any Sense – The Atlantic

June 28, 2022

The past two and a half years have been a global crash course in infection prevention. Theyve also been a crash course in basic math: Since the arrival of this coronavirus, people have been asked to count the meters and feet that separate one nose from the next; theyve tabulated the days that distance them from their most recent vaccine dose, calculated the minutes they can spend unmasked, and added up the hours that have passed since their last negative test.

What unites many of these numbers is the tendency, especially in the United States, to pick thresholds and view them as binaries: above this, mask; below this, dont; after this, exposed, before this, safe. But some of the COVID numbers that have stuck most stubbornly in our brains these past 20-odd months are now disastrously out of date. The virus has changed; we, its hosts, have as well. So, too, then, must the playbook that governs our pandemic strategies. With black-and-white, yes-or-no thinking, we do ourselves a disservice, Saskia Popescu, an epidemiologist at George Mason University, told me. Binary communication has been one of the biggest failures of how weve managed the pandemic, Mnica Feli-Mjer, of the nonprofit Ciencia Puerto Rico, told me.

Here, then, are five of the most memorable numerical shorthands weve cooked up for COVID, most of them old, some a bit newer. Its long past time that we forget them all.

2 doses = fully vaccinated

At the start of the vaccination campaign, getting dosed up was relatively straightforward. In the United States, a pair of Pfizer or Moderna shots (or just one Johnson & Johnson), then a quick two-week wait, and boom: full vaccination, and that was that. The phrase became a fixture on the CDC website and national data trackers; it spurred vaccine mandates and, for a time in the spring and summer of 2021, green-lit the immunized to doff their masks indoors.

Then came the boosters. Experts now know that these additional shots are essential to warding off antibody-dodging variants such as the many members of the Omicron clan. Some Americans are months past their fifth COVID shot, and the nations leaders are weighing whether vaccinated people will need to dose up again in the fall. To accommodate those additions, the CDC has, in recent public communications, tried to shift its terminology toward up to date. Katelyn Jetelina, an epidemiologist at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, prefers that phrase, because it allows for flexibility as recommendations evolve. It also more effectively nods at the range of protection that vaccination affords, depending on how many doses someones gotten and when their most recent dose was.

But fully vaccinated has been hard to shake, even for the CDC. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, maintains that the original definition has not changed, and the term still features heavily on CDC websites. Maybe part of the stubbornness is sheerly linguistic: Up to date means something different to everyone, depending on age, eligibility, health status, and vaccine brand. Fully vaccinated is also grabby in a way that up to date is not. It carries the alluring air of completion, suggesting that youre actually done with the vaccine series, maybe even the pandemic overall, Jessica Malaty Rivera, an epidemiologist and adviser at the Pandemic Prevention Institute, told me. All of this may be partly why that uptake of boosterswhich sound optional, even trivial, compared with the first two shotsremains miserably low in the U.S.

< 6 feet + > 15 minutes = close contact

Since the pandemics early days, Americans have been taught to benchmark our risk of exposure to the virus by two metrics: proximity and duration. Get within six feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes over a 24-hour period, and congratulationsyouve had a close contact. Even now, the CDC advises that this kind of encounter should trigger 10 full days of masking and, depending on your vaccination status and recent infection history, a test and/or a five-day quarantine.

Thresholds such as these made some sense when researchers werent yet savvy to the viruss main modes of transmission, and at least some efforts were made to contact trace, Jetelina told me. You needed some metric so you could call people. Nearly all contact-tracing attempts, though, have long since fizzled out. And scientists have known for years that SARS-CoV-2 can hitch a ride in bubbles of spittle and snot small enough to drift across rooms and remain aloft for hours, especially in poorly ventilated indoor spaces. Pathogens dont slam up against a magic wall at the six-foot mark, Malaty Rivera said. Nor will viruses bide their time for 14 minutes and 59 seconds before launching themselves noseward at 15 minutes on the dot. Exposure is a spectrum of high to low risk that factors in, yes, proximity and duration, but also venue, ventilation, mask quality, and more, Popescu said. Its not just exposed or not exposed.

The CDC acknowledges that SARS-CoV-2 can move beyond six feetbut the scientific justification behind its guidelines on preventing transmission was last updated in May 2021, just before the Delta variant bamboozled the nation. Since then, the coronavirus has gotten even more contagious and craftybetter at transmitting, better at dodging the antibodies that people raise. Even passing interactions and encounters have led to people becoming exposed and infected, Malaty Rivera said, especially if people are indoors and a ton of virus is being volleyed about. And yet, the mantra of six feet, 15 minutes has stayed. Schools have even cut the guidance in half, counting close contact only when children are less than three feet apart.

5 days = end of isolation

In the beginning, isolation numbers loomed large: Infected people had to wait at least 10 days after their symptoms began, or after their first positive test result, before they could reenter the world. Then, at the start of 2022, the CDC slashed the duration of isolation to just five days for people with mild or asymptomatic cases (regardless of vaccination status), as long as they kept masking and avoided travel through day 10. You didnt even need a negative test to go about your life.

This guideline has been perpetually behind the times. For much of 2021, truncating isolation might have made sense for vaccinated people, who clear the coronavirus faster than folks who havent gotten their shots, especially if negative tests confirmed the safety of exit. But only after the rise of Omicron did the guidance changeand it was based mostly on pre-Omicron data. The shift in guidance arrived just in time for the coronavirus to bust it wide open. After nearly two years of COVID symptoms starting around the time people first began to test positive, test positivity with Omicron and various iterations is now quite frequently lagging the onset of illness. Many people now report strings of negative results early in their symptom course, then positives that persist into their sixth, seventh, or eighth day of sickness or later, raising the possibility that they remain quite contagious past when formal isolation may end. I find it impossible to believe you can end isolation without testing, Malaty Rivera said.

Read: A negative COVID test has never been so meaningless

And yet, many workplaces have already embraced the five-day rule with no exit test, using that timeline as the basis for when employees should return. With masks largely gone, and paid sick leave so uncommon, defaulting to five days could drive more transmissionin some cases, likely inviting people back into public when theyre at their infectious peak.

Infection + 90 days = no retest

According to CDC guidelines, people who have caught SARS-CoV-2 dont need to test or quarantine if theyre exposed again within 90 days of their initial infection. This recommendation, which appeared in the pandemics first year, was designed in part to address the positives that can crop up on PCR tests in the weeks after people stop feeling sick. But the CDC also touts the low risk of subsequent infection for at least 6 months on one of its pages, last updated in October 2021. Reinfections can occur within 90 days, but thats early.

That framing might have once been pretty solid, before the era of widespread at-home antigen testingand before the rise of antibody-dodging variants, Popescu said. However, reinfections have gotten more common, and far closer together. They were happening even in the era of Delta; now, with so many immunity-evading Omicron offshoots at the helm, and masks and other mitigation matters mostly vanished, theyve become a quite-frequent fixture. The number of people who have caught the virus twice within just a matter of weeks has grown so much that we should forget these windows, Malaty Rivera said. Even the Department of Health and Human Services secretary recently tested positive twice in the same month.

Read: You are going to get COVID again and again and again

And yet, with these guidelines in place, many people have been lulled by the promise of rock-solid post-infection immunity, assuming that a new crop of symptoms are anything but COVID, Malaty Rivera said. That thinking is not only allowing a growing share of contagious coronavirus cases to go undetectedits also stymieing the study of reinfection dynamics writ large. Many studies, including those cited by the CDC in its guidance, wont even count reinfections earlier than 90 days. But the 90-day number, Malaty Rivera said, is no longer relevant. It has to be deleted from peoples minds.

200 cases + 10 hospital admissions per 100,000 = mask?

As obsolete as some of Americas COVID calculations may be, updates arent a universal win, either. Take the most recent iteration of mask recommendations from the CDC. The agency would like everyone to mask indoors if their county hits a high COVID community level, a threshold that is met only when the region logs 200 or more infections per 100,000 people in one week, and if local hospitals see more than 10 COVID-related admissions per 100,000 people in a week, or fill at least 15 percent of their inpatient beds. Currently, roughly 10 percent of U.S. counties are in the high category.

Read: The Biden administration killed Americas collective pandemic approach

But waiting to just suggest masks at those levels of transmission and hospitalizationnot even require themleaves far too much time for widespread disease, disability, even death, experts told me. A bar that high still lets long COVID slip through; it continues to imperil the vulnerable, immunocompromised, and elderly, who may not get the full benefit of vaccines. Case rates, Malaty Rivera pointed out, are also a terrible yardstick right now because so many people have been testing at home and not reporting the results to public-health agencies.

In Puerto Rico, Feli-Mjer and her colleagues have been struggling to reignite enthusiasm for mask wearing as their community battles its second-largest case wave since the start of the pandemic. A better system would flip on protections earliertaking a preventive approach, rather than scrambling to react. But thats a difficult stance for jurisdictions to assume when the official map looks so green and a little yellow, Feli-Mjer said. Its the problem of thresholds striking once again: No one cares to take up arms anew against the virus until the damage is already done. Thats made the pandemic that much easier to tune outits either here in full force, the thinking goes, or its totally gone. If only the calculus were that simple.

See the article here:

Five COVID Numbers That No Longer Make Any Sense - The Atlantic

As at-home testing increases, do we know how many people have COVID-19? – Hamilton Journal News

June 26, 2022

Since May 1, Premier has been testing about 140 swabs for COVID-19 each day.

Robust surveillance, including reporting the results of at-home tests, is critical to inform health agencies understanding of the current spread of the virus, said Ken Gordon, a spokesman with the Ohio Department of Health.

The overall volume of COVID-19 in our state and in specific areas lets Ohioans make informed decisions about what actions they should take to protect their health, he said.

Members of the Ohio National Guard work with Dayton Children's staff at the Dayton Children's Springboro COVID-19 testing site Thursday Jan. 13, 2022. MARSHALL GORBYSTAFF

Members of the Ohio National Guard work with Dayton Children's staff at the Dayton Children's Springboro COVID-19 testing site Thursday Jan. 13, 2022. MARSHALL GORBYSTAFF

Experts also say people who test positive at home should contact their primary health care providers to make sure they take appropriate steps to manage and possibly confirm their illness and avoid transmission.

Any positive test should be reported, said Nate Bednar, director of community services with Miami County Public Health.

Some experts have pointed out that the true number of infections always has been an undercount because at least some people who contract the illness do not have any symptoms and do not seek testing.

Eye on testing

Long lines for COVID-19 testing at Dayton Children's Hospital wrap around the parking lot on the northside of the complex. JIM NOELKER/STAFF

Credit: Jim Noelker

Long lines for COVID-19 testing at Dayton Children's Hospital wrap around the parking lot on the northside of the complex. JIM NOELKER/STAFF

Credit: Jim Noelker

Credit: Jim Noelker

Confirmed COVID cases have declined, but the virus is still prevalent in the community, and Premier Health continues to see a significant positivity rate, said Nick Lair, the groups system vice president of laboratory services.

We always have to keep an eye on it, he said. Were asking everybody to still be very mindful of the CDC guidelines, which is masking and/or six-foot distancing.

In May, about 13.8% of tests conducted by Premier were positive for COVID, according to its data.

By comparison, the average positivity rate was about 9.7% in 2020.

Premier, along with its partners, still operates seven testing sites down from about 11 earlier in the pandemic which continue to serve many people who need negative tests for reasons like travel, work or school.

Testing sites are still widely available across the region, but at-home testing kits are becoming increasingly popular among people who develop COVID-19 symptoms or who may have exposed to the virus.

About one-fifth of people with COVID-19-like symptoms during the omicron wave used at-home tests to try to determine if they were infected, according to a CDC survey.

Friday was the first day back for spring 2021 semester at the University of Dayton. Students were tested for COVID-19.

Credit: Jim Noelker

Friday was the first day back for spring 2021 semester at the University of Dayton. Students were tested for COVID-19.

Credit: Jim Noelker

Credit: Jim Noelker

The tests which officials say are quick, easy and pretty reliable are available for sale at local pharmacies, and many health departments also have kits to distribute and so do other organizations, like libraries and schools in some areas.

The Ohio Department of Health has distributed seven million tests to its partners since January 2021, and home testing has become a substantial part of the testing that is taking place in the state, even though it is impossible to know how many home tests have been used or are available, Gordon said.

Community members also can order free COVID-19 test kits online through http://www.covid.gov/tests that will be sent to their homes.

The plethora of available testing is helping control the spread of COVID-19 because people can easily find out if they are positive early on, Lair said.

But Premier Health says the availability of home tests can result in a undercount of COVID cases in the community because people who test positive using the kits do not typically require further testing.

At-home kits come with instructions that say people who test positive for the virus should provide the results to their health care providers for public health reporting.

But its very likely that some people possibly a significant number arent doing that, some state and local experts say.

A survey conducted from late December and early January found that nearly one-third of people who tested positive at home did not follow-up with a test at their doctors office or a testing facility, which makes it likely their positive results were not captured in the official case data.

Testing sites generally still are required to report positive results, Gordon said, but overall, testing data has become less useful as a measure of COVID-19 case burden and viral transmission in a community.

Gordon said the state encourages Ohioans to check the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions COVID-19 Community Levels as a more accurate picture of virus transmission.

The measurement combines case counts with COVID-19 hospitalization data to determine how significant a threat the virus is to various communities, he said.

Some experts say the decline in officially reported COVID-19 cases gives some people the false idea that the virus isnt a threat.

It is important that people who do self-tests report the results to their physicians, said Bednar, with Miami County Public Health.

Positive results can be reported to public health, he said, and if it is a proctored home COVID test, they should follow the instructions on the test packaging and report using the app.

Community members who test positive at home also should contact their primary care providers to find out if they need therapy, medical isolation and confirmatory or follow-up testing, said Deirdre Owsley, public health nurse in the communicable disease program at Greene County Public Health.

Owsley said Greene County residents who test positive for COVID at home should report the results to Greene County Public Health by calling 937-374-5638 or emailing cdrs@gcph.info.

Also, she said, Any follow-up test if not already reported virtually through the home-test manufacturer can be reported by the provider and/or medical laboratory.

Public Health Dayton & Montgomery County encourages people who test positive at home to contact their doctors to determine if they should begin any treatment, such as Paxlovid, which should be started within five days of the onset of symptoms, Dan Suffoletto, a spokesman for the agency.

Public Health tries to contact people who tested positive when it receives notice of positivity from doctors offices and testing facilities, Suffoletto said.

Public health notifies the Ohio Department of Health when it has confirmed COVID cases.

But Suffoletto said the number of reported cases may not fully capture the true number of infections.

Read the rest here:

As at-home testing increases, do we know how many people have COVID-19? - Hamilton Journal News

Where can the youngest U.S. children get vaccinated? Maybe not at your local pharmacy. Here’s why. – The New York Times

June 26, 2022

Dr. Deborah L. Birx, President Donald J. Trumps coronavirus response coordinator, told a congressional panel on Thursday that the Trump administrations attitude toward the coronavirus had caused a false sense of security in America.Credit...Jason Andrew for The New York Times

WASHINGTON Dr. Deborah L. Birx, President Donald J. Trumps coronavirus response coordinator, told a congressional committee investigating the federal pandemic response that Trump White House officials asked her to change or delete parts of the weekly guidance she sent state and local health officials, in what she described as a consistent effort to stifle information as virus cases surged in the second half of 2020.

Dr. Birx, who publicly testified to the panel Thursday morning, also told the committee that Trump White House officials withheld the reports from states during a winter outbreak and refused to publicly release the documents, which featured data on the viruss spread and recommendations for how to contain it.

Her account of White House interference came in a multiday interview the committee conducted in October 2021, which was released on Thursday with a set of emails Dr. Birx sent to colleagues in 2020 warning of the influence of a new White House pandemic adviser, Dr. Scott Atlas, who she said downplayed the threat of the virus. The emails provide fresh insight into how Dr. Birx and Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the governments top infectious disease expert, grappled with what Dr. Birx called the misinformation spread by Dr. Atlas.

The push to downplay the threat was so pervasive, Dr. Birx told committee investigators, that she developed techniques to avoid attention from White House officials who might have objected to her public health recommendations. In reports she prepared for local health officials, she said, she would sometimes put ideas at the ends of sentences so colleagues skimming the text would not notice them.

In her testimony on Thursday, she offered similarly withering assessments of the Trump administrations coronavirus response, suggesting that officials in 2020 had mistakenly viewed the coronavirus as akin to the flu, even after seeing high Covid-19 death rates in Asia and Europe. That perspective, she said, had caused a false sense of security in America as well as a sense among the American people that this was not going to be a serious pandemic.

Not using concise, consistent communication, she added, resulted in inaction early on, I think, across our agencies.

And those at fault, she said, were not just the president.

Many of our leaders were using words like, We could contain, she continued. And you cannot contain a virus that cannot be seen. And it wasnt being seen because we werent testing.

Dr. Birx became a controversial figure during her time in the Trump White House.

A respected AIDS researcher, she was plucked from her position running the governments program to combat the international H.I.V. epidemic to coordinate the federal Covid response. But her credibility came into question when she failed to correct Mr. Trumps unscientific musings about the coronavirus and praised him on television as being attentive to the scientific literature. She was also criticized for bolstering White House messaging in the early months of the coronavirus outbreak that the pandemic was easing.

Yet as outbreaks continued that year, Mr. Trump and some senior advisers grew increasingly impatient with Dr. Birx and her public health colleagues, who were insistent on aggressive mitigation efforts. Searching for a contrarian presence, the White House hired Dr. Atlas, who functioned as a rival to Dr. Birx.

They believed the counterfactual points that were never supported by data from Dr. Atlas, she said in Thursdays hearing.

In one email obtained by the committee, dated Aug. 11, 2020, Dr. Birx told Dr. Fauci and other colleagues about what she called a very dangerous Oval Office meeting with Mr. Trump. In that session, she said, Dr. Atlas had called masks overrated and not needed, and had argued against virus testing, saying it could hurt Mr. Trump politically.

Dr. Birx claimed that Dr. Atlas had inspired Mr. Trump to call for narrower recommendations on who should seek testing.

Case identification is bad for the presidents re-election testing should only be of the sick, she recounted Dr. Atlas saying.

He noted that it was the task force that got us into this ditch by promoting testing and falsely increasing case counts compared to other countries, she added, referring to a group of senior health officials that gathered regularly at the White House. The conclusion was Dr. Atlas is brilliant and the president will be following his guidance now.

In another email sent to senior health officials two days later, Dr. Birx cataloged seven ideas espoused by Dr. Atlas that she referred to as misinformation, including that the virus was comparable to the flu, that football players could not get seriously ill from the virus and that children are immune.

I am at a loss of what we should do, she wrote, warning that if caseloads kept mounting, there would be 300K dead by Dec. The United States ended the year with more than 350,000 Covid deaths.

I know what I am going to do, Dr. Fauci wrote in reply. I am going to keep saying what we have been saying all along, which contradicts each of his seven points listed below. If the press ask me whether what I say differs from his, I will merely say that I respectfully disagree with him.

In her interviews with the committee last year, Dr. Birx described regular attempts by others to undermine the weekly pandemic assessments she first sent to state and local officials in June 2020, which offered comprehensive data and state-specific recommendations regarding the status of the pandemic, the committee wrote.

Beginning in the fall of that year, Dr. Birx said, she began receiving a list of changes for three or four states each week, which sometimes involved bids to loosen mask recommendations or indoor capacity restrictions. In one instance, she was asked to soften guidance for South Dakota officials and remove some recommendations for the state, which had a surge in cases.

When she asked the White House to publish the reports so Americans would know more about outbreaks in their communities, the request was denied, she told investigators. In December 2020, she told them, the White House stopped sending the reports to states unless they were requested.

Dr. Birx told committee investigators that she was asked to change the reports about 25 percent of the time or else they would not be sent.

Sheryl Gay Stolberg contributed reporting.

Read the rest here:

Where can the youngest U.S. children get vaccinated? Maybe not at your local pharmacy. Here's why. - The New York Times

COVID Symptoms vs. Cold: Here’s How to Spot the Difference – NBC Chicago

June 26, 2022

If you've come down with a runny nose or sore throat recently, you may be wondering whether it's the common cold, allergies or a COVID-19 infection.

Health officials say it can be difficult to tell what illness you're experiencing based on the symptoms, but getting tested is one way to find out -- including people who have been vaccinated, experts say.

"Even if it's a sore throat, no matter what it is," Dr. Allison Arwady, commissioner of the Chicago Department of Public Health, said in a Facebook live last month. "I've told my own staff this, it's what I do myself... if you are sick, even a little bit sick, stay home. More true than ever right now because sick, even a little bit sick, until proven otherwise with a test - that's COVID. That's how we treat it, that's how you should treat it."

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the common cold, allergies and coronavirus overlap in some symptoms, like the potential for a cough, shortness of breath or breathing difficulties, fatigue, headaches, a sore throat and congestion.

Symptoms more associated with coronavirus include fever, muscle and body aches, loss of taste or smell, nausea or vomiting and diarrhea.

For some people, coronavirus causes mild or moderate symptoms that clear up in a couple weeks. For others, it may cause no symptoms at all. For some, the virus can cause more severe illness, including pneumonia and death.

Even those who receive the coronavirus vaccine can also still contract the virus and may experience symptoms.

Most vaccinated people either have no symptoms or exhibit very mild symptoms, according to health officials, and the virus rarely results in hospitalization or death for those individuals.

Coronavirus and the common cold share many symptoms.

According to the Mayo Clinic, diarrhea and nausea or vomiting are the only symptoms associated with coronavirus that don't overlap with the common cold.

The hospital also notes that whileCOVIDsymptoms generally appear two to 14 days after exposure to SARS-CoV-2, symptoms of a common cold usually appear one to three days after exposure to a cold-causing virus.

Dr. Katherine Poehling, an infectious disease specialist and member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices,told NBC Newsin January that a cough, congestion, runny nose and fatigue appear to be prominent symptoms with the omicron variant.

However, unlike the delta variant, many patients are not losing their taste or smell. She noted that these symptoms may only reflect certain populations.

See the original post:

COVID Symptoms vs. Cold: Here's How to Spot the Difference - NBC Chicago

Britain is being hit by a new wave of Covid so what do we do now? – The Guardian

June 26, 2022

Britain is now going through its third major wave of Covid-19 infections this year. According to the ONS Infection Survey released last week, about 1.7 million people in the UK are estimated to have been infected in the week ending 18 June, a 23% rise on the previous week. This follows a 43% jump the previous week. The figures raise several important questions about how the nation will fare in the coming months as it struggles to contain the disease.

Most scientists and statisticians pin the latest jump on two fast-spreading Omicron sub-variants: BA.4 and BA.5. Crucially, two other countries Portugal and South Africa have experienced major jumps in numbers of cases due to these two sub-variants.

The waves in these countries have since peaked and neither resulted in a major increase in severe disease. Nevertheless, we should note there were some increases in hospitalisations, said John Edmunds, professor of infectious disease modelling at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The rise we are experiencing now is certainly not good news but it does not look, at present, like it has the potential to lead to disaster.

This point was backed by Stephen Griffin, associate professor at Leeds Universitys school of medicine We are in a better place now than in 2020 and 2021 due to the UK vaccine programme, he said. However, he warned the level of post-infections complications long Covid was troubling. It is abundantly clear the governments living with Covid strategy lacks long-term provision for wellbeing.

The government is already committed to vaccinating the over-65s, frontline health and social workers and vulnerable younger people in the autumn. However, the health and social care secretary Sajid Javid last week hinted that this might be extended to include all those over 50. The move would improve protection against Covid-19 at a time when immunity will have waned in much of the population.

However, the type of vaccine to be given is not yet settled with many scientists insisting it should be able to provide protection not just against the original Wuhan strain of Covid-19 but also against its most prevalent recent variant, Omicron. Moderna has developed such a vaccine, for example.

Omicron looks to be extremely fit, said James Naismith, of the Rosalind Franklin Institute in Oxford. We are now seeing different strains of it appearing, not a wholesale switch like the one we saw from Delta to Omicron. So I think it is perhaps unlikely we will see a completely new Omega strain, which makes it sensible to continue to target Omicron.

Sars-cov-2, the virus responsible for Covid-19, is not the first coronavirus that has been found to affect human beings. Other members of this class of virus cause mild respiratory illnesses and one day Covid-19 may reach a similar, relatively safe status in the population though not in the near future, says Prof Mark Woolhouse of Edinburgh University.

That situation will arise when the virus is circulating quite freely and people get infected multiple times as children, and so, by the time they get to be adults, they have actually built up pretty solid immunity - certainly against serious disease. However, its going to take a long time before we live in a population where most of us have had multiple exposures as children. That is decades away, though that does not mean we will be faced with severe public health problems for all that time. These problems will diminish - though there will be bumps on the way.

However, Woolhouse added, this is not going to settle down properly in my lifetime.

Read the original here:

Britain is being hit by a new wave of Covid so what do we do now? - The Guardian

Faster Progress Is Needed on Treatments for Long Covid – Bloomberg

June 26, 2022

Long Covid is making it hard for millions of Americans to return to normal life, pushing some out of the workforce altogether, sometimes permanently. Yet medical efforts to figure out how best to help these patients are proceeding only slowly.

Research has zeroed in on a few probable causes of long Covid, perhaps the most intriguing of which is the idea that the coronavirus sometimes lingers in the body undetected for months after an initial infection. The theories should not be difficult to investigate, and the National Institutes of Health has $1.2 billion to spend on the work. But its not moving fast enough.

See the original post:

Faster Progress Is Needed on Treatments for Long Covid - Bloomberg

Will COVID evolve to cause less severe disease? Why we can’t assume the answer is yes – San Francisco Chronicle

June 26, 2022

When scientists find a new disease-causing virus in humans, the first question they want answered is: Can this thing spread easily from person to person? And if not, will it someday?

Avian influenza can infect humans, but its not very good at passing from one person to another. Same with the coronavirus that causes MERS, another severe respiratory illness. Though hundreds of cases of both have been reported over the past two decades, neither virus seems inclined to evolve toward efficient person-to-person transmission.

In less than three years, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 has mastered it.

SARS-CoV-2 has accumulated a suite of mutations over an astonishingly short period of time that have made it now one of the most infectious human pathogens on the planet. And for the first time ever, scientists have the tools and the knowledge to closely track that evolution in near-real time, studying the small but mighty genomic mutations that have transformed the virus to the point where it hardly resembles the strain that began infecting humans in China in late 2019.

Mapping the evolution of this virus has fed academically curious minds in every nation, and its had real world implications too. Identifying and describing new variants has helped guide public health responses and is now informing the next generation of vaccines and drug therapies.

The coronavirus rapid evolution also is helping scientists anticipate the future of the pandemic, and what mutations may make it a less or more formidable foe in years to come.

This is the first time in human history that weve been able to witness a global pandemic at the genomic, evolutionary level, said Joe DeRisi, president of San Franciscos Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, which has done genomic sequencing on the virus since the start of the pandemic.

Joe DeRisi, president of the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, stands for a portrait on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020, in San Francisco.

Whats been especially fascinating, and at times alarming, is the speed of this virus evolution. That SARS-CoV-2 would mutate to better adapt to humans was always anticipated, but the pace of that adaptation has been breathtaking.

Scientists say thats in large part due to the scale of the pandemic more than half a billion infections worldwide have afforded the virus near-boundless opportunity to mutate. But its a matter of timing, too. As a human virus, SARS-CoV-2 is still in its infancy, developing rapidly to flourish in its new environment. Meanwhile, human immunity to the virus due to infection and vaccination has become increasingly complex, applying constant pressure to further evolve.

Its normal to see this kind of evolution this constant battle between human and pathogen, said Fenyong Liu, an infectious disease expert at UC Berkeleys School of Public Health. Each of us is focused on survival. We develop a better system to beat them, and theyre going to mutate and try to escape. It happens with all infectious diseases, but for COVID, the whole process really sped up because of the scale of it.

Tanya Alexander waits in line for COVID-19 test with her grandson Sincere Perkins, 9, at Bayview Opera House in San Francisco on Thursday, Jan. 6, 2022.

Predicting how evolution will shape the next iterations of this virus is tricky, and scientists lack the technology to do it with any precision. How the virus has mutated over the past two and a half years provides some clues: Scientists have identified dozens of specific mutations mostly associated with increasing infectiousness that have recurred in multiple variants. Those mutations likely will keep showing up, re-sorting themselves in different combinations that give the virus further survival advantages. Some of the mutations could become permanently embedded in the virus genetic code. A few already have.

Recently, the virus has mutated to evade hard-won human immunity, and most experts in virology believe it will continue down that evolutionary path. It could also acquire new mutations that make it more infectious, though its already become so efficient at spreading among humans that its hard to imagine how much more gains it can make there, some scientists say.

The most critical question and possibly the toughest to answer is whether the virus will evolve to cause more or less severe disease in humans. Many experts believe that viruses tend to become more benign over time one of the current coronaviruses that now causes the common cold may have been the source of a deadly pandemic in the late 1800s but thats not a sure thing, and no one can say how long such evolution may take. Omicron and its subvariants are causing milder disease than their predecessors, but it would be nave to assume a future variant couldnt arrive with mutations that make it fiercer once again, experts say.

Social distancing circles at Dolores Park on Saturday, May 23, 2020, in San Francisco. The 10-foot circles, which were eight feet apart from each other, were an effort to curb coronavirus spread.

Hopefully it will adapt and become a very mild seasonal disease, and our immune systems will adapt, too, Liu said. But in reality, the virus has unlimited capability to adapt and mutate.

Scientists began tracking the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 almost immediately after the virus was isolated and identified in early January 2020. Once the first genomic sequence was complete and had been shared on a public database, infectious disease experts around the world started hunting for mutations, largely to keep tabs on how the virus was spreading.

Most people by now are familiar with the role mutations play in giving the virus certain advantages. But most mutations dont actually have an obvious effect on the virus, theyre simply glitches in the code. Those mutations can serve as evolutionary breadcrumbs, though, allowing scientists to follow the virus trail as it travels widely around the globe. And throughout the pandemic, public health experts have used mutations to identify and control clusters of infections.

Still, scientists are most invested in tracking consequential mutations that may alter the public health response. For example, arrival of the incredibly infectious omicron led many officials to recommend people start wearing higher quality masks, and eventually triggered another universal mask mandate in California to help curb the spread.

The most influential mutations mostly have been identified in the spike protein, the section of the virus that projects out of the surface and latches onto the ACE2 receptor, a protein on the exterior of human cells through which SARS-CoV-2 gains entry.

The first significant mutation known as D614G and nicknamed Doug arrived sometime in spring 2020; it basically made the ACE2 receptor more accessible. It was like putting a wedge in the door to keep it open, said Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences.

Shannon Bennett, chief of science for the California Academy of Sciences, studies infectious diseases that can be transmitted from animals to humans. Here, she plays her piano at her home on March 20, 2020, in Mill Valley, Calif.

That mutation granted the virus an early boost in infectiousness, and it has stuck around in every important variant since. Identifying a mutation of that significance was surprising, and exciting, Bennett said. It was the kind of early evolutionary shift that scientists have never been able to capture before. With earlier viruses HIV, for example by the time scientists identified and were able to study them closely enough to look for mutations, they were already well established in humans and had likely gone through years of vigorous adaptations.

After D614G, the virus quickly accumulated mutations that mostly improved its ability to transmit and infect. Scientists havent yet determined exactly what all those changes are doing, at the biological level, to increase infectiousness. Some may allow the virus to replicate faster in the nose or bind more tightly to the ACE2 receptor, making it harder for the immune system to shake off an early infection. Mutations could also make the virus more durable, for instance able to survive for longer periods in the air.

By the end of 2020, it was becoming apparent that the virus was evolving quickly in an environment of widespread transmission. Troubling new variants were emerging at regular intervals, each causing new waves of infection in the country in which they emerged and sometimes on a global scale. And each new variant seemed to be at least somewhat more infectious than the one preceding it. Alpha, which dominated in the U.S. in early 2021, was perhaps 50% more infectious than the original virus, and delta, which fueled the summer 2021 surge, was perhaps 90% more infectious than alpha.

Nurse practitioner Paige Yang mixes a dose of Evusheld, a preventative monoclonal injection, at Total Infusion in Oakland, Calif. on March 16, 2022. The medication is used to prevent COVID-19 among immunocompromised patients.

Omicron, which carried dozens of new mutations, was again more infectious up to fivefold over delta. And each of its subvariants has been more infectious still. The currently circulating strains, all offspring of omicron, are nearly as infectious as measles, which is the most contagious of all known human infections.

Scientists say the virus may have hit peak infectiousness, or close to it. Now, its evolving to get around the immune response, and that trend likely will continue. Early studies show that the two up-and-coming variants in the U.S. BA.4 and BA.5, which currently make up roughly a third of cases are the most immune evasive so far; people who are vaccinated or have already been infected, or both, may still be vulnerable.

I think theres a max in terms of how transmissible it can be, said Nadia Roan, an investigator at the Gladstone Institutes in San Francisco who studies immunology. Now almost the entire world has some form of immunity, whether from infection or vaccination or both, and thats the big pressure. A virus that is able to take off right now has to be immune evasive.

Scientist Xiaoyu Luo, postdoctoral scholar Julie Frouard, lead scientist Nadia Roan, PhD, and research assistant Matthew McGregor wear masks and lab coats while walking through the lab at Gladstone Institutes in San Francisco on Thursday, August 13, 2020.

Immune evasion is such a concern that many experts believe the world needs to focus resources on developing next-generation vaccines that will target parts of the virus less prone to mutations. Manufacturers of the two main U.S. vaccines Pfizer and Moderna are working to update their products to better match the currently circulating variants, but thats difficult to do when the dominant variant changes every few months.

Ideally, scientists would develop a vaccine that neutralizes the virus preventing it from ever taking hold and stopping transmission entirely and doesnt fade over time. The latter may not be possible, though. It doesnt seem that this coronavirus will be inducing the same immunity that polio and measles induces that lasts for your entire life, said Raul Andino, a UCSF virologist.

Eventually, the pace of evolution in SARS-CoV-2 may slow down, or at least produce fewer consequential mutations that cause fresh surges several times a year. But its tough to guess when that will happen.

Virus evolution is relentless. The virus never takes a rest, never takes a break, and it never stops mutating, DeRisi said. The truce may come when we figure out what kind of yearly boosters we need, or what vaccination works.

We want to get the virus to where it just doesnt matter anymore, he said. Were not there yet. But theres reason to be optimistic, and also reason to be cautious and not let our guard down.

Erin Allday is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: eallday@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @erinallday

Continue reading here:

Will COVID evolve to cause less severe disease? Why we can't assume the answer is yes - San Francisco Chronicle

Some long COVID patients still have virus in the blood; Paxlovid rebound patients may need longer treatment – Reuters

June 24, 2022

A healthcare worker collects a swab from a passenger for a PCR test against the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) before traveling to Uganda, amidst the spread of the new SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron, at O.R. Tambo International Airport in Johannesburg, South Africa, November 28, 2021. REUTERS/ Sumaya Hisham/File Photo

Register

June 23 (Reuters) - The following is a summary of some recent studies on COVID-19. They include research that warrants further study to corroborate the findings and that has yet to be certified by peer review.

Some long COVID patients still have virus in blood

Some cases of long COVID may be the immune system's response to a SARS-CoV-2 infection lurking somewhere in the body, new findings from a small study suggest.

Register

Researchers analyzed multiple plasma samples collected over time from 63 patients with COVID-19, including 37 who went on to develop long COVID. In the majority of those with long COVID, the spike protein from the surface of the virus was detectable for up to 12 months, whereas it was not present in plasma samples from recovered patients without lasting symptoms. Spike protein circulating in the blood could mean "a reservoir of active virus persists in the body," the researchers said in a paper posted on medRxiv last week ahead of peer review. Exactly where that reservoir might be is not clear from this study. Researchers said they have previously found active virus in the gastrointestinal tract of children weeks after the initial coronavirus infection, and other researchers have found genetic evidence of the virus "in multiple anatomic sites up to seven months after symptom onset."

If the results can be confirmed in larger studies, the presence of spike protein in the blood long after the initial infection may be one way to diagnose long COVID, the researchers said.

Paxlovid "rebound" patients may need longer treatment

The rebound of symptoms reported in some COVID-19 patients who took a five-day course of Pfizer's antiviral Paxlovid pills may be the result of insufficient treatment, according to researchers who closely evaluated one such patient.

Trial results showed that Paxlovid can reduce the risk of hospitalization and death from COVID-19 in high-risk patients by 89% if taken within five days of symptom onset. In some patients, however, virus levels and symptoms have rebounded after completing a course of Paxlovid, leading to concerns that variants might be developing resistance to the two-drug treatment or that the pills may somehow be weakening patients' antibody resistance. But when researchers isolated the Omicron BA.2 variant from a rebound patient and tested it in lab experiments, they found it was still sensitive to Paxlovid and had no mutations that would reduce the drug's effectiveness. They also found their patient's antibodies could still block the virus from entering and infecting new cells.

The rebound of COVID-19 symptoms after Paxlovid treatment is likely happening because not enough of the drug is reaching infected cells to completely stop the virus from making copies of itself, the researchers said in a paper published on Monday in Clinical Infectious Diseases. It is also possible that the drug may be metabolized, or processed, at different rates in different people, or that some people need to take it for more than five days.

After COVID-19, kids have more symptoms but less anxiety

Persistent health problems were only slightly more common in children after COVID-19 than in similarly-aged kids who avoided the virus, researchers from Denmark reported on Wednesday in The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. Anxiety levels, however, were higher in children who never had COVID-19, the researchers also found.

They said 40% of infants and toddlers with COVID-19 and 27% of their uninfected peers experienced at least one symptom for more than two months. Among kids ages 4 to 11, persistent symptoms were seen in 38% with COVID-19 and 34% without it. And among 12- to 14-year-olds, 46% of those with COVID-19 and 41% of those without it had long-lasting symptoms. The results were based on a survey of nearly 11,000 mothers of infected children and nearly 33,000 mothers of uninfected kids.

While symptoms associated with long COVID such as headache, mood swings, abdominal pain and fatigue are often experienced by otherwise healthy children, infected children had longer-lasting symptoms and one-third had new symptoms that developed after COVID-19. To the researchers' surprise, children who had COVID-19 experienced fewer psychological and social problems than those in the control group. They speculated this may be because the uninfected children had more "fear of the unknown disease and more restricted everyday life due to protecting themselves from catching the virus."

Click for a Reuters graphic on vaccines in development.

Register

Reporting by Nancy Lapid; Editing by Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Follow this link:

Some long COVID patients still have virus in the blood; Paxlovid rebound patients may need longer treatment - Reuters

Page 339«..1020..338339340341..350360..»