Category: Corona Virus

Page 19«..10..18192021..3040..»

Several key policies to stop the spread of COVID-19 were generally a good idea in hindsight according to majority of … – News-Medical.Net

June 20, 2024

In a recent report posted on the Harvard University website, the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the de Beaumont Foundation present findings from a national poll they conducted to obtain public views on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic-related policies.

In the present study, researchers highlight the views and opinions of US adults regarding emergent epidemics based on a poll conducted between March 21 and April 2, 2024.

The researchers surveyed 1,017 individuals in English and Spanish via phone and online. Panelists were selected randomly using an address sampling (ABS) frame and random-digit (RDD) samples from SSRS surveys. Most panelists took the survey online, with a minor subgroup who did not have internet access doing it over the phone.

The researchers evaluated the efficacy of four COVID-19 pandemic-era policies: mask use, health staff immunization, eating closures, and school closings. They invited participants to consider their thoughts on these policies and identify the primary causes of their negative impact.

They investigated participant attitudes toward the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the state public health agency, and the local public health department. They asked the participants if the steps adopted by these agencies were reasonable, excessive, or insufficient. The survey also asked participants about the seriousness of COVID-19 for public health in the United States and their views on COVID-19 policies.

The researchers weighted sample data based on selection and recruitment likelihood, response rates, and demographic characteristics to address non-sampling errors that could arise from non-response bias, question phrasing, and ordering effects. They used procedures like random sampling, contact attempts, replication subsamples, and systematic respondent selection within homes for sample representativeness.

In retrospect, most Americans view four pandemic-related policies positively, with varying percentages believing each was a favorable idea: mask-wearing requirements in businesses and stores (70%), healthcare personnel vaccinations (65%), closing down of indoor dining restaurants (63%), and schools (56%).

Most Americans (79%) believe one or more of the COVID-19-related measures are favorable for public health, with 42% reporting all four were excellent ideas and 37% believing only a few were. About 20% of US adults believe all four programs were terrible ideas in retrospect.

Most subgroups, including rural residents and Republicans, believe one or more of the four COVID-19 policies were favorable for population health in retrospect. Democrats (71%) showed a higher likelihood than Republicans (18%) and Independents (44%) to believe all policies were favorable, as are Blacks (62%) and Hispanics or Latinos (55%) compared to white individuals (32%), and urban residents (55%) compared to those from suburban (39%) and rural (29%) backgrounds.

A few Americans believe that COVID-19 policies are not a good idea due to concerns regarding their long duration (84% to 87% across COVID-19 policies), political motivations (60% to 81%), economic effects (68% to 91%), and apparent lacking of personal choices (75% to 94%). The participants deemed school closures an unfavorable idea since they would negatively impact children's psychological health (91%) and learning (97%).

Americans have varying views on the severity of COVID-19's early-on threat. Only 3.0% of Americans believe it is not a primary health concern, while many believe it is a primary threat to all, including elders (14%) and those with existing medical issues (94%). Approximately 37% considered COVID-19 a primary health concern for everyone at the outset. Those who believe COVID-19 threats were prevalent early on showed an increased likelihood of supporting essential pandemic legislation.

The findings indicate significant population support for COVID-19 measures and cautionary stories about the difficulties of formulating and explaining the policies. Public healthcare officials could benefit from establishing right-sized strategies that target individuals at high risk over a specific timeframe.

Even if population health groups do not select which policies to enact, it would be beneficial to discuss the epidemiological reasoning behind them and note their societal and economic implications.

Disentangling population health guidelines from local and national politics would continue to be a primary challenge; however, efforts to comprehend public viewpoints and connect with individuals receptive to all parties would be critical to assuring that all US residents benefit from public health protections in emerging pandemics.

Journal references:

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health/de Beaumont Foundation poll, US Views on Pandemic Policies: Lessons for Emerging Outbreaks, June 2024, published online at https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/

See the article here:

Several key policies to stop the spread of COVID-19 were generally a good idea in hindsight according to majority of ... - News-Medical.Net

What is Coronavirus, COVID-19 News, Coronavirus Symptoms, Precautions, Updates – Business Standard

June 20, 2024

The Coronavirus outbreak (officially known as Covid-19), which started in China, has so far killed 6,311,923

people across the globe and infected 532,022,757 (as on May 31, 2022). The virus has spread to 228 countries. In India, 43,158,087 confirmed cases and 524,630 deaths have been reported so far, according to official figures released by the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). To check the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, or Covid-19, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced nationwide lockdown till May, meaning the country's 1.3 billion citizens except those engaged in providing essential services would not step out of their homes. This lockdown was extended a couple of times and lifted in a graded way starting June 2020. The restrictions related to coronavirus spread will be lifted nation-wide from March 31, 2022.

Coronavirus in India and elsewhere: Total number of cases in India (state-wise) and all countries of the world

What is coronavirus?

Coronaviruses are a large group of viruses that are common among animals. In rare cases, they can be transmitted from animals to humans. The spikes protruding from the virus's membrane look like the sun's corona. It is from this that the virus gets the name 'coronavirus'. It causes illnesses of the respiratory tract, ranging from the common cold to severe conditions like SARS. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), a novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans.

What is the difference between Coronavirus and Covid-19

Covid-19 is the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, which originated from China's Wuhan. On February, World Health Organisation (WHO) named the novel coronavirus "Covid-19". "Co" stands for "corona", "vi" for "virus" and "d" for "disease", while "19" was for the year, as the outbreak was first identified on December 31.

According to the WHO, "there are different procedures, and purposes, for naming viruses and diseases.

"Viruses are named based on their genetic structure to facilitate the development of diagnostic tests, vaccines and medicines."

Viruses are named by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV).

This particular virus was named "severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2" or SARS-CoV-2.

The WHO says that "from a risk communications perspective, using the name SARS can have unintended consequences in terms of creating unnecessary fear for some populations, especially in Asia which was worst affected by the SARS outbreak in 2003".

Symptoms of coronavirus

Coronavirus can make people sick, usually with a mild to moderate upper respiratory tract illness, similar to a common cold. Some of the symptoms are

A general feeling of being unwell

Runny nose

Sore throat

Headache

Cough

Fever

Is there a vaccine for coronavirus?

Plasma therapy a possible treatment for coronavirus?

With no surety of a definite treatment in sight, doctors around the world are dusting off a century-old treatment for infections: Infusion of blood plasma teeming with immune molecules that might help survivors beat the infection.Convalescent plasma is an experimental procedure for coronavirus patients.Clickhereto read more

Coronavirus helpline number and e-mail id

Union Health Ministry has activated a toll-free 24x7 national helpline number, 1075, to address queries related to the infection. Anyone seeking information can also call on the number 011-23978046.

The helpline e-mail ID for Coronavirus is ncov2019[at]gmail[dot]com

AI chatbot - A WhatsApp helpline to answer queries about Coronavirus

An AI-based automated helpline helps to address queries regarding Covid-19. The AI chatbot is integrated in WhatsApp and can be reached by any users by messaging on +91-93213-98773. The chatbot is privately operated, and is promoted by Mumbai-based startup Haptik. While not being an official helpline, an information source such as nCov is useful in helping individuals get a quick response to common queries on Coronavirus.

Who is more likely to be a victim coronavirus?

How do you catch coronavirus?

Will the coronavirus spread through cough or sex?

How dangerous is coronavirus? Does coronavirus cause death?

A few coronaviruses are known to be deadly. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), which was first reported in the Middle East, causes severe respiratory problems. Four out of every 10 patients infected with MERS died in 2012.

The infamous Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) causes even more severe symptoms. Along with respiratory problems, it also causes diarrhoea, shortness of breath, fatigue and kidney failure. The death rate with SARS was higher, with older people being the most vulnerable.

The new virus (Covid-19) claimed over 3,000 lives and over 93,000 people were diagnosed positive.

How is coronavirus diagnosed?

Doctors may recommend the patient to undergo tests on respiratory specimens and serum to detect coronaviruses. If anyone experiences the symptoms, they must inform their doctor about recent travel or contact with animals.

How contagious is coronavirus?

Coronaviruses are highly contagious. Coughing and sneezing without covering the mouth can spread the virus.

Touching hands of a person that has the virus can pass the virus from one person to another

Making contact with an object that has the virus and then touching your nose, eyes, or mouth can infect a person

A coronavirus may spread through contact with feces.

Coronavirus and pregnancy

In pregnant women, the severe versions of SARS and MERS coronaviruses were found to be severe. According to reports, women who suffered from severe versions of coronaviruses had stillbirth.

What are the precautions for Coronavirus?

Wash your hands thoroughly with soap

Avoid touching your eyes, nose, or mouth with unclean hands

Avoid close contact with people who are sick

Avoid public gatherings

Read more here:

What is Coronavirus, COVID-19 News, Coronavirus Symptoms, Precautions, Updates - Business Standard

Health Department continues fight against COVID-19 – The Tribune | The Tribune – Ironton Tribune

June 20, 2024

Published 5:00 am Thursday, June 20, 2024

By Terry L. Hapney, Jr. The Ironton Tribune

Lawrence County Health Department (LCHD) Administrator Debbie Fisher says the dominant COVID-19 variant circulating now is KP.2. The more it spreads it changes, Fisher said. During the last two weeks of May, KP.2 was responsible for 28.5 percent of all COVID-19 cases. There are many strains of COVID-19, according to Fisher, who said it is likely to become like the flu and colds. A lot of colds are caused by coronavirus, Fisher said. As it circulates, it will become a lot like that. In March, the CDC provided guidance grouping COVID-19 with flu and other respiratory illnesses. They were all linked together in terms of how to deal with it, Fisher said. The greatest protection against COVID-19 is the vaccine, according to Fisher. Its a very good way to protect yourself against the disease being severe enough to be hospitalized or die, she said. Another way is to wash your hands frequently. When I was in nursing school, we learned the best way to stop disease is to wash your hands. Staying healthy, healthy eating, getting plenty of sleep and exercising regularly are all ways to prevent and/or minimize the impact of COVID-19. All the things we can do to protect ourselves every day are ways to help keep our immune system strong so that these germs dont hurt us as badly as they might otherwise, Fisher said. While she does not believe this strain will get any more severe than others, Fisher said the symptoms are the samestuffy nose, runny nose, cough, congestion and fever. Basically, they are the same as any other respiratory illness and for other COVIDs, she said. While the number of COVID-19 cases has dropped, there are still hospitalizations from it. Fisher said the Ohio Department of Health currently lists Lawrence County as 13th out of 88 counties in the state for the highest number of new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people. Since January 1, 2020, Lawrence County has had 28,022 COVID-19 cases, with 1,368 hospitalizations and 301 deaths. Thats from the onset of this, Fisher said. From Jan. 1, 2024, Lawrence County has had 814 COVID-19 cases, 21 hospitalizations and three deathsthe last one a couple of months back. This past week, Lawrence County had six COVID-19 cases. Thats pretty good, Fisher said. Its still more than wed like. Its probably not as many as what we might really have. When people self-test, they dont always call and let us know. Fisher said if someone has COVID-19 and goes to a doctor, providers are required by law to report that to the Health Department. She said there are messages on the LCHD website and Facebook page asking people if they test positive to let them know. Recalling the early days and months of the COVID-19 pandemic, Fisher said those who had it stayed in for 14 days. Now, the LCHD staff provides guidance based on the CDC recommendations released a few months ago. Stay home if youre having symptoms, Fisher said. If your symptoms are better after 24 hours and you are fever-free for 24 hours without using fever-reducing medicines, then you can go back to normal activities. The caveat with that is those who have COVID-19 should take precautions for the next five days. Wear a mask if youre able, Fisher said. If youre around a lot of people, thats probably a good idea. Fisher said after five days, a person who had COVID-19 is, typically, not contagious. The potential for serious illness and death, she said, is not as much as it was because so many more people are either vaccinated or they had it and have some resistance to it. For those who may have COVID-19 who self-test, their physician will likely want to conduct a confirmatory test. One course of action is for a physician to prescribe Paxlovid, the antiviral used for COVID-19 cases. Its amazing, Fisher said. I had COVID in 2021; I was so sick. I started Paxlovid and within 12 hours there was such a difference. Fisher said if someone gets COVID-19, the person should stay home, rest, treat the symptoms and reach out to a doctor for other treatments.

More here:

Health Department continues fight against COVID-19 - The Tribune | The Tribune - Ironton Tribune

Months after being diagnosed with COVID-19, one in five people are still suffering from symptoms, new research finds – ABC News

June 18, 2024

One in five adults infected with COVID-19 may still be suffering its effects months after their diagnosis, according to new research out of the United States.

An investigation by more than two dozen researchers found while the average time of recovery was 20 days, an estimated 22.5 per cent failed to recover 90 days after infection.

The report, based out of the United States and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, mirrored recent reporting by Australian researchers.

The peer-reviewed study used data from the Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R), a long-term collaboration of 14 different studies across the US.

Some of the studies have been following its own participants for up to 50 years, meaning they can now compare their health pre- and post-COVID-19 diagnosis.

A total of 4,708 participants were asked whether they were "completely recovered from COVID-19".

Once they confirmed their recovery, they were asked how long it had taken.

"[We] found that one in five adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 did not fully recover by three months post-infection in a racially and ethnically diverse US population-based sample," the report said.

"Recovery by 90 days was less likely in women and participants with pre-pandemic clinical cardiovascular disease.

"Vaccination prior to infection and infection during the Omicron variant wave were associated with greater recovery results were similar for reinfections."

The research team noted the results may have been limited by the self-reported recovery time and the "potential for measurement error, uncontrolled confounding and selection bias".

Dr Mulu Abraha Woldegiorgis, a researcher at the Australian National University (ANU), told the ABC it was "interesting" to see the findings classified by "before and after Omicron".

"The prevalence [of long COVID] during Omicron was the same as ours," she said.

"They use slightly different definitions and methodology, but even with that the prevalence was high. It shows us that long COVID is still a public health concern globally."

Four years after the beginning of the pandemic, much about "long COVID" remains a mystery for health officials.

According to the World Health Organization, long COVID "occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis."

Earlier this year Queensland's chief health officer called for the term "long COVID" to be scrapped despite stating the symptoms were "real".

"Using this term long COVID implies this virus has some unique, exceptional and sinister property that differentiates it form other viruses," Dr John Gerrard said.

"I want to make it clear that the symptoms that some patients describe after having COVID-19 are real. We believe they are real."

A study of more than 11,000 Australians who had tested positive for COVID-19 has had similar results almost one in five were still experiencing symptoms three months after a 2022 diagnosis.

The joint ANU and Western Australia Department of Health study, released in March, found 90 per cent of participants with long COVID were suffering multiple symptoms.

Tiredness, fatigue, "brain fog", sleep problems, coughing, and changes in their menstrual cycle were frequently reported.

"Among respondents with long COVID who had worked or studied prior to their infection, 15.2 per cent had reduced their number of hours, and 2.7 per cent had not returned to work at all," the report said.

The researchers also noted long COVID was more prevalent in its sample than the levels reported by other studies in the United Kingdom and Canada.

Dr Woldegiorgis was the lead researcher on the ANU report. She said Australia presented a "unique" cohort of highly vaccinated people.

"You have multiple symptoms, it's not just cough, or tiredness, they have multiple symptoms and that affects them," she said.

"A longer term assessment is important. What we saw was by 90 days, so a long term follow-up may provide additional information on how people are going in a year or two.

"What's the recovery period? Are they recovering soon or is the term longer?"

The report also found those who had been vaccinated were less at risk of developing long COVID.

"I want to stress the importance of vaccination," Dr Woldegiorgis said.

"In Australia the vast majority were vaccinated ... at least one dose prevents long COVID compared to no vaccination."

See the rest here:

Months after being diagnosed with COVID-19, one in five people are still suffering from symptoms, new research finds - ABC News

Top revelations from Faucis book, including conversations with Trump – The Washington Post

June 18, 2024

The call from President Donald Trump arrived at 9:30 Sunday morning, Nov. 1, 2020 two days before Election Day, when voters would decide whether Trump or challenger Joe Biden would occupy the White House.

Tony, I really like you but what the f--- are you doing? Trump told Anthony S. Fauci, according to the physicians new memoir, On Call: A Doctors Journey in Public Service.

For the next 15 minutes, the president aboard Air Force One mused about why Americans hated Fauci, mocked Bidens campaign as lackluster and vowed he would win reelection in a landslide. You really need to be positive you constantly drop bombs on me, Trump told Fauci.

The presidents anger had been stirred by Faucis interview with The Washington Post, in which the governments leading infectious-disease expert warned that coronavirus cases were surging again and called for the nation to abruptly change its response to save lives.

But the president ignored the most pointed criticism Fauci leveled in his interview with The Post, which was that the Biden campaign was taking covid-19 seriously from a public health perspective. Meanwhile, Trumps packed, maskless rallies were probably sources of viral spread, public health experts warned.

The call became the final conversation between the two native New Yorkers, Fauci writes a relationship that spanned the first year of the pandemic and became a source of national fascination.

It is just one of the revelations in Faucis 455-page memoir, which was published Tuesday.

On Call joins at least 16 other memoirs from former Trump and Biden officials that have attempted to explain the governments response to a pandemic that has killed more than 1 million Americans. Among them: books from former White House coronavirus coordinator Deborah Birx, former U.S. surgeon general Jerome Adams, former coronavirus testing coordinator Brett Giroir, and former White House adviser Scott Atlas. (Some of those memoirs have not sold well.)

None of those officials was Fauci the de facto face of the nations coronavirus response, as he acknowledges in his book.

This was good, in that I could both calm the countrys anxieties and provide factual information, Fauci writes. But it also led to the gross misperception, which only grew exponentially over time, that I was in charge of most or even all the federal governments response to the coronavirus.

Democrats ended up cheering Fauci for fact-checking the presidents claims sometimes in real time in White House meetings or briefings, where Trump repeatedly proclaimed that the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine could fight covid-19, despite Fauci and other scientists saying there was no evidence to support that. In his memoir, Fauci details other private clashes, such as an Oval Office briefing in August 2020 when he told Trump that the president was wrong to dismiss the value of coronavirus testing. Trump ignored Fauci and simply moved onto the next topic.

The episodes soured Republicans on Fauci, and conservative media increasingly portrayed him as Trumps antagonist and blamed him for the most stringent coronavirus responses, such as social distancing. The scrutiny continues today: A Senate hearing scheduled for Tuesday, co-led by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), one of Faucis fiercest critics, is expected to examine whether Faucis former agency played a role in funding risky virus research that contributed to the start of the pandemic a claim Fauci says is baseless.

Most of Faucis memoir is devoted to earlier episodes in his career, such as his work combating HIV/AIDS across four decades or the anthrax scares following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

He also recounts his interactions with previous presidents, such as an Oval Office meeting on Oct. 30, 1989, when he turned down then-President George H.W. Bushs offer to lead the National Institutes of Health, the United States premier scientific agency. Fauci said he preferred to remain director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a more hands-on role than leading the entire NIH. Fauci wound up holding that role until retiring from government in December 2022.

You son of a bitch, then-White House Chief of Staff John H. Sununu told Fauci after the meeting. Nobody says no to the president.

Those brushes with past leaders and experience saying no informed his interactions with the 45th president. Fauci writes that he first met Trump in September 2019 as the president signed an executive order to boost flu vaccine manufacturing an effort somewhat at odds with Trumps own beliefs. Trump told Fauci he had never received a flu vaccine until becoming president, because he never needed one.

Fauci was summoned to the White House to help lead the nations early coronavirus response in January 2020 partly because conservative political commentator Lou Dobbs, who had interviewed Fauci over the years, personally praised him to Trump.

Initially, the relationship between the president and the doctor was warm, in part because the two New Yorkers were able to relate to each other, Fauci writes. Even as anger grew over social distancing and other aspects of the governments response and conservative media lampooned Fauci Trump was the one person at the White House [who] continued to remain friendly to me, Fauci writes.

As the pandemic dragged on, Trump increasingly turned on his scientific adviser, saying he was too pessimistic, failing to inspire Americans.

In a June 2020 phone call, Trump screamed at Fauci for saying in a JAMA interview that the durability of coronavirus vaccines was uncertain and shots might be needed annually. The pronouncement coming on the heels of positive news about vaccine trials depressed the stock market, Trump asserted, costing the nation one trillion f---ing dollars.

President Trumps tendency to announce that he loved me and then scream at me on the phone well, lets just say that I found this to be out of the ordinary, Fauci writes in a chapter titled He loves me, he loves me not.

Masking was a repeated flash point. Fauci writes that Trump snapped at him before a May 2020 Rose Garden event when Fauci chose to wear a mask, with the president saying it would send the wrong signal to Americans watching at home. After Fauci insisted that he would stay masked, Trump ordered other officials such as Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to remove their face coverings.

Fauci also describes strange and confusing conversations with the president, who sometimes had a distorted view of the doctors government role. After Trump tested positive for the coronavirus in October 2020 and received an experimental antibody treatment, he insisted that Fauci should approve the treatment for all Americans. Fauci responded that it was a Food and Drug Administration regulatory issue, and he had no sway.

Faucis memoir includes criticism of Trumps deputies: that Vice President Mike Pence sometimes overdid his subservience to Trump; that White House economic adviser Peter Navarro could not accept reality about hydroxychloroquine; and that Atlas delivered exactly what the president wanted to hear rather than public health advice. He also details episodes when the Trump White House sought to muzzle or attack him by circulating opposition research, although he shares some praise for Jared Kushner, the presidents son-in law and White House senior adviser, writing that Kushner had good common sense and certainly was not a villain despite his frequent portrayal in the media.

Fauci is much warmer about Trumps Democratic opponents, writing that former president Barack Obama called to personally reassure him as Fauci faced scrutiny over his agencys funding of experiments involving dogs, and that Biden and his deputies embraced and empowered him. No opposition research directed at me with this group, he writes.

The book does not dwell on congressional investigations that continue to ensnare Fauci or address Faucis conversations with scientists early in the pandemic as they debated the possible lab origins of the virus. David Morens, a former NIH official being probed by Congress for deleting emails related to the coronavirus, is not mentioned in the book, although Fauci includes him among the dozens of officials he thanks in the acknowledgments. Fauci told Congress earlier this month that he did not have a close working relationship with Morens and criticized his decision to delete emails.

Fauci details threats on his life, such as when he opened a letter in August 2021 containing white powder and a dire message: MANDATORY LOCKDOWNS REAP WHAT YOU SOW. ENJOY YOUR GIFT. Testing confirmed that the powder was not hazardous, but Fauci and his family spent hours worried he had been exposed to a deadly toxin.

I do not fear death, Fauci writes. But I was not ready to leave this earth yet. Not by a long shot.

See the rest here:

Top revelations from Faucis book, including conversations with Trump - The Washington Post

COVID report card: A fuller pandemic review with teeth is needed – New York Daily News

June 18, 2024

At long last, New Yorkers have some more concrete insight into how the state conducted its COVID-19 emergency response in the crucial first two pandemic years in the form of a 262-page report from the firm Olson Group Ltd., commissioned in late 2022 by Gov. Hochul.

The study acknowledges much of what we already knew: preparations could be laid for a situation a bit like COVID, but no one could have predicted the scale and horrific contours of the emergency it created. Playbooks existed for the ramp-up of the disease up to a point, but beyond that it was uncharted territory.

Olson says that those best positioned to navigate these treacherous waters would have been a variety of bureaucrats and subject matter experts who had spent careers developing just such plans and emergency responses. Per the report, this is where things started really going off the rails, as former Gov. Andrew Cuomo decided to centralize decision-making, relying on executive orders to run the pandemic response out of his office.

Cuomos spokesman issued a statement on Twitter calling it ironic that the review found that in a time of unprecedented crisis, state government should vacate responsibility and delegate leadership. But the alternative wasnt to hand off COVID to some unknown; it was still part of Cuomos administration, so why not let it administer?

While Cuomos clear voice was welcome in a time of chaos, lower levels of his government still had a role. How is delegating tasks to his own agencies some kind of weak-willed abdication?

These lessons and others including the directive to improve access to health for marginalized populations overall, which were often left behind during the early pandemic in particular should be absorbed by decision-makers ahead of the unfortunately likely scenario of more highly infections and novel diseases.

And the report also hardly reckons with the thinking behind the biggest Cuomo-era COVID-related controversy the decision to make nursing homes accept COVID-19 patients discharged from hospitals in the early days of the pandemic. Yes, those were the peoples homes, but as we would learn, the nursing homes werent equipped to handle the infection. And then theres the matter of how to properly account for the deaths and where the deceased caught COVID. That also tripped up Cuomo and his aides.

Olson does delve into the nursing home matter, but does not answer crucial questions about who made that call or what went into it. Those are queries that still require more concrete answers.

Those answers about nursing homes and an understanding of why did the public health departments on the city and state level have their syndromic surveillance fail to flag COVID earlier, should come from a government review of the government response, by passing a state law to set up a formal commission, with subpoena power, a legal authority that Olson lacked.

The Olson report cost New York $4.3 million, or $16,500 in taxpayer money per page, including title and table of contents. Its real money, but COVID has killed more than 83,000 New Yorkers. Getting all the answers from a commission will be well worth whatever the price tag comes to be.

See the article here:

COVID report card: A fuller pandemic review with teeth is needed - New York Daily News

New York midwife pleads guilty to destroying 2600 COVID-19 vaccines and issuing fraudulent cards – Detroit News

June 18, 2024

detroitnews.com wants to ensure the best experience for all of our readers, so we built our site to take advantage of the latest technology, making it faster and easier to use.

Unfortunately, your browser is not supported. Please download one of these browsers for the best experience on detroitnews.com

Excerpt from:

New York midwife pleads guilty to destroying 2600 COVID-19 vaccines and issuing fraudulent cards - Detroit News

Too many children with long COVID are suffering in silence. Their greatest challenge? The myth that the virus is ‘harmless’ for kids – ABC News

June 16, 2024

Before she got sick with long COVID, Vivien* was at the top of all of her classes at school. She loved playing basketball and netball and running around with her dogs she'd even take herself for runs around her family's sprawling property in regional New South Wales, just for fun. She's still only 12 but for the longest time Vivien has dreamed of being a vet when she grows up. "And she was so social," her mother Katie* says. "My husband and I are both introverts. Not V she would party every day if she could."

Now, two years since she caught SARS-CoV-2 for the first time, a "good day" for Vivien looks nothing like it used to. She's always exhausted, but her achy limbs might feel less tingly and weak; perhaps her upset stomach is calm, and her brain fog has cleared enough that she can do some school work or call a friend. On a really good day, she can manage a visit with her grandparents, so long as she's prepared to spend the evening in bed. "Long COVID makes my body feel weak," Vivien says. "But I tell myself I am still powerful."

She's strong because she has to be. Like many kids with long COVID Vivien has seen a dizzying number of doctors, not all of whom have believed or helped her. She's made the tricky transition to homeschooling, learned to manage her turbulent symptoms with pacing and medication, cried fat tears of frustration after doing too much and wiping herself out.

"I want people to know that I'm not lying, [long COVID] is real and can happen to anyone," Vivien says. "I want people to know I'm not just trying to get out of doing school or sport I wish I could do sport I wish they understood I am just trying to save myself from being stuck in bed in pain for days afterwards."

More than four years after the first COVID patients began raising the alarm that they weren't getting better, scientists are still racing to unravel the mystery of why a significant minority of people develop debilitating chronic symptoms while others seem to recover just fine. But if the plight of adults with long COVID remains poorly understood, the millions of children who have it worldwide are practically invisible, their suffering and the formative years they're losing to this disease obscured by the myths that COVID is "harmless" for kids and the pandemic is "over".

In Australia, the lack of awareness is biting in shocking ways. Too many children with long COVID are being dismissed by doctors who say there's nothing they can do to help or worse, that their pain and fatigue is "all in their head". They're being pushed out of school by teachers who don't understand why they can't come to class or run around with their peers. Their parents have been gaslighted and blamed, too, not just by medical professionals but their closest friends and family. And experts are concerned that all this ignorance and apathy and the unwillingness of governments to do more to curb COVID transmission is exposing a generation of children to the same chronic illness and disability, with potentially devastating consequences.

"These kids' worlds just get very small, very quickly," says David Putrino, who runs a long COVID clinic as director of rehabilitation innovation for the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. "We see kids missing school, being unable to participate in sports, we see social isolation." Long COVID is "a lot more complicated and more brutal" for young people, he says adults tend to be better able to navigate the medical intricacies and politics of their illness. "I don't like comparative suffering as a concept but I do know that kids are having a harder time with it because people seem to be less understanding of it."

A crucial reason paediatric long COVID has been overlooked is that children generally suffer less severe acute infections than adults. Governments and public health agencies have also been "pushing the narrative" that the only negative possible outcome of catching COVID is death, Dr Putrino says. "We looked at the acute phase and said, 'This doesn't seem so bad for kids', and we forgot about the cumulative risks over time." It doesn't matter how mild your acute COVID infection is, he says: "You have the same risk of developing long COVID. And I say 'cumulative' because the latest data shows us that with every reinfection, your risk of long COVID increases."

Getting a handle on the scale of the problem is difficult because prevalence estimates of long COVID in children vary widely, though many researchers believe it likely affects 15 per cent of kids who catch the virus. While some experts have argued it is "rare" and not a concern for most families, others insist even 1 per cent is significant given huge swathes of the population are getting (re)infected and the impacts of long COVID are so severe. In the UK, for instance, the number of children reporting they have long COVID almost doubled in the year to March 2024, with nearly one in five revealing their symptoms limited their ability to undertake day-to-day activities "a lot".

As for what it looks like, long COVID can affect multiple organ systems and trigger a constellation of symptoms that can last for months or years: the most common are fatigue, including post-exertional malaise (PEM) or "crashing" after even light activity; cognitive dysfunction and headaches; gastrointestinal issues and allergic reactions; nerve and muscle pain; dysautonomia; and shortness of breath. These symptoms overlap with those of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, to the extent that many long COVID patients meet ME/CFS diagnostic criteria, their fatigue and PEM stopping them from living their normal lives well beyond six months.

And if the causes of long COVID sound complex, it's because they are. Researchers have zeroed in on several likely mechanisms, including viral persistence; inflammation and immune dysregulation; blood clotting and coagulation issues; organ damage; autoimmunity; reactivation of latent viruses like Epstein-Barr; and disrupted brainstem signalling.

Still, there is a serious lack of research on long COVID in children, particularly in Australia, which is concerning because, as a parliamentary inquiry last year heard, young people may be at greater risk of repeated infections as they spend so much time in crowded spaces like schools, and they have lower rates of vaccination than adults.

But identifying these kids in the first place can be challenging, raising concerns many are being missed or misdiagnosed. Doctors say it's common for children to present initially with gastrointestinal issues complaints of an upset stomach, usually and only with careful questioning does the full picture of their illness become clear. "It's surprising how profoundly long COVID can impact a child's life, and how much inquiry you have to do to actually work that out," says Michelle Scoullar, a Melbourne-based paediatrician at Clinic Nineteen, a specialist practice that sees long COVID patients by telehealth.

Because Dr Scoullar's patients are so resilient, she says, they'll often tell her at the start of an appointment that they're "doing okay", maybe even improving. But with deeper probing she'll discover that "okay" is anything but: they're not just struggling to get to school, they don't have the energy to get to the bathroom by themselves. "Improving" by their standards might mean they were able to spend 20 minutes at the dinner table one evening, but pretty much the rest of the week on the sofa or in bed. "We've got kids missing out on large chunks of their childhood," she says. "And the social, developmental and educational impacts of that can last years."

One of the things that shocks Dr Scoullar most, though, is how many of her patients have struggled with other doctors, especially paediatricians. Instead of kindness and support, she says, "They get judgement, ignorance and not just unhelpful advice, but incorrect and harmful advice. Many of the children I have seen have been told to just rest up, try a bit harder, get back to exercise. They're told, 'You're not doing enough and that's why you're feeling so tired'," she says. "And that's just completely unacceptable."

Katie learned that the hard way, riding a "rollercoaster of GPs" in the months after Vivien fell ill. The "biggest problem" is that many GPs don't understand what long COVD is, she says, and some are reluctant to refer to specialists.

The first GP they saw told Katie that "kids don't get long COVID" so she should just keep an eye on Vivien. Another listened as she explained her daughter's symptoms and insisted there was nothing wrong, it was "just a bad respiratory season". "We need to educate GPs because they're gatekeepers," Katie says. "Once we found a GP who was humble enough to admit she didn't know what was happening, things got better."

But specialists weren't much help, either. One of the two times Katie has cried about a doctor was after an appointment with a paediatric neurologist in Sydney, who she hoped would have answers for Vivien's headaches and lost sense of smell. Instead, the doctor shrugged and said there was nothing much she could do, just give it more time. Katie was stunned; she'd waited eight months and paid nearly $800 for the appointment she didn't need counselling on patience. "That was the day that broke me," she says. "We were walking back to the car, four hours from home, and I just could not stop crying. I desperately wanted that neurologist to be part of the solution. If we could just fix the headaches"

Mark Donohoe hears stories like these every week. An integrative GP who has been treating people with ME/CFS for 40 years, Dr Donohoe says a common stumbling block for kids with long COVID is that standard blood tests will often come back normal and many GPs and paediatricians don't know to check for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a type of dysautonomia common among long COVID patients that can cause a rapid increase in heart rate on standing, dizziness, headaches and fatigue. Delays in getting diagnosed can be costly, he says. "The longer you've been sick, the longer it takes to recover function."

But because research on long COVID is still emerging, time-poor doctors can lose their curiosity about what's happening for their patients, Dr Donohoe says, not realising supplements, medication and lifestyle interventions can dramatically improve their quality of life. They'll say, "It's long COVID, the official answer is there's nothing to do," he says. "And they tell the parents, 'Just get them up and get them active' and that's the advice that really exacerbates things." Because if a child who suffers from post-exertional malaise (PEM) is pushed beyond their capacity, they can deteriorate rapidly.

Crucially, PEM isn't "normal" fatigue; it's not just feeling tired after a big day or a sign a child is out of shape. It's a worsening of symptoms after physical or cognitive activity a failure of the immune system and metabolism to meet energy demands. It also looks different in every patient: some can't brush their teeth without triggering it, while others might be able to get to school but then suffer a crash that lasts for days as a result. And for many people with long COVID and ME/CFS, exercise is a sure-fire way to provoke PEM, which is why clinical guidelines in the US and UK advise doctors not to recommend it without strict supervision.

Australian guidelines seem to be stuck in the past. The current clinical guidelines have faced sustained criticism for promoting graded exercise therapy since they were published in 2002. And the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' new guidance on incremental physical activity for ME/CFS points to the controversial PACE trial a 2011 study that claimed patients who did graded exercise and psychotherapy made impressive recoveries but does not mention its methodology was found to be flawed and its findings exaggerated.

RACGP President Nicole Higgins says the guide clearly states that "this approach will not be suitable for all patients" and "does not purport to be a guideline for the comprehensive management" of ME/CFS. But patients and advocacy groups have argued it ignores the science of PEM and downplays the risk of harm to people who suffer it.

Graded exercise therapy can be appropriate for some children with long COVID and ME/CFS, says Todd Davenport, a physical therapist and exercise scientist at the University of the Pacific in California. But "it really takes a clinician who is familiar with long COVID to first determine when working out will not work out".

Instead of guiding patients to exercise, Dr Davenport says, GPs should first establish whether PEM is a problem, then look at treating its underlying causes. "I always suggest referring to experts who are in the best position to help the patient and also to support the GP," he says. If they determine that exercise could be helpful, he says, it should be closely monitored to avoid triggering PEM.

Aside from prescribing unqualified exercise, Dr Donohoe says one of the "worst" decisions a doctor can make about a child with long COVID is that there's nothing wrong with them and "they need to see a psychologist". For one thing, it ignores the thousands of peer reviewed studies documenting the disease processes of long COVID. But it's a pivotal moment, he says, "where what we're really saying in medicine is, 'We haven't got a clue what's going on but this may make you feel better'. I think that's the point where [conditions like long COVID and ME/CFS] get converted into a psychological or psychiatric disorder."

Sometimes that conversion happens terrifyingly fast. For three months after Jack* caught COVID last May he was in and out of the emergency department at a Perth hospital with 10 out of 10 stomach pain and fatigue so crushing he couldn't walk.

Now aged 13, Jack was a fit and talented athlete whose life revolved around sports, especially cricket, rugby and tennis. It's a major reason his father Brett* was so shocked when, during one of their visits to the hospital, a neurologist performed a few reflex tests on Jack, concluded his nerves were fine, then announced his symptoms were psychological.

"He said, 'Listen, it's all in your son's head, he has something called FND functional neurological disorder'," says Brett. "I said, 'Is that psychosomatic?' and he said, 'Well, we don't call it that anymore'." Brett now knows that FND is a controversial diagnosis that should only be made after excluding other possible medical conditions. Numerous long COVID patients have reported being misdiagnosed with FND a precarious situation, experts say, because it can block their access to testing and treatment. But Jack was devastated. "He was crying because he's the kid who goes to rugby with a migraine he'll push through anything," Brett says. "So for the neurologist to say it was all in his head, I think that broke him a bit."

A couple of months later, having dug deep into the research on long COVID, Brett took Jack to Europe, where he underwent several cycles of an expensive blood filtering treatment called H.E.L.P. apheresis. The enormous cost about $30,000 all up should have ruled the trip out, but with the generous support of family and friends, they raised enough money to go.

Brett felt sure it was the best next step; taking vitamins and supplements helped Jack to a point, but his progress had stalled, and local doctors weren't offering anything other than paracetamol. "We were reaching the six-month mark and I knew we had to act quickly," Brett says. "[Jack] is a really, really good sportsman, I didn't want him to live with a disability."

For long COVID patients, apheresis involves removing the blood, filtering it of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins and so-called microclots that may be clogging capillaries and stopping oxygen from getting to tissues, then returning it to the body. The microclot hypothesis as a driver of long COVID remains just that, and some experts have warned there is little published evidence showing apheresis is an effective treatment. While some patients say it has helped them almost fully recover, others have reported it made no difference or in some cases made them worse, so those who decide to have it are gambling that it will work.

Jack made a remarkable recovery. "I got a lot better like, 90 per cent better," he says. "I was able to play tennis and go surfing and all of that." He's since suffered a disappointing relapse but his symptoms aren't as bad as they were before apheresis. In all, it was a positive experience, says Brett, who is "seriously considering" another trip overseas.

Still, he's frustrated that he felt forced to pursue an unapproved treatment on the other side of the world and that most doctors' understanding of long COVID lags so far behind the science. "It's been really tough to sit on the margins of what people think is conspiracy and what is science and logic," he says. "Even some of my closest friends have been fighting me on it unwilling to engage in the conversation, simply because it went against the narrative."

But then ignorance and judgement can often be found in the most unlikely places. Leah's* son Sam* had been struggling with long COVID and POTS for about six months when his Sydney public high school rang her to say he wasn't meeting attendance requirements and would need to switch to distance education.

At that point Sam was pushing himself to get through two or three classes a day, even though it seemed to be making him sicker he was desperate not to fall behind academically and, like most teenagers, loved spending time with his friends. "His number-one goal is just to be back at school," Leah says. But although his doctors have provided medical certificates, "the whole way along the school has acted suspiciously, as if he's just avoiding school for the sake of it."

One complicating factor is that Sam often appears fine there's a reason complex chronic conditions like long COVID and ME/CFS are called "invisible" illnesses. Other people don't realise that basic activities drain his energy and flare his symptoms, says Leah, who quit her full-time job to look after him. "Just going up the stairs is hard, he can't shower every day, and when he's not at school he spends most of his time in bed. But if someone comes for a quick visit he can still be pretty witty he masks his symptoms so well so they assume he's fine."

Even close family and friends don't truly get it. "We've been told that COVID is over and everyone just wants to ignore it and pretend it's not there," Leah says. "If it was cancer, people would be checking in and have some level of understanding. But long COVID is this slightly difficult topic that everyone avoids."

After deciding that distance education wasn't going to suit Sam and that his school's attempt to push him out was "totally inappropriate" Leah was on the phone to one of the principals one day when she casually mentioned that she'd sought legal advice to better understand their options. "It was like I'd dropped a bomb," she says. They were suddenly happy to make accommodations and allow Sam to keep coming on a reduced schedule, she says one lesson a day.

Things have since calmed down, but for a while Sam's teachers kept pushing him to try harder, to do more, Leah says, which just piled on even more pressure. "They also didn't properly brief all his teachers. At one stage one suggested in front of the whole class that he was just acting like a bit of a rebel."

Accounts like these are disturbingly common: parents in several states say kids are being made to do vigorous exercise in PE class, urged to stay at school longer than their doctors advise, and refused special provisions for exams. In Dr Donohoe's experience, public schools are generally better than private schools at supporting young people with long COVID and ME/CFS, even in simple ways like finding them quiet spaces to lay down and rest when they need to.

Dr Scoullar has noticed similar patterns. Too often her long COVID patients tell her that their inability to get to school or stay for a full day is "a barrier that schools are very unwilling to work around", she says. "And I have heard of at least a few children who have been asked to leave because they are no longer meeting the school's requirements."

For some students, shifting to distance education is a positive change because it gives them more control over their time and energy. But Sam wouldn't have coped well with the social isolation. "The whole thing has been utterly devastating on so many levels," Leah says of her son's illness. "I'm grieving for the life that he's lost and the life he should be living, because he's missing his teenage years. And I try to be positive; I do believe he can recover. But there are just so many unknowns and so many battles I'm constantly in battles with the school, to get medical letters, and continually having to advocate for him."

It's one of the greatest challenges children with long COVID and their families are grappling with: not knowing when or if they'll recover. Tied to that is the financial pressure so many parents are under: between healthcare appointments, medication and supplements, some are stretching their budgets to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars every month in hopeful bids to get their kids well.

For others who can barely afford to buy groceries, just getting to a GP is out of the question, so thinking about the future is frightening. "You live with this fear of, what's going to happen? What if I have a heart attack or lose more function," says Amy*, who has two kids with ME/CFS and long COVID and also has long COVID herself. "Probably my biggest fear is that this is life from now on."

Some children do recover over time, says Dr Putrino, whose clinic recommends various different therapeutic approaches: autonomic rehabilitation strategies like breathwork and gentle exercise to calm and regulate the nervous system, pacing to manage energy levels, and medication and supplements to target particular symptoms. "In other cases we struggle. Unfortunately, we have a handful of bed-bound patients that no matter what we try, we just can't seem to move the needle," he says. "And so we just do what we always do with any patient whether it be a stroke, or a traumatic brain injury or a long COVID adult we say, 'We're here with you, and we're going to keep trying different things, there's lots of different things to try, and we're just going to try and find the balance'."

While the world waits for clinical trials to shed light on effective treatments, patients say doctors must get up to speed on long COVID at a minimum, GPs need comprehensive guidelines and training on how to diagnose and help patients manage their illness. The final report of Australia's parliamentary inquiry into long COVID recommended the same.

In its response, however, the government merely acknowledged the critical role of primary care providers and did not commit any additional resources for addressing the issues raised. RACGP President Nicole Higgins says funding for the National Clinical Evidence Taskforce's COVID guidelines has also been discontinued. "The RACGP has advocated for government funding for the establishment of living guidelines across a range of topics," she says, "and this is a case study for why such funding is so necessary."

Some experts are also concerned about Australia's COVID vaccine strategy given evidence suggests that vaccination reduces the risk of long COVID, including in young people. The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) has previously recommended children aged five and over receive a primary course but now recommends that those under 18 not be vaccinated unless they are at increased risk of severe disease.

"ATAGI's current recommendations acknowledge that overall, severe COVID-19 in children is extremely rare, even among unvaccinated children and those with underlying conditions," a spokesperson for the Department of Health told ABC News. "ATAGI will continue to monitor and review all emerging evidence on the use of COVID-19 vaccines, including the emerging evidence on long COVID as appropriate."

For Dr Putrino, one of the biggest hurdles remains the misconception that children don't suffer long-term consequences after catching the virus. "I think that there's an enormous amount of education that needs to happen to inform parents that yes, your kid can get long COVID. Yes, it could be the reason why they're struggling in school right now," he says. "Get it checked out don't sit around and just assume that they're going through puberty or they're just extra moody; don't sleep on it. Make sure that a doctor evaluates them. Make sure it's a doctor that's knowledgeable and educated about long COVID."

He also worries that not enough is being done to prevent COVID transmission in the community, particularly in schools. Governments could be scrambling to improve indoor air quality with good ventilation, air purifiers and far UV light, he says. But for the most part their approach has been to just let the virus rip and watch the numbers of people with long COVID rise. "I just worry we're going to have a generation of kids who have a post-acute infection syndrome because we failed to protect them," Dr Putrino says, "because we told this lie over and over again that kids have nothing to worry about with COVID."

It's one of the things Katie is most angry about: that Vivien caught COVID at school before she was able to be fully vaccinated. Her quality of life has improved "out of sight" in the two years since then, she says, largely because they finally found a compassionate paediatrician and a couple of other specialists who understand her illness, who want to help.

"But I can see a world where I'd have to be a full-time carer," she says. "That's the thing that's really starting to scare me, is: what does the future look like? All V wants to do is be a vet that's all she's wanted since she was five. But what if she can't? I'm trying to make decisions about our finances now so that we can help her in the future, because I can't imagine that she's ever going to get back to 100 per cent, at least not at this trajectory."

And that, she says, is what most people fail to understand about long COVID: how serious it is, how much is at stake how fast a healthy girl with boundless energy and big dreams can lose it all. "They think it's incredibly rare, or they don't understand that just because you had one 'nice' bout of COVID doesn't mean the next one isn't going to do permanent damage," Katie says. "People just underestimate it; they assume it won't happen to them and if it does, that someone will be there to help them."

*Names have been changed at families' request so they could speak frankly without fear of reprisal.

Read the original post:

Too many children with long COVID are suffering in silence. Their greatest challenge? The myth that the virus is 'harmless' for kids - ABC News

Two Covid Theories – The New York Times

June 16, 2024

The origin of the Covid virus remains the pandemics biggest mystery. Did the virus jump to human beings from animals being sold at a food market in Wuhan, China? Or did the virus leak from a laboratory in Wuhan?

U.S. officials remain divided. The F.B.I. and the Department of Energy each concluded that a lab leak was the more likely cause. The National Intelligence Council and some other agencies believe that animal-to-human transmission is more likely. The C.I.A. has not taken a position. The question remains important partly because it can inform the strategies to reduce the chances of another horrific pandemic.

A recent Times Opinion essay by Alina Chan, a biologist refocused attention on the issue by making the case for the lab-leak theory. In todays newsletter, Ill try to lay out the clearest arguments for each side to help you decide which you consider more likely.

1. Its the norm.

Covid is part of the coronavirus family, so named because the virus contains a protein shaped like a spike. (Corona is the Latin word for crown.) In recent decades, the main way that coronaviruses have infected people is through animal-to-human transmission, which is also known as natural transmission.

The SARS virus, for example, appears to have jumped from civet cats, a relative of the mongoose, to humans in Asia in 2002. MERS seems to have jumped from camels to people in the Middle East around 2012. There is no previous example of a major coronavirus originating with a lab leak.

When youre trying to choose between a historically common explanation for a phenomenon and an unusual explanation, the common one is usually the better bet.

Read this article:

Two Covid Theories - The New York Times

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax drive to undermine China during Covid-19 pandemic, Reuters probe shows – The Straits Times

June 16, 2024

To Washingtons alarm, Chinas offers of assistance were tilting the geopolitical playing field across the developing world, including in the Philippines, where the government faced upwards of 100,000 infections in the early months of the pandemic.

The US relationship with Manila had grown tense after the 2016 election of Mr Duterte.

A staunch critic of the US, he had threatened to cancel a key pact that allowed the US military to maintain legal jurisdiction over American troops stationed in the country.

Mr Duterte said in a July 2020 speech that he had made a plea to Mr Xi for the Philippines to be at the front of the line as China rolled out vaccines.

He vowed in the same speech that the Philippines would no longer challenge Beijings aggressive expansion in the South China Sea, upending a key security understanding Manila had long held with Washington.

China is claiming it. We are claiming it. China has the arms, we do not have it. Mr Duterte said. So, it is simple as that.

Days later, Chinas foreign minister announced Beijing would grant Mr Dutertes plea for priority access to the vaccine, as part of a new highlight in bilateral relations.

Chinas growing influence fuelled efforts by US military leaders to launch the secret propaganda operation Reuters uncovered.

We didnt do a good job sharing vaccines with partners, a senior US military officer directly involved in the campaign in South-east Asia told Reuters. So what was left to us was to throw shade on Chinas.

US military leaders feared that Chinas Covid-19 diplomacy and propaganda could draw other South-east Asian countries, such as Cambodia and Malaysia, closer to Beijing, furthering its regional ambitions.

A senior US military commander responsible for South-east Asia, Special Operations Command Pacific General Jonathan Braga, pressed his bosses in Washington to fight back in the so-called information space, according to three former Pentagon officials.

The commander initially wanted to punch back at Beijing in South-east Asia.

The goal: to ensure the region understood the origin of Covid-19 while promoting scepticism towards what were then still-untested vaccines offered by a country that they said had lied continually since the start of the pandemic.

A spokesperson for Special Operations Command declined to comment.

At least six senior State Department officials responsible for the region objected to this approach.

A health crisis was the wrong time to instil fear or anger through a psychological operation, or psyop, they argued during Zoom calls with the Pentagon.

Were stooping lower than the Chinese and we should not be doing that, said a former senior State Department official for the region who fought against the military operation.

While the Pentagon saw Washingtons rapidly diminishing influence in the Philippines as a call to action, the withering partnership led American diplomats to plead for caution.

The relationship is hanging by a thread, another former senior US diplomat recounted. Is this the moment you want to do a psyop in the Philippines? Is it worth the risk?

In the past, such opposition from the State Department might have proved fatal to the programme.

Previously in peacetime, the Pentagon needed the approval of embassy officials before conducting psychological operations in a country, often hamstringing commanders seeking to counter Beijings messaging, three former Pentagon officials told Reuters.

But in 2019, before Covid-19 surfaced in full force, then-Secretary of Defence Mark Esper signed a secret order that later paved the way for the launch of the US military propaganda campaign.

The order elevated the Pentagons competition with China and Russia to the priority of active combat, enabling commanders to sidestep the State Department when conducting psyops against those adversaries.

The Pentagon spending Bill passed by Congress that year also explicitly authorised the military to conduct clandestine influence operations against other countries, even outside of areas of active hostilities.

Mr Esper, through a spokesperson, declined to comment. A State Department spokesperson referred questions to the Pentagon.

In spring 2020, special ops commander Gen Braga turned to a cadre of psychological-warfare soldiers and contractors in Tampa to counter Beijings Covid-19 efforts.

Colleagues say Gen Braga was a long-time advocate of increasing the use of propaganda operations in global competition.

In trailers and squat buildings at a facility on Tampas MacDill Air Force Base, US military personnel and contractors would use anonymous accounts on X, Facebook and other social media to spread what became an anti-vax message.

The facility remains the Pentagons clandestine propaganda factory.

Psychological warfare has played a role in US military operations for more than a hundred years, although it has changed in style and substance over time.

So-called psyopers were best known following World War II for their supporting role in combat missions across Vietnam, Korea and Kuwait, often dropping leaflets to confuse the enemy or encourage their surrender.

After the Al-Qaeda attacks of 2001, the US was fighting a borderless, shadowy enemy, and the Pentagon began to wage a more ambitious kind of psychological combat previously associated only with the CIA.

The Pentagon set up front news outlets, paid off prominent local figures, and sometimes funded television soap operas in order to turn local populations against militant groups or Iranian-backed militias, former national security officials told Reuters.

Unlike earlier psyop missions, which sought specific tactical advantage on the battlefield, the post-9/11 operations hoped to create broader change in public opinion across entire regions.

By 2010, the military began using social media tools, leveraging phony accounts to spread messages of sympathetic local voices themselves often secretly paid by the United States government.

As time passed, a growing web of military and intelligence contractors built online news websites to pump US-approved narratives into foreign countries.

Today, the military employs a sprawling ecosystem of social media influencers, front groups and covertly placed digital advertisements to influence overseas audiences, according to current and former military officials.

Chinas efforts to gain geopolitical clout from the pandemic gave Gen Braga justification to launch the propaganda campaign that Reuters uncovered, sources said.

By summer 2020, the militarys propaganda campaign moved into new territory and darker messaging, ultimately drawing the attention of social media executives.

In regions beyond South-east Asia, senior officers in the US Central Command, which oversees military operations across the Middle East and Central Asia, launched their own version of the Covid-19 psyop, three former military officials told Reuters.

Although the Chinese vaccines were still months from release, controversy roiled the Muslim world over whether the vaccines contained pork gelatin and could be considered haram, or forbidden under Islamic law.

Sinovac has said that the vaccine was manufactured free of porcine materials. Many Islamic religious authorities maintained that even if the vaccines did contain pork gelatin, they were still permissible since the treatments were being used to save human life.

The Pentagon campaign sought to intensify fears about injecting a pig derivative.

As part of an internal investigation at X, the social media company used IP addresses and browser data to identify more than 150 phony accounts that were operated from Tampa by US Central Command and its contractors, according to an internal X document reviewed by Reuters.

Can you trust China, which tries to hide that its vaccine contains pork gelatin and distributes it in Central Asia and other Muslim countries where many people consider such a drug haram? read an April 2021 tweet sent from a military-controlled account identified by X.

The Pentagon also covertly spread its messages on Facebook and Instagram, alarming executives at parent company Meta who had long been tracking the military accounts, according to former military officials.

One military-created meme targeting Central Asia showed a pig made out of syringes, according to two people who viewed the image. Reuters found similar posts that traced back to US Central Command.

One showed a Chinese flag as a curtain separating Muslim women in hijabs and pigs stuck with vaccine syringes. In the centre is a man with syringes; on his back is the word China.

It targeted Central Asia, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, a country that distributed tens of millions of doses of Chinas vaccines and participated in human trials.

Translated into English, the X post read: China distributes a vaccine made of pork gelatin.

Facebook executives had first approached the Pentagon in the summer of 2020, warning the military that Facebook workers had easily identified the militarys phony accounts, according to three former US officials and another person familiar with the matter.

The government, Facebook argued, was violating Facebooks policies by operating the bogus accounts and by spreading Covid-19 misinformation.

The military argued that many of its fake accounts were being used for counterterrorism and asked Facebook not to take down the content, according to two people familiar with the exchange.

The Pentagon pledged to stop spreading Covid-19-related propaganda, and some of the accounts continued to remain active on Facebook.

Nonetheless, the anti-vax campaign continued into 2021 as Mr Biden took office.

Angered that military officials had ignored their warning, Facebook officials arranged a Zoom meeting with Mr Bidens new National Security Council shortly after the inauguration, Reuters learnt. The discussion quickly became tense.

It was terrible, said a senior administration official describing the reaction after learning of the campaigns pig-related posts. I was shocked. The administration was pro-vaccine and our concern was this could affect vaccine hesitancy, especially in developing countries.

By spring 2021, the National Security Council (NSC) ordered the military to stop all anti-vaccine messaging.

We were told we needed to be pro-vaccine, pro all vaccines, said a former senior military officer who helped oversee the programme.

Even so, Reuters found some anti-vax posts that continued through April and other deceptive Covid-19-related messaging that extended into that summer.

Reuters could not determine why the campaign didnt end immediately with the NSCs order. In response to questions from Reuters, the NSC declined to comment.

The senior Defence Department official said that those complaints led to an internal review in late 2021, which uncovered the anti-vaccine operation.

The probe also turned up other social and political messaging that was many, many leagues away from any acceptable military objective. The official would not elaborate. The review intensified the following year, the official said, after a group of academic researchers at Stanford University flagged some of the same accounts as pro-Western bots in a public report.

The high-level Pentagon review was first reported by the Washington Post, which also reported that the military used fake social media accounts to counter Chinas message that Covid-19 came from the United States.

But the Post report did not reveal that the programme evolved into the anti-vax propaganda campaign uncovered by Reuters.

The senior defence official said the Pentagon has rescinded parts of Mr Espers 2019 order that allowed military commanders to bypass the approval of US ambassadors when waging psychological operations.

The rules now mandate that military commanders work closely with US diplomats in the country where they seek to have an impact.

The policy also restricts psychological operations aimed at broad population messaging, such as those used to promote vaccine hesitancy during Covid-19.

The Pentagons audit concluded that the militarys primary contractor handling the campaign, General Dynamics IT, had employed sloppy tradecraft, taking inadequate steps to hide the origin of the fake accounts, said a person with direct knowledge of the review.

The review also found that military leaders didnt maintain enough control over its psyop contractors, the person said.

A spokesperson for General Dynamics IT declined to comment.

Nevertheless, the Pentagons clandestine propaganda efforts are set to continue.

In an unclassified strategy document in 2023, top Pentagon generals wrote that the US military could undermine adversaries such as China and Russia using disinformation spread across social media, false narratives disguised as news, and similar subversive activities weaken societal trust by undermining the foundations of government

And in February, the contractor that worked on the anti-vax campaign General Dynamics IT won a US$493 million (S$667.5 million) contract. Its mission: to continue providing clandestine influence services for the military. REUTERS

Excerpt from:

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax drive to undermine China during Covid-19 pandemic, Reuters probe shows - The Straits Times

Page 19«..10..18192021..3040..»