Category: Corona Virus

Page 109«..1020..108109110111..120130..»

COVID-19 can interfere with your period in many ways. Here’s how. – National Geographic

November 19, 2023

Raven La Fae, a 32-year-old artist in Calgary, Canada, has always been able to predict their menstrual periods almost to the day; it arrived every 28 days and lasted for five. But after contracting COVID-19 in late 2020, thats no longer the case.

La Faes bout with the disease lasted for two miserable weeks. A menstrual cycle landed expectedly during that time, but what was shocking to them was how long the bleeding continued10 days.

My period has been funky ever since, La Fae laments, and after another round of COVID-19 it became even less predictable. While the days between cycles have mostly returned to baseline, the number of days of bleeding have not, lasting up to 10 days a month.

From the beginning of the pandemic, women worldwide noticed changes to their menstrual cycles. In some cases, this happened after contracting the virus; in others, after receiving a vaccine. With so many people recording their cycles in period-tracking apps, researchers have been able to document the phenomenon.

Initially, many physicians were taken off guard. La Faes healthcare provider, after determining hormone levels were normal, said she couldnt explain it. People complained their doctors dismissed their hunch the virus might be linked to disrupted cycles.

When COVID started we were worried about people dying, so other things were overlooked, admits Hugh Taylor, chair of obstetrics and gynecology at Yale Medicine. In retrospect, Taylor says, patients should have been alerted to this possibility. We see irregular menstrual cycles with other acute infections, so it isnt surprising it happens here.

Without research or reassurance from physicians, women were alarmed by the deviations in their periods, Taylor says, and for good reason: Weve been warning people for years that changes in a period might be a symptom of a hormonal imbalance, or even cancer.

When girls and women noticed unexpected shifts in their cycle after receiving a COVID-19 shot, some second-guessed their decision to get a vaccine, says Candace Tingen, a program director at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which awarded $1.67 million to five research institutions to study the issue.

Tingen points out that her institute has long emphasized the importance of menstrual cycles to health. We talk about it as a fifth vital sign, she says (the other four being body temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and respiration).

Most concerning to younger women was whether these changes could reduce fertility, Taylor says.

It wasnt until early 2022two years into the pandemicthat a study of 2,000 American couples published in the American Journal of Epidemiologyresolved the question. Women trying to conceive whod had the virus saw no decrease in fertility. Similarly, the COVID shot had no impact on conception rates.

Several NIH-funded studies have confirmed that COVID does alters cycle lengths in many women, albeit only briefly.

Thousands of reproductive-age women using a period tracking app reported that the time between their periods expanded by more than a day in the month following infection or vaccination, which for most returned to normal the following cycle, researchers reported in August.

Another study of 127 women of childbearing-age in Arizona who had contracted COVID found 16 percent reported some alteration; most common were irregular cycles or longer gaps between bleeds. These shifts were more likely in those whose infection involved more symptoms or was more severe (but not to the point of hospitalization).

Women in this study also had increases in the premenstrual syndrome symptoms of mood changes and fatigue.

We think of the menstrual period as an acute event that occurs for a few days, but hormones are changing throughout the entire cycle, explains Leslie Farland, an epidemiology professor at the University of Arizona and the studys principal investigator.

A large study published in June focused on COVID vaccinations confirmed that here too the number of days between periods increases by about a day during the month of vaccination, but returns to normal after.

That aligns with a prior study tracking 4,000 U.S. women who used one period tracking app and found that, for the vast majority of women, cycles shifted slightly and temporarily; however, the length of bleeding didnt change, says Alison Edelman, an obstetrician and gynecologist at Oregon Health and Science University and the studys principal investigator. A second study by Edelman, of nearly 20,000 women in North America and Europe using the same app reported similar findings.

Still, ten percent of the women in Edelmans study saw their period shift by more than a week after getting the shot. However, these women were also largely back to normal the following month.

None of these studies explain situations like La Faes, where menstrual cycles are changed significantly and persistently.

Exactly how the coronavirus or vaccine affects the menstrual cycle isnt clear.

One hypothesis posits that COVID-19 may affect whats known as the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. To begin each monthly cycle, the hypothalamus gland signals the pituitary gland to secrete two hormones that together release an egg from the ovaries.

Its possible the coronavirus affects the hypothalamus directly, Taylor says, but the body may also proactively decrease the activity of these glands if the virus is detected. This has evolutionary advantages, because you dont want to get pregnant when youre fighting off a physical stressor, which could be an illness or malnutrition or the like, he explains.

Alternatively, the immune system engaged in fighting the virus could alter the normal inflammatory response of the uterine lining (endometrium) during the cycle.This may be why people who experienced a more intense bout of COVIDindicating a higher viral load and more immune activityhave higher rates of menstrual changes, as the University of Arizona study found.

That was the case for Annette Gillaspie, a 41-year-old registered nurse in Hillsboro, Oregon, who contracted COVID in 2020 and was extremely ill for more than two weeks. She has since experienced long COVID symptoms, including a fluctuating heart rate and fatigue so extreme a shower can send her to bed for days. Her periods are unusually long and heavygushing for almost two weeks some monthsand even having a hormonal intrauterine device inserted didnt reduce the bleeding as it normally does. At some point, she says, shell likely have to undergo a hysterectomy.

Vaccines trigger the bodys immune system response, albeit a smaller one than the disease, so the same mechanisms could be involved in their temporary menstrual cycle disruptions, Tingen says.

Disseminating this reassuring information to women so they know to expect this possible side effect is an important public health task, Tingen says.

Anyone whose cycle remains significantly altered for several months, however, should check with their healthcare provider, Taylor says. My suspicion is that people on the cusp of a medical conditionthyroid abnormalities, hormonal irregularities, bleeding from fibroidsmight be pushed over the edge by the coronavirus or COVID vaccine.

Edelman hopes this will be a teaching moment for her profession. Menstrual health has been woefully understudied, not just in vaccine trials but in almost every area of research, she says. Yet half the population will, does, or has menstruated, and this routine biological function has meaning for the individual and for science.

Go here to see the original:

COVID-19 can interfere with your period in many ways. Here's how. - National Geographic

Post-COVID-19 Demyelinating Disease and Its Effect on the Lower … – Cureus

November 19, 2023

Specialty

Please choose I'm not a medical professional. Allergy and Immunology Anatomy Anesthesiology Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Cardiology Critical Care Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes and Endocrinology Emergency Medicine Epidemiology and Public Health Family Medicine Forensic Medicine Gastroenterology General Practice Genetics Geriatrics Health Policy Hematology HIV/AIDS Hospital-based Medicine I'm not a medical professional. Infectious Disease Integrative/Complementary Medicine Internal Medicine Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Medical Education and Simulation Medical Physics Medical Student Nephrology Neurological Surgery Neurology Nuclear Medicine Nutrition Obstetrics and Gynecology Occupational Health Oncology Ophthalmology Optometry Oral Medicine Orthopaedics Osteopathic Medicine Otolaryngology Pain Management Palliative Care Pathology Pediatrics Pediatric Surgery Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Podiatry Preventive Medicine Psychiatry Psychology Pulmonology Radiation Oncology Radiology Rheumatology Substance Use and Addiction Surgery Therapeutics Trauma Urology Miscellaneous

See more here:

Post-COVID-19 Demyelinating Disease and Its Effect on the Lower ... - Cureus

COVID-19 pandemic has triggered cognitive decline in over 50s – Diabetes.co.uk

November 19, 2023

Cognitive complications in adults aged 50 or over are more common since the coronavirus pandemic, academics have said.

Researchers have found that older adults are now at higher risk of developing memory problems because of COVID-19, even if they never caught the virus.

Around the world, nearly 780 million people have been infected with the coronavirus, with many cases resulting in death.

The study has discovered that cognitive decline in older adults was the fastest between March 2020 and February 2021 the first year of the pandemic.

Peoples lifestyles completely changed during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the lockdowns and restrictions.

According to the findings, cognitive decline is associated with a number of factors associated with the coronavirus, including a higher alcohol consumption, an increase in loneliness and depression and a fall in exercise, as well as the effects of the disease itself.

Lead author Anne Corbett said: Our findings suggest that lockdowns and other restrictions we experienced during the pandemic have had a real lasting impact on brain health in people aged 50 or over, even after the lockdowns ended.

This raises the important question of whether people are at a potentially higher risk of cognitive decline, which can lead to dementia.

She added: It is now more important than ever to make sure we are supporting people with early cognitive decline, especially because there are things they can do to reduce their risk of dementia later on. She advised people concerned about their memory to see their GP.

Our findings also highlight the need for policymakers to consider the wider health impacts of restrictions like lockdowns when planning for a future pandemic response.

During the investigation, the team of researchers assessed the cognitive ability of 3,142 adults who took part in the Protect study by looking at the results of a brain function test they completed before, during and after the pandemic.

They found that people experienced the quickest decline in their memory during the first year of the pandemic.

The authors said: We found that people aged 50 years and older in the UK had accelerated decline in executive function and working memory during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, during which the UK was subjected to three societal lockdowns for a total period of six months.

Notably, however, this worsening in working memory persisted in the second year of the pandemic, after the social restrictions had eased.

They added: The scale of change is also of note, with all groups the whole cohort and the individual subgroups showing more than a 50% greater decline in working memory and executive function.

As such, there is a clear need to address these changes in lifestyle behaviour as a public health priority, and on the basis of the patterns of associations seen in the current study, we would hypothesise that interventions targeting these behaviours could benefit cognition.

Professor Dag Aarsland said: This study adds to the knowledge of the longstanding health consequences of COVID-19, in particular for vulnerable people such as older people with mild memory problems.

Dr Dorina Cadar said: The new findings from the Protect study indicate domain-specific cognitive changes for individuals with a history of COVID-19 that mirrored similar trajectories for those with mild cognitive impairment but with a slightly lower rate of decline.

This study also highlights reduced exercise, alcohol use, depression, and loneliness as key risk factors that affected the rates of cognitive decline in the older population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The study was published in the Lancet Healthy Longevity journal.

Excerpt from:

COVID-19 pandemic has triggered cognitive decline in over 50s - Diabetes.co.uk

COVID-19 often spreads after Thanksgiving. Get your vaccination now – Palm Beach Post

November 19, 2023

palmbeachpost.com wants to ensure the best experience for all of our readers, so we built our site to take advantage of the latest technology, making it faster and easier to use.

Unfortunately, your browser is not supported. Please download one of these browsers for the best experience on palmbeachpost.com

See the rest here:

COVID-19 often spreads after Thanksgiving. Get your vaccination now - Palm Beach Post

Can an Antiviral Reduce the Taste and Smell Disorder Associated … – Contagionlive.com

November 19, 2023

The loss of taste and smell has been one of the ongoing issues some people with COVID-19 encounter and they have varying degrees of persistence that can last a few weeks, and in some cases, up to several months.

As such, investigators wanted to study this phenomenon in patients using the COVID-19 oral antiviral, ensitrelvir, looking at the effects of oral ensitrelvir 125 mg and 250 mg on the resolution of taste and smell disorder in patients with COVID-19 with or without vaccination.

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that was part of the phase 3 SCORPIO-SR trial. According to the investigators, participants were between the ages 1270 years old, and given either ensitrelvir 125 mg PO (after 375 mg PO loading dose on Day 1 only), 250 mg PO (after 750 mg PO loading dose on Day 1 only) or placebo, once daily for 5 days, and were followed by Day 21 from start of treatment to analyze the proportion of patients presenting with taste or smell disorder.

The results were presented at the recent ID Week and demonstrated a benefit to reducing these comorbidities.

The proportions of patients with taste disorder or smell disorder were smaller in both the 125 mg and 250 mg groups compared with the placebo group on Day 5 to Day 9, the investigators wrote. Significantly smaller proportions of patients had taste disorder or smell disorder on Day 7 and Day 8 in the 125 mg ensitrelvir group, and on Day 8 and Day 9 in the 250 mg ensitrelvir group compared with the placebo group, respectively.

Ensitrelvir Overview and Regulatory Approval

Ensitrelvir is a selective SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor, and received emergency regulatory approval from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan for COVID-19 treatment in November 2022. Outside of Japan, ensitrelvir is an investigational therapy. In the United States, for example, the FDA granted the antiviral fast track status.

Yohei Doi, MD, professor of Medicine and director of the Center for Innovative Antimicrobial Therapy at the University of Pittsburgh and professor of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at Fujita Health University was one of the investigators in this study and spoke to Contagion about the agent and the phase 3 trial.

Reference

Tsuge Y, Doi Y,et al. Ensitrelvir for the Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: Evaluation of Taste Disorder and Smell Disorder in the Phase 3 Part of the Phase 2/3 SCORPIO-SR Randomized Controlled Trial. Poster #549 presented at IDWeek 2023. October 11-15, 2023. Boston, MA.

The rest is here:

Can an Antiviral Reduce the Taste and Smell Disorder Associated ... - Contagionlive.com

COVID-19 update 11-15-23 – Suffolk County Government (.gov)

November 19, 2023

Suffolk County reported the following information related to COVID-19 on November 14, 2023

According to CDC, hospital admission rates and the percentage of COVID-19 deaths among all deaths are now the primary surveillance metrics.

COVID-19 Hospitalizations for the week ending November 4, 2023

Daily Hospitalization Summary for Suffolk County From November 14, 2023

NOTE: HOSPITALS ARE NO LONGER REPORTING DATA TO NYSDOH ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS.

Fatalities 11/1423

COVID-19 Case Tracker November 12, 2023

Note: As of May 11, 2023, COVID-19 Community Levels (CCLs) and COVID-19 Community Transmission Levels are no longer calculatable, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* As of 4/4/22, HHS no longer requires entities conducting COVID testing to report negative or indeterminate antigen test results. This may impact the number and interpretation of total test results reported to the state and also impacts calculation of test percent positivity. Because of this, as of 4/5/22, test percent positivity is calculated using PCR tests only. Reporting of total new daily cases (positive results) and cases per 100k will continue to include PCR and antigen tests.

COVID-19 Vaccination Information

Last updated 5/12/23

Vaccination Clinics

As of September 12, 2023, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is not authorized to offer COVID-19 vaccines to ALL Suffolk County residents.

The department will offer the updated vaccine to only uninsured and underinsured patients through New York State's Vaccines for Children program and Vaccines for Adults program, also known as the Bridge Access Program.

Those with insurance that covers the COVID-19 vaccine are encouraged to receive their vaccines at their local pharmacies, health care providers offices, or local federally qualified health centers.

The department has ordered the updated COVID-19 vaccine and will announce when the vaccine becomes available.

FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

New York State Links

CDC COVID Data Tracker Rates of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations by vaccination status

For additional information or explanation of data, click on the links provided in throughout this page.

Go here to see the original:

COVID-19 update 11-15-23 - Suffolk County Government (.gov)

Saltwater gargling, nasal rinsing associated with lower COVID-19 … – Healio

November 19, 2023

November 17, 2023

2 min read

Add topic to email alerts

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

ANAHEIM, Calif. Saltwater gargling and nasal rinsing were associated with lower hospitalization rates among people infected with SARS-CoV-2, according to a poster presentation.

The study, which was presented at the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Annual Scientific Meeting, also found comparable results whether using low- or high-dose saline regimens.

Our goal was to examine saline nasal irrigation and gargling for possible association to improved respiratory symptoms associated with coronavirus infection, Jimmy Espinoza, MD, MSc, FACOG, professor at McGovern Medical School and co-author of the study, said in a press release. We found that both saline regimens appear to be associated with lower hospitalization rates compared to controls in SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Between 2020 to 2022, the Texas-based study recruited 58 adults infected with SARS-CoV-2, as documented through a positive PCR test, who were 14 days or less from symptom onset. Participants gargled saline solution and used it for nasal rinsing four times a day for 14 days. Their hospitalization rates, as well as symptom frequency and duration, were compared against a reference population of 9,398 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

Study participants were randomly assigned to either a low-saline regimen (n = 27; median age, 39 years; 63% women) of 2.13 grams of salt or a high-saline regimen (n = 28; median age, 41 years; 57.1% women) of 6 grams of salt. In both, the salt was dissolved in 8 ounces of warm water. Three saline regimen participants were lost to follow-up.

Hospitalization rates included 18.5% (n = 5) in the low-saline group and 21.4% (n = 6) in the high-saline group. Both were significantly lower than the reference populations hospitalization rate of 58.8% (P < .001).

With about three-quarters of both groups finishing 14 days of treatment, both regimens were associated with similar symptom frequency, with a median of seven symptoms reported in the low-saline group and five in the high-saline group, and duration (median, 7 days vs. 6 days). Also, there were no significant differences in rates of ICU admission between the low-saline regimen (7.4%), high-saline regimen (3.6%) or reference population (3.53%).

We conclude that low- and high-saline regimens for gargling and nasal rinsing are associated with similar clinical outcomes related with COVID-19 infection. Of note, both saline regimens appear to be associated with lower hospitalization rates compared to no gargling or nasal rinsing in individuals infected by COVID-19, Sebastian R. Espinoza, lead author of the study and student at Trinity University, said during his presentation. If confirmed, this simple intervention could be beneficial for individuals with COVID-19 infection, particularly in low resource settings.

Collapse

Espinoza SR, et al. Double blind randomized controlled trial of saline solution gargling and nasal rinsing in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Presented at: ACAAI Annual Scientific Meeting; Nov. 9-13; Anaheim, California.

Disclosures: Healio could not confirm relevant financial disclosures at the time of publication.

Add topic to email alerts

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

View post:

Saltwater gargling, nasal rinsing associated with lower COVID-19 ... - Healio

Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to … – Pew Research Center

November 19, 2023

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand how Americans view science, as well as their levels of confidence in groups and institutions in society. For this analysis, we surveyed 8,842 U.S. adults from Sept. 25 to Oct. 1, 2023.

Everyone who took part in the survey is a member of the Centers American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way, nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATPs methodology.

Here are the questions used for this report, along with responses, and its methodology.

A new Pew Research Center survey finds the share of Americans who say science has had a mostly positive effect on society has fallen and theres been a continued decline in public trust in scientists.

In this report, we cover:

Overall, 57% of Americans say science has had a mostly positive effect on society. This share is down 8 percentage points since November 2021 and down 16 points since before the start of the coronavirus outbreak.

About a third (34%) now say the impact of science on society has been equally positive as negative. A small share (8%) think science has had a mostly negative impact on society.

When it comes to the standing of scientists, 73% of U.S. adults have a great deal or fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the publics best interests. But trust in scientists is 14 points lower than it was at the early stages of the pandemic.

The share expressing the strongest level of trust in scientists saying they have a great deal of confidence in them has fallen from 39% in 2020 to 23% today.

As trust in scientists has fallen, distrust has grown: Roughly a quarter of Americans (27%) now say they have not too much or no confidence in scientists to act in the publics best interests, up from 12% in April 2020.

Ratings of medical scientists mirror the trend seen in ratings of scientists generally. Read Chapter 1 of the report for a detailed analysis of this data.

People with greater trust in scientists are more likely to align their own beliefs and actions with expert guidance and understanding.

For instance, those with high trust are more likely to have gotten vaccines for COVID-19 and the flu. They are also more likely to say human activity contributes to climate change.

In addition, scientific leaders are concerned that differences in levels of trust by things like party identification, race and ethnicity, and education could contribute to the benefits of science being spread unevenly across society.

The Center survey of 8,842 U.S. adults conducted Sept. 25-Oct. 1, 2023, finds that, despite recent declines in ratings, scientists and medical scientists continue to be held in high regard compared with other prominent groups in society. Smaller shares of Americans express confidence in business leaders, religious leaders, journalists and elected officials to act in the publics best interests. As with scientists, most of these groups have seen their ratings decline in recent years.

Americans have expressed low trust in federal government and other institutions, like Congress, for decades. And political polarization the widening gap between the views of Republicans and Democrats across a broad range of issues and attitudes has come to be a dominant feature of American political life.

Declining levels of trust in scientists and medical scientists have been particularly pronounced among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents over the past several years. In fact, nearly four-in-ten Republicans (38%) now say they have not too much or no confidence at all in scientists to act in the publics best interests. This share is up dramatically from the 14% of Republicans who held this view in April 2020. Much of this shift occurred during the first two years of the pandemic and has persisted in more recent surveys.

Confidence in scientists has also moved lower among Democrats. The share of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents with a great deal of confidence in scientists which initially rose in the pandemics first year now stands at 37%, down from a high of 55% in November 2020. But unlike Republicans, a large majority of Democrats (86%) continue to express at least a fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the publics best interests. The overall differences in partisan views remain much more pronounced today than they were prior to the coronavirus outbreak.

One of the starkest illustrations of polarization in views of science is the drop in the share of Republicans who view the societal impact of science positively.

Fewer than half of Republicans (47%) now say that science has had a mostly positive effect on society. In 2019, 70% of Republicans said that science has had a mostly positive effect.

A majority of Democrats (69%) continue to say science has had a mostly positive effect on society, though this share is 8 points lower than it was in 2019.

Republicans were largely critical of the countrys response to the coronavirus outbreak. For instance, large shares said too little priority was given to respecting individuals choices, supporting businesses and economic activity, and meeting the needs of K-12 students. In addition, many Republicans felt that public health officials personal views had too much influence on policy and that officials were too quick to dismiss views that challenged their scientific understanding.

Despite declines in ratings of scientists and science, a large majority of Americans continue to see government investments in science as worthwhile. And most place at least some importance on the United States being a world leader in scientific achievements.

About eight-in-ten Americans (78%) say government investments in scientific research are usually worthwhile for society. Far fewer (20%) think these investments are generally not worthwhile. Large majorities across demographic and education groups see government investments in scientific research as worthwhile, as do large majorities of both Democrats and Republicans.

In addition, 52% of Americans think it is very important for the U.S. to be a world leader in scientific achievements; an additional 37% think this is somewhat important. These shares are more or less unchanged since last year.

Originally posted here:

Americans' Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to ... - Pew Research Center

COVID exposure apps: Did they help curb spread? – WHYY

November 17, 2023

From Philly and the Pa. suburbs to South Jersey and Delaware, what would you like WHYY News to cover? Let us know!

In 2020, people wanted a way to tell if they might have been exposed to COVID-19.

More than 20 states in the U.S., including Pennsylvania and Delaware, used a smartphone app that applied existing bluetooth technology to keep track of how far away someone was from another person who had the app. It also sent out alerts if those people later reported themselves as having COVID-19. Each state had their own version of the app.

In the U.S. people were not required to use these apps, and few did, making them less effective than in other countries. But experts say public health authorities in the U.S. can still learn from the experience and be more prepared the next time a pandemic happens.

The Association of Public Health Laboratories managed the exposure notification program for states in the U.S. that used an app to warn people about exposure to COVID-19. Senior consultant Emma Sudduth said they were excited about this in the beginning.

Every time a friend or family in another state received an exposure notification, I was always told, and I was always very proud to hear that they had gotten a notification that they were delaying their trip to visit their grandma, that they were going to start testing, that they were monitoring.

She said the association estimates that around 10% of the entire U.S. population, millions of people, downloaded an exposure notification app. But this was not enough for these apps to be broadly effective.

We were building the plane while we were flying it, so to speak, Sudduth said.

Earlier this year, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention worked with Pennsylvania health officials to study how much of a difference the app made in Pennsylvania. They found that from the end of 2020 to the start of 2021, around 5% of the people they surveyed had downloaded the app. Of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 in their survey, only 0.2% of people had installed the app.The researchers concluded this limited how effective the app could have been.

Joanna Masel, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona, helped develop an app for her university, and the state of Arizona. She said it helped reduce transmission on campus by making a real but modest impact.

She added that exposure notification apps will probably be effective in the U.S. in places like that smaller, tightly connected communities like workplaces, colleges, and schools, where people can also be more consistently and quickly tested.

See the article here:

COVID exposure apps: Did they help curb spread? - WHYY

Should you get your Covid and flu shots at the same time? New research suggests yes – NBC News

November 17, 2023

Covid and flu shots can be safely given at the same time, and according to a small new study, doing so may even confer benefits.

Findings presented Monday at the Vaccines Summit Boston, an annual scientific conference, suggest that giving Covid and flu shots together could produce a stronger antibody response against the coronavirus than administering the vaccines separately.

The study measured the antibody levels of 42 health care workers in Massachusetts who were vaccinated last fall. Twelve of the participants received a bivalent Covid booster and seasonal influenza shot on the same day. Another 30 received the shots on different days within the span of a month.

Three to four weeks after people got their Covid boosters, those who had received the flu shot at the same time had higher levels of IgG1, an antibody involved in the body's front-line defense against Covid. The results held true six months later, suggesting that co-administering the vaccines could improve long-term protection.

We showed that the Covid antibody responses were higher and more durable if the Covid and flu vaccines were given on the same day, said Susanna Barouch, the studys lead author and an intern at the Ragon Institute's Systems Serology Lab in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The research is undergoing peer review and has not been published in a scientific journal. Ryan McNamara, the lab's director and senior author on the study, said the findings still need to be replicated in a larger group of volunteers, but he felt it was useful to share the results right away. In September, the findings were posted to the preprint server BioRxiv.

"We thought that these findings were very important for immediate public health decision making," McNamara said.

He expects the results to apply to this years updated Covid vaccines, he added, though his team plans to explore that further.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends getting Covid and flu vaccines at the same appointment if people are eligible for both shots at once. But that recommendation is based on convenience rather than efficacy, said Dr. Judith ODonnell, chief of infectious diseases at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center in Philadelphia, who wasnt part of the study.

We probably would want to see this kind of data replicated using the current 2023 vaccines to really know with 100% certainty how giving those together might enhance immunity or not, she said.

McNamara said it's still unclear why getting Covid and flu shots together might result in stronger, more lasting protection.

One theory, he said, is that most people's bodies are already primed to produce Covid antibodies because they've been vaccinated or exposed to the virus before. Giving two vaccines at once could awaken this immune response to a greater extent than one shot alone, which may lead to more a robust antibody response, he said.

"Your immune system is a highly tuned army and its basically calling all the special forces at the same time," said Dr. Michelle Barron, senior medical director of infection prevention and control at UCHealth in Colorado, who was not involved in the research.

But that strong immune response could also induce greater side effects, she added. In a 2022 study, getting a Covid booster and flu shot together was associated with an 8% to 11% higher rate of self-reported side effects like fatigue, headache and muscle pain in the week after vaccination compared to getting a Covid booster alone.

An October analysis from the Food and Drug Administration, which has not been peer-reviewed, also identified a slightly elevated risk of stroke among people ages 85 and up who had received a high-dose flu shot at the same time as a bivalent Covid vaccine.

Dr. Scott Roberts, an infectious disease specialist at Yale Medicine, said it's possible that "we're starting to see the immune system revved up so much that we're seeing these inflammatory conditions like stroke in this select age group."

But Barron noted that many older people have underlying health conditions that independently increase their risk of stroke, and several other studies have not identified the same safety concern with co-administering Covid and flu shots.

"The benefit of getting the shots and knowing that you have that protection will outweigh any of these potential risks," she said.

The CDC recommends getting a flu shot by the end of October. As of Monday, however, less than 33% of children and less than 35% of adults in the U.S. had gotten their flu shots, according to CDC data.

Uptake of Covid shots is even lower this year: 5% of children and 14% of adults have received the updated Covid vaccine.

ODonnell said its reasonable for people to want to space out their shots to lower the risk of side effects. While the CDC does not recommend a certain waiting period between vaccines, ODonnell suggested for people who prefer to space them out, separating the shots by a couple weeks.

But infectious disease experts widely agreed that co-administration may be the best option at this point, since the vaccines take two weeks to be fully effective and both Covid and flu are spreading in the U.S.

Covid hospital admissions fell 8% nationally the week ending Nov. 4, but theyre rising in many individual counties. Flu-related hospital admissions also rose 20% in that time, while the number of positive flu tests rose 50%.

"We've been seeing increases in Covid and now we're seeing increases in flu," Barron said. "Theres really no value in saying, Oh, Ill wait another week, because thats another week where, whichever vaccine you didnt get, youre now potentially vulnerable."

Aria Bendix is the breaking health reporter for NBC News Digital.

Here is the original post:

Should you get your Covid and flu shots at the same time? New research suggests yes - NBC News

Page 109«..1020..108109110111..120130..»