Category: Corona Virus Vaccine

Page 318«..1020..317318319320..330340..»

Coronavirus vaccine could be TWO YEARS away devastating global economy, ex-New Zealand PM warns – The Sun

July 12, 2020

A CORONAVIRUS vaccine could be more than two years away in a blow that could cripple the global economy, former New Zealand leader Helen Clark has warned.

Her warning comes as she has been named to co-chair a panel to review the World Health Organisation's (WHO) handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates

3

3

The former Prime Minister called for a dramatic increase in global action to save countries from collapse should the coronavirus pandemic get worse.

The findings from her introspective investigation could take more than a year to publish, but Ms Clark is hopeful it will help mankind learn lessons from global outbreak.

However, she warned the virus threat is likely to last for several years as a vaccine is still a long way off - potentially not arriving until late 2022.

Most scientists believe developing the inoculation is the only safe way life can return to how it was before the pandemic.

She said: "I'm told from Geneva that the most optimistic scenario for a widely available vaccine would be at least two and a half years.

"And even then we dont know how efficacious it would be it may not stop us getting it, it may simply mitigate the impact of getting it.

"In the end, a disease like this, like a plague of ancient times, will keep going as long as hosts present themselves for it, so we have to cut the transmission cycle."

The warning counters some of the optimistic claims for the development of the first vaccines to counter Covid-19.

The Milken Institute is tracking at least 180 vaccine projects around the world - with British scientists hoping for a breakthrough by September.

Ms Clark - who led New Zealand from 1999 to 2008 - will be working alongside former Liberian president Ellen Johnson Sirleaf to lead a WHO panel investigating its own handling of the Covid-19 crisis.

She called on the world's nations to step up to help tackle the looming economic fallout of the pandemic.

The former world leader said the world faces a "$2.5trillion crisis".

She warned some nations would"go over a cliff"with dire effects on their neighbours unless the G20 develops a joint response.

She said: "No-one has stepped up from the G20 to say 'we have to act' even when it is not in anybody's interest to have one economy after another fall over."

Ms Clark added: "I think it can get worse if the G20 doesn't mobilise the support required for the international financial institutions to do their job."

Britain is already feeling the pinch from the pandemic, with Chancellor Rishi Sunak confirming the economy has shrunk by 25 per cent in just two months.

3

It come as the US formally notified WHO on Tuesday that it will be withdrawing from the UN body in 2021.

WHO has come under heavy criticism over the pandemic, with US President Donald Trump's alleging it was too "China-centric".

Ms Clark said: "I feel in a sense that the coordination was left to rest on the WHOs shoulders when it had spun out into a crisis that was far greater than the WHO could cope with."

She described the task ahead as "exceptionally challenging" - with the virus having infected more than 12million people worldwide and killed almost 550,000.

Latest

DOUBLE TRAGEDYPregnant YouTube star Nicole Thea dies aged 24 along with unborn son

Latest

FARM OUTBREAK73 workers catch corona at veg farm that supplies Tesco & Aldi as 200 isolate

'JUST AN ACCIDENT'Naya's lake disappearance NOT suicide cops say after chat with son, 4

HIGH ALERTSpanish city of 140,000 people locks down again after spike in coronavirus cases

RAPE HELLWoman raped near Morrisons after being followed for 15 mins in horrifying attack

'TURNED HIS BACK'Harry blasted as 'complete idiot' by Army hero over Commonwealth comments

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said announced the inquiry at a virtual meeting with representatives of WHO's 195 member states.

He said: "The magnitude of this pandemic, which has touched virtually everyone in the world, clearly deserves a commensurate evaluation, an honest evaluation.

"This is not a standard report that ticks a box and is then put on a shelf to gather dust. This is something we take seriously."

The panel will produce its first findings in November before presenting a "substantive report" in May.

Go here to see the original:

Coronavirus vaccine could be TWO YEARS away devastating global economy, ex-New Zealand PM warns - The Sun

An injection may block COVID-19, but feds have failed to act – Los Angeles Times

July 11, 2020

It might be the next best thing to a coronavirus vaccine.

Scientists have devised a way to use the antibody-rich blood plasma of COVID-19 survivors for an upper-arm injection that they say could inoculate people against the virus for months.

Using technology thats been proven effective in preventing other diseases such as hepatitis A, the injections would be administered to high-risk healthcare workers, nursing home patients, or even at public drive-through sites potentially protecting millions of lives, the doctors and other experts say.

The two scientists who spearheaded the proposal an 83-year-old shingles researcher and his counterpart, an HIV gene therapy expert have garnered widespread support from leading blood and immunology specialists, including those at the center of the nations COVID-19 plasma research.

But the idea exists only on paper. Federal officials have twice rejected requests to discuss the proposal, and pharmaceutical companies even acknowledging the likely efficacy of the plan have declined to design or manufacture the shots, according to a Times investigation. The lack of interest in launching development of immunity shots comes amid heightened scrutiny of the federal governments sluggish pandemic response.

There is little disagreement that the idea holds promise; the dispute is over the timing. Federal health officials and industry groups say the development of plasma-based therapies should focus on treating people who are already sick, not on preventing infections in those who are still healthy.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, said an upper-arm injection that would function like a vaccine is a very attractive concept.

However, he said, scientists should first demonstrate that the coronavirus antibodies that are currently delivered to patients intravenously in hospital wards across the country actually work. Once you show the efficacy, then the obvious next step is to convert it into an intramuscular shot.

But scientists who question the delay argue that the immunity shots are easy to scale up and should enter clinical trials immediately. They say that until theres a vaccine, the shots offer the only plausible method for preventing potentially millions of infections at a critical moment in the pandemic.

Beyond being a lost opportunity, this is a real head-scratcher, said Dr. Michael Joyner, a Mayo Clinic researcher who leads a program sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration to capitalize on coronavirus antibodies from COVID-19 survivors. It seems obvious.

The use of so-called convalescent plasma has already become widespread. More than 28,000 patients have already received the IV treatment, and preliminary data suggest that the method is safe. Researchers are also looking at whether the IV drip products would prevent new infections from taking root.

The antibodies in plasma can be concentrated and delivered to patients through a type of drug called immune globulin, or IG, which can be given through either an IV drip or a shot. IG shots have for decades been used to prevent an array of diseases; the IG shot that prevents hepatitis A was first licensed in 1944. They are available to treat patients who have recently been exposed to hepatitis B, tetanus, varicella and rabies.

Yet for the coronavirus, manufacturers are only developing an intravenous solution of IG.

Joyner told The Times that 600 COVID-19 survivors donating their plasma each day could, depending on donation volumes and concentrations, generate up to 5,000 IG shots. With millions of probable survivors in the United States, he said, capacity isnt a problem.

Plasma companies said theyve focused their efforts on an intervention for the sickest patients. Grifols, for example, said it has not developed a shot because it is pursuing a federally supported IV formula to treat patients already infected with a serious case of COVID-19, but the company acknowledged that an antibody injection would be a good choice for prevention.

Advocates for the immunity shots say businesses are reluctant to invest in a product that could soon be replaced by a vaccine, so the government should offer financial incentives to offset that risk. Billions of federal dollars are already being spent on vaccine research through Operation Warp Speed, and funding for an IG shot that could serve as a bridge to a vaccine would come with a relatively modest price tag, they say.

Antibodies are the most precious resource on the planet right now, next to air. We have the industry, the technology, and the know-how to produce a proven product, said Patrick Schmidt, the chief executive of FFF Enterprises, a major distributor of IG products in the United States.

The amount of money and resources going into a vaccine, with no guarantee it will work this could have saved lives by now.

::

The proposal for an injection approach to coronavirus prevention came from an immunization researcher who drew his inspiration from history.

Dr. Michael Oxman knew that, even during the 1918 flu pandemic, the blood of recovered patients appeared to help treat others. Since then, convalescent plasma has been used to fight measles and severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, among other diseases.

Like other doctors, Oxman surmised that, for a limited time, the blood coursing through the veins of coronavirus survivors probably contains immune-rich antibodies that could prevent or help treat an infection.

On March 27, he and Dr. John Zaia, the director of City of Hopes Center for Gene Therapy, submitted a proposal to the federal Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, urging the rollout of IG shots for first responders and members of other high-risk groups.

The agency granted $12.5 million to Grifols and $14.5 million to Emergent BioSolutions to produce plasma-based COVID-19 medicines in IV form drips, among more than 50 different biomedical partnerships to fight the pandemic. But the immunity shot proposal was rejected.

The pair followed up with a detailed proposal to conduct a clinical trial at UC San Diego. They believed injectable 5-milliliter vials of IG could be given quickly by minimally trained healthcare workers, offering at least two months of immunity to doctors and nurses, as well as residents of nursing homes, college dormitories and military submarines.

The submission was backed by four other infectious disease researchers and statisticians, but it was also rejected, records show.

A spokeswoman for BARDA told The Times that the agency had received thousands of submissions, and that while we are interested in the potential of [IG] for treatment and prevention, we are focused intently on treatments for hospitalized patients to save lives.

The strategy baffled Oxman and Zaia, who said the IG shots are a far more efficient delivery system that can potentially reach many more people.

Whats more, prophylactic shots would probably require far fewer antibodies than IV treatments, Joyner said. With IG shots, plasma donations could possibly go twice or even five times as far, he said.

If a second wave of the virus were to arrive before an effective vaccine, that stockpile would be all the more essential.

Oxman started focusing his attention on the key players in the industry the manufacturers who dominate the development of plasma drugs. He held weekly phone calls with Schmidt, the distributor; together, the two tried to persuade seven companies to produce the shots themselves and bring them to health agencies for testing. They were unsuccessful.

Takeda and CSL Behring, two large companies who co-lead the new CoVIg-19 Plasma Alliance to develop an IG product for IV drips, said their efforts are trained on the sickest. The IV formula represents the fastest path to reach patients, assuming the trial is successful, said Julie Kim, the head of the plasma-derived therapies business unit at Takeda.

Financial calculations may be another factor for companies. Intravenous plasma products are traditionally the main economic driver for the industry, supply experts said, in part because vaccines have replaced many short-term immunity shots over the years. The money-making antibodies are also far more diluted in intravenous drugs than in injectable ones, which boosts profit margins.

They charge a fortune off of intravenous drugs in the hospital. They dont want to devote the manufacturing plant to something that wont make oodles of money, said one infectious disease expert, who has advocated for coronavirus IG shots but asked not to be publicly identified.

Researchers also said industry executives have little incentive to produce the immunity shots for the coronavirus, given the possibility that a longer-lasting vaccine could replace it within a year.

Representatives for CSL, Takeda and Grifols all challenged that assertion.

The choice of one delivery method or another has no connection with the potential financial or pricing implications, a Grifols spokesman told The Times.

Throughout May, researchers and doctors at Yale, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Duke and four University of California schools sent a barrage of letters to dozens of lawmakers. They held virtual meetings with health policy directors on Capitol Hill, but say they have heard no follow-up to date.

Dr. Arturo Casadevall, the chair of the National COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Project, said he spoke to FDA officials who told him they do not instruct companies on what to produce. Casadevall told The Times that the leaders of the national project were very supportive of the need to develop an IG shot rapidly and that he believed it would be very helpful in stemming the epidemic.

Joyner, of the Mayo Clinic, said there are probably 10 million to 20 million people in the U.S. carrying coronavirus antibodies and the number keeps climbing. If just 2% of them were to donate a standard 800 milliliters of plasma on three separate occasions, their plasma alone could generate millions of IG shots for high-risk Americans.

At a hot-spot meatpacking plant, or at a mobile unit in the parking lot outside a mall trust me, you can get the plasma, Joyner said. This is not a biological problem nor a technology problem. Its a back-of-the-envelope intelligence problem.

The antibody injections, for now, do not appear to be a high priority for the government or the industry.

Grifols, on April 28 the same day that the U.S. topped 1 million confirmed coronavirus cases made a major product announcement that would expand its leadership in disease treatment with immunoglobulins.

The product was a new vial for IG shots to treat rabies.

Follow this link:

An injection may block COVID-19, but feds have failed to act - Los Angeles Times

Coronavirus Vaccine Approval Might Be Sought This Year, According To CEO – OrthoSpineNews

July 11, 2020

July 10, 2020 / Karen Robinson-Jacobs, Forbes Staff

A German biotech firm working with New York-based pharma giant Pfizer Inc. to develop a coronavirus vaccine claims its confident it will be ready to seek regulatory approval for widespread distribution of its drug by the end of the year, its chief executive told theWall Street Journal, making what scientists had seen as an optimistic goal appear achievable.

READ THE REST HERE

Read more here:

Coronavirus Vaccine Approval Might Be Sought This Year, According To CEO - OrthoSpineNews

New COVID-19 symptoms reported in young adults as El Paso County doctors urge them to stop the spread – KRDO

July 11, 2020

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (KRDO) -- According to WKRN in Nashville, Tennessee, statistics in multiple states show an increase in COVID-19 cases predominantly from people in their 20s and 30s, and now doctors say they are also seeing different symptoms among their younger patients.

Over the past few days, theyre starting to develop, theyre describing some new symptoms, explained Dr. Alex Jahangir with Metro Nashvilles Coronavirus Task Force.

While fever was originally the first telltale sign of the novel coronavirus, now many dont ever get one, as cited by WKRN.

The spectrum of symptoms continues to expand and so younger people often do come in now somewhat to our surprise without fever, and this abdominal pain seems to affect them a little bit more, said Dr. William Schaffner, an Infectious Disease professor at Vanderbilt University.

Other symptoms include nausea, diarrhea, loss of taste and smell, and severe headaches.

Associate Chief Medical Officer at UCHealth Memorial, David Steinbruner, says, "I suspect that we're going to see a rise in a week or two, maybe two weeks, as the people who started to spread it inadvertently who are young and don't realize they have it, spread it to the older, more vulnerable population."

According to COVID-19 case data in Colorado, young adults ages 20-39, make up 36.52% of people who are infected with COVID-19. People aged 70+, only make up 12.93% of cases, however, due to their age, the older population sees a major disparity in deaths.

That 20-39 age group has only 22 reported deaths, while the 70+ age group spikes to 1,307. Doctors are urging young adults to be vigilant, and help stop the spread to older, more vulnerable populations.

If you live in Colorado Springs and need to get tested, there is a drive-through testing site at UCHealth Laboratory - Printers Park, Kids Care Point, 2050, Colorado Springs, CO 80909.

Original post:

New COVID-19 symptoms reported in young adults as El Paso County doctors urge them to stop the spread - KRDO

A key piece of the coronavirus vaccine is made in Mandeville – WWLTV.com

July 11, 2020

Creating pure, uncontaminated water isn't as easy as turning on a tap.

MANDEVILLE, La. Its the most abundant resource on Earth, and at MECO, a water purification company born in New Orleans more than 90 years ago, now based in Mandeville, water is what keeps business flowing. Its also a crucial part in developing a vaccine for coronavirus. Thats something company president George Gsell says MECO is working to help with.

Water is the critical utility in the manufacture of drugs and biologics, Gsell said. COVID-19s rise has put a tremendous demand obviously on these biopharmaceutical companies in a race for the cure.

Part of what the company does is manufacture the equipment needed to make sure water is nothing but water.

Many of us think of tap water off the wall, but water to these standards has to be actually manufactured and the manufacturing requirements are significant, Gsell said.

Through various and sometimes complex techniques, any contaminates must be removed.

Thats the key is to make sure theres absolutely nothing in it, nothing can grow in it and thats its pure water, Gsell said.

Equipment from MECO and the water that comes from it are used by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies around the world. The same goes for some laboratories currently testing for coronavirus.

Water is critical, said Dr. Jim Diaz, professor of public health and preventive medicine at LSU Health.

While not a vaccinologist and no connection to MECO, Dr. Diaz knows the importance of pure water across the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

Over time there have been some terrible tragedies from some things that have been mixed into drugs that havent been pure. They may have been contaminated with bacteria or fungi or they may have been contaminated by chemicals, Diaz said.

When it comes to water, thats what Gsells company is trying to prevent, especially in the fight against coronavirus.

We know that the vaccine is coming and so were really pleased to be a part of that, Gsell said.

Get breaking news from your neighborhood delivered directly to you by downloading the new FREE WWL-TV News app now in theIOS App StoreorGoogle Play.

Read more:

A key piece of the coronavirus vaccine is made in Mandeville - WWLTV.com

Could a coronavirus vaccine rehab the pharmaceutical industry’s reputation despite drug price increases? – USA TODAY

July 9, 2020

Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health said Thursday that "we are all optimistic" that the Trump administration's vaccine-acceleration program will produce a safe and effective vaccine for COVID-19 by year end. (July 2) AP Domestic

For years, the pharmaceutical industry has faced withering bipartisan criticism and a deteriorating reputation among the publicfor its role in driving up drug prices.

But the sector suddenly might be poised to go from villain to hero with the development of a vaccine that could end the COVID-19 pandemic.

The drug industry's reputation started this crisis in the basement afterhavingplunged toan all-time low in 2019, making it the least popular sector among 25 major industries, according to pollster Gallup.

Americans soured on the industry after net drug priceswhich factor in rebates and discounts increased by 60% from 2007 to 2018, about triple the rate of inflation, according to a University of Pittsburgh study. High-profile examples of sharp drug price hikes in recent years have included "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli's 5,000% increase of a life-saving treatment Daraprim and Mylan's about six-fold increase of the EpiPen, an emergency allergic reaction treatment.

While drugmakers throughout the world are chasing a coronavirus vaccine and only a few, at most, can win, the feverish pursuitrepresents one of the greatest opportunities in the history of medicinewith the reputational benefits alone worth the effort, not to mention the financial possibilities. The companies pursuing a vaccine include giants like Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

Drug companies have "spared no expense to kind of pivot and shift" to tackle the coronavirus, Gilead Sciences CEO Daniel O'Day told investors on a conference call April 30. "I think this will certainly help the industry's reputation."

Hundreds of pharmaceutical companies are pursuing a vaccine for COVID-19.(Photo: Getty Images)

Yet there are also potholes on the road to a vaccine for the drug industry, as Americans and industry critics express concern that the race could help pharma companies justify price increases and avoid a regulatory crackdown.

With drug prices where theyre at, people cant afford them and they are dying, saidTim Lash, chief strategy officer of West Health, a nonprofit that pursues lower health care costs. He added thatthere is very real concern about pharma leveraging the coronavirus vaccine push to increase the price of other treatments.

The chance to developa vaccine or a successful treatmentthat could save millions of lives and jobshas attracted hundreds of playersdespite the high likelihood of failure for most of them.

Vaccines which save about 2.5 million lives annually from conditions such as polio, measles and diphtheriarepresent "one of the most successful and cost-effective health interventions" ever, according to the World Health Organization.

Potential COVID-19treatments under development include150 vaccine candidates, 160 novel medications designed to kill the virus and 300 existing drugs that could be repurposed to treat it, according to the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), a trade group that represents biotech companies.

What experts say: We're one-third of the way to a widely available coronavirus vaccine

The race for a vaccine: FDA says a coronavirus vaccine would have to be at least 50% effective to be approved

Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. government'sNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, recently predicted that a vaccine could arrive by the end of 2020 or early 2021.

Pharma industry executives say the vaccine push shows how the industry is committed to using profits, which havebeen the target of much criticism, to support their pursuit of life-saving medications. About 90% of drug candidates fail,illustrating the need for substantial investments in potential therapies,saidStephen Ubl, CEO of industry trade group PhRMA, which represents pharmaceutical companies on policy issues in Washington,

"The coronavirus gives us the opportunity to tell the real story of the importance of the industry and why a robust biopharmaceutical sector is absolutely critical to the public health," Ubl said.

The pandemic has driven the public eye onto what the biotech industry does, which is change the dynamic of a disease, said Jeremy Levin, chairman of BIO and author of the recently published book Biotechnology in the Time of COVID-19: Commentaries from the Front Line.

But industry critics say pharmaceutical companies shouldn't be let off the hook for their role in driving up drug prices.

"There are certainly bright spots in the pharma sector in terms of innovation, hope and optimism and certainly those three things would apply to the work thats happening around COVID-19," Lash said. "But if you look at the performance of Big Pharma and their behavior over the last decade, it paints a very dark picture of drug pricing in America."

A study conducted byWest Health and polling outfit Gallup found that in a given 12-month period, about 1 in 5 American adults are unable to pay at least once for needed prescribed drugs.

And nearly 9 in 10 Americans are concerned that pharmaceutical companies will raise drug prices to compensate for the coronavirus vaccine race, according to another study by West Health and Gallup.

"The pharmaceutical sector has historically leveragedprice increases to further maximize profit," Lash said.

Pharmaceutical executives say their pricing is justified due to the high cost of research and developmentthat is now contributing to the pursuit of a vaccine for the coronavirus.

In this March 2020 photo provided by Gilead Sciences, a vial of the investigational drug remdesivir is visually inspected at a Gilead manufacturing site in the United States. Given through an IV, the medication is designed to interfere with an enzyme that reproduces viral genetic material.(Photo: AP)

For example, Gilead Sciences recently won approval to distribute its remdesivir drug as a treatment for critically ill COVID-19 patients. That antiviral drug, which Gilead said it spent more than $1 billion to develop,originally came about during thepursuit of a remedy for Ebola several years ago but went nowhere at the time. Gilead on June 29announced a pricing plan: $3,120 per treatment course for the typical insured patient.

It's currently unclear how a potential vaccine would be priced or whether it would be covered by insurance or by the government. The federal government's Operation Warp Speed is providing nearly $10 billion in funds to aid in the development and production of various coronavirus vaccines with a goal of delivering 300 million dosesby January 2021.

The average private-sector non-influenza vaccine for adults ranges from about $26for Grifols' tetanus and diphtheria toxoids inoculation to $228for Merck's Human papillomavirus inoculation, according to the CDC.

Ubl said Americans don't need to be concerned about the price of a COVID-19 vaccine. "The industry is deeply committed to, when we find safe and effective therapies, we want them to be safe and accessible," he said.

He attributed much of the criticism over drug prices to "relatively few bad actors" responsible for sharp increases, including Shkreli, who was later imprisoned after being convicted on unrelated fraud charges, and Mylan.

In the noise that came from the bad actors, we basically lost sight of the essence of what the biotech is all about, which is patients and innovation, Levin said

With the public's attention suddenly focused on the push for a vaccine, the pharmaceutical industry senses an opportunity to ease regulatorypressure in Washington, too.

The pressure has come in the rare form of abipartisan chorus, ranging as widely as President Donald Trump to one of his fiercest critics, Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont), both of whomhave repeatedly called for policies to restrict drug prices.

Bernie Sanders.(Photo: Timothy A. Clary/Getty Images)

Some say thefederal government's Medicare program should be allowed to negotiate drug prices instead of paying market value, a move that advocates say would help lower prices across the board. Others say the government should impose caps on drug prices, among other possibilities.

Ubl criticized the push for "draconian policies that would upend the business model" and "throw sand into the gears" of innovation. But he said he's hopeful that policymakers will recognize that the race to solve the coronavirus pandemic "highlights the benefit of our free market system."

PhRMA has led a marketing and publicity campaign in recent months to promote the industry's role in developing a vaccine or treatment. The group has advertised in news outlet Politico's influential "Playbook" e-newsletter, run a print advertisement along with BIO, published blog posts, compiledfact sheets andwritten reports documenting the industry's commitment to developing a safe and effective vaccine expeditiously.

Gilead CEO O'Day said in the April 30 call that he had already noticed a shift in rhetoric about drug pricing on Capitol Hill following the emergence of the pandemic.

"I think people are very appreciative and concerned about finding solutions here. And it's brought us all together, which I think is a good thing," he said. "I'm not suggesting that there won't continue to be focus and pressure on drug pricing. Of course, there will be. ... But it's being done now in a way where we can have an appreciation for the innovation the industry brings."

Lash said policymakers should not fall for the suggestion that pharmaceutical companies have taken an altruistic turn.

The pharmaceutical industry cant escape the fact that its the most profitable sector in our economy when you look at return on investment capital, he said.

For their part, Americans have placed significant blame on pharmaceutical companies for drug prices.

Only 21% of Americans gave the pharmaceutical sector positive ratings in a 2019 Gallup survey, while 58% gave it negative ratings. The industry'sreputation was even worse than the federal government's.

Its hard to do worse than the government in these types of positivity, negativity ratings, said Dan Witters, research director of theGallupNational Health and Well-Being Index. Theres real public sentiment here against pharmaceutical companies.

Witters conceded that the COVID-19 vaccine race could lend some buoyancy to the industrys reputation.

But in the long run, Americans are unlikely to forgive the industry for drug prices, he said.

In my opinion, whatever goodwill may ultimately be bought for the pharmaceutical industry as a function for its efforts to come up with a vaccine, I think its going to be fleeting, Witters said. The concern about rising costs generally is overwhelming.

Follow USA TODAY reporter Nathan Bomey on Twitter @NathanBomey.

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/07/08/coronavirus-vaccine-covid-19-pharmaceutical-industry/5354630002/

View post:

Could a coronavirus vaccine rehab the pharmaceutical industry's reputation despite drug price increases? - USA TODAY

U.S. Weighs Early Vaccine Access for Minorities and Others at Risk – The New York Times

July 9, 2020

Its racial inequality inequality in housing, inequality in employment, inequality in access to health care that produced the underlying diseases, Dr. Matthew said in an interview. Thats wrong. And its that inequality that requires us to prioritize by race and ethnicity.

Harald Schmidt, an assistant professor of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, is not a member of the committee, but has been suggesting other ways vaccine prioritization could work. He predicts that courts would strike down any guidelines explicitly based on race and ethnicity. Instead, he has proposed using an index that takes into account education, income, employment and housing quality to rank neighborhoods by socioeconomic disadvantage that he says could serve as a good proxy.

Its imperative that we pay attention to how Covid has impacted the health of minorities differently; otherwise it compounds the inequalities weve seen, Dr. Schmidt said.

There may be substantial differences in how racial and ethnic groups view vaccines. A recent Pew survey found that a little over half of Black adults said they would definitely or probably get a coronavirus vaccine if one were available today, while 44 percent said they would not. Among Hispanic and white adults, 74 percent said they would get the vaccine, while around a quarter said they would not.

Because of Tuskegee and structural racism within the health care system, you have to make a case much more strongly to the African-American population, Dr. Schmidt said.

Whoever is prioritized for the first doses, it will not matter if the vaccines dont work for those demographics. And that will not be determined unless the vaccine trials themselves include those groups. So far, several vaccine candidates have entered final Phase 3 trials.

At a Senate hearing last week, Dr. Robert R. Redfield, the C.D.C. director, and Dr. Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes for Health, emphasized the need for racial and other diversity within the trials.

Originally posted here:

U.S. Weighs Early Vaccine Access for Minorities and Others at Risk - The New York Times

How a coronavirus vaccine will get to market – PBS NewsHour

July 9, 2020

With new daily case counts of novel coronavirus on the rise in nearly every state, as well as Puerto Rico, the consequences of reopening much of the country without first stopping the spread has made one thing clear: An unlocked United States will likely continue to suffer from the deadly virus until a safe and efficient vaccine is finally distributed to a majority of the population.

There are lots of different ways to formulate a vaccine, and all of them are now being considered for coronavirus. Some vaccines use common methods to confer immunity, while others are entirely experimental theyve never before been approved for use.

No matter the approach, academic, corporate and government research teams around the globe are coordinating with national and international agencies to move their candidates through preclinical animal trials and, for those with promising results, human trials. All of them aim to one day see millions, even billions, of doses of their vaccine manufactured and distributed to those in need hopefully, sooner rather than later.

But leading public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci have warned there is simply no guarantee that the ongoing national research effort will produce a successful vaccine in 12 to 18 months a timetable hes repeatedly laid out.

Dr. Anthony Fauci has warned there is no guarantee that the ongoing national research effort will produce a successful vaccine in 12 to 18 months.

In testimony last week, Fauci, one of the leading members of the White Houses coronavirus task force, emphasized the unpredictable nature of vaccine development, while adding that hes hopeful that a number of doses will be approved and available for distribution by the beginning of 2021.

We are cautiously optimistic, looking at animal data and the early preliminary data, that we will at least know the extent of efficacy [for vaccines that go through clinical trials] sometime in the winter and early part of next year, he said before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Vaccines normally go through around a decade of research and evaluation before finally being approved for commercial use. But public health officials have determined that the urgency of the pandemic demands a significantly expedited version of that process.

With any potential vaccine, researchers have to ask a series of questions: Does it successfully prompt a desired immune response in humans? Has it been shown to be both safe and effective? Can manufacturing be scaled up to meet the demand required by this crisis?

More dilemmas are likely to arise once a vaccine has been approved for use, one of the most crucial being which groups will be first to receive it, and how that decision will be made.

Heres a look at some of the top vaccine contenders, as well as the challenges public health officials will face when that vaccine is finally ready for use.

One of our immune systems main attributes is that it can remember what viruses look like so that our cells know how to fight them off if they infect us again. When weve been vaccinated against a pathogen or exposed to it naturally, we usually suffer less severe symptoms, or none at all.

In the case of coronavirus, which is believed to have just recently evolved to infect humans, its not yet clear if, or for how long, a person who has survived COVID-19 is protected against reinfection. More conclusive antibody research is needed to determine whether those who have already had the virus will need a vaccine, or if those who do get the vaccine will eventually need booster shots as maintenance.

Megan McGrew/PBS NewsHour

Under normal circumstances, candidate vaccines first go through preclinical trials in which animals like mice or monkeys are inoculated. Researchers then evaluate whether their bodies produced an immune response that would potentially protect against infection in humans, and look for any adverse side effects.

After that, successful candidates are eligible to be tested in humans. During the first phase of clinical trials, researchers give the vaccine to a small number of healthy adults to check for safety and immunogenicity, or the vaccines ability to prompt its desired immune response. The second phase of this effort, which involves several hundred volunteers, looks for any unwanted side effects and determines what dose produces the most effective immune response.

The third and final phase of vaccine testing continues to evaluate safety and effectiveness by inoculating thousands, even tens of thousands, of volunteers and determines how well the vaccine prevents infection while noting any rare side effects associated with it that didnt become apparent during earlier phases.

If all of these steps are successfully completed, researchers can submit their data for review by the Food and Drug Administrations Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. That division is responsible for approving vaccines, overseeing their production and continuing to monitor them once theyre on the market. Only about 6 percent of candidate vaccines are ever approved for commercial use.

Only about 6 percent of candidate vaccines are ever approved for commercial use.

To identify a promising vaccine for coronavirus, researchers are instead evaluating all of these factors safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, side effects in parallel through trials that combine the phases of a typical vaccine development process.

During last weeks hearing, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn emphasized the importance of including racial minorities, the elderly, pregnant women and those with other health conditions in large scale human trials to ensure that any vaccine moving through the approval process will be effective on populations most vulnerable to COVID-19. Pregnant people and the elderly or immunocompromised typically arent involved in trials like this, but have been identified as being at greater risk for severe virus outcomes, so researchers must ensure these vaccines protect them.

The Defense Department, one of the agencies partnering on the Trump administrations national vaccine development initiative, has said that officials expect to be producing large quantities of vaccines while the clinical trials are still underway, so that there is no delay in manufacturing once safety and efficacy have been demonstrated.

Operation Warp Speed is aiming to deliver 300 million doses of a safe, effective vaccine by January 2021, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. In order to do that, billions of federal dollars are being allocated to scale up manufacturing of a handful of promising candidates before theyre actually authorized for distribution. Its a financial risk that most private companies would be loath to take, but a necessary gamble for the government in the context of the pandemic.

Among the 21 global candidate vaccines currently moving through clinical trials, Operation Warp Speed has begun to single out a handful of contenders by offering them funding, including AstraZeneca, Moderna and Novavax and Johnson & Johnson. The criteria for how those companies were chosen is not fully clear, a concern that lawmakers have pointed out and pushed Trump administration officials for answers. Heres what we do know:

AstraZeneca: The vaccine, developed by researchers at the University of Oxford, is a modified adenovirus that mimics the new coronavirus spike proteins, which are what allows the virus to invade human cells. When introduced to the human body, the vaccine aims to prompt the creation of antibodies that would neutralize the actual coronavirus and prevent it from entering an infected persons cells. Phase 3 trials recently kicked off in Britain, Brazil and South Africa.

WATCH: Meet people volunteering to be exposed to COVID-19 for vaccine research

Last month, AstraZeneca announced that it had reached an agreement with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Gavi The Vaccine Alliance to support the manufacturing, procurement and distribution of 300 million doses of its vaccine, and that delivery would start by the end of this year. The company also said that it would partner with the Serum Institute of India to supply one billion doses for low and middle-income countries, with a commitment to provide 400 million before the end of 2020.

Moderna: This candidate vaccine injects messenger RNA into the body that cells then translate into antigens resembling the coronavirus spike proteins, which intend to prompt the creation of antibodies that would neutralize the new coronavirus if a vaccinated person were to be infected.

Vaccines that use messenger RNA to provide immunity have never been approved for human use, but several are being tested to protect against COVID-19. If Modernas makes it to the finish line, itll be the first of its class to do so. A phase 3 study involving 30,000 volunteers is set to begin this month, and Moderna has partnered with the Swiss pharmaceutical company Lonza to manufacture approximately 500 million, but potentially up to 1 billion, doses per year.

Part of the appeal of Modernas vaccine is that messenger RNA is easy to make and not very stable it disintegrates quickly in the body, which means its fairly safe. But that quality could also make an mRNA vaccine difficult to distribute widely. mRNA needs to be stored at around negative 80 degrees Centigrade a much lower temperature than most other vaccines which infectious disease expert Paul Offit pointed out would be difficult to accommodate in many settings.

Novavax: The biotechnology company announced this week that Operation Warp Speed had pledged $1.6 billion to support late-stage clinical testing of the companys candidate vaccine, which is currently moving through a combined Phase 1/2 clinical trial. Novavax expects to see preliminary results regarding the vaccines safety and immunogenicity by the end of the month.

According to Novavax, its vaccine combines recombinant nanoparticle technology to create an antigen derived from the coronavirus spike protein with an adjuvant, or a compound that enhances the bodys immune response.

Johnson & Johnson: Johnson & Johnsons candidate vaccine combines genetic material from the coronavirus with a modified adenovirus in order to prompt a protective immune response, according to CNBC News.

In June, Johnson & Johnson announced that it expects a combined Phase 1/2a clinical trial of its vaccine involving over 1,000 healthy adults to begin in the U.S. and Belgium later this month. The company said that the trial will evaluate safety, immunogenicity and reactogenicity, or response to vaccination, and that its currently in discussions with the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to start a Phase 3 trial, pending the outcome of Phase 1 studies and the approval of regulators.

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, chief scientist at the World Health Organization, recently identified AstraZenecas vaccine as the leading candidate of the vaccines currently undergoing clinical evaluation. She added that Modernas vaccine is not too far behind, and that at least four Chinese companies are preparing to kick off large scale Phase 3 trials for their candidates one of which was recently approved for military use in China.

While those two candidates appear to be among the top contenders, a lot could change between now and the end of this year, let alone by the end of 2021, in the search for a viable coronavirus vaccine.

Experts also warn that the first vaccines may not be effective in completely preventing COVID-19 infection.

The chair of the United Kingdoms vaccine taskforce, Kate Bingham, has said she expects that the first coronavirus vaccines to prove safe and effective may help alleviate the symptoms of COVID-19, rather than conferring full immunity, The Guardian reported last week.

Thats a prediction echoed by Offit, who explained that early vaccines will aim to reduce a persons likelihood of developing moderate to severe disease, but might not protect against reinfection or mild symptoms associated with coronavirus.

The goal of this vaccine is going to be to keep you out of the hospital and keep you out of the morgue, Offit said.

In order to restore a degree of normalcy to U.S. lives without constant fear of a resurgence, Fauci has said that between 70 to 85 percent of the population will need to be immunized against coronavirus. That will grant the nation herd immunity, which occurs when a large enough portion of a population is immune to a disease that they indirectly protect those who are not immune.

Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, estimates that between 5 to 8 percent of the U.S. population has been infected with coronavirus so far. He emphasized during last weeks Senate hearing that it would take several years to achieve herd immunity through natural exposure, hence the urgent need for an effective vaccine.

The goal of this vaccine is going to be to keep you out of the hospital and keep you out of the morgue.

For many countries, financial challenges may make it difficult to afford the millions or even billions of doses needed to vaccinate their populations. Vaccines need to be kept at a strict temperature range to remain effective, which could make mass distribution a challenge in many parts of the globe given the volume of doses that this crisis demands.

Lois Privor-Dumm, director of policy, advocacy and communications at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Healths International Vaccine Access Center, said that the moral question of who to vaccinate first is a difficult one, but that most agree that health care workers are very high priority due to their increased risk of exposure.

She emphasized that we must also consider how to make the vaccine available to undocumented people, low-income people, those experiencing homelessness, and other populations that often struggle with health care access. People in these situations, she noted, can be the same ones doing essential work in their communities, putting themselves at greater risk of infection.

Another challenge will be ensuring that vaccines are effective in seniors, whose immune systems generally dont respond as efficiently to immunization. Offit said that it will therefore be important to immunize people who frequently interact with elders, such as home health workers and nursing home staff.

Maria Elena Bottazzi, associate dean at the Baylor College of Medicines National School of Tropical Medicine and co-director of Texas Childrens Center for Vaccine Development, said that any vaccine thats approved for use will have to meet a series of major requirements. It must induce the correct immune response, and have the best safety profile possible. In order to be distributed widely, it will need to be capable of being manufactured at large scales.

She also noted that after a vaccine is developed and brought to market, there are always second [and] third generation iterations that seek to improve upon the original.

Once an initial vaccine is launched and licensed, theres a lot of what we call postmarketing surveillance, which eventually leads to better vaccines, Bottazzi explained. Continuing to monitor a vaccine can also reveal any rare negative side effects.

Due to cost and manufacturing limitations, she envisions a toolbox of initial vaccines, some of which are more accessible to a wide range of nations, while others may only be available in wealthier countries.

Multiple lawmakers have raised concerns about the affordability and availability of an eventual vaccine. Sen. Bernie Sanders pointed out in last weeks hearing with leading health officials that billions of taxpayer dollars are funding pharmaceutical companies in their effort to develop a vaccine. He asked, given the significant of that investment, if every person in the country can expect to have access to an eventual vaccine regardless of their income.

All four public health officials present during the hearing Fauci, Redfield, Hahn, Redfield and Assistant Secretary for Health Adm. Brett Giroir answered Sanders question affirmatively.

Once a vaccine is finally approved, manufactured and available for widespread distribution, the question then becomes whether individuals and families want to be inoculated. A recent poll from The Associated Press and the NORC Center for Public Affairs research found that just 49 percent of people in the U.S. plan to actually get an eventual COVID-19 vaccine.

The poll also found that 40 percent of Black people and 23 percent of Hispanic people dont intend to get vaccinated at all. In the case of the Black community, that stance may be in part rooted in general mistrust of the medical establishment. Black Americans have long suffered from lack of access to quality medical care, and even outright abuse at the hands of researchers.

But in the context of the pandemic, those numbers are troubling, given that Black and Hispanic individuals, in addition to Native people, are four to five times more likely to be hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that long-standing systemic health and social inequities are responsible for putting marginalized people at an increased risk of experiencing severe illness due to the virus, regardless of age.

Megan McGrew/PBS NewsHour

During his testimony on Tuesday, Fauci pointed to a community engagement arm of Operation Warp Speed, echoing the concern that a substantial portion of the population, particularly those most at risk for serious disease, will be unwilling to receive the vaccine. He emphasized the need for trusted figures to engage with their communities and help spread accurate information regarding the importance of vaccination, citing the role that kind of outreach played in mitigating the AIDS crisis.

We used people in the community boots on the ground to go out, who looked and lived and are like the people theyre trying to engage, Fauci said, adding that such local engagement is critical to build the trust that will ultimately save lives.

So, while a coronavirus vaccine is still months possibly years away, public health officials know that the time now to start building the publics confidence.

Read more:

How a coronavirus vaccine will get to market - PBS NewsHour

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-8-2020 – 10 AM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

July 9, 2020

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 10:00 a.m., on July 8, 2020, there have been 192,849 totalconfirmatory laboratory results receivedfor COVID-19, with 3,615 total cases and 95 deaths.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASES PER COUNTY (Caseconfirmed by lab test/Probable case): Barbour(17/0), Berkeley (483/18), Boone (28/0), Braxton (3/0), Brooke (14/1), Cabell(167/6), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (11/0), Fayette (76/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant (15/1),Greenbrier (67/0), Hampshire (42/0), Hancock (30/3), Hardy (44/1), Harrison(85/0), Jackson (146/0), Jefferson (245/5), Kanawha (354/10), Lewis (19/1),Lincoln (9/0), Logan (30/0), Marion (91/3), Marshall (46/1), Mason (21/0),McDowell (6/0), Mercer (58/0), Mineral (58/2), Mingo (20/2), Monongalia(354/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (20/1), Nicholas (14/1), Ohio (112/1),Pendleton (13/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (36/1), Preston (74/16), Putnam(71/1), Raleigh (63/1), Randolph (169/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (11/0), Summers(2/0), Taylor (18/1), Tucker (6/0), Tyler (6/0), Upshur (21/1), Wayne (119/1),Webster (1/0), Wetzel (25/0), Wirt (5/0), Wood (139/8), Wyoming (8/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.Such is the case of Raleigh County in this report.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more information.

Continue reading here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-8-2020 - 10 AM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-8-2020 – 5 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

July 9, 2020

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 5:00 p.m., on July 8, 2020, there have been 193,810 total confirmatory laboratory results receivedfor COVID-19, with 3,707 total cases and 95 deaths.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(17/0), Berkeley (490/18), Boone (27/0), Braxton (3/0), Brooke (14/1), Cabell(178/6), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (11/0), Fayette (78/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(15/1), Greenbrier (67/0), Hampshire (42/0), Hancock (31/3), Hardy (45/1),Harrison (91/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (244/5), Kanawha (366/10), Lewis(19/1), Lincoln (10/0), Logan (30/0), Marion (92/3), Marshall (48/1), Mason(21/0), McDowell (6/0), Mercer (59/0), Mineral (59/2), Mingo (24/2), Monongalia(381/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (14/1), Ohio (113/0),Pendleton (13/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (36/1), Preston (75/16), Putnam(74/1), Raleigh (64/1), Randolph (170/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (11/0), Summers(2/0), Taylor (18/1), Tucker (6/0), Tyler (7/0), Upshur (21/1), Wayne (119/1),Webster (1/0), Wetzel (25/0), Wirt (5/0), Wood (149/8), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.Such is the case Boone, Jefferson, Morgan, and Wyoming counties in this report.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

See the original post:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-8-2020 - 5 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

Page 318«..1020..317318319320..330340..»